throbber
6014
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6014—6020
`DO|:10.1 021/]1‘9009035
`
`JOURNAL
`
`AG RICULTURAL_AND
`
`FOOD CHEMISTRY
`
`Investigation of Natural Phosphatidylcholine Sources:
`
`Separation and Identification by Liquid
`Chromatography—Electrospray Ionization—Tandem Mass
`Spectrometry (LC—ESl—MSZ) of Molecular Species
`
`JULIE LE GRANDOISJ' ERIC MARCi-iIONI,*’T MINJIE ZHAOj FRANCESCA GIUFFRIDAF
`SAlD ENNAHAR,T AND FRANCOISE BINDLERT
`
`+Laboratoire de Chimie Analytique et Sciences de 1"Aliment, lPHC—DSA, Universite de Strasbourg,
`CN RS, 74, route du Rhin, 67400 lllkirch, France, and iiNestle’ Research Center, Nestec Limited, Post Office
`Box 44, CH—1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland
`
`
` his study is a contribution to the exploration of natural phospholipid (PL) sources rich in long-chain
`polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) with nutritional interest. Phosphatidylcholines (PCs) were
`purified from total
`lipid extracts of different food matrices, and their molecular species were
`
`separated and identified by liquid chromatography—electrospray ionization—tandem mass spectro-
`
`
`metry (LC- SI M82). Fragmentation of lithiated adducts allowed for the identification of fatty acids
`linked to the glycerol backbone. Soy PC was particularly rich in species containing essential fatty
`acids, such as (18:2—18:2)F’C (34.0%), (16:0—18:2)
`3C (20.8%), and (18:1—18:2)PC (16.3%). PC
`from anima sources (ox liver and egg yolk) contained
`major molecular species, such as (16:0—18z2)
`PC, (16:0—18:1)PC, (18:0—18:2)PC, or (18:0—18:1)PC. Finally, marine source (krill oil), which was
`
`
`
`source for food supplementation with LC-PUFA—PLs, particularly eicosapentaenoic acid ( PA) and
`
`docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).
`
`
`particularly rich in (16:0—20:5)PC and (16:0—22:6) 3C, appeared to be an interesting potential
`
`KEYWORDS: Phosphatidylcholine; PUFA; supplementation; molecular species; lithium; LC—ESl—MS
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) play very important roles
`in many aspects of human health, in particular in reducing risks of
`cardiovascular diseases,
`inflammation, hypertension, allergies,
`and immune and renal disorders (1, 2), Among these,
`linoleic
`acid (18:2) and d—linolenic acid (18:3) are considered as essential
`fatty acids (FAs), because they have to be necessarily supplied by
`the diet and cannot be synthesized by the human organism.
`
`Moreover, they are the precursors of long—chain PUFAs (LC—
`
`
`PUFAs), in particular eicosapentaenoic acid ( PA) and docosa—
`hexaenoic acid (DHA), which are essential for brain and retina
`development (3—5). It is still unclear though whether the con—
`sumption of the precursors (18:3 and 18:2)
`is sufficient
`to
`synthesize the necessary amounts of LC—PUFAs or if diet
`supplementation with EPA and DHA may be required. In fact,
`while some reports showed infant formulas supplemented with
`18:3 giving retina development comparable to human breast milk
`(containing DHA) (6, 7), others showed reduced visual maturity
`
`with infant formulas supplemented with 18:3 compared to for—
`
`
`mulas that were supplemented with )HA (4,8). However, there is
`agreement among investigators on the crucial importance of
`PUFAs in the diet and their essential role in human nutrition.
`
`
`*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: + 33—
`390—244—326.
`Fax:
`+ 33—390—244—325.
`E—mail:
`eric.marchi0ni@
`pharma.u—strasbg.fr.
`
`
`
`The natural molecular forms of PUFAs are typically triacyl—
`glycerols (TAGS) and phospholipids (PLs). While TAGs are quite
`a homogeneous group of lipids, PLs can be divided into three
`classes: glycerophospholipids, ether glycerolipids, and sphingo—
`phospholipids. Glycerophospholipids represent the most wide—
`spread PL class and can be divided into subclasses according to
`their polar head, with phosphatidylcholine (PC) being the pre—
`dominant one. In the human dict, TAGs are the major carriers of
`7As, with 50— 100 g/day for an adult, followed by PLs, with 2— 10
`g/day (9). Studies showed however that, when it comes to FA
`biodisponibility, PLs are much more efficient carriers than
`"AGs(3,10, II).
`Supplementation of food products with PUFA—rich phospho—
`lipids (PUFA—PLs) has recently emerged as an interesting way of
`increasing the assimilation and the health benefits of LC—PUFAs
`
`in the human body. The preparation of food supplements con—
`
`
`taining pure molecular species (rich in 18:2, 18:3, DHA, and a PA)
`is not only technically challenging but may turn out to be costly
`and industrially unrealistic. The solution may however lie in the
`exploration and tapping of natural PL sources rich in molecular
`species with PUFAs of nutritional interest.
`This study describes the development of an analytical method
`intended for the determination of molecular species from glycer—
`ophospholipids. PC was picked as the model and was extracted
`and purified from various food matrices: soy as a plant source,
`egg yolk and ox liver as animal sources, and krill oil as a marine
`
`pubs.acs.org/JAFC
`
`Published on Web 08/22/2009
`000001
`
`©2009 American Chemical Society
`
`AKER877ITCOO740544
`
`Petition for Inter Panes Review
`of Us, Patent 8,278,351
`Exhibit
`ENZYMOTEC -1013
`
`
`
`000001
`
`

`

`Article
`
`animal source. Molecular species profiles were determined using
`liquid chromatography—electrospray ionization—tandem mass
`spectrometry (LC—ESI—Msz) by fragmenting lithiated adducts
`of the molecular species of PC,
`This analytical method can be advantageously used by the food
`industry to screen both new potential sources of bioactive
`ingredients and the quality of their raw materials.
`
`MATERIALS AND MET ODS
`
`
`
`Materials. All solvents used for high—performance liquid chromatog—
`raphy (HPLC) analyses were {PLC—grade. Methanol was purchased from
`VWR (Strasbourg, France), and acetonitrile was purchased from Sigma—
`Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Chloroform (Sigma—Aldrich, Steinheim,
`Germany), methanol, and n—heptane (Carlo Erba, Val de Reuil, France)
`used for lipid extraction and PC purification were of analytical grade.
`Wash solution was prepared from sodium chloride of analytical grade and
`Ultrapure water (Millipore, Molsheim, France). Soy PC standard was
`purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Hens” eggs (6.5%
`PC), soybeans (Glycine max) (0.7% PC). and ox liver (1.7% PC) were
`purchased from a local retailer. Krill oil (29.0% PC) has been kindly
`provided by Nestec SA (Lausanne, Switzerland)
`Sample Preparation and Lipid Extraction. Preparation was differ-
`ent for each sample depending upon its physical state. Both soy beans and
`ox liver were grinded, but only ox liver was lyophilized after grinding. Egg
`yolk was lyophilized but without grinding. Krill oil was fractionated and
`analyzed as such without further preparation. Grinding was achieved
`under cryogenic conditions (liquid nitrogen, 3 steps of 5 min) using a 6870
`Freezer/Mill (Spex CertiPrep, Stanmore, U.K.). Total lipids were ex—
`tracted according to Folch et a1. (12), with minor modifications. A total of
`1 g of the treated food matrix was suspended in 30 mL of a CHCi3/CH3OH
`(2: 1, v/v) mixture and shaken mechanically for 20 min. The suspension was
`centrifuged at 8500g for 10 min, and the supernatant was removed and
`washed with 5 mL of sodium chloride aqueous solution (1%, wfv). The
`organic phase containing the lipid fraction was removed, evaporated
`under vacuum, and dried under a gentle stream of N2. The total lipid
`extract was weighed and dissolved in 1 mL of CHC13.
`Liquid Chromatography. Flash Chromatograp/iy. A 150 mg
`aliquot of the total lipid extract (from krill oil, soy, or egg) was subjected
`to preparative flash chromatography (CombiFlash retrieve, Serlabo,
`Entraigues sur la Sorgue, France) onto a 15 g silica cartridge precondi—
`tioned with n—heptane. Elution was performed at a flow rate of 10 mL/min
`using 60 mL of CHClg, then 120 mL of CHClg/CH30H/H20 (35:65:4,
`V/vj‘V) mixture, and finally 120m L ofethanol for a column wash. Fractions
`(10 mL) were collected and tested by thin—layer chromatography (TLC)
`using silica plates, CHClyCHgOH/HZO (3526524, v/v/v) as an eluent, and
`phosphomolybdic acid in ethanol (20:80, W) to visualize compounds. PC
`was identified in comparison of its retention factor (R;) to the one of soy
`PC (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) as a reference. Fractions
`containing pure PC were pooled and evaporated under vacuum.
`HPLC. A chromatographic system made of a 616 controller, a 2424
`ELS detector, and a 717Plus autosampler (Waters, Saint Quentin Falla—
`vier, France) was used to perform the chromatographic analyses. High—
`purity nitrogen from a nitrogen generator (Domnik Hunter, Villefranche—
`sur—Saone, France) was used as a nebulizing gas at a pressure of 45 psi. The
`drift tube temperature was set at 45 °C. Separations were performed at
`room temperature using a 20 min linear gradient ranging from CHCl3;
`CH30H (88:12, W) to CHClg/CH3OH/l M formic acid adjusted to pH 3
`with triethylamine (28:60:12, ViV/V) (13). This chromatographic system
`and this gradientwere both used for PC purification and to check purity of
`the isolated PC.
`ipidic
`To isolate PC from ox liver, a 100 mg aliquot of the ox liver
`extract was injected on a 250 x 10 mm, 10 ,er normal—phase Lichrospher
`column (Interchim, Montlucon, France). A total of2/3 ofthe mobile—phase
`flow, which was set at a rate of 2 mL/min, was diverted, ahead of the * LSD
`inlet, to a fraction collector. The PC peak was identified in comparison of
`its retention time to the standard one, and time windows were set to collect
`the PC peak.
`The purity of PC isolated from each matrix was checked by injecting a
`fraction of the purified samples on a 150 >< 3 mm. 3 pm Luna normal phase
`(Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) using a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Purity (P)
`
`
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`of the isolated PC was calculated as follows:
`
`6015
`
`P
`
`Arc
`:—><
`At
`
`100
`
`where AFC is the PC peak area and AL is the total of peak areas on the
`chromatogram.
`Separation and Identification ofMolecular Species by LC—
`ESI—iMS. Molecular species of PC were determined using a Prostar
`HPLC system made of two 210 solvent delivery modules, a 410 auto—
`sampler, and a 1200 L triple quadrupole mass spectrometer fitted with an
`ESI source (Varian, Les Ulis, France). High—purity nitrogen (Domnik
`Hunter) was used as a nebulizing gas, set at 46 psi, and as a drying gas, set
`at 300 °C. Separation was performed on a C 18 reverse—phase 250 X 3 mm.
`3 pm Isis Nucleodur column (Macherey—Nagel) using an isocratic flow of
`CH3CN1°CH3OH (40:60. Viv) containing 0.1% NH4OH at a rate of 1 mL/
`min. A split system however allowed the HPLC effluent to enter the mass
`spectrometer at a flow rate of0.2 mL/‘min. To help the identification ofthe
`molecular species, 3 mL of 10 mM lithium formate was added to 1 L of
`mobile phase. Major detected ions were [M+ Li]+ referring to the mo—
`lecular ion with a lithium adduct. Acquisition was performed in positive
`mode in a mass range between m/z 450 and 900. mi: ([M + Li]+) were
`fragmented in positive mode (M82), which was used to identify FA linked
`to the PC glycerol backbone. The mass range was set between 171/: 200 and
`600 for fragmentation products. The dwell time was set to 0.2 s for each
`m/:. Argon was used as a collision gas, and collision energy was set to 30 V.
`The percentage of each molecular species was calculated as follows:
`
`%
`
`_ A(peak(m/z))
`7 2A(peaks)
`
`X 100
`
`where A(peak(m,°z)) refers to the peak area of the selected mfz and
`ZA(peaks) refers to the sum of all peak areas. Analyses were performed
`
`in triplicate, with results expressed as mean a: standard deviation (SD).
`Gas Chronriaiagraphic Analysis of FA. A 3400 Varian gas
`chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was used for
`the analysis of FA methyl esters (FAMEs) after transesterification of
`
` able 1. FA Profiles 01 Purified PC from Soybeans, Egg Yolk, Krill Oil, and Ox
`Livera
`
`egg yolk PC
`krill oil PC
`ox liver PC
`
`FAs
`soy PC (%)"
`W“
`(W
`cob
`
`14:0
`15:0
`16:0
`16:1 (n—7)
`17:0
`18:0
`
`ridC
`nd
`19.9 :: 0.03
`nd
`0.2 :: 0.01
`4.8 :: 0.02
`
`
`
`9.4 :: 0.08
`57.6 :: 0.10
`5.5 :: 0.01
`nd
`l'ld
`nd
`nd
`nd
`0.8 :: 0.01
`nd
`nd
`0.5 :: 0.01
`nd
`nd
`0.3 :: 0.01
`26.1
`9.4
`
`
`
`
`
`nd
`0.3 :: 0.01
`34.1 :: 0.2
`1.6 :: 0.03
`nd
`13.6 :: 0.2
`
`29.3 :: 0.4
`16.0 :: 0.2
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`
`4.5 :: 0.02
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`
`0.8 :: 0.7
`48.0
`30.9
`
`
`
`2.2 :: 0.09
`0.4 :: 0.02
`26.8 :: 0.1
`1.8 :: 0.08
`0.2 :: 0.06
`1.6 :: 0.05
`
`5.7 :r: 0.03
`3.0 :: 0.02
`1.7 :r: 0.01
`0.1 :1: 0.05
`0.6 :r: 0.01
`2.4 :1: 0.01
`nd
`0.6 :r: 0.01
`nd
`1.3 :1: 0.02
`0.8 a: 0.01
`nd
`0.5 a: 0.01
`34.1 :: 0.07
`15.4 :: 0.1
`81.2
`9.9
`
`
`
`nd
`I’ld
`20.3 :: 0.6
`nd
`0.5 :: 0.4
`36.4 :: 0.02
`
`11.7 :r: 0.5
`21.2 :: 0.7
`1'10
`nd
`1.5 :r: 0.08
`nd
`2.5 :1: 0.07
`5.8 :r: 0.2
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`1’10
`57.2
`13.3
`
`18:1 (11'9)
`18:2 (rt—6)
`18:3(1’1'3)
`20:0
`20:1 (“'1 1)
`20:2 (n—6)
`20:3 (n—3)
`2024 (11-6)
`22:0
`22:1 (n—13)
`22:2 (n—6)
`24:0
`24:1 (n—9)
`20:5 (11-3)
`22:5 (n—3)
`2 saturated FAs
`E monounsaturated
`FAs
`Z PUFAs 29.5 54.5 21. 59.0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“ Results (n = 3) are expressed as mean :: SD. 5Percentage of the total peak
`area of FAs. Crid = not detected.
`
`000002
`
`AKER877ITC00740545
`
`000002
`
`

`

`6016
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`
`purified PC. Separation was made by a CP Sil 88 column [(88%
`cyanopropyl)—arylpolysiloxane, 100 m X 0.25 mm, 0.2 gm, Varian].
`Samples (1 ,LtL) were injected. Carrier gas was helium of high purity
`(99.999504). The injector and detector were set to 230 °C, and the column
`was set at 60 °C, held for 5 min. and raised to 165 CC (rate of 15 C’C/min).
`The temperature of 165 0C was held for 1 min and then raised to 225 °C
`(rate of2 C’C/min), The final temperature was maintained for 30 min. Peaks
`were identified by a comparison to standards (FAME mix C4—C24,
`Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Purified PC were trans—
`esterified using KOH (0.5 M) in CH3OH by vortexing for 2 min at room
`temperature. After decantation, FAME were extracted using n—heptane.
`Gas chromatography (GC) data were normalized, and the percentage of
`each FA was calculated as follows:
`
`% :A(peak(m/z)) X 100
`Z A(peaks)
`
`where A(peak) refers to the area of each identified peak and 2,4(peaks)
`refers to the sum of areas of each identified peak. Each analysis was
`
`performed in triplicate. All results are expressed as mean 3: SD.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Purification of PC. PC was separated from non—polar lipids and
`other PLs using either flash chromatography or preparative
`HPLC. While flash chromatography was fast and easy, it was
`ineffective with food samples containing phosphatidylserine or
`sphingomyeline. Preparative HPLC on the other hand allowed
`for the isolation of PC from such samples as ox liver for instance,
`which contained both of these PLs. After each chromatographic
`
`Le Grandois et al.
`
`
`step, fractions containing PC were pooled and purity was checked
`
`
`by HPLC—evaporative light—scattering detector (ELS )). Purity
`levels for PC isolated from each food sample were as follows:
`98.7% for egg yolk, 98.0% for krill oil, 95.0% for soy, and 90.1%
`for ox liver. These levels were sufficient for the subsequent
`determinations of FA profiles and molecular species in PC
`samples.
`FA Profiles of Purified PC. Table 1 shows FA profiles of PC
`purified from the studied food matrices as determined from the
`normalized data of GC—FID analysis. Soy PC was naturally
`shown to contain higher proportions of unsaturated FA, as
`compared to PC from animal sources. For instance, 18:2
`(57.6%) and 18:3 (6.6%) were particularly abundant in soy PC.
`Some saturated FA, such as 22:0 (0.8%) and 24:0 (0.5%), were
`also present in soy PC, while they were not found in PC from egg
`yolk, ox liver, and krill oil. Conversely, 20:4 was identified in egg
`yolk PC (4.5%) and 0x liver PC (5.8%), while it was not detected
`in soy PC.
`As far as egg yolk PC is concerned, 16:0 (34.1%) and 18:1
`(29.3%) were the two main FA identified, followed by 18:2
`(16.0%) and 18:0 (13.6%) (Table 1), which is in agreement with
`a previous report (14). The same :As were predominant in ox
`liver but at different levels: 18:0 (36.4%), 18:2 (21.2%), 16:0
`(20.3%), and 18:1 (11.7%). Minor 7A were 20:1 (1.5%) and 20:3
`(2.5%) in ox liver and 16:1 (1.6%) and DHA (0.8%) in egg yolk.
`
`Krill oil PC contained the largest variety of FAs in comparison
`
`
`to other matrices but with *PA (34.1%), 16:0 (26.8%), and DHA
`(16.4%) being the three major FAs. This result is in accordance
`
`
`
`MCounts
`
`MCounts
`
`150 d
`
`125 <
`
`100 ~
`
`75 ,
`
`MCou ts
`
`5
`
`10
`
`25
`
`20
`1 5
`Retention time (min)
`h
`
`MCounts
`
`5
`
`20
`is
`1b
`Retention time (min)
`
`11
`
`25
`
`(D)
`
`
`
`
`50‘
`
`
`
`
` 5
`
`20
`1‘5
`1'0
`Retention time (min)
`
`2’5
`
`U'H
`
`16
`
`£0
`-k
`Retention time (min)
`
`£5
`
`Figure 1. Chromatograms of purified PC: (A) soy, (B) ox liver, (C) egg yolk, and (D) krill oil using LC—ESl—MS. Separation was performed using isocratic
`conditions: CHSCN/CHSOH (40:60) containing 0.1% NH4OH at a flow rate of 1 mL/min onto a reverse-phase column (250 >< 3 mm, 3pm). Letters are assigned
`to major identified peaks: a, 18:3—18:3-PC; b, 18:3—18:2—PC; c, 18:2—18:2-PC; d, 15:0—18:3-PC; e, 18:1—18:2-PC; f, 16:0—18:2—PC; g, 16:0—18:1-PC; h,
`18:0—18:2-PC + 18:1—18:1-PC; i, 18:0—18:1-PC;j, 18:0—20:4—PC; k, 18:0—20:3-PC; I, 18:1—20:4—PC; m, 18:2—20:3-PC; n, 16:0—20:5-PC;0, 15:0—18:0-
`PC; p, 16:0—22:6-PC; q, 18:1—22:6-PC; r, 18:0—22:6-PC; s, 14:0—20:5-PC; t, 20:5—20:5—PC; u, 20:5—22:6-PC; v, 22:6—22:6-PC; w, 18:1—20:5-PC; x,
`18:0—20:5-PC; and y, 18:1—20:4—PC.
`
`000003
`
`AKER877ITCOO740546
`
`000003
`
`

`

`100%
`
`a
`0, 754,
`QC
`CU
`UC
`:1
`
`g 50%
`Q)
`.2
`
`25%
`
`E E
`
`0%
`
`100%
`
`75%
`
`50%
`
`25%
`
`0%
`
`(D
`
`(g
`'UC
`
`3 g
`
`E.5
`.9(D
`o:
`
`100%
`
`.,
`75%,
`

`g
`‘3
`g 500/
`3

`(3
`E 25%
`
`0%
`
`Article
`
`with a previous study showing that these three FAs were very
`abundant in krill oil (15), including krill PC (14). Saito et al. showed
`
`that, even if krill FA composition varied according to the period of
`
`
`capture, its PC was always rich in *PA, DHA, and 16:0 (16).
`The relative rates of saturated, monounsaturated, and PUFAs
`were very different among food matrices (Table l). PUFAs were
`most abundant in soy PC (64.5%) and in krill oil PC (59.0%) but
`with the latter containing far higher amounts of LC—PUFAs,
`namely, EPA and DHA, which is in line with the usual composi—
`tion of food products from marine sources (1). Saturated FAs on
`the other hand were predominant in animal source foods: 31.2%
`in krill oil PC, 48.0% in egg yolk PC, and 57.2% in ox liver PC.
`These data on FA distribution profiles in purified PC were later
`used in a comparative analysis of the molecular species determi—
`nations to check if the identified structures in each PC matched its
`
`determined FA composition.
`PC Molecular Species. Chromatographic Separation. Separa—
`tion was achieved using a 3 ,am column, and MS chromatograms are
`given in Figure 1. With less than 10 chromatographic peaks, soy PC
`(Figure 1A) and egg yolk PC (Figure 1C) had a simple composition
`compared to ox liver PC (Figure 1B) and krill PC (Figure 1D), which
`showed at least 15 peaks. Judging by the retention times, the same
`molecular species could be present in different foods. it is particu—
`larly true for the animal som‘ce ones: egg yolk and ox liver, where
`several peaks have the same retention times.
`Identification ofPC Jilolecular Species. Molecular species of
`PC were detected as m/: of lithium adducts [M + Li] T. Lithium
`was added to the chromatographic mobile phase and was shown
`not to interfere with the separation, which allowed for the
`combination of an effective chromatographic separation and an
`improved structural identification. Lithium has already been used
`in previous studies to identify molecular species of PC but with no
`chromatographic separation beforehand (I 7—I 9). To identify PC
`molecular species lithium adducts were fragmented in l\/'S2,
`which was previously shown to yield three main fragments:
`[Mei — FA]T corresponding to the loss of 21 FA group, [MLi —
`
`FA ai]T corresponding to the loss of a lithium salt of an :A
`group, and [MLi — TMA — FA]T corresponding to the loss of a
`trimethylamine group (TMA, 59 Da) and a FA group (I 7). The
`obtained fragmentation patterns of lithium adducts proved in fact
`to be effective in identifying various PC species,
`including
`symmetrical, asymmetrical, saturated, and unsaturated ones (17).
`The identification performed in this study did not take into
`account the position of the FA in the glycerol moiety and was
`in most cases tentative.
`
`
`
`
`
`Representative MS2 fragmentation spectra of the molecular
`species of PC are presented in Figure 2.
`Figure 2a shows the MS2 spectrum of the species m/z 764
`(RT = 13.2 min). One of its two FAs was identified as 16:0 based
`on m/z 449 and 502 ,which correspond respectively to fragments
`[M i— (16: 0)— TMA]T and [MLi — (16:0)Li]T. The second FA
`was identified as 18:2 based on m/: 484, which corresponds to
`fragment [MLi— (18:2)]T. An additional fragment, m/: 575,
`matched the mass of the PC minus its phosphocholine head with
`a lithium adduct (17). Consequently, the molecule detected as a
`lithium adduct with m/z 764 (RT : 13.2 min) was identified as
`[(16:0—18:2)PC + L1]T.
`Figure 2b shows the MS2 fragmentation spectrum of the
`molecular species m/z 812 (RT—— 8 6 min) which was identified
`as [(16:0—22:6)PC + Li] The two ions obtained m/z 478 and
`
`556, corresponded in fact1espectively to fragments [M Li— (22:6)—
`
`
`
`
`i]T and [MLi — (16:0)]T, showing )HA and 16:0 as the two
`
`«As of the molecule.
`
`A third example is given in Figure 2c with the MS2 spectrum of
`m/: 784 (RT : 6.0 min) containing three fragments that allowed
`
`200
`
`400
`m/z
`
`600
`
`Ions obtained in positive mode in ESI—MS2 between 200 and
`Figure 2.
`600 from fragmentation of lithiated adducts: (a) fragmentation of m/z 764,
`(b) fragmentation of m/z 812, and (c) fragmentation of m/z 784 and their
`corresponding structures.
`
`
`
`for its identification as [(18:3—18:3)PC+ Li]T. Two of these
`fragments, m/z 506 and 447, were identified as [MLi—(18:3)]T
`and [MLi— TMA — (18. 3)]T, which pointed to 18. 3 as the sole
`3A. The third f1agrnent, m/z 595 corresponded as above fo1m/z
`575, to the loss of the phosphocholine head with a lithium adduct.
`"his approach was applied to each m/z detected with purified PC
`samples and allowed for the identification of the constitutive
`molecular species for each food investigated.
`PC Molecular Species Profiles. Table 2 gives the relative
`distributions of the various PC molecular species in the foods
`investigated. As far as soy PC is concerned, the major species was
`
`000004
`
`AKER877ITCOO740547
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`449
`
`6017
`
`(a) [39/2 764
`
`I
`”1K
`
`200
`
`400
`m/z
`
`600
`
`(b) m/z872
`
`
`
`
`
`200
`
`
`
`(cjm/Z 734
`
`600
`
`595
`
`400
`17712
`
`Yr
`1
`
`1<
`
`5‘76
`
`447
`
`000004
`
`

`

`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`6018
`
`
`
`able 2. Molecular Species Profiles of Each Purified PCa
`
`m/z [M + Li]
`structure"
`retention time (min)
`soy PC (%)C
`egg yolk PC (”/Q)C
`krill all PC (%)C
`ox liver PC (”/Q)C
`
`Le Grandois et al.
`
`738.6
`740.6
`758.6
`
`762.6
`764.6
`
`(16:0—16:1)PC
`(16:0—16:0)PC
`(14:0—20:5)PC
`(14:1 —20:4)PC
`(16:0—18:3)PC
`(16:0—18:2)PC
`(16:1—18:1)PC
`
`11.5
`17.4
`6.5
`6.0
`10.4
`13.2
`13.6
`
`ndd
`0.9 3: 0.2
`nd
`nd
`2.8 : 0.4
`20.8 : 10
`nd
`
`768.6
`778.6
`780.6
`784.6
`
`786.6
`
`788.6
`
`790.6
`
`792.6
`
`794.6
`812.6
`
`814.6
`
`816.6
`
`818.6
`
`832.6
`836.6
`838.6
`840.6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`20.2 : 0.7
`nd
`
`
`
`
`
`2.7 3: 0.1
`ml
`3.2 :: 0.0
`nd
`nd
`2.6 : 0.0
`1.1 :: 0.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`nd
`0.7 :: 0.0
`rid
`0.2 :: 0.0
`nd
`10.9 :0 2
`ml
`
`
`
`nd
`0.7 :: 0 3
`0.9 : 0.0
`0 2 :: 0.0
`nd
`nd
`nd
`0.3 :: 0 0
`3.3 2:03
`nd
`3.5 :: 0.4
`2.8 :: 0.4
`34.3 :05
`00
`15 9:05
`ml
`0.4 : 0 0
`nd
`nd
`1 5:: 0.5
`1.2 :: 0.7
`5.7 : 0 3
`
`
`
`nd
`4 5:: 0.1
`nd
`17.5
`(16:0—18:0)PC
`nd
`nd
`nd
`15.5
`(17:0—18:2)PC
`ml
`nd
`nd
`20.9
`(17:0—18:1)PC
`nd
`nd
`0.7 3: 0.2
`6.0
`(18:3—18:3)PC
`1 4 3: 0.0
`nd
`nd
`5.8
`(14:0—22:6)PC
`1 33: 0.3
`nd
`nd
`6.5
`(16:1—20:5)PC
`nc
`nd
`7.7 3: 1 2
`8.6
`(18:2—18:3)PC
`32.4 3: 0.3
`nd
`nd
`8.1
`(16:0—20:5)PC
`1.0 3: 0.1
`3.3 3: 0 2
`34.0 3: 2.0
`11.0
`18:2—18:2)PC
`4.1 3: 0.1
`nd
`nd
`8.7
`16:0—20:4)PC
`1.0 :i: 0.1
`3.1 :i: 0.3
`16.3102
`13.3
`18:1—18:2)PC
`4.1 3: 0.1
`nd
`nd
`12.6
`16:0—20:3)PC
`6 63:0 9
`8.3 3: 0.7
`6.3 3: 0.3
`18.7
`18:0—18:2)PC
`nd
`333: 0.7
`3.2:: 0.4
`17.8
`18:1—18:1)PC
`ml
`8.9 3: 0.5
`1.6 3: 0.2
`22.4
`18:0—18:1)PC
`11.9 : 0.0
`2.8 : 0.1
`ml
`8.6
`16:0—22:6)PC
`nd
`nd
`nd
`8.2
`18:2—20:4)PC
`7.4 : 0.4
`nd
`nd
`7.5
`18:1 —20:5)PC
`1.3 : 0.4
`nd
`nd
`9.1
`18:0—20:5)PC
`1.9 :01
`I'lCl
`I'lEl
`9.7
`18:1—20:41PC
`ml
`nd
`nd
`10.8
`(18:2—20:3)PC
`
`ml
`4 5 :: 0.3
`ml
`15.5
`18:0—20:4)PC
`nd
`nd
`nd
`15.7
`(18:1—20:3)PC
`nc
`nd
`nd
`16.0
`(18:0—20:3)PC
`nd
`nd
`nd
`16.4
`(18:2—20:1)PC
`nd
`1.7 3: 0.0
`nd
`nd
`4.4
`(20:5—20:5)PC
`0.1 :: 0 1
`nd
`nd
`nd
`9.4
`(20:4—20:4)PC
`nd
`nd
`0 3 3: 0.6
`nd
`8.9
`(18:1—22:6)PC
`
`nd
`1 3: 0.1
`1 3: 0.3
`1
`nd
`12.0
`(18:0—22:6)PC
`0.8 :: 0 0
`nd
`nd
`nd
`13.2
`(20:3—20:3)PC
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`8.2
`(20:1 —20:5)PC
`2.21:: 0.2
`ml
`nd
`nd
`15.2
`(20:4—20:1)PC
`842.6
`nd
`2.3 3: 0.0
`nd
`nd
`4.6
`(20:5—22:6)PC
`858.6
`
`was
`(ac—acwc
`so
`m
`nd
`08:00
`m
`
`a Results (n = 3) are expressed as mean :: SD. bThe position of fatty acids in the glycerol moiety has not been determined. CPercentages of all identified molecular species.
`dnd = not detected.
`
`
`
`5.5 :: 0 2
`
`(18:2—18:2)PC (34.0%), followed by (16:0—18:2)PC (20.8%) and
`(18:1—18:2)PC (16.3%), while minor ones included (18:0—18:2)—
`PC (3.2%), (16:0—18:3)PC (2.8%), (18:0—18:1)PC (1.6%), and
`(18:3—18:3)PC (0.7%). Similar patterns have already been re—
`ported for soy PC (20 —22). Species determination data for soy PC
`is in agreement with its FA profile (Table l), with high amounts of
`16:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2, and 18:3 and 18:2 being by far the
`predominant one.
`The major molecular species in egg yolk PC was identified as
`(16:0—18:1)PC (39.7%), followed by (16:0—18:2)PC (20.2%),
`(18:0—18:2)PC (8.9%), and (1 820—1 8:1)PC (8.3%). Minor species
`included (l8:2—l8:2)PC (3.3%), (18:1—l8:2)PC (3.1%), (16:0—
`22:6)PC (2.8%), and (18:0—22:6)PC (1.1%). The data reported
`here for egg yolk are to a certain extent in agreement with a
`previous report by Pacetti et al. (14), essentially showing a similar
`pattern and (16:0—18:1)PC as the predominant species. Some
`quantitative differences that were observed, especially with minor
`molecular species, may be attributed to differences in hens’ diet,
`which affects FA composition. On the basis of the PC molecular
`species, 16:0 is the most abundant FA, being part of two species
`
`that accounted for ca. 60% of all species. This is in accordance
`with the FA profile of egg yolk PC, which showed that 16:0
`represented 34.1% of the total FA content (Table 1). To a lesser
`extent, a similar observation was made for 18: l.
`The four main molecular species in ox liver were the same as in
`the other animal source food, egg yolk, albeit
`in different
`proportions: (18:0—18:2)PC (34.3%), (18:0—18:1)PC (15.9%),
`(16:0—18:2)PC (10.9%), and (16:0—18:1)PC (9.1%). This
`matched the FA pattern, which showed 18:0 (364%), 18:2
`(21.2%), 16:0 (203%), and 18:1 (11.7%) as the dominant FAs
`in ox liver (Table 1). Bovine liver PC molecular species have been
`determined by Bang et al. (20) and Dobson et al. (23). With a
`content of21.59%, (18:0—21:3)PC was found by Bang et al. to be
`the major molecular species. What is striking about this identi—
`fication is that 21:3, which was not present in our determinations,
`is an extremely rare FA. Dobson et al. on the other hand showed a
`pattern much closer to our findings, with (18:0—18:2)PC, (18:0—
`18:1)PC, and (16:0—18:1)PC being the main species and no
`(18:0—21:3)PC being detected (23). These remarks let us think
`that the identification performed by Bang et al.
`is probably
`
`000005
`
`AKER877ITC00740548
`
`000005
`
`

`

`Article
`
`wrong. Minor species found in ox liver included (18:0—20z3)—
`PC + (18:2—20:1)PC (5.5%), (18:0—20:4)PC + (18:1—20:3)PC
`(57%),
`(18:1—18:2)PC (35%),
`(16:0—20:4)PC (3.3%), and
`(16:0—20:3)PC (2.8%) and were essentially the same as those
`identified in other studies. Some few differences observed with
`
`minor molecular species could be ascribed to the animal origin
`and diet, which affect the FA content (14). For molecular species
`that could not be adequately separated by chromatography, e.g.,
`(18:0—20:3)PC and (18:2—20:1)PC, the calculated content took
`the two structures into account (Table 2).
`As far as kn'll oil is concerned, to our knowledge, this is the first
`time the identification of PL molecular species is investigated,
`although FA profiles have already been determined for phospha—
`tidylethanolamine, PC, and TAG in krill (Euphazrsiapaczfica) (16).
`The major PC molecular species was determined as (16:0—20:5)—
`PC and represented 32.4% of all PC. Other species, such as
`(16:0—22:6)PC (11.9%), (18:1—20:5)PC (7.4%), (18:0—18:2)PC
`(6.6%), (16:0—18:1)PC (5.9%), and (l6:0—20:4)PC (4.1%), were
`less abundant. Once again, the patterns of molecular species and
`
`7A coincided, because both determinations indicated that EPA,
`
`)HA, and 16:0 were the predominant FAs. Interestingly, minor
`molecular species of krill oil PC included two [(14:0—20:5)PC
`(32%) and (14:0—22:6)PC (14%)] with 14:0, the presence of
`which is a common feature of marine oils.
`
`In this study, an effective method of separation and identifica—
`tion of PC molecular species was reported. This method used
`lithium formate to form lithiated adducts. MS2 fragmentation of
`these adducts allowed for the identification of FA linked to the
`
`glycerol backbone of PC molecular species. As an example of
`application, the relative contents of individual molecular species
`were determined, which allowed for a sound comparison of PC
`structures from foods of plant, animal, and marine origins,
`represented by soy, ox liver, egg yolk, and krill oil. Soy lecithin,
`mainly made of PC and already in use as a food additive and a
`nutritional complement, was therefore shown to be highly rich in
`essential FAs but not in their LC—PUFA metabolites. Krill oil PC
`
`showed an opposite pattern in comparison to soy PC, with very
`
`
`low amounts of 18:2 or 18:3 detected (< 5%) but with 4PA and
`DHA being the most abundant among the foods tested ( > 50%).
`This study developed is an interesting contribution to the in—
`vestigation of new sources rich in LC—PUFA—PLs. As an
`
`example, krill oil was shown as a potential source for food
`
`
`supplementation with *PA and DHA.
`
`ABBREVIATIONS USED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`long—chain polyunsaturated fatty acid; PA or
`LC—PUFA,
`20:5 (n—3), eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA or 22:6 (n—3), docosahex—
`aenoic acid; PL, phospholipid; PUFA—PL, PUFA—rich PL; PC,
`
`ohosphatidylcholine; TAG, triacylglycerol; LC, liquid chroma—
`
`tography; *SI, electrospray ionization; MS, mass spectrometry;
`<LSD, eve porative light—scattering detector; GC, gas chroma—
`tography;
`:ID, flame ionization detector; 14:0, myristic acid;
`16:0, palmitic acid; 16:1 (n—7), palmitoleic acid; 17:0, heptadeca—
`noic acid; 18:0, stearic acid; 18:1 (n—9), oleic acid; 18:2 (n—6),
`linoleic acid; 18:3 (n—3), ot—linolenic acid, 20:1 (n—ll), gadoleic
`acid; 20:3 (n—3), dihomo—y—linolenic acid; 20:4 (n—6), arachidonic
`acid; 22:0, behenic acid; 24:0, lignoceric acid.
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem, Vol. 57, No. 14, 2009
`
`6019
`
`(3) Amate, L.; Gil, A.; Ramirez, M. Feeding infant piglets formula with
`long—chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as triacylglycerols or phos—
`pholipids influences the distribution of these fatty acids in plasma
`lipoprotein fractions. J. Nutr. 2001, 13/, 1250—1255.
`(4) Heinemann, K. M.; Waldron, M. K.; Bigley, K. E.; Lees, G. E.;
`Bauer, J. E. Long—chain (n—3) polyunsaturated fatty acids are more
`efficient than d—linolenic acid in improving electroretinogram re—
`sponses ofpuppies exposed during gestation, lactation, and weaning.
`J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1960—1966.
`(5) Horrocks, L. A.; Yeo Young, K. Health benefits of docosahexaenoic
`acid (DHA). Pliarmacal. Res. 1999, 40, 21 1—225.
`(6) Auestad, N.; Montalto, M. 3.; Hall, R. T.; Fitzgerald, K. M.; Wheeler,
`R. E; Connor, W. E; Neuringer, M.; Connor, S. L.; Taylor, J. A.;
`Hartmann, E. E. Visual acuity, erythrocyte fatty acid composition, and
`growth in term infants fed formulas with long chain polyunsaturated
`fatty acids for one year. Pediair. Res. 1997, 41, 1—10.
`(7) Innis, S. M.; Nelson, C. M.; Lwanga, D.; Rioux, F. M.; Waslen, P.
`Feeding formula without arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid has
`no effect on preferential looking acuity or recognition memory in healthy
`full—term infants at 9 mo of age. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996, 64, 40—46.
`(8) Makrides, M.; Simmer, K.; Goggin, M.; Gibson, R. A. Erythrocyte
`docosahexaenoic acid correlates with the visual response of healthy,
`term infants. Pediatr. Res. 1993, 33, 425—427.
`(9) Parmentier, M.; Sayed Mahmoud, C.; Linder, M.; Fanni, J. Polar
`lipids: n—3 PUFA carriers for membranes and brain: Nutritional
`interest and emerging processes. OCL 2007, [4, 224—229.
`(10) Lemaitre—Delaunay, D.; Pachiaudi, C.; Laville, M.; Pousin, J.;
`Armstrong, M.; Lagarde, M. B

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket