throbber
PCT
`
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`International Bureau
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(51) International Patent Classification 7 =
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`
`W0 (IO/15455
`
`B60K
`
`A2
`
`.
`.
`.
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`23 March 2000 (23.03.00)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US99/ 18844
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`10 September 1999 (10.09.99)
`
`(81) Designated States: AU, BR, CA, CN, CZ, IL, JP, KR, LV,
`MX, PL, UA, Eurasian patent (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD,
`RU, TJ, TM), European patent (AT, BE, CH, CY. DE. DK.
`ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, IE, IT, LU, MC, NL, PT, SE).
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`60/100,095
`60/ 122,296
`09/264,817
`
`14 September 1998 (14.09.98)
`1 March 1999 (01.03.99)
`9 March 1999 (09.03.99)
`
`US Published
`US
`Without international search report and to be republished
`US
`upon receipt of that report.
`
`4
`
`(71) Applicant: PAICE CORPORATION [US/US]; Suite 315, 8605
`Cameron Street, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors: SEVERINSKY, Alex, J.; 4707 Foxhall Crescent,
`Washington, DC 20007 (US). LOUCKES, Theodore; 10398
`Appomattox, Holly, MI 48442 (US).
`
`(74) Agent: DE ANGELI, Michael; Suite 330, 1901 Research
`Boulevard, Rockville, MD 28050 (US).
`
`(54) Title: HYBRID VEHICLES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`A hybrid vehicle comprising an internal combustion engine controllably coupled to road wheels of the vehicle by a clutch, a traction
`motor coupled to road wheels of said vehicle, a starting motor coupled to the engine, both motors being operable as generators, a battery
`bank for providing electrical energy to and accepting energy from said motors, and a microprocessor for controlling these components is
`operated in different modes, depending on the vehicle’s instantaneous torque requirements, the state of charge of the battery bank, and
`other operating parameters. The mode of operation is selected by the microprocessor in response to a control strategy resulting in improved
`fuel economy and reduced emission. The engine may be fitted with a turbocharger operated in response to a control signal for extended
`high—load operation.
`
`FMC 1004
`Page 1 of 102
`FMC 1004
`Page 1 of 102
`
`Page 1 of 102
`
`

`

`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`ES
`FI
`FR
`GA
`GB
`GE
`GH
`GN
`GR
`HU
`IE
`IL
`IS
`IT
`JP
`KE
`KG
`KP
`
`KR
`KZ
`LC
`LI
`LK
`LR
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`Iceland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People’s
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`LS
`LT
`LU
`LV
`MC
`MD
`MG
`MK
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`PT
`RO
`RU
`SD
`SE
`SG
`
` AL
`
`AM
`AT
`AU
`AZ
`BA
`BB
`BE
`BF
`BG
`BJ
`BR
`BY
`CA
`CF
`CG
`CH
`CI
`CM
`CN
`CU
`CZ
`DE
`DK
`EE
`
`Albania
`Armenia
`Austria
`Australia
`Azerbaijan
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`Belgium
`Burkina Faso
`Bulgaria
`Benin
`Brazil
`Belarus
`Canada
`Central African Republic
`Congo
`Switzerland
`Cote d’Ivoire
`Cameroon
`China
`Cuba
`Czech Republic
`Germany
`Denmark
`Estonia
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`Slovenia
`SI
`Lesotho
`Slovakia
`SK
`Lithuania
`SN
`Senegal
`Luxembourg
`Swaziland
`52
`Latvia
`TD
`Chad
`Monaco
`TG
`Togo
`Republic of Moldova
`TJ
`Tajikistan
`Madagascar
`TM
`Turkmenistan
`The former Yugoslav
`TR
`Turkey
`Republic of Macedonia
`TT
`Mali
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Ukraine
`UA
`Mongolia
`Mauritania
`UG
`Uganda
`US
`United States of America
`Malawi
`UZ
`Uzbekistan
`Mexico
`Viet Nam
`VN
`Niger
`YU
`Netherlands
`Yugoslavia
`ZW
`Zimbabwe
`Norway
`New Zealand
`Poland
`Portugal
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Sudan
`Sweden
`Singapore
`
`Page 2 of 102
`Pa
`e2of102
`
`Page 2 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`
`
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99Z18844
`
`HYBRID VEHICLES
`
`E' J:
`
`E
`
`I]
`
`l'
`
`4‘
`
`This application relates to improvements in hybrid vehicles,
`
`that is, vehicles in which both an internal combustion engine and
`
`one or more electric motors are provided to supply torque to the
`
`driving wheels of the vehicle. More particularly, this invention
`
`relates to a hybrid electric vehicle that is fully competitive
`
`with presently conventional vehicles as regards performance,
`
`operating convenience, and cost, while achieving substantially
`
`10
`
`improved fuel economy and reduced pollutant emissions.
`
`'scuss'on of
`
`e
`
`'or
`
`For many years great attention has been given to the
`
`problem of reduction of fuel consumption of automobiles and other
`
`15
`
`highway vehicles. Concomitantly very substantial attention has
`
`been paid to reduction of pollutants emitted by automobiles and
`
`other vehicles. To a degree, efforts to solve these problems
`
`conflict with one another. For example,
`
`increased thermodynamic
`
`efficiency and thus reduced fuel consumption can be realized if
`
`20
`
`an engine is operated at higher temperatures. Thus there has been
`
`substantial
`
`interest
`
`in engines built of ceramic materials
`
`withstanding higher combustion temperatures than those now in
`
`use. However, higher combustion temperatures in gasoline—fueled
`
`engines lead 113
`
`increase le certain undesirable pollutants,
`
`25
`
`typically NOX.
`
`Another possibility for
`
`reducing emissions
`
`is to burn
`
`mixtures of gasoline and ethanol
`
`("gasohol"),
`
`or straight
`
`ethanol. However,
`
`to date ethanol has not become economically
`
`competitive with gasoline,
`
`and consumers have not accepted
`
`30
`
`ethanol to any great degree. Moreover,
`
`to make an alternate fuel
`
`such as ethanol available to the extent necessary to achieve
`
`appreciable improvements
`
`in nationwide air quality and fuel
`
`1
`
`Page 3 of 102
`Page 3 of 102
`
`Page 3 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/l8844
`
`conservation would require immense costs for
`
`infrastructUre
`
`improvements; not only the entire nation's motor fuel production
`
`and delivery
`
`system,
`
`but
`
`also the vehicle manufacture,
`
`distribution, and repair system, would have to be extensively
`
`revised or substantially duplicated.
`
`One proposal for reducing pollution in cities is to limit
`
`the use of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines and
`
`instead employ electric vehicles
`
`powered
`
`by
`
`rechargeable
`
`batteries. To date, all such "straight electric" cars have had
`
`very limited range,
`
`typically no more than 150 miles, have
`
`insufficient power for acceleration and hill climbing except when
`
`the batteries are substantially fully charged,
`
`and require
`
`substantial time for battery recharging. Thus, while there are
`
`many circumstances
`
`in which.
`
`the limited.
`
`range and extended
`
`recharging time of the batteries would not be an inconvenience,
`
`such cars are not suitable for all the travel requirements of
`
`most individuals. Accordingly, an electric car would have to be
`
`an additional vehicle for most users, posing a substantial
`
`economic deterrent. Moreover, it will be appreciated that in the
`
`United States most electricity is generated in coal—fired power
`
`plants, so that using electric vehicles merely moves the source
`
`of
`
`the pollution, but does not eliminate it. Furthermore,
`
`comparing the respective net costs per mile of driving, electric
`
`vehicles are not competitive with ethanol—fueled vehicles, much
`
`less with conventional gasoline—fueled vehicles. See, generally,
`
`Simanaitis, "Electric Vehicles", Road & Track, May 1992, pp. 126-
`
`136; Reynolds,
`
`"AC Propulsion CRX", Road & Track, October 1992,
`
`pp. 126—129.
`
`Brooks et a1 U.S. patent 5,492,192 shows such an electric
`
`vehicle;
`
`the invention appears to be directed to incorporation
`
`of antilock braking and traction control
`
`technologies into an
`
`otherwise conventional electric vehicle.
`
`Much attention has also been paid over
`
`the years
`
`to
`
`development of electric vehicles including internal combustion
`
`engines powering generators,
`
`thus eliminating the defect of
`
`limited range exhibited by simple electric vehicles. The simplest
`
`such vehicles operate on the same general principle as diesel-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`2
`
`Page 4 of 102
`Page 4 of 102
`
`Page 4 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`electric locomotives used by most railroads.
`
`In such systems, an
`
`internal combustion engine drives a generator providing electric
`
`power to traction motors connected directly to the wheels of the
`
`vehicle.
`
`This system has the advantage that no variable gear
`
`ratio transmission is required between the engine and the wheels
`
`of the vehicle.
`
`More particularly, an internal combustion engine produces
`zero torque at zero engine speed (RPM) and reaches its torque
`
`peak somewhere in the middle of its operating range. Accordingly,
`
`10
`
`all vehicles driven directly by an internal combustion engine
`
`(other
`
`than certain single—speed vehicles using friction or
`
`centrifugal clutches, and not useful for normal driving) require
`
`a variable—ratio transmission between the engine and the wheels,
`
`so that the engine's torque can be matched to the road speeds and
`
`loads encountered. Further,
`
`some sort of clutch must be provided
`
`so that the engine can be mechanically decoupled from the wheels,
`
`allowing the vehicle to stop while the engine is still running,
`
`and to allow some slippage of the engine with respect
`
`to the
`
`drive train while starting from.
`
`a stop.
`
`It would not be
`
`practical to provide a diesel
`
`locomotive,
`
`for example, with a
`
`multiple speed transmission, or
`
`a clutch. Accordingly,
`
`the
`
`additional complexity of
`
`the generator and electric traction
`
`motors is accepted. Electric traction motors produce full torque
`
`at zero RPM and thus can be connected directly to the wheels;
`
`when it is desired that the train should accelerate,
`
`the diesel
`
`engine is simply throttled to increase the generator output and
`
`the train begins to move.
`
`The same drive system may be employed in a smaller vehicle
`
`such as
`
`an automobile or
`
`truck, but has
`
`several distinct
`
`disadvantages
`
`in this application.
`
`In particular,
`
`and
`
`as
`
`discussed in detail below in connection with Figs.
`
`1 and 2, it
`
`is well known that a gasoline or other internal combustion engine
`
`is most efficient when producing near its maximum output torque.
`
`Typically,
`
`the number of diesel
`
`locomotives on a
`
`train is
`
`selected in accordance with the total tonnage to be moved and the
`
`grades to be overcome,
`
`so that all
`
`the locomotives can be
`
`operated at nearly full
`
`torque production. Moreover,
`
`such
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`3
`
`Page 5 of 102
`Page 5 of 102
`
`Page 5 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`locomotives tend to be run at steady speeds for long periods of
`
`time. Reasonably efficient fuel use is thus achieved. However,
`
`such a direct drive vehicle would not achieve good
`
`fuel
`
`efficiency in typical automotive use,
`
`involving many short trips,
`
`frequent stops in traffic, extended low—speed operation and the
`
`like.
`
`So-called "series hybrid" electric vehicles have been
`proposed for automotive use, wherein batteries are used as energy
`storage devices, so that an internal combustion engine provided
`
`10
`
`to power a generator can be operated in its most fuel-efficient
`
`output power range while still allowing the electric traction
`
`motor(s) powering the vehicle to be operated as required. Thus
`
`the engine may be loaded by supplying torque to a generator
`
`charging the batteries while supplying electrical power to the
`
`15
`
`traction motor(s) as required, so as to operate efficiently. This
`
`20
`
`25
`
`system overcomes the limitations of electric vehicles noted above
`
`with respect to limited range and long recharge times. Thus, as
`
`compared
`
`to a
`
`conventional vehicle, wherein the
`
`internal
`
`combustion engine delivers torque directly to the wheels,
`
`in a
`
`series hybrid electric vehicle,
`
`torque is delivered from the
`
`engine to the wheels via a serially connected generator used as
`
`a battery charger,
`
`the battery, and the traction motor. Energy
`
`transfer between those components consumes at least approximately
`
`25% of engine power. Further, such components add substantially
`
`to the cost and weight of the vehicle;
`
`in particular, an electric
`
`motor capable of providing sufficient torque to meet all expected
`
`demand, e.g., to allow reasonable performance under acceleration,
`
`during hill-climbing and the like,
`
`is rather heavy and expensive.
`
`Thus,
`
`series
`
`hybrid vehicles
`
`have
`
`not
`
`been
`
`immediately
`
`3O
`
`successful.
`
`A more promising "parallel hybrid" approach is shown in
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 3,566,717 and 3,732,751 to Berman et al.
`
`In
`
`Berman et al an internal combustion engine and an electric motor
`
`are matched through a complex gear train so that both can provide
`
`35
`
`torque directly to the wheels,
`
`the vehicle being operated in
`
`several different modes. Where
`
`the output of
`
`the internal
`
`combustion engine is more than necessary to drive the vehicle
`
`4
`
`Page 6 of 102
`Page 6 of 102
`
`Page 6 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`("first mode operation") the engine is run at constant speed and
`excess power is converted by a first motor/generator ("Speeder")
`
`to electrical energy for storage in a battery.
`
`In "second mode
`
`operation",
`
`the internal combustion engine drives the wheels
`
`directly, and is throttled. When more power is needed than the
`
`engine
`
`can provide,
`
`a
`
`second motor/generator or
`
`"torquer"
`
`provides additional torque as needed.
`Berman
`et
`al
`thus
`show
`
`two
`
`separate
`
`electric
`
`motor/generators separately powered by the internal combustion
`
`10
`
`engine; the “Speeder"
`
`charges the batteries, while the "torquer"
`
`propels the vehicle forward in traffic. This arrangement is a
`
`source of additional complexity, cost and difficulty, as two
`
`separate modes of engine control are required. Moreover,
`
`the
`
`operator must control the transition between the several modes
`
`15
`
`of operation.
`
`Such.
`
`a complex vehicle is unsuited for
`
`the
`
`automotive market. Automobiles intended for mass production can
`
`be no more complicated to Operate than conventional vehicles, and
`
`must be essentially "foolproof",
`
`that is, resistant to damage
`
`that might be caused by operator error. Further,
`
`the gear train
`
`20
`
`shown by Berman et al appears to be quite complex and difficult
`
`to manufacture economically. Berman et al also indicate that one
`
`or even two variable-speed transmissions may be required; see,
`
`e.g., col. 3,
`
`lines 19 — 22 and 36 — 38 of patent 3,566,717, and
`
`col. 2,
`
`lines 53 — 55 of patent 3,732,751.
`
`Lynch et al patent 4,165,795 also shows an early parallel
`
`hybrid drive.
`
`Lynch argues that maximum fuel efficiency can be
`
`realized when a relatively small internal combustion engine is
`
`provided, such that when the engine is operated at an efficient
`
`speed, it produces approximately the average power required over
`
`a typical mission.
`
`The example given is of an engine producing
`
`25 hp maximum and 17 hp at its most efficient speed, about 2500
`
`rpm. This is to be combined with an electric motor—generator of
`
`about
`
`30 peak hp.
`
`This vehicle requires a variable—ratio
`
`transmission to achieve reasonable performance. It appears that
`
`the engine is to be run continuously, at a steady speed, with
`
`additional torque provided by the motor when needed and excess
`
`torque produced by the engine being used to charge the batteries.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`5
`
`Page 7 of 102
`Page 7 of 102
`
`Page 7 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`In a
`
`first
`
`embodiment,
`
`torque provided by
`
`the motor
`
`is
`
`transmitted to the drive wheels through the engine, while in a
`
`second embodiment their respective positions are reversed.
`
`Nishida U.S. patent 5,117,931 shows
`
`a parallel hybrid
`
`vehicle where torque from an electric motor may be combined with
`
`torque
`
`from an
`
`internal
`
`combustion
`
`engine
`
`in a
`
`"torque
`
`transmission unit" comprising paired bevel gears and means for
`
`controlling the relative rates of rotation of
`
`the motor and
`
`engine, so that the motor can be used to start the engine, absorb
`
`excess torque from the engine (by charging a battery), or provide
`
`additional propulsive torque.
`
`A variable—speed transmission is
`
`coupled between the torque transmission unit and the propelling
`
`wheels. Both the torque transmission unit and the variable—speed
`
`transmission are complex, heavy, and expensive components,
`
`the
`
`use of which would preferably be avoided.
`
`Helling
`
`U.S. patent 3,923,115 also shows
`
`an hybrid
`
`vehicle having a torque transmission unit for combining torque
`
`from an electric motor
`
`and an internal
`
`combustion engine.
`
`However,
`
`in Helling the relative rates of rotation of the motor
`
`and engine input shafts are fixed;
`
`a flywheel is provided to
`
`store excess mechanical energy as well as a battery to store
`
`excess electrical energy. Albright, Jr. et al patent 4,588,040
`
`shows another hybrid drive scheme using a flywheel
`
`in addition
`
`to batteries
`
`to store excess
`
`energy; various
`
`complicated
`
`mechanical
`
`connections
`
`are
`
`provided
`
`between
`
`the
`
`various
`
`components.
`
`Capacitors have also been proposed for energy
`
`storage; see Bates et al U.S. patent 5,318,142.
`
`Fjallstrom U.S. patent 5,120,282 shows a parallel hybrid
`
`drive train wherein torque from two electric motors is combined
`
`with torque produced by an internal combustion engine;
`
`the
`
`combination is performed by a complex arrangement of paired
`
`planetary gearsets, and unspecified control means are alleged to
`
`be able to allow variation of road speed without a variable—ratio
`
`transmission.
`
`Hunt U.S. Patent Nos. 4,405,029 and 4,470,476 also disclose
`
`parallel
`
`hybrids
`
`requiring
`
`complex
`
`gearing
`
`arrangements,
`
`including multiple speed transmissions. More specifically,
`
`the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`6
`
`Page 8 of 102
`Page 8 of 102
`
`Page 8 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/l 8844
`
`Hunt patents disclose several embodiments of parallel hybrid
`
`vehicles. Hunt indicates (see col. 4,
`
`lines 6 — 20 of the '476
`
`patent)
`
`that an electric motor may drive the vehicle at
`
`low
`
`speeds up to 20 mph, and an internal combustion engine used for
`
`speeds above 20 mph, while "in certain speed ranges, such as from
`
`15 — 30 mph, both power sources may be energized... Additionally,
`
`load
`heavy
`be utilized under
`could
`sources
`power
`both
`conditions." Hunt also indicates that "the vehicle couldabe
`
`provided with an automatic changeover device which automatically
`
`10
`
`shifts
`
`from the electrical
`
`power
`
`source
`
`to the
`
`internal
`
`combustion power source, depending on the speed of the vehicle"
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`(col. 4,
`
`lines 12 - 16).
`
`However,
`
`the Hunt vehicle does not meet the objects of the
`
`present invention, as discussed in detail below. Hunt's vehicle
`
`in each embodiment requires a conventional manual or automatic
`
`transmission. See col. 2,
`
`lines 6 — 7. Moreover,
`
`the internal
`
`combustion engine is connected to the transfer case (wherein
`
`torque from the internal combustion engine and electric motor is
`
`combined)
`
`by
`
`a
`
`"fluid coupling
`
`or
`
`torque
`
`converter
`
`of
`
`conventional construction". Col.
`
`2,
`
`lines
`
`16
`
`—
`
`17.
`
`Such
`
`transmissions and fluid couplings or torque converters are very
`
`inefficient,
`
`are heavy,
`
`bulky,
`
`and costly,
`
`and are to be
`
`eliminated according to one object of
`
`the present
`
`invention,
`
`again as discussed in detail below.
`
`Furthermore,
`
`the
`
`primary means
`
`of battery charging
`
`disclosed by Hunt
`
`involves a further undesirable complexity,
`
`namely a
`
`turbine driving the electric motor
`
`in generator
`
`configuration. The turbine is fueled by waste heat
`
`from the
`
`internal combustion engine. See col. 3,
`
`lines 10 — 60. Hunt's
`
`internal combustion engine is also fitted with an alternator, for
`
`additional battery charging capability,
`
`adding yet
`
`further
`
`complexity. Thus it is clear that Hunt fails to teach a hybrid
`
`vehicle meeting the objects of the present invention — that is,
`
`a hybrid vehicle competitive with conventional vehicles with
`
`respect
`
`to performance, cost and complexity, while achieving
`
`substantially improved fuel efficiency.
`
`Kawakatsu U.S. Patents Nos. 4,305,254 and 4,407,132 show a
`
`7
`
`Page 9 of 102
`Page 9 of 102
`
`Page 9 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`parallel hybrid involving a single internal combustion engine
`coupled to the drive wheels through a conventional variable—ratio
`
`transmission,
`
`an electric motor,
`
`and an alternator,
`
`to allow
`
`efficient use of the internal combustion engine. As in the Hunt
`
`disclosure,
`
`the engine is intended to be operated in a relatively
`
`efficient range of engine speeds; when it produces more torque
`
`than is needed to propel
`the vehicle,
`the excess is used to
`charge the batteries; where the engine provides insufficient
`
`torque,
`
`the motor is energized as well.
`
`A further Kawakatsu patent, No. 4,335,429,
`
`shows a hybrid
`
`vehicle,
`
`in this case comprising an internal combustion engine
`
`and two motor/generator units.
`
`A first larger motor/generator,
`
`powered by a battery,
`
`is used to provide additional torque when
`
`that provided by the engine is insufficient;
`
`the larger motor—
`
`generator also converts excess torque provided by the engine into
`
`electrical energy,
`
`to be stored by the battery, and is used in
`
`a regenerative braking mode.
`
`The second smaller motor/generator
`
`is similarly used to provide additional
`
`torque and additional
`
`regenerative braking as needed.
`
`More particularly,
`
`the latter Kawakatsu patent asserts that
`
`a single electric motor sized to provide sufficient torque to
`
`propel the vehicle would not be capable of providing sufficient
`
`regenerative braking force; see col. 1,
`
`line 50 — col.
`
`2 line 8.
`
`Accordingly, Kawakatsu provides two separate motor/generators,
`
`as noted; a separate engine starting motor is also provided.
`
`See
`
`col.
`
`6,
`
`lines 22 — 23.
`
`In the embodiment shown,
`
`the larger
`
`motor/generator is connected to the wheel drive shaft, while the
`
`engine and the smaller motor/generator are connected to the
`
`wheels through a complex mechanism comprising three separately—
`
`controllable clutches. See col. 5,
`
`lines 50 - 62.
`
`Numerous patents disclose hybrid vehicle drives tending to
`
`fall into one or more of the categories discussed above. A number
`
`of patents disclose systems wherein an operator is required to
`
`select between electric and internal combustion operation; for
`
`example,
`
`an electric motor
`
`is provided for operation inside
`
`buildings where exhaust fumes would be dangerous, and an internal
`
`combustion engine provided for operation outdoors.
`
`It is also
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`8
`
`Page 10 of 102
`Page 10 of 102
`
`Page 10 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`known to propose a hybrid vehicle comprising an electric motor
`
`for use at low speeds, and an internal combustion engine for use
`
`at higher speed.
`
`The art also suggests using both when maximum
`
`torque is required.
`
`In several cases the electric motor drives
`
`one set of wheels and the internal combustion engine drives a
`
`different set. See generally Shea
`
`(4,180,138); Fields et al
`
`(4,351,405); Kenyon (4,438,342); Krohling (4,593,779); and Ellers
`(4,923,025).
`“
`
`Many of these patents show hybrid vehicle drives wherein a
`
`10
`
`variable
`
`speed
`
`transmission is
`
`required,
`
`as
`
`do
`
`numerous
`
`additional references. A transmission as noted above is typically
`
`required where the internal combustion engine and/or the electric
`
`motor are not capable of supplying sufficient
`
`torque at
`
`low
`
`speeds.
`
`See Rosen
`
`(3,791,473);
`
`Rosen
`
`(4,269,280);
`
`Fiala
`
`(4,400,997); and Wu et al
`
`(4,697,660). Kinoshita (3,970,163)
`
`shows a vehicle of this general type wherein a gas turbine engine
`
`is coupled to the road wheels through a three-speed transmission;
`
`an electric motor is provided to supply additional torque at low
`
`speeds.
`
`For further examples of series hybrid vehicles generally
`
`as discussed above, see Bray (4,095,664); Cummings (4,148,192);
`
`Monaco et al (4,306,156); Park (4,313,080); McCarthy (4,354,144);
`
`Heidemeyer
`
`(4,533,011); Kawamura (4,951,769); and Suzuki et al
`
`(5,053,632). Various of these address specific problems arising
`
`in the manufacture or use of hybrid vehicles, or specific alleged
`
`design improvements.
`
`For
`
`example, Park addresses certain
`
`specifics of battery charging and discharge characteristics,
`
`while McCarthy shows a complex drive system involving an internal
`
`combustion engine driving two electric motors;
`
`the torque
`
`generated by the latter is combined in a complex differential
`
`providing continuously variable gear ratios. Heidemeyer shows
`
`connecting an internal combustion engine to an electric motor by
`
`a
`
`first
`
`friction clutch,
`
`and
`
`connecting the motor
`
`to a
`
`transmission by a second friction clutch.
`
`Other patents of general relevance to this subject matter
`
`include Toy (3,525,874),
`
`showing a series hybrid using a gas
`
`turbine as
`
`internal combustion engine; Yardney
`
`(3,650,345),
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`9
`
`Page 11 of 102
`Page 11 of 102
`
`Page 11 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`showing use of a compressed—air or similar mechanical starter for
`
`the internal combustion engine of a series hybrid,
`
`such that
`
`batteries of
`
`limited current capacity could. be used;
`
`and
`
`Nakamura
`
`(3,837,419),
`
`addressing improvements
`
`in thyristor
`
`battery—charging and motor drive circuitry.
`
`Somewhat further
`
`afield but of general
`
`interest are the disclosures of Deane
`
`(3,874,472); Horwinski
`(4,042,056); Yang
`(4,562,894); Keedy
`(4,611,466); and Lexen (4,815,334); Mori (3,623,568); Grady, 3r.
`
`(3,454,122); Papst
`
`(3,211,249); Nims et a1
`
`(2,666,492);
`
`and
`
`Matsukata (3,502,165). Additional references showing parallel
`
`hybrid vehicle drive systems include Froelich (1,824,014) and
`
`Reinbeck (3,888,325).U.S. Patent No. 4,578,955 to Medina shows
`
`a hybrid system. wherein a gas
`
`turbine is used to drive a
`
`generator as needed to charge batteries. Of particular interest
`
`to certain aspects of
`
`the present
`
`invention is that Medina
`
`discloses that the battery pack should have a voltage in the
`
`range of 144, 168 or 216 volts and the generator should deliver
`
`current in the range of 400 to 500 amperes. Those of skill in the
`
`art will recognize that these high currents involve substantial
`
`resistance heating losses,
`
`and additionally require that all
`
`electrical connections be made by positive mechanical means such
`
`as bolts and nuts, or by welding. More specifically, for reasons
`
`of safety and in accordance with industry practice, currents in
`
`excess of about 50 amperes cannot be carried by the conventional
`
`plug-in connectors preferred for
`
`reasons of convenience and
`
`economy, but must be carried by much heavier, more expensive and
`
`less convenient fixed connectors (as used on conventional starter
`
`and battery cable
`
`connections). Accordingly,
`
`it would
`
`be
`
`desirable to operate the electric motor of a hybrid vehicle at
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`lower currents.
`
`U.S. patent 5,765,656 to Weaver also shows a series hybrid
`
`wherein a gas turbine is used as the internal combustion engine;
`
`hydrogen is the preferred fuel.
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`4,439,989 to Yamakawa
`
`shows
`
`a
`
`system
`
`35
`
`wherein two different internal combustion engines are provided,
`
`so that only one need be
`
`run when the load is low. This
`
`arrangement would be complex and expensive to manufacture.
`
`10
`
`Page 12 of 102
`Page 12 of 102
`
`Page 12 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`Detailed discussion of various aspects of hybrid vehicle
`
`drives may be found in Kalberlah, "Electric Hybrid Drive Systems
`
`for Passenger Cars and Taxis",
`
`SAE Paper No. 910247
`
`(1991).
`
`Kalberlah first compares "straight" electric, series hybrid, and
`
`parallel hybrid drive trains, and concludes that parallel hybrids
`
`are preferable, at least when intended for general use (that is,
`
`straight electric vehicles may be useful under certain narrow
`
`conditions of low—speed,
`
`limited range urban driving). Kalberlah
`
`then compares various forms of parallel hybrids, with respect to
`
`10
`
`his Fig. 4, and concludes that the most practical arrangement is
`
`one in which an internal combustion engine drives a first pair
`
`of wheels, and an electric motor the second; more particularly,
`
`Kalberlah indicates that mechanical combination of the torque
`
`from an internal combustion engine and an electric motor
`
`is
`
`15
`
`impractical.
`
`Gardner U.S.
`
`patents
`
`5,301,764
`
`and
`
`5,346,031
`
`follow
`
`Kalberlah's teachings,
`
`in that Gardner shows separately driving
`
`at
`
`least two pairs of wheels; one pair is driven by a first
`
`electric motor, and the second by a second electric motor or
`
`alternatively by a small
`
`internal combustion engine.
`
`Three
`
`different clutches are provided to allow various sources of drive
`
`torque to be connected.
`
`to the wheels,
`
`and to a generator,
`
`depending on
`
`the vehicle's operation mode.
`
`The
`
`internal
`
`combustion engine is run continuously, and provides the driving
`
`torque when the vehicle is in a cruise mode; at other times it
`
`is used to charge the batteries powering the electric motors.
`
`Bullock,
`
`"The Technological Constraints of Mass, Volume,
`
`Dynamic Power Range and Energy Capacity on the Viability of
`
`Hybrid and Electric Vehicles",
`
`SAE Paper No.
`
`891659
`
`(1989)
`
`provides a detailed theoretical analysis of electric vehicles in
`
`terms of the loads thereon, and a careful analysis of the various
`
`battery types then available. Bullock concludes that a vehicle
`
`having two electric motors of differing characteristics, driving
`
`the wheels
`
`through.
`
`a variable-speed transmission, would be
`
`optimal
`
`for automotive use;
`
`see the discussion of Fig.
`
`8.
`
`Bullock also suggests the use of an internal combustion engine
`
`to drive battery charging, but does not address combining the
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`11
`
`Page 13 of 102
`Page 13 of 102
`
`Page 13 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`WO 00/15455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`engine's torque with that from the motors; see pp. 24 — 25.’
`
`Further related papers are collected in Electric and Hybrid
`
`yghigle_1gghnglggy, volume SP-915, published by SAE in February
`
`1992.
`
`See also Wouk, "Hybrids: Then and Now"; Bates,
`
`"On the
`
`road with a Ford HEV", and King et al, "Transit Bus takes the
`
`Hybrid Route", all in lgfi;_§pggtrum, Vol. 32, 7,
`
`(July 1995).
`
`Urban et al U.S. patent 5,667,029 shows two embodiments of
`
`parallel hybrids; a first embodiment is shown in Figs.
`
`1 — 9 and
`
`11,
`
`and a:
`
`second in Figs.
`
`12
`
`- 17.
`
`Both embodiments have
`
`numerous
`
`common features,
`
`including similar operating modes.
`
`Referring to the first embodiment, an internal combustion engine
`
`provides torque to the road. wheels or
`
`to a generator;
`
`two
`
`electric motors can provide torque to the road wheels, or charge
`
`batteries during regenerative braking.
`
`Torque from the engine
`
`and motors is combined at the input shaft to a variable-ratio
`
`transmission. Overrunning clutches are provided, e.g.,
`
`to allow
`
`the engine's torque to be applied to the road wheels without also
`
`rotating the motors.
`
`As indicated at col. 6,
`
`lines 25 - 54, certain transitions
`
`between
`
`various
`
`operating modes
`
`are made
`
`automatically,
`
`responsive to the position of the accelerator pedal; for example,
`
`if the operator does not depress the pedal beyond a given point,
`
`only the internal combustion engine is employed to propel
`
`the
`
`vehicle;
`
`if the operator depresses the pedal more fully,
`
`the
`
`electric motors are also energized.
`
`Other changes
`
`in the
`
`operational mode must be made by the operator directly;
`
`for
`
`example,
`
`the vehicle may be operated as a "straight electric"
`
`vehicle, e.g. for short duration trips, by the operator's making
`
`an appropriate control action.
`
`See col. 7,
`
`lines 49 — 56.
`
`The Urban et a1 design appears to suffer from a number of
`
`significant defects. First,
`
`the internal combustion engine is
`
`stated to provide all torque needed to accelerate the vehicle to
`
`cruising speed under normal circumstances (see col. 5,
`
`lines 3 -
`
`10), and also to propel the vehicle during cruising (see col. 6,
`
`lines 48 - 54).
`
`The electric motors are to be used only during
`
`rapid acceleration and hill—climbing; col. 5,
`
`lines 10 — 13. A
`
`20 horsepower engine, operated through a continuously variable-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`12
`
`Page 14 of 102
`Page 14 of 102
`
`Page 14 of 102
`
`FMC 1004
`FMC 1004
`
`

`

`W0 00/ I 5455
`
`PCT/US99/18844
`
`ratio transmission and a
`
`torque converter,
`
`is stated to be
`
`adequate for this purpose.
`
`Such components are clearly complex
`
`and
`
`expensive;
`
`further,
`
`torque
`
`converters
`
`are notoriously
`
`inefficient. Moreover, using the internal combustion engine as
`
`the sole source of power for low—speed running would require it
`
`to be run at low speeds, e.g., at traffic lights, which is very
`
`inefficient and highly polluting.
`
`(Various additional references
`
`suggest that excess torque can be used to charge batteries;~if
`
`this were incorporated in the Urban system,
`
`the engine might be
`
`10
`
`run at a reasonably efficient output level while the vehicle was
`
`stationary, but this would lead to high levels of noise and
`
`vibration.
`
`In any event Urban

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket