throbber

`
`Communication
`
`
`
`
`Systems
`Engineering
`
`John G. Proakis
`
`Masoud Salehi
`
`Northeastern University
`
`PRENTICE HALL, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 201 2
`
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 2012
`
`

`

`Library of Congress Cataloging-iml’ublication Data
`Proakis, John G.
`Communication systems engineering / John G. Proakis, Masoud
`Salehi.
`cm.
`p.
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-13-158932-6
`l. Telecommunication.
`TK5101.P75 1994
`621.382—dc20
`
`I. Salehi, Masoud.
`
`II. Title.
`
`93-23109
`CIP
`
`Acquisitions editor: DON FOWLEY
`Production editor: IRWIN ZUCKER
`Production coordinator: DAVID DICKEY
`Supplements editor: ALICE DWORKIN
`Copy editors: JOHN COOK and ANNA HALASZ
`Cover design: DESIGN SOLUTIONS
`Editorial assistant: JENNIFER KLEIN
`
`
`
`© 1994 by Prentice-Hall, Inc.
`A Paramount Communications Company
`Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this book may be
`reproduced, in any form or by any means,
`without pemtission in writing from the publisher.
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`10987654321
`
`ISBN 0-].3-1156'132-[3
`
`Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, London
`Prentice-Hall of Australia Pty. Limited, Sydney
`Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Toronto
`Prentice-Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A., Mexico
`Prentice—Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi
`Prentice-Hall of Japan, Inc., Tokyo
`Simon & Schuster Asia Pte. Ltd., Singapore
`Editora Prentice-Hall do Brasil, Ltda., Rio de Janeiro
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 201 2
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 2012
`
`

`

`Sec. 9.2
`
`Carrier-Phase Modulation
`
`643
`
`The M-phase decision-feedback tracking loop also has a phase ambiguity
`of 27r/M. necessitating the need for differentially encoding the information se-
`quence prior to transmission and differentially decoding the received sequence at
`the detector to recover the information.
`
`9.2.4 Differential-Phase Modulation and Domodulotion
`
`The performance of ideal. coherent phase modulation/demodulation is closely at-
`tained in communication systems that
`transmit a carrier-signal along with the
`information signal. The carrier signal component may be filtered from the received
`signal and used to perform phase-coherent demodulation. However. when no sepa-
`rate carrier signal is transmitted. the receiver must estimate the carrier phase from
`the received signal. As indicated in the preceding section. the phase at the output of
`a PLL has ambiguities of multiples of Zn / M . necessitating the need to differentially
`encode the data prior to modulation. This differential encoding allows us to decode
`the received data at the detector in the presence of the phase ambiguities.
`In differential encoding. the information is conveyed by phase shifts relative
`to the previous signal
`interval. For example.
`in binary phase modulation the in-
`formation bit
`I may be transmitted by shifting the phase of the carrier by 180
`relative to the previous carrier phase. while the information hit 0 is transmitted
`by a zero-phase shift relative to the phase in the preceding signaling interval.
`In
`four-phase modulation.
`the relative phase shifts between successive intervals are
`0°.90“. l80’. and 270“. corresponding to the information bits 00.0l. l l. l0.
`re-
`spectively. The generalization of differential encoding for M > 4 is straightforward.
`The phase-modulated signals resulting from this encoding process are called dif-
`ferentially encoded. The encoding is performed by a relatively simple logic circuit
`preceding the modulator.
`Demodulation and detection of the differentially encoded phase-modulated
`signal may be performed as described in the preceding section using the output of
`a PLL to perform the demodulation. The received signal phase (-9, = tan"' rz/r. at
`the detector is mapped into one of the M possible transmitted signal phases [0...]
`that is closest to 8,. Following the detector is a relatively simple phase comparator
`that compares the phases of the detected signal over two consecutive intervals to
`extract the transmitted information. Thus. phase ambiguities of 27r/ M are rendered
`irrelevant.
`
`Coherent demodulation of differentially encoded phase-modulated signals
`results in a higher probability of error than the error probability derived for absolute-
`phase encoding. With difl'erentially encoded signals. an error in the detected phase
`due to noise will frequently result in decoding errors over two consecutive signaling
`intervals. This is especially the case for error probabilities below l0". Therefore.
`the probability of error for differentially encoded M-ary-phase-modulated signals
`is approximately twice the probability of error for M -ary-phase modulation with
`absolute phase encoding. However. a factor-of-Z increase in the error probability
`translates into a relatively small loss in SNR. as can be seen from Figure 9.l5.
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 201 2
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 2012
`
`

`

`644
`
`Digital Transmission via Carrier Modulation
`
`Chap. 9
`
`A differentially encoded phase-modulated signal also allows another type of
`demodulation that does not require the estimation of the carrier phase. Instead. the
`received signal
`in any given signaling interval
`is compared to the phase of the
`received signal from the preceding signaling interval. To elaborate. suppose that we
`demodulate the differentially encoded signal by multiplying r(r) with cos 2n [,1 and
`sin 21rfct and integrating the two products over the interval 1‘. At the k‘“ signaling
`interval, the demodulater output is
`
`I} = J'Zt’lm'
`
`.) + II;
`
`(9.14”
`
`is the phase angle of the transmitted signal at the k'h signaling interval. 4:
`where 0.
`is the carrier phase. and m = n... + jn.I is the noise vector. Similarly. the received
`signal vector at the output of the demodulator in the preceding signaling interval is
`
`n I = J'Ef’m'
`
`. at +m l
`
`(9.2.42)
`
`The decision variable for the phase detector is the phase difference between these
`two complex numbers. Equivalently. we can project n onto r.
`I and use the phase
`of the resulting complex number; that is.
`
`n5".l = Lew“ "‘ " + firm“ "m I
`
`+ J'Le ’"" ' ”In +nm; I
`
`(9.2.43)
`
`.. Thus. the mean
`which. in the absence of noise. yields the phase difference (I. —0.
`value of fir},
`is independent of the carrier phase. Differentially encoded PSK
`signaling that is demodulated and detected as described above is called diflc'renlial
`PSK (DPSK).
`The demodulation and detection of DSPK using matched filters is illustrated
`in Figure 9.l8. If the pulse gr“) is rectangular. the matched lilters may be replaced
`by integrate-and-dump filters.
`
`
`
`FIGURE 9.18. Block diagram of DPSK demodulator.
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 201 2
`
`REMBRANDT EXHIBIT 2012
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket