throbber
EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`References cited herein:
`
`(cid:120) U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759 (“‘759 Patent”)
`
`(cid:120) U.S. Pat. No. 6,413,382 (“Wang”)
`
`(cid:120) A. A. Kudryavtsev, et al, Ionization relaxation in a plasma produced by a pulsed inert-gas
`discharge, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 28(1), January 1983 (“Kudryavtsev”)
`
`(cid:120) U.S. Pat. No. 5,247,531 (“Muller-Horsche”)
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`[1pre.] A magnetically
`enhanced sputtering
`source comprising:
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses a
`magnetically enhanced sputtering source.
`
`Wang at Title (“Pulsed sputtering with a small rotating
`magnetron.”).
`
`[1a.] an anode;
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses an anode.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1 (“FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus having a pulsed power
`source.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:40-41 (“an anode 130 is positioned in the vacuum
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`1
`
`INTEL 1233
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`chamber 104 proximate to the cathode assembly.”)
`
`Wang at Fig. 1
`
`Wang at 3:66-4:1 (“A grounded shield 24 protects the chamber
`walls from sputter deposition and also acts as a grounded anode for
`the cathode of the negatively biased target 14.”) (emphasis added).
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses a cathode
`assembly that is positioned adjacent to the anode, the cathode
`assembly including a sputtering target.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1
`
`[1b.] a cathode
`assembly that is
`positioned adjacent to
`the anode, the cathode
`assembly including a
`sputtering target;
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1 (“FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus having a pulsed power
`source.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:40-41 (“an anode 130 is positioned in the vacuum
`chamber 104 proximate to the cathode assembly.”)
`
`Wang at Fig. 1
`
`Wang at 3:66-4:1 (“A grounded shield 24 protects the chamber
`walls from sputter deposition and also acts as a grounded anode for
`the cathode of the negatively biased target 14.”)
`
`[1c.] an ionization
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses an ionization
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Claims 17 and 39
`
`source that generates a
`weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to the anode
`and the cathode
`assembly;
`
`[1d.] a magnet that is
`positioned to generate a
`magnetic field
`proximate to the
`weakly-ionized plasma,
`the magnetic field
`substantially trapping
`electrons in the weakly-
`ionized plasma
`proximate to the
`sputtering target; and
`
`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`source that generates a weakly-ionized plasma proximate to the
`anode and the cathode assembly.
`
`Wang at Fig. 1.
`
`Wang at 7:17-31 (“The background power level PB is chosen to
`exceed the minimum power necessary to support a plasma... [T]he
`application of the high peak power PP quickly causes the already
`existing plasma to spread and increases the density of the plasma.”)
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power PP is at least 10 times
`the background power PB … and most preferably 1000 times to
`achieve the greatest effect of the invention. A background power PB
`of 1 kW [causes] little if any actual sputter deposition.”)
`
`Wang at 4:23-31 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is thus creating a
`region 42 of a high-density plasma (HDP)…”)
`
`Wang at 7:47-49 (“The initial plasma ignition needs to be performed
`only once and at much lower power levels so that particulates
`produced by arcing are much reduced.”).
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses a magnet that
`is positioned to generate a magnetic field proximate to the weakly-
`ionized plasma, the magnetic field substantially trapping electrons in
`the weakly-ionized plasma proximate to the sputtering target.
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:10-12 (“FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100…” that has a magnet
`126.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:4-10 [describing the prior art Fig. 1] (“The
`electrons, which cause ionization, are generally confined by the
`magnetic fields produced by the magnet 126. The magnetic
`confinement is strongest in a confinement region 142….”)
`
`Wang at Fig. 1.
`
`Wang at 4:23-27 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is disposed in the
`back of the target 14 to create a magnetic field near the face of the
`target 14 which traps electrons from the plasma to increase the
`electron density.”)
`
`[1e.] a power supply
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev discloses a power
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`3
`
`

`

`Claims 17 and 39
`
`generating a voltage
`pulse that produces an
`electric field between
`the cathode assembly
`and the anode, the
`power supply being
`configured to generate
`the voltage pulse with
`an amplitude and a rise
`time that increases an
`excitation rate of
`ground state atoms that
`are present in the
`weakly-ionized plasma
`to create a multi-step
`ionization process that
`generates a strongly-
`ionized plasma, which
`comprises ions that
`sputter target material,
`from the weakly-
`ionized plasma, the
`multi-step ionization
`process comprising
`exciting the ground
`state atoms to generate
`excited atoms, and then
`ionizing the excited
`atoms within the
`weakly-ionized plasma
`without forming an arc
`discharge.
`
`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`supply generating a voltage pulse that produces an electric field
`between the cathode assembly and the anode, the power supply
`being configured to generate the voltage pulse with an amplitude
`and a rise time that increases an excitation rate of ground state atoms
`that are present in the weakly-ionized plasma to create a multi-step
`ionization process that generates a strongly-ionized plasma, which
`comprises ions that sputter target material, from the weakly-ionized
`plasma, the multi-step ionization process comprising exciting the
`ground state atoms to generate excited atoms, and then ionizing the
`excited atoms within the weakly-ionized plasma without forming an
`arc discharge.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 5
`
`Wang at Figs. 6, 7.
`
`Wang at 7:61-62 (“The pulsed DC power supply 80 produces a train
`of negative voltage pulses.”).
`
`Wang at 5:23-27 (“[The pulse’s] exact shape depends on the design
`of the pulsed DC power supply 80, and significant rise times and fall
`times are expected.”).
`
`Wang at 4:29-31 (“increases the sputtering rate...”).
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power level PP is at least 10
`times the background power level PB, … most preferably 1000 times
`to achieve the greatest effects of the invention. A background
`power PB of 1 kW will typically be sufficient…”)
`
`Wang at 7:31-39 (“The SIP reactor is advantageous for a low-power,
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`low-pressure background period since the small rotating SIP
`magnetron can maintain a plasma at a lower power and lower
`pressure than can a larger stationary magnetron. However, it is
`possible to combine highly ionized sputtering during the pulses With
`significant neutral sputtering during the back ground period.”).
`
`Wang at 7:3-6 (“Plasma ignition, particularly in plasma sputter
`reactors, has a tendency to generate particles during the initial
`arcing, which may dislodge large particles from the target or
`chamber.”)
`
`Wang at 7:47-49 (“The initial plasma ignition needs be performed
`only once and at much lower power levels so that particulates
`produced by arcing are much reduced.”).
`
`Wang at 7:13-28 (“Accordingly, it is advantageous to use a target
`power waveform illustrated in FIG. 6… As a result, once the
`plasma has been ignited at the beginning of sputtering prior to the
`illustrated waveform…”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (“Since the effects studied in this
`work are characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly
`applied to a weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when
`studying emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown,
`laser sparks, etc.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 1
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 6
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`5
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 7 (“The behavior of the increase in ne
`with time thus enables us to arbitrarily divide the ionization process
`into two stages, which we will call the slow and fast growth stages.
`Fig. 1 illustrates the relationships between the main electron currents
`in terms of the atomic energy levels during the slow and fast
`stages.”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 6 (“For nearly stationary n2 [excited
`atom density] values … there is an explosive increase in ne [plasma
`density]. The subsequent increase in ne then reaches its maximum
`value, equal to the rate of excitation [equation omitted], which is
`several orders of magnitude greater than the ionization rate during
`the initial stage.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Abstract (“[I]n a pulsed inert-gas discharge plasma
`at moderate pressures… [i]t is shown that the electron density
`increases explosively in time due to accumulation of atoms in the
`lowest excited states.”)
`
`If one of ordinary skill, applying Wang’s power levels did not
`experience Kudryavtsev’s “explosive increase” in plasma density, it
`would have been obvious to adjust the operating parameters, e.g.,
`increase the pulse length and/or pressure, so as to trigger
`Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization. One of ordinary skill would
`have been motivated to use Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization in
`Wang so as to increase plasma density and thereby increase the
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`6
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`17. The sputtering
`source of claim 1
`wherein the ionization
`source is chosen from
`the group comprising a
`UV source, an X-ray
`source, an electron
`beam source, and an
`ion beam source.
`
`sputtering rate. Further, use of Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Wang
`would have been a combination of old elements that yielded
`predictable results of increasing plasma density and multi-step
`ionization.
`
`Kudryavtsev states, “[s]ince the effects studied in this work are
`characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly applied to a
`weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when studying
`emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown, laser
`sparks, etc.” Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (Ex. 1004). Because
`Wang applies voltage pulses that “suddenly generate an electric
`field,” one of ordinary skill reading Wang would have been
`motivated to consider Kudryavtsev and to use Kudryavtsev’s fast
`stage in Wang.
`
`The combination of Wang, Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`discloses the ionization source is chosen from the group comprising
`a UV source, an X-ray source, an electron beam source, and an ion
`beam source.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Muller-Horsche at Title (“an apparatus for preionizing a pulsed gas
`laser.”)
`
`Muller-Horsche at 1:40-42 (“Typically, in such a preionizing
`relatively low electron concentrations (for example 107
`electrons/cm3) are generated in the discharge space.”).
`
`Muller-Horsche at 2:59-63 (emphasis added) (“[electrodes 12, 12’]
`generates a corona discharge on the dielectric tubes 14, 14’. The
`corona discharge in turn emits UV radiation which preionizes the
`gas…”)
`
`Muller-Horsche at 1:34-36 ([preionization] “is carried out in
`particular also to avoid arc discharges.”).
`
`In the field of pulsed lasers, as illustrated by Muller-Horsche, the
`use of pre-ionization as a means of avoiding arcing is common
`knowledge. Further, those of ordinary skill in the field of plasma
`sputtering typically look to pulsed laser plasma references when
`studying features of plasmas such as arc avoidance.
`
`Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`7
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`motivated to combine the use of different ionization sources, such as
`those described by Muller-Horsche with the teachings of Wang. A
`combination of Muller-Horche’s UV source with Wang would be a
`combination of known elements in which each element performed as
`expected.
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses a method of
`generating sputtering flux.
`
`Wang at Title (“Pulsed sputtering with a small rotating
`magnetron.”).
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses ionizing a
`feed gas to generate a weakly-ionized plasma proximate to a
`sputtering target.
`
`Wang at Fig. 1
`
`Wang at 4:5-6 (“A sputter working gas such as argon is supplied
`from a gas source 32….”).
`
`Wang at 4:20-21 (“… a reactive gas, for example nitrogen is
`supplied to the processing space 22….”).
`
`Wang at 7:17-31 (“The background power level PB is chosen to
`exceed the minimum power necessary to support a plasma... [T]he
`application of the high peak power PP quickly causes the already
`existing plasma to spread and increases the density of the plasma.”)
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power PP is at least 10 times
`the background power PB … and most preferably 1000 times to
`achieve the greatest effect of the invention. A background power PB
`of 1 kW [causes] little if any actual sputter deposition.”)
`
`Wang at 4:23-31 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is thus creating a
`region 42 of a high-density plasma (HDP)…”)
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses generating a
`magnetic field proximate to the weakly-ionized plasma, the
`magnetic field substantially trapping electrons in the weakly-ionized
`plasma proximate to the sputtering target.
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:10-12 (“FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100…” that has a magnet
`
`[20pre.] A method of
`generating sputtering
`flux, the method
`comprising:
`
`[20a.] ionizing a feed
`gas to generate a
`weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to a
`sputtering target;
`
`[20b.] generating a
`magnetic field
`proximate to the
`weakly-ionized plasma,
`the magnetic field
`substantially trapping
`electrons in the weakly-
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`8
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`126.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:4-10 [describing the prior art Fig. 1] (“The
`electrons, which cause ionization, are generally confined by the
`magnetic fields produced by the magnet 126. The magnetic
`confinement is strongest in a confinement region 142….”)
`
`Wang at Fig. 1.
`
`Wang at 4:23-27 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is disposed in the
`back of the target 14 to create a magnetic field near the face of the
`target 14 which traps electrons from the plasma to increase the
`electron density.”)
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses applying a
`voltage pulse to the weakly-ionized plasma, an amplitude and a rise
`time of the voltage pulse being chosen to increase an excitation rate
`of ground state atoms that are present in the weakly-ionized plasma
`to create a multi-step ionization process that generates a strongly-
`ionized plasma, which comprises ions that sputter target material,
`from the weakly-ionized plasma, the multi-step ionization process
`comprising exciting the ground state atoms to generate excited
`atoms, and then ionizing the excited atoms within the weakly-
`ionized plasma without forming an arc discharge.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 5
`Wang at Figs. 6, 7.
`
`Wang at 7:61-62 (“The pulsed DC power supply 80 produces a train
`of negative voltage pulses.”).
`
`Wang at 5:23-27 (“[The pulse’s] exact shape depends on the design
`of the pulsed DC power supply 80, and significant rise times and fall
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`ionized plasma
`proximate to the
`sputtering target; and
`
`[20c.] applying a
`voltage pulse to the
`weakly-ionized plasma,
`an amplitude and a rise
`time of the voltage
`pulse being chosen to
`increase an excitation
`rate of ground state
`atoms that are present
`in the weakly-ionized
`plasma to create a
`multi-step ionization
`process that generates a
`strongly-ionized
`plasma, which
`comprises ions that
`sputter target material,
`from the weakly-
`ionized plasma, the
`multi-step ionization
`process comprising
`exciting the ground
`state atoms to generate
`excited atoms, and then
`ionizing the excited
`atoms within the
`weakly-ionized plasma
`without forming an arc
`discharge.
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`9
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`times are expected.”).
`
`Wang at 4:29-31 (“increases the sputtering rate...”).
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power level PP is at least 10
`times the background power level PB, … most preferably 1000 times
`to achieve the greatest effects of the invention. A background
`power PB of 1 kW will typically be sufficient…”)
`
`Wang at 7:31-39 (“The SIP reactor is advantageous for a low-power,
`low-pressure background period since the small rotating SIP
`magnetron can maintain a plasma at a lower power and lower
`pressure than can a larger stationary magnetron. However, it is
`possible to combine highly ionized sputtering during the pulses With
`significant neutral sputtering during the back ground period.”).
`
`Wang at 7:3-6 (“Plasma ignition, particularly in plasma sputter
`reactors, has a tendency to generate particles during the initial
`arcing, which may dislodge large particles from the target or
`chamber.”)
`
`Wang at 7:47-49 (“The initial plasma ignition needs be performed
`only once and at much lower power levels so that particulates
`produced by arcing are much reduced.”).
`
`Wang at 7:13-28 (“Accordingly, it is advantageous to use a target
`power waveform illustrated in FIG. 6… As a result, once the
`plasma has been ignited at the beginning of sputtering prior to the
`illustrated waveform…”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (“Since the effects studied in this
`work are characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly
`applied to a weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when
`studying emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown,
`laser sparks, etc.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 1
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`10
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 6
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 7 (“The behavior of the increase in ne
`with time thus enables us to arbitrarily divide the ionization process
`into two stages, which we will call the slow and fast growth stages.
`Fig. 1 illustrates the relationships between the main electron currents
`in terms of the atomic energy levels during the slow and fast
`stages.”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 6 (“For nearly stationary n2 [excited
`atom density] values … there is an explosive increase in ne [plasma
`density]. The subsequent increase in ne then reaches its maximum
`value, equal to the rate of excitation [equation omitted], which is
`several orders of magnitude greater than the ionization rate during
`the initial stage.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Abstract (“[I]n a pulsed inert-gas discharge plasma
`at moderate pressures… [i]t is shown that the electron density
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`11
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.11
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 17 and 39
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`
`increases explosively in time due to accumulation of atoms in the
`lowest excited states.”)
`
`If one of ordinary skill, applying Wang’s power levels did not
`experience Kudryavtsev’s “explosive increase” in plasma density, it
`would have been obvious to adjust the operating parameters, e.g.,
`increase the pulse length and/or pressure, so as to trigger
`Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization. One of ordinary skill would
`have been motivated to use Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization in
`Wang so as to increase plasma density and thereby increase the
`sputtering rate. Further, use of Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Wang
`would have been a combination of old elements that yielded
`predictable results of increasing plasma density and multi-step
`ionization.
`
`Kudryavtsev states, “[s]ince the effects studied in this work are
`characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly applied to a
`weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when studying
`emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown, laser
`sparks, etc.” Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (Ex. 1004). Because
`Wang applies voltage pulses that “suddenly generate an electric
`field,” one of ordinary skill reading Wang would have been
`motivated to consider Kudryavtsev and to use Kudryavtsev’s fast
`stage in Wang.
`
`The combination of Wang, Kudryavtsev and Muller-Horsche
`discloses controlling a temperature of the film.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 20.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 17.
`
`39. The method of
`claim 20 wherein the
`ionizing the feed gas
`comprises exposing the
`feed gas to at least one
`of a UV source, an X-
`ray source, an electron
`beam source, and an
`ion beam source.
`
`ActiveUS 122346312v.1
`
`12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket