throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 29
`Date: March 27, 2015
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICROGRAFX, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`Case IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`Case IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)1
`
`_______________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, RICHARD E. RICE, and
`BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(1)
`
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`Case IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`Case IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)
`
`
`
`On March 25, 2015, a conference call was held involving counsel for
`the respective parties and Judges Medley, Rice, and Parvis. Patent Owner
`initiated the call to seek authorization to file a surreply in each of the
`proceedings. In particular, Patent Owner seeks leave to respond to
`arguments made in Petitioner’s Reply (Paper 25 at 1)2 that Patent Owner is
`not related to original patentee.
`
`Based on the discussion, the parties proposed allowing Patent Owner
`an opportunity to respond to Petitioner’s allegations during any hearing held.
`Provided a hearing is requested and granted, Patent Owner briefly may
`respond during the hearing to arguments made in Petitioner’s Reply that
`Patent Owner is not related to original patentee. Patent Owner, however, is
`not permitted to present evidence not already of record in the files of these
`proceedings in support of the response.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is not authorized to file a surreply; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that provided a hearing is requested and
`granted, Patent Owner is authorized to briefly respond during the hearing to
`arguments made in Petitioner’s Reply that Patent Owner is not related to
`original patentee; however, Patent Owner is not permitted to present
`evidence not already of record in the files of these proceedings in support of
`the response.
`
`
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2014-00532.
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00532 (Patent 5,959,633)
`Case IPR2014-00533 (Patent 6,057,854)
`Case IPR2014-00534 (Patent 6,552,732 B1)
`
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`John Phillips
`Michael Hawkins
`FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
`phillips@fr.com
`Hawkins@fr.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Douglas Wilson
`Michael Heim
`Nathan Davis
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P
`dwilson@hpcllp.com
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`ndavis@hpcllp.com
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket