throbber
United States Patent [191
`Bartolo et al.
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`US005202048A
`5,202,048
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent: Apr. 13, 1993
`
`[54] PERSONAL CLEANSING PRODUCI' WITH
`ODOR COMPATIBLE BULKY AMINE
`CATIONIC POLYMER WITH REDUCED
`ODOR CHARACI'ERISTICS
`Inventors: Robert G. Bartolo, Cincinnati; Louis
`F. Wong, Mason, both of Ohio
`[73] Assignee: The Procter&: Gamble Company,
`Cincinnati, Ohio
`
`(75]
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 816,523
`[22] Filed:
`Dec. 30, 1991
`
`[51]
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`[63] Continuation of Ser. No. 374,315, Jun. 30, 1989, aban(cid:173)
`doned.
`Int. CJ.s ......................... A61K 7/50; CllD 3/37;
`C11D 3/46; CUD 13/18.
`[52] U.S. CI ..................................... 252/117; 252/121;
`252/132; 252/134; 252/174; 252/174~ 15;
`252/174.17; 252/174.23; 252/544; 252/547;
`252/DIG. 2; 252/DIG. 5; 252/DIG. 14;
`252/DIG. 16; 424/70; 424/78.03
`[58] Field of Search ............... 252/117, 132, 547, 544,
`252/174.23, 174.15, 174.17, DIG. 2, DIG. 5,
`DIG. 14; 424/70, 78
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2,876,217 3/1959 Paschall ........................... 260/233.3
`3,589,978 6/1971 Kamal et al ......................... 162/158
`4,061,602 12/1977 Oberstar et al ..................... 252/547
`4,298,494 11/1981 Parslow et al ................. 252/174.16
`4,454,060 6/1984 Lai et al .............................. 252/547
`4,477,375 10/1984 Grollier ............................... 252/542
`
`4,540,507 9/1985 Grollier .......................... 252/174.23
`4,663,159 5/1987 Brode, II et al ...................... 424/70
`4,678,606 7/1987 Akhter et al ........................ 252/542
`4,704,224 11/1987 Saud .................................... 252/132
`4,710,314 12/1987 Madrange et al ................... 252/117
`4,714,563 12/1987 Kajs et al ............................ 252/107
`4,758,282 7/1988 Stober et al ........................... 127/34
`4,764,365 8/1988 Boothe et al ......................... 424/81
`4,820,447 4/1989 Medcalf et al ...................... 252/117
`4,832,872 5/1989 Scandel ............................... 252/547
`4,874,538 10/1989 Dawson et al ...................... 252/117
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`1136842 12/1968 United Kingdom .
`
`Primary Examiner-Dennis Albrecht
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Betty J. Zea; Leonard
`Williamson; Robert B. Aylor
`
`[57]
`ABSTRACI'
`Persou'al. cleansing ~omposltio~ contunmg sulfactant
`and selected cationic polymer provide products having
`improved odor stability. This "bulky amine" cationic
`is:
`polymer
`Guar
`(POLYMER)(cid:173)
`CRIHCR2R3-CH2NR4RSR6 wherein Rl-R3 is a -H
`or -OH substituent, and wherein at least one ofR4, RS
`and R6 are selected from the group consisting of alkyl
`having a chain length of from about 2 to about 24 car(cid:173)
`bon atoms, and alkoxy alkyl containing from about 2 to
`about 12 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof. The cati(cid:173)
`onic polymer is less odoriferous than trimethylamine(cid:173)
`based cationic polymers. The personal cleansing com(cid:173)
`position ash a pH of at least 7.5 in a 1% aqueous solu(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`8 Claims, No Drawings
`
`1
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,202,048
`
`2
`All of the above patents are hereby incorporated
`herein by reference, especially their for basic personal
`cleansing product and quat polymer disclosures.
`
`PERSONAL CLEANSING PRODUCI' WITH ODOR
`COMPATIBLE BULKY AMINE CATIONIC
`POLYMER WITH REDUCED ODOR
`CHARACI'ERISTICS
`
`This is a continuation of application Ser. No.
`07/374,315, filed on Jun. 30, 1989, now abandoned.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`This invention pertains to personal cleansing compo(cid:173)
`sitions for personal washing, which compositions com(cid:173)
`prise quaternary amine polymers.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a personal cleansing
`product made with a selected quaternized cationic poly(cid:173)
`mer wherein each quaternary ammonium moiety is
`derived from a bulky amine. The preferred product is a
`10 toilet bar.

`OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
`An object of the present invention is to provide an
`improved toilet bar, preferably a soap bar, comprising a
`15 cationic polymeric skin conditioning agent which does
`not comprise a potential odoriferous amine moiety.
`Other objects will become apparent from the detailed
`description below.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Liquid and solid bar compositions based on soap
`and/or synthetic surfactants are commonly used for
`cleansing the human body. A wide variety of additives
`have been suggested for inclusion in said compositions. 20
`Some enhance the physical properties, e.g., bar hard-
`ness, wear rate, resistance to water. Others enhance the
`in-use properties such as lather characteristics and some
`The present invention . comp~ basic personal
`cleansing compositions comprising from about 0.2% to
`impact on the ilirprcision the comp<)sition has on the
`25 about 5% by weight selected cationic polymer wherein
`skin both during washing (bar feel) and afterwards.
`each cationic group is derived from: a "bulky" amine.
`It has been discovered that the addition of certain
`Compared to personal cleansing compositions which
`polymeric materials to such liquids and bars can have a
`beneficial skin mildness effect for the use~ without dele-
`are prepared with cationic polymers which comprise a
`teriously affecting other product properties: In g~ner~,
`potential labile amine moiety, e.g., trimethylamine-
`the useful polymers should be soluble or diSpersible m 30 based cationic polymers, the compositions of this inven-
`water to a level of at least 1% ?Y weight, preferabl~ at
`tion consistently exhibit superior odor stability due to
`least 5% by weight at 25" C. Swtable polymers are high
`the selected "bulky amine" cationic polymers. The term
`molecular wei¥ht mate~als (mass-ave~age molec~ar
`"basic personal cleansing compositions" as used herein
`weight determmed, for Instance, by light scattermg,
`means that the composition has a pH of at least about
`being generally from about 20,000 to about 5,000,000, 35 7.5, preferably at least about 8.5.
`preferably from about 50,000 to about 4,000,000, and
`While not being bound to any theory, illustrations A
`more preferably from a~ut 5?<J,OOO. t~ about 3,000,000)
`and B show the theoretical degradation of labile amine
`~d pr~ferably have a thick~nmg ability su~h that a I%
`containing cationic polymers in a basic environment.
`dispersion of the polymer m water at 20 C. exceeds
`Generic degradation:
`about 1 PaS(lO poise) at a shear rate of 10-2 sec-I 40
`Useful polymers are the cationic, nonionic, amphoteric,
`and anionic polymers useful in the cosmetic field. Pre(cid:173)
`ferred are cationic and nonionic resins and mixtures
`where R can be meant to represent any group (e.g., H,
`thereof. Highly preferred are the cationic resins.
`To date the preferred cationic polymers include cati- 45 OH, alkyl chain); e.g.,
`onic guar gums such as hydroxyproxyltrimethylam(cid:173)
`monium guar gum.
`However, it has been discovered that there is an odor
`problem with using such "cationic trimethylamine
`quaternized polymers" in compositions having a pH of 50
`7.5 or above. They break down and release odoriferous
`labile amines.
`Odoriferous labile amines are detectable at levels as
`low as 2 ppb. Personal cleansing products containing
`odoriferous quaternary amine polymers are disclosed in 55
`one or more of the following patents:
`
`Polymer-CHR-CH2-N+(CH3h·
`-polymer-CR=CH2+N(CH3)3
`
`Guar-CH2-0-CH2-C-H(OH)-CH-
`2-N+(CH3)3-Guar-CH2-0-CH2
`C(OH)=CH2 +N(CHJh
`
`(A)
`
`(B)
`
`The extent of this degradation and the effect of it on
`product odor were not appreciated heretofore. The
`level of hydration required to cause a problem is very
`low and therefore it is extremely difficult to detect and
`identify the offending material.
`
`60
`
`The Bulky Amine Cationic Polymers
`Bulky amine polymers are defmed herein as POLY(cid:173)
`MERS with the following non-labile cationic functional
`group:
`(POLYMER)-CRIH-CR2R3-NR4RSR6
`(I)
`wherein R'-R3is H or any other substituent and R4, RS
`and R 6 combine with N to form a pendant amine which
`when free has less odor impact than trimethylamine,
`65 preferably at least one of R4, RS and R6 is alkyl having
`a chain length of from about 2 to about 24 carbon atoms,
`or an alkoxy alkyl group containing from about 2 to
`about 12 carbon atoms.
`
`_ _.:~.:.:.::; ___ __::::::-----::..;.;;.;;.~~--
`
`2
`
`

`

`3
`Some examples of preferred bulky amine polymers
`are cationic guar gums having the following structures;
`
`5,202,048
`
`4
`The boiling points of some exemplary substituted
`amines are set out in Table 1.
`TABLE 1
`
`C12H2s
`I
`Guar-CH2-0-CH2-CH(OH)-CH2-N+CH3
`I
`CH3
`
`(II) 5
`
`Eliminated Amine
`
`Boiling Point/'C.
`
`3
`
`Labile Amine
`Trimethylamine
`Bulky Amine
`36
`Dimethylethylamine
`63
`Methyldiethylamine
`89
`Triethylamine
`19S
`Dimethyloctylamine
`ISS
`Dimethylcyclohexylamine
`183
`Dimethylbenzylamine
`133
`Dimethylethanolamine
`An example of a bulky amine hydroxyethyl cellulose 15 __ Dieth_· _.;..yl_ethan __ o_lamn_e ________ ,_61 ____ _
`(HEC) polymer is:
`
`CH2CH~H (Ill) 10
`I
`Guar-CH2-0-CH2-CH(OH)-CH2-N+CH3
`I
`CH3
`
`(IV)
`
`Ct2H2s
`I
`HEC-CH2-0-CH2-CH(OH)-CH2-N+CH3
`I
`CH3
`
`For a homologous series of compounds (e.g., tri-sub(cid:173)
`stituted amines), volatility decreases with increasing
`molecular weight. Volatility is dependent, among other
`20 things on the boiling point of the neat component. Odor
`impact also has a strong dependence on the amount of
`volatilized material that reaches the nose. Table 1 dem(cid:173)
`These "bulky amine': groups add additional complex(cid:173)
`onstrates the significant effect which .adding "bulky".
`ity to the preparation of the polymer and the finished
`groups has on volatility and, hence, odor impact of
`compositions. They would not be used, except for the 25
`amines. For pure hydrocarbon substitution, the larger
`existence of the odor problem with the trimethylamine
`the alkyl chains (or the larger than degree oflong chain
`derived polymer. They may also have improved skin
`substitution) the lower the odor impact. Thus, bulky
`conditioning benefits.
`amines have boiling points of greater than ambient tem(cid:173)
`The composition of this invention preferably com(cid:173)
`perature, and preferably at least about 30" C., more
`preferably more than about so· c.
`prises from about 0.2% to about 5%, preferably from 30
`about 0.5% to about 2%, of the cationic polymer. The
`The Surfactant Component
`average molecular weight of the preferred cationic guar
`gum is from about 50,000 to about 1,000,000, preferably
`The surfactant component of the present composi-
`from about 100,000 to about SOO,OOO, and more prefera-
`tions comprises alkali metal soap or synthetic surfactant
`bly from about 250,000 to about 400,000 and the degree 35 or mixtures thereof.
`Alkali metal soaps can be made by direct saponifica-
`of substitution is from about 0.5 to about 4, preferably
`from about 1 to about 2.5. Some preferred cationic
`tion of the fats and oils or by the neutralization of the
`guars (galactomannans) are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
`free fatty acids which are prepared in a separate manu-
`4,758,282, Stober et al., issued Jul. 19, 1988, incorpo-
`facturing process. Particularly useful are the sodium
`rated herein by reference. The cationic guar gum poly- -40 and potassium salts of the mixtures of fatty acids de-
`rived from coconut oil and tallow, i.e., sodium and
`mers disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent appli-
`cation Ser. No. 07/266,039, J. R. Knochel and P. E.
`.
`tall
`d
`Vest, filed Nov. 2, 1988, would be suitable when the
`potassium
`ow an coconut soaps.
`cationic groups are substituted with bulky amine
`The term "tallow" is used herein in connection with
`groups.
`45 fatty acid mixtures which typically have an approxi-
`mate carbon chain length distribution of 2.5% c 149 29%
`Other bulky amine cationic polymeric skin condition-
`C!6, 23% c,s, 2% palmitoleic, 41.5% oleic and 3%
`ing agents useful in the present invention have molecu-
`Jar weights of from 1,000 to 3,000,000. Useful polymers
`linoleic. (The first three fatty acids listed are saturated.)
`Other ~tur~ with similar _distrib~tion, such as the
`are selected from the group consisting of:
`50 fatty &CJds denved from vanous animal tallows. The
`(I) cationic polysaccharides;
`(II) cationic copolymers of saccharides and synthetic
`tallow can also be hardened (i.e., hydrogenated) to
`cationic monomers, and
`convert part or all of the unsaturated fatty acid moieties
`(III) synthetic polymers selected from the group con-
`to saturated fatty acid moieties.
`sisting of any other synthetic polymer containing
`When the terms "coconut oil" and "eoconut fatty
`pendant quaternary amine groups, e.g., quaternized 55 acid" (CNFA) are used herein, they refer to fatty acid
`silicones and quaternized methacrylates.
`mixtures which typically have an approximate carbon
`chain length distribution of about 8% c,, 7% C10, 48%
`Specific examples of members of the bulky amine
`C12, 17% C14, 9% C16o 2% Cu, 7% oleic, and 2% lin-
`cationic polysaccharide class include the cationic hdy-
`oleic. (The first six fatty acids listed are saturated.)
`roxyethyl cellulose, e.g., LM-200 made by Union Car-
`bide Corporation.
`60 Other sources having similar carbon chain length distri-
`bution such as palm kernel oil and babassu kernel oil are
`The cationic copolymers of saccharides and synthetic
`cationic monomers useful in the present invention en-
`included with the terms coconut oil and coconut fatty
`compass those containing the following saccharides:
`acid.
`glucose, galactose, mannose, arabinose, xylose, fucose,
`A preferred soap bar of this invention comprises soap
`fructose, glucosamine, galactosamine, glucuronic acid, 65 as its primary or sole surfactant It also contains as an
`galacturonic acid, and 5 or 6 membered ring polyalco-
`essential ingredient a skin conditioning amount of a
`bois. Also included are hydroxymethyl, hydroxyethyl
`hydrated, cationic guar gum provided by a cationic
`guar gum polymer. This polymer is uniformly distrib-
`and hydroxypropyl derivatives of the above sugars.
`
`3
`
`

`

`5,202,048
`
`5
`uted in the soap bar matrix without affecting the smooth
`feel of the dry or wet bar.
`Another preferred toilet bar is based on mild syn(cid:173)
`thetic surfactants as disclosed in commonly assigned
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,525, Small et al., issued Jun. 16, s
`1987, incorporated herein by reference.
`Synthetic detergents can also be present in composi(cid:173)
`tions herein. Preferred types of synthetic detergents are
`of the anionic or nonionic type. Examples of anionic
`synthetic detergents are the salts of organic sulfuric
`reaction products such as
`alkyl sulfates having the formula R240S03M;
`alkyl sulfonates having the formula R24S03M;
`alkyl ether sulfates having the formula R24(0C2l4)x.
`OS03M;
`alkyl mono glyceride sulfonates having the formula
`
`15
`
`6
`antibacterial agents can be included in the present com(cid:173)
`positions at levels of from about 0.5% to about 4%.
`Typical antibacterial agents which are suitable for use
`herein are 3,4-di and 3,4',5-tribromosalicyla-anildes;
`4,4' -dichloro-3-(trifluoromethyl)carbanilide; 3,4,4' -tri(cid:173)
`chlorocarbanilide and mixtures of these materials. Con(cid:173)
`ventional nonionic emoliients can be included as addi(cid:173)
`tional skin conditioning agents in the compositions of
`the present invention at levels up to about 40%, prefera-
`10 bly at levels of from about 1% to about 25%. Such
`materials include, for example, mineral oils, paraffm
`wax having a melting point of from about 100" F., fatty
`sorbitan esters (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,988,255, Seiden,
`issued Oct. 26, 1976, incorporated by reference herein),
`lanolin and lanolin derivatives, esters such as isopropyl
`myristate and triglycerides such as coconut oil or hy(cid:173)
`drogenated tallow.
`Free fatty acid such as coconut fatty acid can be
`added to the compositions herein to improve the vol-
`20 ume and quality (creaminess) of the lather produced by
`the compositions herein.
`Conventional perfumes, dyes and pigments can also
`be incorporated into compositions of. the invention at
`levels up to about 5%. Perfumes are preferably used at
`levels of from about 0.5% to 3% and dyes and pigments
`are preferably used at levels of from about 0.001% to
`about 0.5%.
`
`R240
`
`H
`I
`CH
`I
`CHO
`I
`H-C-H
`·I
`X
`
`H
`
`y
`
`and alkyl benzene sulfonates having the formula
`
`25
`
`30
`
`In the above formulae, R24 is a straight or branched
`chain alkyl of from about 8 to about 24 carbon atoms; M 35
`is an alkali metal or ammonium ion; x is a number of
`from 1 to about 10; y is a number offrom 1 to 4; and X
`is selected from the group consisting of chlorine, hy(cid:173)
`droxyl, and - S03M, at least one X in each molecule
`being - S03M. Examples of nonionic synthetic deter- 40
`gents are ethoxylated fatty alcohols (e.g., the reaction
`product of one mole of coconut fatty alcohol with from
`about 3 to about 30 moles of ethylene oxide) and fatty
`acid amides such as coconut fatty acid monoethanolam(cid:173)
`ide and stearic acid diethanolamide. Although it may be 45
`desirable in some instances to incorporate synthetic
`detergents into the compositions of the present inven(cid:173)
`tion, the compositions herein can be free of synthetic
`detergents. Preferred are the mild synthetic surfactants
`disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,525, Small et al., issued so
`Jun. 16, 1987, incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Insoluble Alkaline Earth Metal Soaps
`Insoluble alkaline earth metal soaps such as calcium
`stearate and magnesium stearate can also be incorpo- 55
`rated into compositions of the present invention at lev(cid:173)
`els up to about 30%. These materials are particularly
`useful in toilet bars in which synthetic detergents are
`present in that they tend to reduce the relatively high
`solubility which such bars normally have. These alka- 60
`line earth metal soaps are not included within the term
`"soap" as otherwise used in this specification. The term
`"soap" as used herein refers to the alkali metal soaps.
`
`Optional Components
`The compositions of the present invention can con(cid:173)
`tain optional components such as those conventionally
`found in personal cleansing products. Conventional
`
`65
`
`Bar Preparation
`Toilet bars of the present invention can be prepared
`in any conventional manner. E.g., the bulky amine cati(cid:173)
`onic polymer can be added to noodles of the base soap
`mixture containing from about 10% to about 22% mois(cid:173)
`ture in an amalgamator. Any optional ingredients such
`as perfumes, dyes, etc., are also added to the amalgama(cid:173)
`tor. The mixture is processed in the amalgamator and
`milled in the conventional manner under conventional
`conditions. It is then extruded (plodded) into logs for
`cutting and stamping into toilet bars.
`In a method of making the bar of the present inven(cid:173)
`tion, the bulky amine cationic polymer is added to soap
`noodle and mixed in the soap mixing steps of the soap
`bar making process.
`The soap bars of this invention preferably contain up
`to 20% of a synthetic surfactant. If a synthetic surfac(cid:173)
`tant is included, a mild one is preferred. A mild syn(cid:173)
`thetic surfactant is defined herein as one which does
`relatively little damage to the barrier function of the
`stratum corneum. The mild surfactant is preferably used
`at a level of0-20%, preferably about 2-15%. The fatty
`acid soap and mild surfactant mixture preferably has a
`ratio of 2.5:1 to 37:1, preferably from 2.5:1 to 14:1, and
`most preferably from 6.5:1 to 14:1, soap:synthetic.
`A preferred soap bar of this invention also contains
`from about 2% to about 17% moisturizer, preferably
`one selected from glycerin and free fatty acid or mix(cid:173)
`tures thereof. The more preferred bar of this invention
`contains at least 4% moisturizer.
`Some preferred mild synthetic surfactants useful in
`this invention include alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate
`(AGS), anionic acyl sarcosinates, methyl acyl taurates,
`N-acyl glutamates, alkyl glucosides, acyl isethionates,
`alkyl sulfosuccinate, alkyl phosphate esters, ethoxylated
`alkyl phosphate esters, alkyl ether sulfates, methyl glu(cid:173)
`cose esters, protein condensates, mixtures of alkyl ether
`sulfates and alkyl amine oxides, betaines, sultaines, and
`mixtures thereof. Included in the surfactants are the
`
`4
`
`

`

`7
`alkyl ether sulfates with 1 to 12 ethoxy groups, espe(cid:173)
`cially ammonium and sodium Iaury] ether sulfates.
`Alkyl chain lengths for these surfactants are Cs-C22.
`preferably Cw-CJs. The most preferred mild surfactant
`is sodium CN AGS.
`The following examples are presented by way of
`illustration only.
`
`5,202,048
`
`8
`then plodded into soap noodles and conveyed via a
`transport plodder to a fmal milling step.
`The mixture is milled using a four-roll mill, plodded,
`and then stamped into toilet bars of any convenient size
`5 and shape. The resulting bars are tested for odor. The
`bars have a pH of 9.5 in a 1% aqueous solution.
`
`EXAMPLES 1 AND 2
`Toilet bars made using the ingredients set out in 10
`Table 2.
`
`TABLE2
`
`Odor Test Procedure
`Polymer Cleaning
`Stock samples of polymer are cleaned by swelling the
`polymer with water followed by extensive aeration.
`These "cleaned" polymers are fairly amine odor-free.
`After long storage times, some of these polymers exbib(cid:173)
`
`fied polymers required little, if any, cleansing prior to
`testing! evaluating.
`
`----=------.,.,,..----------__;;-- 15 ited a slight, but recognizable amine odor. Bulky modi(cid:173)
`
`Ingredient
`Sodium Tallowate<I)
`Sodium Cocoate(l)
`Water
`Sodium Cocoglyceryl Ether
`Sulfonate (AGS)
`Glycerin
`Coconut Fatty Acid
`Triclocarban
`Sodium Chloride
`Fragrance
`Polyquatemium-7<2)
`LM-200(3)
`Guar-HPTd4)
`Titanium Dioxide
`Tetrasodium EDT A
`BTH(S)
`Miscellaneous(6)
`
`Ex. I
`Parts
`32.90
`32.90
`9.SO
`8.80
`
`Ex. 2
`Parts
`32.90
`32.90
`9.SO
`8.80
`
`4.00
`3.80
`!.SO
`1.20
`1.20
`1.00
`1.00
`
`0.3S
`0.06
`0,02
`
`4.00
`3.80
`!.SO
`1.20
`1.20
`1.00
`
`1.00
`0.3S
`0.06
`0.02
`
`20
`
`Effects Testing Procedures
`The general procedure followed in evaluating the
`effects of pH on polymer or final product odor was to
`place about 200 mg of the clean polymer (or a finished
`product) in a screw-top vial (8 dram) and then add the
`test solution (bufferi at pH values of 7; -to, or 14). The
`25 vials are capped and the odor allowed to build up for a
`short amount of time. Odor is evaluated via olfactory
`sensing by a panel of experts.
`The pH buffers are commercially available buffers:
`pH 7-KH2P04-NaOH
`pH 10-H3B03-KOH
`pH 14-lN NaOH.
`
`100.00
`Totals 100.00
`(IJn.. vollieS stated for sodium tallowate and sodium cocooote iDclude a low level 30
`(>0.1%) ofUDaaponifiable material.
`(l>n,. tnde aame for Polyquaternium-7 is Meraquat ~-
`<3)LM-200 is a cationic ceUulolic polymer comprisin& a bullty cocoyl amine.
`<4louar HPTC is auar bydroxypropyltriammollium chloride is JIIJU&r C-1 S (Hi(cid:173)
`Tek). Molecular weiJbt is about 200,000 ± 75,000.
`<5lsHT is iDcluded in the rapective perfume formulas to impart preservative/anti-
`oxidant properties both to the perfume and to the fmisbed bar formula.
`<6)-MisceUaneous" includes a low level of sodium sulfate and unsulfoaated alcohol
`which come in, e.g., as a by-product of the AGS stream.
`
`35
`
`TABLE 3
`Qdor Evaluation of Polymers and Products Under
`Induced Alkaline Conditions (pH-10-14)
`Polymer/Product
`Odor Evaluation
`Strong amine odor
`IR.-400
`Strong amine odor
`Jaguar C-IS
`LM-200
`No amine odor
`Product of Ex. 1
`No amine odor
`_____ Pr_od __ u_ct_o_f_Ex __ .2 ______ str_o_n~g_urum __ ·_e_od_o_r ______ __
`Note:
`Ex. I product produced with LM-200
`Ex. 2 product produced with }IIJU&r
`
`In general, making procedures common to those used
`for conventional toilet soap bar making are employed.
`
`40
`
`Mixing/Milling Steps
`Polymer Addition Step
`Plodded soap noodles are conveyed to a continuous
`mixer (CM) where approximately 1.0 part of cationic 45
`polymer is introduced, mixed, and plodded with the
`soap noodles. Uniform distribution during this addition
`and mixing step is important for acceptable bar feel
`performance. The polymer/soap noodles (generic noo-
`dies) are conveyed to milling.
`
`Generic Milling Step
`Two four-roll soap mills (feed, stationary, middle,
`and top rolls) are used in this step. This is a split milling
`(two set of mills are used in parallel) process to obtain a 55
`homogeneous mix. Efficient milling is needed in this
`intimate mixing step.
`
`Dry Mixing Step
`The generic noodles are conveyed to a second pro- 60
`cess system continuous mixer (CM) for the addition and
`mixing of other minors. This mix is plodded and con(cid:173)
`veyed to the third process CM.
`
`Wet Mixing Step
`The perfume and NaCI/sodium ethylene diamine
`tetra acetate (EDT A) solution are added and mixed in
`this wet mixing (CM) step. This fmished soap formula is
`
`65
`
`JR-400 made by Union Carbide Corporation and
`JAGUAR C-15 made by Hi-Tek Polymers, Inc., are
`outside the selected polymers of this invention.
`What is claimed is: .
`. .
`. .
`1. A personal cleansmg compos1t1on compnsmg from
`so about 5% to about 90% by weight of surfactant selected
`from the group consisting of synthetic surfactant, alkali
`metal soap, and mixtures thereof; and from about 0.2%
`to about 5% by weight bulky amine cationic polymer,
`said bulky amine cationic polymer being essentially free
`of potential labile odoriferous amine groups; wherein
`said bulky amine cationic polymer is: Guar (POLY(cid:173)
`MER)-CR'HCR2R3-CH2NR4R~R6 wherein R'-R3 is a
`-H or -OH substituent, and wherein at least one of
`R4, R~ and R6 are selected from the group consisting of
`alkyl having a chain length of from about 2 to about 24
`carbon atoms, and alkoxy alkyl containing from about 2
`to about 12 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof; and
`wherein said personal cleansing composition bas an
`alkaline pH of at least about 7.5 in a 1% aqueous solu(cid:173)
`tion.
`l. The personal cleansing composition of claim 1
`wherein aid composition is in a form selected from
`liquids, pastes or bars.
`
`5
`
`

`

`10
`is present in said mixture at a level to provide from
`about 0.2% to about 5% by weight of said polymer
`in said composition; said mixture containing from
`about 6% to about 15% moisture;
`(b) milling said mixture into a uniform mixture;
`(c) plodding said uniform mixture;
`(d) extruding said milled and plodded mixture; and
`(e) stamping said extruded mixture into toilet bars.
`7. The personal cleansing composition of claim 1
`10 wherein said composition contains from about 2% to
`about 20% of synthetic surfactant selected from alkyl
`glyceryl ether sulfonates, anionic acyl sarcosinates,
`methyl acyl taurates, N-acyl glutamates, alkyl gluco-
`mixtures thereof; and
`15 sides, acyl isethionates, alkyl sulfosuccinates, alkyl
`phosphate esters, ethoxylated alkyl phosphate esters,
`wherein said polymer has a molecular weight of from
`about 50,000 to about 1,000,000.
`methyl glucose esters, protein condensates, mixtures of
`ethoxylated alkyl sulfates and alkyl amine oxides, beta-
`4. The personal cleansing composition of claim 1
`wherein said cationic polymer is present at from about
`ines, sultaines, the alkyl ether sulfates with 1 to 12 eth-
`20 oxy groups, and mixtures thereof, wherein said syn-
`0.5% to about 4% by weight.
`thetic surfactant contains alkyl chains containing from
`5. The personal cleansing composition of claim 1
`wherein said pH is at least about 8.5.
`about 8 to about 22 carbon atoms.
`8. The composition of claim 7 wherein said composi-
`6. A process for preparing the personal cleansing
`composition of claim 1 comprising the steps of:
`tion contains from about 5% to about 10% of a Cs-Cts
`(a) forming a mixture of said cationic polymer and 25 alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate. .
`alkali metal soap mix noodles wherein said polymer
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`CH2CH20H
`I
`Guar-CH2-0-CH2-CH(OH)-CH2-N+CH3
`I
`CH3
`
`·and
`,
`
`•
`
`9
`3. The personal cleansing composition of claim 1
`wherein said cationic polymer is selected from the
`group consisting of:
`
`5,202,048
`
`s
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`ss
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket