throbber
Neuropharmacology Vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 1059--1064, 1991
`Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
`
`0028-3908/91 $3.00 + 0.00
`Copyright© 1991 Pergamon Press pic
`
`ANTAGONISM OF MORPHINE-INDUCED RESPIRATORY
`DEPRESSION BY NOVEL ANTICHOLINESTERASE
`AGENTS
`
`ESTHER ELMALEM, 1 M. CHOREV2 and MARTA WEINSTOCK 1*
`1Departments of Pharmacology and 2Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Hebrew University,
`Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
`
`(Accepted 13 May 1991)
`
`Summary-This study compared the effects of 3 novel antiAChE agents (derivatives of dimethy(cid:173)
`laminoethyl-phenyl carbamate) with that of physostigmine on the respiratory depression induced by
`morphine in rabbits. Each drug, RA6, (I mg i.v., 2 mg s.c.) RA7 (I or 2 mg i.v.); RA 1s (0.25 or 0.5 mg i.v.),
`physostigmine (0.05 or 0.1 mg i.v.) or saline (I ml), was injected simultaneously with morphine (8 mg i.v.)
`to groups of 6-10 rabbits. Respiration rate, blood gases and pH were monitored for 3 hr. Plasma ChE
`was measured before and at 15 min intervals after injection. The 4 antiAChE's were given to 40 other
`rabbits, which were sacrificed at the time of maximal antagonism of the respiratory depressant effect of
`morphine, in order to measure the activity of AChE in the medulla, cortex and hippocampus.
`Physostigmine (0.1 mg) only antagonized the increase in paC02 induced by morphine at 15 and 30 min.
`The drugs RA 1s (0.5 mg), RA6 (2.5 mg) and RA7 (2 mg) almost completely prevented the respiratory
`depression, without obvious signs of peripheral cholinergic hyperactivity, for at least 3 hr. There was no
`relationship between the degree of antagonism of the effects of morphine with any drug and that of
`inhibition of ChE in plasma. In contrast, a highly significant correlation (P < 0.01) was found between
`the former and the amount of inhibition of AChE in the medulla.
`It is suggested that the novel carbamates may have potential therapeutic application in reducing the
`respiratory depression of opiates, without impairing analgesia.
`
`Key words-respiratory depression, cholinesterase inhibition in medulla, carbamates, rabbit.
`
`In previous studies in human subjects and experimen(cid:173)
`tal animals it was shown that physostigmine could
`reduce the respiratory depressant effect of morphine,
`without
`interfering with
`the analgesic effect
`(Snir-Mor, Weinstock, Bahar and Davidson, 1983;
`Weinstock, Erez and Roll, 1981a; Weinstock,
`Davidson, Rosin and Schnieden, 1982). However, as
`potential therapy for concomitant use in patients
`receiving opiates, physostigmine has a number of
`serious disadvantages. The most important of these is
`its relatively high toxicity, which results in the
`appearance of distressing side effects at therapeutic
`doses (Christie, Shering, Ferguson and Glenn, 1981).
`Its low chemical stability and short duration of action
`also necessitate frequent administration.
`In an
`attempt to overcome these drawbacks, a number of
`novel anticholinesterase agents were synthesized in
`this laboratory. These agents readily penetrate the
`central nervous system, have a greater chemical stab(cid:173)
`ility and longer duration of action than that of
`physostigmine and several of them also have signifi(cid:173)
`cantly higher therapeutic ratios (Weinstock, Razin,
`Chorev and Tashma, 1986).
`
`*Address correspondence to Professor Marta Weinstock,
`Department of Pharmacology, The Hebrew University
`Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91010, Israel.
`
`The purpose of this study was twofold; to compare
`the abilities of three of these novel anticholinesterase
`agents with that of physostigmine to antagonize the
`respiratory depressant effect of morphine and to
`determine whether there is a correlation between the
`degree of such antagonism and the amount of inhi(cid:173)
`bition of acetyl-cholinesterase (AChE) in the medulla
`oblongata.
`
`METHODS
`
`Antagonism of the cardiovascular and respiratory de(cid:173)
`pressant effects of morphine by the anticholinesterase
`compounds
`Male and female rabbits, weighing 2.5-3 kg, were
`prepared with catheters in the central ear artery and
`marginal ear vein, as previously described (Weinstock
`et al., 198la). Rectal temperature was monitored on
`a telethermometer with the aid of a thermistor probe
`inserted into
`the rectum. Respiration rate was
`counted visually for periods of 30 sec. Blood gases
`and pH were measured on a blood gas analyzer
`(Instrumentation Laboratories) after correction for
`the appropriate body temperature from samples of
`blood taken from the ear artery. Blood pressure and
`heart rate were monitored on a Brush Gould
`recorder.
`
`1059
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`1060
`
`EsTHER ELMALEM et a/.
`
`Each of the following drugs, physostigmine, (0.05
`and 0.1 mg/kg); RA6 (0.5 and 1 mg/kg); RA 7 (1 and
`2 mg/kg) and RA 15 (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), was injected
`to
`intravenously (i.v.) with morphine (8 mg/kg)
`groups of 6-10 rabbits per drug. Nine other rabbits
`were given morphine alone with 0.1 ml/kg saline. An
`additional group of 6 rabbits received morphine
`(8 mg/kg) plus RA6 , (2.5 mg/kg) subcutaneously
`(s.c.). Blood samples were taken for blood gas analy(cid:173)
`sis, at least twice before administration of drug, 5, 15
`and 30 min after injection and thereafter at 30 min
`intervals, for 3 hr.
`
`Measurement of anticholinesterase activity in different
`areas of the brain of rabbits
`Rabbits were injected intravenously with either
`physostigmine or each of the above drugs, in the
`doses designated, or with RA6 , (s.c.). A minimum of
`4 animals was used for each treatment group. At
`stated times after the injection, the animals were
`sacrificed by air embolism. Eight additional rabbits
`were injected with saline or morphine (8 mg/kg) and
`sacrificed at the same times as the rabbits treated with
`the anticholinesterases, i.e. 4 after 60 min and two
`each after 15 and 30 min. The brain was removed and
`the frontal cortex, hippocampus and medulla were
`rapidly dissected out on ice, weighed individually and
`homogenized in phosphate buffer (0. 1 M) pH 8,
`containing 1% Triton. The mixture was centrifuged
`at 1000 g and the supernatant, which contained most
`of the solubilized enzyme, was used for the determi(cid:173)
`nation of the activity of AChE by the method of
`Ellman, Courtney, Andres and Featherstone (1961).
`The percentage inhibition of AChE by the drugs
`was computed by comparison with the pooled mean
`value for each of the appropriate saline-treated con(cid:173)
`trols.
`
`Estimation of plasma cholinesterase
`Blood (0.5 ml) was withdrawn into a heparinized
`syringe, during the control period and at 5, 15, 30, 60,
`90, 120, 150 and 180 min after injection of the AChE
`inhibitors. The blood was centrifuged at 4oC for
`5 min at 1000 g and the activity of AChE of the
`plasma was measured by the method of Ellman et at.
`(1961).
`
`Drugs
`The agents tested were RA6 (N -ethyl-3[1-( dimethyl(cid:173)
`amino)ethyl]phenyl carbamate) HCI. RA7 (N-ethyl,
`N -methyl-3[1-( dimethylamino )ethyl] phenyl carba(cid:173)
`mateHCI. RA 15(N -propyl-3( 1-dimethylamino )-ethyl](cid:173)
`phenyl carbamate HCI. Physostigmine salicylate
`(Sigma Ltd); Morphine HCl (Teva Pharmaceuticals,
`Israel). All drugs were made up freshly in sterile
`saline, which included an equal weight of sodium
`metabisulphite, to prevent oxidation. All doses are
`expressed as mg per kg of body weight of the
`appropriate salt.
`
`RESULTS
`Antagonism of the respiratory depressant effect of
`morphine by antiAChE
`Intravenous injection of morphine (8 mg) caused a
`significant fall in respiration rate of about 50% and
`a rise in paC02 of 54% within 15 min, which lasted
`for 2-3 hr. The pa02 was significantly reduced from
`114 + 6 to 85 + 5 at 15 and 30 min, while the pH fell
`from-7 .45 + o:007 to 7.27 ± 0.01 at 15--{)0 min. Mor(cid:173)
`phine also reduced the heart rate by 70-120 beats per
`min during the first hour and caused a small
`(5.2 ± 1.8 mmHg) but significant decrease in blood
`pressure during this period. Although control paC02
`values were very similar in all the treatment groups,
`the respiration rates varied from 67 ± 4 to 86 ± 6.
`These differences were normalized by representing the
`values after administration of drug as a percentage
`change from the resting rate for each animal.
`Physostigmine (0.05) had no significant influence
`on the respiratory depression induced by morphine at
`any time after injection, but caused mild salivation in
`all the rabbits. At a dose of 0.1 mg, physostigmine
`reduced the elevation in paC02 only at 15 and 30 min
`after injection and the fall in respiration rate at
`15 min (Fig. 1 ). Physostigmine potentiated the bray(cid:173)
`cardia induced by morphine at 15 and 30 min. These
`effects were accompanied by signs of peripheral
`cholinergic hyperactivity, including salivation, defae(cid:173)
`cation and slight muscular twitches.
`The drug RA15 (0.25 mg) significantly reduced the
`elevation in paC02 and the fall in respiratory rate
`after morphine, only at 15 min after injection (Fig. 2).
`At a dose of 0.5 mg, both the change in paC02 and
`in respiration rate, induced by morphine, were signifi(cid:173)
`cantly antagonised for 3 hr (Fig. 2) but the brady-
`
`---- ~11\E --+- ~11\E •···~·· ~11\E +
`t8mg)
`PHY$.0, 1 mQ
`PI-IVS.O.O&ng
`
`40
`
`25L-~~~--~----~~------~~
`LU 55
`f-
`<l a:
`e; 45
`!l!
`
`A···············b.···············A·····
`
`~ 25L_--~----~~----~~~~---:
`0
`2
`3
`
`TIME AFTER INJECTION (hours)
`
`Fig. I. The influence of physostigmine on the respiratory
`depressant effect of morph~ne. Physosti~ine. ~as _injected
`intravenously at the same ttme as morphme. Stgmficantly
`different from morphine alone, P < 0.05.
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`Opiate antagonism by anticholinesterases
`
`1061
`
`I to 3 hr after injection (Fig. 3). Side effects were only
`present in a mild degree.
`The drug RA7 had no effect against morphine, at
`a dose of 1 mg but completely prevented the respirat(cid:173)
`ory depression from 30 min to more than 3 hr when
`2 mg were given (Fig. 4). There were no signs of
`peripheral cholinergic activity at this dose, neither
`was the bradycardia potentiated. Moreover, the hy(cid:173)
`potensive effect of morphine was abolished and the
`reduction in pH markedly attenuated.
`
`Inhibition of plasma cholinesterase by the novel carbo(cid:173)
`mates and physostigmine
`The control value for plasma cholinesterase in
`these rabbits was 24 ±21-1M acetylcholine (ACh)
`hydrolysed/ml/hr. Physostigmine caused a maximum
`inhibition of 40% of this enzyme, 5 min after injec(cid:173)
`tion of a dose of 0.1 mg and this declined to 11% by
`2 hr (Table 1). In contrast, RA15 (0.5 mg) caused more
`than 70% inhibition of cholinesterase in plasma from
`5-90 min and more than 50% after 2 hr. Both RA6
`and RA7 also caused a maximum inhibition of more
`than 70% at 15 min, which declined slowly, like that
`of RA 15, over the next 3 hr (Table 1).
`
`The inhibition of AChE by the carbamates in the
`medulla of rabbits
`The antiAChE agents caused between 37 and 63%
`inhibition in cholinesterase, in the medulla oblongata,
`depending on the drug, the dose and the time of
`administration. In order to determine whether there
`was any correlation between the degree of inhibition
`of cholinesterase in the brainstem and the extent of
`
`......... ~ _._~·-··~·
`emo
`,.....,eo.2emo
`,.. ... ,~.omg
`
`40
`
`30
`
`25
`55
`
`45
`
`35
`
`25
`0
`
`·•·-·-·-·A
`*
`*
`
`,.•·-·-....... _ ·-......
`
`•
`*""'
`·--- .•. ,.,•'"4
`
`.f_,-f
`
`TIME AFTER INJECTION ChOU"s)
`
`2
`
`3
`
`Fig. 2. The influence of RA 15 on the respiratory depressant
`effect of morphine. The RA 15 was injected at the same time
`as morphine. *Significantly different from morphine alone,
`p <0.05.
`
`cardia was only increased at 15 min. Peripheral
`cholinergic activity was present to a lesser degree than
`with physostigmine. Only a very small antagonistic
`effect was shown by RA6 (1 mg) on the respiratory
`depressant effect of morphine. At a dose of 2 mg
`(i.v.), it caused marked cholinergic hyperactivity and
`therefore was not given together with morphine.
`However, when given subcutaneously, RA6 (2.5 mg)
`abolished the effect of morphine on respiration from
`
`- - - MOFIA-fi"E
`(Bmg)
`
`-·-· MOFPHI".e' +- ..... MC:IFR-IfrE: +
`FIA-e l1mol
`AAe 12.efTICI)
`
`40
`
`N
`
`.t· *
`-~--:.:.• .. ==-:-----.... ,.,------...-.------•-................. _______ ...,
`*
`""'•
`~30
`...
`.:'
`•. ,.-·-··!
`~--._
`· .......................... -·-*
`l
`*
`...
`
`II
`•I
`
`25~--~----~~~----~------~
`t!! 55
`~
`9j45
`.........
`~
`·-.................................. ..
`*
`*
`....
`ii::
`035
`.................
`..... *
`*
`~
`~ 25 ~.-. ____ ..__ _______ .._~----~
`
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`
`__.._ MOFPI-!1""1:
`(Bmg)
`
`-·-· MOFFI-ilf\E ~- •·· MOAPf-lrtE +
`FIA-7 (1mg)
`AA-7 (2mg)
`
`40 , ......
`
`I ... _______ ..,.. ______ "'+-------~---
`'* u•.
`r '·*
`1
`-....
`-.,
`
`*
`.............. .: ............. .; ......... -~----·-·.:
`
`24~----~--~--~~~~--~--~
`60
`
`~ 50
`9i
`~ 40
`ai 30
`
`,......,,.
`__ .... ___
`.. ............... ---~---__..,~
`"'...
`..---·-·---..... ______ ...
`
`0
`
`··-.•. _
`·---..... ,.-·'·~·
`~ 20~--------._--~----~------~
`3
`2
`0
`
`TINE AFTER INJECTION (hours)
`
`TIIVE AFTER IN..ECTJON (hours)
`
`Fig. 3. The influence of RA6 on the respiratory depressant
`effect of morphine. The RA6 (I mg) was injected intra(cid:173)
`venously and (2.5 mg) subcutaneously, at the same time as
`morphine. *Significantly different from morphine alone
`P < 0.05. The values of paC02 for morphine+ RA6
`(2.5 mg) were not significantly different from the pretreat-
`ment values from I to 3 hr.
`
`Fig. 4. The influence of RA7 on the respiratory depressant
`effect of morphine. The RA7 was injected intravenously at
`the same time as morphine. *Significantly different from
`morphine alone, P < 0.05. The values of the paC02 for
`morphine + RA7 (2 mg) was not significantly different from
`pretreatment values from 30 min to 3 hr.
`
`NP 30/10-C
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`1062
`
`EsTHER ELMALEM et a[.
`
`Drug
`Physo
`
`RA"
`
`RA7
`
`RAo
`
`Table I. Inhibition of plasma cholinesterase by physostigmine
`(Physo) and the novel carbamates
`Percentage
`inhibition
`(±SE)
`32.5 ± 1.6
`7.6 ± 1.8
`43.2 ± 3.6
`11.2 ± 3.5
`56.2 ± 1.2
`31.4 ± 1.1
`78.2 ± 0.9
`51.1 ± 2.2
`68.0 ± 0.8
`41.7 ± 1.2
`78.1 ± 0.6
`57.5 ± 0.8
`42.3 ± 1.1
`77.4 ± 0.6
`43.2 ± 1.2
`79.2 ± 1.0
`65.4 ± 1.1
`50.5 ± 0.9
`
`Dose
`(mg/kg)
`0.05
`0.05
`0.1
`0.1
`0.25
`0.25
`0.5
`0.5
`1.0
`1.0
`2.0
`2.0
`2.0
`1.0
`1.0
`2.5(s.c.)
`2.5
`2.5
`
`Time
`(min)
`5
`120
`5
`120
`5
`120
`5
`120
`15
`120
`15
`120
`180
`15
`120
`30
`120
`180
`
`the antagonism of the respiratory depressant effect of
`morphine, the increase in paC02 from a mean control
`value of 26.7-40.1 mmHg after morphine,
`i.e.
`13.4 mmHg, was designated as = 100%. Then the
`effect of each of the antiAChE agents at different
`times after injection was expressed in relation to the
`effect of morphine alone; e.g. the combination of
`morphine and RA7 (2 mg i.v.) at 30 min resulted in a
`paC02 of 28.4 mmHg, i.e. a 16% increase above the
`control value of 26.7 mmHg.
`inhibition
`Since
`the measurement of enzyme
`necessitated the sacrifice of each animal this was only
`measured at the time of peak antagonism of the effect
`of morphine and a whole time course was not per(cid:173)
`formed for each drug. The time after administration
`of drug that the medulla was removed and the activity
`of AChE was measured is shown in Figure 5. This
`shows a highly significant correlation (r = - 0.948;
`P < 0.001) between the percentage reduction in the
`maximum increase in paC02 with the antiAChe
`agents and morphine, and the percentage inhibition
`of AChE in the medulla of the brainstem. It also
`shows that this enzyme must be inhibited by at least
`
`40% before any significant reduction in the respirat(cid:173)
`ory depressant effect of morphine can be observed
`and that complete antagonism of the latter was
`achieved when the enzyme was inhibited by 60%.
`
`The inhibition of AChE by the carbamates in other
`areas of the brain
`The amount of AChE activity in three areas of
`brain, 30 min after an injection of saline or morphine
`(8 mg) is shown in Table 2. Morphine did not appear
`to cause any significant inhibition. The degree of
`enzyme inhibition by the carbamates in the frontal
`cortex, hippocampus and medulla of rabbits, sac(cid:173)
`rificed at the time of peak antagonism of morphine,
`is shown in Table 3. While no difference was seen in
`the 3 areas of brain with physostigmine, 15 min after
`injection, the inhibition became significantly greater
`in the hippocampus and medulla at 30 min and had
`almost completely worn off by 90 min. On the other
`hand, RA 15 showed a greater effect in the latter areas
`of the brain than in the cortex at 15 min, which
`became similar in them all at 30 min.
`At 60 min, RA6 (1 and 2.5 mg) caused similar
`degrees of inhibition in the cortex and hippocampus
`but the smaller dose had a much smaller effect in the
`medulla. The inhibition of enzyme, induced by RA7
`at 60 min, was dose-related and similar in all three
`regions.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Hypercapnia stimulates respiration by increasing
`the release of ACh from neurones in the medulla (Dev
`and Loeschcke, 1979; Metz, 1966). Acetylcholine,
`applied directly to this area (Miller, 1949) and cen(cid:173)
`trally acting cholinomimetics or anticholinesterases,
`administered parenterally, also stimulate respiration
`(Weinstock, 1981; Weinstock, Roll and Zilberman,
`1981 b). Conversely, narcotic analgesics are thought
`to depress respiration by inhibiting the release of
`ACh (Domino and Wilson, 1973), thereby reducing
`the sensitivity of the respiratory centre to C02
`(Florez, McCarthy and Borison, 1968). Since choli(cid:173)
`nomimetics and physostigmine have analgesic ac(cid:173)
`tivity, when given alone to experimental animals and
`man (Pleuvry and Tobias, 1971; Sitaram, Buchsbaum
`and Gillin, 1977) and, unlike naloxone, do not impair
`that of morphine, physostigmine was tested for its
`ability to reverse narcotic-induced respiratory de(cid:173)
`pression in post-operative patients (Weinstock et a/.,
`1982; Bourke, Rosenberg and Allen, 1984). A signifi(cid:173)
`cant but short-lived antagonism was observed in
`some but not in all subjects. Failure to obtain a
`consistent effect of adequate duration may have been
`
`Table 2. Activity of AChE in areas of the brain in rabbits injected
`with saline or morphine (JlM ACh hydrolysed/g/hr)
`Saline (8)
`Morphine (2)
`
`45 ± 2
`57± 4
`84±5
`
`40 ±4
`55± 5
`79±5
`
`• FIA7 (2mg)
`
`C\1
`
`100
`8 eo
`
`<(
`Q.
`
`~ 60
`~
`<( 40
`
`~
`
`'II.
`
`20
`
`0
`30
`
`D
`
`•
`
`..
`
`r • O.Q48
`
`p < 0.001
`
`+
`
`0
`
`A
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`4
`
`0
`
`+
`
`D
`
`60min
`FIA6 (2.15mg)
`60min
`FIA 15 (0.5mg)
`ao min
`I>HYS (0. 1 mg)
`30 min
`I>HYS.(O. 1 mg)
`15 m•n
`
`..
`• FIA6 (1mg)
`
`60min
`!'VI. 115 (0.5mg)
`30 min
`
`• FV>.7 (1mg)
`
`60mln
`
`%
`
`INHIBITION OF ACI-E
`
`Fig. 5. Relationship between the percentage increase in
`paC02, induced by a combination of morphine and anti(cid:173)
`ChEs, to the percentage inhibition of AChE in the medulla,
`at the time of maximum antagonism of the respiratory
`depression r = 0.962, P < 0.001.
`
`Area
`Cortex
`Hippocampus
`Medulla
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`Opiate antagonism by anticholinesterases
`
`1063
`
`Table 3. Inhibition of AChE by physostigmine and novel carbamates in different
`areas of the brain
`
`Percentage inhibition (±SE)
`
`Drug dose
`
`(mg/kg)
`
`Time
`
`(min)
`
`Physo (0.1)
`
`RAIS (0.5)
`
`RA6 (1.0)
`
`(2.5) S.C.
`
`RA7 (1.0)
`
`(2.0)
`
`15
`
`30
`
`90
`
`15
`
`30
`
`60
`
`60
`
`60
`
`60
`
`Cortex
`
`Hippocampus
`
`Medulla
`
`37.0± 3.4
`
`44.1 ±2.1
`
`44.0 ± 1.5
`
`35.3 ± 2.9
`
`55.0 ± 1.9°
`
`54.1 ± 4.5•
`
`17.0± 1.8
`
`40.2 ± 0.9
`
`10.0 ± 5.3
`59.9 ± u•
`
`16.5±5.1
`
`53.2 ± 1.9°
`
`40.0 ± 3.3
`
`38.2 ± 3.8
`
`39.2 ± 3.7
`
`62.5 ± 0.9
`
`56.8 ± 3.4
`
`38.8 ± 2.4°
`
`56.3 ± 2.6
`
`61.1 ± 3.4
`
`55.4 ± 1.0
`
`37.9 ± 6.8
`
`48.5 ± 2.6
`
`33.2 ±4.0
`
`66.1±3.9
`
`71.9 ± 4.6
`
`63.5 ± 3.1
`
`due to the short half-life of the drug (Giacobini,
`Somani, Mcllhany, Downen and Hallak, 1987) and
`its narrow therapeutic window (Christie eta/., 1981).
`In the present study, physostigmine (O.l mg/kg),
`administered together with morphine to rabbits, sig(cid:173)
`nificantly decreased the rise in paC02 for 30 min but
`intensified the reduction in blood pH and bradycar(cid:173)
`dia. The acidosis may have been due to production of
`lactic acid in muscle in response to stimulation of
`nicotinic receptors by the increased levels of ACh
`(Weinstock eta/., l98lb). Muscle fasciculations, of a
`small intensity, were seen at this dose in some of the
`rabbits and these became pronounced at 0.2 mg/kg.
`Physostigmine inhibited cholinesterase in plasma by
`a maximum of 40%, 5 min after injection, which
`rapidly declined to about 10% within 2 hr. Peak
`inhibition of AChE (54%) did not occur in the
`medulla until 30 min.
`All three novel carbamates produced a long-lasting
`antagonism of the respiratory depressant effect of
`morphine, with only very mild signs of peripheral
`cholinergic hyperactivity. This was minimized with
`RA6, through ensuring a slower absorption, by ad(cid:173)
`ministering the drug subcutaneously. In contrast to
`physostigmine, RA 7 completely prevented the respir(cid:173)
`atory depression from 30 to 180 min and also reduced
`the acidosis, bradycardia and hypotensive effect of
`morphine. This suggests that the degree of inhibition
`of AChE in the heart and skeletal muscle was
`relatively less with this drug than with physostigmine
`and that the increase in central cholinergic activity
`and resultant sympathetic stimulation, overcame
`the cardiovascular depressant effects of morphine
`(Weinstock, Zavadil, Chieuh and Kopin, 1979). The
`data agree with previous findings with RA7 in the rat,
`in which it was demonstrated that AChE was inhib(cid:173)
`ited, to a significantly greater extent in the brain, than
`in the heart and skeletal muscle (Weinstock et a/.,
`1986).
`
`Unlike reports with physostigmine in other species
`(Giacobini eta/., 1987; Hallak and Giacobini, 1986),
`there was no direct relationship between the degree of
`inhibition of cholinesterase in plasma in the rabbit
`and the amount of antagonism of the respiratory
`depression or of the severity of peripheral cholinergic
`side effects. Both RA6 and RA7 (l mg) showed only
`minimal antagonism of morphine and no cholinergic
`symptoms, in spite of more than 60% inhibition of
`cholinesterase in plasma, which lasted for at least
`I hr. In contrast, physostigmine only reduced the
`activity of cholinesterase by a maximum of 40%, for
`a few minutes but produced peripheral cholinergic
`symptoms and antagonism of morphine.
`A comparison of the relative degrees of inhibition
`by the four drugs in these areas of brain also revealed
`significant differences between them. While physo(cid:173)
`stigmine and RA 15 were more active in the hippo(cid:173)
`campus and medulla, RA6 (I mg) caused a greater
`inhibition in the cortex and hippocampus. This
`suggested that the drugs may either be distributed to
`these areas at different rates, or that the enzymes
`within these regions may show unequal sensitivity to
`the inhibitors. There is some evidence in favour of the
`former suggestion from the studies of Hallak and
`Giacobini (1986) and Giacobini et a/. (1987), who
`showed that the concentration of physostigmine in
`the brain of the rat varied considerably in different
`areas and this produced differences in the degrees of
`inhibition of AChE and in the resultant levels of
`ACh. It was also found that RA7 showed a greater
`inhibition in vitro, in solubilized preparations of
`AChE, prepared from the cortex and hippocampus,
`than from the striatum (Weinstock, Kay, Razin and
`Enz, 1987). This indicates that there may also be
`differences in the sensitivity of the enzymes to the
`antiChE agents in various regions of the brain.
`It was
`therefore most relevant
`to determine
`whether there was a direct relationship between the
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`1064
`
`ESTHER ELMALEM et a/.
`
`magnitude of the desired pharmacological effect, i.e.
`antagonism of the respiratory effect of morphine and
`the degree of inhibition of AChE in the area of the
`respiratory centre. A highly significant correlation
`was found for all 4 drugs between the prevention of
`the rise in paC02 by morphine and inhibition of
`AChE in the medulla. Moreover, it was found that
`the enzyme had to be inhibited by more than 40% in
`order to achieve any significant antagonism of the
`effects of morphine and that complete suppression of
`the respiratory depression by the opiate could be
`obtained at 60% inhibition.
`The findings in this study show that the novel
`carbamates may prove to be effective in combating
`somnolence and respiratory depression in human
`subjects receiving opiates, without causing any im·
`pairment of the analgesic activity. In view of their
`lower toxicity and smaller potential than physostig(cid:173)
`mine for causing inhibition of AChE in the heart and
`skeletal muscle, their use for the above purpose may
`also be relatively free of peripheral side effects.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Bourke J., Rosenberg M. and Allen P. 0. (1984) Physostig(cid:173)
`mine effectiveness as an antagonist of respiratory de(cid:173)
`pression and psychomotor effects caused by morphine or
`diazepam. Anesthesiology 61: 523-524.
`Christie J. E., Shering A., Ferguson J. and Glen A. I. M.
`(1981) Physostigmine and arecholine: effects of intra(cid:173)
`venous infusions in Alzheimer presenile dementia. Br. J.
`Psychiat. 138: 46-50.
`Dev N. B. and Loeschcke H. H. (1979) A cholinergic
`mechanism involved in the respiratory chemosensitivity of
`the medulla oblongata in the cat. Pjiugers Arch. 379:
`29-36.
`Domino E. F. and Wilson A. (1973) Effect of narcotic
`analgesic agonists and antagonists on rat brain acetyl(cid:173)
`choline. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 184: 18-32.
`Ellman G. L., Courtney R. D., Andres V. J. and Feather(cid:173)
`stone R. M. (1961) A new rapid colourimetric determi(cid:173)
`nation of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmac.
`7: 88-95.
`Florez J., McCarthy L. E. and Borison H. L. A. (1968) A
`comparative study in the cat of the respiratory effects of
`morphine injected intravenously and into
`the cere(cid:173)
`brospinal fluid. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 163: 448-455.
`Giacobini E., Somani S., Mcllhany M., Downen M. and
`Hallak M. (1987) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacody-
`
`namics of physostigmine after intravenous administration
`in beagle dogs. Neuropharmacology 26: 831-836.
`Hallak M. and Giacobini E. (1986) Relation of brain
`regional physostigmine concentration to cholinesterase
`activity and acetylcholine and choline levels in rat. Neuro(cid:173)
`chem. Res. 11: 1037-1048.
`Metz B. (1966) Hypercapnia and acetylcholine release
`from the cerebral cortex and medulla. J. Physiol. 186:
`321-332.
`Miller F. R. (1949) Effects of eserine and acetylcholine on
`respiratory centers and hypoglossal nuclei. Can. J. Res.
`27: 374-486.
`Pleuvry B. J. and Tobias M. A. (1971) Comparison of
`the antinoceptive activities of physostigmine, oxo(cid:173)
`tremorine and morphine in the mouse. Br. J. Pharmac. 43:
`706-714.
`Sitaram N., Buschbaum M. S. and Gillin J. C. (1977)
`Physostigmine analgesia and somatosensory evoked re(cid:173)
`sponses in man. Eur. J. Pharmac. 42: 285-291.
`Snir-Mor I., Weinstock M., Bahar M. and Davidson J. T.
`(1983) Physostigmine antagonizes morphine-induced res(cid:173)
`piratory depression in human subjects. Anesthesiology 59:
`6-9.
`Weinstock M. ( 1981) Activation of central muscarinic recep(cid:173)
`tors causes respiratory stimulation in conscious animals.
`J. Pharmac. 74: 587-592.
`Weinstock M., Davidson J. T., Rosin A. J. and Schnieden
`H. (1982) The effect of physostigmine on morphine-in(cid:173)
`duced post operative pain and somnolence. Br. J.
`Anaesth. 54: 429-434.
`Weinstock M., Erez E. and Roll D. (l98la) Antagonism of
`the cardiovascular and respiratory effect of morphine in
`the conscious rabbit by physostigmine. J. Pharmac. exp.
`Ther. 218: 504-508.
`Weinstock M., Kay G., Razin M. and Enz A. (1987)
`Selective inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and acetyl(cid:173)
`choline turnover in the cortex and hippocampus. In:
`International Symposium on Muscarinic Cholinergic
`Mechanisms (Cohen S. and Sokolovsky M., Eds),
`pp. 362-366. Freund, London.
`Weinstock M., Razin M., Chorev M. and Tashma Z. (1986)
`Pharmacological activity of novel anticholinesterase
`agents of potential use in the treatment of Alzheimer's
`Disease. In: Advances in Behavioral Biology (Fisher A.,
`Hanin I. and Lachman C., Eds), Vol. 29, pp. 539-549.
`Plenum Press, New York.
`Weinstock M., Roll D. and Zilberman Y. (l98lb) An
`analysis of the respiratory stimulant effect of physostig(cid:173)
`mine and neostigmine in the conscious rabbit. Clin. expl
`Pharmac. Physiol. 8: 151-158.
`Weinstock M., Zavadil A. P. III, Chieuh C. C. and Kopin
`I. J. (1979) The effect of oxotremorine on blood pressure
`and plasma catecholamines in conscious and anesthetized
`rats. Life Sci. 24: 301-310.
`
`Noven Ex. 1009
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket