throbber
A. Ground 1: Claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 14 are anticipated by
`Warr Thesis
`
`‘710 Claim Language
`Followed by corresponding features in the reference.1
`[1 pre.] A method of operating an optical device comprising an SLM having
`a two dimensional array of controllable phase modulating elements, the
`method comprising:
`To operate an optical device comprising a two dimensional SLM, Warr Thesis
`teaches “the use of programmable computer-generated holograms (CGHs)
`displayed on a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM).
`The SLM provides fast 2-dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and
`acts as a dynamically reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii.
`Warr Thesis also discloses an SLM with an array of phase modulating elements.
`“SLMs typically consist of an array of individually controllable
`pixels…Ferroelectric liquid crystal SLMs…can also be readily configured as
`phase- or as intensity-modulators.” Warr Thesis at 7. “To obtain maximum light
`efficiency, the SLM pixels should only modulate the phase of the incident
`Gaussian beam and not the intensity.” Warr Thesis at 13. “Because each pixel
`now acts as a perfect (0, π) binary phase modulator, the input polariser may also
`be removed.” Warr Thesis at 25.
`The phase modulating elements in Warr Thesis are also controllable.
`“Essentially backplane SLMs operate as optically-readable memory. Although
`the integration of photodiodes onto the silicon circuitry also introduces the
`possibility of optically addressed ‘smart pixels’ [50], usually we are only
`concerned with electronic addressing schemes (EASLMs). Two binary storage
`schemes are well known in conventional silicon memory technology, and these
`have been incorporated into EASLM designs. The dynamic RAM pixel
`circuitry [15], figure 2.7(a), has a single transistor per pixel and the 1-bit binary
`memory state is stored as a capacitive charge polarity on the actual mirror
`contact.” Warr Thesis at 19-20.
`See also Warr Thesis at 17, 18, 107. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 56.
`[1a.] delineating groups of individual phase-modulating elements;
`The delineation of groups of individual phase-modulating elements is found in
`Warr Thesis. “The collimation array in plane P2 is arranged exactly one focal
`distance in front of the fibre ends so that the Gaussian signal beams are
`individually collimated through the FLC-SLM. The SLM display area is then
`
`1 Bold and italicized text are for emphasis in the claim charts in this petition, unless stated
`otherwise.
`
`
`
`1
`
`FINISAR 1020
`
`

`

`divided into distinct sub-holograms, such that every input source is deflected by
`a different CGH.” Warr Thesis at 89.
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 89. “Each of the four beams was deflected by a separate 80x80
`pixel region of the 2DX320IR SLM. This transmissive FLC device has 80μm
`pixels, a 28° FLC switching angle, and exhibits a peak response around  = l.lμm
`wavelength.” Warr Thesis at 103.
`
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 103. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 57.
`[1b.] selecting, from stored control data, control data for each group of
`phase-modulating elements;
`The devices disclosed in Warr Thesis have stored control data. “Essentially
`backplane SLMs operate as optically-readable memory…Two binary storage
`schemes are well known in conventional silicon memory technology, and these
`have been incorporated into EASLM designs. The dynamic RAM pixel circuitry
`[15], figure 2.7(a), has a single transistor per pixel and the 1-bit binary memory
`state is stored as a capacitive charge polarity on the actual mirror contact.” Warr
`Thesis at 19-20. “The FLC device displays one frame from a set of phase CGHs
`which have been calculated off-line at an earlier stage and placed in a frame
`store to be recalled on demand.” Warr Thesis at 33.
`Selecting control data for each group of phase modulating elements is also
`present in Warr Thesis. “This is achieved by the use of programmable
`computer-generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid
`crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-
`dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically
`reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii.
`Also see claim [1a.] for the discussion of each group of phase-modulating
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`elements. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 58.
`[1c.] generating from the respective selected control data a respective
`hologram at each group of phase-modulating elements; and
`To generate a hologram from the selected control data, Warr Thesis “displays
`one frame from a set of phase CGHs which have been calculated off-line at an
`earlier stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on demand.” Warr Thesis
`at 33. “This is achieved by the use of programmable computer-generated
`holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) spatial
`light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-dimensional binary
`modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically reconfigurable
`diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii.
`Warr Thesis also teaches the generation of a respective hologram at each group
`of phase-modulating elements. “The collimation array in plane P2 is arranged
`exactly one focal distance in front of the fibre ends so that the Gaussian signal
`beams are individually collimated through the FLC-SLM. The SLM display area
`is then divided into distinct sub-holograms, such that every input source is
`deflected by a different CGH.” Warr Thesis at 89.
`
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 89.
`“Each of the four beams was deflected by a separate 80x80 pixel region of the
`2DX320IR SLM. This transmissive FLC device has 80μm pixels, a 28° FLC
`switching angle, and exhibits a peak response around  = l.lμm wavelength.”
`Warr Thesis at 103.
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 103. See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 59-60.
`[1d.] varying the delineation of the groups and/or the selection of control
`data
`To vary the selection of control data, Warr Thesis discloses, “This is achieved by
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`the use of programmable computer-generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a
`ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM
`provides fast 2-dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and acts as a
`dynamically reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii. “The FLC
`device displays one frame from a set of phase CGHs which have been calculated
`off-line at an earlier stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on demand.”
`Warr Thesis at 33. “The SLM display area is then divided into distinct sub-
`holograms, such that every input source is deflected by a different CGH.” Warr
`Thesis at 89.
`
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 89. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 61.
`[1e.] whereby upon illumination of said groups by respective light beams,
`respective emergent light beams from the groups are controllable
`independently of each other.
`Warr Thesis discloses the illumination of said groups by respective light beams.
`“The collimation array in plane P2 is arranged exactly one focal distance in front
`of the fibre ends so that the Gaussian signal beams are individually collimated
`through the FLC-SLM. The SLM display area is then divided into distinct sub-
`holograms, such that every input source is deflected by a different CGH.” Warr
`Thesis at 89.
`
`Warr Thesis at 89.
`The emergent light beams are also independently controlled by the devices in
`Warr Thesis. “Each of the four beams was deflected by a separate 80x80 pixel
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`region of the 2DX320IR SLM. This transmissive FLC device has 80μm pixels, a
`28° FLC switching angle, and exhibits a peak response around  = l.lμm
`wavelength.” Warr Thesis at 103.
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 103. Warr Thesis also teaches fine tuning of routing holograms.
`“The hologram frame set can again be designed to compensate for
`manufacturing tolerances as was demonstrated during the 1-to-15 experiment. As
`well as compensating for beam offsets (using the hologram splitters) and tilts
`(using the hologram combiners), the CGHs may be ‘exclusive-OR’ combined
`with Fresnel zone-like patterns [116] to counteract experimental differences in
`lateral positioning or focal length of the GRINs.” Warr Thesis at 107. “The
`optical configuration might therefore enable the construction of dense optical
`switches that have a large enough aperture to simultaneously interconnect several
`FLC-over-silicon backplane SLMs, encompassing a huge number of interconnect
`pixels.” Warr Thesis at 107. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 62.
`[2.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1, wherein
`control of said light beams is selected from the group comprising: control of
`direction, control of power, focussing, aberration compensation, sampling
`and beam shaping.
`Claim 2 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`The disclosure found in Warr Thesis discussed in claim [1e.] above includes
`control of direction and control of power as discussed above. See Hall Decl. at
`¶¶ 70-72.
`[4a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1,
`comprising: providing a discrete number of voltages available for
`application to each phase modulating element;
`Claim 4 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`A discrete number of voltages available for application to each phase modulating
`element is disclosed in Warr Thesis. “Addressing takes place by applying an
`enabling voltage to a single row and then writing data on all columns. The full
`frame is addressed by repeating this process down all rows. The inherent
`bistability of fully surface-stabilised FLC materials means that the data will be
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`retained whilst the other rows are being scanned.” Warr Thesis at 17. “SLMs
`typically consist of an array of individually controllable pixels. A number of
`suitable technologies are currently available for displaying CGH diffraction
`patterns… Ferroelectric liquid crystal SLMs [30] are limited to binary
`modulation states when driven in their usual mode of operation, but they
`potentially operate much faster than nematics, with material switching speeds of
`the order of 10μs.” Warr Thesis at 7.
`
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 19. See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 73-74.
`[4b.] on the basis of the respective generated holograms, determining the
`desired level of phase modulation at a predetermined point on each phase
`modulating element and
`Because the computer generated holograms are programmed and stored in the
`device in Warr Thesis, there is a desired level of phase modulation at each phase
`modulating element. “This is achieved by the use of programmable computer-
`generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC)
`spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-dimensional binary
`modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically reconfigurable diffraction
`pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii. “The FLC device displays one frame from a set of
`phase CGHs which have been calculated off-line at an earlier stage and placed
`in a frame store to be recalled on demand.” Warr Thesis at 33.See Hall Decl. at ¶
`75.
`[4c.] choosing for each phase modulating element the available voltage
`which corresponds most closely to the desired level.
`The device in Warr Thesis chooses for each phase modulating element the
`available voltage which corresponds most closely to the desired level. “This is
`achieved by the use of programmable computer-generated holograms (CGHs)
`displayed on a ferroelectric liquid crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM).
`The SLM provides fast 2-dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and
`acts as a dynamically reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii.
`“The FLC device displays one frame from a set of phase CGHs which have been
`calculated off-line at an earlier stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on
`demand.” Warr Thesis at 33. “Addressing takes place by applying an enabling
`voltage to a single row and then writing data on all columns. The full frame is
`6
`
`
`
`

`

`addressed by repeating this process down all rows. The inherent bistability of
`fully surface-stabilised FLC materials means that the data will be retained whilst
`the other rows are being scanned.” Warr Thesis at 17. “SLMs typically consist
`of an array of individually controllable pixels. A number of suitable
`technologies are currently available for displaying CGH diffraction patterns…
`Ferroelectric liquid crystal SLMs [30] are limited to binary modulation states
`when driven in their usual mode of operation, but they potentially operate much
`faster than nematics, with material switching speeds of the order of 10μs.” Warr
`Thesis at 7.
`
`
`
`Warr Thesis at 19. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 76.
`[5a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1,
`comprising: providing a discrete number of voltages available for
`application to each phase modulating element;
`Claim 5 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above. See also [4a.]. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 77.
`[5b.] determining a subset of the available voltages which provides the best
`fit to the generated hologram.
`Warr Thesis determines a subset of the available voltages which provides the
`best fit to the generated hologram. “This is achieved by the use of programmable
`computer-generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid
`crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-
`dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically
`reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii. “The FLC device
`displays one frame from a set of phase CGHs which have been calculated off-
`line at an earlier stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on demand.”
`Warr Thesis at 33. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 78.
`[6a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1, further
`comprising the step of storing said control data wherein the step of storing
`said control data comprises calculating an initial hologram using a desired
`direction change of a beam of light,
`Claim 6 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`Warr Thesis discloses a device where storing control data includes the step of
`7
`
`
`
`

`

`calculating an initial hologram. “This is achieved by the use of programmable
`computer-generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid crystal
`(FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-dimensional
`binary modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically reconfigurable
`diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii. “The FLC device displays one frame
`from a set of phase CGHs which have been calculated off-line at an earlier
`stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on demand.” Warr Thesis at 33.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 79-80.
`[6b.] applying said initial hologram to a group of phase modulating
`elements, and
`Warr Thesis discloses a device that applies the initial hologram to a group of
`phase modulating elements. “This is achieved by the use of programmable
`computer-generated holograms (CGHs) displayed on a ferroelectric liquid
`crystal (FLC) spatial light modulator (SLM). The SLM provides fast 2-
`dimensional binary modulation of coherent light and acts as a dynamically
`reconfigurable diffraction pattern.” Warr Thesis at viii. “The FLC device
`displays one frame from a set of phase CGHs which have been calculated off-
`line at an earlier stage and placed in a frame store to be recalled on demand.”
`Warr Thesis at 33. See Hall Decl. at ¶ 81.
`[6c.] correcting the initial hologram to obtain an improved result.
`Warr Thesis also teaches how to correct an initial hologram. “Slight
`irregularities in the fibre array pitch meant that the 15 remaining fibre locations
`in the replay plane had to be experimentally determined. This was achieved by
`rapidly displaying SLM hologram frames to raster scan a replay spot about a
`9x9 grid in the expected vicinity of each fibre core. The pitch of this grid was the
`holographic replay resolution of xr = 4.28μm and the search goal was to find a
`fibre mode of diameter 2w0  5.6μm. Each fibre core location was then
`determined from the hologram frame that maximised the optical signal reaching
`the corresponding photodiode receiver.” Warr Thesis at 36-37. “Although this
`scanning process is somewhat laborious, future characterisation of fibre arrays
`could easily be automated by feeding the photodiode signals back to the
`hologram frame store controller. Once the switch is operational, this technique
`could also be used as an adaptive method of maintaining a fibre launch in the
`presence of low frequency vibrations or other disturbance.” Warr Thesis at 37.
`
`“The hologram frame set can again be designed to compensate for manufacturing
`tolerances as was demonstrated during the 1-to-15 experiment. As well as
`compensating for beam offsets (using the hologram splitters) and tilts (using the
`hologram combiners), the CGHs may be ‘exclusive-OR’ combined with Fresnel
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`zone-like patterns [116] to counteract experimental differences in lateral
`positioning or focal length of the GRINs.” Warr Thesis at 107.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶ 82.
`[8a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1, in which
`the SLM is integrated on a substrate and has an integrated quarter-wave
`plate
`Claim 8 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`Warr Thesis disclosed an integrated SLM with an integrated quarter wave plate.
`“The development of CMOS backplane SLMs has important implications for
`free-space optical architectures because they potentially provide the ability to
`have high pixel densities in very compact volumes. CMOS devices interface
`readily with other electronic components and typically operate an order of
`magnitude faster than their passive transmissive counterparts. The use of silicon
`circuitry also provides the opportunity for placing some local electronic
`processing at each pixel to enhance the device functionality.” Warr Thesis at
`19. “An alternative approach [62] obtains an aggregate electro-optic switching
`angle of 90 by using two layers of 45° material separated by a fixed (/4)-
`waveplate, but the critical optical alignment between the two pixel-planes that is
`required with this type of geometry makes it less attractive compared to the shift-
`invariant diffraction properties of normal FLC holograms.” Warr Thesis at 25.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 83-84.
`[8b.] whereby it is substantially polarisation insensitive.
`Warr Thesis discusses a substantially polarisation insensitive SLM in terms of
`the mathematical operation of these devices. “Until recently it had been assumed
`that polarisation insensitive operation could not be achieved with the more
`common smaller switching angle materials and thus the application of FLC-SLM
`technology to optical fibre switches appeared to be severely limited. This chapter
`presents a full polarisation analysis and reveals that the accepted view is not in
`fact true. FLC-SLMs configured as diffractive optical elements are actually
`inherently insensitive to the polarisation of the light passing through them
`[63]. This realisation has led to the first demonstration of dynamic polarisation
`independent single-mode fibre interconnects [64], and also has important
`implications for a much wider range of optical processing applications.” Warr
`Thesis at 25.
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`“Equation (3.10) predicts that in the absence of polarisers, the amount of light
`that is diffracted by an FLC-CGH is always a constant ratio of the input optical
`power. Simulations of random and time-variant polarisation states show that the
`distribution of light away from the zero-order is unaffected by the removal of
`polarisers and apart from the addition of the central spot, the holograms replay as
`before.” Warr Thesis at 29.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶ 84.
`[9a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1, wherein
`the phase-modulating elements are substantially reflective,
`Claim 9 depends from claim 1, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`Warr Thesis discloses an SLM where the phase-modulating elements are
`substantially reflective. “A promising innovation in the development of
`miniature FLC devices is to construct SLMs directly on the top of CMOS VLSI
`silicon chips [15]. These devices operate in reflection and each pixel is
`addressed by a signal applied to an aluminium pad which doubles as the pixel
`mirror, figure 2.6. The use of CMOS circuitry at each pixel also removes the
`reliance on full FLC material bistability and enables pixel pitches down to about
`25μm to be addressed relatively easily.” Warr Thesis at 17.
`
`Warr Thesis at 18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`“Figure 6.4(b) shows a similar design principle applied to a crossbar. Each GRIN
`is glued to a fibre bundle and to a reflective SLM. The GRINs therefore form an
`array of compact one-to-any switches, and a dilated crossbar structure may be
`created by appropriately splicing the fibres between GRINs using the
`interconnect pattern from figure 5.1. This crossbar design is particularly
`attractive because of its simplicity and robustness, and because there is no limit
`on the number of FLC-over-silicon SLM chips that may be used in the
`construction of the switch.” Warr Thesis at 115.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 85-86.
`[9b.] whereby emergent beams are deflected from the specular reflection
`direction.
`Deflection from the specular reflection direction in reflective SLMs is found in
`Warr Thesis. “The collimation array in plane P2 is arranged exactly one focal
`distance in front of the fibre ends so that the Gaussian signal beams are
`individually collimated through the FLC-SLM. The SLM display area is then
`divided into distinct sub-holograms, such that every input source is deflected by
`a different CGH…For any particular input fibre, the position of the first-order
`replay spot on the mirror's surface relative to the system axis, is determined by
`the angle of deflection of that input’s sub-hologram frame.” Warr Thesis at 89.
`“This array was then incorporated into the optical configuration shown in figure
`5.10. Each of the four beams was deflected by a separate 80x80 pixel region of
`the 2DX320IR SLM.” Warr Thesis at 103.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶ 86.
`[11a.] An optical device comprising an SLM and a control circuit, the SLM
`having a two-dimensional array of controllable phase-modulating elements
`and
`Claim 11 is substantially similar to claim 1; the arguments above for claim 1
`closely track those for claim 11.
`See [1 pre.]; Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 64-65.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`[11b.] the control circuit having a store constructed and arranged to hold
`plural items of control data, the control circuit being constructed and
`arranged to delineate groups of individual phase-modulating elements,
`See [1 pre.], [1a.], and [1b.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 64.
`[11c.] to select, from stored control data, control data for each group of
`phase-modulating elements, and
`See [1b.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 64.
`[11d.] to generate from the respective selected control data a respective
`hologram at each group of phase-modulating elements,
`See [1c.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 64.
`[11e.] wherein the control circuit is further constructed and arranged to
`vary the delineation of the groups and/or the selection of control data,
`See [1d.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 64.
`[11f.] whereby upon illumination of said groups by respective light beams,
`respective emergent light beams from the groups are controllable
`independently of each other.
`See [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 64.
`[12a.] An optical device according to claim 11, having sensor devices
`arranged to detect light emergent from the SLM,
`Claim 12 depends from claim 11, which is anticipated for the reasons discussed
`above.
`Light sensors are disclosed in Warr Thesis. “Essentially backplane SLMs
`operate as optically-readable memory. Although the integration of photodiodes
`onto the silicon circuitry also introduces the possibility of optically addressed
`‘smart pixels’ [50], usually we are only concerned with electronic addressing
`schemes (EASLMs).” Warr Thesis at 19. “Slight irregularities in the fibre array
`pitch meant that the 15 remaining fibre locations in the replay plane had to be
`experimentally determined. This was achieved by rapidly displaying SLM
`hologram frames to raster scan a replay spot about a 9x9 grid in the expected
`vicinity of each fibre core. The pitch of this grid was the holographic replay
`resolution of xr = 4.28μm and the search goal was to find a fibre mode of
`diameter 2w0  5.6μm. Each fibre core location was then determined from the
`hologram frame that maximised the optical signal reaching the corresponding
`photodiode receiver.” Warr Thesis at 36-37. “Although this scanning process is
`somewhat laborious, future characterisation of fibre arrays could easily be
`automated by feeding the photodiode signals back to the hologram frame store
`controller. Once the switch is operational, this technique could also be used as
`an adaptive method of maintaining a fibre launch in the presence of low
`frequency vibrations or other disturbance.” Warr Thesis at 37. “Integration of
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`photodiodes onto the silicon surface might also allow optical control signals to
`be passed directly to the electronic hardware and the routeing hologram patterns
`might be stored and recalled directly from memory areas within the device
`circuitry.” Warr Thesis at 60.
`
`“The hologram frame set can again be designed to compensate for
`manufacturing tolerances as was demonstrated during the 1-to-15 experiment.
`As well as compensating for beam offsets (using the hologram splitters) and tilts
`(using the hologram combiners), the CGHs may be ‘exclusive-OR’ combined
`with Fresnel zone-like patterns [116] to counteract experimental differences in
`lateral positioning or focal length of the GRINs.” Warr Thesis at 107.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 87-88.
`[12b.] the control circuit being responsive to signals from the sensor devices
`to vary said delineation and/or said selection.
`See [12a.].
`[14a.] An optical routing device having at least first and second SLMs and a
`control circuit,
`With the exception of the requirement that Claim 14 have a first and a second
`SLM, claim 14 is substantially similar to claim 1; the arguments above for claim
`1 closely track those for claim 14.
`
`See [1 pre.], [1a.], and [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 66-67.
`
`Warr Thesis discloses a double-SLM arrangement. “The only method of
`breaking the symmetry of a diffractive optical element is to effectively ‘blaze’ it
`by introducing additional phase levels, hence forcing the hologram function
`CGH(Xm, Yn) to become complex-valued. Although it is possible to generate
`four-levels of phase (0, π/2, π, 3π/2) using a combination of two distinct FLC-
`SLM devices in conjunction with a waveplate [71- 73], the alignment and control
`of such a system is difficult, typically requiring extra lenses to image one device
`onto the other.” Warr Thesis at 44. “A second method of achieving asymmetric
`replay fields is to concatenate several binary FLC devices [39].” Warr Thesis at
`114.
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`Warr Thesis at 89.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶ 68.
`[14b.] the first SLM being disposed to receive respective light beams from
`an input fibre array, and
`See [14a.], [1 pre.], and [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14c.] the second SLM being disposed to receive emergent light from the
`first SLM and to provide light to an output fibre array,
`See [14a.], [1 pre.], and [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14d.] the first and second SLMs each having a respective two-dimensional
`array of controllable phase-modulating elements and
`See [14a.], [1 pre.], [1a.], and [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14e.] the control circuit having a store constructed and arranged to hold
`plural items of control data,
`See [14a.], [1 pre.], [1a.], and [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14f.] the control circuit being constructed and arranged to delineate groups
`of individual phase-modulating elements,
`See [1a.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14g.] to select, from stored control data, control data for each group of
`phase-modulating elements, and
`See [1b.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14h.] to generate from the respective selected control data a respective
`hologram at each group of phase-modulating elements,
`See [1c.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14i.] wherein the control circuit is further constructed and arranged to
`vary the delineation of the groups and/or the selection of control data,
`See [1d.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`[14j.] whereby upon illumination of said groups by respective light beams,
`respective emergent light beams from the groups are controllable
`independently of each other.
`See [1e.]; Hall Decl. at ¶ 66.
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`B. Ground 2: Claims 6 and 12 are rendered obvious by the
`combination of Warr Thesis and Johansson
`
`
`
`‘710 Claim Language
`Followed by corresponding features in the reference.
`[6a.] A method of operating an optical device according to claim 1, further
`comprising the step of storing said control data wherein the step of storing
`said control data comprises calculating an initial hologram using a desired
`direction change of a beam of light,
`See Section I.A, claim 1 for a description of how Warr Thesis meets the elements
`from claim 1. Also see Section I.A, [6a.] where it was demonstrated that Warr
`Thesis discloses this element. But to the extent it is found that Warr Thesis does
`not disclose this element, Johansson does disclose this element.
`
`
`
`
`Johansson at 349.
`
`“On start-up of the switch, a sequence of holograms is displayed on the SLM,
`and the beam is continuously scanned over the output fibers. By simultaneously
`monitoring the output power of the channels, the specific holograms needed to
`deflect the beam to the eight output channels with maximum output power, for
`the present output fiber geometry, can be determined. Once these holograms are
`determined, they are stored in the computer memory and can be displayed when
`the switch is to be reconfigured.
`If the monitored output power for an established channel decreases due to
`mechanical drift during operation, the displayed hologram and consequently the
`beam deflection angle can be adjusted to restore the original power level.”
`Johansson at 349.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 55-62, 90-91.
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`[6b.] applying said initial hologram to a group of phase modulating
`elements, and
`See Section I.A, claim 1 for a description of how Warr Thesis meets the elements
`from claim 1. Also see Section I.A, [6b.] where it was demonstrated that Warr
`Thesis discloses this element. But to the extent that Warr Thesis does not
`disclose this element, Johansson does disclose this element.
`
`
`
`
`Johansson at 349.
`
`“On start-up of the switch, a sequence of holograms is displayed on the SLM,
`and the beam is continuously scanned over the output fibers. By simultaneously
`monitoring the output power of the channels, the specific holograms needed to
`deflect the beam to the eight output channels with maximum output power, for
`the present output fiber geometry, can be determined. Once these holograms are
`determined, they are stored in the computer memory and can be displayed when
`the switch is to be reconfigured.
`If the monitored output power for an established channel decreases due to
`mechanical drift during operation, the displayed hologram and consequently the
`beam deflection angle can be adjusted to restore the original power level.”
`Johansson at 349.
`See Hall Decl. at ¶¶ 55-62, 90-91.
`[6c.] correcting the initial hologram to obtain an improved result.
`See Section I.A, claim 1 for a description of how Warr Thesis meets the elements
`from claim 1. Also see Section I.A, [6c.] where it was demonstrated that Warr
`Thesis discloses this element. But to the extent that Warr Thesis does not
`disclose this element, Johansson does disclose this element.
`
`
`“We have used a dynamic diffractive spatial light modulator for adaptive beam
`steering. With adaptive beam steering it is possible to substantially reduce the
`alignment accuracy needed for the assembly of a free-space optical switch and to
`16
`
`
`
`

`

`make it adaptive to changes in the environment during operation.” Johansson at
`347. “By using a feedback loop, monitoring the output power from the output
`channels, it is possible to adjust the SLM beam deflection angle to compensate
`for misalignments.” Johansson at 348.
`
`
`Johansson at 348. “The phase grating displayed on the FLC SLM determines the
`beam def

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket