`
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________________
`
`
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
`
`and MEDTRONIC COREVALVE, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`TROY R. NORRED, M.D.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`______________________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00395
`
`Patent 6,482,228
`
`______________________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Patent Owner submits this Request for
`
`Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of unpatentability of claims 16
`
`and 19-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,482,228 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. The Board has
`
`already scheduled Oral Hearing for January 27, 2015 (Paper 20). Patent Owner
`
`respectfully requests that the Board provide Patent Owner with 30 minutes in
`
`which to present its arguments in response to Petitioner’s arguments in this
`
`case.1
`
`Patent Owner requests to address the following issues, without waiving
`
`consideration of any issue not listed below:
`
`1. Whether Patent Owner has met his burden of proving he is
`
`entitled to a date of invention prior to U.S. Patent No. 6,458,153 to Bailey
`
`(“Bailey”).
`
`2. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,957,949 to Leonhardt anticipates Claims 16 and 19-24 of the ’228
`
`Patent.
`
`3. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that Bailey
`
`anticipates Claims 16 and 19-24 of the ’228 Patent.
`
`
`1 Patent Owner is requesting, in concurrent filings, an additional 30 minutes of oral
`argument in Case No. IPR2014-00110 and in Case No. IPR2014-00111, for 90
`minutes of oral argument total.
`
`1
`
`
`
`4. Whether Patent Owner has met his burden of proving that
`
`proposed substitute claim 25 is patentable over prior art.
`
`5. Whether Patent Owner has met his burden of proving that
`
`proposed substitute claim 26 is patentable over prior art.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /James J. Kernell/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`James J. Kernell, Reg. No. 42720
`
`ERICKSON KERNELL DERUSSEAU
`
`& KLEYPAS, LLC
`
`8900 State Line Road, Suite 500
`
`Leawood, Kansas 66206
`
`Telephone: (913) 549-4700
`
`Facsimile: (913) 549-4646
`
`Email: jjk@kcpatentlaw.com
`
`
`
`David L. Marcus (pro hac vice)
`
`BARTLE & MARCUS LLC
`
`1100 Main Street, Suite 2730
`
`Kansas City, Missouri 64105
`
`Telephone: (816) 256-4699
`
`Facsimile: (816) 222-0534
`
`Email: dmarcus @bmlawkc.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`Troy Norred, M.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on this 31st day of December 2014, the foregoing
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument has been served electronically
`
`through the Patent Trial and Appeals Board’s Patent Review Processing System
`
`(PRPS) upon the lead and back-up counsel for the Petitioner, JACK BARUFKA
`
`and EVAN FINKEL, both of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/James J. Kernell/
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3