throbber
. Chemical Stability
`,
`of Pharmaceuticals ‘
`.
`A Handbook for Pharmacists ,
`
`Second Edition
`
`Kenneth A. Connors
`
`.
`
`School of Pharmacy, The University of Wisconsin" _
`
`a A“ '
`Gordon L. Amidon’
`College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan
`'35
`
`Valentino J. Stella 4
`School of Pharmacy, The University of Kansas
`
`A Wiley-Interscience Pnhlieation ‘
`
`JOHN WILEY & soNs
`New York 0 Chichester I Brisbane I Toronto 0‘ Singapore
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 1 of 35
`
`Page 1 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Copyright © 1986 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada.
`
`Reproduction or translation of any part of this work
`beyond that permitted by Section 107 or 108 of the
`1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission
`·of the copyright owner is unlawful. Requests for
`permission or further information should be addressed to
`the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data:
`Connors, Kenneth A. (Kenneth Antonio), 1932-
`Chemical stability of pharmaceuticals.
`
`"A Wiley-lnterscience publication."
`Includes bibliographies find index.
`I. Drug stability.
`I. Amidon, Gordon L. II. Stella,
`I. Drug
`Valentino J., 1946-
`.
`III. Title.
`[DNLM:
`Stability-handbooks. 2. Kinetics-handbooks.
`QV 735 C752c]
`
`· RS424.C66 1986
`ISBN 0-471-87955-X
`
`615'.18
`
`85-31455
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I
`
`Page 2 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`CHAPTER 5
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`Oxidative and photochemical reactions are, for the
`most part, one-electron reactions as opposed to reac(cid:173)
`tions discussed in Chapter 4, which are two-electron
`reactiona. For the hydrolytic reactions in Chapter 4,
`a free pair of electrons on a heteroatom in one mole(cid:173)
`cule, a nucleophilic center, attacked an electrophilic
`center on a second molecule, whereas oxidative and
`photochem-ical reactions proceed through free radical
`or free-radical-like reaction pathways.
`Most drugs exist in a reduced form, so the presence
`of 20% oxygen in the atmosphere creates obvious poten(cid:173)
`tial stability problems for ~hese molecules. That is,
`many molecules tend to be converted to a more oxidized
`state. Kinetically, however; there is a sufficient
`energy barrier to ma,n y such reactions (the energy 0 f
`activation) that not all molecules are subject to
`measurable rates of spontaneous oxidation or autox(cid:173)
`idation. The radiation from
`the_ sun and artificial
`light, particularly visible and ultraviolet light, is
`also ubiquitous, so that molecules capable of rear(cid:173)
`ranging upon absorption of radiation ener-gy must be
`protected.
`Our overall mechanistic understanding of oxidative
`and photochemical reactions is poor.
`The reason for
`this will be understandable as this chapter proceeds.
`Simply stated, many oxidative and photochemical r•ac(cid:173)
`tions involve very complex reaction pathways with mul(cid:173)
`tiple intermediates so that even though the stoichi(cid:173)
`ometry of a reaction might be given by Eq. (5.1) the
`kinetic law is not as simple as Eq. (5.2).
`> ROOH
`
`( 5. 1)
`
`82
`
`I-
`
`Page 3 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation V
`
`83
`
`dIROOHI
`dt
`.
`
`-
`? k[RH][02]
`
`'
`(5.2)
`
`rAlso, unlike two—electron reactions where catalysis is
`often limited to acid/base or nucleophilic catalysis,
`trace quantities of environmental agents can powerful—
`ly catalyze one—electron reactions.
`For example,
`trace contamination of metal
`ions can catalyze oxida—
`tive reactions by many orders of magnitude,
`and the
`presence of a photosensitizing agent can cause a-mole—
`cule that
`in the absence of
`the photosensitizing agent
`is not photolabile to undergo an apparent photochemi~
`cal reaction.
`I
`'
`‘
`introduce,
`In this chapter we
`from a basic view—
`point,
`the kinetics and other factors affecting oxida—
`tive and photochemical
`reactions and describe how
`these reactions can be prevented or at
`least
`inhibited.
`‘
`-
`
`A.
`
`OXIDATION
`
`1.
`
`'Nature of Oxidation
`
`,
`
`to real—
`When one considers oxidation, it is important
`ize that
`this reaction is a complementary one;
`its
`partner
`is reduction.
`.One cannot happen without
`the
`other. Oxidation/reduction (redox)
`reactions involve
`the transfer‘of one or more oxygen or hydrogen atoms
`or
`the transfer of electrons.
`The classical,
`and
`familiar,
`inorganic redox system can be described by
`Eq.
`(5.3), where e‘ represents an electron and n the
`
`reduced form -———4> oxidized + ne~
`.
`.
`<——"—
`‘
`
`,
`
`'
`
`(5.3)
`
`redox reactions are elec—
`Thus
`number of electrons.
`tron—transfer processes, and this aspect must be con—
`sidered if the basic process is to be understood.
`In the case of organic compounds and especially the
`oxidation state of carbon,
`the oxidation state is de—
`termined by the number of bonds from carbon to oxygen.
`For example,
`the state of oxidation of one—carbon com—
`pounds
`increases as shown in Eq.
`(5.4).
`As stated
`earlier,
`the mechanism of
`this process is not as sim—
`ple as suggested by the stoichiometry of
`the reaction.
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 4 of 35
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`84
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`oxidation
`
`H
`H
`I
`I
`H,
`~
`H-C-H ~ H-C-OH ~ C=O ~ H-C ~ O=C=O
`I
`I
`"'-oH
`W""'
`H
`H
`
`reduction
`Also the simple redox system illustrated by Eq. (5.3)
`is made more complex by the medium in which the reac(cid:173)
`tion occurs.
`For example,
`the oxidation of hydroqui(cid:173)
`none
`( 1, 4_-dihydroxybenzene) to its quinone (p-benzo(cid:173)
`quinone) is .often illustrated in the textbooks by
`
`(5.4)
`
`Eq. (5.5). HOVH
`
`quinone
`hydroquinone
`Yet in aqueous solution, free electrons, e-, do not
`exist and the state of ionization of the hydroquinone
`is affected by the solution pH. Therefore in aqueous
`solution the oxidation of hydroquinones is more accu(cid:173)
`rately described by Eq. (5.6).
`
`(5.5)
`
`As will be discussed later, the oxidation of hydro(cid:173)
`quinone and other phenols is even more complex than
`shown by Eq. (5.6)
`in that the product of the immedi(cid:173)
`ate oxidation, the quinone, can catalyze the oxidation
`
`Page 5 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`85
`
`This process is called autocatalysis or
`further.
`product catalysis.
`
`2. Kinetics of Oxidation
`
`take place spontaneously under mild
`Oxidations that
`conditions are often called "autoxidation";
`the major—
`ity of
`these are free—radical
`reactions.
`Free radi—
`cals are chemical species that possess an unpaired
`electron.
`0xygen,,in its ground state,
`is a diradical
`with the electronic configuration
`
`0.0.:ch
`O. .0
`
`therefore, would "like" to fill its outer
`Oxygen,
`electron shell
`to produce 022“,
`the peroxy dianion.
`To do so, oxygen must accept
`two electrons from a
`donor molecule(s)
`and in so doing could in theory
`generate other free—radical molecules.
`In most autoxidation reactions, even though oxygen
`is often involved,
`the initiation of
`the oxidation re—
`action does not
`involve molecular oxygen,
`that
`is,
`oxygen itself in its ground state does not really ini—
`tiate oxidation reactions. Let us consider the gener—
`al kinetic behavior of olefin autoxidation described
`by Eqs.
`(5.7)—(5.9)
`M
`
`RI-
`
`;
`'
`k
`+ R"—CH2—CH=CH—R"' —l€>R"—CH—CH=CH—R"'I+ R'H (5.7)
`‘
`0-0”
`
`.
`R"—CH—CH=CH—R"'
`
`I
`k2
`+ 02 -—€>R“-CH—CH=CH-R"'
`
`.
`
`(5.8)
`
`0-0'
`
`'
`I
`R"—CH-CH=CH—R"'
`
`.
`.
`k3 .
`+ R"—CH2—CH=CH-R"' ——€>R"—CH—CH=CH-R"'
`
`+
`
`(5.9)
`
`o—oH
`l
`R"-CH—CH=CH~R"'
`
`a hydroperoxide
`
`(5.7) represents the initia-’
`The reaction given by Eq.
`tion reaction. Generally the species R" is not
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 6 of 35
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`86
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`oxygen but some other peroxy radical present in the
`solution, trace quantities of metal
`ions such as
`ferrous or cupric ions, or radicals formed
`in the
`solution from the absorption of light (visible or
`ultraviolet).
`The reactions given by Eqs. (5.8) and (5.9) repre(cid:173)
`sent chain propagation reactions, i.e., one radical
`produces one radical plus a hydroperoxide molecule.
`Radical species in solution, apart from reacting with
`oxygen or another unreacted molecule to produce anoth(cid:173)
`er free radical, can also react with each other to
`produce sta_ble or metastable products. This step is
`called a chain termination step and three examples 'are
`given in Eqs. (5.10)-(5.12).
`
`Ro 2 · + Ro 2 ·
`
`k4
`~
`
`k
`Ro 2 · + R" ~-
`k6
`~
`
`R.· + R·
`
`stable products
`
`(5.10)
`
`(5.11)
`
`(5.12)
`
`Considering this reaction mechan-ism, and simplifying
`Eqs. (5.7)-(5.9) to Eqs. (5.13)-(5.15),
`
`initiator
`
`k1
`----=--7 R·
`
`R· + 02
`
`k2
`---=-7 Ro 2 ·
`
`Ro 2 · + RH
`
`ks
`~ ROOH + R·
`
`(5.13)
`
`(5.14)
`
`( 5.15)
`
`assuming normal levels of oxygen, applying a steady(cid:173)
`state assumption to the radical species R02 · and R ·,
`letting k 2 [R"][0 2 ] = ks[Ro 2 ·][RH], and k4 = k 5 = k6 =
`kt, it can be shown that the rate of hydroperoxide
`formation is given by Eq. (5.16) where ri is the ini(cid:173)
`tiation rate.
`
`It is obvious.from this expression that the rate of
`hydroperoxide formation is proportional to the square
`root of the initiation rate,. r1. Also, if oxygen
`
`(5.16)
`
`Page 7 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`87
`
`concentration is very high, k2[02]
`Eq.
`(5.16) collapses to Eq.
`(5.17):
`
`>> k3[RH];
`
`. Z
`
`'
`
`dt
`
`kt
`
`The reaction will apparently be first order in start~
`ing material, RH.= On
`the other hand,
`if k3[RH]
`>>
`k2[02],
`then Eq.
`(5.18) is realized.
`
`Wdflkzwz]
`
`1.x
`
`'
`
`-
`
`(5.1s)
`
`"pseudo
`these conditions the reaction will be
`Under
`zero order" with respect
`to RH,
`that is,
`[RH] does not
`appear
`in Eq.
`(5.18),
`and the reaction will be first
`order in [02].‘
`If\the term ri actually involves RH or
`02,
`the order of
`the reaction with respect
`to RH and
`02 could be as high as 1.5.
`(5.7)—(5.15) assumes
`The mechanism defined by Eqs.
`that
`the species ROOH is stable and that
`the termina—
`tion products are stable.
`In the case of olefins,
`the
`hydroperoxide can break down to produce volatile and
`nonvolatile products as well as multiple radicals.
`
`0-0H
`
`.
`I
`R"—CH—CH=CH—R""-%R"-CHO + R"'-CH=CH'
`
`+ :0H_
`
`(5,19)‘
`
`The rancidity of unsaturated cooking oils and oil—
`based paints is the result of
`this fragmentation of
`olefinic bonds
`to produce aldehydes, acids, and alco—
`hols as well as multiple radicals.
`As can be seen in
`Eq.
`(5.19); one hydroperoxide molecule produces two
`radicals.
`'If this reaction is favorable, not only do
`we have a chain propagation reaction, but chain
`branching reactions will be observed.
`If branching
`does occur,
`the oxidation kinetics and products become
`even more complex than those defined by the initia—
`tion, propagation, and termination sequence.
`Qualitatively,
`the kinetics of oxidative free—radi-
`cal reactions follow the pattern illustrated in Figure
`5.1.
`A characteristic of many such reactions is a lag
`time or
`lag phase corresponding to the gradual buildup»
`of radicals via the initiation step..
`If the radicals
`
`
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 8 of 35
`
`Page 8 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`88
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`100
`
`80
`
`co
`
`c :s 60
`"' E
`~
`co
`::>
`0 40
`*
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Time
`
`Illustration of percentage of drug re(cid:173)
`FIGURE 5.1.
`maining vs .. time for an oxidative free-radical reac(cid:173)
`tion:
`curve a initiation step only; curve b initia(cid:173)
`tion plus propagation; and curve c init~ation, propa(cid:173)
`gation, and chain branching. Arrows indicate the lag
`times.
`
`produced from the initiation step are stable then as
`soon as the catalytic species is consumed the reaction
`stops (curve a in Fig. 5.1).
`If the radicals produced
`from the initiator go into a propag_ation cycle, curve
`b results.
`The overall loss of drug will then often
`follow a first-order decay curve with respect to drug,
`depending on the oxygen dependency of the reaction.
`If chain branching occurs the overall loss of drug
`shows an acceleration phase (see curve c) with maximum
`acceleration occurring at -50% drug remaining.
`The reaction kinetics defined by Eqs. (5.7)-(5.19)
`were for a reaction in .which the reactant RH was not
`capable of ionization. For the oxidation of drugs or
`pharmaceutical additives, the kinetics are further
`complicated wh~n the state of ionizatibn of the mole(cid:173)
`cule is affected by solution pH.
`In the oxidation of
`sodium sulfite (or bisulfite) a first approximation of
`the oxidation mechanism is given by Eqs. (5.20)(cid:173)
`(5.27),
`
`Page 9 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`89
`
`3037+ M+ ————4> 305'
`
`+ M'
`
`so;-
`
`+ 02
`
`:———:>‘sog'
`
`’
`
`305-
`_
`SO5
`
`-
`
`+ H803
`2-
`o
`S 3
`
`+
`
`2_
`o
`s 3
`
`_
`+ H805
`
`————e> Hso5
`2_‘
`05
`
`-———:> s
`<T____
`
`+ 303'
`_
`+ $03
`
`-
`
`(pH 5 7)
`
`<
`(pH g 7)
`
`————4> HSO
`
`_
`4 + 304
`
`_
`
`(pH 5 7)_
`
`303‘
`
`+ So§_
`
`-—-—4> 230%— (pH < 7)
`W“
`—
`
`_
`
`'
`
`_.
`$03
`
`'
`
`_
`+ so ' ——~—4>
`5
`<______
`
`2;
`s
`.206
`
`+ 02
`
`~
`
`(5.20)
`
`(5.21)
`
`(5.22)
`
`.
`(5 23)
`
`,
`‘
`(5 24)
`
`-(5 25)
`
`.
`(5 26)
`
`SOE'
`
`w—
`,
`+ inhibitor ——~—4> nonreactive products
`
`(5.27)
`
`'
`
`(5.21)—
`(5.20) is the initiation step, Eqs.
`where Eq.
`(5.23) are propagation steps, Eqs.
`(5.24) and (5.25)
`_oxidation steps leading to the ultimate oxidation
`product, 3042*, and Eqs.
`(5.26) and (5.27)
`termination
`steps.
`M+
`is a metal
`ion catalyst.
`The overall ki—
`netics of sulfate formation or sulfite loss is very
`complicated, although it has been shown that at pHs
`<
`8
`the proportionality given by Eq.
`(5.28)
`is observed
`(1)_
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`d[SO42‘]
`‘ dt
`
`u [M+][SO3
`
`2‘.
`
`][Hso§]-
`
`.
`

`
`(5.28)
`
`in this expression there is no oxygen con—
`Note that
`centration dependency,
`that
`the reaction proceeds
`faster at higher pHs, and that
`the reaction is sensi—
`tive to metal
`ion catalysis, especially by Fe3+, Mn2+,
`and Cu2+.
`The pH dependency arises because the frac-
`tions of sulfite_and bisulfite ions are pH dependent.
`The kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of phenols
`and substituted 0— and p—dihydroxybenzenes
`in aqueous
`solution are also very complex and pH dependent.
`In
`general
`terms the oxidation of such molecules is very
`sensitive to the presence of metal
`ions, oxygen con—,
`centration, and pH, with increasing rates of oxidation
`J
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page]()of35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`90
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`at higher pHs. This suggests that it. is the anionic
`form of the phenol that is most sensitive to oxida(cid:173)
`tion.
`In the case of dihydroxybenzenes, such as epi(cid:173)
`nephrine and hydroquinones,
`the rate of oxidation
`often exhibits apparent second-order dependency on
`
`HO
`
`epinephrine
`hydroquinone
`hydroxide ion c~ncentration. The oxidation rates of
`hydroquinone and alkyl-substituted hydroqtiinones have
`been extensively studied because of their use in the
`photographic industry (2). Their mechanism of oxida(cid:173)
`tion appears .to be
`
`¢~¢·
`
`OH
`
`o-
`HQ2-
`
`However, it was found that the kinetics of oxidation
`of hydroquinone seemed to be dependent on quinone con(cid:173)
`centration; that is, the quinone; the immediate prod(cid:173)
`uct of the reaction ,
`c'a t a 1 y zed the oxidation of the
`hydroquinone. This was explained by the following re(cid:173)
`action,
`in which the quinone reacts with· the dianion
`of the hydroquinone to form a very unstable semiqui(cid:173)
`none radical, which very rapidly and spontaneously re(cid:173)
`acts with oxygen to form two molecules of the quinone
`and hydrogen peroxide (H202), or dimerizes to a stable
`product (3).

`
`Page 11 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`91
`
` semiquinone
`
`radical
`
`‘dimer
`
`2
`7_
`
`+
`
`H202
`
`O
`In both of the above reaction schemes it is the di—
`anion of the hydroquinone that appears to be the reac—
`tive species.
`The
`two pKa's of hydroquinone are )9
`and under pH conditions found in most formulations the
`fraction of hydroquinone present as
`its dianion is
`given by Eq.
`(5.29), where Kal and Kaz are the first
`and second dissociation constants of hydroqninone.
`
`[HQZ—]
`_
`fHQz_'_ [HQ]T0TAL
`
`=
`
`[H+]2 +
`
`.
`KalKag
`[H+]Ka1 + KalKag
`
`>
`
`5 2
`' 9)
`
`(
`
`With the conditions [H+]
`becomes Eq.
`(5.30).
`
`$> Kal and Kaz, Eq.
`-
`
`(5.29)
`
`Ra
`Ra
`Ra Ra
`fHQZ_ _ -_iL___Ei= __l___ii.[onj]2
`+
`2
`2
`[H ]
`Kw
`
`.
`
`'
`
`,
`
`-
`
`/
`
`'
`'
`(5.30)
`
`the hydroqui-
`if the rate of oxidation of
`Therefore,
`none is proportional
`to the hydroquinone dianion con—
`centration,-it can be seen that
`the rate of oxidation
`‘will be apparent second—order
`in hydroxide ion concen—
`tration.
`This
`is confirmed by the data in Fig. 5.2
`for the oxidation of m—dimethylhydroquinone and hydro—
`quinone in aqueous buffer solutions.
`Similar pH de—
`pendencies on the rate of oxidation of ascorbic acid
`(see curves 3 and 4 of Fig.
`1 of
`the L—ascorbic acid
`monograph) and captopril
`(see Fig.
`1 of the captopril
`monograph) have been observed.
`In each case the rate
`of oxidative decomposition under aerobic conditions is,
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 12 0f 35
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`92
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`7.0
`
`pH
`FIGURE 5.2. pH-rate profiles for the oxidation of
`( 0> at
`hydroquinune (G) and m-dimethylhydroquinone
`The slopes of the lines are 1.96 and 1.98, re(cid:173)
`25°C.
`spectively. Both systems were studied in phosphate
`buffer.
`
`proportional to the fraction of the drug in the anion(cid:173)
`ic form, namely the ascorbate anion or the thiolate
`(RS-) in the case of ~aptopril.
`Interpretation of temperature effects on oxidative
`reactions is made difficult by the multiple steps in
`many of the reactions and because oxygen solubility in
`water (and other solvents) is temperature dependent.
`Since each reaction in a complex scheme will have its
`own activation energy, it is possible that as. the tem(cid:173)
`perature is changed a different reaction will become
`rate determining.
`Theoretically~ under such circum(cid:173)
`stances, the adherence of the reaction-rate/tempera(cid:173)
`ture relationship to the Arrhenius equation will b~eak
`down. Practically, however, over a
`limited tempera(cid:173)
`ture range, Arrhenius behavior may be observed, but
`the activation energy is very much an "apparent" acti(cid:173)
`vation energy for which the reaction conditions must
`be clearly stated.
`Included in this "apparent" acti(cid:173)
`vation energy is the temperature dependence of the
`oxygen solubility. Table 5.1 gives the 02 content of
`water at various temperatures if fhe water is satu(cid:173)
`rated by air or by pure oxygen. As can be seen for
`the air data, a 20°C change in temperature (5 ----725°C)
`results in a 40% decrease in oxygen concentration.
`If
`
`Page 13 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`
`
`Oxidation
`
`93
`
`TABLE 5.1. Oxygen Content of Water Under Air and Pure
`Oxygen at Atmospheric Pressure and Various
`Temperatures.
`
`
`
`Millimoles of 02 Millimoles of 02
`from air per mL
`from pure OE per
`Temperature (°C)
`of Hzoarb
`mL of H20 ,c
`
`
`-—
`o
`2:18'x 10-3
`0.386 x 10-3
`5
`e—
`0.34
`x 10—3
`10
`——
`0.304 x 10“3
`15
`4—
`0.267 x 10—3
`20
`——
`0.232 x 10—3
`25
`1.29 x 10-3
`——
`50
`9.28 x 10-4
`—-‘
`100
`.51 x 10-4
`'q
`
`
`'
`
`'
`
`aFrom Reference 4.
`bCalculated from cc of 02 in H20 and the expression
`PV = nRT.
`CFrom Reference 5.‘
`
`
`
`
`
`in
`the rate of reaction under study is first order
`oxygen concentration,
`then a ninefold increase in rate
`(Q10 = 3) due to the direct effect of
`temperature on
`the rate—controlling step will
`show up experimentally
`as only a 5.5—fold increase im mate owing to the con—
`/
`comitant change.in oxygen-concentration.
`
`3. Oxidative Pathways @f Phanmaceutical Interest
`
`A few selected oxidative reactions of pharmaceutical
`interest are illustrated here;
`the stability mono~
`graphs
`include other examples. Many drug Compounds
`have been reported to be subject
`to autoxidation,
`in—
`cluding adriamycin hydrochloride, amphotericin B,
`apo—
`morphine, ascorbic acid, Capropril, chlorpromazine and
`other phenothiazine derivatives, cyanocobalamin,
`cys~
`teine, epinephrine, ergometrine, hydrocortisone,
`iso—
`amyl nitrite,
`isoproterenol, kanamycin, 6—mercaptopur—
`ine, morphine, neomycin, norepinephrine, novobiocin,
`p—aminobenzoic acid, paraldehyde, penicillin, pheny1—'
`ephrine, physostigmine, prednisolone, prednisone,
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 14 0f 35
`
`Page 14 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`94
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`procaine, resorcinol, riboflavin, streptomycin and
`dihydrostreptomycin, sulfadiazine, terpenes,
`the
`tetracyclines, __ thiami_I!_EL,_ and vitamins A, D, and E.
`The unwanted conversion of fats, oils, flavors, and
`perfumes to a rancid state is due to oxidation of
`these unsaturated molecules.
`The double bonds are
`oxidized to form hydroperoxides, as demonstrated ear(cid:173)
`lier, which then produce aldehydes;
`the latter cause
`the offensive odors and unpleasant flavors. Vitamin A
`(see monograph) and amphotericin B (see monograph) are
`two drug molecules with extended conjugated double
`bonds that are very susceptible to oxidative break-
`down.
`Epinephrine forms colored products on oxidation
`[Eq. (5.31)].
`
`epinephrine quinone
`
`melanin
`pigments
`
`-H 0 2
`
`adrenochrome
`
`< 5. 31)
`
`The activity of riboflavin is contingent on its
`ability to take part in this redox equilibrium:
`
`Page 15 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`95
`
`6—..—
`
` ————>
`
`I
`(fr‘HOH) 3
`CHEOH
`
`.
`
`I
`
`H
`‘gHa
`(EHOH) 3
`CHZOH
`
`
`
`
`
`riboflavin
`"
`'
`
`‘
`
`dihydroriboflavin'
`‘
`. (5 . 32)
`
`Morphine dimerizes when oxidized.> Equation (5.33)
`shows the first step.
`
`
`
`morphine
`
`_
`
`,
`
`" '
`
`(5.33)
`
`formed morphine free radical couples with a mor—
`The
`phine molecule (at
`the free position ortho to the phe—
`nolic oxygen)
`to give the dimer
`(bimorphine or pseudo—
`morphine).
`”Hydrogen peroxide is also produced and can
`cause additional oxidation to the N—oxide.
`
`Vitamin E can form an epoxide, which then produces
`a quinone:
`vitamin E («Ftocopherol):
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 16 of 35
`
`
`
`Page 16 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`96
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`HO
`
`;FH3
`TH3
`H2-(cH2-cH2-CH-CH2J 2-cH2-CH2~H
`CH3
`CH3
`
`vitamin E epoxide
`
`~-tocopherylquinone
`
`(5.34)
`
`The phen.othiaziqes readily oxidize, producing a
`multitude of products.
`The degradation mechanism of
`promethazine and the influence of pH, metals, chelat(cid:173)
`ing agents, and antioxidants, have been extensively
`studied (6,7). The following r~actions have been pro(cid:173)
`posed and their products isolated.
`
`Sulfide and sulfhydryl-containing molecules are par(cid:173)
`ticularly vulnerable to oxidation. Captopril (see
`
`(5.35)
`
`Page 17 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`97
`
`is an example of a recently developed sulf—
`monograph)
`hydrylfldrug-with oxidative stability problems.
`.Sulf—
`”hydrylrcontaining molecules generally oxidiZe to their
`corresponding disulfides, Eq.
`(5.36).
`
`R—su
`
`§92—€>
`
`R-S—S~R + H20-
`
`.
`
`,
`
`(5.36)
`
`4.
`
`Inhibition of Oxidation
`
`Exclusion of Oxygen
`
`If a molecule requires the presence of oxygen to de—
`grade why not exclude oxygen from the formulation?
`For parenteral drugs this can be achieved by packaging
`the drug in glass ampuls that are heat sealed under an
`inert atmosphere.
`For
`tablets, capsules,
`and so on,'
`packaging of
`the formulation in a hermetic strip may
`be useful
`in preventing the oxidation.
`Quite often manufacturers would like to formulate a
`drug for parenteral administration in,a multidose
`vial, which is sealed with a
`rubber stopper.
`It
`is
`very difficult
`to formulate very oxygen~sensitive
`drugs
`in such multidose vials because rubber
`is rea—
`sonably permeable to oxygen and both synthetic and
`natural
`rubber
`tend to release additives capable of
`catalyzing oxidative reactions. Oxidatively unstable
`drugs formulated in multidose vials require more than
`
`just oxygen exclusion during sealing to prevent oxida—
`tion from occurring.
`‘
`The
`importance of deoxygenating the water and the
`headspace atmosphere in an ampul prior to sealing can
`be seen in the following calculation using/captopril
`as an example.
`The stoichiometry of
`the oxidative
`breakdown of captopril
`is given by Eq.
`(5.37), showing
`that 2 mol-of captopril are lost for each half—mole of
`oxygen consumed.
`
`1/202
`
`.
`captopril disulfide
`
`COO
`
`(5.37)
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`‘ Page 18 of35
`
`
`
`Page 18 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`98
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`injection of captopril, in a 2-mL ampul,
`A 2 mg/2 mL
`has a headspace of -1 mL.
`The 2 mg of captopril is
`equivalent to 9.2 x 1o-8 mmol of captopril. At 25°C
`there are 0.23 x Lo-3 mmol of dissolved oxygen in each
`mL of water .for a total of 0.46 x 10-3 mmol of oxygen.
`The 1 mL of headspace, assuming that it is air, con(cid:173)
`tains 8.6 x 10-3 mmol of oxygen. Based on the stoi(cid:173)
`chiometry of Eq. (5.37) it can be seen that the 9.06 x
`1o-3 mmol of oxygen in the system would be capable of
`degrading 3.62 x 10-2 mmol of captopril, that is,
`there is more ·than enough oxygen present in this for(cid:173)
`mulation to completely d~grade the captopril.
`If the
`oxygen in the headspace is removed by flushing with an
`inert gas, the 0.46 x 1o-3 mmol of oxygen in the water
`are still capable of degrading '1.84 x 10-3 mmol of
`captopril, or 20% of the formulation.
`By· performing
`such calculations it is possible to predict how thor(cid:173)
`ough the exclusion of oxygen from the system must be
`in order to prevent the oxidative breakdown of sensi(cid:173)
`tive drugs.
`
`Alteration of Solution pH
`
`As has already been discussed, the oxidation of many
`drugs is pH sensitive. Acidic drugs such as ascorbic
`a c i d , ph e n o 1 s ,
`a n d
`s u 1 f h,Y d r y 1 c om pound s a 11 d e g r ad e
`more rapidly in neutral to alkaline pH conditions.
`For such drugs the pH range 3 to 4 is generally forind
`most useful in minimizing oxidation. Obviously, this
`pH range would not be useful for acidic drugs that
`have limited aqueous solubility at low pH values.
`Amine drugs such as the phenothiazines appear to be
`most stable in their protonated forms,
`that is, also
`at low pH values.
`
`Protection from Light
`
`Oxidative breakdown of drugs gerrerally proceeds
`through the sequence of initiation, propagation (and
`maybe chain branching), and termination. As mentioned
`earlier, a triggering force that may promote oxidation
`is "light" (namely, certain components of the electro(cid:173)
`magnetic spectrum). Not all photolytic re~ctions are
`oxidative in nature and not all oxidative reactions
`require light as"either an initiator or as an integral
`component of the propagation steps.
`If, however,
`
`Page 19 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`Oxidation
`
`99
`
`light does initiate or promote an oxidative breakdown
`of.a drug,
`the exclusion of
`the particular wavelength
`“range of
`light responsible for
`the catalysis will'
`often suppress the oxidation. This can be achieved by
`the total exclusion offlight using an opaque container
`or the use of pigmented glass capable of excluding the
`damaging wavelengths.
`This will be discussed further
`in the section of this chapter on photolysis.
`
`Use of Chelating Agents and Antioxidants
`
`Oxidation reactions can be inhibited by agents that
`are
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`ion initiators of
`chelating agents for metal
`free— radical oxidation reactions;
`reducing agents,
`that
`is,
`substances that can
`reduce an oxidized drug;
`is,
`that
`(c) preferentially oxidized compounds,
`ag-ents
`that are more readily oxidized than the
`agents they are to protect; or
`re—
`chain terminators,
`that is, agents capable of
`V acting with radicals in solutions to produce a
`new species,
`a chain terminator radical, which
`does not
`reenter the radical propagation cycle.
`The new radical may be
`intrinsically stable or
`may dimerize to form an inert molecule.
`
`(d)
`
`four categories are often classified
`in all
`Compounds
`as antioxidants (or antoxidants).
`It is probably more
`accurate to classify compounds
`in categories (b)—(d)
`as antioxidants and chelating-agents as synergists.
`These categories are now treated in more detail.)
`
`(a) Chelating Agents. Oxidative reactions are
`often initiated by metal
`ions such as Fe3+, Cu2+,
`003+, N12+, Mn3+.
`These metal
`ions act as initiators
`because in their oxidation states they are capable of
`acting as radicals.
`For example, Cu2+ has 27
`elec—
`trons and requires one more electron to complete the
`electron pair.
`Metal
`ions catalyze oxidative reactions in a number
`of ways.
`They can react directly with oxygen to pro-
`duce an oxygen radical, which can then initiate an
`autoxidation.
`The metal
`ion can form a cbmplex with’
`oxygen and subsequently form a peroxy radical.
`The
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 20 of 35
`
`
`
`Page 20 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`100
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`ion can react with the drug itself to r'orm a
`metal
`radical, as illustrated by Eq. (5.38), which is then
`able to enter into a propagation cycle [see Eqs. (5.7)
`and (5.13)].
`
`Mn+ + RH.
`
`(5.38)
`
`ion can also react with a hydroperoxide in
`The metal
`the formulation to catalyze the breakdown, given by
`Eq. (5.39).
`Mn+ + R'OOH ~ M(n- 1 )+ + H+ + R'o
`
`(5.39)
`

`
`2
`
`R'OOH co~ld be a hydroperoxide of the drug itself or
`of some other component of the formulation.
`Chelating agents act in an antioxidant capacity by
`binding metal ions, thus removing them,
`thermodynami(cid:173)
`cally speaking, from solution. The most effective
`chelating agents used pharmaceutically are ethylenedi(cid:173)
`aminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, many of the
`amino ac·ids, phosphoric acid (weak), and tartaric
`acid.
`EDTA and citric acid are the two most useful
`agents. Their metal-binding capacity is dependent on
`their state of ionization, both being most effective
`when their carboxyli~ acid groups are fully ionized.
`Thus, they lose their chelating capacity at low pH.
`
`EDTA tetraanion (edetate)
`
`citric acid trianion
`
`Just because an agent is able to chelate metal ions
`does not mean that it will reduce the effectiveness of
`the metal ion to act as a catalyst.~ There are circum(cid:173)
`stances in which the metal ion may bind to some func(cid:173)
`tional groups and in this bound capacity actually may
`be a better catalyst than in the unbound state. The
`chelating agents mentioned above, how~ver, generally
`act to lower the catalytic activity of the metal ions
`towards radical chain reactions.
`
`Page 21 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`
`
`Oxidation
`
`101
`
`Reducing Agents.‘ This approach is generally
`(b)
`not used as-a means of preventing oxidation.
`Sodium
`,thiosulfate and ascorbic acid are two reduCing agents.~..
`that have been used in this capacity.
`
`'These are
`(a) Preferentially Oxidized Compounds.
`compounds
`that are moreJreadily oxidized than the
`agents they are to protect. Essentially these agents
`act as oxygen scavengers.
`Two good pharmaceutical
`examples of oxygen scavengers are sodium bisulfite
`(and sulfite) and ascorbic acid.
`Sodium sulfite re—
`acts with oxygen according to Eq.
`(5.40).
`
`5032‘
`
`+ 3502 ——-—> 3042‘
`
`((5-40)
`
`is possible to calculate the approximate amount of
`It
`antioxidant needed to use up all the oxygen in an am—
`pul,
`for example, by calculating the amount of oxygen
`dissolved in the water and the headspace of the ampul.
`In this example,
`2 mol of
`sodium sulfite equivalents
`(as sodium bisulfite) would be needed to consume each
`mole of oxygen.
`The sulfites are very commonly used, and a word of
`caution is in order.
`In the process of acting as an—
`tioxidants, sulfites yield acid sulfates, which cause
`a drop in pH. Also, sulfites can readily form inac~
`tive addition compounds, as with epinephrine (see
`monograph).
`They react with compounds
`such as
`a1—
`kenes, alkyl halides,
`and aromatic nitro and_carbonyl
`compounds.
`Sometimes, as with thiamine,
`they may
`cleave molecules.
`_
`,
`the sulfite ions
`Although the nucleophilicity of
`can be a disadvantage,
`there are circumstances where
`this nucleophilicity is an advantage.
`For example,
`in
`the oxidatidn of hydroquinone,
`it appears that the im—
`mediate prOduct of
`the oxidation,
`its corresponding
`quinone,
`can act as a catalyst for further oxidation.
`Sodium sulfite (or bisulfite) can react with the qui—
`none and hydrogen peroxide to form hydroquinone mono—
`sulfonate, and sulfate as described by Eq.
`(5.41).
`
`
`
`Noven EX. 1015
`
`Page 22 of 35
`
`Page 22 of 35
`
`Noven Ex. 1015
`
`

`

`102
`
`Oxidation and Photolysis
`
`0
`
`OH
`
`(5.41)
`
`It appears that. thiols can also act as antioxidants in
`a similar manner. All the major water-soluble antiox(cid:173)
`idants, namely acetone sodium bisulfite, ascorbic
`acid, cysteine hydrochloride, isoascorbic acid, sodium
`bisulfite, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate; sodium
`metabisulfite, sodium sulfite, thioglycerol, thiogly(cid:173)
`colic acid, and thiosorbitol, act as oxy·gen scaven(cid:173)
`gers, although the thiol (sulfhydryl) group-containing
`antioxidan~s can also act as chain terminators (cate(cid:173)
`gory d).
`Few if any of the lipid-soluble antioxidants
`act as true ·oxygen scavengers except for, perhaps,
`ascorbityl palmitate.
`
`(d) Chain Terminators. Referring to the earlier
`discussions on the oxidation of olefins
`[Eqs. (5.7)(cid:173)
`(5.15)], bisulfite [Eqs. (5.20)-(5.27)], and phenols,
`all of these reaction·s proceed' through a radical mech(cid:173)
`anism. Therefore any substance that can donate a hy(

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket