`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`VirnetX Inc.,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-563
`
`
`§§§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF VIRNETX INC.’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) files this Complaint against Defendant Apple Inc. for
`
`patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and in support thereof would respectfully show the
`
`Court the following:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, and maintains its principal place of business at 308 Dorla Court, Suite 206,
`
`Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”) is a California corporation with
`
`its principal place of business at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014. On information
`
`and belief, Apple regularly conducts and transacts business in Texas, throughout the United
`
`States, and within the Eastern District of Texas, and as set forth below, has committed and
`
`continues to commit, tortious acts of patent infringement within and outside of Texas and within
`
`the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2001
`Apple v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2014-00486
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction
`
`over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
`
`4.
`
`Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b).
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant has conducted
`
`and does conduct business within the State of Texas. Defendant, directly or through subsidiaries
`
`or intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others), ships, distributes, offers for sale,
`
`sells, and advertises (including the provision of an interactive web page) its products and/or
`
`services in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas. Defendant,
`
`directly and through subsidiaries or intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others),
`
`has purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of its infringing products and/or services, as
`
`described below, into the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will be purchased
`
`and used by consumers in the Eastern District of Texas. These infringing products and/or
`
`services have been and continue to be purchased and used by consumers in the Eastern District
`
`of Texas. Defendant has committed acts of patent infringement within the State of Texas and,
`
`more particularly, within the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`ASSERTED PATENT
`
`6.
`
`On November 1, 2011, United States Patent No. 8,051,181 (“the ‘181 patent”)
`
`entitled “Method for Establishing Secure Communication Link Between Computers of Virtual
`
`Private Network,” was duly and legally issued with Victor Larson, Robert Durham Short, III,
`
`Edmund Colby Munger, and Michael Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`examination. VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’181 patent and
`
`possesses all rights of recovery under the ’181 patent.
`
`COUNT ONE
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY APPLE
`
`7.
`
`VirnetX incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-6 as if fully set forth herein. As
`
`described below, Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe the ’181 patent.
`
`8.
`
`At least Apple’s iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPod Touch, iPad 2, and Macintosh
`
`computers with the “Lion” operating system directly or indirectly infringe at least claims 1, 2, 4-
`
`12, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24-29 of the ’181 patent. Apple makes, uses, sells, offers to sell, and imports
`
`these products and thus directly infringes the ‘181 patent.
`
`9.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes the ’181 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`others, such as resellers and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Apple offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially
`
`made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple article or
`
`commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`10.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by others, such as resellers
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Apple actively induces
`
`infringement of the ’181 patent by others, such as resellers and end-user customers.
`
`11.
`
`Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe one or more claims of the ’181
`
`patent as set forth above. Apple is liable for direct infringement, as well as indirect infringement
`
`by way of inducement and/or contributory infringement, for the ’181 patent pursuant to 35
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`U.S.C. § 271 (a), (b), (c), and/or (f) as set forth above. For VirnetX’s claims of indirect
`
`infringement, Apple’s resellers, consultants, and/or end-user customers are direct infringers of
`
`the ’181 patent.
`
`12.
`
`Apple’s acts of infringement have caused damage to VirnetX. VirnetX is entitled
`
`to recover from Apple the damages sustained by VirnetX as a result of Apple’s wrongful acts in
`
`an amount subject to proof at trial. In addition, the infringing acts and practices of Apple have
`
`caused, are causing, and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continue
`
`to cause immediate and irreparable harm to VirnetX for which there is no adequate remedy at
`
`law, and for which VirnetX is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. § 283.
`
`13.
`
`Apple has received actual notice of infringement by virtue of the filing of this
`
`lawsuit.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`VirnetX hereby demands a jury for all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, VirnetX prays for the following relief:
`
`1.
`
`A judgment that Apple has directly infringed the ’181 patent, contributorily
`
`infringed the ’181 patent, and/or induced the infringement of the ’181 patent;
`
`2.
`
`A preliminary and permanent injunction preventing Apple and its respective
`
`officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, licensees, successors, and assigns, and
`
`those in active concert or participation with any of them, from directly infringing, contributorily
`
`infringing, and/or inducing the infringement of the ’181 patent;
`
`3.
`
`This case be found an exceptional case, entitling VirnetX to attorneys’ fees
`
`incurred in prosecuting this action;
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`4.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX damages under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284, including supplemental damages for any continuing post-verdict infringement up
`
`until entry of the final judgment, with an accounting, as needed, and treble damages for willful
`
`infringement as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`5.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX the costs of this action
`
`(including all disbursements);
`
`6.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX pre-judgment and post-
`
`judgment interest on the damages awarded;
`
`7.
`
`A judgment and order requiring that in the event a permanent injunction
`
`preventing future acts of infringement is not granted, that VirnetX be awarded a compulsory
`
`ongoing licensing fee; and
`
`8.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`DATED: November 1, 2011
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
`/s/ Douglas A. Cawley
`Douglas A. Cawley, Lead Attorney
`Texas State Bar No. 04035500
`E-mail: dcawley@mckoolsmith.com
`Luke F. McLeroy
`Texas State Bar No. 24041455
`E-mail: lmcleroy@mckoolsmith.com
`Bradley W. Caldwell
`Texas State Bar No. 24040630
`E-mail: bcaldwell@mckoolsmith.com
`Jason D. Cassady
`Texas State Bar No. 24045625
`E-mail: jcassady@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
`300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 978-4000
`Telecopier: (214) 978-4044
`
`Sam F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`E-mail: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
`104 East Houston, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Telecopier: (903) 923-9099
`
`Robert M. Parker
`Texas State Bar No. 15498000
`rmparker@pbatyler.com
`Robert Christopher Bunt
`Texas State Bar No. 00787165
`rcbunt@pbatyler.com
`PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.
`100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 531-3535
`Telecopier: (903) 533-9687
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VIRNETX INC.
`
`
`
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`