throbber
Downloaded from
`
`jpet.aspetjournals.org
`
` by guest on July 2, 2014
`
`(Xt22.3.’(cid:1)65/8I/2I82.05(4$O2.00/t)
`(802-3565/81/2182-0504$02.0O/0
`THE JOURNAL OP PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
`THE
`JOURNAl.
`OF
`PHARMACOLOGY
`AND
`EXPERIMENTAL
`THERAPEUTICS
`Copyright (0 1981 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`Copyright
`© 1981
`by The American
`Society
`and Experimental
`TherapeutiCS
`Pharmacology
`for
`
`Vol.
`218, No.2
`Vol. 218, No. 2
`Printed in USA.
`Printed
`in U.S.A.
`
`Antagonism of the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Depressant
`Antagonism
`of
`the Cardiovascular
`and Respiratory
`Depressant
`Effects
`of Morphine
`in the Conscious
`Rabbit
`by Physostigmine1
`Effects of Morphine in the Conscious Rabbit by Physostigminel
`
`MARTA WEINSTOCK, ELI EREZ and DORON ROLL
`MARTA
`WEINSTOCK,
`ELI
`EREZ
`and
`DORON
`ROLL
`
`(M. W. , DR.)
`Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Hebrew University, Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel (M. W., D.R.)
`Department
`of Pharmacology
`and
`Experimental
`Therapeutics,
`Hebrew
`University,
`Hadassah
`School
`of Medicine,
`Jerusalem,
`Israel
`and Department of Anesthesia. Hadassah Hospital, Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel (E.E.)
`and
`Department
`of Anesthesia.
`Hadassah
`Hospital.
`Hadassah
`School
`of Medicine,
`Jerusalem,
`Israel
`(E.E.)
`
`Accepted for publication May 8, 1981
`Accepted
`May
`8,
`1981
`publication
`for
`
`ABSTRACT
`ABSTRACT
`Weinstock, Marta, Eli Erez and Doron Roll: Antagonism of the
`Marta,
`Eli Erez
`and Doron
`Roll: Antagonism
`of
`the
`Weinstock,
`cardiovascular and respiratory depressant effects of morphine
`cardiovascular
`and
`respiratory
`depressant
`effects
`of morphine
`in the conscious rabbit by physostigmine. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
`in the
`conscious
`rabbit
`by
`physostigmine.
`J. Pharmacol.
`Exp.
`Ther. 218: 504-508, 1981.
`218:
`Ther.
`504-508,
`1981.
`
`The influence of physostigmine was studied on the effect of
`The
`influence
`of
`physostigmine
`was
`studied
`on
`the
`effect
`of
`morphine on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in
`morphine
`on
`the
`cardiovascular
`and
`respiratory
`systems
`in
`conscious rabbits. Morphine (4 mg/kg i.v.) caused analgesia,
`conscious
`rabbits.
`Morphine
`(4 mg/kg
`iv.)
`caused
`analgesia,
`bradycardia, hypotension and respiratory depression, as indi-
`bradycardia,
`hypotension
`and
`respiratory
`depression,
`as mdi-
`cated by a fall in respiratory rate of 50%, a rise in blood Paco,
`cated
`by a fall
`in respiratory
`rate
`of 50%,
`a rise
`in blood
`Pac0,
`from 25.1 to 37.2 mm Hg and a fall in pH from 7.40 to 7.24.
`from
`25.1
`and
`a fall
`in pH from
`7.40
`to 7.24.
`to
`37.2
`mm Hg
`These effects lasted 2 to 3 hr and were completely antagonized
`These
`effects
`lasted
`2 to 3 hr and were
`completely
`antagonized
`by naloxone. Physostigmine (2.5 or 5 µg/kg/min) given by
`by
`naloxone.
`Physostigmine
`(2.5
`or
`5 (cid:1)g/kg/min)
`given
`by
`constant i.v. infusion did not significantly alter blood pressure
`constant
`i.v.
`infusion
`did
`not
`significantly
`alter
`blood
`pressure
`
`or heart rate, but decreased blood Paco, from 25.1 to 19 mm
`or
`heart
`rate,
`but
`decreased
`blood
`Paco2
`from
`25.1
`to
`1 9 mm
`Hg and increased pH from 7.40 to 7.46. Pretreatment of rabbits
`of
`rabbits
`Hg
`7.40
`to 7.46.
`Pretreatment
`and
`increased
`pH from
`with physostigmine (5 jug/kg/min) completely prevented both
`with
`physostigmine
`(5 (cid:1)tg/kg/min)
`completely
`prevented
`both
`the fall in blood pressure and blood pH and the rise in Paco,
`the
`fall
`in blood
`pressure
`and
`blood
`pH and
`the
`rise
`in Paco2
`induced by morphine (4 mg/kg) and also significantly reduced
`induced
`by morphine
`(4 mg/kg)
`and
`also
`significantly
`reduced
`both the intensity and duration of bradycardia. Analgesic activ-
`both
`the
`intensity
`and
`duration
`of bradycardia.
`Analgesic
`activ-
`ity of morphine remained unimpaired by physostigmine. Neo-
`of morphine
`remained
`unimpaired
`by
`physostigmine.
`Neo-
`ity
`stigmine (2.5 µg/kg/min) potentiated the bradycardia induced
`stigmine
`(2.5
`(cid:1)ig/kg/min)
`potentiated
`the
`bradycardia
`induced
`by morphine and did not antagonize its hypotensive and res-
`by morphine
`and
`did
`not
`antagonize
`its
`hypotensive
`and
`res-
`piratory depressant effects. The results support the hypothesis
`depressant
`effects.
`The
`results
`support
`the
`hypothesis
`piratory
`that the respiratory and cardiovascular depressant effects of
`that
`the
`respiratory
`and
`cardiovascular
`depressant
`effects
`of
`morphine, but not the analgesia, result from an inhibition of
`morphine,
`but
`not
`the
`analgesia,
`result
`from an
`inhibition
`of
`acetylcholine release from neurons in the central nervous sys-
`acetylcholine
`release
`from neurons
`in the
`central
`nervous
`sys-
`tem.
`tem.
`
`Injection of acetylcholine and other muscarinic agonists into
`Injection
`of
`acetylcholine
`and
`other
`muscarinic
`agonists
`into
`the lateral ventricle or cisterna magna of dogs and rats results
`lateral
`ventricle
`or
`cisterna
`magna
`of dogs
`and
`rats
`results
`the
`in a rise in blood pressure and tachycardia (Lang and Rush,
`in
`a
`rise
`in
`blood
`pressure
`and
`tachycardia
`(Lang
`and
`Rush,
`1973; Sinha et al., 1967; Krstic and Djurkovic, 1978). Hyperten-
`Sinha
`Krstic
`and
`Djurkovic,
`1978).
`Hyperten-
`et
`at.,
`1973;
`1967;
`sion also results from direct electrical stimulation of the vaso-
`also
`results
`from
`direct
`electrical
`stimulation
`of
`the
`vaso-
`sion
`motor areas in the medulla, and this can be prevented by
`motor
`areas
`in
`the
`medulla,
`and
`this
`can
`be
`prevented
`by
`hemicholinium (Sinha et al., 1967). Application of acetylcholine
`hemicholinium
`(Sinha
`Application
`of acetylcholine
`et at.,
`1967).
`to the floor of the 4th ventricle markedly increased respiration
`to
`the
`floor
`of
`the
`4th
`ventricle
`markedly
`increased
`respiration
`rate in decerebrate cats, pretreated with physostigmine (Miller,
`rate
`in decerebrate
`cats,
`pretreated
`with
`physostigmine
`(Miller,
`1949). These data suggest the presence of cholinergic stimula-
`1949).
`These
`data
`suggest
`the
`presence
`of
`cholinergic
`stimula-
`tory pathways to the vasomotor and respiratory centers.
`pathways
`to
`the
`vasomotor
`and
`respiratory
`centers.
`tory
`Morphine and related opiates can increase acetylcholine
`Morphine
`and
`related
`opiates
`can
`increase
`acetylcholine
`levels in the brain. This does not result from stimulation of
`levels
`in
`the
`brain.
`This
`does
`not
`result
`from
`stimulation
`of
`acetylcholine synthesis or from prevention of acetylcholine
`acetylcholine
`synthesis
`or
`from
`prevention
`of
`acetylcholine
`hydrolysis, but is most likely due to an inhibition of acetylcho-
`hydrolysis,
`but
`is most
`likely
`due
`to
`an
`inhibition
`of
`acetylcho-
`line release (Weinstock, 1971). Such an action has been dem-
`line
`release
`(Weinstock,
`1971).
`Such
`an
`action
`has
`been
`dem-
`onstrated for several opiate drugs in different areas of the
`onstrated
`for
`several
`opiate
`drugs
`in
`different
`areas
`of
`the
`central nervous system (Beleslin and Polak, 1965; Jhamandas
`central
`nervous
`system
`(Beleslin
`and
`Polak,
`1965;
`Jhamandas
`et a/., 1971; Domino and Wilson, 1973; Zsilla et al., 1976).
`Domino
`and
`Wilson,
`1973;
`Zsila
`et
`at.,
`1971;
`1976).
`et
`at.,
`Furthermore, morphine is known to produce effects such as
`Furthermore,
`morphine
`is
`known
`to
`produce
`effects
`such
`as
`respiratory depression, hypotension and bradycardia, which are
`depression,
`hypotension
`and
`bradycardia,
`which
`are
`respiratory
`the opposite to those caused by central cholinergic receptor
`the
`opposite
`to
`those
`caused
`by
`central
`cholinergic
`receptor
`
`Received
`for publication
`November
`Received for publication November 5, 1980.
`5,
`198().
`' This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant ROl DA
`I Thls
`work
`was
`supported
`b(cid:1)
`U.S.
`Public
`Health
`Service
`Grant
`ROl
`DA
`02150-01 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse.
`02150-01
`from
`the
`National
`Institute
`of Drug
`Abuse.
`
`stimulation. It therefore seemed reasonable to suggest that
`It
`therefore
`seemed
`reasonable
`to
`suggest
`that
`stimulation.
`these effects of morphine result from impairment of acetylcho-
`these
`effects
`of morphine
`result
`from
`impairment
`of
`acetylcho-
`line release.
`line
`release.
`Previous studies which have attempted to show a correlation
`Previous
`studies
`which
`have
`attempted
`to show
`a correlation
`between the cardiovascular or respiratory depressant effects of
`between
`the
`cardiovascular
`or
`respiratory
`depressant
`effects
`of
`morphine and acetylcholine release, have been carried out in
`and
`acetylcholine
`release,
`have
`been
`carried
`out
`in
`morphine
`anesthetized animals (Schaumann, 1958; Laubie et al., 1974).
`anesthetized
`animals
`(Schaumann,
`1958;
`Laubie
`1974).
`et
`al.,
`Anesthetic agents, particularly barbiturates, markedly interfere
`Anesthetic
`agents,
`particularly
`barbiturates,
`markedly
`interfere
`with central cholinergic activity as well as with respiratory
`with
`central
`cholinergic
`activity
`as well
`as with
`respiratory
`control (Bradley and Dray, 1973; Borison, 1971; Weinstock et
`control
`(Bradley
`and
`Dray,
`1973;
`Borison,
`1971; Weinstock
`et
`al., 1979).
`1979).
`at.,
`The present study was therefore carried out in conscious
`The
`present
`study
`was
`therefore
`carried
`out
`in
`conscious
`animals. These were pretreated with physostigmine, which
`animals.
`These
`were
`pretreated
`with
`physostigmine,
`which
`increases the amount of acetylcholine available for interaction
`increases
`the
`amount
`of
`acetylcholine
`available
`for
`interaction
`with its receptors by blocking acetylcholinesterase. If such
`with
`its
`receptors
`by
`blocking
`acetylcholinesteras#{232}.
`If
`such
`pretreatment were found to antagonize the cardiovascular and
`pretreatment
`were
`found
`to
`antagonize
`the
`cardiovascular
`and
`respiratory depressant actions of morphine, it would lend sup-
`respiratory
`depressant
`actions
`of morphine,
`it would
`lend
`sup-
`port to the suggestion that interference with cholinergic trans-
`port
`to
`the
`suggestion
`that
`interference
`with
`cholinergic
`trans-
`mission was involved in these effects of morphine.
`mission
`was
`involved
`in these
`effects
`of morphine.
`
`Methods
`Methods
`
`Measurement of cardiovascular and respiratory parameters.
`Measurement
`of
`cardiovascular
`and
`respiratory
`parameters.
`Male rabbits (mixed strain) weighing 2.5 to 3.5 kg were trained to sit
`Male
`rabbits
`(mixed
`strain)
`weighing
`2.5
`to 3.5
`kg were
`trained
`to
`sit
`quietly in a restraining box. Both ear arteries were cannulated with
`quietly
`in
`a
`restraining
`box.
`Both
`ear
`arteries
`were
`cannulated
`with
`transcutaneous catheters (Quick Cath. No. 20, Travenol Laboratories
`transcutaneous
`catheters
`(Quick
`Cath.
`No.
`20, Travenol
`Laboratories
`Ltd., Castlebar, Ireland) which were filled with sterile saline containing
`Ltd.,
`Castlebar,
`Ireland)
`which
`were
`filled with
`sterile
`saline
`containing
`
`ABBREVIATION:
`ABBREVIATION: ATMN, atropine methyl nitrate.
`ATMN,
`atropine
`methyl
`nitrate.
`
`504
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2046
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 1 of 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Physostigmine
`Antagonism
`of Morphine
`Physostigmine Antagonism of Morphine (cid:9)
`
`505
`505
`
`injection of 4 and 10 mg/kg of morphine respectively. The peak
`injection
`of 4 and
`10 mg/kg
`of morphine
`respectively.
`The
`peak
`hypotensive response (9.8 ± 2.2 and 12.4 ± 1.8 mm Hg) occurred
`hypotensive
`response
`(9.8 ± 2.2
`and
`12.4 ± 1.8 mm Hg)
`occurred
`20 to 30 min after injection of 2 and 4 mg/kg, respectively. The
`20
`to
`30 mm
`after
`injection
`of 2 and
`4 mg/kg,
`respectively.
`The
`response to 10 mg/kg of morphine was inconsistent, with some
`response’to
`10 mg/kg
`of morphine
`was
`inconsistent,
`with
`some
`rabbits displaying a rise of 5 to 10 mm Hg during the first 10
`rabbits
`displaying
`a
`rise
`of
`5 to
`10 mm
`Hg
`during
`the
`first
`10
`min and others, a small nonsignificant fall. Both the bradycardia
`mm and
`others,
`a small
`nonsignificant
`fall.
`Both
`the
`bradycardia
`and hypotensive response to 4 mg/kg of morphine lasted 2.5 to
`and
`hypotensive
`response
`to
`4 mg/kg
`of morphine
`lasted
`2.5
`to
`3 hr.
`3 hr.
`A dose of 4 mg/kg of morphine was therefore chosen for all
`A dose
`of
`4 mg/kg
`of morphine
`was
`therefore
`chosen
`for
`all
`subsequent experiments since it produced the most extensive
`subsequent
`experiments
`since
`it
`produced
`the
`most
`extensive
`and consistent vasodepression and bradycardia.
`and
`consistent
`vasodepression
`and
`bradycardia.
`Pretreatment with ATMN (0.5 mg/kg) completely prevented
`Pretreatment
`with
`ATMN
`(0.5 mg/kg)
`completely
`prevented
`the bradycardia and reduced the fall in blood pressure.
`bradycardia
`and
`reduced
`the
`in
`blood
`pressure.
`the
`fall
`Morphine (4 mg/kg) caused more than a 50% reduction in
`Morphine
`(4 mg/kg)
`caused
`more
`than
`a
`50% reduction
`in
`respiratory rate, which was associated with a 48% increase in
`respiratory
`rate,
`which
`was
`associated
`with
`a 48% increase
`in
`arterial Paco,. Blood pH was reduced from 7.40 to 7.24 (see fig.
`arterial
`Paco(cid:1).
`Blood
`pH was
`reduced
`from
`7.40
`to
`7.24
`(see
`fig.
`1). Maximum respiratory depression occurred between 30 and
`1). Maximum
`respiratory
`depression
`occurred
`between
`30
`and
`60 min after morphine administration and lasted 3 hr.
`60 mm
`after
`morphine
`administration
`and
`lasted
`3 hr.
`A considerable degree of analgesic activity was also seen at
`A considerable
`degree
`of
`analgesic
`activity
`was
`also
`seen
`at
`this dose level, 30 min after injection of morphine, with most of
`dose
`level,
`30 mm after
`injection
`of morphine,
`with
`most
`of
`this
`the rabbits failing to respond to the highest degree of pressure
`the
`rabbits
`failing
`to
`respond
`to
`the
`highest
`degree
`of pressure
`(table 1).
`(table
`1).
`Naloxone, given by continuous i.v. infusion at a dose of 0.1
`Naloxone,
`given
`by
`continuous
`i.v.
`infusion
`at
`a dose
`of
`0.1
`mg/min completely prevented all the above effects of morphine
`mg/mm
`completely
`prevented
`all
`the
`above
`effects
`of morphine
`(4 mg/kg) in four rabbits.
`(4 mg/kg)
`in
`four
`rabbits.
`Influence of anticholinesterase agents on actions of
`Influence
`of
`anticholinesterase
`agents
`on
`actions
`of
`
`MORPHINE (LmgIk(cid:1))
`0. MORPHINE (cid:9)
`o---..o
`/141
`•
`(2 S.s(cid:1)Ik(cid:1)Imui)
`•
`11111111111( It mg /110 • POYSOSTIS14111( I 2 SA/ kg/ ma I
`MOIPNII(
`(&wqIk(cid:1))
`A-..-.(cid:1).
`#{149}PWYSOS1I(cid:1)MII(
`I 50 jig/k,!
`•—• 141111111111( (tom / kg) • PNYSIST1111111E I SA tog/kg/ mut I
`I kg) #{149}PNYSISTISMIN(
`NORPNIU(
`ltmq
`#{163}-6
`mu)
`ep<O.05
`dep<OO1
`‘“pc000l
`.P4,antSf.
`• p<0.05 (cid:9)
`••• p <0 01 (cid:9)
`"' p<0 001 ; 14eAntS
`
`(cid:1)‘\
`
`120
`120
`110
`110
`100
`100
`90
`90
`▪ 110
`00
`g io
`70
`F• 60
`60
`so
`:(cid:1)
`50
`4,
`40
`40
`.Juo
`30
`40
`40
`
`705
`
`-(cid:1)35
`
`ES
`
`E 30
`
`30
`
`(cid:1)(cid:1)25(cid:1)’
`
`6 25
`
`1981
`1981
`
`25 Wm' of heparin. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded on a
`25 (cid:1)t/ml
`of heparmn.
`Blood
`pressure
`and
`heart
`rate
`were
`recorded
`on a
`Brush Gould recorder by means of a transducer attached to one arterial
`Brush
`Gould
`recorder
`by means
`of a transducer
`attached
`to one
`arterial
`cannula. Drugs were administered through a butterfly needle (no. 23)
`cannula.
`Drugs
`were
`administered
`through
`a
`butterfly
`needle
`(no.
`23)
`placed in a marginal ear vein. Physostigmine or neostigmine was infused
`placed
`in a marginal
`ear vein.
`Physostigmine
`or neostigmine
`was
`infused
`i.v. in a volume of 0.09 ml/min by means of a Harvard constant infusion
`i,v.
`in a volume
`of 0.09 mI/mis
`by means
`of a Harvard
`constant
`infusion
`pump.
`pump.
`Rectal temperature was monitored on a telethermometer (Yellow
`Rectal
`temperature
`(Yellow
`was
`monitored
`on
`a
`telethermometer
`Springs Instrument Company, Yellow Springs, OH) with the aid of a
`Yellow
`Springs,
`OH) with
`the
`aid
`of
`a
`Springs
`Instrument
`Company,
`thermistor probe inserted into the rectum. Respiration rate was counted
`probe
`inserted
`into
`the
`rectum.
`Respiration
`rate was
`counted
`thermistor
`visually and blood gases and pH were measured on Corning automatic
`visually
`blood
`gases
`pH were measured
`on Corning
`automatic
`and
`and
`blood gas analyzer after adjustment to the appropriate body tempera-
`analyzer
`after
`adjustment
`to the
`appropriate
`body
`tempera-
`gas
`blood
`ture.
`ture.
`Analgesia was assessed from the reaction (squeal or attempt at
`Analgesia
`was
`assessed
`from
`the
`reaction
`(squeal
`or
`attempt
`at
`withdrawal) in response to one of four grades of pressure applied to the
`withdrawal)
`in response
`to one
`of
`four
`grades
`of pressure
`applied
`to the
`tip of the tail with a sponge holder clamp. A score of 1 indicated a
`tip
`of
`the
`tail with
`a
`sponge
`holder
`clamp.
`A score
`of
`1 indicated
`a
`positive reaction to the lowest degree of pressure, whereas 5 denoted
`pressure,
`whereas
`5 denoted
`positive
`reaction
`to
`the
`lowest
`degree
`of
`that no reaction to the highest degree of pressure occurred.
`that
`no reaction
`to the
`highest
`degree
`of pressure
`occurred.
`Rabbits were allowed to rest for at least 1 hr under quiet conditions
`Rabbits
`were
`allowed
`to rest
`for
`at
`least
`1 hr
`under
`quiet
`conditions
`after cannulation, before control readings were taken. Drugs were not
`taken.
`Drugs
`were
`not
`after
`cannulation,
`before
`control
`readings
`were
`administered until two consistent values for blood gases were obtained.
`administered
`until
`two
`consistent
`values
`for blood
`gases
`were
`obtained.
`Mean arterial blood pressure, heart and respiration rates were deter-
`Mean
`arterial
`blood
`pressure,
`heart
`respiration
`rates
`were
`deter-
`and
`mined at 10-min intervals for 1 hr and then at 30-min intervals for 2 hr
`mined
`at
`10-mm
`intervals
`for
`for 2 hr
`1 hr
`and
`then
`at
`30-mm
`intervals
`after injection of morphine. Six rabbits were pretreated with ATMN
`after
`injection
`of morphine.
`rabbits
`were
`pretreated
`with
`ATMN
`Six
`(0.5 mg/kg i.v.) and then were given morphine (4 mg/kg) as above. In
`(0.5 mg/kg
`i.v.)
`then
`were
`given morphine
`(4 mg/kg)
`as
`above.
`In
`and
`other rabbits, physostigmine was infused at a concentration of either
`other
`rabbits,
`physostigmine
`was
`infused
`at
`a concentration
`of
`either
`2.5 (seven animals) or 5µg/kg/min (eight animals). Thirty minutes
`(seven
`animals)
`or
`5 (cid:1)zg/kg/min
`(eight
`animals).
`Thirty
`minutes
`2.5
`after commencement of the infusion, morphine was injected slowly
`after
`commencement
`of
`the
`infusion,
`morphine
`was
`injected
`slowly
`over a period of 2 to 3 min and the infusion of physostigmine continued
`over
`a period
`of 2 to 3 mm and
`the
`infusion
`of physostigmine
`continued
`(0.6 ml)
`for an additional 2 hrs. Blood samples (0.6 ml) for blood gas analysis
`for
`an
`additional
`2 hrs.
`Blood
`samples
`for
`blood
`gas
`analysis
`were taken at least twice before drug administration, 30 min after
`were
`taken
`at
`least
`twice
`before
`administration,
`30 mm after
`drug
`infusion of physostigmine, and at 30, 60 and 90 min after injection of
`infusion
`of physostigmine,
`and
`90 mm after
`injection
`of
`and
`at
`30,
`60
`morphine. The volume of blood taken was replaced each time with an
`morphine.
`The
`volume
`of blood
`taken
`was
`replaced
`each
`time with
`an
`equal volume of sterile saline. In five rabbits, neostigmine (2.5 µg/kg/
`equal
`volume
`of
`sterile
`saline.
`In five
`rabbits,
`neostigmine
`(2.5 (cid:1)sg/kg/
`min) was infused for 30 min and then continued after injection of
`mm)
`was
`infused
`for
`30
`and
`then
`continued
`after
`injection
`of
`mm
`morphine (4 mg/kg). Blood pressure, heart and respiration rates and
`morphine
`(4 mg/kg).
`Blood
`pressure,
`heart
`and
`respiration
`rates
`and
`blood gases were measured as above. In six other rabbits, ATMN (0.5
`blood
`gases
`were measured
`as
`above.
`In six
`other
`rabbits,
`ATMN
`(0.5
`mg/kg), or in four animals, hyoscine (10 mg/kg), was given, 15 min
`mg/kg),
`or
`in
`four
`animals,
`hyoscine
`(10 mg/kg),
`was
`given,
`15 mm
`before the infusion of physostigmine, 5 µg/kg/min.
`before
`the
`infusion
`of physostigmine,
`5 (cid:1)sg/kg/min.
`In four rabbits, naloxone was infused i.v. at a concentration of 0.1
`In
`four
`rabbits,
`naloxone
`infused
`iv.
`at
`a concentration
`was
`of
`0.1
`mg/kg/min for 15 min before and for 90 min after injection of 4 mg/kg
`for
`90 mm after
`injection
`of 4 mg/kg
`15 mm
`before
`and
`mg/kg/mm
`for
`of morphine. Blood pressure, heart and respiration rates were recorded
`pressure,
`heart
`and
`respiration
`rates
`were
`recorded
`of morphine.
`Blood
`as described above.
`as
`described
`above.
`Estimation of plasma cholinesterase. Blood (0.3-0.5 ml) was
`Estimation
`of
`plasma
`cholinesterase.
`Blood
`ml)
`was
`(0.3-0.5
`withdrawn into a heparinized syringe during the predrug control period
`a heparirnzed
`syringe
`during
`the
`predrug
`control
`period
`withdrawn
`into
`and at 30 and 60 min after commencement of physostigmine infusion
`and
`at
`30 and
`60 mm
`after
`commencement
`of physostigmine
`infusion
`(i.e., 30 min after morphine injection). The blood was centrifuged
`30 mm
`after
`morphine
`injection).
`The
`blood
`was
`centrifuged
`(i.e.,
`immediately for 10 min at 1000 x g and cholinesterase activity of the
`immediately
`for
`10 mm at
`and
`cholinesterase
`activity
`the
`x
`g
`of
`1000
`plasma was measured within 10 min by the method of Ellman et al.
`plasma
`was measured
`10 mm by
`the method
`of Eliman
`et at.
`within
`(1961). Drugs used were: ATMN, hyoscine hydrobromide, neostigmine
`(1961).
`Drugs
`used were:
`ATMN,
`hyoscine
`hydrobromide,
`neostigmine
`hydrobromide and physostigmine salicylate (Sigma Chemical Com-
`hydrobromide
`physostigmine
`salicylate
`(Sigma
`Chemical
`Corn-
`and
`pany, St. Louis, MO); morphine hydrochloride (U.S. Vitamins Labo-
`pany,
`St.
`Louis,
`MO);
`morphine
`hydrochloride
`(U.S.
`Vitamins
`Labo-
`ratories Division, Tuckahoe, NY); and naloxone hydrochloride (Endo
`ratories
`Division,
`Tuckahoe,
`NY);
`and
`naloxone
`hydrochloride
`(Endo
`Laboratories, Inc., Garden City, NY). Morphine and physostigmine
`Laboratories,
`Inc.,
`Garden
`City,
`NY).
`Morphine
`physostigmine
`and
`were made up freshly for each experiment in sterile saline which
`were
`made
`up
`freshly
`for
`each
`experiment
`in
`sterile
`saline
`which
`included an equal weight of ascorbic acid to prevent oxidation. All
`included
`an
`equal
`weight
`of
`ascorbic
`acid
`to
`prevent
`oxidation.
`All
`doses are expressed in milligrams per kilogram of body weight of the
`doses
`are
`expressed
`in milligrams
`per
`body
`weight
`of
`the
`kilogram
`of
`appropriate salt.
`appropriate
`salt.
`Statistical analysis. Tests of significance for the difference between
`Statistical
`analysis.
`Tests
`ofsignificance
`for
`the
`difference
`between
`means were performed by a two-tailed Student's t test for paired or
`a two-tailed
`Student’s
`test
`for
`paired
`or
`means
`were
`performed
`by
`t
`unpaired data as indicated in "Results".
`unpaired
`data
`as
`indicated
`in “Results”.
`
`\
`
`‘.\
`
`ii
`
`‘ii
`
`-‘
`
`I’
`
`7.5
`
`74
`
`!
`
`73
`
`J.
`
`30
`
`60
`
`9(cid:1)O
`
`7.2
`0
`
`30 (cid:9)
`30
`
`60
`60
`
`90
`90
`
`‘------
`
`-
`
`------
`
`110
`:(cid:1)u11o(cid:1)___
`
`100
`6 100
`
`.(cid:1)
`
`•
`(cid:1).90
`
`00
`
`‘-(cid:1)(cid:1)-
`
`Of •
`
`I
`
`•
`
`I
`
`60
`60
`
`90
`90
`
`20
`▪ 20
`O
`ic(cid:1)’
`a 15
`
`0 (cid:9)
`0
`
`I
`30 (cid:9)
`30
`
`.(cid:1)
`
`▪ AO
`00
`0
`2
`,(cid:1)
`I
`70 0
`90 (cid:9)
`60 (cid:9)
`30
`90
`60
`0
`30
`Time after Injection of Morphine
`Injection
`Time
`of Morphine
`alter
`Imini
`(mini
`
`‘(cid:1)
`
`1 . The
`effect
`of physostigmine
`Fig. 1. The effect of physostigmine pretreatment on the respiratory
`pretreatment
`Fig.
`the
`respiratory
`on
`depression induced by morphine.
`depression
`induced
`by morphine.
`
`TABLE
`TABLE 1
`1
`The
`effect
`of physostigmine
`on analgesic
`ac tivity
`of morphine
`The effect of physostigmine on analgesic activity of morphine
`
`Analgesic
`Analgesic
`Score ±
`Score
`± S E M
`1.38 ± 0.13
`1 .38

`0.13
`4.55 ± 0.24
`4.55

`0.24
`1.71 ± 0.28
`1.71

`0.28
`
`4.91 ± 0.08
`4.91

`0.08
`
`N
`N
`
`21
`21
`9
`7
`
`9 7
`
`12
`12
`
`Results
`Results
`
`Effect of morphine on blood pressure, heart rate, res-
`Effect
`of morphine
`on
`blood
`pressure,
`heart
`rate,
`res-
`piration and pain threshold. Intravenous injection of mor-
`piration
`and
`pain
`threshold.
`Intravenous
`injection
`of mor-
`phine (2 mg/kg) caused significant bradycardia (reduction of
`phine
`(2 mg/kg)
`caused
`significant
`bradycardia
`(reduction
`of
`72 ± 10 beats/min) within 5 min, whereas 1 mg/kg only reduced
`10 beats/mm)
`within
`5 mm,
`whereas
`1 mg/kg
`only
`reduced
`72

`heart rate by 30 ± 9 beats at 60 min. Reductions in heart rate
`heart
`rate
`by
`30 ± 9 beats
`at
`60 mm.
`Reductions
`in
`heart
`rate
`of 108 ± 12 and 102 ± 10 beats/min occurred 5 to 30 min after
`of
`108 ± 12 and
`102 ± 10 beats/mm
`occurred
`5 to
`30 mm
`after
`
`Treatment
`Treatment
`
`Control
`Control
`Morphine (4 mg/kg)
`Morphine
`(4 mg/kg)
`Physostigmine (5 µg/kg/
`Physostigmine(5(cid:1)tg/kg/
`min, 30 min)
`mm,
`30 mm)
`Physostigmine(5(cid:1)g/kg/
`Physostigmine (5 µg/kg/
`min, 30 min) + morphine
`mm,
`30 mm)
`+ morphine
`(4 mg/kg)
`(4 mg/kg)
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2046
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 2 of 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`(cid:1)
`

`

`Vol. 218
`Vol. 218
`
`depression by physostigmine (5 pg/kg/min) (see table 3). It
`depression
`by
`physostigmine
`(5
`(cid:1)tg/kg/imn)
`(see
`table
`3).
`It
`only antagonized the salivation, miosis and defecation induced
`only
`antagonized
`the
`salivation,
`miosis
`and
`defecation
`induced
`by physostigmine. On the other hand, hyoscine, 10 mg/kg, both
`by
`physostigmine.
`On
`the
`other
`hand,
`hyoscine,
`10 mg/kg,
`both
`increased the respiratory depressant effect of morphine alone
`increased
`the
`respiratory
`depressant
`effect
`of morphine
`alone
`(Pco, at 30 min after morphine, 40 ± 1.2) and completely
`(Pco.
`at
`30 min
`after
`morphine,
`40

`1.2)
`and
`completely
`antagonized the prevention by physostigmine of the respiratory
`antagonized
`the
`prevention
`by
`physostigmine
`ofthe
`respiratory
`depressant effect of morphine (see table 3).
`table
`3).
`depressant
`effect
`of morphine
`(see
`Neostigmine (2.5 µg/kg/min) inhibited plasma cholinesterase
`Neostigmine
`(2.5
`jig/kg/mm)
`inhibited
`plasma
`cholinesterase
`by 80%, but it did not diminish the respiratory depressant effect
`80(cid:1),
`but
`it did
`not
`diminish
`the
`respiratory
`depressant
`effect
`by
`of morphine, nor did it alter significantly the hypotensive
`of morphine,
`nor
`did
`it
`alter
`significantly
`the
`hypotensive
`response. However, it markedly potentiated the cardiac slowing
`However,
`it markedly
`potentiated
`the
`cardiac
`slowing
`response.
`induced by morphine, reducing heart rate to 90 ± 8.0 beats/
`induced
`by morphine,
`reducing
`heart
`rate
`to
`90

`8.0
`beats/
`min, 5 to 10 min after morphine (4 mg/kg). Neostigmine (5 Itg/
`mm,
`5 to
`10 mm
`after
`morphine
`(4 mg/kg).
`Neostigmine
`(5 (cid:1).tg/
`kg/min) caused marked fasciculations and cardiac arrest in
`kg/mm)
`caused
`marked
`fasciculations
`and
`cardiac
`arrest
`in
`three animals when morphine was injected.
`three
`animals
`when
`morphine
`was
`injected.
`
`Discussion
`Discussion
`
`Intravenous injection of morphine in cats, dogs and man
`Intravenous
`injection
`of morphine
`in
`cats,
`dogs
`and
`man
`produces an initial hypotensive response which is mainly due
`produces
`an
`initial
`hypotensive
`response
`which
`is mainly
`due
`to histamine release (Feldberg and Paton, 1951; Evans et al.,
`to
`histamine
`release
`(Feldberg
`and
`Paton,
`1951;
`Evans
`et
`at.,
`
`a(.ne
`Morphine Ili mg / kg) atone
`Morphine
`(4mqIk(cid:1))
`o----o
`(2.5sqlkglmm)
`+ Morphine
`Pliysostigmlne
`.-• (cid:9)
`Physostigmlne (2.5,11k61min) + Morphine
`A-.-A
`(5.0 sc Ik(cid:1)lw#{225}n)+ Morphine
`Physostigmine
`a--a Physostigmim (5.0 m Iklimin) + Morphine
`#{163}-&
`*ft (cid:9)
`**
`*5
`*0
`
`+0
`
`_4:74*II
`
`-----
`
`•,6
`
`T
`
`sst4 ----
`
`*
`
`oi
`0l
`
`E
`E
`
`-12
`
`0
`
`- 20
`
`-40
`
`- 60
`
`Oi
`
`- 80
`
`-100
`
`CHANGE IN MABP
`
`z’-
`
`U L
`
`u
`
`0(cid:1)
`
`4
`
`z.(cid:1)
`-l(cid:1)
`
`z U
`
`-120
`120
`0 5 10 20 310
`60
`05102030
`60
`TIME
`AFTER
`INJECTION
`OF MORPHINE
`TIME AFTER INJECTION OF MORPHINE
`(m in )
`(mm)
`The
`effect
`of physostigmine
`pretreatment
`on hypotension
`and
`Fig. 2. The effect of physostigmine pretreatment on hypotension and
`mean
`arterial
`blood
`pres-
`bradycardia induced by morphine. MABP, mean arterial blood pres-
`bradycardia
`induced
`by morphine.
`MABP,
`sure.
`sure.
`
`Fig.
`
`2.
`
`506 (cid:9)
`506
`
`Weinstock
`et al.
`Weinstock et al.
`
`30 mmby
`
`morphine. Intravenous injection of physostigmine in doses of
`morphine.
`Intravenous
`injection
`of
`physostigmine
`in
`doses
`of
`0.05 to 0.2 mg/kg resulted in biphasic effects on blood pressure
`0.05
`to
`0.2 mg/kg
`resulted
`in biphasic
`effects
`on
`blood
`pressure
`and heart rate, which lasted 20 to 30 min, depending on the
`and
`heart
`rate,
`which
`lasted
`20
`to
`30 mm,
`depending
`on
`the
`dose. An initial phase of bradycardia and hypotension was
`dose.
`An
`initial
`phase
`of
`bradycardia
`and
`hypotension
`was
`followed by a longer phase of hypertension and return of heart
`followed
`by
`a longer
`phase
`of hypertension
`and
`return
`of heart
`rate to normal values. Since one could not study the cardiovas-
`rate
`to
`normal
`values.
`Since
`one
`could
`not
`study
`the
`cardiovas-
`cular effects of morphine in the presence of continuously chang-
`cular
`effects
`ofmorphine
`in the
`presence
`ofcontinuously
`chang-
`ing and short-lived effects of physostigmine, it was decided to
`and
`short-lived
`effects
`of
`physostigmine,
`it was
`decided
`to
`ing
`give physostigmine as a continuous i.v. infusion. When admin-
`give
`physostigmine
`as
`a
`continuous
`iv.
`infusion.
`When
`admin-
`istered in this way at a concentration of 2.5 or 5 µg/kg/min,
`istered
`in
`this
`way
`at
`a
`concentration
`of
`2.5
`or
`5 (cid:1)tg/kg/min,
`physostigmine caused no significant change in either heart rate
`physostigmine
`caused
`no
`significant
`change
`in either
`heart
`rate
`or blood pressure over a period of 2 hr (table 2). Both doses of
`or
`blood
`pressure
`over
`a period
`of 2 hr
`(table
`2). Both
`doses
`of
`physostigmine caused miosis and some salivation and defeca-
`and
`some
`salivation
`and
`defeca-
`physostigmine
`caused
`miosis
`tion 20 to 40 min after commencement of the infusion. The
`tion
`20
`to
`40 mm
`after
`commencement
`of
`the
`infusion.
`The
`effects occurred earlier and were more pronounced with the
`effects
`occurred
`earlier
`and
`were
`more
`pronounced
`with
`the
`higher dose.
`higher
`dose.
`Both concentrations markedly stimulated respiration, result-
`Both
`concentrations
`markedly
`stimulated
`respiration,
`result-
`ing in an increase in blood pH and a 20 to 25% decrease in
`in
`an
`increase
`in
`blood
`pH
`and
`a
`20
`to
`25% decrease
`in
`ing
`Paco, within 30 min of commencement of the infusion (table 2;
`Paco,
`within
`30 mm
`of
`commencement
`of
`the
`infusion
`(table
`2;
`fig. 1). Plasma cholinesterase was inhibited by 48.4 and 55.3%
`fig.
`1).
`Plasma
`cholinesterase
`was
`inhibited
`by
`48.4
`and
`55.3%
`at 30 min by physostigmine, 2.5 and 5 µg/kg/min, respectively.
`at
`physostigmine,
`2.5
`and
`5 jig/kg/mm,
`respectively.
`There was no significant additional inhibition of plasma cholin-
`There
`was
`no
`significant
`additional
`inhibition
`of plasma
`cholin-
`esterase at either dose of physostigmine at 60 min. Slight muscle
`esterase
`at
`either
`dose
`of physostigmine
`at
`60 mm.
`Slight
`muscle
`fasciculations were only evident 2 hr after continuous infusion
`fasciculations
`were
`only
`evident
`2 hr
`after
`continuous
`infusion
`of the larger dose. In four other rabbits given physostigmine
`of
`the
`larger
`dose.
`In
`four
`other
`rabbits
`given
`physostigmine
`(10 µg/kg/min), considerable salivation and defecation occurred
`(10 (cid:1)ig/kg/min),
`considerable
`salivation
`and
`defecation
`occurred
`within 30 min and muscle fasciculations appeared 40 to 60 min
`within
`30 min
`and
`muscle
`fasciculations
`appeared
`40
`to
`60 mm
`after commencement of the infusion. This dose was therefore
`after
`commencement
`of
`the
`infusion.
`This
`dose
`was
`therefore
`not given together with morphine.
`not
`given
`together
`with
`morphine.
`When physostigmine infusion (2.5 or 5 p.g/kg/min) was given
`When
`physostigmine
`infusion
`(2.5
`or
`5 jig/kg/mm)
`given
`was
`for 30 min and then continued after the injection of morphine
`30 mm
`and
`then
`continued
`after
`the
`injection
`of morphine
`for
`(4 mg/kg), it completely prevented the fall in blood pressure.
`(4 mg/kg),
`it
`completely
`prevented
`the
`fall
`in
`blood
`pressure.
`The bradycardia was not significantly altered by the lower dose
`The
`bradycardia
`was
`not
`significantly
`altered
`by
`the
`lower
`dose
`of physostigmine, but it was reduced both in intensity and
`of
`physostigmine,
`but
`it was
`reduced
`both
`in
`intensity
`and
`duration after administration of 5 µg/kg/min of the anticholin-
`duration
`after
`administration
`of 5 (cid:1)tg/kg/min
`of
`the
`anticholin-
`esterase (see fig. 2).
`esterase
`(see
`fig.
`2).
`Pretreatment with physostigmine (2.5 µg/kg/min) markedly
`Pretreatment
`with
`physostigmine
`(2.5
`(cid:1)tg/kg/min)
`markedly
`diminished the elevation in Paco, which occurred after admin-
`diminished
`the
`elevation
`in Paco,
`which
`occurred
`after
`admin-
`istration of morphine (4 mg/kg). It also reduced significantly
`(4 mg/kg).
`It
`also
`reduced
`significantly
`istration
`of morphine
`the fall in blood pH, respiration rate and Pao, 60 min after
`the
`in
`blood
`pH,
`respiration
`rate
`and
`Pao2
`60 mm
`after
`fall
`morphine (see fig. 1). After pretreatment with physostigmine
`morphine
`(see
`fig.
`1). After
`pretreatment
`with
`physostigmine
`(5 µg/kg/min), morphine no longer caused any significant
`(5
`(cid:1)tg/kg/min),
`morphine
`no
`longer
`caused
`any
`significant
`change in blood Paco, pH or Pao, and the fall in respiratory
`change
`in
`blood
`Pa(-o,,
`pH
`or
`Pao.
`and
`the
`fall
`in
`respiratory
`rate was greatly diminished (see table 3).
`rate
`was
`greatly
`diminished
`(see
`table
`3).
`Pretreatment of rabbits with ATMN (0.5 mg/kg) did not
`Pretreatment
`of
`rabbits
`with
`ATMN
`(0.5
`mg/kg)
`did
`not
`significant

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket