throbber
From: Booth, Daniel [mailto:daniel.booth@weil.com]
`Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 2:48 PM
`To: Luke McLeroy
`Cc: Antonelli, Matthew; Ehrlich, Paul
`Subject: VirnetX v. Microsoft
`
`Luke,
`Thank you for speaking with me this afternoon regarding the suit that VirnetX filed last week.
`We agree to accept service of the complaint on behalf of Microsoft. Additionally, you have
` agreed to a 30-day extension in the deadline for Microsoft's answer and/or preanswer motions
` (51 total days). We will file the appropriate papers for the extension.
`You also requested that we discuss VirnetX's potential request for an expedited discovery
` schedule. We suggest a call on the afternoon of Monday, March 29 to discuss any proposals
` you may have. It would be helpful to know some details or specific proposals, including any
` asserted need for expedited discovery, so that we can assess them prior to the call.
`Regards,
`_____________________________________________________
`Daniel Booth | Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Associate
`700 Louisiana, Suite 1600 | Houston, Texas 77002
`(713) 546-5135 | (713) 224-9511 (fax) | daniel.booth@weil.com
`
`The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
` above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible
` to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
` copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
` please immediately notify us by email (postmaster@weil.com), and destroy the original message. Thank
` you.
`
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2004
`Microsoft v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2014-00558

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket