throbber
Presentation of Petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00481
`IPR2014 00481
`IPR2014-00482
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180, ,
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`1
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent
`
`1.
`
`IPR2014-00481 (Provino)
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`
`“receiving a secure domain name” (claims 1, 17, 33)
`“the virtual private network includes the Internet” (claims 10, 26)
`“. . . a request for information stored at the secure computer network address”
`(claims 12, 28)
`D. Provino in view of Guillen: “provisioning information” (claims 4, 6, 20, 22, 35,
`37)
`
`IPR2014-00482 (Kiuchi)IPR2014 00482 (Kiuchi)
`
`
`
`22.
`
`“receiving a secure domain name” (claims 1, 17, 33)
`A.
`B. Kiuchi in view of Tavs: “a predetermined level of service” (claims 6, 22, 37)
`
`Related IPR Proceedings:
`U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697 (IPR2014-00237, -00238),
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274 (IPR2014-00403, -00404, -00483, -00484).
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`2
`
`

`
`’274 Patent Claim 1 and ’180 Patent Claim 1
`
`’274 Patent (Ex. 1027) at Claim 1
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`3
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`4
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 17
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 17
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`5
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 33
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 33
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`6
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00481
`
`Grounds in -00481
`Grounds in 00481
`1. Whether Claims 1, 10, 12-15, 17, 26, 28-31, and 33
`
`ttf th ’180of the ’180 patent are anticipated by Provino (Ex. ti i t d b P i (E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1003)
`
`i2 Wh th Cl2. Whether Claims 4, 6, 20, 22, 35, and 37 of the ’180 4 6 20 22 35 d 37 f th ’180
`
`
`
`
`patent is obvious over Provino in view of Guillen (Ex.
`1005)
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`7
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`
`Ex. 1003 at abstract; Pet. at 25
`
`
`
`Ex 1003 at Fig 1; see Pet 16; Ex 1011 at ¶ 26Ex. 1003 at Fig. 1; see Pet. 16; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 26
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`8
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`device 12(m) and VPN 15 “cooperate to establish a secure tunnel”
`
`Pet. 16 (Annot. 1), Ex. 1011 at ¶ 28 (Annot. 1)
`
`Ex. 1003 at 12:1-8; Pet. at 15; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 27
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`9
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`device 12(m) sends “request message packet” to nameserver 32
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:11-16; Pet. at 21, 27; see Ex. 1011 at ¶ 30
`
`Pet. 22 (Annot. 5); Ex. 1011 at ¶ 31 (Annot. 4)
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`10
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`nameserver 32 provides “integer Internet address” to device 12(m)
`
`Pet. 23 (Annot. 6), Ex. 1011 at ¶ 32 (Annot. 5)
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:16-25; Pet. at 27-28; see Ex. 1011 at ¶ 32
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`11
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`device 12(m) uses “integer Internet address” to message server 31(s)
`
`Pet. 24 (Annot. 7), Ex. 1011 at ¶ 38 (Annot. 7)
`
`Ex. 1003 at 15:20-30; Pet. at 24, 28-29; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`12
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“receiving a secure domain name”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`13
`
`

`
`Institution Decision
`Constructions of “secure domain name”, “secure domain name service”
`“secure computer network address”
`
`Decision (481) at 7
`
`Decision (481) at 8
`
`Decision (481) at 9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`14
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“receiving a secure domain name”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:5-25; Pet. 25-26
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`15
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Provino’s “secure domain name”
`
`Resp. at 27
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`16
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`Provino’s “secure domain name”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:16-25; Pet. at 25-26
`
`Ex. 1003 at 16:12-17; Pet. at 19
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`17
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“sending a query message to a secure domain name service”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`18
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“sending a query message to a secure domain name service”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:5-25; Pet. 26-27
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`19
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent
`DNS v. “secure domain name service”
`
`Ex. 1001 at 39:45-52; Reply (481) at 8
`
`Ex. 1001 at 52:4-8; Reply (481) at 8-9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`20
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Provino’s “server 31(s)”
`
`Ex. 1088 at 39:17-40:7; Reply at 9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`21
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“secure domain name service”
`
`
`
`Ex. 1003 at 10:45-55; Reply at 10; p y
`
`
`
`Ex. 1001 at 51:29-35; Reply at 10
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`22
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Construction of “secure domain name service”
`
`Resp. (481) at 31
`
`Resp. (481) at 33-34
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`23
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“receiving . . . a response message”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`24
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“receiving . . . a response message”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 11:5-23; Pet. at 27-28
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`25
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“sending an access request message”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`26
`
`

`
`Institution Decision
`Construction of “access request message”
`
`Decision (481) at 6
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`27
`
`

`
`Institution Decision
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Decision (481) at 7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`28
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“sending an access request message . . .”
`
`
`
`Ex. 1003 at 15:21-30; Pet. at 28-29Ex. 1003 at 15:21 30; Pet. at 28 29
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`29
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Provino’s “access request message”
`
`Resp. at 39
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`30
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“access request message”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 6:35-47; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 39; Pet. at 30; Decision at 15
`
`Ex. 1011 at ¶ 39; Pet. at 30; Reply at 12
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`31
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Provino’s “access request message”
`
`Ex. 1088 at 42:12-43:10; Reply at 12
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`32
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Provino’s “access request message”
`
`Ex. 1089 at 44:17-45:1; Reply at 12
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`33
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“virtual private network communication link”
`
`Pet. 16 (Annot. 1), Ex. 1011 at ¶ 28 (Annot. 1)
`
`Ex. 1003 at 6:15-19; Pet. at 20; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 26
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`34
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`“virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 1011 at ¶ 28; Pet. at 18
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`35
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Resp. (481) at 4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`36
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 1001 at 48:1-10; Resp. at 6
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`37
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 1001 at 52:27-40; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 12; Pet. (481) at 13; see Reply (481) at 4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`38
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 1088 at 13:5-19; Reply at 4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`39
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Construction of “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 2024 (481) at ¶ 17; Reply (481) at 3-4
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`40
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 10 & 26
`VPN over “the Internet”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 10
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 26
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`41
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Provino’s VPN over “the Internet”
`
`Resp. (481) at 43
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`42
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Provino
`VPN over “the Internet”
`
`Ex. 1003 at 16:12-17; Pet. at 19; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 34
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`43
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 12 & 28
`“request for information”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 12
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 28
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`44
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00481
`
`Grounds in -00481
`Grounds in 00481
`1. Whether Claims 1, 10, 12-15, 17, 26, 28-31, and 33
`
`tf th ’180of the ’180 patent are anticipated by Provino (Ex. t ti i t d b P i (E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1003)
`
`2 Wh th Cl i2. Whether Claims 4, 6, 20, 22, 35, and 37 of the ’180 4 6 20 22 35 d 37 f th ’180
`
`
`
`patent is obvious over Provino in view of Guillen
`(Ex. 1005)
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`45
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 4 & 6
`“provisioning information”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 4
`
`
`
`’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 28t (E 1001) t Cl i 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`46
`
`

`
`Institution Decision
`Construction of “provisioning information”
`
`Decision (481) at 11
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`47
`
`

`
`Guillen
`“provisioning information”
`
`Ex. 1005 at § 2.1, p. 81; Ex. 1011 at ¶ 40-43; Reply at 14-15; Pet. at 36
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`48
`
`

`
`Provino in view of Guillen
`
`Ex. 1011 at ¶ 42; Reply at 14; see Pet. at 35-38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`49
`
`

`
`Provino in view of Guillen
`
`Ex. 1011 at ¶ 43; Pet. at 35-38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`50
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Provino in view of Guillen
`
`Ex. 1089 at 60:18-61:13; Reply at 14-15
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`51
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Provino in view of Guillen
`
`Ex. 1089 at 59:22-60:2; Reply at 15
`
`Ex. 2024 at ¶ 53; Reply at 15
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`52
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00482
`
`Grounds in -00482
`Grounds in -00482
`1. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33,
`and 35 of the ’180 patent are anticipated by Kiuchi (Ex. p p y (
`
`
`
`
`1004)
`
`2. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33, and
`
`35 f th ’18035 of the ’180 patent are obvious over Kiuchi in view of t t b i Ki hi i i f
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bhatti (Ex. 1010)
`
`3. Whether Claims 6, 22, and 37 of the ’180 patent are3. Whether Claims 6, 22, and 37 of the 180 patent are
`
`obvious over Kiuchi in view of Tavs (Ex. 1009), or over
`Kiuchi in view of Bhatti and Tavs
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`53
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 64, § 2.1; Pet. at 23
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`54
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“receiving a secure domain name”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`55
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“receiving a secure domain name”
`
`
`
`Ex 1004 p 65 § 2 3(1); Pet at 23 24Ex. 1004, p. 65, § 2.3(1); Pet. at 23-24
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`56
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“sending a query message”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`57
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“sending a query message to a secure domain name service”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 65, § 2.3(2); Pet. at 24
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`58
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Kiuchi’s “secure computer network address”
`
`Resp. at 33
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`59
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“secure computer network address”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 68 § 4.2(2); Reply at 6
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 65, § 2.3(2); Reply at 6
`
`Ex. 1004, 73, App. 3; Reply at 6
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 71, App. § 1.3; Reply at 6
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`60
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Kiuchi’s “secure computer network address”
`
`Ex. 1088 at 66:9-22; Reply at 6
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`61
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“secure computer network address”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 66, § 2.3(7); Reply at 7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`62
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Kiuchi’s “second network device”
`
`Ex. 1088 at 52:15-17; Reply at 7
`
`Ex. 1088 at 56:1-21; Reply at 7
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`63
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“receiving . . . a response message”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`64
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“receiving . . . a response message”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 65, § 2.3(2); Pet. at 24-25
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`65
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 1
`“sending an access request message”
`
`
`
`1t Cl it (E 1001)’180 P t’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`66
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“sending an access request message”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 66, § 2.3(6); Pet. at 24-25
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`67
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“sending an access request message”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 66, § 2.3(6); Pet. at 25
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 71; Pet. at 25
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`68
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“sending an access request message . . .”
`
`Resp. at 38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`69
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“sending an access request message”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 66, Fig. (c); Reply at 8
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 66, § 2.3(6); Reply at 8
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`70
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Kiuchi’s “access request message”
`
`Resp. at 39
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`71
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`Kiuchi’s “access request message”
`
`Ex. 2024 at ¶ 44; Reply at 9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`72
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Kiuchi’s “virtual private network communication link”
`
`Resp. at 40
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`73
`
`

`
`Anticipation by Kiuchi
`“virtual private network communication link”
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 64, § 2.1; Pet. at 23; Reply at 10
`
`Ex. 1004, p. 64; Reply at 10
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`74
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 13, 15
`“client computer”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 13
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 15
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`75
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 29, 31
`“client computer”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 29
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 31
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`76
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Construction of “client computer”
`
`Resp. at 22
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`77
`
`

`
`RFC 1945
`Construction of “client computer”
`
`RFC 1945 (Ex. 1021) at 5; Reply at 9
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`78
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claims 12 & 28
`“request for information”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 12
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 28
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`79
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00482
`
`Grounds in -00482
`Grounds in 00482
`
`1. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33, and
`
`35 of the ’180 patent are anticipated by Kiuchi (Ex 1004)35 of the 180 patent are anticipated by Kiuchi (Ex. 1004)
`
`2. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33,
`
`and 35 of the ’180 patent are obvious over Kiuchi inand 35 of the 180 patent are obvious over Kiuchi in
`view of Bhatti (Ex. 1010)
`
`3. Whether Claims 6, 22, and 37 of the ’180 patent are , , p
`
`
`
`obvious over Kiuchi in view of Tavs (Ex. 1009), or over
`Kiuchi in view of Bhatti and Tavs
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`80
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Kiuchi in view of Bhatti
`
`Resp. at 55
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`81
`
`

`
`Kiuchi in view of Bhatti
`
`Pet. at 38
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`82
`
`

`
`IPR2014-00482
`
`Grounds in -00482
`Grounds in 00482
`
`1. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33, and
`
`35 of the ’180 patent are anticipated by Kiuchi (Ex 1004)35 of the 180 patent are anticipated by Kiuchi (Ex. 1004)
`
`2. Whether Claims 1, 4, 10, 12-15, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 33, and
`
`35 of the ’180 patent are obvious over Kiuchi in view of35 of the 180 patent are obvious over Kiuchi in view of
`Bhatti (Ex. 1010)
`
`3. Whether Claims 6, 22, and 37 of the ’180 patent are , , p
`
`
`
`obvious over Kiuchi in view of Tavs (Ex. 1009), or over
`Kiuchi in view of Bhatti and Tavs
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`83
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent, Claim 6
`“predetermined level of service”
`
`’180 Patent (Ex. 1001) at Claim 28
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`84
`
`

`
`The ’180 Patent
`“predetermined level of service”
`
`Ex. 1001 at 55:57-65; Reply at 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`85
`
`

`
`Kiuchi in view of Tavs
`
`Ex. 1008 at 5:23-28; Reply at 13
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`86
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`“predetermined level of service”
`
`Ex. 1089 at 78:20-79:12; Reply at 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`87
`
`

`
`Kiuchi in view of Tavs
`RFC 791: “Type of Service” byte
`
`Ex. 1020 at 16; Reply at 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`88
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`“predetermined level of service”
`
`Ex. 1089 at 35:18-38:13; Reply at 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`89
`
`

`
`Kiuchi in view of Tavs
`
`Ex. 1004 at p. 67, § 3(2); Reply at 13
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. – Ex. 1090
`
`90

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket