`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 4 PagelD #: 6801
`
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`1n Compliance with 35 1151‘. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`on the following
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`For District of Delaware
`
`[1 Trademarks or
`
`,_;
`
`,
`
`3/6/2012
`
`MPatents. ([jth: patcntrae‘tio-n involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DATE FILED
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`For District of Delaware
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`UPMorfio/m W 8/00.
`
`Pi—Net international, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`,
`PLAINTiFF
`
`
`
`
`
`-__
`__
`
`5
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`1n the above~entit1ed ease, the following patentis)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`-—
`—_
`—_
`_—
`
`1n the above—entitled case. the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`[:1 Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[1 Answer
`
`C] Other Pleading
`[1 Cross Bill
`\
`.t
`1
`H t H
`.
`HOLDER ()1‘ PAIENI OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`(fopy 3——-lipon termination of action. mail this copy to Director
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—-Iipon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—(Tase file copy
`
`Ex. 3001
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 6802
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 2 of 4 PagelD #: 6802
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civ. No. 12-282-SLR
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`Pl-NET INTERNATIONAL INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`O R D E R
`
`At Wilmington this 14th day of May 2014, consistent with the memorandum
`
`opinion issued this same date;
`
`IT IS ORDERED that:
`
`. 1. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the patents—in-suit
`
`(D.l. 121) is granted.
`
`2. Defendant’s motion for summaryjudgment of non-infringement (D.|. 113) is
`
`granted.
`
`3. Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Susan Spielman (D.l.
`
`115) is denied.
`
`4. Defendant’s motion for partial summaryjudgment of laches for the ‘500
`
`patent (D.|. 111) is denied as moot.
`
`5. Plaintiff‘s motion to strike defendant’s opening brief in support of its partial
`
`summaryjudgment of laches for the ‘500 patent (D.|. 132) is denied as moot.
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 6803
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 3 of 4 PagelD #: 6803
`
`6. Defendant’s motion to exclude certain testimony of Stevan Porter (D.|. 109) is
`
`denied as moot.
`
`7. Plaintiffs motion to exclude certain testimony by Dr. Michael Siegel (D.l. 117)
`
`is denied as moot.
`
`8. Plaintiffs motion to exclude certain testimony by Dawn Hall (D.l. 119) is
`
`denied as moot.
`
`United StateséDistrict Judge
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 6804
`Case 1:12-cv-00282-SLR Document 168 Filed 05/19/14 Page 4 of 4 PagelD #: 6804
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`PI-NET INTERNATIONAL INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`vvvvvvvvv
`
`Civ. No. 12-282—SLR
`
`JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
`
`For reasons stated in the court’s memorandum opinion and order of May 14, 2014;
`
`IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED thatjudgment be and is hereby entered in favor
`
`of defendant and against plaintiff.
`
`Dated: SIICI ID’Z/DIL/
`
`United Sétes District Judge
`
`(By) Deputy Clerk
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
