throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-03595-N
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROGRAFX, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`GOOGLE, INC. and MOTOROLA
`MOBILITY, LLC
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF MICROGRAFX, LLC’S PRELIMINARY DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED
`CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiff Micrografx, LLC (“Micrografx”), by and through its attorneys, pursuant to
`
`Miscellaneous Order No. 62 (“Order 62”) and the Joint Proposed Schedule of the Initial Case
`
`Management Report, Dkt. 41 Ex. A, hereby serves its Preliminary Disclosure of Asserted Claims
`
`and Infringement Contentions against Google, Inc. (“Google”) and Motorola Mobility, LLC
`
`(“Motorola”) (individually and collectively, “Defendants”), as well Micrografx’s accompanying
`
`document production as required by Order 62. These contentions address infringement by
`
`Google and by Motorola of U.S. Patents No. 6,057,854 (“’854 patent”), No. 6,552,732 (“’732
`
`patent”), and No. 5,959,633 (“’633 patent”) (collectively “Asserted Patents”).
`
`This disclosure is made solely for the purpose of this action. This disclosure is subject to
`
`all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and to any
`
`other objections on grounds that would require the exclusion of statements contained herein if
`
`such disclosure were asked of, or statement contained herein were made by, a witness present
`
`and testifying in court, all of which objections and grounds are expressly reserved and may be
`
`interposed at the time of trial.
`
`1
`
`GOOGLE-1008
`
`

`
`Discovery in this matter has just begun. Defendants have not yet been required to make
`
`their initial production subject to Order 62, 3-4, including: “[s]ource code, specifications,
`
`schematics, flow charts, artwork, formulas, or other documentation sufficient to show the
`
`operation of any aspects or elements of an accused instrumentality identified by the patent
`
`claimant in its paragraph 3-1(a)(3) chart.” Id. at 8. Nor have Google and Motorola otherwise
`
`produced source code relating to the accused instrumentalities in this matter. Micrografx’s
`
`investigation of Google’s and Motorola’s infringement is ongoing. This disclosure is therefore
`
`based in large part upon information that Micrografx has been able to obtain publicly, together
`
`with Micrografx’s current good faith beliefs regarding the accused instrumentalities. This
`
`disclosure is given without prejudice to Micrografx’s rights, and Micrografx hereby expressly
`
`reserves its rights under Order 62, 3-6 and 3-7, or any other applicable basis, to further
`
`supplement or amend its contentions, including without limitation to add asserted claims or
`
`accused instrumentalities as additional facts are ascertained, analyses are made, research is
`
`completed, contentions are made, and claims are construed. The following disclosures are made
`
`subject to and without waiving any of the foregoing.
`
`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO GOOGLE
`
`A.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST GOOGLE
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(1), Micrografx, based on the information presently available
`
`to it, asserts that each of the following claims is infringed by Google: ’854 Patent claims 1, 2, 3,
`
`5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71,’732 Patent
`
`claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42, and ’633 Patent claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15.
`
`B.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF GOOGLE’S ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(2), Micrografx, based on the information presently available
`
`to it, identifies the following Google accused instrumentalities and which claims each Google
`
`2
`
`

`
`accused instrumentality is accused of infringing. Each of the Google accused instrumentalities
`
`identified below may itself constitute one part or step of a completed act of direct infringement,
`
`as described in detail in the infringement charts discussed below and attached hereto as Exhibits
`
`1, 3, and 5.
`
`Google infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(a) by making, using, selling, or
`
`offering to sell in the United States without authority the Google accused instrumentalities listed
`
`below with respect to each of the Asserted Patents, which accused instrumentalities include
`
`technology in the fields of vector graphics (’854 and ’732 patents) and external shapes (’633
`
`patent).
`
`1.
`
`’854 Patent: Google Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Google’s Nexus 4 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’s Nexus 5 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’s Nexus 7 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’s Nexus 10 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’s Chrome Browser (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57,
`59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google Maps (Android, iOS, web) (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55,
`56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’s Chromebook Pixel (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56,
`57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Google’ servers providing vector graphics (e.g. Google Maps servers) (Claims 1, 2, 3,
`5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19)
`• Google’s interactive vector objects (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7)
`
`
`
`2.
`
`’732 Patent: Google Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Google’s Nexus 4 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google’s Nexus 5 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google’s Nexus 7 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google’s Nexus 10 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google’s Chrome Browser (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google Maps (Android, iOS, web) (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`
`3
`
`

`
`• Google’s Chromebook Pixel (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Google’s servers providing vector graphics (e.g. Google Maps servers) (Claims 1, 2,
`3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12)
`• Google’s interactive vector objects (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
`
`3.
`
`’633 Patent: Google Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Google’s Nexus 4 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
`• Google’s Nexus 5 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
`• Google’s Nexus 7 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
`• Google’s Nexus 10 (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6)
`• Google Maps Application for Android (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`
`
`
`
`
`The particular acts constituting infringement by or including each of the above-listed
`
`Google instrumentalities are detailed in the claim charts attached herewith as Exhibits 1, 3, and 5,
`
`pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(3).
`
`Further, although this disclosure is not required by Order 62, on information and belief,
`
`Google also infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(b) by inducing infringement of each
`
`of the asserted claims with respect to the above-listed accused instrumentalities, such as by end
`
`users of Google devices and services; and such as by Google’s inducement of Motorola to make,
`
`use, sell, offer for sale, or import the Motorola accused instrumentalities. Similarly, on
`
`information and belief, Google induces other third-party device manufacturers through acts like
`
`those just described with respect to Motorola. On information and belief, Google actively
`
`induces infringement by third parties by actively and knowingly supplying both hardware and
`
`software, encouraging consumers to acquire and use such hardware and software in an infringing
`
`manner, and thereby making and/or using the infringing systems and apparatuses or performing
`
`the steps of the asserted method claims, with knowledge that such conduct constitutes an act of
`
`infringement.
`
`Further, although this disclosure is not required by Order 62, on information and belief,
`
`Google infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(c) by offering to sell or selling within the
`
`4
`
`

`
`United States software and/or hardware for use in practicing each of the asserted claims, where
`
`the software and/or hardware constitutes a material part of the claimed inventions, Google knows
`
`the software to be especially made or especially adapted for use in infringement of the asserted
`
`claims, and the software and/or hardware is not a staple article or commodity of commerce
`
`suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`C.
`
`CHARTS IDENTIFYING INFRINGEMENT OF THE MICROGRAFX
`PATENTS BY THE GOOGLE ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(3), attached as Exhibits 1, 3, and 5, are detailed charts
`
`identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim is found within each Google
`
`accused instrumentality. Micrografx notes that neither Google nor Motorola has yet provided
`
`discovery in this matter and Micrografx has prepared these charts based on the limited
`
`information presently available to it and accordingly reserves its right to amend or supplement
`
`these charts upon obtaining relevant information during discovery.
`
`D.
`
`DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS WITH RESPECT TO GOOGLE
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(4), Micrografx contends based on information available to it
`
`at this time that each element of each asserted claim is literally present in each Google accused
`
`instrumentality as set forth above and identified in the charts attached as Exhibits 1, 3, and 5.
`
`Based on the information presently available to it, Micrografx believes that any element
`
`of the asserted claims that is not literally met by the Google accused instrumentalities is likely to
`
`be met under the Doctrine of Equivalents. However, Google has not yet made its initial
`
`production, as described above. Nor has Google otherwise made any production of source code
`
`relating to the Google accused instrumentalities in this matter. Micrografx’s investigation of
`
`Google’s infringement is ongoing.
`
`5
`
`

`
`This disclosure is therefore based upon information that Micrografx has been able to
`
`obtain publicly, together with Micrografx’s current good faith beliefs regarding the accused
`
`instrumentalities. This disclosure is given without prejudice to Micrografx’s right to further
`
`supplement or amend as additional facts are ascertained, analyses are made, research is
`
`completed, contentions are made, and claims are construed, and Micrografx hereby expressly
`
`reserves its right to amend its contentions regarding infringement under the Doctrine of
`
`Equivalents after it obtains and has been able to analyze the necessary discovery from Google, as
`
`well as Motorola and any relevant third parties.
`
`II.
`
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO MOTOROLA
`
`A.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST MOTOROLA
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(1), Micrografx, based on the information presently available
`
`to it, asserts that each of the following claims is infringed by Motorola: ’854 Patent claims 1, 2, 3,
`
`5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71,’732 Patent
`
`claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42, and ’633 Patent claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15.
`
`B.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF MOTOROLA’S ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(2), Micrografx, based on the information presently available
`
`to it, identifies the following Motorola accused instrumentalities and which claims each
`
`Motorola accused instrumentality is accused of infringing. Each of the Motorola accused
`
`instrumentalities identified below may itself constitute one part or step of a completed act of
`
`direct infringement, as described in detail in the infringement charts discussed below and
`
`attached hereto as Exhibits 2, 4, and 6.
`
`Motorola infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(a) by making, using, selling, or
`
`offering to sell in the United States without authority the Motorola accused instrumentalities
`
`listed below with respect to each of the Asserted Patents, which accused instrumentalities include
`
`6
`
`

`
`technology in the fields of vector graphics (’854 and ’732 patents) and external shapes (’633
`
`patent).
`
`1.
`
`’854 Patent: Motorola Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Motorola’s Moto X (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Moto G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61,
`62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr M (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57,
`59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57,
`59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr Maxx HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55,
`56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Ultra (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59,
`61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Mini (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57, 59,
`61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Droid Maxx (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57,
`59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`• Motorola’s Photon Q 4G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 44, 55, 56, 57,
`59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71)
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`’732 Patent: Motorola Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Motorola’s Moto X (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Moto G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr M (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr Maxx HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Photon Q 4G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Ultra (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Mini (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`• Motorola’s Droid Maxx (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 36, 42)
`
`3.
`
`’633 Patent: Motorola Infringing Instrumentalities:
`
`• Motorola’s Moto X (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Moto G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr M (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Droid Razr Maxx HD (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Droid Ultra (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`
`7
`
`

`
`• Motorola’s Droid Mini (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Droid Maxx (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`• Motorola’s Photon Q 4G (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
`
`
`
`The particular acts constituting infringement by or including each of the above-listed
`
`instrumentalities are detailed in the claim charts attached herewith as Exhibits 2, 4, and 6,
`
`pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(3).
`
`Further, although this disclosure is not required by Order 62, on information and belief,
`
`Motorola infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(b) by inducing infringement of each of
`
`the asserted claims with respect to the above-listed accused instrumentalities, such as by end
`
`users of Motorola devices. On information and belief, Motorola actively induces infringement
`
`by third parties by actively and knowingly supplying both hardware and software, encouraging
`
`consumers to acquire and use such hardware and software in an infringing manner, and thereby
`
`making and/or using the infringing systems and apparatuses or performing the steps of the
`
`asserted method claims, with knowledge that such conduct constitutes an act of infringement.
`
`Further, although this disclosure is not required by Order 62, on information and belief,
`
`Motorola infringes the asserted claims pursuant to § 271(c) by offering to sell or selling within
`
`the United States software and/or hardware for use in practicing each of the asserted claims,
`
`where the software and/or hardware constitutes a material part of the claimed inventions,
`
`Motorola knows the software to be especially made or especially adapted for use in infringement
`
`of the asserted claims, and the software and/or hardware is not a staple article or commodity of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`C.
`
`CHARTS IDENTIFYING INFRINGEMENT OF THE MICROGRAFX
`PATENTS BY THE MOTOROLA ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(3), attached as Exhibits 2, 4, and 6 are detailed charts
`
`identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim is found within each Motorola
`
`8
`
`

`
`accused instrumentality. Micrografx notes that neither Motorola nor Google has yet provided
`
`discovery in this matter and Micrografx has prepared these charts based on the limited
`
`information presently available to it and accordingly reserves its right to amend or supplement
`
`these charts upon obtaining relevant information during discovery.
`
`D.
`
`DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS WITH RESPECT TO MOTOROLA
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(4), Micrografx contends based on information available to it
`
`at this time that each element of each asserted claim is literally present in each Motorola accused
`
`instrumentality as set forth above and identified in the charts attached as Exhibits 2, 4, and 6.
`
`Based on the information presently available to it, Micrografx believes that any element
`
`of the asserted claims that is not literally met by the Accused Instrumentalities is likely to be met
`
`under the Doctrine of Equivalents. However, Motorola has not yet made its initial production, as
`
`described above. Nor has Motorola otherwise made any production of source code relating to
`
`the accused instrumentalities in this matter. Micrografx’s investigation of Motorola’s
`
`infringement is ongoing.
`
`This disclosure is therefore based upon information that Micrografx has been able to
`
`obtain publicly, together with Micrografx’s current good faith beliefs regarding the accused
`
`instrumentalities. This disclosure is given without prejudice to Micrografx’s right to further
`
`supplement or amend as additional facts are ascertained, analyses are made, research is
`
`completed, contentions are made, and claims are construed, and Micrografx hereby expressly
`
`reserves its right to amend its contentions regarding infringement under the Doctrine of
`
`Equivalents after it obtains and has been able to analyze the necessary discovery from Motorola,
`
`as well as Google and any relevant third parties.
`
`9
`
`

`
`III.
`
`PRIORITY OF MICROGRAFX PATENTS
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(5), Micrografx contends with respect to the ’854 patent that
`
`each asserted claim thereof is entitled to a priority date of at least as early as March 7, 1997,
`
`based on Provisional Application No. 60/040,332 filed the same date. Micrografx contends with
`
`respect to the ’732 patent that each asserted claim thereof is entitled to a priority date of at least
`
`as early as March 7, 1997, based on Provisional Application No. 60/040,332 filed the same date
`
`and Application No. 08/901,043 filed July 28, 1997. Micrografx makes this disclosure without
`
`waiving any argument that it is entitled to an earlier date of invention based on activities
`
`predating the filing of the applications identified above; Micrografx makes this disclosure, which
`
`is not exhaustive, in satisfaction of the Order 62’s requirement identified above.
`
`IV. DISCLOSURE OF PRODUCTS EMBODYING THE CLAIMED INVENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-1(a)(6), Micrografx discloses that on information and belief the
`
`following products embody the following asserted claims: QuickSilver software, in addition to
`
`servers used in conjunction therewith (’854 patent all claims; ’732 patent all claims); Windows
`
`Draw 4 (’633 patent all claims).
`
`V.
`
`ACCOMPANYING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
`
`Pursuant to Order 62, 3-2, Micrografx makes a document production accompanying these
`
`disclosures and states that based on Micrografx’s present information and reasonable search,
`
`documents corresponding to Order 62, 3-2(a)(1) (disclosures, sales, offers for sale prior to dates
`
`of applications) are produced at MCGFX_00001785-1865; documents corresponding to Order 62,
`
`3-2(a)(2) (conception, reduction to practice, design, and development) are produced at
`
`MCGFX_00002467-468; and documents corresponding to Order 62, 3-2(a)(3) (file histories for
`
`each patent in suit) are produced at MCGFX_00000001-1784. Micrografx makes this disclosure
`
`without waiving any argument that it is entitled to an earlier date of invention should additional
`
`10
`
`

`
`information become available at a later time. Additional documents and/or things will be made
`
`available for inspection as follows: QuickSilver. Micrografx expressly reserves its rights,
`
`including any rights to supplement this production.
`
` D
`
`
`
`
`
`ate: January 6, 2014
`
`Respectfully Submitted:
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Paul T. Ehrlich
`
`G. Donald Puckett
`Texas Bar No. 24013358
`Lenny Huang
`California Bar No. 264386
`SKIERMONT PUCKETT LLP
`2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4800W
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`(214) 978-6600 (Telephone)
`(214) 978-6601 (Facsimile)
`donald.puckett@skiermontpuckett.com
`lenny.huang@skiermontpuckett.com
`
`Of Counsel:
`Matthew D. Powers (pro hac vice)
`California Bar No. 104795
`Steven S. Cherensky (pro hac vice)
`California Bar No. 168275
`Paul T. Ehrlich (pro hac vice)
`California Bar No. 228543
`Aaron M. Nathan
`California Bar No. 251316
`Palani P. Rathinasamy (pro hac vice)
`California Bar No. 269852
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`(650) 802-6000 (Telephone)
`(650) 802-6001 (Facsimile)
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
`paul.ehrlich@tensegritylawgroup.com
`aaron.nathan@tensegritylawgroup.com
`palani@tensegritylawgroup.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Micrografx, LLC
`
`11
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are
`
`being served today, January 6, 2014, with a copy of this document via electronic mail.
`
`Jon B. Hyland
`MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C.
`500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3800
`Dallas, Texas 75201-6659
`Phone: (214) 855-7544
`Fax: (214) 978-5360
`E-mail: jhyland@munsch.com
`
`Counsel for Motorola Mobility, LLC &
`Google, Inc.
`
`
`Darin W. Sndyer
`Luann L. Simmons
`David S. Almeling
`Hana K. Andersen
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`dsnyder@omm.com
`lsimmons@omm.com
`dalmeling@omm.com
`handersen@omm.com
`
`Mishima Alam
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`1625 Eye Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`malam@omm.com
`
`Counsel for Motorola Mobility, LLC &
`Google, Inc.
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Megan Nelson
`
`
`
`Megan Nelson
`
`12
`
`

`
`MICROGRAFX’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`EXHIBIT 1 (INFRINGEMENT OF ’854 PATENT BY GOOGLE)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,057,854: Infringement by Google’s Interactive Vector Objects, Servers, Google Maps, Google mobile phones
`(Nexus 4, Nexus 5), Google Tablets (Nexus 7, Nexus 10), Chromebooks (Chromebook Pixel), and Google Chrome Browser
`
`
`    
`
  
`[1A] 1. An interactive vector object stored on a
`computer readable medium and operable to be
`downloaded over a network comprising:
`
` 
` 
 
`The claim is asserted to be infringed by Google’s interactive vector objects stored on Google servers,
`including for example vector objects used with Google Maps. The claim is also asserted to be infringed
`by Google’s use of Android enabled devices (Nexus 4, Nexus 5, Nexus 7, Nexus 10) as well as Google’s
`Chromebook Pixel, to use the interactive vector objects stored on Google servers. In addition, although
`not required in the present contentions, Google’s interactive vector objects are downloaded and used by
`third parties and satisfy the elements of this claim for the same reasons described herein when so used.
`
`The preamble is presumed not to be limiting. In the case that this preamble were determined to be
`limiting, each of the forgoing instrumentalities accused of infringing this claim constitutes an interactive
`vector object stored on a computer readable medium and operable to be downloaded over a network.
`
`There are multiple versions of Google Maps: Google Maps for the web, Google Maps for Android, and
`Google Maps for iOS. Google also has the Google Maps JavaScript API v3, Google Maps Android API,
`and Google Maps SDK for iOS. Google’s servers store interactive vector objects at least for Google
`Maps and any third parties using the Google Cloud Platform, as advertised with the Google Maps Engine.
`See Google, “Maps for Business: Google Maps Engine,” available at
`http://www.google.com/intl/en/enterprise/mapsearth/products/mapsengine.html?utm_source=google&utm
`_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=NA-LCS-2013-Geo-Products-MapsEngine-
`HouseAds&utm_term=%2Bmaps%20%2Bengine&utm_content=SearchAd&gclid=CNnK5t_o4LsCFc5lf
`godwh8AGw (“Build geospatially enabled applications on top of Google’s fast and reliable cloud.”); id.
`(“Google Maps Engine’s core platform capabilities - Map, Share, and Build - are all made possible by Google’s
`fast and reliable cloud infrastructure.”).
`
`The map itself in Google Maps uses vector graphics. Engadget, “Redesigned Google Maps hands-on:
`vector-based, more personal and coming soon to mobile,” available at
`http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/15/redesigned-google-maps-hands-on-io-2013/; Google Official Blog,
`“The next generation of mobile maps,” available at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/next-
`generation-of-mobile-maps.html; Apple Insider, “New Google Maps for iOS Brings vectors, transit and
`navigation features,” available at http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/12/13/new-google-maps-for-ios-
`brings-vectors-transit-and-navigation-features. Other features are also vector graphics. Vector objects
`can be any “Point, Line, Polygon, MultiPoint, MultiLine, MultiPolygon and Geometry Collection.”
`Google Maps Engine Help, “Vector tables New!”, available at
`
`
`
`1
`
`13
`
`

`
`MICROGRAFX’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`EXHIBIT 1 (INFRINGEMENT OF ’854 PATENT BY GOOGLE)
`
`    
`
  
`
`[1B] data operable to be downloaded to a client
`system connectable to the network and [1C] in
`connection with a vector graphics network file to
`render an image of the vector object on the client
`system;
`
` 
` 
 
`https://support.google.com/mapsengine/answer/3399778?hl=en. For example, when directions are
`requested in Google Maps, lines appear on the map illustrating those directions, and those lines are
`“polylines.” Google Developers, Google Maps JavaScript API v3, “Directions Service,” available at
`https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/directions. Polylines are “objects [that] use
`the vector drawing capabilities of the browser.” Google Developers, Google Maps JavaScript API v2
`Overlays, available at
`https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/v2/overlays#Polylines_Overview
`(emphasis added). The vector objects in these examples are stored on a computer readable medium on
`Google’s servers.
`
`Operability for downloading is discussed with claim element 1B, and interactivity is discussed with claim
`elements 1D and 1E.
`1B: Google’s interactive vector objects comprise data operable to be downloaded to a client system
`connectable to a network. First, Google has said that the data is downloaded to client systems. Google
`“Maps will download ‘vector tiles’ that describe the underlying geometry of the map.” Google Official
`Blog, “Under the hood of Google Maps 5.0 for Android,” available at
`http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/under-hood-of-google-maps-50-for.html (emphasis added).
`Also, when requesting directions, the Google Maps JavaScript API v3 needs to “make a call to an
`external server.” Google Developers, Google Maps JavaScript API v3, “Directions Service,” available at
`https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/directions. The Google Maps API
`Directions Service “ receives direction requests and returns computed results” to the client system, which
`can be used with the “DirectionsRenderer object” to display the directions as a polyline on the client
`system. Id.
`
`Second, the client systems are connectable to a network. Client systems include, for example, the Nexus
`7 and the Moto X that are operable to run Google Maps or the Android API. These and other client
`systems that can receive Google interactive vector objects are connectable to a network.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`14
`
`

`
`MICROGRAFX’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`EXHIBIT 1 (INFRINGEMENT OF ’854 PATENT BY GOOGLE)
`
`    
`
  
`
` 
` 
 
`
`
`Fig. 1. Fig. 2.
`Image in Fig. 1 from MotoX, available at http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/devices/motorola/moto-x-
`black.html#fbid=pSTlONTpF-3. Image in Fig. 2 from Nexus 7, available at
`https://play.google.com/store/devices/details/Nexus_7_2012_8GB?id=nexus_7_8gb&hl=en.
`
`As another example of a client system, the iPhone 4s, which is operable to run Google Maps for iOS or
`the iOS SDK, is likewise connectable to a network, as shown by the relevant specifications shown below
`in Figure 3.
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. from iPhone 4s, available at http://store.apple.com/us/buy-iphone/iphone4s.
`
`The Chrome browser, operable to run Google Maps for the web or the JavaScript API, is connectable to a
`network, as shown by the https:// line in below Figure 5. Therefore, for each relevant Google Maps
`program, a client system is connectable to a network.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`15
`
`

`
`MICROGRAFX’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`EXHIBIT 1 (INFRINGEMENT OF ’854 PATENT BY GOOGLE)
`
`    
`
  
`
` 
` 
 
`
`
`1C: Google’s interactive vector objects comprise data operable in connection with a vector graphics
`network file to render an image of the vector object on the client system. On the Android devices, the
`vector graphics network file renders an image of the vector object on the client system based on the data
`with the rendering engine OpenGL ES. OpenGL ES “render[s] the map” for the Google Maps Android
`API and “[i]f OpenGL ES version 2 is not installed, your map will not appear.” Google Developers,
`Google Maps Android API v2, Getting Started, available at
`https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/android/start#specify_requirement_for_opengl_es_ve
`rsion_2. Chrome Browser has rendering engines that could make up part of the vector graphics network
`file that renders an image of the vector object based on the data: WebGL and Blink. See Chrome
`Experiments, “MapsGL,” available at http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/mapsgl/ (“[V]ector data
`for the map is sent to the browser and rendered on the fly using WebGL.”); The Chromium Projects,
`“Blink,” http://www.chromium.org/blink (“Blink is the rendering engine used by Chromium.”). On
`information and belief, based on the commonalities among different versions of Google Maps, there is
`also a vector graphics extension for the iOS platform. The below pictured Figures 5, 7, and 9, show
`rendered images and demonstrate that the data is operable in connection with a vector graphics network
`file to render an image on the client system.
`Google’s interactive vector objects comprise an active area predefined by the vector object that is
`associated with a command to be performed in response to an event therein.
`
`For example, the buildings on the map and the polylines added in response to a request for directions are
`both vector objects, as indicated with respect to claim element 1A. They each have an active area that is
`predefined by the vector object. For a polyline, the image of the polyline corresponds to an active area
`predefined by the vector object because it is the area in which a recognized event—such as a mouse
`click—can occur, as described in the below table:
`
`
`[1D] an active area predefined by the vector object,
`the active area associated with a command to be
`performed in response to an event therein; and
`
`
`
`4
`
`16
`
`

`
`MICROGRAFX’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`EXHIBIT 1 (INFRINGEMENT OF ’854 PATENT BY GOOGLE)
`
`    
`
  
`
` 
` 
 
`
`Fig. 4. Google Developers, Google Maps JavaScript API v3 Reference, available at
`https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/reference#Polyline.
`
`Th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket