throbber
|||ll||||||ll|||l||l||l||||||||||||l|||l
`US006896/75132
`
`(12)
`
`United States Patent
`
`Cliistyakov
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`May 24, 2005
`
`(54) HIGH-POW ER PULSE!) MAGNETICALLY
`ENHANCED PLASMA PROCESSING
`
`W0
`W0
`
`W0 98/40532
`W0 01/98553 A1
`
`9/1998
`12/Z001
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Roman Cliistyakov, Andover, MA
`(US)
`Mwsfiekt MA <US>
`Zond»
`._
`.
`,
`I
`.
`.
`,
`.
`\
`Subiectlto any clisclaiiner, the term 01 this
`patent is e.\tende(l or adiusied under 35
`U S C 1540)) bv 386 days
`'
`'
`’
`’
`'
`‘
`"
`- -
`0
`. ..
`1 /06"-51
`Oct. 29 2002
`7
`Prior Pul)lication Data
`Us 2004/0082187 Al /\pl‘. 29, 2004
`
`. C23C 14/34; C231: 1/O0
`Im_ CL7 0
`(51)
`_____________ __ 204/19232; 204/29831;
`(52) us CL
`204/29833; 204/29834; 204/29837; 216/67;
`216/71; 156/345.43; 156/345.44; 156/345.46
`(58) Field of Search ..................... .. 204/192.32, 298.31,
`204/298.33, 298.34, 298.37; 216/67, 7];
`155/345.437 34544’ 345.46
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`US 5,863,392, 1/1999, Drummond el al. (Withdrawn)
`E ‘
`l
`l}OfL IT
`(
`Pl-
`.,
`.119,
`1.3.
`52321352212 or L311 TZ$l§Z§Zl§§Z P122215 123,321. 3.
`Chistyakov, HiUh—Power Pulsed Maanetron Sputtering,
`U_S_App1. Nolzblo/0652777 Filed: Se; 30’ 2002’
`g ,
`_
`Lhistyakov, Roman, IIigh—Power Pulsed Magnetron Sput»
`tering, U.S.Appl. No.: 10/065,277, 1"-ilecl: Sep. 30, 2002.
`Booth et al. The Transition From Symmetric To Asymmet-
`.
`.’
`’
`_
`.
`ric Discharges In Pulsed 13.56 MHz Capacity Coupled
`Plasmas, J. A) 1. Ph ts., Jul. 15, 1997,
`. 5524560, vol. 82
`H13
`3
`f I h
`PP
`2 ,A ‘
`it t
`>
`.
`'
`.
`( ) mcncan Us I U G O
`yslcs
`(commued)
`
`Pr1'nzaryExaminer—Rodriey G.‘McDonald
`(74) Attorney, Agent,
`or Fzrm—Kurt Rauschenbach;
`Rauschenbach Patent Law Group, LLC
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`
`Magnetically enhanced plasma processing methods and
`apparatus are described. A magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus according to the present
`invention
`includes an anode and a cathode that is positioned adjacent
`to the anode. An ionization source generates a weakly-
`ioni/.ed plasma proximate to the cathode. A magnet
`is
`positioned to generate a magnetic field proximate to the
`.
`.
`.
`,
`wea.kly—ionized plasma. The magnetic field substantially
`traps electrons in the weakly-ionized plasma proximate to
`the cathode. A power supply produces an electric field in a
`gap between the anode and the cathode. The electric field
`generates excited atoms in the weakly-ionized plasma and
`generates secondary electrons from the cathode. The sec-
`oiidary electrons ionize the excited atoms, thereby creating
`a strongly-ionized plasma.
`Voltage supply applies a bias
`voltage to a substrate that is positioned proximate to the
`cathode that causes ions in the plurality of ions to impact a
`surface of the substrate in a manner that causes etching of
`the surface of the substrate.
`
`03>
`*
`
`(
`
`) Notice.
`
`_
`..
`
`,, .
`_.
`(71) Amfl N0
`22
`Filed:
`(65)
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U .5. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`............ .. 204/298
`
`315/111.81
`
`5/1986 Cuonio et al.
`4,588,490 A
`1/1991 Wolfe et a1_
`4,933,253 A
`1/1992 Koslfiishi ei a1_
`5,083,051 A
`3/1998 Wolfe et al.
`5,728,261 A
`204/298.11
`3/1998 Okamura at al.
`$728,278 A
`~~~~ ~- 204/29337
`@1998 Kilwshila 9‘ 31-
`5:795.-452 A
`]I)I:::::‘:‘t“:11e‘ ‘"1" """""
`31
`9/2002 Li“ 6; al.
`6:451:703 B1
`10/2002 Kumm et al.
`6,4./L833 B2
`2/2002 Zhang et a1_
`2002/0019139 A1
`8/2002 Sumiya et a1_
`2002/0114897 A1
`1/2003 Hot-toka at at.
`2003/0005003 A1
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`1 204/192.37
`llll __ 438/714
`.... N 427559
`155/345,45
`
`EP
`
`0428 161 A2
`
`5/1991
`
`37 Claims, 18 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`|PR2014—OO578
`
`Gillette v. Zond
`
`Gillette 1028
`
`IPR2014-00578
`Gillette v. Zond
`Gillette 1028
`
`

`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Bunshah, et al., Deposition Technologies For Films And
`Coatings, Materials Science Series, pp. 176—183, Noyes
`Publications, Park Ridge, NeW Jersey.
`Daugherty, et al., Attachrnent—Dorninated Electron—Bea
`rn—IoniZed Discharges, Applied Science Letters, May 15,
`1976, vol. 28, No. 10, American Institute of Physics.
`Goto, et al., Dual Excitation Reactive Ion Etcher for LoW
`Energy Plasrna Processing, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Sep./Oct.
`1992, pp. 3048—3054, vol. 10, No. 5, American Vacuurn
`Society.
`KouZnetsov, et al., A Novel Pulsed Magnetron Sputter
`Technique UtiliZing Very High Target PoWer Densities,
`Surface & Coatings Technology, pp. 290—293, Elsevier
`Sciences S.A.
`Lindquist, et al., High Selectivity Plasrna Etching Of Silicon
`Dioxide With A Dual Frequency 27/2 MHZ Capacitive RF
`Discharge.
`Macak, Reactive Sputter Deposition Process of A1203 and
`CharacteriZation Of A Novel High Plasrna Density Pulsed
`Magnetron Discharge, Linkoping Studies In Science And
`Technology, 1999, pp. 1—2, SWeden.
`
`Macak, et al., IoniZed Sputter Deposition Using An
`EXtrernely High Plasrna Density Pulsed Magnetron Dis
`charge, J. Vac Sci. Technol. A., Jul/Aug. 2000, pp.
`1533—1537, vol. 18, No. 4, American Vacuurn Society.
`
`MoZgrin, et al., High—Current LoW—Pressure Quasi —Sta
`tionary Discharge In A Magnetic Field: EXperirnental
`Research, Plasma Physics Reports, 1995, pp. 400—409, vol.
`21, No. 5, MoZgrin, Feitsov, Khodachenko.
`
`Rossnagel, et al., Induced Drift Currents In Circular Planar
`Magnetrons, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A., Jan/Feb. 1987, pp.
`88—91, vol. 5, No. 1, American Vacuurn Society.
`
`Sheridan, et al., Electron Velocity Distribution Functions In
`ASputtering Magnetron Discharge For The EXB Direction,
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A., Jul/Aug. 1998, pp. 2173—2176, vol.
`16, No. 4, American Vacuurn Society.
`
`Steinbruchel, A Simple Forrnula For LoW—Energy Sputter
`ing Yields, Applied Physics A., 1985, pp. 37—42, vol. 36,
`Springer—Verlag.
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 1 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`100
`\
`
`104
`f
`
`110
`
`1,0
`\
`
`13,
`
`I\\\Y\\\\\X\\\\\\‘\\J’13O
`; """ “1'4‘B1;;1i;'4e"$521,105
`L-_l ...... -J'J'I." ________ “.1444
`I\\\Y\\\X\\\\\\\\\\H 1 4
`
`1;)
`
`140
`1
`
`110-1"
`
`112
`
`109
`
`~1ua
`
`VACUUM 106
`PUMP
`
`FIG. 1
`PRIOR ART
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 2 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`203
`
`210
`
`GAS
`SOURCE
`
`MATCHiNG
`UNIT
`
`224
`
`207
`
`7/////7///AV//////V//
`
`mm
`v
`211
`
`9
`
`\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`mm, /\ MA) \
`
`u: __
`
`,
`
`*-206
`
`VACUUM
`PUMP
`
`204
`
`FIG. 2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 3 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`wmw
`
`I I O I I I I I I I l I l I l n l If
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 4 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`I I I u a n I I l l n I - I 0 - n ll
`
`| | b l l | s u | n I | l n | I n I l I n I | | n u t II
`
`mom
`
`won
`
`can
`
`mmzzua
`
`I---
`
`_---____ A. ‘in
`
`IIIIIIII ll
`
`
`
`- 2653 - 2,506.
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 5 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`V
`-200V-30kV
`
`320
`
`-1 00V-5kV
`
`--1 0A—50 DDA
`
`-0. 1 A-1 DOA
`
`-1 kW— 1 OMW
`
`-0.01 KW-1 OOKW
`
`IOn-aII1nI|IIIIIIIIuIInIIIIIIInl
`
`II1JIJJuIIInIInIIIIIItIIIII.AIa0uOIIIIIIIIIn|ntIII|IInUn¢IIAIIIIIII|IIIn\|nIIII
`
`|IIlIIIIIIIIII|IInA|IanIIuIIIIIInnIuI|IIInIIIIlsIunnI:oIo|uIIIIIIIIon
`
`tzta ta
`
`*5
`
`FIG. 5
`
`TIME
`
`TIME
`
`IIIaJValnnrIInIuIuA:IIIcI1-nunn|IIIIIIIInIII\I|IIInInIInInIaIIII
`
`
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 6 6f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`mmm
`
`\
`
`cow
`
`,//,
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 7 of 1s
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`A w 3
`
`
`
` $1 V lwwggg \. all" .. .I....~
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 8 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`vov\
`
`a! E! L
`
`_
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 9 of 1s
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`,
`
`/ , \ /
`
`T _ Cd:
`
`__
`
`
`
`2% V \w? 34/ m?
`
`III
`
`“:li r,
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 10 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`450
`
`\
`
`.5.
`
`o
`J1/
`
`W.mm\\fink
`
`A...
`
`,,.%k\. V1/!V.
`\\\\\\§
`
`K
`
`m§\\.%\.g4
`
`/1?’/Iii/J
`7
`/
`
`S
`
`.a..A.////H&K
`
`///Ifi
`
`7/
`
`
`
`ItIV-nfrfllfl!/J)Illllfll/I/Ii!/////f.fl-VII;
`
`211
`
`2 1 2
`
`\§
`
`FIG. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 11 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`w .OE
`
`m2;
`
`-.--..--------.._--..--_--------.-_------- J
`
`A
`
`com
`
`mom
`
`I
`%
`
`
`
`.2162.‘ 2.26.0:
`
`mom
`
`wow
`
`| n | l I l I I I a | | l I l 0 I I 0 ll
`
`lllllllllll '
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllll I,
`
`
`
`>222 - 26.2.1
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 12 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`mm .QE
`
`Om .OI
`
`mm“
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 13 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`P
`
`m §\\\\§\Y\\Q§
`
`% I
`
`% _#_ E m
`
`_ _
`
`
`
` . ...._ Q =01, WT m - 4 mm wfw MU m"2 m\
`
`,
`
`/////////////V/////%///
`
`
`
` M m . M Q E g
`
`w I
`I 2 .. 2
`
`2
`
`%
`
`VACUUM
`PUMP
`
`FIG. 10
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 14 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`n ////lf//
`
`8 w
`m m m
`
`\u , s z m
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
` m\ z \m m s. E u P m n .. .. J 4 . _ g
`
`Am 42 WP
`SC m . / WW
`
`v -
`
`6 m mT WE m M\
`%W K Q
`
`E5\
`
`P @ __
`
`FIG. 11
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 15 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`600
`
`START 502
`
`If
`—————>[ PUMP DOWN CHAMBER =
`
`606
`CHAMBER
`PRESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`PASS FEED GAS INTO CHAMBER
`PROXIMATE TO CATHODE
`
`/508
`_
`
`CHAMBER
`PRESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`610
`
`GAS
`P RESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`/614
`APPLY APPROPRIATE MAGNETIC
`FIELD PRDXIMATE TO FEED GAS
`
`FIELD
`PROPER?
`
`FIG. 12A
`
`/ 618
`IONIZE FEED GAS TO GENERATE ‘
`WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`‘
`
`FIG. 12B
`
`FIG. 12
`
`520
`
`GAS
`WEAKLY
`IONIZED?
`
`FIG. 12A
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 16 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`_
`
`/ 621
`
`APPLY NEGATIVE BIAS TO SUBSTRATE
`
`"I GENERATE STRONGLY-IONIZED
`
`PLASMA FROM WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`
`/
`
`'
`
`624
`
`PLASMA
`STRONGLY
`IONIZED?
`
`_
`MONITOR PLASMA ETCH
`
`L 628
`
`630
`
`/ 632
`END
`
`Y
`
`PLASMA
`ETCH
`COMPLETE
`
`N
`
`FIG. 12B
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 17 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`650
`
`START 602
`
`= PUMP DQWI‘I CHAMBER :
`
`606
`CHAMBER
`PRESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`PASS FEED GAS INTO CHAMBER
`PROXIMATE TO CATHODE
`
`/ 608
`
`CHAMBER
`PRESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`GAS
`PRESSURE
`CORRECT?
`
`APPLY APPROPRIATE MAGNETIC
`FIELD PRDXIMATE TO FEED GAS
`
`FIG. 13A
`
`FIG. 135
`
`FIG. 13
`
`/61H
`IONIZE FEED GAS TO GENERATE
`WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`
`T
`
`G20
`
`GAS
`WEAKLY
`IONIZED'?
`
`FIG. 13A
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 18 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`?
`APPLY NEGATIVE BIAS TO SUBSTRATE
`
`/ 621
`
`GENERATE STRONGLY-IONIZED
`PLASMA FROM WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`
`‘
`
`624
`
`PLASMA
`STRO NGLY
`ION IZED?
`
`MONITOR ETCH RATE
`
`/652
`<
`
`654
`
`ETCH
`RATE
`SUFFICENT
`I;
`
`N
`
`/656
`INCREASE
`HIGH-POWER PULSE
`To CATHODE TO
`INCREASE ETCH RATE
`
`Y
`
`/658
`J,
`CONTINUE
`ETCHING
`
`1
`
`660
`
`PLASMA
`ETCH
`COMPLETE
`9
`
`f 662
`END
`
`FIG. 13B
`
`

`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`1
`HIGH-POWER PULSED MAGNETICALLY
`ENHANCED PLASMA PROCESSING
`
`BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
`
`Plasma processes are widely used in many industries,
`such as the semiconductor manufacturing industry. For
`example, plasma etching is widely used in the semiconduc-
`tor manufacturing industry. There are four basic types of
`plasma etching processes that are used to remove material
`from surfaces: sputter etching, pure chemical etching, ion
`energy driven etching, and ion inhibitor etching.
`Sputter etching is the ejection of atoms from the surface
`of a substrate due to energetic ion bombardment. Pure
`chemical etching uses a plasma discharge to supply gas-
`phase etchant atoms or molecules that chemically react with
`the surface of a substrate to form gas-phase products.
`Ion-enhanced energy driven etching uses a plasma discharge
`to supply both etchant and energetic ions to a surface of a
`substrate. Ion inhibitor etching uses a discharge to provide
`etchant, energetic ions, and inhibitor precursor molecules
`that deposit on the substrate to form a protective layer film.
`It is desirably to increase the uniformity and etch rate of
`known sputter etching systems.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`This invention is described with particularity in the
`detailed description. The above and further advantages of
`this invention may be better understood by referring to the
`following description in conjunction with the accompanying
`drawings,
`in which like numerals indicate like structural
`elements and features in various figures. The drawings are
`not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon
`illustrating the principles of the invention.
`FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a known
`
`magnetically enhanced etching apparatus having a having a
`radio-frequency (RF) power supply.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment
`
`of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`according to the present invention.
`FIG. 3 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the anode and
`
`the cathode of the magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical representation of the applied
`power of a pulse as a function of time for periodic pulses
`applied to the plasma in the magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 5 illustrates graphical representations of the applied
`voltage, current, and power as a function of time for periodic
`pulses applied to the plasma in the magnetically enhanced
`plasma processing apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 6A through FIG. 6D illustrate various simulated
`magnetic field distributions proximate to the cathode for
`various electron E><B drift currents according to the present
`invention.
`FIG. 7 illustrates a cross-sectional view of another
`
`embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 8 illustrates a graphical representation of pulse
`power as a function of time for periodic pulses applied to the
`plasma in the magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus of FIG. 7.
`FIG. 9A through FIG. 9C are cross-sectional views of
`various embodiments of cathodes according to the present
`invention.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`FIG. 10 illustrates a cross-sectional view of another
`
`illustrative embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of another illustrative
`
`embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 12 is a flowchart of an illustrative process for
`magnetically enhanced plasma etching according to the
`present invention.
`FIG. 13 is a flowchart of an illustrative process for
`controlling etch rate according to the present invention.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a known
`
`magnetically enhanced etching apparatus 100 having a
`radio-frequency (RF) power supply 102. The known mag-
`netically enhanced etching apparatus 100 includes a vacuum
`chamber 104 for confining a plasma 105. A vacuum pump
`106 is coupled in fluid communication with the vacuum
`chamber 104 via a conduit 108. The vacuum pump 106 is
`adapted to evacuate the vacuum chamber 104 to high
`vacuum and to maintain the chamber at a pressure that is
`suitable for plasma processing. A gas source 109, such as an
`argon gas source, introduces gas into the vacuum chamber
`104 through a gas inlet 110. A valve 112 controls the gas
`flow to the chamber 104.
`
`The magnetically enhanced etching apparatus 100 also
`includes a cathode 114.
`
`The cathode 114 is an electrode that is generally in the
`shape of a circular disk. The cathode 114 is electrically
`connected to a first terminal 118 of a blocking capacitor 120
`with an electrical transmission line 122. A second terminal
`
`124 of the blocking capacitor 120 is coupled to a first output
`126 of the RF power supply 102. The cathode 114 is isolated
`from the vacuum chamber 104 by an insulator 128 that is
`used to pass the electrical transmission line 122 through a
`wall of the vacuum chamber 104.
`
`An anode 130 is positioned in the vacuum chamber 104
`opposite the cathode 114. The anode 130 is electrically
`coupled to ground by an electrical transmission line 132. A
`second output 134 of the RF power supply 102 is also
`electrically coupled to ground. An insulator 136 is used to
`pass the electrical transmission line 132 through a wall of the
`vacuum chamber 104 in order to isolate the anode 130 from
`the vacuum chamber 104. The vacuum chamber 104 can
`
`also be electrically coupled to ground.
`A pair of magnets 140 is positioned outside the chamber
`104 to generate a magnetic field 142 in a direction that is
`substantially parallel to the top surface of the cathode 114.
`A substrate 144 is disposed on the cathode 114.
`In operation, the substrate 144 to be etched is positioned
`on the cathode 114. The chamber 104 is sufficiently evacu-
`ated to high vacuum by the vacuum pump 106. The etching
`gas from the gas source 109 is introduced into the chamber
`104 through the gas inlet 110. The RF power supply 102
`applies high-frequency radiation at 13.56 MHZ through a
`blocking capacitor 120 to the cathode 114.
`The high-frequency radiation applied to the cathode 114
`creates a high-frequency electric field 146 in a direction that
`is perpendicular to the top surface of the cathode 114. The
`magnetic field 142 and the high-frequency electric field 146
`intersect each other in a region 148 above the substrate 144.
`Electrons are trapped in the region 148 and collide with
`neutral atoms from the etching gas. These collisions gener-
`ate a high-density plasma 105. The negatively biased cath-
`
`

`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`3
`ode 114 attracts positively charged ions in the plasma 105
`with sufficient acceleration so that the ions etch a surface of
`the substrate 144.
`
`The RF power applied between the cathode 114 and the
`anode 130 has sufficient amplitude to ionize the etching gas
`and create the plasma 105 in the vacuum chamber 104. The
`plasma consists of positive ions and negative electrons. A
`typical RF driving voltage is between 500 V and 5000 V, and
`the distance 138 between the, cathode 114 and the anode 130
`is about 70 mm. Typical pressures are in the range 10 m Torr
`and 100 m Torr. Typical power densities are in the range of
`0.1 W/cm2 to 1 W/cm2. Typical plasma densities are 109
`cm‘3—10n cm‘3, and the electron temperature is on the
`order of 3 eV.
`
`The ionization process that generates the plasma 105 for
`sputter etching is sometimes referred to as direct ionization
`or atomic ionization by electron impact and can be described
`as follows:
`
`Ar+e’—>Ar*+2e’
`
`where Ar represents a neutral argon atom in the etching gas
`and e‘represents an ionizing electron generated in response
`to the voltage applied between the cathode 114 and the
`anode 130. The collision between the neutral argon atom and
`the ionizing electron results in an argon ion (Ar’') and two
`electrons.
`
`The plasma discharge is maintained by secondary electron
`emission from the cathode 114. However, typical operating
`pressures must be relatively high so that
`the secondary
`electrons are not lost to the anode 130 or the walls of the
`
`chamber 104. These pressures are not optimal for most
`plasma processes including plasma etching.
`The electrons, which cause the ionization, are generally
`confined by the magnetic fields produced by the magnets
`140. The magnetic confinement is strongest in a confinement
`region 148 where the magnetic field lines are parallel to the
`surface of the electrode. Generally, a higher concentration of
`positively charged ions in the plasma is present
`in the
`confinement region 148 than elsewhere in the chamber 104.
`Consequently, the substrate 144 is etched more rapidly in
`areas directly adjacent to the higher concentration of posi-
`tively charged ions. The rapid etching in these areas results
`in undesirable non-uniform etching of the substrate 144.
`Dramatically increasing the RF power applied to the
`plasma alone will not result in the formation of a more
`uniform and denser plasma that improves the etching uni-
`formity. Improved etching will not occur because the mag-
`netic field will be non-uniform across the electrode and the
`
`magnetic field distribution around the electrode will be
`insufficient
`to confine the electrons. Furthermore,
`the
`amount of applied power that is necessary to achieve a
`significant increase in uniformity can increase the probabil-
`ity of generating an electrical breakdown condition leading
`to an undesirable electrical discharge (an electrical arc) in
`the chamber 104.
`
`Pulsing the direct current (DC) power applied to the
`plasma can be advantageous since the average discharge
`power can remain low while relatively large power pulses
`are periodically applied. In addition,
`the duration of the
`voltage pulses can be chosen so as to reduce the probability
`of establishing an electrical breakdown condition. However,
`very large power pulses can still result
`in an electrical
`breakdown condition regardless of their duration. An unde-
`sirable electrical discharge will corrupt the etching process,
`cause contamination in the vacuum chamber 104, and can
`damage the substrate and/or any process layers already
`
`4
`fabricated. In addition, using a magnetron-type plasma gen-
`erator results in a magnetic field that significantly improves
`confinement. The electrons generated in a magnetron-type
`plasma generator will have a closed-loop path that generates
`an E><B drift current that significantly improves confine-
`ment.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment
`of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 according to the present invention. In one embodiment,
`the magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus 200
`can be configured for magnetically enhanced reactive ion
`etching. In another embodiment, the magnetically enhanced
`plasma processing apparatus 200 can be configured for
`sputter etching.
`The magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 includes a chamber 202, such as a vacuum chamber. The
`chamber 202 is coupled in fluid communication to a vacuum
`pump 204 through a vacuum valve 206. In one embodiment,
`the chamber 202 is electrically coupled to ground potential.
`The chamber 202 is coupled to a feed gas source 208 by
`one or more gas lines 207. In one embodiment, the gas lines
`207 are isolated from the chamber and other components by
`insulators 209. In addition, the gas lines 207 can be isolated
`from the feed gas source 208 using in-line insulating cou-
`plers (not shown). A gas flow control system 210 controls
`the gas flow to the chamber 202. The gas source 208 can
`contain any type of feed gas, such as argon.
`In some
`embodiments, the feed gas is a mixture of different gases.
`The different gases can include reactive and non-reactive
`gases. In one embodiment, the feed gas is a noble gas or a
`mixture of noble gases.
`A substrate 211 to be processed is supported in the
`chamber 202 by a substrate support 212. The substrate 211
`can be any type of work piece such as a semiconductor
`wafer. In one embodiment,
`the substrate support 212 is
`electrically coupled to an output 213 of a bias voltage source
`214. An insulator 215 isolates the bias voltage source 214
`from the chamber 202. In one embodiment, the bias voltage
`source 214 is an alternating current (AC) power source, such
`as a radio frequency (RF) power source. In other embodi-
`ments (not shown), the substrate support 212 is coupled to
`ground potential or is electrically floating.
`The magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 also includes a cathode 216. In one embodiment, the
`cathode 216 is formed of a metal. In one embodiment, the
`cathode 216 is formed of a chemically inert material, such
`as stainless steel. The distance from the cathode 216 to the
`
`substrate 211 can vary from a few centimeters to about one
`hundred centimeters.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`The cathode 216 is coupled to an output 222 of a matching
`unit 224. An insulator 226 isolates the cathode 216 from a
`
`grounded wall of the chamber 202. An input 230 of the
`matching unit 224 is coupled to a first output 232 of a pulsed
`power supply 234. A second output 236 of the pulsed power
`supply 234 is coupled to an anode 238. An insulator 240
`isolates the anode 238 from a grounded wall of the chamber
`202. Another insulator 242 isolates the anode 238 from the
`cathode 216.
`
`In one embodiment (not shown), the first output 232 of the
`pulsed power supply 234 is directly coupled to the cathode
`216. In one embodiment (not shown), the second output 236
`of the pulsed power supply 234 and the anode 238 are both
`coupled to ground. In one embodiment (not shown), the first
`output 232 of the pulsed power supply 234 couples a
`negative voltage impulse to the cathode 216. In another
`embodiment (not shown),
`the second output 236 of the
`pulsed power supply 234 couples a positive voltage impulse
`to the anode 238.
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`5
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 gener-
`ates peak voltage levels that are on the order of 5-10 kV. In
`one embodiment, operating voltages are between about 50 V
`and 1000 V. In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply
`234 sustains a discharge current level that is between about
`1A and about 5,000A depending on the volume of the
`plasma. Typical operating currents varying from less than
`about one hundred amperes to more than about a few
`thousand amperes depending on the volume of the plasma.
`In one embodiment,
`the pulses generated by the pulsed
`power supply 234 have a repetition rate that is below 1 kHz.
`In one embodiment, the pulse width of the pulses generated
`by the pulsed power supply 234 is substantially between
`about one microsecond and several seconds.
`
`The anode 238 is positioned so as to form a gap 244
`between the anode 238 and the cathode 216 that is sufficient
`
`to allow current to flow through a region 245 between the
`anode 238 and the cathode 216. In one embodiment, the
`width of the gap 244 is between approximately 0.3 cm and
`10 cm. The surface area of the cathode 216 and the dimen-
`
`sions of the gap determine the volume of the region 245. The
`dimensions of the gap 244 and the total volume of the region
`245 are parameters in the ionization process as described
`herein.
`
`An anode shield 248 is positioned adjacent to the anode
`238 and functions as an electric shield to electrically isolate
`the anode 238 from the plasma. In one embodiment, the
`anode shield 248 is coupled to ground potential. An insulator
`250 is positioned to isolate the anode shield 248 from the
`anode 238.
`
`The magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 also includes a magnet assembly 252.
`In one
`embodiment, the magnet assembly 252 is adapted to create
`a magnetic field 254 proximate to the cathode 216. The
`magnet assembly 252 can include permanent magnets 256,
`or alternatively, electromagnets (not shown). The configu-
`ration of the magnet assembly 252 can be varied depending
`on the desired shape and strength of the magnetic field 254.
`The magnet assembly 252 can have either a balanced or
`unbalanced configuration.
`In one embodiment, the magnet assembly 252 includes
`switching electro-magnets, which generate a pulsed mag-
`netic field proximate to the cathode 216.
`In some
`embodiments, additional magnet assemblies (not shown) are
`placed at various locations around and throughout the cham-
`ber 202 depending on the plasma process.
`In one embodiment, the magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus 200 is operated by generating the
`magnetic field 254 proximate to the cathode 216. In the,
`embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the permanent magnets 256
`continuously generate the magnetic field 254.
`In other
`embodiments, electro-magnets (not shown) generate the
`magnetic field 254 by energizing a current source that is
`coupled to the electro-magnets. In one embodiment,
`the
`strength of the magnetic field 254 is between about 50 and
`2000 gauss. After the magnetic field 254 is generated, the
`feed gas from the gas source 208 is supplied to the chamber
`202 by the gas flow control system 210.
`In one embodiment,
`the feed gas is supplied to the
`chamber 202 directly between the cathode 216 and the
`anode 238. Directly injecting the feed gas between the
`cathode 216 and the anode 238 can increase the flow rate of
`
`the gas between the cathode 216 and the anode 238. Increas-
`ing the flow rate of the gas allows longer duration impulses
`and thus, can result in the formation higher density plasmas.
`The flow of the feed gas is discussed further in connection
`with FIG. 3.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 is a
`component of an ionization source that generates a weakly-
`ionized plasma. The pulsed power supply 234 applies a
`voltage pulse between the cathode 216 and the anode 238.
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 applies a
`negative voltage pulse to the cathode 216. The amplitude
`and shape of the voltage pulse are chosen such that a
`weakly-ionized plasma is generated in the region 246
`between the anode 238 and the cathode 216.
`
`The weakly-ionized plasma is also referred to as a pre-
`ionized plasma. In one embodiment, the peak plasma density
`of the pre-ionized plasma is between about 106 and 1012
`cm‘3 for argon feed gas. In one embodiment, the pressure in
`the chamber varies from about 10‘3 to 10 Torr. The peak
`plasma density of the pre-ionized plasma depends on the
`properties of the specific plasma processing system.
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 gener-
`ates a low power pulse having an initial voltage of between
`about 100 V and 5 kV with a discharge current of between
`about 0.1A and 100A in order to generate the weakly-ionized
`plasma. In some embodiments the width of the pulse can be
`in on the order of about 0.1 microseconds to about one
`
`hundred seconds. Specific parameters of the pulse are dis-
`cussed herein in more detail.
`
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 applies
`a voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode 238 before
`the feed gas is supplied between the cathode 216 and the
`anode 238. In another embodiment, the pulsed power supply
`234 applies a voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode
`238 after the feed gas is supplied between the cathode 216
`and the anode 238.
`
`In one embodiment, a direct current (DC) power supply
`(not shown) is used to generate and maintain the weakly-
`ionized or pre-ionized plasma. In this embodiment, the DC
`power supply is adapted to generate a voltage that is large
`enough to ignite the pre-ionized plasma. In one embodiment,
`the DC power supply generates an initial voltage of several
`kilovolts between the cathode 216 and the anode 238 in
`
`order to generate and maintain the pre-ionized plasma. The
`initial voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode 238
`creates a plasma discharge voltage that is on the order of
`100-1000 V with a discharge current that is on the order of
`0.1 A—100 A.
`
`The direct current required to generate and maintain the
`pre-ionized plasma is a function of the volume of the
`plasma. In addition,
`the current required to generate and
`maintain the pre-ionized plasma is a function of the strength
`of the magnetic field in the region 245. For example, in one
`embodiment, the DC power supply generates a current that
`is between about 1 mA and 100 A depending on the volume
`of the plasma and the strength of the magnetic field in the
`region 245. The DC power supply can be adapted to generate
`and maintain an initial peak voltage between the cathode
`216 and the anode 238 before the introduction of the feed
`gas.
`(AC)
`In another embodiment, an alternating current
`power supply (not shown) is used to generate and maintain
`the weakly-ionized or pre-ionized plasma. For example, the
`weakly-ionized or pre-ionized plasma can be generated and
`maintained using electron cyclotron resonance (ECR),
`capacitively coupled plasma discharge (CCP), or inductively
`coupled plasma (ICP) discharge. An AC power supply can
`require less power to generate and maintain a weakly-
`ionized plasma than a DC power supply. In addition, the
`pre-ionized or weakly-ionized plasma can be generated by
`numerous other
`techniques, such as UV radiation
`techniques, X-ray techniques, electron beam techniques, ion
`
`

`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`7
`beam techniques, or ionizing filament techniques. In some
`embodiments, the weakly-ionized plasma is formed outside
`of the region 245 and then diffuses into the region, 245.
`Forming a weakly-ionized or pre-ionized plasma substan-
`tially eliminates the probability of establishing a breakdown
`condition in the chamber 202 when high-power pulses are
`applied between the cathode 216 and the anode 238. Uni-
`formly distributing the weakly-ionized or pre-ionized
`plasma over the cathode area results in a more uniform
`strongly ionized plasma when a high power pulse is applied.
`The probability of establishing a breakdown condition is
`substantially eliminated because the weakly-ionized plasma
`has a low-level of ionization that provides electrical con-
`ductivity through the plasma. This conductivity greatly
`reduces or prevents the possibility of a breakdown condition
`when high power is applied to the plasma.
`Once the weakly-ionized plasma is formed, high-power
`pulses are then generated between the cathode 216 and the
`anode 238. In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234
`generates the high-power pulses. The desired power level of
`the high-power pulse depends on sev

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket