throbber
NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`
`J Neural Transm (1994) [Suppl] 43: 219-225
`© Springer-Verlag 1994
`
`Pharmacological evaluation of phenyl-carbamates as eNS-selective
`acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
`
`M. Weinstock\ M. Razin\ M. Chore~, and A. Enz3
`Departments of 1 Pharmacology and 2 Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy,
`Hebrew University Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
`3 Department of Preclinical Research, Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basle, Switzerland
`
`Summary. The pharmacological and clinical properties of a novel phenyl
`carbamate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, SDZ ENA 713 are
`described. In animals and human subjects this compound showed superior
`chemical stability, oral bioavailability and a longer duration of action than
`physostigmine. SDZ ENA 713 produced a lO-fold greater inhibition of
`AChE in the hippocampus and cortex than in the heart and skeletal muscle,
`which explains its relatively low toxicity and freedom from cholinergic side
`effects. The selective effect in the cortex and hippocampus may be due to its
`preferential inhibition of the G1 form of the enzyme, which is present in
`relatively higher concentrations in these brain areas. Evidence of a selective
`hippocampal action was obtained in normal human subjects in whom REM
`sleep density was increased at doses that had no effect on plasma cholin(cid:173)
`esterase. If memory impairments in AD are related to a lack of cholinergic
`activity in cortical and hippocampal brain areas, SDZ ENA 713 should
`produce significant symptomatic improvement.
`
`Introduction
`
`Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is a severe degenerative disorder in which there
`is selective damage to neurons in the forebrain and hippocampus (White(cid:173)
`house et al., 1981). Although this results in significant changes in several
`neurotransmitters, the reduction in the number of cholinergic neurons and
`in choline acetyl-transferase, correlates best with the memory impairment
`(Sims and Bowen, 1983). Anticholinergic drugs also cause memory dis(cid:173)
`turbances and produce some of the symptoms of early dementia in normal
`human subjects (Drachmann and Leavitt, 1974). Thus, in the absence of a
`more specific treatment for AD, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors
`have been tested in this and other forms of dementia in the hope that they
`would increase cholinergic transmission in the affected brain areas and
`improve cognitive function. In one study, which reported some beneficial
`effect with physostigmine, the extent of the improvement was correlated
`
`1
`
`~
`i
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`220
`
`M. Weinstock et al.
`
`with the degree of cholinesterase inhibition in the spinal fluid and thus to
`the amount of the drug reaching the CNS (ThaI et aI., 1983). However, the
`narrow therapeutic window, unpredictable oral bioavailability and high
`incidence of side effects of physostigmine, resulting mainly from peripheral
`cholinergic hyperactivity (Christie et aI., 1981), prompted the search for
`safer AChE inhibitors with a more selective effect in the CNS.
`
`Derivatives of N-N-dimethylamino-ethyl-phenyl carbamate
`
`For this purpose we prepared a series of N-monoalkyl and N,N-dialkyl
`derivatives of m-[1-(N,N-dimethylamino)-ethyl] phenyl carbamate, many of
`which are more lipid soluble and show greater chemical stability than
`physostigmine (Weinstock et aI., 1986). Their inhibitory activity was evalu(cid:173)
`ated in vitro on a purified preparation of human erythrocyte AChE, and on
`whole brain AChE after subcutaneous injection to mice. The concentration
`of each drug that would inhibit by 50% the activity of the enzyme prepara(cid:173)
`tion was determined by the method of Ellman et a1. (1961). From ex vivo
`measurements, the dose of each drug was also computed that would block
`total brain enzyme activity by 50% (ED so) , when this reached its peak after
`injection (Weinstock et aI., 1986, 1992). The most potent inhibitors of the
`human erythrocyte enzyme were the mono- and dimethyl derivatives.
`Increasing the length of the alkyl chain to ethyl resulted in an 80-fold
`reduction in inhibitory potency in both mono- and di-alkyl derivatives. This
`was gradually restored in the former, to values similar to that of the methyl
`derivative, as the chain lengthened from n-propyl, through n-butyl to n(cid:173)
`hexy1. In general, this relationship between chemical structure and anti(cid:173)
`AChE potency was maintained in the whole animal, the exception being the
`I-isomer of the methyl-ethyl derivative, SDZ ENA 713, (formerly RA7,
`Weinstock et aI., 1986) which was about 10 times more potent in vivo than
`would be expected from its activity on red cell AChE (Weinstock et aI.,
`"1 aG-"';
`t ~,' ,/ ."::'/ "
`
`~~ .
`
`Acute toxicity of phenylcarbamates
`
`Acute toxicity was assessed after sc. injection of the carbamates in mice.
`Therapeutic ratios (LDso/EDso) were derived, where LDso is the dose that
`is lethal in 50% of mice. The monomethyl, dimethyl and methyl-ethyl der(cid:173)
`ivatives were the least toxic. Increasing the chain length, or introduction of
`a branched chain, e.g. isopropyl or sec-butyl resulted in greater toxicity
`(Weinstock et aI., 1992).
`Death from overdose of anti-AChE is due to respiratory arrest, which
`itself results from a combination of excessive stimulation of muscarinic
`receptors in the respiratory centre in the brainstem and paralysis of the
`respiratory muscles (depolarization blockade via nicotinic receptors)
`(Machne and Unna, 1963). The former can be prevented by the admini-
`
`I.,
`
`1 y
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`SDZ ENA-713, a CNS-selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
`
`221
`
`ATROPINE PROTECTION IN MICE
`
`12
`
`9
`
`6
`
`ENA 713
`
`I:::=J monosub.
`mm branched
`
`_ disub.
`
`C1 C2 C3 C4 C6 C3 C4 C6 C1 C2 C3 C4
`
`LENGT H OF SIDE CHAIN
`
`Fig. 1. Increase in LDso of SDZ ENA 713 by pretreatment of mice with atropine.
`Ordinate: Ratio of LDso in the presence and absence of atropine (S mg/kg) Abcissa:
`No. of C atoms in alkyl substituent on carbamate. Open columns: monosubstitued;
`filled columns: disubstituted; crossed hatched columns; branched side chain. * SDZ
`ENA 713
`
`stration of a centrally-active muscanmc antagonist such as atropine or
`scopolamine. On the other hand, muscle paralysis cannot be antagonised
`by drugs. The relative contributions of excess central muscarinic receptor
`stimulation and muscle paralysis towards the lethal effects of anti-AChE
`were assessed by comparing the acute toxicity of the phenyl carbamates
`with and without pretreatment by atropine (5 mg/kg). Muscarinic receptor
`blockade resulted in a 2-3.5-fold increase in LD50 in physostigmine and in
`all the mono-alkyl and branched-chain derivatives. This rose to 5-6-fold
`in the dimethyl, methyl-propyl and methyl-butyl derivatives and to 12-fold
`in the methyl-ethyl ~Omp0Ui.id, SDZ ENA 713 (Fig. 1). This finding sug(cid:173)
`gested that SDZ ENZ 713 inhibited brain AChE at much lower dose levels
`that those needed to paralyse the respiratory muscles and was therefore a
`potentially much safer drug than the other derivatives or physostigmine.
`
`AChE inhibition in different regions of rat brain
`
`After oral administration to rats, SDZ ENA 713 caused a preferential
`inhibition of AchE in the cortex and hippocampus, in comparison with
`other brain regions. This is shown in Fig. 2. The relatively weak inhibition
`in the heart and skeletal muscle, that was suggested by the atropine pro(cid:173)
`tection experiment, can readiliy be seen in the same animals (Table 1). In
`contrast, physostigmine inhibited the enzyme in all brain areas and in the
`periphery at similar doses. Direct measurements of the concentrations of
`ACh produced in the CNS by increasing doses of SDZ ENA 713, also
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`222
`
`M. Weinstock et al.
`
`ACh LEVELS IN RAT BRAIN
`AFTER ENA 7 13 P.O.
`
`60
`
`50
`
`-l
`
`W >
`~
`..c o «
`z
`
`t75 « w a:
`~
`
`-er- Cortex
`
`·--0--- Hippocampus
`
`--w-- StriatLm
`
`DOSE (umoles/kg p.o.)
`
`Fig. 2. Inhibition of AChE in different regions of rat brain by SDZ ENA 713. Brains
`were removed 30 min after oral administration of the drug or saline. Inhibition of
`AChE represented as % of value in saline treated controls
`
`EX VIVO AChE INHIBITION
`IN RAT BRAIN REGIONS
`
`w
`<5 «
`LL o
`Z o
`i=
`ill
`I
`z
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`-er- Cortex
`
`---0--- Hippocampus
`
`--"'-- Pons/medJlla
`
`--w-- StriatLm
`
`OL---'---'.....-=:~...J-~~~ ......... _~
`0.1
`10
`
`DOSE (umoles/kg P.o)
`
`Fig. 3. Increase in acetylcholine levels in different brain regions by SDZ ENA 713.
`Measurements were made 30 min after oral administration of the drug or saline. Levels
`of acetylcholine expressed as a % of saline control
`
`confirmed a preferential increase in the cortex and hippocampus, which
`correlated well with the AChE inhibition (Fig. 3).
`The reason for the relatively greater inhibition of AChE in the cortex
`and hippocampus than in the striatum or medulla is not yet clear. However,
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`
`SDZ ENA-713, a CNS-selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
`
`223
`
`Table 1. AChE inhibition ex vivo in rat by physostigmine
`and SDZ ENA 713
`
`Brain region or organ
`
`Physostigmine
`ICso (J.1moles/kg)
`
`SDZ ENA 713
`ICso (J.1moles/kg)
`
`Cortex
`Hippocampus
`Pons/medulla
`Striatum
`Heart
`Skeletal muscle
`
`1.20
`1.31
`1.44
`1.25
`1.23
`1.26
`
`2.69
`3.89
`7.21
`7.12
`38.4
`32.7
`
`Table 2. Inhibition of AChE forms in human cortex
`
`Inhibitor
`
`G4 from
`ICsoJ.1M
`
`G1 from
`ICsoJ.1M
`
`G4/G1
`
`SDZENA 713
`Physostigmine
`Tacrine
`
`13.3 ± 1.7
`0.041 ± 0.003
`0.97 ± 0.07
`
`3.15 ± 0.42
`0.037 ± 0.004
`1.02 ± 0.13
`
`4.2
`1.1
`0.9
`
`it is known that AChE exists in multiple molecular forms, which have
`similar catalytic activity (Massoulie and Bon, 1982). The globular tetrameric
`from (G4) and the monomeric form (G1), which sediment in a sucrose
`gradient with coefficients of approximately lOS and 4S respectively, are the
`predominant forms in human and rat brain. The proportion of these two
`forms varies in different brain areas. In human brain, G1 makes up less
`than 1 % of the total AChE in the caudate nucleus, but is about 17% in the
`hippocampus and nearly 50% in different parts of the cortex (Atack et aI.,
`1986). In contrast to physostigmine and tacrine, which block both forms
`;;dth equal efficiency, SDZ ENA 713 is 6 times more potent in inhibiting the
`G1 than the G4 form in human brain (Table 2) (Enz et aI., 1992). This
`selective effect on G1 could explain why SDZ ENA 713 is more effective in
`inhibiting AChE in the cortex and hippocampus than in the striatum. In the
`brains of Alzheimer patients there is a decrease in the G4 form in the cortex
`and hippocampus, with little or no change in the G1 form (Atack et aI.,
`1983; Siek et aI., 1990). A preferential inhibition of the G1 form in AD may
`therefore be advantageous.
`Further evidence in favour of a selective effect in the hippocampus
`was based on the finding that SDZ ENA 713, in doses ranging from
`0.08-0.8 mg/kg, also induced synchronization of hippocampal theta wave
`activity in the rat. This resulted from increased muscarinic activity in that
`area, consequent to AChE blockade (Enz et aI., 1989).
`
`I
`i
`t
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`
`224
`
`M. Weinstock et al.
`
`Selective action of SDZ ENA 713 in the eNS of human subjects
`
`The preferential effect of SDZ ENA 713 in those brain areas most affected
`in AD, together with its high oral bioavailability and relatively long duration
`of action (Weinstock et aI., 1986), led to its evaluation in human subjects.
`Studies in normal volunteers showed that in oral doses below 1.5 mg, SDZ
`ENA 713 had no significant effect on plasma butyryl cholinesterase. At
`higher ENA doses, it caused a dose-dependent inhibition, with a peak of
`30% after 1-2 hours, at a dose of 4.6mg, which lasted for about 10 hours
`(Enz et aI., 1991).
`SDZ ENA 713 was also found to have a selective effect in the human
`hippocampus. At a dose of 1.3 mg, that did not inhibit plasma cholinester(cid:173)
`ase, or produce signs of cholinergic hyperactivity, it increased REM sleep
`density by about 50% (Holsboer-Trachsler et aI., 1993). The rise in REM
`sleep density is believed to be due a selective action in the hippocampus and
`areas associated with memory consolidation (Smith and Lapp, 1991) and it
`has been suggested that a reduction in REM sleep density may occur in
`relation to cognitive impairment (Feinberg, 1969).
`So far, studies in laboratory animals and healthy human subjects have
`demonstrated that SDZ ENA 713 may possess several advantages over
`existing AChE inhibitors, which have already been tested for their ability to
`improve memory and cognitive impairments in AD patients or prevent their
`further deterioration (Davis and Mohs, 1982; Davis et aI., 1992). It is well
`absorbed after oral administration and produces consistent, selective, long(cid:173)
`lasting inhibition of AChE in those brain areas which show the greatest
`decrements in cholinergic neurones in AD. This is achieved at doses which
`produce minimal inhibition of peripheral cholinesterase and a low incidence
`of cholinergic side effects. If the lack of cholinergic transmission in cortical
`and hippocampal brain areas is responsible for the cognitive impariments in
`AD, one might expect this drug to produce significant symptomatic im(cid:173)
`provement. It is currently undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with
`Alzheimer's disease.
`
`References
`
`Atack 1R, Perry EK, Bonham 1R, Candy 1M, Perry RH (1986) Molecular forms of
`acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in the aged human central nervous
`system. 1 Neurochem 47: 263-277
`Christie JE, She ring A, Fergusen 1, Glen AIM (1981) Physostigmine and arecholine:
`effects of intravenous infusions in Alzheimer presenile dementia. Br 1 Psychiatry
`138: 46-50
`Davis KL, Mohs RC (1982) Enhancement of memory processes in Alzheimer's disease
`with multiple-dose intravenous physostigmine. Am 1 Psychiatry 139: 1421-1424
`Davis KL, Thai LJ, Gamzu ER, Davis CS, Woolson RF, Gracon SI, et al (1992)
`A double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of tacrine for Alzheimer's
`disease. N Engl 1 Med 327: 1253-1259
`Drachman DA, Leavitt 1 (1974) Human memory and the cholinergic system. Arch
`Neurol 30: 113-121
`

`
`I
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`
`SDZ ENA-713, a CNS-selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
`
`225
`
`Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid
`colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:
`88-95
`Enz A, Amstutz R, Hoffman A, Gmelin G, Kelly PH (1989) Pharmacological pro(cid:173)
`perties of the preferentially centrally-acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor SDZ
`ENA 713. In: Kewitz H, Thomsen T, Bickel U (eds) Pharmacological interventions
`on central cholinergic mechanisms in senile dementia. Zuckschwerdt, Munich, pp
`271-277
`Enz A, Boddeke H, Grey J, Spiegel R (1991) Pharmacologic and clinicopharmacologic
`properties of SDZ ENA 713, a centrally-selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor.
`Ann NY Acad Sci 640: 272-275
`Enz A, Chappuis A, Probst A (1992) Different influence of inhibitors of acetyl(cid:173)
`cholinesterase molecular forms G 1 and G4 isolated from Alzheimer's disease and
`control brains. In: Shafferman A, Velan B (eds) Multidisciplinary approaches to
`cholinesterase functions. Plenum Press, New York, pp 243-249
`Feinberg I, Braun M, Shulman E (1969) EEG sleep patterns in mental retardation.
`Encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 27: 128-141
`Holsboer-Trachsler E, Hatzinger M, Syohler R, Hemmeter U, Gray J, Muller J, et al
`(1993) Effects of the novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitor SDZ ENA 713 on sleep in
`man. Neuropsychopharmacology 8: 87-92
`Machne X, Unna KWR (1963) Actions at the central nervous system. In: Koelle
`GB (ed) Cholinesterase and anticholinesterase agents. Springer, Berlin Gottingen
`Heidelberg, pp 679-701
`Siek GC, Katz LS, Fishman EB, Korosi TS, Maquis JK (1990) Molecular forms of
`acetylcholinesterase in subcortical areas of normal and Alzheimer disease brain.
`BioI Psychiatry 27: 573-580
`Sims NR, Bowen DM (1983) Changes in choline acetyltransferase and in acetylcholine
`synthesis. In: Reisberg B (ed) Alzheimer's disease. Free Press, New York, pp
`88-92
`Summers WK, Majovski LV, Marsh GM, Tachiki K, Kling A (1986) Oral tetrahy(cid:173)
`droaminoacridine in long term treatment of senile dementia, Alzheimer type.
`N Engl J Med 315: 1241-1245
`ThaI LJ, Fuld PA, Masur OM, Sharpless NS (1983) Oral physostigmine and lecithin
`improve memory in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 13: 491-496
`Weinstock M, Razin M, Chorev M, Tashma Z (1986) Pharmacological activity of novel
`anticholinesterase agents of potential use in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
`In: Fisher A, Hanin I, Lachman C (eds) Advances in behavioral biology. Plenum
`Press, New York, pp 539-551
`Weinstock. M, Razin M, Ringel I, Tashma Z, Chorev M (1992) Acetylcholinesterase
`inhibition by novel carbamates: a kinetic and nuclear magnetic resonance study. In:
`Shafferman A, Velan B (eds) Multidisciplinary approaches to cholinesterase func(cid:173)
`tions. Plenum Press, New York, pp 251-259
`Whitehouse PJ, Price DL, Clark AW, Coyle JT, Delong MR (1981) Alzheimer's
`disease: evidence for selective loss of cholinergic neurone in the nucleus basalis.
`Ann Neurol 10: 122-126
`
`Authors' address: Dr. M. Weinstock, Department of Pharmacology, School of
`Pharmacy, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel.
`
`~
`
`I
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2027
`Noven v. Novartis and LTS Lohmann
`IPR2014-00550
`Page 8 of 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket