throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 16
`Entered: October 27, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2014-00452
`Patent 6,323,853 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL R. ZECHER, NEIL T. POWELL, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POWELL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00452
`Patent 6,323,853 B1
`
`
`A conference call in the above proceeding was held on October 20,
`2014, between respective counsel for Petitioners and Patent Owner, and
`Judges Zecher, Powell, and Cherry. Patent Owner initiated the conference
`call to satisfy the requirement of conferring with us prior to filing a Motion
`to Amend under 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a).
`DISCUSSION
`In the call, Patent Owner indicated that it sought to present in its
`Motion to Amend an independent claim containing all of the current
`limitations of independent claim 1 plus certain additional words. We
`informed Patent Owner that the proper way to do so is to present a proposed
`substitute independent claim 80 with all of the limitations of independent
`claim 1 and the desired additional words. We further informed Patent
`Owner that the proposed substitute independent claim 80 must show the
`words added compared to independent claim 1, and must appear within the
`Motion to Amend, itself.
`After receiving this advice, Patent Owner sought guidance regarding
`how it might structure the Motion to Amend in order to preserve the
`substance of dependent claims 2–79 if independent claim 1 ultimately gets
`replaced with proposed substitute independent claim 80. We informed
`Patent Owner that it could propose substitute dependent claims that include
`the same limitations as dependent claims 2–79 but depend from proposed
`substitute independent claim 80. We further informed Patent Owner that, if
`it proposes substitute dependent claims that are the same as claims 2–79 but
`are amended only to depend from proposed substitute independent claim 80,
`Patent Owner may list such proposed substitute dependent claims in a claims
`appendix. We indicated that, if Patent Owner files such a claims appendix,
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00452
`Patent 6,323,853 B1
`
`the claims appendix will not count toward the fifteen page limit for a Motion
`to Amend. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.24(a)(v). We noted, however, that Patent
`Owner must list and address proposed substitute independent claim 80
`within the Motion to Amend, itself.
`In view of this discussion, Petitioners asked certain questions
`regarding how any proposed substitute dependent claims listed in a claims
`appendix would be treated on the merits. We took this opportunity to
`remind the parties that Patent Owner bears the burden of proof to establish
`the patentability of any proposed substitute claim. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c);
`Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., Case IPR2012-00027, slip op. at 2
`(PTAB June 11, 2013) (Paper 26). For further guidance regarding the
`substance and mechanics of a Motion to Amend under 37 C.F.R. § 42.121,
`we directed the parties to Toyota Motor Corp. v. American Vehicular
`Sciences LLC, Case IPR2013-00423 (PTAB March 7, 2014) (Paper 27).
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner has satisfied the requirement of
`conferring with us prior to filing a Motion to Amend under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.121(a); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must address any proposed
`substitute independent claim in the Motion to Amend, itself, but it may
`provide a claims appendix that lists proposed substitute dependent claims,
`each of which is amended only to depend from the proposed substitute
`independent claim. A claims appendix satisfying this requirement will not
`count toward the fifteen page limit for the Motion to Amend.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00452
`Patent 6,323,853 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Matthew A. Smith
`Zhuanjia Gu
`TURNER BOYD LLP
`smith@turnerboyd.com
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert M. Asher
`Bruce D. Sunstein
`SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP
`rasher@sunsteinlaw.com
`bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket