`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`Joseph E. Palys
`
`Naveen Modi
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
` Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Telephone: 571-203-2700
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`E-mail: joseph.palys@finnegan.com
`
` naveen.modi@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`Filed: April 21, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Microsoft Corporation
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VirnetX Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135 (“the ’135 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`A.
`The ’135 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is or was at issue in
`
`the following inter partes review and inter partes reexamination proceedings:
`
`Case IPR2013-003481
`
`Case IPR2013-003492
`
`Case IPR2013-003753
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`2 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`3 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00171
`
`Case IPR2014-00172
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’135
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`Case IPR2013-003544
`
`Case IPR2013-003765
`
`Case IPR2014-00173
`
`Case IPR2014-00610
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`
`4 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`5 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`Case IPR2013-003776
`
`Case IPR2013-003937
`
`Case IPR2013-003948
`
`Case IPR2014-00176
`
`Case IPR2014-00177
`
`Case IPR2014-00612
`
`Case IPR2014-00613
`
`Case IPR2014-00614
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
` The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013, and
`
` 7
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`8 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`4
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`Case IPR2013-003789
`
`Case IPR2013-0039710
`
`Case IPR2013-0039811
`
`Case IPR2014-00174
`
`Case IPR2014-00175
`
`Case IPR2014-00615
`
`Case IPR2014-00616
`
`Case IPR2014-00618
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180
`
`Case IPR2014-00401
`
`Case IPR2014-00405
`
`
`9 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`10 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`11 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00481
`
`Case IPR2014-00482
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`Case IPR2014-00403
`
`Case IPR2014-00404
`
`Case IPR2014-00483
`
`Case IPR2014-00484
`
`Case IPR2014-00485
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Case IPR2014-00486
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`
`Case IPR2014-00238
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`to the ’135 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`11/839,937
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/285,962
`
`13/475,637
`
`
`
`13/615,536
`
`13/615,557
`
`13/617,375
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`13/911,792
`
`13/911,813
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/950,919
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/950,897
`
`--
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’135 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`that led to the ’135 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)12
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6:12-cv-00855)
`
`
`12 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The only remaining defendants in this case
`
`are Apple and Cisco. The district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX
`
`against Apple, and Apple has appealed that judgment to the Federal Circuit. In the
`
`Cisco portion of the case, the district court recently ruled on post-trial issues.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:13—cv—00211 (ED. Tex.)13
`
`Microsoft Co;p., N0. 6: l3-cv—00351 (ED. Tex.)
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`
`In accordance with 37 CPR. §42_8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg. No. 46,224)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`
`11955 Freedom Drive
`
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`
`E-mail: naveen.modi@fmnegan.com
`
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`
`Phone: (571) 203-2700
`
`Telephone: 202-408—4065
`
`Fax: (202) 408-4400
`
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`
`E-mail: joseph.palys@fmnegan.com
`
`13 The district court recently ordered Apple to pay VirnetX a royalty on
`
`certain products. Apple has appealed that decision.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 21, 2014
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Case IPR2014-00558
`Patent 6,502,135
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by electronic means on April 21,
`
`2014 at the following address of record:
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-783-5070
`F: 202-783-2331
`
`Kevin E. Greene, Reg. No. 46,031
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-626-6376
`F: 202-783-2331
`
`IPR38868-0004IP1@fr.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`Dated: April 21, 2014
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
