`
`
`
` Entered: November 12, 2014
`
`Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00580
`Patent 6,896,773 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ERRATA
`
`The Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review entered on
`
`October 10, 2014 (Paper No. 11) is corrected as follows:
`
`On page 46, lines 8–16, the paragraph and table therein are replaced
`
`by the following paragraph and table:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00580
`Patent 6,896,773 B2
`
`
`ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), an inter partes
`
`review is hereby authorized for the following grounds of unpatentability for
`
`the ’773 patent:
`
`Claim(s)
`
`Basis References
`
`1, 6, and 8–20
`
`§ 103(a) Mozgrin and Fortov
`
`5
`
`§ 103(a) Mozgrin, Fortov, and Kawamata
`
`3, 4, and 34–39 § 103(a) Mozgrin, Fortov, and Lantsman
`
`7
`
`2
`
`
`
`§ 103(a) Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, and Fortov
`
`§ 103(a) Mozgrin, Mozgrin Thesis, Fortov, and Raizer
`
`We note that the Decision on Institution included claims 36–39 under
`
`this instituted ground over Mozgrin and Fortov, but we previously had
`
`acknowledged that Gillette had made no showing against those claims in its
`
`Petition. Decision on Institution at 8, n.3. We clarify that claims 36–39 are
`
`not included in the instituted ground over Mozgrin and Fortov.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case IPR2014-00580
`Patent 6,896,773 B2
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Michael A. Diener
`Michael.Diener@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`Andrej Barbic
`Andrej.barbic@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Bruce Barker
`bbarker@chsblaw.com
`
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
