throbber
HYBRID VEHICLES
`
`'Inventors: Alex J. Severinsky
`Theodore N. Louckes‘_
`
`
`This application is a continuation-in—part of Ser. No.
`09/264,817, filed March 9, 1999, now U. s. patent 6, 209, 672,
`issued
`April 3, 2001, which in turn claims priority from provisional
`applicatiOn Ser. No.
`60/100, 095, filed September 14,1998, and is
`also a continuation—in-part of Ser. No. 09/392, 743, filed September
`9, 1999, which in turn claims priority from provisional application
`Ser. No. 60/122,296, filed March 1, 1999.
`
`Eield-oof the xnventign
`This application relates to improvements in hybrid vehicles,
`that is, vehicles in which both an internal combustion engine and
`
`_driving wheels of the vehicle. More particularly, this invention
`relates to a hybrid electric vehicle that is fully competitive with
`presently conventional vehicles as regards performance, operating
`convenience, and cost, while achieving substantially improved fuel
`economy and reduced pollutant emissions.
`
`D SC 55 'on
`e
`'o
`t
`For many years great attention has been given to the problem
`of reduction of fuel consumption of automobiles and other highway
`vehicles. Concomitantly very substantial attention has been paid
`to reduction of pollutants emitted by automobiles
`and other
`vehicles. To a degree, efforts to solve these problems conflict
`with one another. For example,
`increased thermodynamic efficiency
`and thus reduced fuel consumption can be realized if an engine is
`operated at higher temperatures. Thus there has been substantial
`interest in engines built of ceramic materials withstanding higher
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 1 of 161
`Page 1 Of161
`
`-
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC1034
`
`

`

`combustion temperatures than those now in use. However, higher
`combustion temperatures in gasoline-fueled engines lead to increase
`in certain undesirable pollutants, typically NOX.
`~
`Another possibility for reducing emissions is to burn mixtures
`of gasoline and ethanol ("gasohol"), or straight ethanol. However,
`to date ethanol has not become economically competitive with
`gasoline,
`and consumers have not accepted ethanol
`to any great
`degree. Moreover,
`to make an alternate fuel
`such as ethanol'
`available
`to the
`extent necessary‘ to achieve
`appreciable
`improvements in nationwide air quality and fuel conservation would
`require immense costs for infrastructure improvements; not only the
`entire nation's motor fuel production and delivery system, but also
`the vehicle manufacture, distribution, and repair system, would
`have to be extensively revised or substantially duplicated.
`One proposal for reducing pollution in cities is to limit the
`use of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines and instead
`employ electric vehicles powered by rechargeable batteries. To
`~date, all such "straight electric" cars have had very limited
`range,
`typically no more than 150 miles, have insufficient power
`for acceleration and hill climbing exCept when the batteries are
`substantially fully" charged,
`and.
`require substantial
`time for
`battery recharging. Thus, while there are many circumstances in.
`which the limited range and extended recharging time of
`the
`batteries would not be an inconvenience, such cars are not suitable
`for all the travel requirements of most individuals. Accordingly,
`an electric car would have to be an additional vehicle for most
`users, posing a substantial economic deterrent. Moreover, it will '
`be appreciated that
`in the United States most electricity is
`generated in coal——fired. power' plants,
`so that using electric
`vehicles merely moves the source of the pollution, but does not
`eliminate it. Furthermore, comparing the respective net costs per
`mile of driving,. electric vehicles are not competitive with
`ethanol-fueled vehicles, much less with conventional gasoline-
`fueled vehicles. See, generally, Simanaitis, "Electric Vehicles",
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25’
`
`3O
`
`Page 2 of 161
`Page 2 of 161
`
`i
`
`' FMC 1034
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`"AC Propulsion
`
`Road & Track, May 1992, pp. 126-136; Reynolds,
`p. 126-129.
`, CRX", Road & Track, October 1992, p
`Brooks et a1 U.S. patent 5,492,192 shows such an electric
`pears to be directed to incorporation of
`vehicle; the invention ap
`control
`technologies
`into an
`antilock braking and
`traction
`_
`otherwise conventional electric vehicle.-
`to
`the _years
`Much attention has also been paid over
`internal combustion
`thus eliminating the defect of limited
`0 vehicles. The simplest such
`range exhibited by simple electri
`—electric
`general principle as diesel
`vehicles operate on the same
`In such systems, an internal
`locomotives used by most railroads.
`combustion engine drives a generator provi
`heels of the vehicle.
`traction motors connected directly to the w
`le gear
`ratio
`This
`system has
`the ;advantage that
`no variab
`transmission is required between the engine and the wheels of the
`
`vehicle.
`
`centrifugal
`
`More particularly, an internal combustion engine produces zero
`torque at zero engine speed (RPM)
`and reaches its torque peak
`,somewhere in the middle of its operating range. Accordingly, all
`bustion engine (other
`vehicles driven directly by an internal com
`single-speed vehicles using friction or
`than certain
`ing) require a variable-
`and not useful for normal driv
`clutches,
`nd the wheels, so that the
`ratio transmission between the engine a
`‘s torque can .be matched to 'th
`engine
`lutch must be provided so that
`encountered. Further,
`some sort of c
`decoupled from the wheels, allowing
`the engine can be mechanically
`and to allow
`the vehicle to stop while the engine is still running,
`the engine with respect to the drive train while
`some slippage of
`It would not be practical
`to provide a
`starting from a stop.
`with a multiple speed transmission,
`diesel locomotive, for example,
`the additional
`complexity of
`the
`a’ clutch. Accordingly,
`or
`erator
`and electric traction motors
`is accepted. Electric
`gen
`que at zero RPM and thus can be
`traction motors produce full tor
`
`e road speeds and loads
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 3 of 161
`Page 3 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC1034
`
`

`

`connected directly to the wheels; when it is desired that the train
`should accelerate,
`the diesel engine is simply throttled to
`increase the generator output and the train begins to move.
`The same drive system may be employed in a smaller vehicle
`as
`an
`automobile or
`truck,
`but has
`several distinct
`such
`disadvantages in this application. In particular, and as discussed
`in detail below in connection with Figs.
`1 and 2, it is well known
`.that
`a gasoline or other
`internal combustion engine is most
`efficient‘ when
`producing
`near
`its maximum output
`torque.
`Typically, the number of diesel locomotives on a train is selected
`in accordance with the total tonnage to be moved and the grades to
`be overcome, so that all the locomotives can be-operated at nearly
`full torque production. Moreover, such locomotives tend to be run
`at steady speeds for long periods of time. Reasonably efficient
`fuel use is thus achieved. However,
`such a direct drive vehicle
`would not achieve good fuel efficiency in typical automotive use,
`involving many short trips,
`frequent stops in traffic, extended
`low-speed operation and the like.
`So—called "series hybrid" electric vehicles have been proposed
`for automotive use, wherein batteries are used as energy storage
`devices, so that an internal combustion engine provided to power a
`generator can be operated in its most fuel-efficient output power
`range while still allowing the electric traction motor(s) powering
`the vehicle to be operated as required. Thus the engine may be
`loaded by supplying torque to a generator charging the batteries
`vniile supplying electrical power
`to the traction motor(s)
`as
`required, so as to operate efficiently. This system overcomes the
`limitations of electric ‘vehicles noted above with respect
`to
`limited range and long recharge times.
`Thus, as compared to a
`conventional vehicle, wherein the internal‘ combustion engine
`delivers torque directly to the wheels,
`in a series hybrid electric
`vehicle,
`torque is delivered from the engine to the wheels via a
`serially connected generator used as
`a battery charger,
`the
`battery, and the traction motor. However, energy transfer between
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 4 of 161
`Page 4 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`least approximately 25% of engine
`those components consumes at
`power. Further, such components add substantially to the cost and ,
`weight of the vehicle;
`in particular, an electric motor capable of
`providing sufficient torque to meet all expected demand, e.g.,
`to
`allow reasonable performance under acceleration,
`-during hill-
`climbing and the like, is rather heavy and expensive. Thus, series
`hybrid vehicles have not-been immediately successful.
`A more promising "parallel hybrid" approach is shown in U.S.
`Patent Nos. 3,566,717 and 3,732,751 to Berman et al. In Berman et
`al an internal combustion engine and an electric motor are matched
`through a: complex gear
`train so that both can provide torque
`directly to the wheels,
`the vehicle being operated in several
`different modes. Where the output of the internal combustion engine
`is more
`than necessary to drive the vehicle
`("first mode
`operation") the engine is run at constant speed and excess power is
`converted by a: first motor/generator
`("Speeder“)
`to electrical
`energy for storage in a battery.
`In "second mode operation",
`the
`internal combustion engine drives the wheels directly,
`and is
`throttled. When more power is needed than the engine can provide,
`a second motor/generator or "torquer“ provides additional torque as
`
`needed.
`Berman et a1 thus show two separate electric motor/generators
`separately powered by the internal combustion engine; the "speeder"
`charges the batteries, while the “torquer" propels the vehicle
`forward in traffic. This arrangement
`is a source of additional
`complexity, cost and difficulty, as two separate modes of engine
`control are required. Moreover,
`the operator must control
`the
`transition between the seVeral modes of operation.
`Such a complex
`vehicle is unsuited for
`the automotive market.
`Automobiles
`intended for mass production can be no more complicated to operate
`than conventional vehicles, and must be essentially "foolproof",
`that
`is, resistant to damage-that might be caused by operator
`error. Further,
`the gear train shown by Berman et al appears to be
`quite complex and difficult to manufacture economically. Berman et
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 5 of 161
`FMC 1034
`
` Page 5 of 161 FMC1034
`
`

`

`al also indicate that one or even two variable-speed transmissions
`may be required; see, e.g., col. 3,
`lines 19 — 22 and 36 - 38 of
`patent 3,566,717, and col. 2,
`lines 53 - 55 of patent-3,732,751.
`Lynch et a1 patent 4,165,795 also shows an early parallel
`hybrid drive.
`Lynch argues that maximum fuel efficiency can be
`realized when a relatively small
`internal combustion engine is
`provided,
`such that when the engine is operated at an efficient
`speed, it produces approximately the average power required over a
`typiCal mission.
`The example given is of an engine producing 25
`hp maximum and 17 hp at its most efficient speed, about 2500 rpm.
`This is to be combined with an electric motor—generator of about 30
`peak hp. This vehicle requires a variable—ratio transmission to
`achieve reasonable performance. It appears that the engine is to be
`run continuously, at
`a
`steady speed, with additional
`torque
`provided by the motor when needed and excess torque produced by the
`engine being used to charge the batteries.
`In a first embodiment,
`torque provided by the motor is transmitted to the drive wheels
`through the engine, while in a second embodiment their respective
`positions are reversed.
`Nishida U.S. patent 5,117,931 shows a parallel hybrid vehicle
`where torque from an electric motor may be combined with torquen
`from an internal combustion engine in a "torque transmission unit"
`comprising paired bevel gears
`and 'means
`for controlling the
`relative rates of rotation of the motor and engine, so that the
`motor can be used to start the engine, absorb excess torque from
`the engine
`(by
`charging a battery),
`or provide additional_
`propulsive torque.
`A 'variable—speed transmission is coupled
`between the torque transmission unit and the propelling wheels.
`Both
`the
`torque
`transmission unit
`and
`the
`variable—speed
`transmission are complex, heavy, and expensive components,
`the use
`of which would preferably be avoided.
`Helling U.S. patent 3,923,115 also shows a hybrid vehicle
`having a torque transmission unit for combining torque from an
`electric motor and an internal combustion engine.
`However,
`in
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 6 of 161
`Page 6 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC’1034
`
`

`

`the motor and engine
`Helling the relative rates of rotation of
`input shafts are fixed,
`a flywheel is provided to store excess
`mechanical energy as well as a battery to store excess electrical
`energy. Albright, Jr. et a1 patent 4,588,040 shows another hybrid
`
`excess energy; various complicated mechanical connections are
`provided between the various components. Capacitors have also been
`proposed for energy storage; see Bates et a1 U. S patent 5,318,142.
`Fjallstrom U. S. patent 5,120,282 shows a parallel hybrid drive
`rtrain wherein torque from two electric motors is combined with
`torque produced by an internal combustion engine; the combination
`is performed by a complex arrangement of paired planetary gearsets,
`and unspecified control means are alleged to be able to allow
`variation of road speed without a variable—ratio transmission.
`Hunt U.S. Patent Nos. 4,405,029 and 4,470,476 also disclose
`parallel hybrids requiring complex gearing arrangements,
`including
`multiple speed transmissions. More specifically,
`the Hunt patents
`disclose several embodiments of parallel hybrid vehicles. Hunt
`indicates (see col. 4,
`lines 6 - 20 of the '476 patent) that an
`electric motor may drive the vehicle at low speeds up to 20 mph,
`and an internal combustion engine used for speeds above 20 mph,
`while "in certain speed ranges,
`such as from 15 — 30 mph, both
`power sources may be energized... Additionally, both-power sources
`could be utilized under heavy load conditions." Hunt also indicates
`that "the vehicle could be provided with an automatic changeover
`device which automatically shifts from the electrical power source
`to the internal combustion power source, depending on the speed of
`
`the vehicle" (col. 4,
`lines 12 — 16).
`'However,
`the Hunt vehicle does not meet the objects of the
`present invention, as discussed in detail below. Hunt's vehicle in
`each embodiment
`requires
`a conventional manual or automatic
`transmission. See col. 2,
`lines 6
`— 7. Moreover,
`the internal
`combustion engine is connected to the transfer case (wherein torque
`from the internal combustion engine and electric motor is combined)
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 7 of 161
`Page 7 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`conventional
`torque‘ converter of
`"fluid coupling. or
`a
`by
`construction". Col. 2,
`lines 16 - 17. Such transmissions and fluid
`couplings or torque converters are very inefficient, are heavy,
`bulky, and costly, and are to be eliminated according to one object
`of the present invention, again as discussed in detail below.
`Furthermore,
`the primary means of battery charging disclosed
`by Hunt involves a further undeSirable complexity, namely a turbine
`driving the electric motor in generator configuration. The turbine
`is fueled by waste heat from the internal combustion engine. See
`col. 3,
`lines 10 - 60; Hunt's internal combustion engine is also
`fitted- with an alternator,
`for additional battery charging
`capability, adding yet further compleXity' Thus it is clear that
`Hunt fails to teach a hybrid vehicle meeting the objects of the
`present
`invention - that
`is,
`a hybrid vehicle competitive with
`conventional vehicles with respect
`to performance,
`cost
`and
`complexity, while achieving substantially improved fuel efficiency.
`Kawakatsu U. S. Patents Nos. 4, 305, 254 and 4,407,132 show a
`parallel hybrid involving a single internal combustion engine‘
`coupled to the drive wheels through a conventional variable—ratio
`transmission,
`an electric 'motor,
`and. an alternator,
`to allow _
`efficient use of the internal combustion engine. As in the Hunt
`disclosure,
`the engine is intended to be operated in a relatively
`‘ efficient range of engine speeds; when it produces more torque than
`is needed to propel the vehicle,
`the excess is used to charge the
`batteries; where the engine provides insufficient torque,
`the motor
`
`is energized as well.
`shows a hybrid
`A further Kawakatsu patent, No. 4, 335, 429,
`vehicle,
`in this case comprising an internal combustion engine and
`'two motor/generator units.
`A first larger motor/generator, powered
`by ea battery,
`is used"
`to provide additional
`torque when that
`provided by the engine is insufficient,
`the larger motor—generator
`. also converts excess torque provided by the engine into electrical
`energy,
`to be stored by the battery,_and is used in a regenerative
`braking mode.
`The second smaller motor/generator is similarly used
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25-
`
`30
`
`Page 8 of 161
`Page 8 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`to provide additional torque and.additional regenerative braking as
`
`needed.
`the latter Kawakatsu patent asserts that
`More particularly,
`a single electric motor sized to provide Sufficient
`torque to
`propel the vehicle would not be capable of providing sufficient
`regenerative braking force; see col. 1,
`line 504- col.
`2 line 8.
`Accordingly, Kawakatsu provides two separate motor/generators, as
`noted; a separate engine starting motor is also provided." See col.
`6,
`lines» 22'
`-
`23.
`In the
`embodiment
`shown,
`ther larger
`motor/generator is connected to the wheel drive shaft, while the
`engine and the smaller motor/generator are connected to the wheels
`through ‘a
`complex ~mechanism comprising
`three: separately-
`controllable clutches. See col. 5,
`lines 50 — 62.
`Numerous patents disclose hybrid Vehicle drives tending to
`fall into one or more of the categories discussed above. A number
`of patents disclose systems wherein an operator is required to
`select between electric and internal combustion operation;
`for
`~ example,
`an electric motor
`is provided' for operation inside
`buildings where exhaust fumes would be dangerous, and an internal
`combustion engine provided for operation outdoors.
`It is also
`known to propose a hybrid vehicle comprising an electric motor for
`use at low speeds, and an internal combustion engine for use at
`higher speed. The art also suggests using both when maximum torque-
`is required.
`In several cases the electric motor drives one set of
`wheels and the internal combustion engine drives a different set.
`See generally Shea (4,180,138); Fields et a1 (4,351,405); Kenyon
`(4,438,342); Krohling (4,593,779); and Ellers (4,923,025).
`Many of these patents show hybrid vehicle drives wherein a
`variable speed transmission is required, as do numerous additional
`references. A transmission as noted above is typically required
`' where the internal combustion engine and/or the electric motor are
`not capable of supplying sufficient torque at low speeds. See Rosen
`(3,791,473); Rosen (4,269,280); Fiala (4,400,997); and Wu et a1
`.(4,697,660). Kinoshita (3,970,163)
`shows a vehicle of this general
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`.25
`
`30
`
`Page 9 of 161
`Page 9 of 161
`
`‘
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC1034
`
`

`

`type wherein a gas turbine engine is coupled to the road wheels
`- through a three-speed transmission; an electric motor is provided
`to supply additional torque at low speeds.
`._
`For further examples of series hybrid vehicles generally as
`discussed above, see Bray (4,095,664); Cummings (4,148,192); Monaco
`et‘
`a1
`(4,306,156);
`Park
`(4,313,080); McCarthy" (4,354,144);
`Heidemeyer
`(4,533,011); Kawamura
`(4,951,769);
`and Suzuki et al
`(5,053,632). Various of these address specific problems arising in
`the manufacture or use of hybrid vehicles, or specific alleged
`design improvements.
`For example, Park addresses certain specifics
`of battery charging and discharge characteristics, while McCarthy
`shows
`a: complex drive system involvingcan internal combustion
`engine driving two electric motors;
`the torque generated by the
`latter is combined in a complex differential providing continuously
`variable gear ratios.
`Heidemeyer
`shows connecting an internal
`combustion engine to an electric motor by a first friction Clutch,
`and connecting the motor to a transmission by a second friction
`clutch.
`.
`.
`Other patents of general relevance to this subject matter
`include Toy
`(3,525,874),
`showing a series hybrid using a gas
`turbine as internal combustion engine; Yardney (3,650,345), showing
`use of a cmmpressed-air or similar mechanical starter for the
`internal combustion engine of a series hybrid, such that batteries
`of
`limited current
`capacity could be used;
`and Nakamura
`(3,837,419), addressing improvements in thyristor battery—charging
`and motor drive circuitry.
`Somewhat further afield but of general
`interest are the disclosures of
`‘Deane
`(3,874,472); Horwinski'
`"(4,042,056); Yang
`(4,562,894); Keedy
`(4,611,466);
`and Lexen
`(4,815,334); Mori
`(3,623,568); Grady,
`Jr. 4(3,454,122); Papst
`(3,211,249); Nims et al
`(2,666,492); and Matsukata (3,502,165).
`Additional references showing parallel hybrid vehicle drive systems
`include Froelich (1,824,014) and Reinbeck (3,888,325).U.S. Patent
`No. 4,578,955 to Medina shows a hybrid system wherein a gas turbine
`is used to driveia generator as needed to charge batteries. Of
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`particular interest to certain aspects of the present invention is
`that Medina discloses that the battery pack should have a voltage
`in the range of 144, 168 or 216 volts and the generator should
`deliver current in the range of 400 to 500 amperes. Those of skill
`in the art will
`recognize that
`these high currents
`involve
`substantial resistance heating losses,
`and additionally require
`that all electrical connections be made by positive mechanical
`means such as bolts and nuts, or by welding. More specifically, for
`reasons of safety and in accordance with industry practice,
`currents in excess of about 50 amperes cannot be carried by the
`conventional
`plug-in
`connectors
`preferred
`for
`reasOns
`of
`convenience and economy, but must be carried by much heavier, more
`expensive and
`less
`convenient
`fixed connectors
`(as used on
`conventional starter and battery cable connections) Accordingly,
`it would be desirable to operate the electric motor of a hybrid
`vehicle at’ lower currents.
`U. S. patent 5, 765, 656 to Weaver also shows a series hybrid
`wherein a gas turbine is used as the internal combustion engine;
`hydrogen is the preferred fuel.
`U.S. Patent No. 4, 439, 989 to Yamakawa shows a system wherein
`two different
`internal combustion engines are provided,
`so that
`only one need be run when the load is low. This arrangement would
`be complex and expensive to. manufacture.
`Detailed discussion of
`'various aspects of hybrid 'vehicle
`drives may be found in Kalberlah, "Electric Hybrid Drive Systems
`for Passenger Cars
`and Taxis",
`SAE Paper No.
`910247
`(1991).
`Kalberlah first compares "straight" electric, series'hybrid, and
`parallel hybrid drive trains, and concludes that parallel hybrids
`are preferable, at least when intended for general use (that is,
`straight electric vehicles may be useful under certain narrow
`conditions of low-speed,
`limited range urban driving). Kalberlah
`then compares various forms of parallel hybrids, with respect to
`his Fig. 4, and concludes that the most practical arrangement is
`one in which an internal combustion engine drives a first pair of
`
`11
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 11 of 161
`Page 11 of 161
`
`FMC1034
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`more particularly,
`the second;
`and EH1 electric motor
`wheels,
`Kalberlah indicates that mechanical combination of the torque from
`an internal combustion engine and an electric motor is impractical.
`Gardner U.S.
`patents
`5,301,764
`and
`5,346,031
`follow
`Kalberlah's teachings,
`in that Gardner shows separately driving at
`least two pairs of wheels; one pair is driven by a first electric
`motor, and the second by a second electric motor or alternatively
`by a small internal combustion engine. Three different clutches
`are provided to allow ‘various sources 'of drive torque to be.
`connected to the wheels,
`and to a generator, depending on the
`vehicle's operation mode.
`The internal combustion engine is run
`continuously, and provides the driving torque when the vehicle is
`in a cruise mode; at other times it is used to charge the batteries
`powering the electric motors.
`Bullock,
`“The Technological Constraints of Mass, Volume,
`Dynamic Power Range and Energy Capacity on the Viability of Hybrid
`and Electric Vehicles",
`SAE Paper No. 891659 (1989) provides a
`‘ detailed theoretical analysis of electric vehicles in terms of the
`loads thereon, and a careful analysis of the various battery types
`then available.
`Bullock concludes that
`ii vehicle having two
`electric motors of differing characteristics, driving the wheels
`through a variable-speed tranSmission, would be optimal
`for
`automotive use;
`see the discussion of Fig.
`8.
`Bullock also
`suggests the use of an internal combustion engine to drive battery
`charging, but does not addreSs combining the engine's torque with
`that from the motors; see pp. 24 - 25.
`Further related papers are collected in Electric and Hybrid
`ec
`o o
`, volume SP-915, published by SAE in February
`e 'c
`See also Wouk, "Hybrids: Then and Now"; Bates, "0n the road
`1992.
`with a Ford HEV", and King et a1, "Transit Bus takes the Hybrid
`Route", all in l§E§_§pggtrpm, Vol. 32, 7,
`(July 1995).
`Urban et al U.S. patent 5,667,029 shows two embodiments of
`parallel hybrids; a first embodiment is shown in Figs.
`1 - 9 and
`11, and a second in Figs. 12 - 17. Both embodiments have numerous
`
`10
`
`15
`
`2O
`
`25
`
`30
`
`12
`
`Page 12 of 161
`Page 12 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`FMC1034
`
`

`

`-Referring to
`including similar operating modes.
`common features,
`the first embodiment, an internal combustion engine provides torque
`to the road wheels or to a generator;
`two electric motors can
`provide torque to the road wheels, or charge batteries during
`regenerative braking.v_ Torque from the; engine and motors
`is
`combined at
`the input shaft
`to a variable-ratio transmission.
`Overrunning clutches are provided, e.g.,
`to allow the engine's
`torque to be applied to-the road wheels without also rotating the
`
`motors.
`lines 25 — 54, certain transitions
`indicated at col. 6,
`As
`between various operating modes are made automatically, responsive
`to the position of
`the accelerator pedal;
`for example,
`if the
`operator does not depress the pedal beyond a given point, only the
`internal combustion engine is employed to propel the vehicle; if
`the operator depresses the pedal more fully,
`the electric motors
`are also energized.
`other changes in the operational mode must be
`made by the operator directly;
`for example,
`the vehicle may be
`operated as a "straight electric" vehicle, e.g. for short duration
`trips, by the operator's making an appropriate control action.
`See
`col° 7,
`lines 49 - 56.
`The Urban et al design appears to suffer from a number of
`‘significant defects.
`First,
`the internal combustion engine is
`stated to provide all torque needed to accelerate the vehicle to
`cruising speed under normal circumstances (see col. 5,
`lines 3 -
`10), and also to propel the vehicle during cruising (see col. 6,
`lines 48 - 54).
`The electric motors are to be used only during
`rapid acceleration and hill-climbing; col. 5,
`lines 10 - 13._A 20
`horsepower engine, operated through a continuously variable—ratio
`transmission and a torque converter,
`is stated to be adequate for
`this purpose.
`Such components are clearly complex and expensive;
`further,
`torque converters are notoriously inefficient. Moreover,
`using the internal combustion engine as the sole source of power
`for low-speed running would require it to be run at.1ow speeds,
`e.g., at traffic lights, which is very inefficient and highly
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`13
`
`Page 13 of 161
`
`FMC 1034
`
`

`

`that excess
`(Various additional references suggest
`polluting.
`torque can be used to charge batteries; if this were incorporated
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`-
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`efficient output level while the vehicle was stationary, but this
`would lead to high levels of noise and vibration.
`In any event
`Urban does not appear to consider this possibility.)
`;
`'
`On the other hand, Urban does Suggest that the vehicle can be
`operated as a "straight electric" under low-speed conditions, but
`this requires the operator to provide an explicit control
`input;
`this complexity is unacceptable in a vehicle intended to be sold in
`quantity, as Would be required in order to reach Urbanfs stated
`goals of reduction of atmospheric pollution and reduced energy
`consumption.
`As noted,
`hybrid vehicle operation must
`be
`essentially "foolproof", or "transparent" to the user,
`to have any
`chance of commercial success.
`Urban's.second embodiment is mechanically simpler, employing
`but a single "dynamotor",
`through which torque is transmitted from
`h the engine to the variable-ratio transmission, but suffers from the
`same operational deficiencies.
`A second Urban et al patent, 5,704,440,
`is directed to the
`method of operation of the vehicle of the '029 patent and suffers
`the same inadequacies.
`Various articles describe several generations of Toyota Motor
`‘ Company hybrid vehicles, believed to correspond to that available
`commercially as the "Prius"°
`See, for example, Yamaguchi, "Toyota
`readies gasoline/electric hybrid system", Automotiye Engineering,
`July 1997, pp. 55 - 58; Wilson, "Not Electric, Not Gasoline, But
`Both", Autgmeek, June 2, 1997, pp.
`17 - 18; Bulgin,
`"The Future
`Works, Quietly", Autoweeh February 23, 1998, pp.
`12 and 13; and
`"Toyota Electric and Hybrid Vehicles", a Toyota brochure.
`A more
`detailed discussion of the TOydta vehicle's powertrain is found in
`Nagasaka et a1,
`"Development of
`the Hybrid/Battery ECU for the
`Toyota Hybrid System",
`SAE paper 981122
`(1998), pp.
`19
`- 27.
`According to the Wilson article, Toyota describes this vehicle as
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`‘Page14of161 FMC1034 '
`Page 14 of 161
`FMC 1034
`
`
`
`

`

`a "series-parallel hybrid"; regardless of the label applied, its
`powertrain appears to be similar to that of the Berman patents
`described above, that is,
`torque from either or both of an internal
`combustion engine and an electric motor are controllably combined
`in a "power-split mechanism" and transmitted to the drive wheels
`through a planetary gearset providing the functionality of
`a
`variable-ratio transmission.
`See the Nagasaka article at pp. 19 -
`
`20.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`internal combustion engine driving a first set of wheels through a
`variable-ratio transmission and an electric motor driving a second
`set of wheels. The engine is apparently intended to be run
`continuously; at
`low speeds,
`it drives a generator
`to charge
`batteries providing energy to the motor, and at higher speeds the
`engine or both engine and motor propel
`the vehicle.
`In some
`circumstances the transmission may not be required; compare, for
`example, col. 3,
`lines 4 — 8 with col. 5,
`lines 59 — 64.
`U.S. patent 5,842,534 to Frank shows a "charge depletion"
`control method for hybrid vehicles;
`in this scheme,
`the internal
`combustion engine is essentially used only when the state of the
`batteries is such that
`the vehicle cannot otherwise reach' a
`recharging point.
`See col. 3,
`lines 50'- 55.
`In normal Operation,
`the batteries are recharged from an external power source.
`Frank
`also discusses
`two—mode brake pedal operation, wherein mechanical
`brakes are engaged in addition to regenerative braking when the
`pedal is depressed beyond a preSet point.
`U.S. patent 5,823,280 to Lateur et a1 shows a parallel hybrid
`wherein the shafts of an internal combustion engine and first and
`second electric motors are all coaxial;
`the engine is connected to
`the first motor by a clutch, and the first motor to the second by
`a planetary gearset,
`allowing the speeds of
`the motors to be
`varied so as to_operate them in their most efficient range.
`See
`col. 4,
`line 57 - col. 5,
`line 60.
`U.S. patent 5,826,671 to Nakae et a1 shows a parallel hybrid
`
`15
`
`Page 15 of 161
`Page150f161
`
`FMC 1034
`‘ FMC1034
`
`

`

`wherein torque from an internal combustion engine is combined with
`that
`from a motor
`in a planetary gearSet; a clutch is provided
`therebetween. The specific invention relates to sensing of engine
`warmup conditions, so as to limit emission of unburnt fuel and thus
`
`U.S. patent 5,846,155 to Taniguchi et a1 shows a parallel
`hybrid wherein torque from an internal combustion engine and a
`motor'
`is again combined in a planetary gearset;
`the specific
`
`'10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`transmission.
`
`It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that there
`are significant
`limitations inherent
`:hi
`the- use of planetary
`gearsets as a means for connecting different sources, e.g.,
`an
`internal combustion engine and an electric motor,
`to the drive
`wheels of a vehicle, namely, that unl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket