throbber
Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition, hardness, and electrical
`resistivity of amorphous and crystalline alumina thin films
`Quan Li
`Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
`Yuan-Hsin Yu
`Department of Materials Engineering, Tatung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
`C. Singh Bhatia
`IBM Storage Systems Division, 5600 Cottle Road, San Jose, California 95193
`L. D. Marks
`Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
`S. C. Lee
`Department of Materials Engineering, Tatung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
`Y. W. Chunga)
`Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
`共Received 7 October 1999; accepted 12 May 2000兲
`Aluminum oxide films were grown by reactive magnetron sputtering. In order to maintain a stable
`deposition process and high deposition rate, a pulsed direct current bias was applied to the
`aluminum target and the substrate. An external solenoid was used to form a magnetic trap between
`the target and the substrate. The influence of substrate temperature, substrate bias, and the magnetic
`trap on film growth and properties was studied by different surface and thin-film analysis techniques
`and electrical measurements. Normally, amorphous alumina films were produced. However, under
`optimum process conditions, crystalline alumina films can be obtained at temperatures as low as
`250 °C, with a hardness ⬃20 GPa and excellent electrical insulating properties. © 2000 American
`Vacuum Society. 关S0734-2101共00兲04605-4兴
`
`that can be coated with alumina. Therefore, low-temperature
`synthesis of crystalline alumina is of great technological in-
`terest. One method to reduce the crystalline growth tempera-
`ture is to enhance the mobility of surface species via low-
`energy ion bombardment. To explore this strategy, Schneider
`et al.8 incorporated a rf coil to enhance ionization in a stan-
`dard magnetron sputter-deposition system. Together with
`pulsed dc substrate bias to enhance ion bombardment of the
`growing film, they demonstrated the growth of crystalline ␬
`alumina at relatively low substrate temperatures 共400 °C兲.
`In this study, we report the synthesis and properties of
`aluminum oxide thin films grown by pulsed dc magnetron
`sputtering. Instead of using a rf coil to increase the ion con-
`centration in the plasma, we used a magnetron sputter source
`equipped with strong magnets instead. An additional mag-
`netic field with the correct polarity was applied near the sub-
`strate to form a magnetic trap. With proper substrate biasing,
`this results in markedly improved ion currents to the sub-
`strate during film growth, as demonstrated by Petrov et al.9
`and Engstrom et al.10
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`Aluminum oxide thin films have many properties that are
`useful for applications in optical electronics, and cutting tool
`industries. Methods of synthesizing aluminum oxide thin
`films include chemical vapor deposition combined with ion-
`beam irradiation,1 molecular beam epitaxy using a solid alu-
`minum source and N2O,2 laser-induced deposition from con-
`densed layers of organoaluminum compounds and water,3
`and magnetron sputter deposition.4
`Traditional radio frequency 共rf兲 sputtering uses an alumi-
`num oxide target and generally results in low deposition
`rates. Direct current 共dc兲 reactive sputtering of aluminum in
`an oxygen/argon atmosphere can produce stoichiometric
`Al2O3 at high rates. The major requirement is careful control
`of the oxygen partial pressure5 so that the aluminum target
`will not be poisoned. In addition, pulsed dc magnetron sput-
`tering was used in recent years to minimize arcing during
`deposition of insulating materials such as alumina.6 In this
`case, the magnetron target voltage was bipolar at a certain
`frequency 共2–30 kHz typically兲. In the positive cycle, elec-
`trons travel towards the target and neutralize the positive
`charge accumulated on the target surface in the negative
`cycle. When this is done properly and at sufficiently high
`frequency, one obtains a stable, arc-free magnetron plasma.
`Generally, one needs to use substrate temperatures higher
`than 700 °C to obtain crystalline alumina.7 This high sub-
`strate temperature requirement limits the type of substrates
`
`a兲Electronic mail: ywchung@nwu.edu
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18„5…, SepÕOct 2000
`
`2333
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`Aluminum oxide films were grown using pulsed dc mag-
`netron sputtering in a single-cathode deposition chamber
`共Fig. 1兲. The base pressure of the chamber was below 1
`⫻10⫺7 Torr. We used a 2 in. aluminum target 共99.99% pu-
`rity兲 in an unbalanced magnetron. The target voltage was
`pulsed at 20 kHz 共50% duty cycle兲, with the positive voltage
`set at 10% of the negative voltage 共e.g., at a set target bias of
`0734-2101Õ2000Õ18„5…Õ2333Õ6Õ$17.00
`
`©2000 American Vacuum Society
`
`2333
`
`INTEL 1220
`
`

`

`2334
`
`Li etal.: Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition
`
`2334
`
`FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the deposition chamber.
`
`⫺400 V, the actual target voltage is a rectangular wave cy-
`cling between ⫺400 and ⫹40 V兲. The sputtering gas was an
`argon-8% oxygen mixture at a total pressure of 7 mTorr.
`Si共100兲 wafers were used as substrates. They were first
`cleaned by acetone and 2-propanol, then transferred into the
`chamber and reverse-sputter etched in an argon plasma at 60
`mTorr. In selected runs, glass substrates were used to con-
`firm visually the stoichiometry of alumina films 共stoichio-
`metric alumina films should be transparent兲. A 2 kHz pulsed
`dc bias 共similar pulse shape as that applied to the target兲 was
`applied to the substrate during deposition for low-energy ion
`bombardment and eliminating charging. This bias was varied
`from ⫺200 to ⫺400 V. Substrate temperatures were main-
`tained at or below 300 °C, as measured by a thermocouple
`attached to the substrate holder. A magnetic field was ap-
`plied 共via an external solenoid兲 during deposition to further
`increase the substrate ion-current density. The field at the
`substrate surface was 42 G. Unless otherwise stated, the
`thickness of all films was 300 nm.
`Auger electron spectroscopy was used to examine the
`chemical composition of the films. Film structure was char-
`acterized by standard x-ray diffraction using the Cu K␣line
`共0.154 nm兲 and transmission electron microscopy 共TEM兲.
`The surface topography was obtained by atomic force mi-
`croscopy 共AFM兲. The film hardness was measured using a
`Hysitron nanoindentor,
`analyzed by the Pharr–Oliver
`method.11 In the latter case, the penetration was kept at less
`than 15% of the film thickness to minimize substrate effects.
`Film stress was measured using the wafer curvature method.
`Through-thickness dc electrical resistivity was also deter-
`mined.
`III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`A. Appearance
`At a nominal target power of 100 W, deposition under
`conditions described in the previous section resulted in clear
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 18, No. 5, SepÕOct 2000
`
`FIG. 2. Auger electron spectrum of a typical alumina film deposited on Si.
`The Al Auger peak is 51 eV, characteristic of oxidized Al.
`
`alumina films at 5 nm/min on substrates 13 cm from the
`target. Auger electron spectroscopy showed that the alumi-
`num in the films gives an Auger peak at 51 eV, confirming
`that it is in an oxidized state 共Fig. 2兲.
`
`B. Substrate temperature effect
`To examine the effect of substrate temperature on the
`growth of alumina, we deposited three films at the same
`nominal power 共100 W兲, pulsed substrate bias 共⫺300 V兲 and
`with the external solenoid on, but with different substrate
`temperatures, viz., 200, 250, and 300 °C. X-ray diffraction
`共Fig. 3兲 showed that crystalline alumina films can be grown
`at 250 and 300 °C and appear to consist of mixed phases. For
`example, the peak at ⬃25° suggests the presence of ␣alu-
`mina, while the peak at ⬃30° can be due to either ␪or ␬
`phase. Because of stress-induced shifting of diffraction peaks
`and nonrandom texture, we are unable to make specific
`phase identification and composition analysis at this time.
`The reference powder patterns for four typical alumina
`phases are included in this and other x-ray diffraction
`patterns.12 The alumina film grown at 200 °C is amorphous
`关the Si共200兲 forbidden reflection appears because of growth-
`induced stress兴.
`For the film grown at 300 °C, high-resolution TEM im-
`ages were taken at the Si substrate/film interface 共Fig. 4兲, as
`well as regions away from the interface 共Fig. 5兲 with the
`electron beam along the substrate 关110兴 direction. Fringes in
`the aluminum oxide region are indicative of its crystalline
`nature. This is also confirmed by the ring diffraction pattern
`taken from the same region of the film. Figure 6 shows that
`some amorphous regions still exist.
`Crystalline films grown at ⭓250 °C have nanoindentation
`hardness 18–21 GPa, in the same range as crystalline ␣alu-
`
`

`

`2335
`
`Li etal.: Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition
`
`2335
`
`FIG. 3. High-angle x-ray diffraction patterns of aluminum oxide films de-
`posited at 200, 250, and 300 °C 共nominal target power⫽100 W, pulsed
`substrate bias⫽⫺300 V, magnetic field on兲. The Si 共200兲 forbidden reflec-
`tion at 2␪⫽33° appears because of stress.
`
`mina 共sapphire兲. For amorphous films grown at 200 °C, the
`hardness is 12 GPa or less.
`
`C. Substrate bias effect
`In this series of experiments, we kept the nominal target
`power and substrate temperature constant
`共100 W and
`
`FIG. 5. High-resolution TEM image taken at the film region away from the
`film/substrate interface for the film shown in Fig. 3 共substrate temperature
`⫽300 °C兲. Randomly oriented aluminum oxide grains can be seen. The ring
`diffraction pattern in the inset shows a presence of polycrystalline aluminum
`oxide.
`
`300 °C, respectively兲, with the external solenoid on. The sub-
`strate bias was set at ⫺200, ⫺300, and ⫺400 V. Crystalline
`alumina films were obtained at ⫺300 and ⫺400 V substrate
`bias, while films grown at ⫺200 V were amorphous 共Fig. 7兲.
`Alumina films grown at 300 V substrate bias appear to have
`better quality than those at ⫺400 V. The diffraction peaks
`are stronger, and the films are harder 共20.7 vs 17.6 GPa兲.
`AFM indicates 共Fig. 8兲 that films grown at ⫺300 V are
`smoother 关root-mean-square 共rms兲 surface roughness⫽0.36
`nm兴 than those grown at ⫺400 V 共rms surface roughness
`⫽1.78 nm兲.
`Substrate bias has two opposing effects on crystal growth.
`On the one hand, substrate bias increases ion bombardment
`of the growing film, enhancing mobility of surface species.
`This makes it possible to grow crystalline alumina films at
`reduced temperatures. On the other hand, excessive ion bom-
`bardments can create defects at higher rates than can be re-
`paired by enhanced mobility of surface species. Further, ex-
`cessive compressive stress can result. Therefore, some
`optimum bias must be found.
`
`FIG. 4. High-resolution TEM image taken at the interface of Si and alumi-
`num oxide with the electron beam along the Si 关110兴 direction for the film
`shown in Fig. 3 共substrate temperature⫽300 °C兲. Fringes in the aluminum
`oxide region are evident, indicative of crystalline growth.
`
`D. Magnetic field effect and amorphization
`The next series of films were grown at a nominal target
`power of 100 W, substrate bias of ⫺300 V, and substrate
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`

`

`2336
`
`Li etal.: Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition
`
`2336
`
`FIG. 6. High-resolution TEM image taken at the film region away from the
`film/substrate interface for the film shown in Fig. 3 共substrate temperature
`⫽300 °C兲. Both crystalline and amorphous phases are observed.
`
`temperature 300 °C, one set with the solenoid off and one set
`with the solenoid on. Separate measurements under the same
`process conditions showed that the ion-to-neutral arrival ra-
`tio at the substrate is 2.7 with the solenoid off and 5.2 on.13
`
`FIG. 8. AFM images of aluminum films deposited at different substrate bias
`voltages 共nominal target power⫽100 W, substrate temperature⫽300 °C,
`magnetic field on兲. 共a兲 Substrate bias⫽⫺300 V, rms surface roughness
`⫽0.36 nm and 共b兲 Substrate bias⫽⫺400 V, rms surface roughness⫽1.78
`nm.
`
`This approximate doubling of the ion-to-neutral arrival ratio
`has a dramatic effect on film crystallinity. Figure 9 shows
`that without the magnetic field provided by the solenoid,
`there is no crystalline growth.
`Together with the substrate bias, formation of a magnetic
`trap above the substrate surface increases ion bombardment
`of the growing film. As discussed earlier, this can enhance
`crystalline growth under optimum bias conditions. At the
`same time, such ion bombardment results in significantly in-
`creased film stress. For example, films grown with the sole-
`noid on 共Fig. 9兲 have internal compressive stress ⬃5 GPa,
`whereas films grown with the solenoid off have internal
`stress ⬃1 GPa. While thin crystalline alumina films appear
`to be stable 共from electrical resistivity measurements兲, thick
`共⬎100 nm兲 crystalline films grown under these conditions
`experienced partial amorphization 5–7 days after film depo-
`sition 共as shown by the marked decrease of x-ray diffraction
`intensity兲. This occurs even for films stored in a dessicator,
`suggesting that moisture is not a significant factor here.
`
`FIG. 7. High-angle x-ray diffraction patterns of aluminum oxide films de-
`posited at ⫺200, ⫺300, and ⫺400 V substrate bias 共nominal target power
`⫽100 W, substrate temperature⫽300 °C, magnetic field on兲. Crystalline
`phases are obtained at ⫺300 and ⫺400 V.
`
`E. Resistivity
`Through-thickness electrical resistivity of amorphous alu-
`mina films was measured as a function of the applied electric
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 18, No. 5, SepÕOct 2000
`
`

`

`2337
`
`Li etal.: Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition
`
`2337
`
`FIG. 11. Variation of through-thickness electrical resistivity with applied
`electric field for amorphous and crystalline alumina films. The two crystal-
`line films were grown at 100 W nominal target power, ⫺300 V substrate
`bias, 300 °C substrate temperature and with the magnetic field on.
`
`talline兲. The crystalline films were grown at 100 W nominal
`target power, ⫺300 V substrate bias, 300 °C substrate tem-
`perature and with the solenoid on. Except at the lowest elec-
`tric fields, crystalline alumina films generally have higher
`and more stable resistivity than amorphous ones with in-
`creasing electric field. This may be the result of crystalline
`alumina films having lower defect concentrations. These re-
`sults indicate that ultrathin alumina films may be useful for
`low-voltage electrical isolation applications.
`
`IV. CONCLUSIONS
`We demonstrate that stoichiometric alumina thin films
`can be synthesized by reactive magnetron sputtering with
`pulsed dc bias applied to the target and the substrate. Nor-
`mally, amorphous films were produced with hardness ⬍12
`GPa and high electrical resistivity. Under optimum process
`conditions and the formation of a magnetic trap between the
`target and the substrate, crystalline alumina films can be
`grown at substrate temperatures as low as 250 °C. The hard-
`ness is comparable to crystalline ␣alumina. Excellent elec-
`trical properties are maintained down to a thickness of 3 nm.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This work was supported by the MRSEC program of the
`National Science Foundation 共DMR-9632472兲 at the Materi-
`als Research Center of Northwestern University and the IBM
`Storage System Division.
`
`1H. Nakai, J. Shinohara, T. Sassa, and Y. Ikegami, Nucl. Instrum. Methods
`Phys. Res. B 121, 125 共1997兲.
`2H. Wado, T. Shimizu, and M. Ishida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2200 共1995兲.
`3J. F. Moore, D. R. Strongin, P. B. Comita, M. W. Ruckman, and Myron
`Strongin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 368 共1994兲.
`4C. Deshpandey and L. Holland, Thin Solid Films 96, 265 共1982兲.
`5W. D. Sproul, M. E. Graham, M. S. Wong, S. Lopez, D. Li, and R. A.
`Scholl, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 1188 共1995兲.
`6M. S. Wong, W. J. Chia, P. Yashar, J. M. Schneider, W. D. Sproul, and S.
`A. Barnett, Surf. Coat. Technol. 86–87, 381 共1996兲.
`7B. Hirschauer, S. Soderholm, G. Chiaia, and U. O. Karlsson, Thin Solid
`Films 305, 243 共1997兲.
`
`FIG. 9. High-angle x-ray diffraction patterns of aluminum oxide films grown
`with and without the extra magnetic field 共nominal target power⫽100 W,
`substrate bias⫽⫺300 V, substrate temperature⫽300 °C兲. Crystalline alu-
`mina appears only when the field is on.
`
`field, film thickness ranging from 10 to 50 nm 共100 W nomi-
`nal target power, ⫺250 V substrate bias, with the solenoid
`off兲. There was no deliberate substrate heating. The substrate
`temperature was in the range of 100 °C. Figure 10 shows two
`general trends. First, the resistivity decreases with increasing
`film thickness. This is most likely due to the classical size
`effect. Second, the resistivity decreases with increasing elec-
`trical field. We speculate that this may be due to tunneling
`between conducting 共defective兲 regions in the film. The de-
`tailed mechanism is beyond the scope of our investigation.
`Another way to view the data is that all alumina films exhibit
`no through-thickness breakdown and maintain resistivity
`⬎109 ⍀ cm upon application of 10 V.
`Figure 11 shows the resistivity data for three alumina
`films 共10 nm amorphous, 3 nm crystalline, and 10 nm crys-
`
`FIG. 10. Variation of through-thickness electrical resistivity with applied
`electric field for amorphous alumina films 共nominal target power⫽100 W,
`substrate bias⫽⫺250 V, substrate temperature⫽100 °C, magnetic field off兲.
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`

`

`2338
`
`Li etal.: Low-temperature magnetron sputter-deposition
`
`2338
`
`8J. M. Schneider, W. D. Sproul, A. A. Voevodin, and A. Matthews, J. Vac.
`Sci. Technol. A 15, 1 共1997兲.
`9I. Petrov, F. Adibi, J. E. Greene, W. D. Sproul, and W. D. Munz, J. Vac.
`Sci. Technol. A 10, 3283 共1992兲.
`10C. Engstrom, T. Berlind, J. Birch, L. Hultman, I. P. Ivanov, S. R. Kirk-
`patrick, and S. Rohde, Vacuum 56, 107 共2000兲.
`11G. M. Pharr and W. C. Oliver, Mater. Res. Bull. 17, 28 共1992兲.
`12Standard powder x-ray diffraction patterns in Figs. 3, 7, and 9 include
`peaks with intensity ⬎10% of the strongest peak for that phase. Refer-
`ences for ␣, ␪, and ␥alumina are 1997 JCPDS 46-1212, 1997 JCPDS
`
`35-0121, and 1998 JCPDS 47-1308. Reference for ␬alumina is M. Hal-
`varsson, V. Langer, and S. Vuorinen, Powder Diffr. 14, 61 共1999兲.
`13The ion-to-neutral arrival ratio was calculated as follows. The deposition
`rate is 300 nm/h, or 1000 monolayers/h 共assuming 0.3 nm⫽1 monolayer兲.
`Assuming a surface atom density of 1⫻1015 atoms/cm2, this is equivalent
`to an atom arrival rate of 2.78⫻1014 atoms/cm2 s. The substrate ion cur-
`rent density was measured to be 0.12 mA/cm2 with the solenoid off, and
`0.23 mA/cm2 with the solenoid on. Assuming singly charged ions, we
`calculated ion arrival rates of 7.5⫻1014 and 1.44⫻1015 ions/cm2 s respec-
`tively. The corresponding ion-to-neutral arrival rates are then 2.7 and 5.2.
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 18, No. 5, SepÕOct 2000
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket