`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Date: September 25, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TARGET CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00509
`Patent RE43,531 E
`
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FITZPATRICK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Denying Motion for Joinder
`35 U.S.C. 315(c)
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00509
`Patent RE43,531 E
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Target Corporation filed a corrected Petition (“Petition”) for
`an inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 15–19, and 24–291 of U.S.
`Patent No. RE43,531 E (the “’531 patent”). Paper 9. Petitioner previously
`filed two other petitions for inter partes reviews of different, yet
`overlapping, subsets of claims of the ’531 patent. We instituted trial in both
`of those proceedings: IPR2013-00532 and IPR2013-00533 (“the pending
`trials”). Collectively, we instituted trial on all but two of the claims of the
`’531 patent that Petitioner had challenged in the pending trials. See Paper 10
`in IPR2013-00532 (instituting trial on all of challenged claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10,
`11, and 15–17); Paper 11 in IPR2013-00533 (instituting trial on challenged
`claims 1 and 24–29 but not on challenged claims 18 and 19).
`Concurrently with the filing of its instant Petition, Petitioner filed a
`motion for joinder pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 315(c). Paper 3, 1. Specifically,
`Petitioner Target Corp. seeks to have the instant “Petition . . . joined with the
`instituted inter partes review, Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp.,
`IPR2013-00533.” Id.
`Section 315(c) authorizes joinder of a person, not a petition, to an
`instituted inter partes review. It does not provide a mechanism for joining
`Target’s petition here to the instituted IPR2013-00533.2
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for joinder is denied.
`
`
`1 Petitioner subsequently filed a motion to limit the claims being challenged
`by its Petition to only claims 1, 18, and 19. Paper 7.
`2 Our detailed analysis of 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) is provided in a decision
`denying Petitioner Target’s motion for joinder in IPR2014-00508.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case IPR2014-00509
`Patent RE43,531 E
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Norman Hedges
`norman.hedges@faegrebd.com
`
`Trevor Carter
`trevor.carter@faegrebd.com
`
`Daniel Lechleiter
`daniel.lechleiter.ptab@faegrebd.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Paul Taufer
`paul.taufer@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`Michael Burns
`Michael.Burns@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`Stuart Pollack
`stuart.pollack@dlapiper.com