throbber
HJU104000
`
`PAGELJ
`
`|—‘
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`(fl
`
`6
`
`ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY
`
`HJUlO4000
`
`MARKUP OF H.R. 1249, TH
`
`2
`
`*RICA INVENTS ACT
`
`Thursday, April 14, 2011
`
`House of Representatives
`
`Committee on the Judiciary
`
`7 Washington, D.C.
`
`8
`
`9
`
`_0
`
`ll
`
`_2
`
`_3
`
`The committee met, pursuant to call, at 10:35 a.m.,
`
`in
`
`Room 2141, Rayburn Office Building, Hon. Lamar Smith
`
`[chairman of the committee] presiding.
`
`Present: Representatives Smith, Sensenbrenner, Coble,
`
`Gallegly, Goodlatte, Lungren, Chabot, Issa, Pence, Forbes,
`
`King, Franks, Gohmert, Jordan, Poe, Chaffetz, Griffin,
`
`_4 Marino, Gowdy, Ross, Adams, Quayle, Conyers, Berman, Nadler,
`
`_5
`
`_6
`
`_7
`
`Scott, Watt, Lofgren, Jackson Lee, Waters, Cohen, Johnson,
`
`Pierluisi, Quigley, Chu, Deutch, Sanchez, and Wasserman
`
`Schultz.
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_001
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGELJ
`
`[\)
`
`18
`
`Staff present:
`
`Sean McLaughlin, Chief of Staff;
`
`19 Allison Halatei, Deputy Chief of Staff/Parliamentarian;
`
`Sarah Kish, Clerk; Perry Apelbaum, Minority Staff Director;
`
`and Chrystal Sheppard.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_002
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGE
`
`3
`
`23
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`[Presiding] The Judiciary Committee
`
`24 will come to order.
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`
`40
`
`41
`
`42
`
`43
`
`44
`
`Without objection,
`
`the chair is authorized to declare
`
`recesses of the committee at any time.
`
`The c_erk will call the role to establish a quorum.
`
`Ms. Kish. Mr. Smith?
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`Present
`
`Vs. Kish. Mr. Sensenbrenner?
`
`Vr. Sensenbrenner. Here.
`
`Vs. Kish. Mr. Coble?
`
`Vr. Gallegly?
`
`Vr. Goodlatte?
`
`Vr. Lungren?
`
`Vr. Chabot?
`
`Vr.
`
`Issa?
`
`Vr. Pence?
`
`r. Forbes?
`
`Vr. King?
`
`Vr. Franks?
`
`Vr. Gohmert?
`
`Vr. Gohmert. Here
`
`Vs. Kish. Mr. Jordan?
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_003
`
`

`
`HJUl04000
`
`PAGE
`
`4
`
`45
`
`46
`
`47
`
`48
`
`49
`
`50
`
`51
`
`52
`
`53
`
`54
`
`55
`
`56
`
`57
`
`58
`
`59
`
`60
`
`61
`
`62
`
`63
`
`64
`
`65
`
`66
`
`Vr. Poe?
`
`Vr. Chaffetz?
`
`Vr. Griffin?
`
`Vr. Marino?
`
`Vr. Gowdy?
`
`Vr. Ross?
`
`Vs. Adams?
`
`Vr. Quayle?
`
`Vr. Conyers?
`
`Vr. Berman?
`
`Vr. Nadler?
`
`Vr. Scott?
`
`Vr. Watt?
`
`Vr. Watt. Present.
`
`Vs. Kish. Ms. Lofgren?
`
`Vs. Lofgren. Present.
`
`s. Kish. Ms. Jackson Lee?
`
`Vs. Jackson Lee.
`
`Present.
`
`Vs. Kish. Ms. Waters?
`
`Vr. Cohen?
`
`Vr. Johnson?
`
`Vr. Pierluisi?
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_004
`
`

`
`HJUl04000
`
`PAGE
`
`5
`
`67
`
`68
`
`69
`
`70
`
`71
`
`72
`
`73
`
`74
`
`75
`
`76
`
`77
`
`78
`
`79
`
`80
`
`81
`
`82
`
`83
`
`84
`
`85
`
`86
`
`87
`
`88
`
`Vr. Quigley?
`
`Vr. Quigley. Here.
`
`Vs. Kish. Ms. Chu?
`
`Vs. Chu. Present.
`
`Vs. Kish. Mr. Deutch?
`
`Vs. Sanchez?
`
`Vs. Wasserman Schultz?
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`The gentleman from Arizona?
`
`Mr. Quayle. Here.
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`The gentleman from Illinois? Oh,
`
`have you recorded yourself? Okay.
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`How is the gentleman from Michigan
`
`the gentlewoman from California recorded?
`
`Ms. Kish. Not recorded, sir.
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`The gentlewoman from California?
`
`Ms. Sanchez. Present.
`
`Chairman Smith. And the gentleman from Michigan?
`
`Mr. Conyers. Present.
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`Is present.
`
`The c_erk will report.
`
`Ms. Kish. Mr. Chairman,
`
`l5 m mb rs r spond d pr s nt.
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`A working quorum is present and we
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_005
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGELJ
`
`(5\
`
`89 will proceed.
`
`Pursuant to notice,
`
`I now call up H.R. 1249 for
`
`purposes of markup.
`
`The clerk will report the bill.
`
`Ms. Kish.
`
`“H.R. 1249,
`
`to amend Title 35, United
`
`States Code,
`
`to provide for patent reform.”
`
`Chairman Smith. Without objection,
`
`the bill will be
`
`considered as read.
`
`[The information follows:]
`
`90
`
`91
`
`92
`
`93
`
`94
`
`95
`
`96
`
`97
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_006
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGE
`
`72
`
`_l30
`
`I will recognize myself in opposition to the
`
`_13l
`
`amendment.
`
`_Z32
`
`This amendment expands the inter partes review program
`
`_Z33
`
`from 12 months after the fillng of a civil action to 30 days
`
`_Z34
`
`after the Markman hearing.
`
`"his amendment could create an
`
`_Z35
`
`open—ended process because there is actually no guarantee
`
`_l36
`
`that a Markman hearing will
`
`v n tak plac .
`
`"h
`
`int r
`
`_Z37
`
`partes proceeding in H.R.
`
`l249 has been carefully written to
`
`l138
`
`balance the need to encourage its use while at same time
`
`_139
`
`preventing the serial harassment of patent holders. This
`
`_Zl0
`
`bill represents a delicate balance, and making such a core
`
`llll
`
`change to the deadline may turn the inter partes program
`
`_ZZ2
`
`into a tool for litigation gamesmanship rather than a
`
`_Zl3 meaningful and less expensive alternative to litigation.
`
`_1l4
`
`lZZ5
`
`For those reasons,
`
`I oppose the amendment.
`
`Are there other members who wish to be heard on this
`
`_1l6
`
`amendment?
`
`_117
`
`_Zl8
`
`[No response.]
`
`Chairman Smith.
`
`If not, we will vote on it. All
`
`_Zl9
`
`those in —— the gentleman from California, Mr. Berman,
`
`is
`
`_Z50
`
`recognized.
`
`_Z5l
`
`Mr. Berman. Mr. Chairman,
`
`the issue you raise —— I
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_007
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGE
`
`91
`
`_830
`
`partes is designed so that you bring your best arguments in.
`
`_83l
`
`The program forces the party to make a decision, and if you
`
`_832
`
`decide to initiate inter partes, you need to bring in your A
`
`_833
`
`game.
`
`Inter partes review is not meant to simply be a
`
`_834
`
`program that you can use to harass a patent owner.
`
`For it
`
`_835
`
`to truly be a meaningful and cheaper alternative to
`
`_836
`
`litigation, we must maintain the higher threshold. And for
`
`_837
`
`those reasons,
`
`I oppose the amendment.
`
`;838
`
`Are there other members who wish to be heard on the
`
`_839
`
`amendment?
`
`The
`
`gentleman from California, Mr. Berman?
`
`_8l0
`
`Mr. Berman. Yes, Mr. Chairman.
`
`I want to speak in
`
`_8ll
`
`favor of the Chu amendment.
`
`The Patent Office has made it
`
`_8Z2
`
`quite clear that the threshold proposed by the Chu
`
`_8l3
`
`amendment, as opposed to the one in the current bill and in
`
`_8l4
`
`the Senate bill,
`
`is something they can work with very
`
`I815
`
`easily.
`
`They have been working with that threshold all the
`
`_8l6
`
`time.
`
`_817
`
`One of the major purposes of patent reform was to have
`
`_8l8
`
`a process that allowed our concern about bad patents having
`
`_8l9
`
`been issued to be reexamined and to avoid all the costs of
`
`_850
`
`litigation.
`
`The current _anguage on the threshold is too
`
`_85l
`
`restrictive in terms of a_lowing those patents to be
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_008
`
`

`
`HJUlO4000
`
`PAGE
`
`221
`
`1522
`
`Mr. Conyers.
`
`Permit me to announce that we are losing
`
`1523
`
`Dr. Chrystal Sheppard, wqo has been with us three and a half
`
`1524
`
`years, sitting to my left.
`
`She is the only lawyer that I
`
`1525
`
`know that has a Ph.D.
`
`in molecular bio_ogy. And she goes to
`
`1526
`
`the University of Nebraska's law schoo_. And we will miss
`
`1527
`
`her very, very much.
`
`1528
`
`1529
`
`1530
`
`1531
`
`1532
`
`Chairman Smith. We wish her well.
`
`[Applause.]
`
`Chairman Smith. Good luck, my dear.
`
`Ms. Sheppard.
`
`Thank you.
`
`Chairman Smith. And that is a good conclusion. And,
`
`1533
`
`in fact, we are adjourned.
`
`Z534
`
`[Whereupon, at 4:19 p.m.,
`
`the committee was
`
`1535
`
`adjourned.]
`
`DMC Exhibit 2124_009

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket