`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 31
`
`
`
` Entered: January 16, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`IRON DOME LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00439
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE and GREGG I. ANDERSON,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00439
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`On January 15, 2015, a telephone conference was held. The participants
`
`were respective counsel for the parties and Judges Lee and Anderson. Counsel for
`petitioner initiated the call because the extendable deadlines in the Board’s
`Scheduling Order (Paper 17) are approaching the fixed deadlines in the Scheduling
`Order. For instance, the time for Petitioner to file a Reply (Time Period 3) expires
`on January 16, 2015, and Patent Owner has not yet made its witness available for
`cross-examination. At issue is the Declaration of Winston Ninh (Exhibit 2015),
`that is relied on by Patent owner in the Patent Owner Response (Paper 24).
`
`After discussion with the Board, counsel for Patent Owner agreed that unless
`Mr. Winston Ninh is made available for cross-examination by Petitioner by
`January 22, 2015, the declaration of Winston Ninh, relied on by the Patent Owner
`in the Patent Owner’s Response, will not be considered by the Board.
`It is
`ORDERED that if Mr. Winston Ninh is not made available for cross-
`examination by January 22, 2015, then his declaration (Exhibit 2015) will not be
`considered by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00439
`Patent 7,365,871 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Steven Yu
`Holly Y. Li
`ROZMED LLC
`syu@patent-intercept.com
`hyingli@ipadvantages.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Robert C. Curfiss
`David O. Simmons
`bob@curfiss.com
`dsimmons1@sbcglobal.net
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
