`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 43
`Entered: April 16, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, and
`SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00518
`Patent 8,023,580 B2
`
`
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing Notice
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00518
`Patent 8,023,580 B2
`
`
`The Scheduling Order for this case set the date for oral argument on
`April 24, 2015, if oral argument is requested by the parties and granted by
`the Board. Paper 17. Petitioner and Patent Owner both requested oral
`argument. Papers 34, 35. Patent Owner also requested that oral argument
`for this case be consolidated with that for IPR2014-00519. Paper 35.
`The parties’ requests for oral argument are granted.
`A consolidated oral argument will be held for IPR2014-00518 and
`IPR2014-00519. Any argument made by a party at the consolidated oral
`argument will be useable only in a proceeding in which the record provides a
`proper foundation for making the argument.
`Each party will have ninety (90) minutes of total time to present
`arguments for the two proceedings. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of
`proof that Patent Owner’s patent claims at issue are unpatentable.
`Therefore, at oral argument, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case
`with respect to the challenged claims and grounds with respect to which the
`Board instituted trial in IPR2014-00518 and IPR2014-00519. Petitioner
`may reserve some of its argument time for rebuttal.
`Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation,
`having available to it the entirety of its allotted argument time. Finally,
`Petitioner may make use of the time it has reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s
`opposing presentation with regard to the challenged patent claims.
`The oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on April
`24, 2015, and will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00518
`Patent 8,023,580 B2
`
`served, basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and
`the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served three
`business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board two
`business days prior to the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference
`call with the Board at least one business days prior to the hearing to resolve
`any dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. Any
`dispute over the propriety of demonstrative exhibits that is not timely
`presented will be considered waived. The parties are directed to CBS
`Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, Paper
`118 (October 23, 2013), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative
`exhibits.
`
`If any evidence is confidential or under seal, counsel for each party
`shall be mindful not to, at oral argument, reveal such confidential or sealed
`information. Instead, the counsel for the parties shall make reference to such
`information without actually disclosing the information. If either party
`objects to this manner of handling confidential or sealed information at oral
`argument, it shall initiate a joint conference call with the Board at least three
`business days prior to the date of oral argument, to discuss the matter.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`equipment are to be made 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`At least one member of the panel will be attending the oral argument
`remotely via electronic audio/visual communication equipment. The Board
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00518
`Patent 8,023,580 B2
`
`expects lead counsel for each party to be present at hearing, although any
`backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part. If any
`lead counsel will not be in attendance at hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than three business
`days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`J. Steven Baughman
`Daniel G. Cardy
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`cardyd@dicksteinshapiro.com
`gabrielle.higgins@ropesgray.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Thomas Engellenner
`Reza Mollaaghababa
`Lana Gladstein
`engellennert@pepperlaw.com
`mollaagababar@pepperlaw.com
`gladsteinl@pepperlaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
