throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`TM 11de cumpoaition arm pineal organ fmun the ram
`
`how trout {flmrhy mamas) was date mined to snap-
`ubliah whathmr the inwhmment of ”13% man in the:
`control and“ mimadhn rhythm» ink mmm‘ by “initial:
`Mutauuns 0! “grid uampwiflon. Lipid mmprhud {3%
`
`at 111m W WM weight mmi mimymlywmh W m»
`
`
`
`Mar lipid! class
`regent HWK: af total lipid). Phnm
`
`phfltidylchai‘ina (PC) was thin principal pulls: livid. Ind
`smaller mparfians of ether phonphmipids and choluw
`tam! wuss also mus-em. Phxnmlmm mtrihulad “1%
`
`at" me Mmlmufina ngmgthMyhfilipidfl (EGPJ. Na
`mam we"! mm “mm [any mm Minna—swan
`
`of tfincylgiammlq we“ manually ahnflar to that of mm}.
`
`lipids in which natmnwd, monounsaturated and
`polyunsaturated fatty acids {PENN Ware gamut in M-
`mosf. equal pampmflm Em}: of the: palm:- lipid chasm
`had a mama: fatty fluid maflfim. With firm umpfinm
`M phwphamflyfimwiw {91}. m whim man-m mmpfisui
`23.4% «if ma WM fatty amid» amen-a van that [imam
`PWA in 931 lipid chum. The mmrfiun at mm-a
`newn- fiancee-ind 6.0% of She: {may uldn in my Hpid dun
`
`The predominant man-1mm special a! PC were
`lemmas; and “£1821, which accountant Mr 3&2 and
`
`“28.65%. mmmflwly. at the m HAM/aw!” WW cf this
`
`phmphonpmw PMmhmMyhfihm «lemma WE) mu»
`mined. than highmt law! a! «Emma-a {13%} «(my 9110*
`phoflpld.‘Tham was also *‘M «231' this mm M“
`in phasphafidyluflna {PS} and 4.1% in m. In PB, the»
`species 1.653122%, lflflflflfl and [8.1% mulled 45.1%,
`while In PS 1&W22:6 amalgamated I'm 48.9% of “In mm
`molwulm mwiw. Tim must abundant: malecuhr
`sped“ aim was lfiWfiuafl (TWML 111.2: mm mmmim
`trim: a! flaw minim! mm a!“ Mat, and pmimmly than
`
`
`molecular apmias campoamcm M P1, in mm similar to
`
`the compmifiun of
`a retina than that aftha brain.
`
`
`
`phi! 28, 331.317 (1994!.
`
`
`
`In fiah, an in all vartabmwfi, the retina cf the new and
`
`the pineal {1:31am of the brain are esscnfiai mmpunenm
`0f the cirtadian system that: measures the period and
`phase «91' tha daily lame-dark cycle and ultimately mn-
`tmla rhythmic pmwm (1.2),. In keen‘mg: with this role.
`ch» pm: mam affifih mam-aim phatomapmr cells that:
`display 421m Manhunflmfl naming!“ with the phom
`w—r-n—
`
`V'b whom mwesmndenm shwid be addressed.
`Abbrefiafiana; EGP. ethmnlmmm filymmphmvhafipiedu; HTLJC,
`high~wfumw Maui/ti chmmMgrw 3r: mm. highpmfim
`maxim thimhyu mmmamgmphy; 9C, pheaphnfifiyhhulim; FE.
`yhmphmfidylwmmumma; PG. phmphaudylgiym; FT. phuw
`phniidylinmima Pa phmphutitiyluflm; mm, wimmamd
`
`Emmy with; 5M. uphingomyolin; HG. t. "Mgiymmh. Mulmlar
`apam’n an abbreviated as mum-133mg“ 16:11’22H5PG m lwpnkniloyL
`2~¢mahamnwl~m~glywniauphmphmhofim.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wptors of the mung {3,4}. The phomrmpmr sells firom
`bath tissues: translate the lightt—dark infomation into a
`
`neural nutput mf mammary neumtramm'ttar 4(5) and a
`neumhonnmai mutput in film fawn m" mermm (3; In
`amnion m [maxim mtdtjmmnw mus, {Am iahmommw
`
`tar cells Mme pinaal organ an aim muMaflectam and
`
`
`can Lranaduce informatixmn supplied by athar eta
`a!
`
`
`
`{much as temp-amt“) m is mum] {catechnltwaminem
`adenosine, atamida} factors. Whereas retina! melam niu
`mm pmfamnfiafly in an aumnalpmafim mumm
`the Mammy; mmde by the pinata} mmribuim 15mm"
`m the circulating lwela and may be involved in the con——
`firm! of seamnai events, parfitulnflx reproduction, in war-
`mbratea {3,6—8)‘.
`The emu-tum} phnaphnlipids at‘ the retina and! brain
`M yartebr‘ama‘ including mm, am lmmm m mmmin high
`lambs of the wlmgatumwfl fatty acid MFA} $23114}
`£19.13} Withn the retina, the fififimfi in apparently com
`
`
`
`mnmted in the me brancus mm:- segments 0f the pha-
`
`twreoe-ptur mfi calls (11}, and these cells iaaia‘ted from
`fmg retina exhibit a selacfive uptake of 22:6nn3 in MIN
`(12). A rmtfizmam fur 22fiw3 in the visual 9W3 has
`
`Mean damomtmmd in Mudiw mm 11¢me wfimama
`and preterm human infanu. whim have 311mm that fihe
`visual acuity i3 aflmtcd by deprivation 01'22 :Sn-fl during
`pmcnaml deveiapment affine infant (13). Pemidafion 01'
`22:6m3 is one $47 the primary events ubaeweé in inher-
`fiwd or haumnfimlly indumd fihoturmapmr daganmw
`him (9.1%
`Di~22£n-3 phmpmlipifla m knowu to m: major coma
`mutants of rod cuter segment membramu in frag and rat
`
`{15,16}. Hanan: analyses of the» phosphnfipifia of the
`brain and retina (of trout and and have shown that di-
`2fizfin-3 mniawhr annuities am madm- mmtuenha of
`phmphmidylcvhmme (PC), phwphatidylmhmammim
`WE} and phwyhmidylwrim {MB} in Lhasa tiwum and
`that thin ia particularly tnm of the retina, when: the
`amounts am nunsiderably higher than thaw Found in
`
`terreatrial mammals (11,13). We importance uf 22:6n-3
`in («he vimml pmcaa of fiat: 115 also intimated by the at»
`”Nation that m pmpartim at“ di~2226nva in films phmaw
`phafipfid of mm dweloping gym «1' herring inflate in-
`
`
`uam with m‘ a: the rods in mind mm the phanto—
`mepmr popuiafian (19). The faults of them; nuaritianal
`atudias and tha presence wf iame amouma of {ii-22:6
`phogpholipid in We 12%mepr at“ the retina WWW;
`MK 2225an has an nmdal and “:qu miss in film: pri~
`mm event» amwinmd with m abaommun and trima-
`«fixation of phnhmn, This mm In of cruciai important»
`{w the phnmpefladic mnuml 6f the productim af mes—
`sages, such an melatonin,
`
`Frqwgm (613} BSZwsBZ-i?
`
`Grain r S! 05085 31839041343 5 3
`
`Tue Hm 16 14:05:01 2mm
`
`NOV 1E:
`
`Page 2 uf 8
`“3&1 @WWM
`
`
`
`
` . ARTICLEgmww
`Lipid Ccmposifim 0f the Pineal Organ from Rainbow Trout
`(Onwmynchw mykiiss)
`
`311
`
`m. Hendamm“. my. new, m: mam Sarge-m" and J. Falcon”
`
`MERE. umw Aquatic BMaMw Damnmm a! EH99“! and Muimww Saunas, may at Surfing. 3mm F149 M. 8mm, United
`Kingdom and Wait» do Mwmhbbgie at ads mmmmm Wm, UM {WEE 290. Famine dung Samoan. 3:50:22 Mien
`German Franm
`
`L
`.9
`
`WIQM @ mm by ADCS m
`
`000001
`
`“Whig a mu “WW? 4..me
`
`
`
`mung. was, :29, m. 2; {m4}
`
`AKER877ITC00070477
`
`000001
`
`

`

`
`
`[Eran (5133 952-3247
`
`Order # 050853100904184553
`
`Tue Nov 15 14:05:01 2004
`
`Page 3 of 8
`NW 16 '84 23:22PM
`
`312
`
`
`‘RJ. HENDERSON ETAL.
`
`,i
`i'i
`‘3
`
`gi
`
`.3
`
`i j
`
`
`development in the soccnd dimension. Developed chro-
`matograms were visualized with copper acetate in phos-
`phoric acid (23). Lipid class composition was quanti-
`tatad by double-development. HP‘TLC coupled with scan-
`
`ning donaitomctry, as described elsewhere (24).
`
`
`
`
`
`Ea rates of the relative amounts of the plasmaiogen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ard the diacyl for
`a of elhaoolamine glycorophospho»
`
`
`lipids (EGP) were obtained by acid hydrolysis of Lhoiso-
`
`
`lated EGPin still: on an
`plate followed by ch no-
`matcgraphy and quantitative phosphate staining as de-
`
`scribed by Bell and Dick (25).
`For the analysis of fatty acid composition, individual
`
`lipid classes were separated by two-dimensional TLC on
`20 x 20 cm glass plates coated with silica gel G 60 (0.25
`mm thick) using the solvent system described here. The
`
`separated classes were visualised by spraying the ctu-o—
`
`matogram with 0.1% 2',7'—dichlorofluorescein in metha-
`
`
`nol containing 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluer'e and by
`
`
`viewing or der ultiaviolet light. Tn'acylglycorols (TAGs)
`
`
`
`
`were on 'fied by redeveloping the chromatograro in the
`reverse direction of the second development using
`hexaneldiothyl etherlglacial acetic acid (80:20:2, by vol)
`
`after removal of the individual polar lipid classes. The
`
`fatty acids of the separated lipid classes were converted
`
`
`to their methyl actors on the adsorbEnt by acid-cot—
`
`alyzed trar'sastarification (22}. An aliquot of total lipid
`
`was also subjected to the same procedure. The re suiting
`
`fatty acid methyl esters were purified by HPTLC and re-
`covered from the adsorbent with hexaneldiethyl other
`(1:1, volfvoll.
`Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed on a Packard
`
`439 gas chromatograph equipped with a fused silica cap-
`
`illary column (50 In x 0-22 mm i.d.} coated with FFAP
`
`
`phase (S.G.E.. Milton Kcyneo, United Kingdom]. Sam'-
`
`
`
`
`ple applicatio was by Lin—column injection, and hyt‘ro—
`
`
`
`gen was used as the
`"a: gas. During the course of an
`analysis, the oven temperature was programmed to in-
`
`crease Eroru 50 to 225'0 Samples were also analyzed
`
`
`using an Omegawax 260 fused silica column (30 Ill
`
`
`
`0. 25 m i.d.. Bupelchem UK. Ltd" Essex. United King—
`
`
`
`domlwith the oven temperature programmed from 50 to
`2.60°C Fatty acid components were identified by refer-
`
`ence to a woll-character'zed fish oil fatty acid mixture,
`
`and the unsaturated nature of components was con-
`
`firmed by re—aralysia of samples after catalytic hydro-
`
`
`
`genation over H02. The separated components were
`
`
`
`quantitatod using a recording integrator linked to
`e
`
`chromatograph.
`Analysis ofnwleculor species. A SOD—pg portion oftotal
`
`lipid was separated into the component phospholipids
`
`by W alongside 20 pg of a cod retina total lipid
`
`standard using methyl
`acotatolpropan-z-olfcbloro—
`
`
`
`to
`’ethanoli‘llflfi‘b (Wvol) sq. KCI (25:25:25:10:9, by
`vol) as the developing solvent. The standard spots and
`
`
`the edge of the bands of pineal organ lipids ware visual-
`ized by exposure to iodine vapor, and the bands of ad-
`sorbent, commuting PC, PS, phosphatidylinoaitol (PI)
`
`
`and EG‘F‘, were scraped from the plate. The phospho-
`lipide were hydrolyzed on the silica with phospholipase
`
`C using a two-phase system of 1 mL diothyl outer and
`
`
`1 mL 0111.1 M sodium borate buffer, pH 7.5 at room tem
`
`AKER877ITC00070478
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`y analogy with the retina, it is probable that 22:611-3
`ia a major PU ”A of the lipids in the photoreceer cells
`of the fish pineal organ. To examine this hypothesis, we
`
`determined ir the present study the detailed lipid
`
`
`
`our position of the trout pineal with particular attention
`to the FUFA content and molecular spacios of phospho
`
`lipids. As far as We are aware, the detailed lipid compo-
`
`
`sidun of the pineal organ from fish has not. been re-
`ported previously and only a limited amount of informa-
`
`tion is available on the lipids of the organ from
`
`
`r animals (20,21). Information gained from the analysis
`
`of the trout pineal organ is of basic impm .snce as mam~
`
`
`malian pinealocytes are accepted as being phylogeneti-
`
`
`Cally derived from the fish pineal photoreceptor nails {2}.
`
`
`HAT‘B‘UALS AND M m
`
`
`
`Fish and pineal organs. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
`
`myhiaal of average weight 500 g were obtained from a
`
`
`
`com nercial fish far’n (Pisciculture Ballet, Angoulomo.
`
`
`
`France} where they had been maintained under natural
`conditions of water temperature and photoperiod. One
`
`hundred fish were killed by decapitation. Pineal organs
`were removed immediately from the fish, boron in liquid
`
`nitrogen and stored at —80'C until taken for analysis.
`Chemicals- and solvents. Phospholipaae C from Eucli-
`
`
`lus cereus was purchased from ‘Hoehringer Corporation
`
`
`fLordon) Ltd. (Iewes, East Sussex, England). Dulyl
`
`
`
`chlo do and anthracene Q-carboxylic acid were supplied
`
`
`
`by Aldrich Chemical Co. (Gilli xg am, Dorset, England).
`
`All other chemicals and biochemicols were purchased
`
`
`from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, Eng and], 3rd solvents of
`lugbvporformance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade
`were obtained from Rathbum. Chemicals (Walkerburn,
`
`Poeblcsstire, Scotland}.
`the
`Lipid extraction and analysis. After thawing,
`
`pineal organs were weighed and transferred to a Teflon-
`
`ill-glass homogcrizar. The organs wens homogenized in
`37 mL of chloroformlmcthanol (2:1, volfvol) essentially
`as described by Christie (22} to extract lipids. Solvent
`was removed under a Btflmm of nitrogen and the result-
`
`
`ing lipid extract desiccated overnight under vacuum in a
`
`
`preweighcd tube. The tube and contents were then
`
`reweighed to obtain the weight of the lipid extract which
`was redissolved in chloroform/methanol (2:1, who”
`and stored under an atmosphere of nitrogen at ~70'C be-
`tween anal yaea.
`To establish the lipid class composition, aliquots of
`
`
`lipid extract were subjected to high-performance thin-—
`
`
`layer chromatography { PTLC) alongside authentic
`
`
`
`standards using haaaue’diothyl ethon’glacial acetic acid
`
`
`(sauna. by roll or the developing solvent for the as
`-
`
`ration of neutral lipid classes and methyl acetate-{prov
`
`
`pa -2-olfchlorofomifmethanolf0.25% (wh’voll sq. KC]
`
`(25:25:25:10:9, by vol) for the separation of polar lipids.
`
`
`
`
`To confirm which polar li id classes were present,
`
`aliquots of total lipid were also subjected to two—dimer!
`
`
`
`clonal HPTLC. The polar lipid developing solvent sys-
`tem described previously was used for development in
`
`
`the first dimersion and chloroformlacetonefmethsnolo’
`
`acetic acidfwater (10:4 12:2:1, by vol} was employed for
`
`
`
`
`IJF'lDS, Vol. 29. no. 5 {1994}
`
`000002
`
`000002
`
`

`

`
`
`firm (613) 952—3247
`
`
`
`Order it 050853100904184553
`
`Tue Nov 16 14:05:01 2004
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`NOV 16 ’84 03:02?“
`
`313
`
`
`
`
`LLPlD COMPOSITION OF TROUT PINEAL ORGAN
`
`
`
`
`by EPG {9.9%}. No choline plasmalogeno were detected,
`
`
`whereas emanolarrjne plumalogena accounted for 11%
`of the total EPG fraction. PI and PS each accounted for
`
`less than 5% of the total lipid, and both phosphatidyl—
`
`
`glycerol (PG) and apingomyelin (SM) were present at less
`than 2% No cardiolipin or cerebroaidea were detected.
`
`Palmitic acid (16:0) comprised 23. 7% of the kitty acids
`
`
`in the total lipids and was the most abundant fatty acid
`
`
`in the pineal organ (Table 2]. The rronounaaturated
`18:1:1-9 and polyunsaturated 22:6:1-3 accounted for 17.6
`
`and 12.4%. respectively. of the total fatty acids, Overall,
`saturated. monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty
`acids accounted for similar proportions of the total lipid
`fatty acids. The fatty acid oompoaition ofTAGs ('Ihbla 2)
`
`was generally similar to that. of the total lipid although
`
`the proportion of 18:2n—6 {12.3%} waa notably higher,
`and that of 16:0 lower, than in total lipids.
`'
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`pasture under nitrogen for 2 h {26). At the end of the
`
`incubation period. 1,2-diradylglyoerols were extracted
`7driecl down under nitrogen and finally desiccated under
`
`
`
`vacuum for 1 h. Q-Anthroyl chlor do was prepared from
`9—mthracene carbowlic acid and oxalyl chloride as de—
`
`scribed by Goto et at. {27). The diradylglycerola were do
`
`' rivetized and puifled by a modification of the method of
`
`
`‘I‘akaniua and Kilo (28) as described elsewhere (19)
`, The 1-O.alk—1’-eny12-acyl derivatives were removed
`during the final HPI'LC purifimtion step. The 1.2-dia-
`
`cyl-S-anthmcyl-an-glycorola were separated by HPLC at
`
`
`1EL—20'C on an ODS column (25 x 0.46 cm. 5 pm particle
`
`size; Beckman Instruments UK. Ltd... High Wycombe.
`
`
`Buckinghzu shire, United Kingdom) using a Pye Uni-
`
`
`
`cam P114010 pump (Pye Unicorn Ltd... Cambridge.
`
`
`
`England} and two isocra 'c solvent systems, rrnithanollr
`propan-Z—ol {4:1, vollvol) at a flow rate of 1.0 mIJmin,
`and acetoniu'ile/propan—2-ol (7:3, volhml) at a flow rate
`
`of 1.0 mlfnfin as described by “Ramos and Kilo {28}.
`Peaks were detected using a Waters 470 scanning fluo-
`
`rescence detector {Elliptical UK Ltd. Edinburgh..Seot-
`
`
`land} with excitation and emission wavelengths: of 330
`and 460 nm. respectively. and quantified wring a Shi-
`
`
`madzu CRSA recording integrator (Annulment. Lump.
`
`
`
`United Kingdor-I}. Peaks were identified by their mele-
`tive retention time using 16:0f22:6n-3 as a reference
`
`peak. Di—docosahexaenoylglycerol (di—2216m3; Nu-Chek-
`. Prep. Elyaian1 MN} was also available for direct com-
`
`pariaon of retention times, as were a range of samples of
`
`
`known composition from previous studies (17.18.29).
`
`
`
`Each sample was chro autographed three times in each
`
`solvent system and the standard. deviations calculated.
`Where final peak areas were calculated by subtraction.
`the standard deviationn of the contributing peaks were
`added to give the final error.
`
`
`TABLE 2
`
`
`
`Fatty Acid Gorapoaliton {m3 of Total. Lipid and Lipid
`
`Classes from Trout Pineal Organ"
`
`_ Any} chain ..
`Thtal lipid
`TAG
`PC
`EGP
`14:0
`2.5
`3.5
`0.8
`0.2
`15:0
`0.9
`0.3
`0.3
`0.9
`16.00153
`-—
`--
`-—
`0.0
`16:0
`33.?
`17.4
`34.0
`10.7
`16:1m9
`——
`--—
`0.6
`~—
`163an
`5.3
`3.0
`1.3
`0.?
`17:0
`0.6
`0.4-
`0.3
`0.3
`18:0DMA
`——
`-
`-—
`0.4
`183041.00“.
`—
`—-
`-—
`2.2
`lii: ln—TDMA
`—
`——~
`—
`0 7
`18:0
`7.2
`4.2
`5.ii
`10.2
`13:1n-9
`17.6
`18.5
`18.3
`10.3
`18:.ln-‘i'
`4.0
`3.7
`2.4
`3.9
`18:2n—6
`9.3
`12.3
`1-8
`3.4
`18:311-3
`1.2
`2.0
`—
`0.3
`20:1:1-9
`2.5
`3.1
`0.4:
`1.4
`20:2n-6
`0.6
`1.2
`0.4
`0.9
`20:3nrtl
`0.4
`0.2
`0.3
`0.4
`20:4n—0
`1.6
`0.5
`2.0
`7.2
`20.3on3
`-—
`0.2
`-—
`—
`ammo
`0.9
`1.4
`0.3
`0.6
`20:5!1-3
`3.5
`3.9
`4.6
`4.8
`22:1n-11
`1.7
`2.0
`—
`--
`22:1n—0
`0.3
`0.3
`—
`—
`32:4n-v6
`0.1
`0.3
`-
`---
`22:511-6
`—
`0.2
`0.2
`0.4
`22:5n—5
`1.2
`1.5
`1.3
`2.2
`22.8n-8
`12.4
`12.6
`24.6
`36.0
`24: Ln-Q
`0. 7
`0.1
`—
`0.4
`Unidentified
`0.9
`1.4
`0.9
`0.?
`
`_
`
`Total saturated
`36.3
`25.8
`40.6
`23. 3
`
`
`ToLal monounsaturated
`32.6
`35.7
`23.0
`19.6
`
`
`
`”A
`’lbtal ‘
`81.2
`37-!
`35.5
`56.2
`'l‘otnl 11-3
`19.2
`21.9
`30.8
`43.9
`Total 11-6
`12.0
`15.2
`4.7
`12.3
`3.57 milling .... 1.60 1.44 6.55
`
`
`
`
`
`‘EGP. ethanolamina glycerophoepholipida; PC. phmphatidylv
`
`choline: TAG. hincylglycorols; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids;
`DMA. dimefliylaoetalc.
`
`
`
`RESULTS
`
`
`
`
`The lipid content. and lipid class composition of trout
`pineal organ are presented in Table 1 Anmnd 4. 9% of
`
`
`
`
`the wet weight of the pineal orgar was lipid of which al-
`
`
`
`most half {47%} was in the {on of“'AG. PC was the
`major polar lipid present (16. 5% of total lipid), followed
`
`
`TABLE 1
`
`
`
`
`Lipids of Khan! Pineal Organ: Lipid Clue Composition“
`
`Lipid clans
`H 3‘
`‘32 Thin] llpid
`Gunnery! eaten
`3.8 t 0.3
`
`on n 2.1
`tile
`ice
`Free atty acids
`3.4 2: 0.0
`Cholesterol
`5 1' :t 0.4
`Diacylglyoarnla
`l 5 t 0.1
`Ethanolemino glycorophuopholipida
`9.9 I: 0.6
`thphatidylgiyoeml
`1.4 :I: 0.1
`Phosphatidylinoaitol
`3 2 3: 03
`Phosphatidylcerine
`3.4 a: 0.3
`Phosphatidylclioline
`16.5 a: 0.8
`Sphing’gmyeiinm
`"Value“ are moans : SD of three dctarminatimm.
`
`000003
`
`UPIDS. Val. 25. no. 5 {1594}
`
`AKER877ITC00070479
`
`000003
`
`

`

`firm (513:) 952424?
`
`flrder all 050853100P04134553
`
`Tue NW 16 lefizfll 20M
`
`Page 5 M“ 8
`NOV 18 'EM 0330850“!
`
`314
`
`TAMI!
`
`R1. HENDERSKDN ET AL.
`
`uwmxamé,wc,‘gwnw.mu.'..«mm«
`
`in mmaunaatmmd fatty acids and PUFA which mm-
`priaad 44.]. NM 311%, mwmfimly. uf mm mm fatty
`acids in mm thulipid {Tabla 33* The lessen: m? 18:11:»?
`and 18:11:14 am and 10.2%} in PG were highw than in
`my other lipid glass, and, of all the phnlphelipids PG
`had the highasn mutant af Iafln-G. In 3M mama than
`half (58.2%} a! the fatty midi: were mnnmnmturawd.
`
`mainly data m We prewum (if a weary high ymporfian of
`24:1 (dfiifl‘lhl. FUFA mmmfiwfl timely 09% ml“ 022: 0M fatty
`Marla (Tabla 3}.
`In all
`lipid classes, 20:51:54 was present in small
`amounts am! mum “caudal 6.0% of that mmpcmenl
`
`fatty acids, The lung chain manoennlc fatty acid
`22:12:14]. ohmwed in total lipid wan; wacmtrated in
`Tfifi. wlmm it accounted fur mmd 2% 0f the fatty
`mm 01" all the lipid chum TAG m ammmd um
`biglmat lewd 0!" 14:0.
`The principal malecular spasms af PC PE PS and PT
`
`
`are presented in Table 4, Tax: molecular spams pre-
`dominated :11 PC unruly 1%:m2Snail mu} 155mm
`which mmmd Pm 33 $3 and 2a5% rwmcfiwm at flu:
`total malmlar maths-,3 cef {hi3 pfiwphollpld. DWUWL, di-
`mmmd amt dlmmammm swam malt mm—
`prinadleuflmnfi‘fiyofthemmmwdmgmmtof
`
`mannmafmhedwpUF‘A spasm totallsd 3.9%“ within
`which lflzm2rfia~3 was Hm xmm‘ cum neat. Malemlar
`
`spacial; whining 22:6:1—3 mam partlcwuly abundant in
`pa Di~22zfimfl wmprimd 13.0% a” the mm. and
`mumsés and 1%:mgrfi wam hath pment at; lamb al'
`mam man lfi‘fiz. in PE! 18:0!222fiw-3 ammm far almmt
`half (43.9%)
`of“
`the total malacular 3min, and
`1‘5:0J'22:6n-3 was the only ether species presam‘ at a. level
`all greater than 10%. Tim mum. abundant mlecular
`apeflas 01‘ PI mm 1$:mn:4n$ which amounted {car 313%.
`mm: maxim cuntaining 28:42:”!«6.
`lfifllfiflflmlfi, mm»
`grim 14.6% at” the mmlmulmr apmiaa (if Pl
`find
`IBWfinoa mauled for 10.5%, the higheat level For a
`spefies containing 20:511-3 nbsewed in any 91’ that phea-
`ghnlipida examined»
`
`
`
`W M
`
`flmugh 0m pineal urgsm in an adjunct: «:6 film brain, it
`in brown m haw mmlved From a wall-djflemntiumd phur
`mmceptive argsn that "Le fimquenfly considered to he a
`functianal third eye in Iowa: vertebrates {S}, In fact, to
`date, the graperfiea eatablialmd far the pineal photon»
`mptnm have been unbridled w the wfinal Wprw
`Md via: new (3}, Thug mafia: Maren”: belwmn aha
`951M311 and mm mlntaa to Kim neumnal omaniaatlnn.
`which is almple in the pineal but complex in the retina.
`film. plum planar-capture mafia contact with second
`arden- neum that; send their nuns to brain uentersa
`Retinal phatamwwwm, on the ”thin- hand, am in wntucl
`with bipolar mills that, in mm, ammunimm with gm»
`glam will! and numemm inmmm that; am gramm-
`{humontaL amncrina,
`interpwxlfbrm calla}.
`(lunacy
`
`mun tbs mtla af phawnmplaum to other neurons is
`
`
`much higher in the pi aal than in the T813113, and the
`lipid compaaltian of the pineal man can be matted m
`reflect that a! ma phutmewpmr mils.
`
`AKER877ITC00070480
`
`mm mm Cumwaitim (m; M mam mam rm. Mm
`Pimnl firm“
`
`Acyl chain
`14:0
`15:0
`16:0
`lfizln~9
`{6:11:13
`17:0
`18:0
`18:1n-9
`15:1nw?
`1622116
`18:3m3
`2021:1«9
`WIRED-6
`2:013:16
`20:41:45
`Ethan-3
`203113141
`20:36:10
`film“
`23:11:43
`221mm.
`22:5n—fi
`22fiu~3
`22:6an
`34:0
`$421109
`Unidmliflm
`
`PI
`0.3
`0 a
`M0
`m
`-
`0,?
`33.3
`53
`1,3
`1.5
`G. I
`0.?
`0x2
`0.3
`214
`..
`0, I
`0‘?
`«w
`-—-
`0.5
`._,
`{M
`7.0
`w
`{Mn
`(M;
`
`PS
`0.3
`0‘7
`3.0
`w
`91!
`0.4
`38.2
`5.5
`2.0
`In;
`(M
`1.2
`0.‘
`~
`1.0
`--
`.....
`L8
`w
`-
`0.9
`0.4
`3‘0
`29.4
`m
`N
`01$
`
`PG
`0.3
`03
`m'3’
`M
`11,0
`GA”:
`5.4
`m0
`302
`3.0
`{W
`1.4
`L1
`Ml
`L8
`-
`015
`LE
`m
`—
`m9
`._
`0»a!
`W8
`m
`w
`1.1
`
`SM
`046
`0 4
`192
`
`«13.5
`0.6
`9.5
`3.9
`13
`23
`w
`0A
`L0
`1.0
`0.5
`-
`04.2
`03
`m
`0.6
`-
`~—
`0.2
`19
`0.0
`$5.9
`1.3
`
`31.8
`1'17
`42.5
`{RE
`'1th uturai'aci
`58.32
`drill
`15.5
`YE
`Thu] mmmmalunted
`833'
`81.3
`3-5.2
`#33
`Thu! PUFA
`£2
`3&5
`MA
`133
`W n~3
`W
`m 33.48
`20.9
`Total m6
`
`mama Mill {l M 63$! Lara
`
`
`
`
`‘30. phmphafidylglywoi; FL phmphmdxlinmml; PS. phmu
`phaudxlsefina; SM. sphiugmmyallm PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty
`acids.
`
`Each. of that»: palm lipid flames had a 3mm: (“arty mid
`
`mmmaificn. In PC, 1620 and 22:6n~fl wax-ca tha principal
`co panama and together amunted far nearly 60% 91'
`the tonal fatty acids 131-135th in tha yhasphnlipifl
`fThhla 2‘}, In mntram 16:0 wmpfiaed nnly 10.7% of the
`fatty maids in E011. whereas than law! of 2mm (36%)
`was thus: 312$th ubaawad in my lipid wlxam m a came-v
`qusnw, the mm! mum at PUFA in EGP {53.2% was:
`the hlgfiw: at all lipid mum Only the E0? fraction
`winners! {Imam}! are-am» haw tranmfihylnllm of 1-0.
`alk-l’—enyl linked ether chasm
`PI Was. umque amnng the: lipid clwsea in that 20:4n~6
`mm; a major mmponexxt am! amounted EM WAVE) of 0m
`fatty unifiafi whamas “Eaflwil campfiwd Md} [0%
`(Table 3}. A5 a consaqumcve, the overall ratio at" 1141 to
`11—6 PUFA in Pl was the Iuwgst of any lipid dass. The
`
`anturatad fatty acid 13:‘0 mm also a maim- f‘aatty acidm
`PI P3 was chamcmfized by a high mammal. of 18: 0 and
`22:fin~3, cwplafi with a low mutant at 1&9; PG was rich
`
`LIPIDS. Vol 29, m, 5 (1994)
`000004
`
`000004
`
`

`

`__ Mm (”613) 9523247
`
`
`Twm 4
`
`flrdfir # 050853100P04154$53
`
`Tue Nov m 14:05:01 2004
`
`Mm:
`NOV 16: ’aa
`
`if; 01'“ E
`03133321301
`
`
`LIPID WWMTIQN 0F TROLW PI HEAL flRflAN
`
`31 fl
`
`
`MNMW &W M thphmnpma Mm Wm M 0mm“
`
`Men
`M
`PC
`PE
`93
`V!
`meUWi
`2025:2236
`332-Wfi
`WWfi
`EaimimmWA
`Itmfi
`lficmfi
`l‘fimifi
`162WMMI
`w:m:5
`mama
`laxmzfi
`lfiflfiififl
`18;W:5
`MMQWWHWWA
`152133210
`i3flm0
`10:m8:$
`lgflflflfl
`1192:1005
`M»mmnm
`E5.W1520
`Sairwawwmammmw
`10200130
`lfiW‘ifizl
`Dimmumn:wakd
`(Mi 1: (10
`1.2 a 0.1
`0.6 a: 0.2
`0.8 a: (L1
`m;uw:1
`
`201223-1
`m
`.0
`a 3 x: aa
`m m
`Wflm m mum and m mum at m510mm amminnunm a: x $13 It mm mam that mm W saturated fatty MM“ mm
`imam :m the anl {uranium Mammy 16W Whining: mimw fatty mm mm any mid”mm“: firm mt mm {mm the:
`W mmnmm WW mums swimming 13M0 Mam with m mat-timing 2.0551750 and 33030 W phw
`fimfldyiuhmmm W meéxmfiyimmmmmmg Pi pumpmmimiml; W phmphnudylmrimg Pam. anMmth
`ram; Mm
`
`0.6 2» 0x0
`t1 3: 0.53
`1.0 2:: 0,1
`
`L2 3: 0.1
`8f! 1 (Mr
`333 1t 10
`LB 3 915%
`34 a: 023
`SH.) :1: (W
`5W :1: an
`‘15 1: 0:1
`1.5 3: CH2
`
`0.5 :5 EU
`9&9 a: 0.1
`360 a: 1.?
`w
`0.5 x 0.0L
`
`fit? a: 0.1
`
`230,0 a: 1.0
`2,5 :3: 0,3
`
`1.0 :t 0.9
`13.0 x 03
`4.6 8 (M
`
`3.3 1: mil
`#3 I 0.}.
`363.1 1 40.3
`23 m; 01
`L0 at: {Ml
`33? x: ml
`9.15 x 0.3
`2.? 1011
`0.8 t 0.2
`
`0.5 2:: 0,1
`3.7 a 011
`15M :1: mt
`£63101
`2,1 2 EM
`
`{M a 0,0
`0
`1.12 t QM
`0.2 at (M
`
`03 1 M
`1:9 3 EM}
`5614 a 0.1
`
`0,? a 03
`LB 3: 03
`3&0 x 0.3
`LE at: 0.1
`Ll a: 0&3.
`3.? a: 03
`“1.0 a 0.0
`0% it $1.1
`4,? i: 011
`
`0.7 t 0.},
`w
`5.10 x: Mi
`L1 will
`L3 :1: 031
`
`Li 3:. {Li
`
`33 s: cm
`03 3%: 0A)
`
`-«
`033 a: DD
`m at: 0.0
`
`0.2; at 05!
`4a.} a {1.0%
`U13 :4. 8.8%
`100 :1; RB
`£10 a: 052
`101i at: 0.1
`m :5: 0‘3
`37.8 t 10
`(M R (L)
`
`0% 3; 0‘0
`0‘? in: G“)
`MS 9; 0.15
`(lama
`w
`
`M
`
`6,0 :t 0.3
`0.3 at 0‘0
`
`The iipifi mutant if we mm pineal (-13% 3:! Wm;
`waight} in almmt mmiy Way between that found far
`the brain and retina {6.8 and 3.1%. mammal?) of” this:
`Mme. spades (m). Hawwm, the: level oi? TAG in than lipid
`{if the pineal {’W%) in mmiéssmbly higher Khan the 831
`and 30% {mum in this iipid at“ film brain maxi mum, but
`i3 mwflhaima 1:19am in m mm. The im 0f 139.0 in
`braim mm mm M" mu!» am him-m m M highar than
`in the same flames Mm cad (10). An influe‘msfimg {Mar
`may in the fact mm; W mm mmimd warm fax-mm
`
`fish» It. in we“ Imam that [W fink, minding mm;
`haw; mm: lipid, gunman :11 their fies!) than mix wfici
`mammal (30} mm the
`aim mum qi‘
`mural Linnea Mm him“ M! an: m fish at
`whammy higii TAG 11.5st m a specific feature: of than.
`Mpida 0f twat- neuml than“ remains m be wmbliaham
`A main“: {Mime M m “mm 0f firm and mm in
`
`annual is mm high: mmmrfim as!" E0?!” in W mm} iipid
`{153,3 1:2» In 8mm mi msi warm. the: EMPW Tahiti in Main
`iipid in uppmflmawly 1.21 mm The Wm! at“ E6? in aha
`Emmi fluid is mum? lawer than that 0? PC, rim
`EGPIPG ratio basing 0.021, This value is closer to 1110
`037:1 thinner-wad far the mm at" these two phwphnfipixw in
`
`the whim 09' mm twat amt and {10). Way. athanalamine
`
`pimalngem mutant a!“ this pimal in mush. WWI“ than
`that offiah brain (36.43% MEGP} (25) and dam in that
`at" retina (415% 31’ EMF; MI. MN. unpuhiimai mm).
`The WW: :3!“ mmhrmidea in film lipids 9f 10?“: mum! in
`aim mum twink} MI whim than 13min. M £5 thaw law
`amwm (if athmuimim nimmlagam @331} This:
`tab.
`mam «if mnfiiwfipm in Significant mm in 33mm}
`lipids is unusual m min tiyid aims in a mmu mums»
`mat mindwchmdhnd mmhmma and ham Men [mud in
`lipid BMW Emu: bath th retina am! brain (10);
`”Hm total {mid and mmpmmnt lipid dmm at the
`3mm! mam, with him minim of SM. warn inflame»
`mm by m when“ ufWFA. Namflheim. film can“
`WM anUFA in ma mm 0W1 nftmut organ {310290} is
`Inmr than flm wmapondmg mines of" 4M and 00.10%
`mmmfi fear him brain and mm, respectiwiy, mi film
`W 99pr £10)“ and 5m mnaidmmhiy 1mm than the:
`mm maxim! {43.6%} 61‘ mini ma {mm rm pinmi {20}.
`
`Thu dimer-Emmy» 97f {any Mich mm the: variwa fluid
`
`
`aim :0an in wall mfibfiahed pa
`mu FM mm
`we, than 1131’!ng mmanniu fatty acid 30:11:14}, we»-
`cmma :1an in TAG». TM abmmiofflfia fatty acid, which
`
`000005
`
`MEWS. m 20. m 6 (13M)
`
`AKER877ITC00070481
`
`000005
`
`

`

`gamma..-.amm.—m.aw¢__..-A._
`
`
`H.,-..._....._m__.m._._;._.,~.
`
`firm “(6135 952~5242
`
`flrder 9‘ 05085 3100P041345 5 3
`
`Tue. Nov 1% 14:ll5:01 2004
`
`NQV 1E!
`
`Page 7 of a
`‘84 QBIEEF’M
`
`315
`
`
`RJ. HEMBEREWN ETAL
`
`prism-Mm m talmnnid mmplankmu. is n mmmon literature
`01‘ fish phmphnlipids (32). The 191.11%. lfitfinwfi waa aim
`confined in Tm. It is nambln that. film mm}. lipid of
`pineal gland mntaina higher levels cf this fatty gem
`than brain m the rat {2ft}g almaugh it remains to be leap
`tab-fished whether the 18:331-6 is apeclllmlly associated
`with TAG. Th3 preaenm pf high levala M 1&0 in PC ill a
`cshamulamua l‘wmm (if this phmsplmlipw.
`including
`that extraqu [mm mm: brain and rating (10) and
`bowine pinafll argan (21). 13m 1920? of nwral unsung am
`lmnwn to be spadfically enriched in 22:63:43 (31), and
`this warm aim at nuLable faamm nhuwed in the present
`amid}! nf that EL}? fmm aw hunt pineal. Th3 value far
`22:6m3 in £2035" (36%) la alightly higlmr mm m mnwm
`in HQ? Mm tmut. brain (MW, but. lease: than that. at“ will
`retina EGP {46.8%} of“ the same speciag (1m. Interest-
`ingly, the 22333.3 contents at? P0, P1 and PS found here
`in the pineal an: all intermediate betwean than found
`in than brain Mill in film retina.
`This Fl a5“ ELM: pinml urgam mnfpr'mml m that: me” an»
`mbliahud pattern in {in}; wastage, whamby Pl hats at
`higher content of 20:4.11—6 than mlmr phmphnlipida and
`is consequently ch master-212d by a law ratia Elf 11-3 in [NE
`PUFA (‘32). The actual mutant. of 20:4.n-fi in the pinaal
`Pl [214% {31’ total fatty with]! lag markedly higher than
`that mwm fur trout brain (10.2%} Md mfim {14.53%}
`and for the: same blames 01‘ ml MA. and 12.5%, rupee-
`tivelyl {10% The results want that in mg of tlm
`20:4n'6 tenant of P] the pineal exceeds retina which, in
`tum, 9':de brain. In the ran, the level pf MAIL-6 in the
`mm 11de Ham the pineal aman in also high” than
`that {mud in brain liplda {20}. Thins: ip malaiem will;
`this idem mm m which phpmtmnmlwtim might M‘-
`tlvatc phoaphalipase A? with flu. subsequent formation
`of eimaanm‘da €33). An invalvement cf eiwaanoids (ls-
`rived {mm 20:41:14,;
`in 1.115 lightrdflpendent. mntml ml“
`melamnin pmtluction i5 thamfnm inflimlwi.
`maximum with that Meg-all fatty acid mmpmltim pf
`EGP. PE mislmd the highwt level (new of cllwllfirfi
`molecular apwlea of the phwpholipida examined. How-
`ever, 1:13.: valua was less than that observed firm-£11181); in
`mu: brain {H.9T9), and mmiderably lam: than that in
`trout mfim (41.3%} (1?).
`likewise. divflfi molemlar
`apaciaa of P0 we! P3 ware laws abundant m the pmaal
`than the mafia. and only pimal PC had a higher divwfll
`cunbent
`than the mneanding‘ phosphnlipids from
`brain. The {1mm molecular speciaa were all as expected,
`With 16:0?2216 and lfiflflfifl duminating m, ISMZIG,
`MAME“; and 18111323.”: aim-h wmpriaing ”RE—30.1% 9f
`PE and 1.13:W:6 being 11.1%meth m spams In
`
`mums... P: m m ll mm m be mlmimly impom
`[shad will-4 mmmmam-a mmlmm ymnloculu
`species. while Cm: PUFA species are abundant {11218}.
`In trout, retinal PI waa pmdominanlly Iflzflflméu-fi
`
`140.1%) and brain PI 18:fl&fi;fin-fi (42.3%} {1'7}. This: tip»
`
`aux: amcificity in the malwulpr minim mmpwltim of PI
`was cpnfimm in cod, in whim 1820mm4n~$ WM the: pm»
`dnmimmt apedfls in liver well me (36.? and 49.1%, m-
`mpectlvelyl and 18:]!20Mn-6 was the mm must abun-
`dant (13,29). In brain. 18:{W£}:5n-3 and lazmfilzfin-fl
`mmpfiled mam half the PI (13) with araclfidanyl spacial]
`
`UWDS. Vol. 2% m. 5 (1994}
`
`000006
`
`
`
`l6.3%. wherpaa in mum lawns,
`totalling ml);
`1mm», 1310;253:923 and lflzflffiflfi wan the ma“ abun»
`
`Jam. spexlm, in that urdar, Walling 84.5% MW {18).
`The PI from 21mm. pineal argan thus closely nae blea
`
`Wat of trout reruns with 18:ma:4:146 predmnlnam The
`130&0: 5&3 species an clmmalanstic MP1 {mm trout.
`and and brain camprlzml manly ll}3% «3f twat plum PI
`Thu. althmugh it; ill mammal mflacwt tn film 0min and it!
`very alomly mmiamd With tlw brain, the: primal in silk
`must. ‘dentlml m retina in laws of PI companion. Fur-
`
`them-Lore, no 18:1!243 wan found. in the PE of the pineal
`argan. wherwa this molacular ape-Clea mmpfims be-
`twsen 5?! and 133% of flab brain P0 (17.13).
`Mtllmgh ILM mm lipid of him mm: pinnal arias: has a.
`Imam mutant ml" wan-.3 than. that. found. in brain a:
`retina, the level is neverthelwa atlll lfigher than that. usuv
`Elly observed in Elmer nonmeruml tissues, such as. liver or
`munch E32}. Furfiwnnnm. the Efihfin—B mnlant uf lndi‘rid-
`mil phmpbmllpida la: aimilar m that; fauml in the retina
`and brain. Umqmfly. the.
`llpid pmnwmlfiwn pf the
`pineal mama cliaplays [autumn miml of mmwa llamas.
`Di-22;Bn—3 mmlmular species may be urfique tn phu-
`tomeptor membranes as them are abundant in rod
`outer segments 0f many animal apecies and have re—
`«me film been faund. albeit in mafia: nmaunm, in the
`WWW rallm M” larval barring (19). The QMWI” new
`mama at“ tlw pimal phuwmmptpm, Mulch cammpond m
`wawlike @113, m not as well dimeloped mmpm'ad to
`£35,050 of the mfinal phnmmpmr (3}, and tlm merall
`amount of mtar segment. membrane per phatmeccptur
`cell is probably mmiderably law in the pinml than. in
`film mtinu: Thin might; “plain why the. high lamla cf cli-
`mama malamlm waving whlch Malaria the: PC,
`and especially ?3 and PE, of tram: and cod retina {17.18)
`wars not. nhaemd in tha tmut pineal.
`In mnclusian, the present study demonstrates far the
`first film: that, in terms {If lipixl campasitlmn, the pineal
`mmblsss the mtina mum almly than the brain or
`Mall” timma. Phatmmpmr mambmnea cam mm M ism
`law from a pawlaulon of purified pineal calla: (34.) and
`mlynis of their mmponent 329nm may disclnm apccific
`adaptatium in lipid compositlan. This opens in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket