`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`Google Inc. and Motorola Mobility LLC
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2014-00452
`
`Patent No. 6,323,853
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER ARENDI S.A.R.L.’S
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.70
`
`
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. (“Patent Owner”) hereby requests the opportunity to have
`
`an oral argument at the Board pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Patent Owner
`
`requests an oral hearing totaling one hour to be divided equally between the Patent
`
`Owner, on the one hand, and Petitioners, on the other.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), and without intending to waive any issue not
`
`specifically identified, Patent Owner submits the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Failure to show unpatentability of claims 1-9, 11, 13-29, 38-45, 57-64, 66,
`
`68-75, 77 and 79 for obviousness over Goodhand.
`
`2. Failure to show unpatentability of claims 6, 10, 12, 21, 27, 30-37, 42, 46-56,
`
`61, 65, 67, 72, 76 and 78 for obviousness over Goodhand and Padwick.
`
`3. Any issue raised in Petitioners’ or Patent Owner’s Papers, including but not
`
`limited to the Petition (Paper 1), Patent Owner’s response (Paper 17) or
`
`Petitioners’ reply (Paper 23) and accompanying exhibits.
`
`4. Rebuttal to Petitioners’ presentation as to all matters.
`
`Patent Owner requests that the Board provide audio-visual equipment to
`
`display demonstrative exhibits, including a projector to be connected to a laptop
`
`and a screen for displaying documents.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Dated: March 10, 2015
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Robert Asher, #30,445/
`Robert Asher
`Registration No. 30,445
` Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
` 125 Summer Street
` Boston, MA 02110-1618
`(617) 443-9292
`Attorney for Patent Owner, Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` It is certified that on March 10, 2015, copies of the Request for Oral
`
`Argument under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 have been served on Petitioners as provided in
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) by filing this document through the Patent Review Processing
`
`System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail directed to the attorneys of
`
`record for the Petitioner at the following addresses:
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONERS GOOGLE INC. AND
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`
`MATTHEW A. SMITH
`smith@turnerboyd.com
`Registration No. 49,003
`TURNER BOYD LLP
`702 Marshall St., Ste. 640
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Tel: (650) 265-6109
`Fax: (650) 521-5931
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONERS GOOGLE INC. AND
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`
`ZHUANJIA GU
`gu@turnerboyd.com
`Registration No. 51,758
` TURNER BOYD LLP
` 702 Marshall St., Ste. 640
` Redwood City, CA 94063
` Tel: (650) 265-6109
` Fax: (650) 521-5931
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 10, 2015
`
`ROBERT J. KENT
`kent@turnerboyd.com
` TURNER BOYD LLP
` 702 Marshall St., Ste. 640
` Redwood City, CA 94063
` Tel: (650) 265-6109
` Fax: (650) 521-5931
` /Robert Asher, #30,445/
`Robert Asher
`Registration No. 30,445
`Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
`125 Summer Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`Tel: (617) 443-9292
`Fax: (617) 443-0004
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
