throbber
}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Oxidation of Nicotine.
`
`I.
`
`Kinetics of the Liquid Phase Reaction
`Near Room Temperature
`
`Robert H. Lionel!
`
`Department of Chemistry. University at Vermont
`Burlington. Vermont. U.S.A.
`
`
`
`"[613286L0§
`
`(35°C. and 75% relative humidity)
`although ozddase is ‘datroyed. The
`heat treated tobacco absorbed Oz in-
`tensely initially but decreased with
`time whereas non-heat
`treated'to—
`bacco ruches a maximum 02 uptake
`rate after some time and then de—
`creases. Recently Wada(3) has oxi-
`dized nicotine at 30°C. with pure O2
`and found about 20% of-the nicotine
`oxidized in 4 weeks. He found am-
`monia, methyl amine, nicotinic acid,
`myosmine, cotinine, nicotyrine and
`unidentified products.
`
`Experimental
`Nicotine was vacuum distilled in
`3 Todd Column packed with glass
`helixes and the fraction at 97-98“
`(10 mm.) taken (reflux ratio 10:1).
`Frahly distilled, water—clear nicotine
`turns yellow in a few hours when
`exposed to air, but when sealed off
`in a glass ampule under vacuum it
`remains colorless for months. Pre-~
`liminary work was done—using an
`AMINCO Warburg apparatus at 20—
`40“ and with various shaking rates.
`It was found that with N, in the
`Warburg there was not volume
`change, with 0, there was a rapid
`uptake of gas which was roughly 5
`times the uptake rate using air: rates
`increased with shaking speeds and
`increased with temperature. Nicotine
`acidified with H01, H280.
`and
`HOAc did not have any 02 uptake
`activity indicating that the free base
`is involved in the oxidation. To ob-
`tain kinetic data an apparatus was
`constructed which consisted of a flat
`bottom flask of about 50 ml. volume
`fitted with a ground glass stopper
`for filling and a side arm which was
`connected to a 100 ml. gas burette
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`! agricultural
`sent level of
`\enL
`
`ecl
`
`reficients of
`Friction Be.
`- and Various
`Unpublished
`Agricultural
`-tate College,
`
`'I coeflicients
`l materials.
`ing 35 (6):
`
`-). Coeflicient
`Ir corn and
`ublished re
`—52Rl, Inter.
`-mpany, Chi.
`
`S. C. W. Sys-
`Bright Laf
`Yorth Caro-
`
`Neight and
`can Science
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`introduction
`Although the biochemical degrada-
`tion and oxidation of nicotine has
`been extensively investigated (1), the
`kinetics of the reaction of oxygen
`with nicotine has not previously been
`
`reports ‘ that
`reported. 0babko(2)
`heating tobacco containing 25-28%
`H20 (in an inert N, atmosphere) to
`70.75°C. does not deprive the tobacco
`of its ability to bind 02 from air
`under fermentation conditions
`
`
`
`30
`
`20
`
`IO
`
`
`
`ML02once
`
`(Tobacco Science 89)
`
`TIME sec . IO'2
`Figaro I.
`
`IOO
`
`ISO
`
`
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
` an;AM‘
`-2:him
`o'er
`5.s
`-r
`'1‘.
`
`containing sat. NaCl-Hfi and a 3-
`way stop-cock for flushing the apps-
`ratus with gas. Oxygen gas at 1 at-
`mosphere pressure was used in all
`experiments. The reaction flask was
`mounted on a shaker which had
`variable amplimde and speed and was
`immersed in a water bath regulated
`to i 01°C. Experiments were per-
`formed at various shaking ampli-
`tudes and speed with nicotine sam—
`ples of 1.00-5.00 ml. A sample size
`of 2.00 ml. and shaking at 440 cyclm/
`minute with an amplitude of 7—8 mm.
`(measured at the sample) yielded
`rates of oxygen uptake that were
`independent of shaking for the tem—
`perature range of 15—40° used in this
`study. Nicotine stored in contact with
`air'decrensed in rate of oxygen up—
`take compared to firmth vacuum
`distilled nicotine Vacuum storage
`prevents aging but air contact dur-
`ing sample removal gradually aged
`the stored nicotine: this problem was
`solved by using Mathaon Prepuri—
`lied N2 (8 ppm 0,) to flush out the
`nicotine storage flask after each sam-
`ple removal and in this way identical
`mtas could be obtained from the
`same nicotine over a period of one
`week.
`Oxygen was bubbled into nicotine
`held at temperatures from 50-70°C.
`The nicotine rapidly turned brown
`and an infrared band at 5.9 microns,
`absent in pure nicotine, increased in
`intensity as
`the experiment
`con—
`tinued. The infrared band suggests
`cotinine is being formed(4). Oxida—
`tion for several days and then using
`Frankenburg‘s(4) technique for iso-
`lation of cotinine indimted complex
`reaction products. Addition of a free
`radical
`initiator, a,
`a'—
`'-isobu-
`tyronitrile (AIBN), in a similar ex—
`periment,
`resulted in more rapid
`darkening of the nicotine and simi-
`lar. if not identical, reaction prod-
`ucts. Addition of an antioxidant,
`4-methyl—2, 6—di-tert-butylphenol
`(BET), greatly decreased rate of
`coloration of nicotine on oxidation
`and inactivated nicotine to 0, for
`several hours.
`Several experiments were done on
`a burley tobacco containing about
`5% nicotine. Samples of the tobacco
`were heated in an atmosphere con—
`taining N2, air or 02 and the nico-
`tine was determined by the method
`of Cundifl(5). No change in nicotine
`content was found with N, at tan-
`peratures from 85-125°C. With 0,,
`the nicotine was reduced to one—half
`its original value in 300 hours at
`85‘, 24 hours at 110' and 3 hours at
`125°. The oxidized tobacco had a
`pleasant aromatic odor.
`
`f.
`'~.~‘.
`,w
`335:?
`‘.’3
` a“
`httl|egacy.library.ucsf.edultid/nnal4d00/pdf
`
`
`Table 1. linear Rates of Oxygen Absorbed by Liquid Nicotine
`
`ML0.(5r?)
`
`induction
`x lO‘
`period
`sec—ll x ml.
`Temp. °C. nicotine“1 sea): In“
`15
`1.08
`5.60
`
`20
`
`25
`
`1.35
`
`1.61
`
`2.46
`
`1.60
`
`i
`
`2
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`Remarks
`Nicotine stored
`24 hrs. under N2.
`Nicotine stored
`10 days under N2.
`Nicotine «fresh
`
`from vacuum dist.
`
`Run
`IX—ZO
`
`XIV-24
`
`V-18
`
`VII-19
`
`XIII-23
`
`XIV-25
`
`XVI—25
`
`XVII-26
`XII—22
`
`VIII-20
`
`X—21
`
`XI—21
`
`III—16
`
`111—16
`
`I'V-16
`
`No storage.
`Nicotine stored
`24 hrs. under N2.
`Nicotine stored
`10 days under N,.
`Nicotine stored
`14 days under N...
`Nicotine stored
`14 days under N2.
`Added 50 mg. 3111'
`Nicotine stored
`4 days under N2.
`Nicotine stored
`24 hrs. under N}.
`Nicotine stored -
`3 days under N1.—
`Nicotine stored -
`4 days under N2.
`Nicotine yellow
`from storage" ime
`month in poor
`vacuum.
`Reused nicotine
`from 11—16.
`immediately.
`Reused nicotine
`from III-16 24
`hours later.
`
`
`25
`
`25
`
`25
`
`25
`
`25
`30
`
`35
`
`35
`
`40
`
`25
`
`25
`
`25
`
`1.51
`
`1.59
`
`1.47
`
`1.54
`
`none
`1.73
`
`2.09
`
`2.10
`
`2.34
`
`1.21
`
`0.80
`
`0.18
`
`2.12
`
`2.22
`
`1.98
`
`1.70
`
`29
`1.58
`
`0.86
`
`0.88
`
`0.64
`
`2.10
`
`——
`
`—
`
`Results and Discussion
`In Figure 1 typical plots of vol-
`ume 0, used vs. time are shown.
`Table 1 tabulates all the results
`where rates are those from the linear
`part of the reaction. An Arrhenius
`plot of the maximum rata of table
`1 yields an activation energy of 6.81
`kcal (least squares). This is a low
`activation energy compared to the
`uncatalyzed oxidation of hydrocar-
`bons such as tetralin where the over—
`all activation energy is 14.9 i 0.6
`km]. from 65-130'C.(6) If the‘linear
`rates are extrapolated back to zero
`oxiy'gm uptake, and this time (allied
`the induction period tind. a plot of
`log (ll‘ind) vs 111‘ (assuming first
`order kinetics) would yield an activa—
`tion energy for the removal of in-
`hibitor (initiation). A value of 14.5
`keel. is found. The induction period
`could be due to formation and de-
`composition of a nicotine hydro-
`peron‘de but it is premature to as-
`
`ITobacco Science .90)
`
`sociate an activation energy with this
`proposed mechanism. A small appar—
`ent evolufion of gas in the initial
`periods of lower temperature rate
`studies is probably due to decreased
`gas solubility in the nicotine at lower
`temperatures:
`In the experiments reported here,
`2.00 ml. nicotine. at room temp, was
`used. corresponding to 1.88 x 104
`moles. For the consumption of one
`mole 0: per mole nicotine we would
`therefore require 421 ml. 02 at STP.
`Most experiments were run to a total
`0: consumption of 20-30 ml. (STP)
`and inhibition (deviation from linear
`rate) was noted at about 15 ml.
`(STP) 02 consumption. The low 0,]
`nicotine mole ratio at which inhibi—
`tion is found (about 0.03) together
`with inhibition by BHT and cam-lynx.
`by AIBN provides strong evidence
`of the free-radical nature of the en'—
`dation. This indicates nicotine oxi-
`dation follows the general mechanism
`
`
`
`ZATZRGIBG
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`of olefin oxidationfl) and a nicotine
`hydroperoxide may be expected as
`an intermediate. The proposed hydro-
`peroxide could be unstable at room
`umperature, yielding- H20,
`(which
`could form nicotine N-oxide). cati-
`nine, 320. and radicals which could
`mntinue the chain reaction and form
`complex polymers. Further work is
`underway to isolate the proposed
`hydroperoxide and provide more de-
`hils on the mechanism of the re-
`action.
`
`Aclmowlodgmenl'
`The author thanks the Tobacco
`Industry Research Committee which
`provided financial assistance making
`this work possible.
`
`Liferahlre Cii'ed
`
`1. McKennis, H. In, Tumbull, L. B..
`Wingfield, H. N. Jr, and Dewey,
`L. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1634
`(1958); ibid 6597.
`2. Obabko, V. A_, Vscsoyuz. Nanak.-
`Issledovaiel. Inst. Tabach. i Mak—
`harach. Prom. No. 142,
`105—72
`
`(1940); ibid. pp. 176-207. Chem.
`Abs. 36, 1439.
`3. Wade, E., Khaki, T. and Saito.
`K, Arch. Biochem. and Biophys.
`79, 124 (1959).
`4. Frankenburg, W. G. and A. A.
`Vaibekunas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79,
`149 (1957).
`5. Cunditf, R. H. and Markunas, P.
`C., Anal. Chem. 27, 1950 (1955).
`6. George, P.. Ridefl. E. K. and
`Robertson. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. 185,
`288 (1946).
`7. Bateman, L., Quart. Rev. 8, 147
`(1954).
`
`
`
`-' with this
`all tappar-
`he initial
`ture rate
`decreased
`2 at lower
`
`'ted here,
`211113., was
`38 x 10"
`n of one
`are would
`at STP.
`to a. total
`i. (STP)
`rm linear
`15 ml.
`low 0.]
`I inhibi-
`together
`:afalysis
`Evidence
`the oxi-
`Ene oxi.
`:hanism
`
`http:/lleg
`
`y.librel'y.ucsf.edulfid[nna14d00lpdf
`
`(Tobacco Science 551)
`
`€61286LOS
`
`l
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Noven Ex. 1022
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket