throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Jan. 2004, p. 159–166
`0099-2240/04/$08.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.159–166.2004
`Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
`
`Vol. 70, No. 1
`
`Directed Evolution of Pyruvate Decarboxylase-Negative Saccharomyces
`cerevisiae, Yielding a C2-Independent, Glucose-Tolerant, and
`Pyruvate-Hyperproducing Yeast
`Antonius J. A. van Maris,1 Jan-Maarten A. Geertman,1 Alexander Vermeulen,1
`Matthijs K. Groothuizen,1 Aaron A. Winkler,2 Matthew D. W. Piper,1
`Johannes P. van Dijken,1,2 and Jack T. Pronk1*
`Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, NL-2628 BC Delft,1 and BIRD
`Engineering B.V., NL-3044 CK Rotterdam,2 The Netherlands
`
`Received 23 September 2003/Accepted 26 September 2003
`
`The absence of alcoholic fermentation makes pyruvate decarboxylase-negative (Pdcⴚ) strains of Saccharo-
`myces cerevisiae an interesting platform for further metabolic engineering of central metabolism. However,
`Pdcⴚ S. cerevisiae strains have two growth defects: (i) growth on synthetic medium in glucose-limited chemostat
`cultures requires the addition of small amounts of ethanol or acetate and (ii) even in the presence of a C2
`compound, these strains cannot grow in batch cultures on synthetic medium with glucose. We used two
`subsequent phenotypic selection strategies to obtain a Pdcⴚ strain without these growth defects. An acetate-
`independent Pdcⴚ mutant was obtained via (otherwise) glucose-limited chemostat cultivation by progressively
`lowering the acetate content in the feed. Transcriptome analysis did not reveal the mechanisms behind the C2
`independence. Further selection for glucose tolerance in shake flasks resulted in a Pdcⴚ S. cerevisiae mutant
`(TAM) that could grow in batch cultures (␮max ⴝ 0.20 hⴚ1) on synthetic medium, with glucose as the sole
`carbon source. Although the exact molecular mechanisms underlying the glucose-tolerant phenotype were not
`resolved, transcriptome analysis of the TAM strain revealed increased transcript levels of many glucose-
`repressible genes relative to the isogenic wild type in nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures with excess glucose.
`In pH-controlled aerobic batch cultures, the TAM strain produced large amounts of pyruvate. By repeated
`glucose feeding, a pyruvate concentration of 135 g literⴚ1 was obtained, with a specific pyruvate production rate
`of 6 to 7 mmol g of biomassⴚ1 hⴚ1 during the exponential-growth phase and an overall yield of 0.54 g of
`pyruvate g of glucoseⴚ1.
`
`Traditionally, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been used to rap-
`idly ferment sugars to ethanol and carbon dioxide. More re-
`cently, developments in molecular biology have led to the
`application of S. cerevisiae as a host for therapeutic protein
`production (13) and for the production of chemicals with com-
`mercial value via metabolic engineering (28, 29, 31). In view of
`the process economy of manufacturing bulk products, the yield
`of the desired product should be maximized. In the case of
`yeasts as production organisms, this necessitates the redirec-
`tion of carbon fluxes away from alcoholic fermentation towards
`the desired product (1, 4, 7, 8, 19).
`Pyruvate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.1) is located at the branch
`point between fermentative and respiratory sugar catabolism
`and catalyzes the first step in the fermentative branch. S. cer-
`evisiae contains three structural genes (PDC1, PDC5, and
`PDC6) that encode active pyruvate decarboxylase isoenzymes
`(18). Pyruvate decarboxylase was long considered to be a
`strictly catabolic enzyme, but recently a biosynthetic function
`of the enzyme was discovered (8). Growth of pyruvate decar-
`boxylase-negative (Pdc⫺) S. cerevisiae in aerobic glucose-lim-
`ited chemostat cultures on synthetic media required a supply of
`acetate or ethanol corresponding to ca. 5% of the carbon fed
`
`* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biotech-
`nology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, NL-2628 BC
`Delft, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 15 278 3214. Fax: 31 15 213 3141.
`E-mail: J.T.Pronk@tnw.tudelft.nl.
`
`to the cultures (6, 8). This requirement for a C2 compound
`probably reflects an essential function of pyruvate decarboxyl-
`ase in the synthesis of cytosolic acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) (Fig.
`1), which is required for lysine and fatty acid synthesis (6).
`The overproduction of threonine aldolase, catalyzing the
`cleavage of threonine to glycine and acetaldehyde, can circum-
`vent the essential biosynthetic role of pyruvate decarboxylase
`(46). Even when the C2 requirement of Pdc⫺ strains is met by
`overexpression of threonine aldolase or by inclusion of ethanol
`or acetate in the medium, Pdc⫺ strains can only grow on
`glucose when the glucose supply is growth limiting. When Pdc⫺
`strains are exposed to the glucose concentrations normally
`applied in batch cultures, they excrete significant amounts of
`pyruvate but are completely unable to grow (9). This glucose
`sensitivity is a general characteristic of Pdc⫺ strains (6, 46).
`The exact cause of the glucose sensitivity of Pdc⫺ strains
`remains unknown. In the absence of alcoholic fermentation,
`which is blocked in Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae, cells rely on respiration
`(Fig. 1) for the reoxidation of cytosolic NADH (33). However,
`respiration of wild-type S. cerevisiae in batch cultures on glu-
`cose is repressed but not blocked, judging from the significant
`oxygen consumption rate under these conditions (1, 4). It is
`therefore unlikely that glucose repression of respiration is the
`sole cause of the glucose sensitivity of Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae.
`From the time of their invention, chemostats have been
`associated with selection of spontaneous mutants (25, 26). The
`first chemostat studies had already described the selection of
`
`159
`
`

`

`160
`
`VAN MARIS ET AL.
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`selection was performed in batch cultures to select for C2-
`independent Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae that could grow on high con-
`centrations of glucose. A second goal was to physiologically
`characterize the selected strain and to gain insight into the
`molecular mechanisms underlying the selected phenotype. To
`this end, biomass and product yields were analyzed in batch
`and chemostat cultures and genome-wide transcriptome anal-
`ysis was performed, using nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures
`grown under conditions of excess glucose.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Strains and maintenance. All S. cerevisiae strains used for this study (Table 1)
`were derived from the congenic CEN.PK family (41). Stock cultures were pre-
`pared from shake flask or chemostat cultures by the addition of 20% (vol/vol)
`glycerol to cultures and storage of 2-ml aliquots in sterile vials at ⫺80°C.
`Strain construction. RWB837 was obtained from a cross between CEN.PK182
`and CEN.PK111-61A (constructed by P. Ko¨tter, Frankfurt, Germany, and ob-
`tained from Jefferson C. Lievense, Tate and Lyle North America). The resulting
`diploid was sporulated and the asci were heated for 15 min at 56°C. This random
`dissection mix was then plated on YP medium, with 0.2% acetate as the carbon
`source. The resulting colonies were tested for growth on YP medium with
`glucose or ethanol. Colonies that could not grow on glucose were subsequently
`checked by PCR for the presence of a disrupted PDC6 gene and for mating type.
`Determination of the auxotrophic markers present, in this case ura3-52, then
`gave RWB837. The final strain (designated TAM), selected as described below,
`was transformed with YEplac195 (14) according to the high-efficiency protocol
`described by Gietz and Woods (15), resulting in the prototrophic (ura⫹)
`TAM⫹YEplac195 strain.
`Chemostat cultivation. Aerobic carbon-limited or nitrogen-limited chemostat
`cultivation reactions were performed as described previously (45). To comple-
`ment auxotrophy, 0.15 g of uracil liter⫺1 (32) was added to the media. The
`synthetic medium for the glucose-limited chemostat cultures contained 250 mM
`substrate carbon. When acetate was present, this was added in addition to the
`250 mM carbon from glucose, at concentrations corresponding to 0 to 5%
`acetate on a substrate-carbon basis. For nitrogen-limited cultures, the glucose
`concentration in the synthetic medium was adjusted during a trial run to result
`in a residual glucose concentration in the culture broth of approximately 100
`mM. Afterwards, reproducible duplicate cultures were obtained at this glucose
`concentration.
`Shake flask cultivation. The 500-ml shake flasks, containing 100 ml of syn-
`thetic medium (49), were incubated at 30°C in a rotary shaker (200 rpm). To
`rescue auxotrophy, 0.15 g of uracil liter⫺1 (32) was added to the media. Precul-
`tures of RWB837 were grown in 2% ethanol. For all other shake flask cultures,
`glucose was used as the carbon source, with concentrations ranging from 2 to
`10% (wt/vol). The selected strain was routinely checked for uracil auxotrophy to
`verify culture purity.
`Fermenter batch cultivation. Aerobic batch cultivation was performed at 30°C
`in 2-liter fermenters (Applikon, Schiedam, The Netherlands) with a working
`volume of 1 liter. The pH was controlled at 5.0 via automated addition of 10 M
`KOH (Applikon ADI 1030 biocontroller). The dissolved-oxygen concentration
`was maintained above 10% air saturation at all times by adjusting the stirrer
`speed between 800 and 1,000 rpm and the airflow between 0.50 and 0.75 liter
`min⫺1. A synthetic medium with twice the concentrations described by Verduyn
`et al. (49) was used for cultures. The initial glucose concentration was 100 g
`liter⫺1. During the repeated batch cultivation, 100 g of nonsterile solid glucose
`was added twice, at 32 and 48 h after inoculation. Antifoam (BDH) product was
`
`FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the metabolism of pyruvate
`decarboxylase-negative S. cerevisiae growing on glucose. By deletion of
`all genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase (reaction a), two important
`processes (dotted lines) are impaired as follows. First, reoxidation of
`cytosolic NADH via alcohol dehydrogenase (reaction b) is blocked.
`Cytosolic NADH must therefore be oxidized by the mitochondria via
`external NADH dehydrogenase (reaction c) or redox shuttle systems.
`Second, the formation of cytosolic acetyl-CoA from acetaldehyde is
`blocked. Instead, the C2 compounds required for cytosolic acetyl-CoA
`for lysine and fatty acid biosynthesis (reaction d) must be taken up
`from the environment. When oxygen consumption exceeds the amount
`of oxygen necessary for oxidation of glucose to pyruvate, mitochondrial
`oxidation of pyruvate, via pyruvate dehydrogenase (reaction e) and the
`tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle), can occur, resulting in CO2 for-
`mation and the oxidation of NADH via internal NADH dehydroge-
`nase (reaction f).
`
`an Escherichia coli strain with a higher affinity for the growth-
`limiting nutrient (26). Subsequent review articles cited a vari-
`ety of other examples of selection in chemostats (5, 37) and
`elaborated on the theory of selection during chemostat culti-
`vation (17). Similarly, extended cultivation of microorganisms
`in shake flasks can be used to select for spontaneous mutants
`that grow under conditions in which the original strain would
`not grow (10, 37).
`The first goal of this study was to apply selection pressure in
`batch and chemostat cultures to obtain a Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae
`strain capable of growth in batch cultures on synthetic medium
`containing high concentrations of glucose as the sole carbon
`and energy source. Prolonged chemostat cultivation on glucose
`with progressively decreasing acetate feeds was used to select
`for C2-independent Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae. A subsequent round of
`
`Strain
`
`TABLE 1. S. cerevisiae strains used in this study
`Genotype
`
`CEN.PK 113-7D............................................................MATa URA3 PDC1 PDC5 PDC6
`CEN.PK 182...................................................................MATa pdc1(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc5(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc6(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP
`CEN.PK 111-61A ..........................................................MAT␣ ura3–52 leu2–112 his3-⌬1
`RWB837 .........................................................................MATa pdc1(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc5(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc6(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP ura3–52
`RWB837ⴱ .......................................................................MATa pdc1(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc5(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc6(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP ura3–52, selected for C2
`independence in glucose-limited chemostats
`TAM ...............................................................................MATa pdc1(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc5(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP pdc6(⫺6,⫺2)::loxP ura3–52, selected for C2
`independence in glucose-limited chemostats and glucose-tolerant growth in batch culture
`
`

`

`VOL. 70, 2004
`
`PYRUVATE-HYPERPRODUCING Pdc⫺ S. CEREVISIAE
`
`161
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`FIG. 2. Growth of three Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae strains and wild-type S. cerevisiae on synthetic medium agar plates with ethanol (left plate) or glucose
`(right plate) as the carbon source. Both plates were supplemented with uracil to alleviate the auxotrophy of the Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae strains. Ethanol
`plates were incubated for 7 days, and glucose plates were incubated for 3 days. Strains: a, RWB837 (Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae); b, RWB837* (selected
`C2-independent S. cerevisiae); c, TAM (selected C2-independent and glucose-tolerant Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae); d, CEN.PK 113-7D (wild type).
`
`added to the fermenters when required. Culture purity was checked microscop-
`ically at the end of the fermentation and no contaminants were observed.
`Microarray analysis. Sampling of cells from chemostats, probe preparation,
`and hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays were performed as de-
`scribed previously (30). The results were derived from two independent replicate
`cultures for the selected Pdc⫺ strain and from three independent replicate
`cultures for the wild type.
`Microarray data acquisition and analysis. Acquisition and quantification of
`array images and data filtering were performed with the Affymetrix software
`packages Microarray Suite, v. 5.0, MicroDB, v. 3.0, and Data Mining Tool, v. 3.0.
`For further statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel running the Significance Analysis
`of Microarrays (v. 1.12) add-in was used, with a delta value that corresponded to
`the minimum expected median false-positive rate and a minimum change of
`twofold (40). In our experience, these criteria establish a data set that is able to
`be reproduced by an independent laboratory (30).
`Before comparison, all arrays were globally scaled to a target value of 150,
`using the average signal from all gene features, with Microarray Suite, v. 5.0. For
`the 9,335 transcript features on the YG-S98 arrays, a filter was applied to extract
`6,383 yeast open reading frames, of which 6,084 were different genes. This
`discrepancy was due to several genes being represented more than once when
`suboptimal probe sets were used in the array design. Since the 900 transcripts
`with the lowest transcription level could not be reliably measured, their level was
`set to a value of 12 for the comparison analyses.
`Promoter analyses were performed with the web-based software Regulatory
`Sequence Analysis Tools (42), as described previously (2).
`Analytical procedures. Dry weight determination, glucose, acetate, and me-
`tabolite analysis, off-gas analysis, and pyruvate decarboxylase and threonine
`aldolase assays were performed as described previously (46). The protein content
`of whole cells was determined by a modified biuret method (48).
`
`RESULTS
`Selection of C2-independent Pdcⴚ S. cerevisiae in chemostat
`cultures. For this study, the power of chemostat cultivation as
`a tool for the selection of microorganisms (5, 17) was used in
`an attempt to eliminate the C2 compound requirement of Pdc⫺
`S. cerevisiae (6, 8). A pdc1,5,6⌬ ura3⌬ S. cerevisiae strain
`(RWB837) was used for selection. The ura3⌬ auxotrophic
`marker was used to facilitate controls for culture purity. First,
`a steady state of Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae on a mixture of 5% acetate
`and 95% (on the basis of carbon) glucose was established. The
`metabolism of this culture was fully respiratory, as indicated by
`a respiratory quotient of just over one carbon dioxide molecule
`produced per oxygen molecule consumed. The biomass yield
`on carbon was 14.6 g of biomass mol of carbon⫺1, and all
`
`glucose and acetate were consumed. The acetate content of the
`synthetic medium was then reduced in five consecutive steps,
`from 5% of the total carbon content to zero. Each step lasted
`five volume changes. During this slow transition, RWB837
`adapted to growth in aerobic carbon-limited chemostat cul-
`tures, with glucose as the sole carbon source, at a dilution rate
`of 0.10 h⫺1. The biomass yield on substrate (14.7 g of biomass
`mol of carbon⫺1), oxygen consumption rate, and carbon diox-
`ide production rate (both around 2.9 mmol g of biomass⫺1
`h⫺1) of this glucose-limited culture indicated respiratory car-
`bon metabolism of the C2-independent Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae cul-
`ture, as was observed with wild-type S. cerevisiae under these
`conditions (43).
`Transcriptome analysis of the C2-independent Pdcⴚ S. cer-
`evisiae strain. Transcriptome analysis of the glucose-limited
`chemostat culture of the C2-independent S. cerevisiae strain
`was performed to study the genetic changes responsible for C2
`independence. The C2-independent Pdc⫺ strain was compared
`to glucose-limited chemostat cultures of the wild type (30). Of
`the genes with a known function, only 18 were upregulated and
`only 16 were downregulated in the selected strain. These up-
`regulated genes included 11 that were involved in meiosis or
`sporulation (HOP2, IME2, REC102, REC104, RED1, SLZ1,
`SPO13, SPO16, SPR1, YER179W, and ZIP1). The other seven
`upregulated genes were CAR1, ECM1, HXT3, HXT4, IRE1,
`NUF1, and NUF2. The downregulated genes included four
`expected genes (PDC1, PDC5, PDC6, and URA3) and, in ad-
`dition, ALP1, AQY1, GND2, FUI1, HSP30, HXT5, MEP2,
`MLS1, PDR12, PHO4, SSA3, and SSA4. None of these genes
`had a clear link to the C2 independence of the selected mutant.
`Transcript levels of the GLY1 gene, overexpression of which
`alleviates the C2 requirement of Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae (46), were
`not significantly changed in the selected strain.
`Selection for glucose tolerance in shake flask cultures. After
`selection for C2 independence, a small aliquot of the chemostat
`culture was transferred to a shake flask with synthetic medium
`containing uracil and 20 g of glucose liter⫺1. As was expected
`from previous results, neither the original Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae
`nor the C2-independent Pdc⫺ strain grew on agar plates with
`
`

`

`162
`
`VAN MARIS ET AL.
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`FIG. 3. Growth and pyruvate production during an aerobic re-
`peated batch culture on glucose of the selected TAM strain. The
`results shown are from one representative batch experiment. Biomass
`and pyruvate concentrations in independent replicate experiments var-
`ied by ⬍5%. Closed squares, pyruvate concentration; open symbols,
`glucose concentration (diamonds) or OD660 (circles).
`
`produce pyruvate, the fermentation was continued as a re-
`peated batch by the addition of solid glucose to the fermenter
`(Fig. 3). During this repeated batch phase, the specific growth
`rate gradually decreased and growth ultimately ceased, prob-
`ably due to nutrient limitations in the medium. The pyruvate
`concentration in the supernatant exceeded 100 g liter⫺1 within
`60 h of inoculation of the fermenter. The final concentration of
`pyruvate obtained after 100 h was 135 g liter⫺1, with an overall
`yield of 0.54 g of pyruvate g of glucose⫺1.
`Glucose-limited chemostat cultivation of the TAM strain.
`The obtained maximum specific growth rate of the TAM strain
`in batch culture with glucose was 0.20 h⫺1. Under the same
`conditions, wild-type S. cerevisiae CEN.PK 113-7D grew with a
`higher maximum specific growth rate of 0.37 h⫺1 (data not
`shown). For further study of this deviation in growth, glucose-
`limited chemostat cultures of the TAM strain were performed
`at increasing dilution rates. At a dilution rate of 0.10 h⫺1,
`glucose dissimilation by the TAM strain was fully respiratory,
`without the accumulation of metabolites. Except for a lower
`biomass yield of the selected strain (0.43 g of biomass g of
`glucose⫺1, compared to 0.48 g of biomass g of glucose⫺1 for
`the wild type), physiological parameters were comparable to
`those of the wild type (43). At a dilution rate of 0.15 h⫺1, the
`biomass yield of the TAM strain had increased to 0.47 g of
`biomass g of glucose⫺1, which is still lower than the 0.50 g of
`biomass g of glucose⫺1 for the wild type at this dilution rate.
`The TAM strain was capable of growth at a dilution rate of
`0.20 h⫺1 in glucose-limited chemostat cultures, but this growth
`was accompanied by a variable pyruvate production rate (0.25
`to 0.45 mmol of pyruvate g of biomass⫺1 h⫺1). At a dilution
`rate of 0.23 h⫺1, the TAM strain washed out of the chemostats,
`indicating a maximum specific growth rate of this strain be-
`tween 0.20 and 0.23 h⫺1 in glucose-limited chemostat cultures.
`After this prolonged glucose-limited chemostat cultivation, an
`
`synthetic medium, uracil, and 2% glucose (Fig. 2, right panel),
`whereas both strains did grow on agar plates with synthetic
`medium, uracil, and 2% ethanol (Fig. 2, left panels). In agree-
`ment with this, no growth was observed during the first 7 days
`of the initial shake flask culture of the C2-independent Pdc⫺
`strain on 2% glucose. Prolonged cultivation of the C2-indepen-
`dent Pdc⫺ strain, however, resulted in significant biomass for-
`mation, indicating an accumulation of spontaneous glucose-
`tolerant mutants. The observed growth rate was well below
`0.01 h⫺1. After growth had ceased, which occurred at a rela-
`tively low biomass density due to acidification of the culture by
`pyruvic acid accumulation, 1 ml of the culture was transferred
`to a new shake flask with identical synthetic medium.
`The process of serial transfer was repeated 27 times in total.
`The specific growth rate of the Pdc⫺ strain after the sixth
`transfer was already 0.10 h⫺1 on 20 g of glucose liter⫺1. After
`14 shake flask cultivations and an obtained specific growth rate
`of 0.18 h⫺1, the glucose content of the medium was raised to
`32, 54, 69, and 100 g liter⫺1 in consecutive cultures. At 100 g of
`glucose liter⫺1, the finally obtained C2-independent, glucose-
`tolerant Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae culture grew at a specific growth
`rate of 0.20 h⫺1.
`The culture, possibly consisting of a mixture of different
`spontaneous mutants, was streaked onto agar plates containing
`synthetic medium, glucose, and uracil. Four of the resulting
`colonies were tested for growth in shake flasks on glucose, and
`no significant differences in specific growth rate were observed.
`One of these cultures was chosen for further study, and this
`C2-independent glucose-tolerant Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae strain will
`be referred to as TAM in this and future work.
`The differences in growth among the original Pdc⫺ strain
`(RWB837), the C2-independent Pdc⫺ strain, the TAM strain,
`and the isogenic wild-type strain on synthetic medium, with
`glucose or ethanol as the sole carbon source, were clearly
`demonstrated by agar plate growth, as depicted in Fig. 2. Al-
`though the TAM strain displayed a 3-day-longer lag phase, all
`four strains grew on plates with ethanol as the carbon source.
`As described above, when glucose was the carbon source, the
`original Pdc⫺ strain (RWB837) and the C2-independent Pdc⫺
`strain did not grow. Consistent with the growth in shake flasks
`with glucose, the selected TAM strain, and of course the wild
`type, proliferated well on the agar plates with glucose (Fig. 2).
`Pyruvate production by the selected TAM strain in fer-
`menter cultures. During selection for glucose tolerance in
`shake flasks, rapid acidification of the culture due to pyruvate
`excretion was observed. To study the growth and pyruvate
`production of the TAM strain under controlled conditions,
`aerobic batch cultivations with 100 g of glucose liter⫺1 were
`performed in fermenters at a constant pH of 5.0. During the
`exponential-growth phase (Fig. 3),
`the maximum specific
`growth rate of the TAM strain was 0.20 h⫺1, which was equal
`to the maximum specific growth rate in shake flasks. Consistent
`with the observations with shake flasks, large amounts of pyru-
`vate were produced in fermenter cultures. The rate of pyruvate
`production during the exponential-growth phase was 6 to 7
`mmol g of biomass⫺1 h⫺1. In the first 40 h of this batch,
`starting with a low biomass concentration (optical density at
`660 nm [OD660], 0.1), a pyruvate concentration of 50 g liter⫺1
`was obtained, with a yield of 0.55 g of pyruvate g of glucose⫺1.
`For further assessment of the potential of the TAM strain to
`
`

`

`VOL. 70, 2004
`
`PYRUVATE-HYPERPRODUCING Pdc⫺ S. CEREVISIAE
`
`163
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`type. The respiratory oxidation of the NADH formed during
`pyruvate formation lowered the respiratory quotient to 0.70
`mmol of carbon dioxide produced per mmol of oxygen con-
`sumed. The protein content of the biomass was slightly higher
`for the TAM strain (0.33 g of protein g of biomass⫺1) than for
`the wild type (0.29 g of protein g of biomass⫺1). This higher
`protein content of the cells partially explains the significantly
`lower yield on nitrogen of the TAM strain (14.7 g of biomass
`g of nitrogen⫺1) than of the wild type (18.8 g of biomass g of
`nitrogen⫺1).
`Transcriptome analysis of the TAM strain. Central in tran-
`scriptome analysis is the choice of adequate culture conditions
`for the comparison. In the case of the selected TAM strain, the
`absence of C2 compounds and the presence of high levels of
`glucose in the broth are typical for uncovering its phenotype.
`To combine the benefit of chemostat cultures in microarray
`studies (30) and the requirement for excess glucose, the nitro-
`gen-limited chemostat cultures of the TAM strain and the
`isogenic wild-type strain CEN.PK 113-7D were chosen for the
`transcriptome analysis.
`The comparison of the nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures
`revealed 305 genes of which the mRNA levels were signifi-
`cantly changed and at least twofold higher in the TAM strain
`than in the wild type. The mRNA abundance of 168 genes was
`significantly changed and at least twofold lower in the TAM
`strain than in the wild type. In total, these changed genes
`comprise almost 8% of the total S. cerevisiae genome. Of these
`changed genes, 273 (58%) have an unknown function, which is
`higher than the percentage of not fully annotated genes in the
`whole S. cerevisiae genome (47%).
`Sequence analysis of the upstream regions of genes that are
`upregulated in the selected strain showed an overrepresenta-
`tion of possible Mig1p-binding sites among these genes, indi-
`cating an (partial) alleviation of Mig1p-mediated repression.
`Although the transcript level of the primarily posttranscrip-
`tionally (12) regulated MIG1 was not changed, the transcript
`level of its close homologue MIG2 was downregulated almost
`11-fold. Many genes required for growth on carbon sources
`other than glucose were upregulated in the TAM strain. This
`included genes involved in gluconeogenesis and ethanol utili-
`zation (ACS1, ADH2, ADR1, CAT8, FBP1, and SIP4), fatty
`acid metabolism (CAT2, CRC1, ECI1, FAA2, FOX2, PEX11,
`POT1, POT1, and YAT2), galactose metabolism (GAL2,
`GAL3, and GAL4), maltose metabolism (MPH2, MPH3, and
`YFL052W), and pyruvate and lactate metabolism (DLD1 and
`JEN1).
`A striking observation was the change in expression of the
`genes coding for the hexose transporters. Despite the high
`glucose concentrations under nitrogen limitation, the low-af-
`finity transporters (HXT1 and HXT3) were downregulated 50-
`fold in the TAM strain compared to in the wild type (Fig. 4).
`The known high-affinity transporters (HXT6 and HXT7) were
`also downregulated (fourfold) in this strain (Fig. 4). As a re-
`sult, the summed transcript abundance of all HXT genes rep-
`resented on the arrays (HXT1 to HXT10, HXT12, HXT14, and
`HXT16) was four times lower in the TAM strain under nitro-
`gen limitation than in the wild type. In the glucose-responsive
`regulatory network of the HXT genes (35), the only significant
`transcriptional change was the 12-fold downregulation of
`
`TABLE 2. Physiology of strain TAM (C2-independent, glucose-
`tolerant Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae) and the isogenic wild-type strain
`CEN.PK 113-7D in aerobic nitrogen-limited chemostat culture at a
`dilution rate of 0.10 h⫺1a
`
`Characteristicb
`
`⫺1)
`
`⫺1)
`
`Reservoir glucose concentration
`(g liter⫺1)
`Residual glucose concentration
`(g liter⫺1)
`Ysx (gbiomass gglucose
`⫺1)
`Ynx (gbiomass gN
`Protein content (gprotein gbiomass
`Respiratory quotient
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qglucose (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qethanol (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qpyruvate (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qglycerol (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qacetate (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qCO2 (mmol gbiomass
`⫺1 h⫺1)
`qO2 (mmol gbiomass
`Recovery of consumed carbon (%)
`Total carbon recovery (%)
`
`Wild type
`
`58.8 ⫾ 0.1
`
`TAM
`
`35.1 ⫾ 0.1
`
`16.7 ⫾ 0.7
`
`20.4 ⫾ 0.1
`
`0.09 ⫾ 0.00
`18.8 ⫾ 0.1
`0.29 ⫾ 0.01
`4.5 ⫾ 0.2
`5.8 ⫾ 0.1
`8.0 ⫾ 0.1
`0.1 ⫾ 0.0
`0.08 ⫾ 0.00
`0.06 ⫾ 0.02
`12.1 ⫾ 0.2
`2.7 ⫾ 0.1
`94.0 ⫾ 1.0
`95.6 ⫾ 0.7
`
`0.21 ⫾ 0.00
`14.7 ⫾ 0.1
`0.33 ⫾ 0.01
`0.70 ⫾ 0.01
`2.6 ⫾ 0.1
`⬍0.01
`2.8 ⫾ 0.0
`⬍0.01
`⬍0.01
`2.8 ⫾ 0.0
`4.0 ⫾ 0.1
`97.4 ⫾ 0.7
`98.6 ⫾ 0.4
`
`a The wild-type data were obtained from the same cultures as those used by
`Boer et al. (2).
`b Averages and mean deviations were obtained from duplicate (TAM) and
`triplicate (wild type) experiments with independent steady-state cultures. Calcu-
`lations of carbon recovery were based on a 48% (wt/vol) carbon content of the
`biomass. Ysx and Ynx are the biomass yields on glucose and nitrogen, respectively.
`Specific production or consumption rates are indicated with a q.
`
`aliquot of the culture was transferred to a shake flask with
`100 g of glucose liter⫺1. With this shake flask, rapid growth was
`observed, indicating that the culture had maintained its glu-
`cose-tolerant phenotype.
`Nitrogen-limited chemostat cultivation of the TAM strain.
`Comparison of the selected TAM strain with wild-type S. cer-
`evisiae CEN.PK 113-7D is best performed at high glucose con-
`centrations and in the absence of C2 compounds in the me-
`dium. Nitrogen-limited chemostat cultivation at the same
`dilution rate, with glucose as the sole carbon source, combines
`these conditions with the advantages of chemostat cultivation
`for reproducible physiological studies. The glucose concentra-
`tions in the synthetic medium were chosen such that approxi-
`mately the same residual glucose concentration was obtained
`in the cultivations of both strains (Table 2).
`The wild type showed alcoholic fermentation, as is charac-
`teristic for S. cerevisiae under conditions of excess glucose. This
`resulted in a low biomass yield on glucose (0.09 g of biomass g
`of glucose⫺1), an ethanol production rate of 8.0 mmol g of
`biomass⫺1 h⫺1, and a respiratory quotient of 4.5 mmol of
`carbon dioxide produced per mmol of oxygen consumed. The
`protein content (0.29 g of protein g of biomass⫺1) and the
`biomass yield on nitrogen (18.8 g of biomass g of nitrogen⫺1)
`were in good agreement with previously published values (44,
`45) for nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures of wild-type strain
`CEN.PK 113-7D.
`Under the same conditions, the TAM strain, which fully
`depends on respiration in the absence of alcoholic fermenta-
`tion, had a higher biomass yield on glucose (0.21 g of biomass
`g of glucose⫺1) and produced pyruvate as the only major by-
`product, at a rate of 2.8 mmol g of biomass⫺1 h⫺1 (Table 2).
`The oxygen consumption rate was 4.0 mmol g of biomass⫺1
`h⫺1, compared to 2.7 mmol g of biomass⫺1 h⫺1 for the wild
`
`

`

`164
`
`VAN MARIS ET AL.
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on April 27, 2012 by guest
`
`mostat cultivation resulted in selection of a Pdc⫺ strain that
`did not require the addition of C2 compounds to the growth
`environment (Fig. 1). Transcriptome analysis did not reveal the
`mechanism underlying the physiological changes in this strain.
`However, based on physiology, some possible sources of cyto-
`solic acetyl-CoA can be excluded.
`Massive overexpression of GLY1, encoding threonine aldo-
`lase, has been shown to circumvent the essential biosynthetic
`role of pyruvate decarboxylase in Pdc⫺ S. cerevisiae (45). De-
`spite the higher GLY1 transcript levels in the TAM strain, the
`low affinity of Gly1p for threonine (Km, 55 mM [22]) and the
`relatively low intracellular threonine concentration (5 to 10
`mM [16, 23]), combined with the low in vitro activity (⬍0.005
`U mg of protein⫺1), make it unlikely that threonine aldolase is
`responsible for its C2-independent phenotype. In addition,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket