`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 13
`Date: September 16, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICROGRAFX, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`Case IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`Case IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)1
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before RICHARD E. RICE and BARBARA A. PARVIS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`RICE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)
`
`
`
`On September 15, 2014, the initial conference call was held in related
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2014-532, IPR2014-533, and IPR2014-534, between counsel for
`
`the respective parties and Judges Rice and Parvis. The purpose of the initial
`
`conference call was to discuss the Scheduling Order and any motions that
`
`the parties anticipated filing during the trial. See Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,765 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`
`
`Motions
`
`Neither party sought authorization to file a motion. As explained
`
`during the call, if Patent Owner determines that it will file a motion to
`
`amend, Patent Owner must arrange a conference call soon thereafter with the
`
`Board and Petitioner’s counsel to discuss the proposed motion to amend.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a).
`
`If a party seeks authorization to file a motion not contemplated
`
`specifically in the Scheduling Order, the party requesting such authorization
`
`must arrange a conference call with opposing counsel and the Board.
`
`
`
`Schedule
`
`Except as noted below, neither party identified an issue with the
`
`Scheduling Orders entered August 12, 2014. See IPR2014-532 (Paper 12);
`
`IPR2014-533 (Paper 12); IPR2014-534 (Paper 12).
`
`To the extent issues arise with respect to DUE DATES 1-5 identified
`
`in any of the Scheduling Orders, the parties are reminded that, without
`
`obtaining prior authorization from the panel, they may stipulate to different
`
`dates for DUE DATES 1-5, as provided in the Scheduling Order, by filing
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)
`
`
`an appropriate notice with the Board. The parties may not stipulate to any
`
`
`
`other changes to the Scheduling Order.
`
`The parties indicated that they would be filing with the Board in the
`
`near future papers reflecting stipulated schedule changes to accommodate a
`
`deposition.
`
`
`
`The parties had nothing to report with respect to settlement.
`
`Settlement
`
`It is hereby
`
`Order
`
`ORDERED that no motions are authorized at this time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`John Phillips
`phillips@fr.com
`
`Michael Hawkins
`Hawkins@fr.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Douglas Wilson
`dwilson@hpcllp.com
`
`Michael Heim
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`
`Nathan Davis
`ndavis@hpcllp.com
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
