throbber
f§3§3fl
`
`HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY
`
`Title
`
`Compositional Changes in Molecular Species of Fish Muscle
`Phosphatidylcholine during Frozen Storage
`
`TAKAHASHI, Koretaro ; ZAMA, KO ichi
`Author(s)
`
`
`cnamn
`
`
`flmfiWmummm%im_mnwnNmrnr
`FACULTYOFFBHERESHOKKAHX)UNnmRsnY
`37(1): 8034
`
`Issue Date
`
`1986-02
`
`http://hdl.handle.net/Zl15/23908
`Doc URL
`—‘T“—
`_
`__
`____-,_. W,-,
`,
`
`_..v~-r__
`
`.7.." W ,VW .,,,,,,,,,7,
`
`W,
`
`.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Right
`
`Type
`
`bulletin
`
`Additional
`Information
`
`
`fl
`
`Instructions for use
`
`Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP
`
`000001
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Of U.S. Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`
`ENZYMOTEC - 1022
`
`000001
`
`

`

`Bull. Fae. Fish. Hokkaido Univ.
`37(1), 80-84. 1986.
`
`Compositional Changes in Molecular Species of Fish Muscle
`
`Phosphatidylcholine during Frozen Storage
`
`Koretaro TAKAHASHI and Koichi ZAMA“
`
`Abstract
`
`Compositional changes in phosphatidylcholine molecular species of mackerel and Alaska
`pollack muscle during frozen storage were studied.
`During storage, the molecular species of (20:5) (20: 5), (20 : 5) (22 : 6) and (22: 6) (22:
`6) drastically decreased in Alaska pollack, in contrast to mackerel which exhibited a relative
`increase in the amount of the same molecular species.
`
`Organoleptic and chemical changes observed in taste, flavors and other prop—
`erties of fish during frozen storage are of great commercial importance. Changes in
`lipids often make frozen fish less acceptable. Though there is no doubt that the
`development of oxidative rancidity is one of the main problems with fatty fish that
`are rich in neutral lipids,“ changes in phospholipids also effect the quality of fish
`especially when it has been stored, under low temperaturel'” conditions. The
`susceptibility of attack from hydrolytic enzymes or oxygen is considered to be
`effected not only by the fatty acid composition, but also by the molecular species of
`the phospholipids?’ Therefore, the compositional changes of molecular species of a
`representative phospholipid, phosphatidylcholine (PC), were examined.
`
`Materials
`
`Experimental
`
`Fish used for this research were mackerel (Scomber japonicus) caught off the
`coast of Hachinohe, Japan, in May 1984 and Alaska pollack (Theraga chalcogramma)
`from Uchiura Bay, Hokkaido, Japan in Dec. 1981.
`The mean body weight of five mackerel examined was 446 g and that of Alaska
`pollack was 610 g.
`
`MeLdes
`
`The dorsal muscle of mackerel was collected and separated into dark muscle
`(DM) and White muscle (WM). Dorsal muscle of Alaska pollack was also collected
`but it was not separated into DM and WM since the amount of DM was negligible.
`Muscles from both fish were chopped into small pieces with a kitchen knife and were
`packed in polyethylene bags. These bags were stored in a freezer at ~20°C for 6
`months and 9 months. Total lipid was extracted from the sample according to the
`method of Bligh-Dyer. Lipid composition was determined by the densitometric
`
`
`
`" Laboratory of Food Chemistry 1, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University ( thfgfik"? ggflg-cftffigft
`fit (Kim @3145)
`
`80 7*
`
`000002
`
`000002
`
`

`

`TAKAHASIII & ZAMAZ Changes in phospholipid during storage
`
`method (Ozumor Densitometer model 82, Tokyo) after charring the thin layer
`chromatographic plate at
`l50—160°C. The spray reagent used for thin layer
`chromatography was 3% copper acetate in 80/0 phosphoric acid.“ The developing
`solvents used for thin layer chromatography Were n-hexane/ethyl ether/acetic acid
`(80 : 20 : 0.5, V/v) for nonpolar lipids and chloroform/methanel/acetic acid/water
`(25 : l5 : 4 : 2, v/V) for polar lipids. Purification and identification of PC molecular
`species were done in the same manner as previously reported.”
`All the molecular species analyzed were calculated as mg/ 100 g muscle for the
`principal component analysis (PCA).“
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Lipid compositional changes in frozen fish stored at »-—20°C is shown in Fig. l.
`The amount of free fatty acid (FFA) increased both in mackerel and Alaska pollack
`during the 6 months storage while all other lipid components decreased. After 9
`months storage, all
`the lipid components,
`including FFA, decreased though the
`relative amount of FFA increased in mackerel DM. The drastic decrease in total
`
`lipids is considered to be mostly caused by the decrease in triglyceride in the case of
`mackerel and PC was considered to be responsible in the case of Alaska pollack.
`From an idealistic viewpoint, changes in molecular species of all the lipid
`classes should be studied, but unfortunately, the methodology and theory in deter—
`mining the molecular species composition of marine sources has been established
`only for PC and phosphatidylethanolamine.3) Compositional change of the PC
`molecular species during frozen storage was investigated and the result is shown in
`Fig. 2 as high performance liquid chromatograms (lll’LC). Outstanding differences
`in the chromatographic patterns were observed between mackerel and Alaska
`
`Dark muscle
`
`Mackerel
`
`White muscle
`
`
`
`Scales are In Hold 9/1009 muscle
`
`Alaska Dollack
`
`
`
`Triglyceride % Free fatty acid
`
` Sterol
`
`E Phosphatidylcnol 1 ne
`
`
`
` ' i=1 Phosphatidylethcnolamine + Phasnhatldylserlne
`
`[W others
`
`
`
`5 months
`
`
`9 months
`
`Fig. l. Lipid compositional change in fish flesh during frozen storage at ~20°(l.
`m 81 W.
`
`000003
`
`000003
`
`

`

`Bull. Fae. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 37(1), 1986.
`
`1
`
`II
`
`III
`
`IV
`
`,
`
`2
`13
`m J MUN
`
`(
`
`"
`
`20
`
`
`
`
`\~‘\.M
`
`Alaska Dollack
`(0 month)
`
`JIK
`
`“Emir:
`
`so " To”
`
`l
`
`( Mackerel DM
`(0 month)
`1'
`I “(led Meow”
`l
`M
`
`
` J W “I“ ”i/“’“““
`
`Mackerel DM
`
`(6 months)
`
`l
`
`"
`
`"
`
`Mackerel DM
`
`l
`(9 months)
`(ll
`A
`l\VVVVV..
`‘ M W: ,
`‘1- W ,V
`,
`'
`I "J
`
`l
`
`Mackerel WM
`(0 month)
`
`‘
`
`Mackerel NM
`
`
`
`l
`
`(
`
`‘
`
`(l
`l
`)
`\"m’Kewu,
`l Jw”,
`i
`(6 months)
`( (”fillAnt/“A”
`'
`,
`mackerel NM
`l
`(9 months)
`‘
`1
`)
`‘
`,
`‘
`l
`l,
`11.6%) UUVK Hf/Ar’
`(i
`_‘ _,, 1""
`
`ll)1.
`1 Alaska pollack
`ll
`(6 months)
`k Al
`l
`,l «\J
`\~»M~.,_, W ,,J\_
`l
`L0
`l
`20
`so
`so
`warm
`ml Alaska Dollack
`(1
`l
`1 View-enjmmf L ”eighfloflthiw\w
`1.0
`m
`so
`30
`100mm
`
`Fig. 2. Changes in III’LC chromatographic patterns of fish muscle I’C molecular species during
`fronzen storge at 20°C.
`1 : (20: 5) (20:
`I : Groups composed of highly unsaturated fatty acids, that is,
`5), 2: (20:5) (22:6), 3: (22:6) (22:6) and 4: (20:11) (22:6).
`III: Groups composed of highly unsaturated fatty acids in combination with
`generally found fatty acids, that is, 5: (18 : 1) (20 : 5),
`6:
`(18 : 1) (22 : 6),
`7: (20:5),(1610), 8: (16:0) (20:5), 9: (22:6) (10:0) and
`10: (16:0)
`(22:6).
`II&IV: Others.
`
`11: (18:1) (16:0) and
`
`12: (10:0) (18:1).
`
`pollack. The molecular species that belongs to group .I. i.e. (20 : 5) (20:5), (20: 5)
`(22:6) and (22:6) (22:6), drastically dercascd in Alaska pollack during storage
`contrasting with mackerel which exhibited a relative increase in the amount of
`molecular species that belongs to group I. Molecular species of group IV relatively
`increased in both fish though the composition of molecular species in group IV is
`quite different for both fish. (16 : O) (18 : 1) was the representative molecular species
`of group IV in Alaska pollack while (16:0) (22 : 5), (16:0) (20: 4), (17: 1) (22:6),
`(18:0) (20 : 5) and (1.8 : 0) (22 : 6) were the representatives of group IV in mackerel.
`Results of PCA of the compositional change in PC molecular species are
`illustrated in figures 3 and 4. Contribution of this PCA was 85% up to the second
`principal component. (16 : 0) (22 : 6) was observed to be the molecular species closest
`to the first principal component as shown in these figures. Eigenvectors of (16:0)
`(18: l) and (22 : 6) (22 : 6) appeared to have a large angle against the axis of the first
`principal component in both figures when compared with other molecular species.
`This suggests that the decrease in the amounts of (16 : 0) (18 :
`'1) and (22 : 6) (22 : 6)
`are small compared to other molecular species.
`It has been pointed out that 22 : 6
`is the fatty acid most susceptible to oxidation”) But the results obtained in this
`study show that the efi'ect of (22 : 6) (22 : 6) on the decrease in the amount of PC is
`smaller than that of (16 : 0) (22 : 6), especially in mackerel, even though these
`molecular species are composed of the same component, 1.0. 22 : 6.
`()hshima et a1.
`had carefully removed the surface portion of the frozen stored sample before the
`lipid extraction in order to concentrate their discussion an enzymatic hydrolysis of
`
`000004
`
`000004
`
`

`

`TAKAHASHI 8L ZAMA: Changes in phospholipid during storage
`
`II
`
`II
`
`/(zo:5)(zo:5)
`'(l6:0) (20:5)
`/
`//
`
`4“,,»(205) (22:6)
`
`u..
`
`.
`
`,_n, ”‘I
`
`\(ls:1)(22:6)
`\
`\(22:6) (22:6)
`(l6:0)(18:1)
`
`
`
`hr.. ,. \(wnnzofl)
`
`
`J
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. Plots of principal loadings of the frozen samples and eigenvcctors of the PC molecular
`species displayed on the first and second principal component plane on I’CA.
`——————— Mackerel DM, — - - - - - Mackerel WM,
`Alaska pollack.
`I: First principal component, [1: Second principal component.
`1: Mackerel DM (0 month), 2: Mackerel DM (6 months), 3: Mackerel DM (9 months),
`4 : Mackerel WM (0 month), 5: Mackerel WM (6 months), 6 : Mackerel WM (9 months),
`7 : Alaska pollack (0 month), 8: Alaska pollack (6 months), 9: Alaska pollack (9
`months).
`
`III
`I
`
`III
`
`(16:0)(18:1)
`
`
`
`(16:0)(20:5)
`20:5 (20:5)
`’4 ,.e~)«-(18:1)(22:6)
`7R;_ i711 mums)
`““““:: “‘(16:0)(22:6)
`
`\\\
`l \ “‘~(zo:5)(22:6)
`l
`
`\(22:6)(22:6)
`
`
`
`Fig. 4. Plots of principal loadings of the frozen samples and eigcnvectnrs ol' the PC molecular
`species displayed on the first and third principal component plane on I’CA.
`I: First principal component, III: Third principal component.
`Symbols and numbers are the same as in Fig. 3.
`
`In their discussion it was demonstrated that, both in skipjack and
`phospholipidjfil
`cod muscle, the relative percentage of (22 : 6) (22 : 6) increased. This coincides with
`the HPLC chromatograms of mackerel shown in Fig. 2 which illustrate the relative
`increase in the amount of (22 : 6) (22 : 6) and differ from that of Alaska pollack.
`.In
`_g3_
`
`000005
`
`000005
`
`

`

`Bull. Fae. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 37(1), 1986.
`
`our study, the surface portion of the frozen stored sample was not removed before
`Therefore, some oxidative efi'ect might have contributed to a
`lipid extraction.
`Compositional changes in PC
`decrease in some kinds of PC molecular species.
`molecular species is considered to be the result of a complex reaction, namely
`hydrolysis in combination with oxidation.
`The next step in this study will be to clarify the extent of the oxidative effect
`as well as the hydrolytic efl'ect on PC molecular species degradation by discerning
`both reactions.
`
`References
`
`(In
`
`Takama, K, Zama, K. and Igarashi, II. (1972). Changes in the flesh lipids of fish during frozen
`storage. Part II. Flesh lipids of several species of fish. Bull. Fae. Fish. Hokkaido Unto,
`22, 290300.
`(In Japanese with English abstract).
`'I‘oyomizu, M. (1974). Sultana no Hinshitsu. 12371137 pp. Koseisha Koseikaku, Tokyo.
`Japanese).
`Takahashi, K. (1985). Suisan Do'butsu no Kinm'ka Shtshitsu. 24-37 pp. Koseisha Koseikaku,
`’I‘okyo.
`(In Japanese).
`chster, M.E,, Burns, B.J. and Mead, J.F. (1969). Quantitative densitometric TLC of lipids
`using copper acetate reagent.
`J. Chromatogr., 43, 120-«126.
`Takahashi, K, Hirano, T., Takama, K. and Zama, K. (1982). Molecular species of fish muscle
`lecithin. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish, 48, 1803—1814.
`Watari, M. and Kishi, M. (1982). Personal computer library 3, 9 19 12 pp. Kogaku Tosho,
`Tokyo.
`(In Japanese).
`Ohshima, T., Wada, S. and Koizumi, C. (1983). Enzymatic hydrolysis of phospholipids in cod
`flesh during cold storage. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish, 49, 1391-1404.
`(In Japanese with
`English abstract).
`Ohshima, ’1‘., Wada, S. and Koizumi, C. (1984). Enzymatic hydrolysis of phospholipids in cod
`flesh during storage in ice.
`Ibid., 50, 107—114.
`(In Japanese with English abstract).
`
`__ 34 _.
`
`000006
`
`000006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket