`
`f, kd this 2t111
`
`rJ ay of Od-okev I zv p.J :L n ~ Vl ctM-fCI
`__ j<XJ/L
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civil Action No.: 1:13-cv-00009-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS,
`INC., a Delaware corporation,
`INTERDIGIT AL TECHNOLOGY
`CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
`IPR LICENSING, INC., a Delaware
`corporation, and INTERDIGITAL
`HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
`Defendants,
`
`v.
`
`ZTE CORPORATION, a Chinese corporation,
`and ZTE (USA) INC., a New Jersey
`corporation,
`
`Defendants and
`Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
` 2021
`
` Ex. 2021-0001
`
`IPR Licensing, Inc.
`Exhibit .
`ZTE Corp v. IPR Licensing, Inc.
`IPR2014-00525
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 37516
`
`Instructions: Please answer each and every question on this verdict form.
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 7,190,966
`
`QUESTION N0.1:
`
`Do you find that InterDigital has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
`
`ZTE's accused phones infringe any ofthe following claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,190,966?
`
`NO (for ZTE)
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 3
`Claim 6
`Claim 8
`Claim 9
`Claim I 1
`
`YES Cf6r InterDigital)
`.1'/
`/ /
`/
`,//
`_,/L
`/
`
`2
`
` Ex. 2021-0002
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 37517
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 7,286,847
`
`QUESTION NO.2:
`
`Do you find that InterDigital has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
`
`ZTE's accused phones infringe any of the following claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,286,847?
`
`Claim 3
`Claim 5
`
`YES (~r InterDigital)
`,//
`,/
`
`NO (for ZTE)
`
`3
`
` Ex. 2021-0003
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 37518
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 8,380,244
`
`QUESTION NO.3:
`
`Do you find that InterDigital has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
`
`ZTE's accused phones infringe any of the following claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,244?
`
`Claim I
`Claim 8
`
`YES (fo)" lnterDigital)
`.//
`,/
`
`NO (for ZTE)
`
`4
`
` Ex. 2021-0004
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 37519
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 7,190,966
`
`QUESTION NO. 4:
`
`Do you find that ZTE has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
`
`following claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,190,966 are invalid as obvious?
`
`YES (for ZTE)
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 3
`Claim 6
`Claim 8
`Claim 9
`Claim 11
`
`NO (for lnt<7'Digital)
`,,.,·">
`Y/
`,7/
`7/
`/ /
`y'
`
`5
`
` Ex. 2021-0005
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 37520
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 7,286,847
`
`QUESTION NO. 5:
`
`Do you find that ZTE has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
`
`following claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,286,847 are invalid as obvious?
`
`YES (for ZTE)
`
`Claim 3
`Claim 5
`
`NO (for lnt~rl)igital)
`-v /
`7
`
`6
`
` Ex. 2021-0006
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00009-RGA Document 431 Filed 10/28/14 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 37521
`
`INTERDIGITAL'S U.S. PATENT NO. 8,380,244
`
`QUESTION NO. 6:
`
`Do you find that ZTE has proven by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
`
`following claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,380,244 are invalid as obvious?
`
`YES (for ZTE)
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 8
`
`NO (for InjerDigitalJ
`.. ~./
`/
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Foreperson should then sign and
`date the verdict form in the spaces below and notify the Court Security Officer that you
`have reached a verdict. The Foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and
`bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom.
`
`DATED: /0 r :k ~' , 2014
`,
`
`7
`
` Ex. 2021-0007
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
