throbber
Page 1 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`Kcnyon&.Ken.y<m LLP
`!.’\!'TlZl.l‘.ECTTUr\l. PKOPIERTY LA“?
`
`LIBRARE?
`
`Advanced organic chemistry
`
`Carey & Snndberg - 3d
`ed., 1990
`A
`
`CHEM
`
`QD
`
`25 1 . 3
`. C37
`1 9 9 0
`

`
`,
`
`
`
`......,..,_._VE71\,.._wW.A
`
`
`
`a-v.»~a.««m;««A-g«a»..«AP.w...»...w-....“,..».‘W.,«m.,......,,,...........~m.a.v.nw«~u:~§4..E;;§..—..m«»»m«“..“.W«».%.,,,_.._.;.AA4*.....»euw,».uJ,,.,§4,,F‘_A_MW.-m»«.«.u.\.(.\....e-.Man--».,__..,,____‘,
`
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 2 of 84
`
`Page 2 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`51%,
`
`,
`
`.
`
`%g $%£’%§ I
`
`EV
`
`*1 9
`
`Advanced Organic
`Chemlstry
`
`Part A Structure and Mechamsms
`
`mjxhrafl
`‘mmgtgguyonl
`mg 1‘ 3 ‘2‘r.'s\‘§
`EESEWED
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 3 of 84
`
`Page 3 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`Advanced Organic Chemistry
`
`
`
`PART A: Structure and Mechanisms
`PART B: Reactions and Synthesis
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 4 of 84
`
`Page 4 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`Advanced Organic
`EDITION
`
`THIRD
`
`Part A: Structure and Mechanisms
`
`FRANCIS A. CAREY
`and RICHARD J. SUNDBERG
`
`L'?:i‘),€K$‘l7jl of Vizginia
`Charfottesville, Virginia
`
`PLENUM PRESS 0 NEW YORK
`
`LONDON
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 5 of 84
`
`Page 5 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`V
`
`,,
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Pubiication Data
`
`(Revised For 3rd ed.)
`Carcy. Francis A.. 1937-
`Advanced organic chemistry.
`lnciudes bibliographical references.
`Contents: pl. A. Structure and mechanisms—pt. B. Rea:-tiens and synthesis.
`1. Chemistry, Organic. I. Sundberg, Richard J.. 3938-
`. E. '1'Elle.
`QDZSI .2.C36
`£990
`54?
`ISBN 0-306-43440-7 (Part A)
`ISBN (1-306—43447—4 (pbk: Part A)
`ISBN 0-306-434566 (Part 3)
`ISBN 0-306-43457-1 (pbk.; Part B}
`
`90-6851
`
`109876
`
`@1996. £983, 19?? Plenum Press, New York
`A Diyision of Plenum Publishing Corporation
`233 Spring Street, New Yofic, N.Y. 300:3
`
`All rights reserved
`
`No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrievai system, or transmitted
`in my form :3: by any mcans, electronic. mechanical, photocopying. microfilming.
`recording, or omerwisc. withouz written permissian from the Publisher
`Printed in Hz: Urzized Staxes of America
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 6 of 84
`
`Page 6 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`12
`
`Free-Radical Reactions
`
`12.}. Generation and Characterization of Free Radicals
`
`12.1.1. Background
`
`A free-radical reaction is a chemical process in which molecules having unpaired
`electrons are involved. The radical species could be a starting compound or a
`product, but in organic chemistry the most common cases are reactions that involve
`radicals as intermediates. Most of the reactions discussed to this point have been
`heterolytic processes involving polar intermediates and/or transition states in which
`all eiectrons remained paired throughout the course of the reaction. In radical
`reactions, homolyzic bond cleavages occur. The generalized reactions shown below
`illustrate the formation of alkyl, vinyl, and aryl free radicals by hypotheticai
`homolytic processes.
`
`Y» + R,c—:‘-x —» 12,0 + x—v
`
`if
`R;C=C'¥< --o R;€.—..C?/
`' x
`
`R
`
`4“ x.
`
`~
`
`z~ »~ Q +
`
`The idea that substituted carbon atoms with seven valence electrons could be
`
`involved in organic reactions took firm hold in the 1930s.'1'wo experimental studies
`have special historical significance in the development of the concept of free-radical
`reactions. The work of Gomberg around 1900 provided evidence that when triphenyl-
`651
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 7 of 84
`
`Page 7 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`methyl chloride was treated with silver metal, the resulting solution contained P1-LSC.
`in equilibrium with a less reactive molecule. It was originally thought that the mate
`stable molecule was hexaphenyietliane, but eventually this was shown not to be SO_
`The dimerie product is actually 3 cyclohexadiene derivative.‘
`
`rrnnr: # zphsg
`
`H l
`
`,
`
`’
`
`Pl!
`
`Pb
`
`The dissociation constant is small, only about 2 x 10"‘ M at room temperature. T113
`presence of the small amount of the radical at equilibrium was deduced from
`observation of reactions that could not be reasonably attributed to a normal hydro-
`carbon.
`
`The second set of experiments was carried out in 1929 by Paneth. The decompo-
`sition of tetramethyllead was carried out in such a way that the decomposition
`products were carried by a flow of inert gas over a film of lead metal. The lead was
`observed to disappear, with re-formation of tetramethyilead. The conclusion was
`reached that methyl radicals must exist long enough in the gas phase to be transported
`from the point of decomposition to the lead film.
`
`Pblcflal-no 21:5 Pbm ‘l’ 4CH3'rg>
`
`4CH3‘u> "’ Pbm
`
`Pb(CH3)€e.;
`
`Since these early experiments, a great deal of additional information about the
`existence and properties of free-radical intermediates has been developed. In this
`chapter, we will discuss the structure of free radicals and some of the special
`properties associated with free radicals. We will also discuss some nfthe key chemical
`reactions in which free-radical intermediates are involved.
`
`12.1.2. Stable and Persistent Free Radicals
`
`Most organic free radicals have very short lifetimes, but various structural
`features enhance stability. Radicals without special stabilization rapidly dimerize
`or disproportionate. The usual disproportionation process involves transfer of a
`hydrogen from the carbon 13 to the radical site, leading to formation of an allcane
`and an alkenc.
`
`Dimeriznrion
`
`Disproportiomtrian
`
`2
`
`-
`
`-—> -
`
`i
`—C
`E
`I
`I
`2 —(II’.—? —-
`H
`
`I
`C
`I
`l
`~~—?—— '
`H
`
`1. H. Lankamp, W. Th. Nauta. and C. Mactean, Tetrahedron Leta, 2‘-$9 E1968}; 3. M. McBride.
`Tetrahedron 36, 2069 (1974); K. J. Skinner, H. S. Hochcster, and I. M. McBride, J’. Am. Chem Soc.
`96, 4301 { 191%).
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 8 of 84
`
`Page 8 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`' 652
`cnmsn 12
`gRgg_gAmc;.;_
`“E"CT‘°”5
`
`methyl chloride was treated with silver metal, the resulting solution contained Ph3C_
`in equilibrium with a less reactive molecule. It was originally thought that the more
`.
`stable molecule was hexaaplrenylethane, but eventually this was shown not to be SO_
`The dimertc product is actually a cyclohexadicne derivative.‘
`
`
`
`7
`
`‘—
`
`79??
`
`Ph
`
`“MC 7:: 2 Prue;
`
`H
`

`
`The dissociation constant is small, only about 2 X 10" M at room temperature. T113
`presence of the small amount of the radical at equilibrium was deduced from
`observation of reactions that could not be reasonably attributed to a normal hydro-
`carbon.
`
`The second set ofexperiments was carried out in 1929 by Paneth. The decompo-
`sition of tetrarnethyllead was carried out in such a way that the decomposition
`products were carried by a flow of inert gas over a film of lead metal. The lead was
`observed to disappear, with re-formation of tetrametlzyllead. The conclusion was
`reached that methyl radicals must exist long enough in the gas phase to betransponed
`from the point of decomposition to the lead film.
`450°C
`Pb(CH334m """ Pbm "' 4CH3'ss)
`
`4cH3-.,, + m, ‘flit P‘n(CH3);,,,
`
`Since these early experiments, a great deal of additional information about the
`
`existence and properties of free-radical intermediates has been developed. In this
`chapter, we will discuss the structure of free radicals and some of the special
`properties associated with free radicals. We will also discuss some of the key chemical
`reactions in which free-radical intermediates are involved.
`
`12.1.2. Stable and Persistent Free Radicals
`
`Most organic free radicals have very short lifetimes, but various structural
`features enhance stability. Radicals without special stabilization rapidly dlmerize
`or disproportionate. The usual disproportionation process involves transfer of a
`hydrogen from the carbon 5 to the radical site, leading to formation of an alkane
`and an allcene.
`
`Dimerizarlbn
`
`Dfspmpnrfionefion
`
`l
`i
`l
`2 ——(."I* -+ —Cl3—(E-
`I
`E
`'\
`2 -(lj—_[%‘- -+ M?-$— /)C=§;:k
`1!:
`M
`H H
`l
`‘
`
`1. H. Lankamp, W. Th. Naura, and C. Maclxan, Telrahedmn Lem, 249 (1968); J. M. McBride.
`‘Tetrahedron 30, 2009 (3.914); K. J. Skinner, H. S. Hochcsler, and J. M. McBride, L Am. Chem. Soc-
`96, 4301 (1974).
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 9 of 84
`
`Page 9 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`..my
`
`553
`sscrzom :24,
`GENERATION AND
`CHARACTERIZATION
`OF FREE RADICALS
`
`
`
`uu»mmu,_;4¢;;».z,.....~..,_...»«~ea:.1;,..,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E3
`
`..
`l
`~.~:
`..
`
`-1’
`‘_l
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 10 of 84
`
`Radicals also rapidly abstract hydrogen or other atoms from many types of solvents,
`and most radicals are highly reactive toward oxygen.
`
`flydrogen atom abstraction
`
`Addition to oxygen
`
`E
`I
`.......C- + H_y _, __C__[.; + y.
`]
`3
`
`l
`—<i:-+02
`
`E
`—» —c—o-—o-
`
`A few free radicals are indefinitely stable. Entries 1, 4, and 6 in Scheme 12.1
`are examples. These molecules are just as stable under ordinary conditions of
`temperature and atmosphere as typical closed—shell molecules. Entry 2 is somewhat
`less stable to oxygen, although it can exist indefinitely in the absence of oxygen.
`The strectures shown in entries 1, 2, and élfll permit extensive delocalization of
`the unpaired electron into aromatic rings. These highly delocalized radicals show
`no tendency toward dimerization or disproportionation. Radicals that have long
`lifetimes and are resistant to dimerization or other routes for bimolecular self-
`annihilation are called stable free radicals. The term inert free radical has been
`
`suggested for species such as entry 4, which is unreactive under ordinary conditions
`and £5 thermally stable even at 300°C.’
`a significant
`Entry 3 in Scheme 12.1 has only allcyl substituents and yet
`lifetimes in the absence of oxygen. Tl1e£ris{t-butyl}methyl radical has an even longer
`lifetime, with a half-life of about 20 min at 25°C? The steric hindrance provided by
`the t—butyl substituents greatly retards the rates of dimerization and disproportion-
`ation of‘ these radicals. They remain highly reactive toward oxygen, however. The
`term persistent radicals is used to describe these species, since their extended lifetimes
`have more to do with kinetic factors than with inherent stability.“ Entry 5 is a
`sterically hindered perfluorinated radical, which is even more stable than similar
`allcyl radicals.
`There are only a few functional groups that contain an unpaired electron and
`yet are stable in a Wide variety of structural environrnems. The best example is the
`nitroxide group, and there are numerous specific nitroxide radicals which have been
`prepared and characterized.
`
`R\
`/::'g—<§='..——»
`R
`
`R\
`/fsl—{:}-
`
`R
`
`Many of these compounds are very stable under normal conditions, and heterolytic
`reactions can be carried out on other functional groups in the molecule without
`destroying the nitroxiée group.‘
`
`2. M. Ballester, Am Chem. Res. 13, 335 (1985).
`-
`DJ
`G. D. lvfendenhall, D. Griller, 5. Lindsay, T. T. Tidwell, and K. U. Ingeld, J’. Am. Chem. Soc. 96,
`2441 (1974).
`4. For a review of various types of persistent radicals, see D. Griller and K. U. ingold, Acc. Chem.
`Res. 9, 13 (1976).
`S. For reviews of the preparation, reactions, and uses of nitroxide radicals, see 3. F. W. Keane, Chem.
`Rev. 78, 3? (1978); L. J. Berliner (ed.), Spin-Labelling, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`654
`
`Scheme 12.1. Stahility of Some Free Radicals
`
`Conditions for stability
`Structure
`CHAFFER 12
`'
`'
`‘
`FREE-RADICAL
`REACTIONS
`
`Indefirzitcly stable as a solid, even in the presence of
`
`alt.
`
`2'’
`
`Ph
`P3:
`’
`'
`7 Q
`Pl?
`Ph
`
`93"
`
`Crystalline substance is not rapidly attacked by
`oxygen, although solutions are air sensitive; the
`compound is stable to high temperature in the
`absence of oxygen.
`
`3‘
`
`(CH3'}3C
`
`\é_C(CH3)3
`
`Stable in dilute solution {<l9"5 M) below --30"C in
`the abseece of oxygen, cm of 50 sec at 25°C.
`
`Stable in solution for days, ever; in the presence of
`air. Indcfinitely stable in solid state. Thermally
`stable up to 300°C.
`
`Stable to olcygcn; themzally stable to ?0°C.
`
`Stable to oxygen; stable to extended storage as a
`solid. Slowly decomposes in solution.
`
`/
`
`Stable to oxygen oven above 1eD“C.
`
`{CHa)aC
`.
`
`a. C. F. Koelsch. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 751, 4439:1957).
`h. K. Ziegler‘ and B. Schrscll, lustre: I.£»:$a:'gs Am. Chem. 445, 266 (l92S)_
`96, 244] (1974).
`c. G. D. Mendcnhall, D. (killer, D. Lindsay, T. ‘F. Tidwcl}. and K. UE Ingold, J. Am. Chem.
`d. M. Ballester, J. Riera. .l. (?::s:m‘%cr,.C. Basile, and J. M. Mo.-1:6, J. Am. Chem. Soc 93. 2215 (1971).
`6. IL Y. Scherer. Jr., T. Ono. K. Yamanouchl, R. Fernandez, and P.‘Henderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 718 ( 1985}.
`f. G. M» Coppingcr. J. Am. Chem Soc. 79, 513! §_£957); P. D. Beale}: andT. Funaliaslii, J. Am. Chem. SM. 84, 2595 (1962).
`g. A, K. Hoflmann and A. T, Hemtlersxm, I. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 4671 (196).
`
`K
`V’
`‘=
`
`v:
`3
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 11 of 84
`
`Page 11 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`Although the existence of the stable and persistent free radicals we have
`discussed is of significance in establishing that free radicals can have extended
`lifetimes, most free—radical reactions invoive highly reactive intermediates that have
`relatively fleeting lifetimes and can only he studied at very low concentrations. The
`techniques for study of radicals under these conditions are the subject of the next
`section.
`
`655
`
`SECTION 123,
`GE-NERATl0N mun
`cunnacremzpmon
`or FREE RADICALS
`
`12.1.3. Direct Detection of Radical Intermediates
`
`The distinguishing characteristic of free radicals is the presence of an unpaired
`electron. Species with an unpaired eiectron are said to be paramagnetic. The most
`useful method for detecting and characterizing uustabie radical intermediates is
`electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Electron spin resonance (ESR}
`spectroscopy is synonymous. This method of spectroscopy detects the transition of
`an electron between the energy levels associated with the two possible orientations
`of electron spin in a magnetic field. An EPR spectrometer records the absorption
`of energy when an electron is excited from the lower to the higher state. The energy
`separation is very small on an absolute seats and corresponds to the energy of
`microwaves. EPR spectroscopy is a highly specific tool for detecting radical species
`since only molecules with unpaired electrons give rise to EPR spectra. As with other
`spectroscopic methods, detailed analysis of the absorption spectrum can give rise
`to structural information. One feature that is determined is the g value, which
`
`specifies the separation of the two spin states as a function of the magnetic field
`strength of the spectrometer.
`
`ho: E =g;.oEH
`
`where #3 is a constant, the Bohr magnetron (=9.274 x 18"“ erg;’(}), and H is the
`magnetic field in gauss. The measured value of g is a characteristic of the particular
`type of radical, just as the line positions in IR and NMR spectra are characteristic
`of the absorbing species.
`A second type of structural information can be deduced from the hyperfine
`Splitting in EPR spectra. The origin of this line splitting is closely related to the
`factors that cause spin—spin splitting in proton NMR spectra. Certain nuclei have
`a magnetic moment. Those which are of particular interest in organic chemistry
`include ‘H, “C, “N, “F, and "P. Interaction of the unpaired electron with one or
`more of these nuclei splits the signal arising from the electron. The number of lines
`is given by the equation
`
`number of iines = Zn: + 1
`
`where I is the nuclear spin quantum number, and n is the number of equivalent
`interacting nuclei. For ‘H, “C, "F and “P, I =
`Thus, a single hydrogen splits a
`signal into a doublet. Interaction with three equivalent hydrogens, as in a methyl
`group, gives rise to splitting that produces four lines. This splitting is illustrated in
`Fig. 12.] . Nitrogen (“‘N), with I = 1, splits each energy level into three lines. Neither
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 12 of 84
`
`Page 12 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`656
`
`C’ HAFIER I2
`FREE-RA.D?.C.AL
`REACTIONS
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`,-a«an;ac...M-.......=..........w......
`
`
`
`No interacting
`hydrogen nucleus-
`one absorption
`line
`
`One interacting
`hydrogen nucleus—
`two absorption
`lines
`
`Two equivalent
`interacting
`hydrogen nuclei-
`xhree absorption
`lines
`
`Fig. l2.i. Hyperfine splitting in EPR spectra.
`
`“C not ‘50 has a nuclear magnetic moment, and just as they cause no splitting in
`NMR spectra, they have no efiect on the multiplicity in EPR spectra.
`
`A great deal of structural information can be obtained by analysis of the
`hyperfine splitting pattern of a free radical. If we Iimit our discussion for the moment
`to radicals without heteroatoms, the number of lines indicates the number of
`
`interacting hydrogens, and the magnitude of the splitting, given by the hyperfine
`splitting constant 5:, is a measure of the unpaired eiectrori density in the hydrogen
`h is orbital. For planar systems in which the unpaired electron resides in a rr-orbital
`system, the relationship between electron spin density and the splitting constant is
`given by the McConnell equation‘:
`
`a=:2Q
`
`where a is the hyperfine coupling constant for a proton, Q is a proportionality
`constant (about 23 G), and p is the spin density on the carbon to which the hydrogen
`is attached. For example, taking Q = 23.0 G, the hyperfine splitting in the benzene
`radical anion may be readily calculated by taking p = .33, since the one unpaired
`electron. must be distributed equally among the six carbon atoms. The calculated
`
`value of a = 3.83 is in good agreement with the observed value. The spectrum (Fig.
`Illa) consists of seven lines separated by a coupling constant of 3.75 G.
`The EPR spectrum of the ethyl radical presented in Fig. 12.2b is readily
`interpreted, and the results are of interest with respect to the distribution of unpaired
`electron density in the molecule. The 12-line spectrum is a triplet of quartets resulting
`from unequal coupling of the electron spin to the ac and [3 protons. The two coupling
`constants are a,,, = 22.38 G and a5 = 26.87 G and imply extensive delooalization of
`“spin density through the 0' bonds.
`EPR. spectra have been widely used in the study of reactions to detect free-radical
`intermediates. An interesting example involves the cyclopropylmethyl radical. Much
`
`6. H. M, McConnell, J. Chem. Phys. 24. 764 (1956).
`
`5
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 13 of 84
`
`Page 13 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`(all
`
`
`
`26.9Ci
`
`32.4 G
`
`657
`
`secrzow 12,1,
`GENERATION AND
`CHARACTERIZATION
`OF FREE RADICALS
`
`
`
`Fig. 122. Some EPR spectra of small organic free radicals: (3) Spectrum of thc bcnzem: radical anion.
`[From 1. R. Bolton, Mal‘. Phys. 6, 219 {I963}. Reproduced by permission of Taylor and Francis, Lid.)
`(I3) Specirum of the ethyl radrcal. fFrom R. W‘. Fcssenden and R. H. Schulcr, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 935
`(1960); 39, 2147 (1963); Reproduced by permission of the American Instituac of Physics.)
`
`chemical experience has indicated that this radical is unstable, givfing rise to 3—butenyl
`radical rapidly after being gcrrerated.
`
`>U~CH; ———»
`
`CH2‘
`|
`CH2
`
`CHTJCH2
`
`The radical was generated by photolytic decomposition of di—t-butyl peroxide in
`methylcyclopropane, a process that leads to selecfive abstraction of a methyl hydro»
`gen from mcthylcyclopropanc.
`
`(CH3}3C0OC(CH3)3 J1» 2(CH;}3C~—O-
`
`zCH31;C—<3’ + [>._cu, -—» [>~cH; + (CI-I;l;€.‘{)H
`
`Below —l‘40°C, the EPR spectrum observed was that of the cyclopropylmethyl
`radical. If {he photolysis was dons above 440°C, however, the spectrum of a second
`species was seen, and above —1€)0“C,
`this was the only spectrum observed. This
`spectrum could be shown to he that of the 3—butenyI radficalf This study also
`established that the 3-butenyl radical did not revert to the cyciopropylmethyl radical
`on being cooled back to —140"C. The conclusion is that the ring opening of the
`
`‘J. J. K. Kochi, X’. J. Krustic, and D. R. Baton. J.
`
`Cfzem. Soc 91, 187? (1969).
`
`;
`
`
`
`.mum-"3-lv_‘2<4V‘,r.,_V\»a.“7;;,.4x;x,.,
`
`M11-..
`
`
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 14 of 84
`
`Page 14 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`558
`M
`“BR L
`CI-{A ,
`-.
`7
`;RE5.gADlCAl..
`“ACTIONS
`
`cyclopropyl radical is a very facile process, so that the lifetime of the cyelopropyl
`radical above —I€l0"C is very short. The reversal ofthe ring opening can be detected
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`by isotopic labeling experiments, which reveal
`the occurrence of deuterium
`migration:
`
`CH2‘
`
`CH *“““CHCH2CD2‘ 1 HzC— D; %‘* CH2-“~'CHC‘i}2CH2I
`
`The rates of both the ring opening (Ic : 2 X 1l}‘s"‘ at 25°C) and the ring closure
`(k = 3 x 103 s‘“‘) have been measured and show that only a very small amount of
`the cyclopropylmethyl radical is present at equilibrium, in agreement with the EPR
`results.g
`
`It is important :0‘ emphasize that direct studies such as those carried out on
`the cyclopropylmethyl radical can be done with low steady-state concentrations of
`the radical. In the case of the study of the cyclopropylmethyl radical, removal of
`the source of irradiation would lead to rapid disappearance of the EPR spectrum,
`because the radicals would react rapidly and not be replaced by continuing radical
`formation. Under many conditions, the steady—state concentration of a radical
`intermediate may be too low to permit direct detection. Failure to observe an EPR
`signal therefore cannot be taken. as conclusive evidence against a radical inter-
`mediate.
`A technique called spin trapping can sometimes be used to study radicals in
`this circumstance. A diamaguetic molecule that has the property of reacting rapidly
`with radicals to give a stable paramagnetic species is introduced into the reaction
`system being studied. As radical intermediates are generated, they are trapped by
`the reactive molecule to give more stable, detectable radicals. The most useful spin
`traps are nitrosc compounds. They rapidly reactpwith radicals to give stable nitroxide
`radicals.’ Analysis of the EPR spectrum of the nitroxidc radical product can often
`provide information about the structure of the original radical.
`R
`
`12- + R.'N=O ——»
`
`face
`12*’ ”
`
`Another technique that is highly specific for radical processes is known as
`CIDNP, an abbreviation for chemically induced dynamic nucIear_poIarization.“' The
`instrumentation required for such studied is a normal NMR spectrometer. CIDNP
`is observed as a strong perturbation of the intensity of NMR signals for products
`formed in certain types of free-radical reactions. The variation in intensity results
`
`8. A. Eifiio, D. Gziller, K. U. lngold, A. I... J. Beckwith, and A. K. Serelis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 1734
`(1930); L. Mathew and J. Warkentin, J. Am. Chem. Sac. H18, 7981 (1986).
`9. E. G. Janzen, /lcc Chem’. Res. 4, 31 (1937:); E. G. lanzcn, in Free Radical: in Biology, W‘. A. Pryor
`(ea), Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, 198%), pp. ll5—l54.
`10. H. R. Ward, Acc. Chem. Res. 5, 18 (1972); R. G. Lawler, Acc. Chem. Res, 5, 25 (I972).
`
`-
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 15 of 84
`
`7:
`
`
`
`a l
`
`a*2fewfi
`l‘
`
`5
`
`“
`
`
`
`.._M,.7........................4,...1..eM-..:...._._
`
`j
`i
`
`Page 15 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`659
`
`.SECTlON 12.1.
`GENERATION AND
`CHIuRACTERlZATl0N
`OF FREE RADICALS
`
`.4
`
`4 .LA
`
`-T
`
`
`
`“%;7s=ssJt«_.lvwyr3—4#;r.,--so-f\«-j
`
`
`‘~:~‘*3-i.“=:S$s.'s-ei;—.<7~?“
`
` _..,....,.._A,,,._c,.V,...,_
`
`,
`
`LLI
`
`l
`
`
`
`BPO 0.05 M in cyclohexanone
`100 MHz 110°C
`
`l=l2min
`
`:==&min
`
`t=4min
`
`t=0
`
`Fig. 12.3- NMR spectra recorded during thermal decompo-
`sition of dibenzoyl peroxide. Singlet at high field is due to
`benzene; other signals are due to dibcnzoyl peroxide. [ From
`H. E-‘lseher and J. Bargon, Ace. Chem. Res. 2, 110 (1969).
`Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical
`Society]
`
`when the normal population of nuclear spin states dictated by the Boltzmann
`distribution is disturbed by the presence of an unpaired electron. The magnetic
`moment associated with an electron causes a. redistribution of the nuclear spin states.
`Individual nuclei can become overpopulated in either the lower or upper spin state.
`If the lower state is overpopulated, an enhancecl absorption signal is observed. If
`the upper state is overpopulated, an emission signal is observed. The CIDNP method
`is not as general as EPR spectroscopy because not all free-radical reactions can be
`expected to exhibit the phenomenon."
`Figure 12.3 shows the observation of CIDNP during the decomposition of
`dibenzoyl peroxide in cyelohexanone:
`
`ii
`‘i
`PhCOQCPh -—§ 2Ph» + 2C0;
`
`?h' + S-‘H —+ C6H5 + S-'
`
`The emission signal corresponding to benzene confirms ‘that it is formed by a
`free-radical process. As in steady-state EPR experiments, the enhanced emission
`and absorption are observed only as long as the reaction is proceeding. When the
`
`11. Ear a discussion of the theory of CHJNP and the conditions under which spin polarization occurs,
`see G. L. Class, Ado. Magn. Resen. ‘I, 157 (1974); R. Kaptein, Ads. Free Radical Chem. 5. 33 (19753;
`G. L. Class, R. J. Miller, and O. D. Redwine, Acc. Chem. Res. 18, 195 (2985).
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 16 of 84
`
`Page 16 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`reaction is complete or is stopped in some way, the signals rapidly return to their
`normal intensity, because the equilibrium population ofthc two spin states is rapidly
`reached.
`
`One aspect of both EPR and CIDNP studies that should be kept in mind is
`that either technique is capable of detecting very small amounts of radical intermedi-
`ates. This aspect makes both techniques quite sensitive but can also present a pitfall.
`The most prominant features of either EPR or CIDNP spectra may actually be due
`to radicals that account for only minor products of the {oral reaction process. An
`example ofthis was found in a CIDNP study of the decomposition of trichlorcacetyl
`peroxide in alkcnes:
`
`0 0
`ll
`,
`fl
`
`*3’ 2 Cl3C-
`
`'5' 2 CO2
`
`CI_~,C- + CH;-=C{CH132 -5 Cl_-,CCHgC(CH3)2
`
`CBC‘
`
`“F C13CCHsC(CH.-:32 “"* CECE 4' Cl3CCHg('T’=-"CH;
`CH3
`
`In addition to the emission signals of CHCI3 and Cl,CCl-l;C(CH3)=CI-"lg, which
`are the major products, a strong emission signal for Cl3CCI-ICI2 was identified.
`However, this compound is a very minor product of the reaction, and when the
`signals have returned to their normal intensity, Cl3CCHCl; is present in such a
`small amount that it cannot be detected.”
`
`12.1.4. Sources of Em Radicals
`
`There are several reactions that are quite commonly used as sources of free
`radicals, both for the study of radical structure and reactivity and also in synthetic
`processes. Some of the most general methods are outlined here. Examples of many
`of these will be encountered again when specific reactions are discussed. For the
`most part, we will defer discussion of the reactions of the radicals until then.
`
`Peroxides are a common source of radical intermediates. An advantage of the
`generation of radicals from peroxides is that reaction generally occurs at relatively
`low temperature. The oxygen-oxygen bond in peroxides is weak (~30 kcal/mol),
`and activation energies for radical formation are low. Diacyl peroxides are sources
`of alkyl radicals because the carboxyl radicals that are initially formed lose CO2
`very rapidly.” In the case of aroyl peroxides, products may be derived from the
`carboxyl radical or the radical formed by decarboxylation."
`
`12. H. Y. Loicen, R. G. Lawler, and H. R. \lls'ard, J". Org. Chem. 38, I06 (1973).
`I3. 1. C. Martin, J. W. Taylor, and E. H. Drew, J. Am Chem. Soc 89, 129 (1967); F. D. Greene, H. P.
`Stein, C,~C. Chu, and F. M. Vane, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 2080 (1954).
`I4. I). F. DcTar, K A. .1. Long, .1. Rendleman, 1. Bradley, and P.Dunca;r_. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89,4051 (1967).
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`Page 17 of 84
`
`
`
`»,........;..u......-3-:1
`
`660
`
`CHAPTER I2
`FREE-RADICAL
`REACTIGNS
`
`
`
`‘l.
`.3.
`
`
`
`‘“.r‘-‘r$:=s’.g;:§>e«r‘«.r.m«.«.w..:.s=A:.~::;:1:/..-<:;»we-'=n%?*i~:.3
`
`
`Page 17 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`661
`
`SECTION 12.1.
`GENERATION AND
`CHARACTERIZATION
`BF FREE RADICALS
`
`o
`0
`5:
`n
`I!
`.
`cnlcooccrg —i‘i'1°°—“—‘-> 2CH3CO-i —> 2C1-13- + zcoz
`
`o I
`
`ll
`.
`.1:
`rhi:oocph “i'—'E> 2PhC0* —» 29:1» + 2:20,,
`
`Alkyl hydroperoxides give alkoxy radicals and the hydroxyl radical. I-Butyl hydro-
`pcroxide is often used as a radical source. Detailed studies have been reported on
`the mechanism ofthe decomposition, which is a somewhat more complicated process
`than simple unimolecular decomposition.” Dialkyl peroxides decompose to give
`two allcoxy radicals.“
`
`gH,ooc,H5 3» 2C:I~I,0.
`
`Peroxyesters ere also sources ofradicals. The acyloxy portion normally loses carbon
`dioxide, so peroxyesters yield an alkyl (or aryl) and an alkoxy radical."
`
`0l
`
`l
`RCOOC{CH3)3 -> R: + C0; + -OC(CI-13);
`
`The decomposition of peroxides, which occurs thermally in the examples cited
`above, can also be readily accomplished by photochemical excitation. The alkyl
`hydroperoxides are also sometimes used in conjunction with a transition metal ion.
`Under these conditions, an alkoxy radical is produced, but the hydroxyl portion
`appears as hydroxide ion as a result of one-electron reduction by the metal ion.“
`
`{cH,),cooH + M“ ~+ (CH3)3C0- + “OH + M“
`
`The thermal decompositions described above are unimolecular reactions that
`should exhibit first-order kinetics. Under many conditions, peroxides decompose
`at rates faster than expected for unimolecular thermal decomposition, and with
`more complicated kinetics. This behavior is known as induced decomposition and
`occurs when part of the peroxide decomposition is the result ofbimolecular reactions
`with radicals present in solution, as illustrated specifically for diethyl peroxide:
`
`x- + cH,cH,oocH.<:u3 -+ CH,CHOOCH2CI-13 + I-l.--X
`CH3f;l-KOOCI-l2CH3, —» Cl-13CH=0 + AOCHECH,
`
`The amount of induced‘ decomposition that occurs depends on the concentration
`and reactivity of the radical intermediates and the susceptibility of the substrate to
`radical attack. The racial X» may be formed from the peroxide, but it can also be
`derived from subsequent reactions with the solvent. For this reason, both the structure
`
`15. R. Hiatt, 1‘. Mill, and F. R. Mayo, J. Org. Chem, 33, 1416 (1,968), and accompanying papers.
`1-4
`5. W. ‘A. Pryor, D. M. Huston, ‘l". R. Fiskc, T. L. Pickering, and E. Ciuifarin, J. Am. Chem. Soc: 86,
`423? (3964).
`1?. P. 9. Bartlett and R. R. I-liatt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1398 (1958).
`18. W. H. Richardson, I. Am. Chem. Soc. 8'3’, 247 (1965).
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`Page 18 of 84
`
`
`
`.“".3‘
`
`NO
`
`
`
`at"-<"mo‘*<om
`
`20:3’
`
`Page 18 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`
`
`.1
`
`lllEE
`
`5
`'
`
`.
`
`5
`
`I
`E
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`..............................,....-._.s-.....¢....._.....
`
`552
`
`§§;§:e.Ff).]éAL
`R5"°T’°NS
`
`of the peroxide and the nature of the reaction medium are important in determining
`the extent of induced decomposition relative to unimolecular homolysis.
`Another quite general source of free radicals is the decomposition of azo
`compounds. The products are molecular nitrogen and the radicals derived from the
`substituent groups.
`
`R—N=N——R'
`
`:19?
`
`is
`
`R’ + NEN + -R’
`
`Both symmetrical and unsymmetrical azo compounds can be made so 3. single radical
`or two different ones may be generated. The energy for the decomposition can be
`either thermal or photochemical.” In the thermal decomposition, it has been estab-
`lished that the temperature at which decomposition occurs depends on the nature
`of the substituent groups. Azomethane does not decompose to methyl radicals and
`nitrogen until temperatures above 400°C are reached. Azo compounds that generate‘
`relatively stable radicals decompose at much lower temperatures. Azo compounds
`derived from ally} groups decompose somewhat above 100°C, for example:
`
`cH3cH,cri,N=NcH,cH=ci-i, 3333* cH,cHZ<:H,» + N2 + CH,=CHCH,-
`
`Roi". 20
`
`Unsymmetrical azo compounds must be used to generate phenyl radicals because
`azobenzene is very stable thermally. Phenylazotriphenylrnethane decomposes readily
`because of the stability of the triphenylmethyl radical.
`
`PhN=NC(Ph)3 35» so + i>h,c- + N2
`
`Ref. 21
`
`Many azo compounds also generate radicals when photolyzed. This can occur
`by a thermal decomposition of the cis azo compounds that are formed in the
`photochemical step.” The cis isomers are thermally much more labile than the trans
`isomers.
`
`R
`
`/
`
`/rests‘
`
`—»
`
`R
`
`N.-:Es'
`
`\R
`
`R!’
`
`—» R,- N,
`
`-R
`
`N-Nitrosoanilides are an alternative source of aryl radicals. There is a close
`mechanistic relationship between this route and the decomposition of azo oom—
`pounds. The N-nitrosoanilides rearrange to an intermediate with a nitrogen-nitrogen
`double bond. This intermediate then decomposes to generate aryl radicals-.23
`
`u=or
`
`},‘==<o
`
`_.._§ }\ ‘ER ._g - + N2 + RCO}-
`
`W. P. S. Engel, Chem. Rev. 50. 99 (1950).
`20. K. Talcagi and R. .1. Crawford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 5912- (1971).
`‘21. R. F. Bridger and G. A. Russell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 3154 {I963}.
`22. M. Schmirtel and C. Riichardt, J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1119., 2750 (193?).
`23. C.‘RfichardI and B. Freudenberg, Tetrahedron Lett, 3623 (1964); J. I. G. Cadogan, Acc. Chem. Res.
`4, 186 (1971).
`
`4.
`
`Noven Ex. 100:7
`Page 19 of 84
`
`Page 19 of 84
`
`Noven Ex. 1007
`
`

`
`A technique that is a convenient source of radicals for study by EPR involves
`photolysis of a mixture of di-I-butyl peroxide, triethylsilane, and the alkyl bromide
`corresponding to the radical to be studied.“ Photoly

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket