throbber
Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`VirnetX Inc.,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-563
`
`
`§§§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF VIRNETX INC.’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) files this Complaint against Defendant Apple Inc. for
`
`patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and in support thereof would respectfully show the
`
`Court the following:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, and maintains its principal place of business at 308 Dorla Court, Suite 206,
`
`Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”) is a California corporation with
`
`its principal place of business at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014. On information
`
`and belief, Apple regularly conducts and transacts business in Texas, throughout the United
`
`States, and within the Eastern District of Texas, and as set forth below, has committed and
`
`continues to commit, tortious acts of patent infringement within and outside of Texas and within
`
`the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2001
`Apple v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2014-00486
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction
`
`over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
`
`4.
`
`Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b).
`
`5.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. Defendant has conducted
`
`and does conduct business within the State of Texas. Defendant, directly or through subsidiaries
`
`or intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others), ships, distributes, offers for sale,
`
`sells, and advertises (including the provision of an interactive web page) its products and/or
`
`services in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas. Defendant,
`
`directly and through subsidiaries or intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others),
`
`has purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of its infringing products and/or services, as
`
`described below, into the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will be purchased
`
`and used by consumers in the Eastern District of Texas. These infringing products and/or
`
`services have been and continue to be purchased and used by consumers in the Eastern District
`
`of Texas. Defendant has committed acts of patent infringement within the State of Texas and,
`
`more particularly, within the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`ASSERTED PATENT
`
`6.
`
`On November 1, 2011, United States Patent No. 8,051,181 (“the ‘181 patent”)
`
`entitled “Method for Establishing Secure Communication Link Between Computers of Virtual
`
`Private Network,” was duly and legally issued with Victor Larson, Robert Durham Short, III,
`
`Edmund Colby Munger, and Michael Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`examination. VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’181 patent and
`
`possesses all rights of recovery under the ’181 patent.
`
`COUNT ONE
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY APPLE
`
`7.
`
`VirnetX incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-6 as if fully set forth herein. As
`
`described below, Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe the ’181 patent.
`
`8.
`
`At least Apple’s iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPod Touch, iPad 2, and Macintosh
`
`computers with the “Lion” operating system directly or indirectly infringe at least claims 1, 2, 4-
`
`12, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24-29 of the ’181 patent. Apple makes, uses, sells, offers to sell, and imports
`
`these products and thus directly infringes the ‘181 patent.
`
`9.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes the ’181 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`others, such as resellers and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Apple offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially
`
`made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple article or
`
`commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`10.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by others, such as resellers
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Apple actively induces
`
`infringement of the ’181 patent by others, such as resellers and end-user customers.
`
`11.
`
`Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe one or more claims of the ’181
`
`patent as set forth above. Apple is liable for direct infringement, as well as indirect infringement
`
`by way of inducement and/or contributory infringement, for the ’181 patent pursuant to 35
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`U.S.C. § 271 (a), (b), (c), and/or (f) as set forth above. For VirnetX’s claims of indirect
`
`infringement, Apple’s resellers, consultants, and/or end-user customers are direct infringers of
`
`the ’181 patent.
`
`12.
`
`Apple’s acts of infringement have caused damage to VirnetX. VirnetX is entitled
`
`to recover from Apple the damages sustained by VirnetX as a result of Apple’s wrongful acts in
`
`an amount subject to proof at trial. In addition, the infringing acts and practices of Apple have
`
`caused, are causing, and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will continue
`
`to cause immediate and irreparable harm to VirnetX for which there is no adequate remedy at
`
`law, and for which VirnetX is entitled to injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. § 283.
`
`13.
`
`Apple has received actual notice of infringement by virtue of the filing of this
`
`lawsuit.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`VirnetX hereby demands a jury for all issues so triable.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, VirnetX prays for the following relief:
`
`1.
`
`A judgment that Apple has directly infringed the ’181 patent, contributorily
`
`infringed the ’181 patent, and/or induced the infringement of the ’181 patent;
`
`2.
`
`A preliminary and permanent injunction preventing Apple and its respective
`
`officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, licensees, successors, and assigns, and
`
`those in active concert or participation with any of them, from directly infringing, contributorily
`
`infringing, and/or inducing the infringement of the ’181 patent;
`
`3.
`
`This case be found an exceptional case, entitling VirnetX to attorneys’ fees
`
`incurred in prosecuting this action;
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`4.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX damages under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284, including supplemental damages for any continuing post-verdict infringement up
`
`until entry of the final judgment, with an accounting, as needed, and treble damages for willful
`
`infringement as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`5.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX the costs of this action
`
`(including all disbursements);
`
`6.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Defendant to pay VirnetX pre-judgment and post-
`
`judgment interest on the damages awarded;
`
`7.
`
`A judgment and order requiring that in the event a permanent injunction
`
`preventing future acts of infringement is not granted, that VirnetX be awarded a compulsory
`
`ongoing licensing fee; and
`
`8.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:11-cv-00563-LED Document 1 Filed 11/01/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`DATED: November 1, 2011
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`
`/s/ Douglas A. Cawley
`Douglas A. Cawley, Lead Attorney
`Texas State Bar No. 04035500
`E-mail: dcawley@mckoolsmith.com
`Luke F. McLeroy
`Texas State Bar No. 24041455
`E-mail: lmcleroy@mckoolsmith.com
`Bradley W. Caldwell
`Texas State Bar No. 24040630
`E-mail: bcaldwell@mckoolsmith.com
`Jason D. Cassady
`Texas State Bar No. 24045625
`E-mail: jcassady@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
`300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 978-4000
`Telecopier: (214) 978-4044
`
`Sam F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`E-mail: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
`104 East Houston, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Telecopier: (903) 923-9099
`
`Robert M. Parker
`Texas State Bar No. 15498000
`rmparker@pbatyler.com
`Robert Christopher Bunt
`Texas State Bar No. 00787165
`rcbunt@pbatyler.com
`PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.
`100 East Ferguson, Suite 1114
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 531-3535
`Telecopier: (903) 533-9687
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VIRNETX INC.
`
`
`
`
`McKool 401462v2
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket