throbber
HYBRID VEHICLES
`
`Inventors: Alex J. Severinsky
`Theodore N. Louckes
`
`
`This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No.
`09/264,817, filed March 9, 1999, now U. S. patent 6,209,672,
`issued
`April 3, 2001, which in turn claims priority from provisional
`application Ser. No.
`60/100,095, filed September 14, 1998, and is
`also a continuation-in—part of Ser. No; 09/392,743, filed September
`9, 1999, which in turn claims priority from provisional application
`Ser. No. 60/122,296, filed March 1, 1999.
`
`'
`
`o
`'o
`.This application relates to improvements in hybrid vehicles,
`that is, vehicles in which both an internal combustion engine and
`one or more electric motors are provided to supply torque to the
`driving wheels of the vehicle. More particularly, this invention
`relates to a hybrid electric vehicle that is fully competitive with
`presently conventional vehicles as regards performance, operating
`convenience, and cost, while achieving substantially improved fuel
`economy and reduced pollutant emissions.
`
`' c
`
`'
`e
`'o
`For many years great attention has been given to the problem
`of reduction of fuel consumption of automobiles and other highway
`vehicles. Concomitantly very substantial attention has been paid
`‘to reduction of pollutants emitted by automobiles
`and other
`vehicles. To a degree, efforts to solve these problems conflict
`with one another. For example,
`increased thermodynamic efficiency
`and thus reduced fuel consumption can be realized if an engine is
`operated at higher temperatures. Thus there has been substantial
`interest in engines built of ceramic materials withstanding higher
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 1 of 145
`Page 1 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC 1041
`
`

`

`combustion temperatures than those now in use. However, higher
`combustion temperatures in gasoline-fueled engines lead to increase
`in certain undesirable pollutants, typically NOx.
`'
`Another possibility for reducing emissions is to burn mixtures
`of gasoline and ethanol ("gasohol"), or straight ethanol. However,
`to date ethanol has not become economically competitive with
`gasoline, and consumers have not accepted ethanol
`to any great
`degree. Moreover,
`to make an alternate fuel
`such as ethanol
`available
`to the
`extent
`necessary
`to achieve
`appreciable
`improvements in nationwide air quality and fuel conservation would
`require immense costs for infrastructure improvements; not only the
`entire nation's motor fuel production and delivery system, but also
`the vehicle manufacture, distribution, and repair system, would
`have to be extensively revised or substantially duplicated.
`One proposal for reducing pollution in cities is to limit the
`use of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines and instead
`employ electric vehicles powered by rechargeable batteries. To
`date, all
`such “straight electric" cars have had very limited
`range,
`typically no more than 150 miles, have insufficient power
`for acceleration and hill climbing except when the batteries are
`substantially fully charged,
`and. require substantial
`time for
`battery recharging. Thus, while there are many circumstances in
`which the limited range and extended recharging time of
`the
`batteries would not be an inconvenience, such cars are not suitable
`for all the travel requirements of most individuals. Accordingly,
`an electric car would have to be an additional vehicle for most
`users, posing a substantial economic deterrent. Moreover, it will
`be appreciated that
`in the United States most electricity is
`ted in coal-fired. power plants,
`so that using electric
`genera
`f the pollution, but does not
`vehicles merely moves the source 0
`eliminate it. Furthermore, comparing the respective net costs per
`mile of driving, electric vehicles are not competitive with
`ethanol-fueled vehicles, much less with conVentional gasoline-
`fueled vehicles. See, generally, Simanaitis,
`
`"Electric Vehicles",
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 2 of 145
`Page 2 of 145
`
`.
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC 1041
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`“AC Propulsion
`Reynolds,
`Road & Track, May 1992, pp. 126-136;
`Road & Track, October 1992, pp. 126-129.
`CRX", Br°°ks et 31 U-S-
`h an electric
`patent 5,492,192 shows suc
`ed to incorporation of
`vehicle; the invention appears to be direct
`into an
`technologies
`antilock braking
`control
`and
`traction
`nventional electric vehicle.
`also been paid over
`the years
`to
`including internal combustion
`
`otherwise co
`Much attention has
`
`The simplest such
`—electric
`
`engines powering generators,
`lectric vehicles.
`range exhibited by simple e
`ral principle as diesel
`vehicles operate on the same gene
`st railroads.
`In such systems, an internal
`locomotives used by mo
`tor providing electric power to
`combustion engine drives a genera
`els of the vehicle.
`traction motors connected directly to the whe
`that
`no variable gear
`ratio
`the advantage
`This
`system has
`e and the wheels of the
`is required between the engin
`transmission
`vehicle.More particularly, an internal combustion engine produces zero
`e at zero engine speed (RPM)
`and reaches its torque peak
`torqu
`perating range. Accordingly, all
`somewhere in the middle of its 0
`n internal combustion engine (other
`than certain single—speed
`'
`les using friction or centrifugal
`and not useful for normal driving) require a variable—
`en the engine and the wheels, so that the
`eds and loads
`
`clutches,
`
`engine's torque ca
`some sort of clutch must be
`encountered. Further,
`m the wheels, allowing
`mechanically decoupled fro
`the engine can be
`and to allow
`is still running,
`the vehicle to stop while the engine
`t to the drive train while
`some slippage of the engine with respec
`starting from a stop.
`It would not be practical
`to provide a
`diesel locomotive, for example, with a multiple speed transmissi
`or
`a clutch. Accordingly,
`the additional
`complexity of
`the
`or
`and electric traction motors
`is accepted.
`
`Page 3 of 145
`Page3of145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1o41
`
`

`

`connected directly to the wheels; when it is desired that the train
`should accelerate,
`the diesel engine is simply throttled to
`increase the generator output and the train begins to move.
`The same drive system may be employed in a smaller vehicle
`such as
`an
`automobile or
`truck,
`but has
`several distinct
`disadvantages in this application. In particular, and as discussed
`in detail below in connection with Figs. 1 and 2, it is well known
`that
`a gasoline or other
`internal combustion engine is most
`efficient when
`producing
`near
`its maximum output
`torque.
`Typically,
`the number of diesel locomotives on a train is selected
`in accordance with the total tonnage to be moved and the grades to
`be overcome, so that all the locomotives can be operated at nearly
`full torque production. Moreover, such locomotives tend to be run
`at steady speeds for long periods of time. Reasonably efficient
`fuel use is thus achieved. However,
`such a direct drive vehicle
`would not achieve good fuel efficiency in typical automotive use,
`involving many short trips,
`frequent stops in traffic, extended
`low-speed operation and the like.
`So-called "series hybrid" electric vehicles have been proposed
`for automotive use, wherein batteries are used as energy storage
`devices, so that an internal combustion engine provided to power a
`generator can be operated in its most fuel—efficient output power
`range while still allowing the electric traction motor(s) powering
`the vehicle to be operated as required. Thus the engine may be
`loaded by supplying torque to a generator charging the batteries
`while supplying electrical power
`to the traction motor(s)
`as
`required, so as to operate efficiently. This system overcomes the
`limitations of electric vehicles noted above with respect
`to
`limited range and long recharge times.
`Thus, as compared to a
`internal
`combustion engine
`in a series hybrid electric
`delivers torque directly to the wheels,
`vehicle,
`torque is delivered from,the engine to the wheels via a
`serially connected generator used as
`a battery charger,
`the
`battery, and the traction motor. HOwever, energy transfer between
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 4 of 145
`Page 4 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC 1041
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`those compone
`
`a1 an interna
`
`Thus, series
`
`least approximately 25% of engine
`nts consumes at
`such components add substantially to the cost and
`power. Further,
`in particular, an electric motor capable of
`weight of the vehicle;
`t all expected demand, e.g.,
`to
`providing sufficient torque to mee
`during hill-
`allow reasonable performance under acceleration,
`climbing and the like,
`is rather heavy-and expensive.
`een immediately successful.
`hybrid vehicles have not b
`1 hybrid" approach is shown in U.S.
`A more promising "paralle
`Patent Nos. 3,566,717 and 3,732,751 to Berman et al. In Berman et
`1 combustion engine and an electric motor are matched
`through :1 complex gear
`train so that both can provide torque
`directly ix)
`the wheels,
`the vehicle being operated ill several
`Where the output of the internal combustion engine
`different modes.
`drive
`the vehicle
`("first mode
`is more
`than necessary to
`stant speed and excess power is
`operation") the engine is run at can
`to electrical
`converted by a first motor/generator
`("Speeder")
`the
`“second mode operation",
`energy for storage in a battery.
`In
`and is
`internal combustion engine drives the wheels directly,
`throttled. When more power is needed than the engine can provide,
`a second motor/generator or "torquer" provides additional torque as
`
`needed.
`
`Berman et a1 thus show two separate electric motor/generators
`red by the internal combustion engine;
`the "Speeder“
`separately powe
`while the "torquer" propels the vehicle
`charges the batteries,
`forward in traffic. This arrangement
`is a source of additional
`cost and difficulty, as two separate modes of engine
`complexity,
`Moreover,
`the operator must control
`the
`control are required.
`Such a complex
`sition between the several modes of operation.
`tran
`Automobiles
`automotive market.
`vehicle is unsuited for
`the
`n be no more complicated to operate
`intended for mass production ca
`and must be essentially "foolproof",
`resistant to damage that might be caused by operator
`is,
`that
`error. Further,
`the gea
`
`quite complex and difficult to manufacture economically. Berman et
`
`Page 5 of 145
`Page5of145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`al also indicate that one or even two variable—speed transmissions
`may be required; see, e.g., col. 3,
`lines 19 — 22 and 36 - 38 of
`patent 3,566,717, and col. 2,
`lines 53 - 55 of patent 3,732,751.
`Lynch et al patent 4,165,795 also shows an early parallel
`hybrid drive.
`Lynch argues that maximum fuel efficiency can be
`realized when a relatively small
`internal combustion engine is
`provided,
`such that when the engine is operated at an efficient
`speed, it produces approximately the average power required over a
`typical mission.
`The example given is of an engine producing 25
`hp maximum and 17 hp at its most efficient speed, about 2500 rpm.
`This is to be combined with an electric motor—generator of about 30
`peak hp. This vehicle requires a variable—ratio transmission to
`achieve reasonable performance. It appears that the engine is to be
`run continuously, at
`a
`steady speed, with additional
`torque
`provided by the motor when needed and excess torque produced by the
`engine being used to charge the batteries.
`In a first embodiment,
`torque provided by the motor
`is transmitted to the drive wheels
`through the engine, while in a second embodiment their respective
`positions are reversed.
`Nishida U.S. patent 5,117,931 shows a parallel hybrid vehicle
`where torque from an electric motor may be combined with torque
`from an internal combustion engine in a "torque transmission unit"
`comprising paired bevel gears
`and means
`for controlling the
`relative rates of rotation of the motor and engine, so that the
`motor can be used to start the engine, absorb excess torque from
`the engine
`(by
`charging a battery),
`or provide
`additional
`propulsive torque.
`A variable—speed transmission is coupled
`between the torque transmission unit and the propelling wheels.
`Both
`the
`torque
`transmission unit
`and
`the variable-speed
`transmission are complex, heavy, and expensive components,
`the use
`of which would preferably be avoided.
`Helling U.S. patent 3,923,115 also shows a hybrid vehicle
`having a torque transmission unit for combining torque from an
`electric motor and an internal combustion engine.
`However,
`in
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 6 of 145
`Page 6 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC 1041
`
`

`

`the motor and engine
`the relative rates of rotation of
`input shafts are fixed;
`a flywheel is provided to store excess
`to store excess electrical
`8,040 shows another hybrid
`' energy. Albright, Jr. et al patent 4,58
`drive scheme using a flywheel
`in addition to batteries to store
`excess energy; various complicated .mechanical connections are
`provided between the various components. Capacitors have also been
`proposed for energy storage; see Bates et a1 U.S. patent 5,318,142.
`Fjallstrfim U.S. patent 5,120,282 shows a parallel hybrid drive
`train wherein torque from two electric motors is combined with
`torque produced by an internal combustion engine; the combination
`
`including
`
`Hunt U.S. Patent Nos. 4,405,029 and 4,470,
`parallel hybrids requiring complex gearing arrangements,
`More specifically,
`the Hunt patents
`multiple speed transmissions.
`hybrid vehicles. Hunt
`disclose several embodiments of parallel
`lines 6 - 20 of the '476 patent)
`that an
`4,
`indicates (see col.
`t low speeds up to 20 mph,
`electric motor may drive the vehicle a
`and an internal combustion engine used for speeds above 20 mph,
`while "in certain speed ranges,
`such as from 15 — 30 mph, both
`Additionally, both power sources
`power sources may be energized...
`" Hunt also indicates
`could be utilized under heavy load conditions.
`that "the vehicle could be provided with an automatic changeover
`' e which automatically shifts from the electrical power source
`to the internal combustion power source, depending on the speed of
`the vehicle" (col. 4,
`lines 12 - 16).
`However,
`the Hunt vehicle does not meet the objects of the
`present invention, as discussed in detail below. Hunt's vehicle in
`each embodiment
`requires
`a conventional manual or automatic
`transmission. See col. 2,
`lines 6
`— 7. Moreover,
`the internal
`combustion engine is connected to the transfer case (wherein torque
`from the internal combustion engine and electric motor is combined)
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 7 of 145
`Page 7 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC 1041
`
`

`

`to provide additional torque and additional regenerative braking as
`needed.More particularly,
`the latter Kawakatsu patent asserts that
`a single electric motor sized to provide sufficient
`torque to
`propel
`the vehicle would not be capable of providing sufficient
`regenerative braking force; see col. 1,
`line 50 — col.
`2 line 8.
`Accordingly, Kawakatsu provides two separate motor/generators, as
`noted; a separate engine starting motor is also provided.
`See col.
`6,
`lines
`22
`-
`23.
`In the
`embodiment
`shown,
`the
`larger
`motor/generator is connected to the wheel drive shaft, while the
`engine and the smaller motor/generator are connected to the wheels
`through
`a
`complex mechanism comprising
`three
`separately-
`controllable clutches. See col. 5,
`lines 50 — 62.
`Numerous patents disclose hybrid vehicle drives tending to
`fall into one or more of the categories discussed above. A number
`of patents disclose systems wherein an operator is required to
`select between electric and internal combustion operation;
`for
`example,
`an electric motor
`is provided for operation inside
`buildings where exhaust fumes would be dangerous, and an internal
`combustion engine provided for operation outdoors.
`It is also
`known to propose a hybrid vehicle comprising an electric motor for
`use at low speeds, and an internal combustion engine for use at
`higher speed.
`The art also suggests using both when maximum torque
`is required.
`In several cases the electric motor drives one set of
`wheels and the internal combustion engine drives a different set.
`See generally Shea (4,180,138); Fields et a1 (4,351,405); Kenyon
`(4,438,342); Krohling (4,593,779); and Ellers (4,923,025).
`Many of these patents show hybrid vehicle drives wherein a
`variable speed transmission is required, as do numerous additional
`references. A transmission as noted above is typically required
`where the internal combustion engine and/or the electric motor are
`not capable of supplying sufficient torque at low speeds. See Rosen
`(3,791,473); Rosen (4,269,280); Fiala (4,400,997); and Wu et a1
`(4,697,660). Kinoshita (3,970,163)
`shows a vehicle of this general
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 8 of 145
`Page80f145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`type wherein a gas turbine engine is coupled to the road wheels
`through a three-speed transmission; an electric motor is provided
`to supply additional torque at low speeds.
`For further examples of series hybrid vehicles generally as
`discussed above, see Bray (4,095,664); Cummings (4,148,192); Monaco
`et
`al
`(4,306,156);
`Park
`(4,313,080); McCarthy
`(4,354,144);
`Heidemeyer
`(4,533,011); Kawamura
`(4,951,769); and Suzuki et a1
`(5,053,632). Various of.these address specific problems arising in
`the manufacture or use of hybrid vehicles, or specific alleged
`design improvements.
`For example, Park addresses certain specifics
`of battery charging and discharge characteristics, while McCarthy
`shows
`£1 complex drive system involving an internal combustion
`engine driving two electric motors;
`the torque generated by the
`latter is combined in a complex differential providing continuously
`variable gear ratios.
`Heidemeyer
`shows connecting an internal
`combustion engine to an electric motor by a first friction clutch,
`and connecting the motor to a transmission by a second friction
`
`clutch.
`
`other patents of general relevance to this subject matter
`include Toy
`(3,525,874),
`showing a series hybrid using a gas
`turbine as internal combustion engine; Yardney (3,650,345), showing
`use of
`:3 compressed-air or similar mechanical starter for the
`internal combustion engine of a series hybrid, such that batteries
`of
`limited current
`capacity could be used;
`and Nakamura
`(3,837,419), addressing improvements in thyristor battery—charging
`and motor drive circuitry.
`Somewhat further afield but of general
`interest are the disclosures of Deane
`(3,874,472); Horwinski
`(4,042,056); Yang
`(4,562,894); Keedy
`(4,611,466);
`and Lexen
`(4,815,334); Mori
`(3,623,568); Grady,
`Jr.
`(3,454,122); Papst
`(3,211,249); Nims et a1 (2,666,492); and Matsukata (3,502,165).
`Additional references showing parallel hybrid vehicle drive systems
`include Froelich (1,824,014) and Reinbeck (3,888,325).U.S. Patent
`4,578,955 to Medina shows a hybrid system wherein a gas turbine
`is used to drive»a generatbr as needed to charge batteries. Of
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`10
`
`Page 9 of 145
`Page90f145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`particular interest to certain aspects of the present invention is
`that Medina discloses that the battery pack should have a voltage
`in the range of 144,
`168 or 216 volts and the generator should
`deliver current in the range of 400 to 500 amperes. ThoSe of skill
`in the art will
`recognize that
`these high currents
`involve
`substantial resistance heating losses, and additionally require
`that all electrical connections be made by positive mechanical
`means such as bolts and nuts, or by welding. More specifically, for
`reasons of safety and in accordance with industry practice,
`currents in excess of about 50 amperes cannot be carried by the
`conventional
`plug-in
`connectors
`preferred
`for
`reasons
`of
`convenience and economy, but must be carried by much heavier, more
`expensive
`and
`less
`convenient
`fixed connectors
`(as used on
`conventional starter and battery cable connections). Accordingly,
`it would be desirable to operate the electric motor of a hybrid
`vehicle at lower currents.
`U.S. patent 5,765,656 to Weaver also shows a series hybrid
`wherein a gas turbine is used as the internal combustion engine;
`hydrogen is the preferred fuel.
`U.S. Patent No. 4,439,989 to Yamakawa shows a system wherein
`two different
`internal combustion engines are provided,
`so that
`only one need be run when the load is low. This arrangement would
`be complex and expensive to manufacture.
`Detailed discussion of various aspects of hybrid vehicle
`drives may be found in Kalberlah, "Electric Hybrid Drive Systems
`for Passenger Cars
`and Taxis",
`SAE Paper No.
`910247
`(1991).
`Kalberlah first compares "straight" electric, series hybrid, and
`parallel hybrid drive trains, and concludes that parallel hybrids
`are preferable, at least when intended for general use (that is,
`straight electric vehicles may be useful under certain narrow
`conditions of low—speed,
`limited range urban driving). Kalberlah
`pares various forms of parallel hybrids, with respect to
`4, and concludes that the most practical arrangement is
`'n which an internal combustion engine drives a first pair of
`
`then com
`
`-
`
`Page 10 of 145
`Page 10 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`the second; more particularly,
`and sum electric motor
`wheels,
`Kalberlah indicates that mechanical combination of the torque from
`an internal combustion engine and an electric motor is impractical.
`Gardner U.S.
`patents
`5,301,764
`and
`5,346,031
`follow
`Kalberlah's teachings,
`in that Gardner shows separately driving at
`least two pairs of wheels; one pair is driven by a first electric
`motor, and the second by a second electric motor or alternatively
`by a small internal combustion engine. Three different clutches
`are provided to allow 'various
`sources of drive torque to be.
`connected to the wheels,
`and to a generator, depending on the
`vehicle's operation mode.
`The internal combustion engine is run
`continuously, and provides the driving torque when the vehicle is
`in a cruise mode; at other times it is used to charge the batteries
`powering the electric motors.
`Bullock,
`"The Technological Constraints of Mass, Volume,
`Dynamic Power Range and Energy Capacity on the Viability of Hybrid
`and Electric Vehicles",
`SAE Paper No. 891659
`(1989) provides a
`detailed theoretical analysis of electric vehicles in terms of the
`loads thereon, and a careful analysis of the various battery types
`then available.
`Bullock. concludes that
`a ‘vehicle having 'two
`electric motors of differing characteristics, driving the wheels
`through a variable—speed transmission, would be optimal
`for
`automotive use;
`see the discussion of Fig.
`8.
`Bullock also
`suggests the use of an internal combustion engine to drive battery
`charging, but does not address combining the engine's torque with
`that from the motors; see pp. 24 - 25.
`Further related papers are collected in Elggtrig_ang_fiybrid
`yghigle_1§ghnglggy, volume SP-915, published by SAE in February
`1992.
`See also Wouk, "Hybrids: Then and Now"; Bates, "0n the road
`with a Ford HEV", and King et al, "Transit Bus takes the Hybrid
`Route", all in lEEE_§pggt;gm, Vol. 32, 7,
`(July 1995).
`Urban et a1 U.S. patent 5,667,029 shows two embodiments of
`parallel hybrids; a first embodiment is shown in Figs.
`1 — 9 and
`11, and a second in Figs. 12 - 17. Both embodiments have numerous
`
`12
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 11 of 145
`Page 11 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`including similar operating modes. Referring to
`common features,
`nal combustion engine provides torque
`the first embodiment, an inter
`to the road wheels or to a generator;
`two electric motors can
`provide torque to the road wheels, or charge batteries during
`Torque from the engine and motors
`is
`regenerative braking.
`-ratio transmission.
`the input shaft
`to a variable
`combined at
`to allow the engine's
`Overrunning clutches are provided, e.g.,
`torque to be applied to the road wheels wi
`motors.
`54, certain transitions
`lines 25.—
`indicated at col. 6,
`As
`between various operating modes are made automatically, responsive
`to the position of
`the accelerator pedal;
`for example,
`if the
`operator does not depress the pedal beyond a given point, only the
`internal combustion engine is employed to propel the vehicle;
`if
`the operator depresses the pedal more fully,
`the electric motors
`are also energized.
`other changes in the operational mode must be
`made by the operator directly;
`for example,
`the vehicle may be
`operated as a "straight electric" vehicle, e.g. for short duration
`rator's making an appropriate control action.
`See
`
`thout also rotating the
`
`trips, by the ope
`col. 7,
`lines 49 - 56.
`ffer from a number of
`The Urban et a1 design appears to su
`First,
`the internal combustion engine is
`significant defects.
`ded to accelerate the vehicle to
`stated to provide all torque nee
`cruising speed under normal circumstances (see col. 5,
`lines 3 -
`during cruising (see col. 6,
`10), and also to propel the vehicle
`The electric motors are to be used only during
`lines 48 — 54).
`5,
`lines 10 — 13. A 20
`rapid acceleration and hill—climbing; col.
`operated through a continuously variable—ratio
`horsepower engine,
`is stated to be adequate for
`transmission and a torque converter,
`learly complex and expensive;
`this purpose.
`Such components are c
`otoriously inefficient. Moreover,
`using the internal combustion engine as the sole source of power
`it to be run at low speeds,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 12 of 145
`Page120f145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`that excess
`(Various additional references suggest
`polluting.
`torque can be used to charge batteries; if this were incorporated
`in the tmban system,
`the engine might be run at a reasonably
`efficient output level while the vehicle was stationary, but this
`would lead to high levels of noise and vibration.
`In any event
`Urban does not appear to consider this possibility.)
`0n the other hand, Urban does suggest that the vehicle can be
`operated as a "straight.e1ectric" under low-speed conditions, but
`this requires the operator to provide an explicit control
`input;
`this complexity is unacceptable in a vehicle intended to be sold in
`quantity, as would be required in order to reach Urban's stated
`goals of reduction of atmospheric pollution and reduced energy
`consumption.
`As noted,
`hybrid vehicle operation must
`be
`essentially "foolproof", or "transparent" to the user,
`to have any
`chance of commercial success.
`Urban's second embodiment is mechanically simpler, employing
`but a single "dynamotor",
`through which torque is transmitted from
`the engine to the variable-ratio transmission, but suffers from the
`
`is directed to the
`A second Urban et al patent, 5,704,440,
`method of operation of the vehicle of the '029 patent and suffers
`the same inadequacies.
`Various articles describe several generations of Toyota Motor
`Company hybrid vehicles, believed to correspond to that available
`commercially as the "Prius". See, for example, Yamaguchi, "Toyota
`readies gasoline/electric hybrid system", Automotiyg_§nginggging,
`July 1997, pp. 55 — 58; Wilson, "Not Electric, Not Gasoline, But
`Both", Autgweek, June 2, 1997, pp.
`17 — 18; Bulgin,
`"The Future
`Works, Quietly", Autgmeek February 23, 1998, pp.
`12 and 13; and
`"Toyota Electric and Hybrid Vehicles", a Toyota brochure.
`A more
`detailed discussion of the Toyota vehicle's powertrain is found in
`Nagasaka et a1,
`"Development of
`the Hybrid/Battery ECU for the
`Toyota Hybrid System",
`SAE paper 981122
`(1998), pp.
`19
`s 27.
`According to the Wilson article, Toyota describes this vehicle as
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`30
`
`14
`
`Page 13 of 145
`Page 13 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`a "series-parallel hybrid"; regardless of the label applied, its
`powertrain appears to be similar to that of
`the Berman patents
`described above, that is, torque from either or both of an internal
`combustion engine and an electric motor are controllably combined
`in a "power-split mechanism" and transmitted to the drive wheels
`through a planetary gearset providing the functionality of
`a
`variable-ratio transmission.
`See the Nagasaka article at pp. 19 —
`
`20.
`
`Furutani U.S. patent 5,495,906 describes a vehicle having an
`internal combustion engine driving a first set of wheels through a
`variable-ratio transmission and an electric motor driving a second
`set of wheels. The engine is apparently intended to be
`run
`continuously; at
`low speeds,
`it drives a_generator
`to charge
`batteries providing energy to the motor, and at higher speeds the
`engine or both engine and motor propel
`the vehicle.
`In some
`circumstances the transmission may not be required; compare, for
`example, col. 3,
`lines 4 — 8 with col. 5,
`lines 59 - 64.
`U.S. patent 5,842,534 to Frank shows a "charge depletion“
`control method for hybrid vehicles;
`in this scheme,
`the internal
`combustion engine is essentially used only when the state of the
`batteries is such that
`the vehicle cannot otherwise reach a
`recharging point.
`See col. 3,
`lines 50 — 55.
`In normal operation,
`the batteries are recharged from an external power source.
`Frank
`also discusses
`two—mode brake pedal operation, wherein mechanical
`brakes are engaged in addition to regenerative braking when the
`pedal is depressed beyond a preset point.
`U.S. patent 5,823,280 to Lateur et al shows a parallel hybrid
`wherein the shafts of an internal combustion engine and first and
`second electric motors are all coaxial; the engine is connected to
`the first motor by a clutch, and the first motor to the second by
`a planetary gearset,
`allowing the speeds of
`the motors to be
`varied so as to operate them in their most efficient range.
`See
`col. 4,
`line 57 - col. 5,
`line 60.
`U.S. patent 5,826,671 to Nakae et a1 shows a parallel hybrid
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`15
`
`Page 14 of 145
`Page 14 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`wherein torque from an internal combustion engine is combined with
`that from a motor
`in a planetary gearset; a clutch is provided
`therebetween. The specific invention relates to sensing of engine
`warmup conditions, so as to limit emission of unburnt fuel and thus
`
`lower emissions.
`
`U.S. patent 5,846,155 to Taniguchi et a1 shows a parallel
`hybrid wherein torque from an internal combustion engine and a
`motor
`is again combined in a planetary gearset;
`the specific
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`30
`
`transmission.
`
`It will be appreciated by those of skill_in the art that there
`are significant
`limitations inherent
`in 'the use of planetary
`gearsets as a: means for connecting different sources, e.g.,
`an
`internal combustion engine and an electric motor,
`to the drive
`wheels of a vehicle, namely,
`that unless the planetary gearset is
`effectively locked (anathematic to its use as ea continuously-
`variable transmission, e.g.,
`in the Toyota vehicle) it is capable
`of additive combination of shaft speeds, but not of output torque.
`Hence,
`the principal advantage of the parallel hybrid drivetrain,
`additive combination of
`the output
`torque of both the electric
`motor and the internal combustion engine,
`is only available when
`the planetary gearset
`is locked.
`This fact
`is acknowledged by
`Lateur, for example, at col. 6,
`line 27.
`include U.S.
`Additional disclosures of possible interest
`patent 5,845,731 to Buglione et al; this patent issued December 8,
`1998, and therefore is not necessarily available as a reference
`against the claims of the present application. The basic powertrain
`shown by Buglione et a1 includes an internal combustion engine 12,
`coupled through a first clutch 18 to a first electric motor 20,
`coupled to a second electric motor 26 through a second clutch 24;
`the wheels are (apparently;
`see col. 3,
`line 8) driven by the
`second motor 26.
`The overall hybrid operational scheme provided by
`Buglione et a1 is illustrated in Fig. 4. At
`low speeds one or both
`motors may be used to propel
`the vehicle, with the engine off,
`
`16
`
`Page 15 of 145
`Page 15 of 145
`
`FMC 1041
`FMC1041
`
`

`

`During low—
`
`ruising the second motor propels the vehicle, while during
`high-speed cruising,
`the engine propels
`the vehicle.
`When
`acceleration is required at high speed,
`the engine and both motors
`may be used to propel the vehicle. Buglione et al also indicates
`that a variable-ratio transmission may be unnecessary, col. 3,
`line
`9, and that the first motor can be used to start the engine, col.
`4,
`lines 8 - 15.
`showing an "electrically
`U.S. patent 5,586,613 to Ehsani,
`peaking hybrid" vehicle is also of interest- Ehsani‘s vehicle is
`shown in several embodiments;
`in each, an engine is apparently to
`be
`run continuously, with excess
`torque used to charge the
`batteries,
`and one or more motors used to provide additional
`propulsive torque when the engine's output torque is inadequate. A
`transmission is provided in some embodiments of the Ehsani vehicle.
`An embodiment
`involving two motors is shown in Fig. 7, and can be
`modified as discussed in the text at col. 9,
`lines
`4 - 5. Fig. 7
`itself shows driving a first set of wheels by a first "electric
`machine", i.e., a motor capable of operation as a generator. This
`drive arrangement
`is independent of a second drive arrangement,
`whereby a second set of wheels is driven by an engine connected
`through a first clutch to a second electric machine, connected to
`the second set of wheels by a second clutch.
`Ehsani suggests at
`col. 9,
`lines 4 - 5 that the drive shaft otherwise coupled to the
`first electri

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket