throbber
VOLUME: II
`PAGES: 186-324
`EXHIBITS: None
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`MICRO MOTION, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
` v.
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`
`Case IPR 2014-00178
`
`VIDEOTAPED CONTINUED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY
`VIPPERMAN, Ph.D., called as a witness by and on
`behalf of the Defendant, pursuant to the Texas Rules
`of Civil Procedure, before Michael D. O'Connor,
`Registered Professional Reporter, and Notary Public
`in and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at DLA
`PIPER, LLP (US), 33 Arch Street, Boston,
`Massachusetts, on Tuesday, October 7, 2014,
`commencing at 9:06 a.m.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`186
`
`000001
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. 1076
`Mirco Motion, Inv. v. Invensys Systems, Inc.
`IPR2014-00393
`
`

`
`APPEARANCES:
`
` DLA PIPER, LLP (US)
` By Jeffrey L. Johnson, Esq.
` 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 2800
` Houston, Texas 77002
` (713)425-8445
` jeffrey.johnson@dlapiper.com
` For Invensys Systems, Inc.
`
` FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP
` By Jeffrey N. Costakos, Esq.
` 777 East Wisconsin Avenue
` Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
` (414)297-5782
` jcostakos@foley.com
` For Emerson Electric Company and MicroMotion,
` Inc.
`
` Also Present: Douglas C. Hamilton
`Anthony Piccirilli, Videographer
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`187
`
`000002
`
`

`
` I N D E X
`Deposition of: Direct Cross Redirect Recross
`JEFFREY VIPPERMAN, Ph.D.
`By Mr. Costakos 189
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`188
`
`000003
`
`

`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` JEFFREY VIPPERMAN, Ph.D.
`
`having been previously satisfactorily identified by
`the production of his driver's license, and duly
`sworn by the Notary Public, was examined and
`testified as follows:
`
` VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. The time is
`9:06 a.m. This is the beginning of tape number one
`in the continued deposition of Jeffrey Vipperman.
`We are now on the record.
` CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION
` BY MR. COSTAKOS:
` Q. Dr. Vipperman, since the time that we
`started questioning yesterday morning, have you
`talked with your lawyers about anything?
` A. Small talk.
` Q. Okay. Nothing of substance related to the
`deposition?
` A. Nothing related to this case, other than
`like start time.
` Q. Sure. Of course. Have you talked with
`anyone else about substance relating to the case
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`189
`
`000004
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`since we began questioning yesterday morning?
` A. Not really. I mean, I talked to my wife,
`you know --
` Q. I'm not interested in that. Anyone other
`than that?
` A. No.
` Q. I don't want to know what you said about me
`to your wife.
` Any other discussions with anyone other
`than that sort of thing?
` A. No, I have not.
` Q. So the Romano patent discloses digital
`signal processing, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Well, it discloses a digital drive circuit,
`it discloses discrete 4A transform. So certainly
`elements of it. I don't recall finding that in any
`of my documents.
` Q. How would you define digital signal
`processing?
` A. I'm missing a couple pieces here. Could I
`have the board decision for the '136 and the '854?
` Q. Sure.
` A. While you're at it, could you please pull
`the '854 and the '136 patent. It looks like I don't
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`190
`
`000005
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`have '646 either.
` Q. I'm pretty sure I gave you '646.
` MR. JOHNSON: He did.
` THE WITNESS: Really?
` MR. JOHNSON: Yes. I have it. Here it is
`right here.
` A. I do have the '646 patent.
` Q. Here's the board decision on the '136.
`Here's the board decision on the '854. Here's the
`'854 patent itself. Here's the '136.
` The question I had asked was -- I asked you
`whether Romano discloses digital signal processing,
`and you said you didn't think you had defined that
`term, and my question is what's your definition of
`digital signal processing?
` Is digital signal processing a term that's
`well known in the art?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` Q. Dr. Vipperman, is digital signal processing
`a term that's well known in the art?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. I just need a minute to refresh this report
`that I wrote.
` Q. Will that give you the answer to that
`question, do you think?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`191
`
`000006
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So I do remember a statement on this.
` Q. The question that I have asked you right
`now, and I will withdraw the prior question, is
`digital signal processing a term that is known in
`the art?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Someone who is skilled in the art of
`digital signal processing would know what digital
`signal processing is.
` Q. Okay. You've probably taught classes that
`involved digital signal processing, right?
` A. I have taught classes.
` Q. You've probably used textbooks that use the
`term digital signal processing?
` A. I can't say for sure, but I would say so.
` Q. So what would you as one of ordinary --
`what would one of ordinary skill in the art
`understand the term digital signal processing to
`mean?
` A. Well, it's processing -- digital signal
`processing is processing signals in the digital
`domain.
` Q. Okay. And does Romano disclose digital
`signal processing using that definition that you
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`192
`
`000007
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`just provided?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. It looks like I didn't really define
`digital -- I can't find where I've defined digital
`signal processing. I'm not saying I didn't do it.
`There's a lot of material here.
` So off the -- yes, I would say there are
`elements of digital signal processing in Romano.
` Q. In Romano, the Romano microprocessor would
`continue to make flow rate calculations no matter
`what the flow conditions are, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So this sounds similar to what we left off
`with last night. As I said, I wasn't asked to form
`an opinion on that, and it, you know, requires
`careful analysis. So I'm not comfortable offering
`an opinion right here today.
` Q. So you don't whether Romano would continue
`to determine a value of the flow rate during a
`transition from empty to full?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Well, I mean, you're asking me does Romano
`anticipate the Henry patent, and as I said, I wasn't
`asked to form an opinion.
` Q. So you don't have an opinion on the
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`193
`
`000008
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`question that I just asked you?
` A. I don't; that's correct.
` Q. In the '646 patent -- the '646 patent
`discloses a number of correction factors to account
`for the effects of aeration. You're familiar with
`that generally, right?
` A. I don't understand the question.
` Q. The '646 patent discloses a number of ways
`-- well, strike that.
` In the '646 patent, it discloses some ways
`of correcting the flow measurement to account for
`the effects of aeration, fair?
` A. Not that I recall.
` Q. Does the '646 patent determine the flow
`rate and then correct it to get the actual flow
`rate?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. I don't understand the question.
` Q. What don't you understand about that?
` A. You said does it compute the apparent flow
`rate and then correct that flow rate?
` Q. To get the actual flow rate. That was my
`question, yes.
` A. I mean, we discussed yesterday the '646 has
`a lot of sophisticated signal processing that allows
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`194
`
`000009
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`it to operate even in the midst of two-phase flow.
` Q. Was that the end of your answer?
` A. It was.
` Q. So does the '646 patent disclose
`determining the apparent flow rate and then
`correcting it to get the actual flow rate?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. I mean, is there a section in my report you
`can point me to?
` Q. I'm just asking you a question about the
`Romano patent.
` A. Not that I can say. I don't know.
` Q. Okay. If you look at Column 48 of the '646
`patent. Are you there?
` A. I am.
` Q. So if you look at Line 32, beginning at
`Line 32, Column 48, it says, "In one implementation,
`the controller uses three corrections to account for
`the effects of aeration: Bubble effect correction,
`damping effect correction and sensor imbalance
`correction."
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. So does that refresh your recollection that
`the '646 patent discloses determining apparent flow
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`195
`
`000010
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`rate and then correcting it to get the actual flow
`rate?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. It refreshes my recollection that it makes
`these corrections.
` Q. And what's the purpose of making those
`corrections?
` A. To improve the flow rate calculation.
` Q. So when the '646 patent measures the actual
`flow rate, using your terminology --
` A. I did not say it measures. That was your
`terminology. I just said it makes corrections to
`greatly improve the flow rate.
` Q. I'm using the word "measure the actual flow
`rate" out of your report.
` A. Okay. I asked you if you could point me to
`a section in my report, and you didn't respond. I
`said I'm happy to comment on a section of my report.
` Q. Well, you said that the term "determine the
`flow rate" means measure the actual flow rate,
`right?
` A. Well, we had a discussion about does
`"determine" mean measure.
` Q. You said in Paragraph 21 of your report,
`"For the '646 patent 'determine (determining)...
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`196
`
`000011
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the flow rate' means 'measure (measuring) the actual
`flow rate of liquid'. This is the plain and
`ordinary meaning."
` A. Okay.
` Q. So in the '646 patent, when it determines
`or measures the actual flow rate, it does so by
`determining the apparent flow rate, and then
`correcting it to get the actual flow rate, right?
` A. Well, those are some of many steps to
`measuring the flow rate, as I think you know, but
`applying these corrections are part of it.
` Q. So part of the process of measuring the
`actual flow rate in the '646 patent is determining
`the apparent flow rate, and then correcting to get
`the actual flow rate?
` A. Well, I mean, what I'm saying here is in
`the end you get the actual flow rate.
` Q. And part of the way you do that is by
`determining the actual flow rate, and then applying
`a correction factor, right?
` A. I didn't talk about apparent flow rate.
` Q. That's not my question. My question is, in
`the '646 patent, part of the way you determine the
`actual flow rate is to determine an apparent flow
`rate, and then apply correction factors?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`197
`
`000012
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. I didn't discuss apparent flow rates at
`all.
` Q. Right, but you did say that "determine the
`flow rate" means measure the actual flow rate. So
`I'm asking you questions about how the '646 patent
`determines or measures the actual flow rate.
` So in the '646 patent, the way it measures
`the actual flow rate is to determine an apparent
`flow rate, and then to apply correction factors, at
`least as part of the process, right?
` A. So the '646, you know, we have a Coriolis
`mass flowmeter, vibrating tubes, pick-off sensors,
`we do signal processing, and we apply corrections as
`part of that, and that's how we get the actual flow
`rate.
` Q. Now, if you turn to Column 53 -- excuse me,
`that's not the right place. If you turn to Column
`56 of the '646 patent, do you see in the preceding
`column, Column 55, there is a Section N that's
`entitled "Batching From Empty"?
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Over in Column 56 it discusses testing
`that's shown in Figures 47A through 47C.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`198
`
`000013
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Do you see that?
` A. Okay, yes.
` Q. And then it says, beginning at Line 43, "Of
`course there are still erroneous data in this
`interval. For example, flow generating a phase
`difference in excess of about five degrees is
`physically not possible. However, from the
`perspective of a self-validating" meter, "such as is
`discussed above, this phase measurement still
`constitutes raw data that may be corrected. In some
`implementations, a higher level validation process
`may identify the data from .4 to 1 seconds as
`unrepresentative of the true process value (based on
`the gain, amplitude and other parameters) and may
`generate a dazzled mass flow to suppress extreme
`measured values."
` Do you see that?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. So even in the '646 process, there will
`still be erroneous data during the transition from
`substantially empty to substantially full; that's
`what this passage recognizes, right?
` A. I recall discussing this yesterday, that no
`measurement system is perfectly accurate. So, yes,
`there's some error.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`199
`
`000014
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` In the preceding paragraph, it also talks
`about how analog control systems stall and are
`unable to provide measurement data until drive gain
`returns to near normal.
` Q. So this passage, though, recognizes that
`during the transition from substantially empty to
`substantially full, there will be erroneous,
`physically impossible data, that is detected by the
`'646 flowmeter, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Well, it says "Flow generating a phase
`difference in excess of about five degrees is
`physically not possible. However, from the
`perspective of a self-validating sensor, such as
`discussed above, the phase measurement still
`constitutes raw data that may be corrected."
` So it sounds to me he's talking about the
`physically not possible data before it's corrected.
` Q. Right. So it's detecting data that is
`physically not possible, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So this stage of the output process, which
`constitutes raw data that may be corrected, has
`error that's physically not possible.
` Q. Right. So the data that is detected by the
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`200
`
`000015
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`flowmeter is erroneous data that's physically not
`possible, correct?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So at the stage that Figure 47 represent,
`which represent raw data which may be corrected,
`they contain error that's physically not possible.
` Q. And it also discloses there that the
`process may identify the data as unrepresentative
`and generate a dazzled mass flow to suppress extreme
`measurement values, right?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. So if it determined the data is
`unrepresentative, it may output the message dazzled
`as opposed to the mass flow rate during that
`interval, correct?
` A. I see where it says that in Column 56,
`namely at Line 53, but I didn't form any opinions
`regarding the self-validating meter.
` Q. Let's talk about the slug flow inhibit
`board, which I think is in front of you.
` The slug flow inhibit board was
`specifically designed for use in applications that
`are susceptible to slug flows or during unloading or
`loading, right?
` A. Correct.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`201
`
`000016
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. And the slug flow inhibit board was meant
`to replace the signal board that was used in the
`Model D product, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` Q. If you look at Page 2 of the document --
` A. Sure.
` Q. -- the first paragraph it said, "This
`board is designed to replace the Remote Electronics
`Unit standard signal board."
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. So the slug flow inhibit board was meant to
`replace the signal board in the Model D product,
`right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So the slug flow inhibit board is a circuit
`board that replaces the Model D signal board.
` Q. That's what I just said, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. What the slug flow inhibit board
`does is to detect when there's a slug flow type
`condition, and then to inhibit the output of flow
`pulses, right?
` A. Correct. So it can't determine flow rate
`during that period.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`202
`
`000017
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Well, it inhibits the output of flow
`pulses, correct?
` A. The slug flow inhibits the output of flow
`pulses and can't determine flow rate. But it does
`say that in the slug flow manual that the board
`inhibits output of flow pulses.
` Q. Right. So in paragraph -- the first
`paragraph under "Principle of Operation," it says
`that "The slug flow inhibit board monitors the
`density of the fluid," and that, "If the density
`falls outside of normal operating range, the board
`will inhibit the output of flow pulses," correct?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. And you agree that's what it does, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. I agree that it inhibits flow pulses and
`can't determine flow rate.
` Q. Well, it doesn't say can't determine flow
`rate, does it; that's just your conclusion?
` A. I see that it doesn't say that in the slug
`flow manual.
` Q. That's right. In the slug flow inhibit
`board once, as you see on page, I guess, three of
`the document -- the page confusingly has Page 2 on
`the lower right-hand corner but a 3 in the middle.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`203
`
`000018
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Okay.
` Q. Under numeral five in the middle of the
`page it says that once the flowmeter begins counting
`in a normal manner, the downstream valve will be
`opened.
` Do you see that?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` Q. I should say it the other way. What it
`says is, once the flowmeter begins counting in a
`normal manner, the operator should open the
`downstream valve, correct?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Right. So this section of the slug flow
`manual is really getting at the fact that the Model
`D can't handle two-phase flow, in particular,
`batching applications like this. So it gives
`suggestions for how to mount the flowmeters.
` And then the next sections are basically on
`how to -- how to fill up the flowmeter so it starts
`in a full condition to try to minimize the effects
`of the transition from empty to full. So it just
`starts full.
` Q. The notion here is that the Model D
`produced erroneous measurements during batching,
`right?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`204
`
`000019
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Well, I mean again, I didn't form an
`opinion on whether the Model D alone anticipates --
` Q. That wasn't the question I asked you.
` A. It is, essentially, the question you asked
`me.
` Q. You said just a few seconds ago that the
`Model D couldn't handle batching. So my question to
`you is, the problem is, the Model D was producing
`erroneous measurements during batching, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` Q. Are you able to answer that question or
`not?
` A. Well, it says in some -- from the slug flow
`supplement in Section 2, the second paragraph --
`scratch that.
` Q. Actually, the part you pointed to is a
`pretty good indication, isn't it?
` So it says there, "In some instances, when
`the flowmeter is filled with fluid from an initially
`empty state, the vibrating U-tubes may become
`unbalanced causing the flow rate indication to jump
`excessively high," right?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. Okay. And then it says, "If the signal
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`205
`
`000020
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`voltage exceeds 3.5 volts, the board will inhibit
`the output of flow pulses," right?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. Okay. So the problem that the slug flow
`inhibit board was attempting to correct was that in
`the Model D, in some instances, when the flowmeter
`is filled with fluid from an initial state, the
`vibrating U-tubes may become unbalanced, causing the
`flow rate indication to jump excessively high,
`right?
` A. I see where it says that in the manual.
` Q. And that's -- you understand that that's
`what the slug flow inhibit board was attempting to
`deal with, right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So the slug flow inhibit board will,
`instead of outputting the erroneous data or making
`the erroneous calculation, will inhibit the output
`of flow pulses, right?
` A. When the voltage goes -- right. Right, so
`"If the signal out voltage exceeds 3.5 volts, the
`board will inhibit the outflow of flow pulses."
` So then basically no flow rate is being
`determined.
` Q. Well, at least no flow pulses are being
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`206
`
`000021
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`outputted, right?
` A. "Inhibiting output of flow pulses means no
`flow rate is determined."
` Q. That is what you say in your report. But
`you just conceded a few moments ago that it doesn't
`say -- strike that.
` What it says in the slug flow inhibit board
`supplement is that it inhibits the output of flow
`pulses, right? That's what it says, correct?
` A. Well, if you look --
` Q. I'm just asking about the slug flow
`supplement.
` A. The slug flow supplement says "If the
`voltage exceeds 3.5 volts, the board will inhibit
`the output of flow pulses." That's what I'm -- I'm
`reading that as a quote. Then if there are no flow
`pulses, no flow rate is determined.
` Q. It doesn't say that last part; that's your
`conclusion?
` A. The last sentence is mine, correct.
` Q. And if the signal out voltage exceeds 3.5
`volts, that indicates that the flow tube oscillation
`is damped?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` Q. Let me ask it this way. What would cause
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`207
`
`000022
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the signal out voltage to exceed 3.5 volts, do you
`know?
` A. I can read you what the slug flow inhibit
`manual says.
` Q. Does it say something about what causes the
`voltage to go up?
` A. Well, we read that section earlier.
` Q. The previous sentence or two sentences
`above that says, "In some instances," et cetera, et
`cetera?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So can you please repeat the question?
` Q. I'll withdraw the question.
` Let's turn to Page 3 of the slug flow board
`supplement. So do you see there's a Section 3.2.1
`at the bottom of the page --
` A. I do.
` Q. -- that refers to calculating a
`loading/unloading correction factor?
` A. I see that.
` Q. So what this is meant to do is in batching
`applications to apply a correction factor to get
`something that's closer to the actual amount that's
`batched, correct?
` A. Okay, yeah, we have to look a little above,
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`208
`
`000023
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`I think. The last paragraph in the previous
`section, it says "the slug flow inhibit board will
`prevent a portion of the fluid flow from being
`counted during loading/unloading," meaning that we
`don't have a flow rate.
` "The amount of fluid not counted will
`depend upon the piping arrangement, the meter
`location, the fluid properties, the flow rate and
`the purging method. However, if the start-up and
`purge operation are always performed in the same
`manner, the amount of fluid not measured by the
`flowmeter can be characterized."
` Q. And then it sets forth a means for
`correcting to account for whatever fluid is not
`counted during the transition from empty to full,
`right?
` A. Well, I think it refers back to the
`five-step process that we were discussing previously
`from Section 3.1, where you can't start these meters
`empty.
` So you have to prefill them, because they
`can't handle the transition from empty to full. So
`you prefill them, and this is a way of figuring out
`the error due to that prefilling.
` Q. That's your testimony?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`209
`
`000024
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` MR. COSTAKOS: I will withdraw the
`question.
` Q. So is this correction factor meant to
`correct for the time during the filling of the
`meter; in other words, during the transition from
`empty to full?
` A. Well, you know, I wasn't asked to form an
`opinion on this specific part, but it seems to be a
`correction for the fact that it can't handle the
`transition from empty to full. So you have to start
`at full as described above, so that you have
`single-phase flow.
` Q. So it says in the paragraph right above
`Figure 2, that "the slug flow inhibit board will
`prevent a portion of the fluid flow from being
`counted during unloading/loading," right?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. So a portion of the fluid flow -- strike
`that.
` So that means that some portion of the
`fluid flow will be counted during loading and
`unloading, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. So for the time when the slug flow inhibit
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`210
`
`000025
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`board is not operating, it's counting fluid flow,
`and there's a flow rate calculation.
` For the time where the slug flow inhibit
`board is operating, then it's inhibiting pulses that
`were not counting fluid flow, because there's no
`flow rate. That's what this sentence says to me.
` Q. So in the procedure that's right above that
`paragraph, that five-step procedure, is a way of
`minimizing the amount of fluid that's missed during
`start-up, right?
` A. So since we can't transition from empty to
`full, we have to fill it up, and this is
`compensating for that amount of fluid that it took
`to fill up the flowmeter.
` Q. Well, but the flowmeter is going to be
`measuring while you're filling up the meter, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. It looks like probably not, because it
`says, "Just as with slug flow, the slug flow inhibit
`board will prevent a portion of the fluid flow from
`being counted during loading/unloading."
` Q. Right, a portion. So a portion of the
`fluid flow will be counted during loading and
`unloading, right?
` A. So when slug flow is not operating, then
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`211
`
`000026
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the flowmeter does produce a flow rate, and the
`fluid flow is counted when slug flow is active
`during flow pulses. So it's not counted when
`there's no flow rate.
` Q. So if you look at the entire transition
`that's contemplated here, at the beginning the
`flowmeter is going to be empty, right?
` A. I see where it says that in the slug flow
`manual.
` Q. Okay. And so when the flowmeter is empty,
`the flowmeter will be able to measure flow rate,
`right? It will be vibrating normally, because it's
`single phase?
` A. It's single-phase gas, so it should be able
`to measure that.
` Q. At some point a fluid will start flowing
`through the conduit in the flowmeter, right?
` A. Ostensibly. We have that described below
`what we were talking about.
` Q. Right. The whole point of a flowmeter is
`for fluid to flow through it, right? I'm really
`trying to, I think, ask an easy question.
` In batching, it's empty, and at some point
`fluid starts to flow through, right?
` A. Yes.
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`212
`
`000027
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Okay. And at some point during that
`process, the slug flow inhibit board will determine
`that the fluid density falls out of normal operating
`range or that the signal out voltage exceeds that
`preset limit, right?
` MR. JOHNSON: Objection, form.
` A. Well, there will be a transition from empty
`to full. The one described in the five-step process
`is a prefilling application to start the meter full.
` Q. That wasn't the question I asked you,
`though.
` In the slug -- with the slug flow inhibit
`board, what will happen is that at some point during
`the transition from empty to full, the slug flow
`inhibit board will kick in; is that fair?
` A. If you try to do a batching application
`with the Model D, which isn't described in the
`manual, because it's known that it can't handle
`two-phase flow, if you have the slug flow inhibit
`board, when that voltage exceeds 3.5 volts, it
`inhibits the flow pulses, so there's no flow rate
`calculated.
` Q. And that will happen at some point during
`the transition from substantially empty to
`substantially full, right?
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`213
`
`000028
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. So, presumably.
` Q. It won't happen instantaneously?
` A. It doesn't say.
` Q. And in fact, this five-step process is a
`way of attempting to minimize the amount of fluid
`that's missed on start-up?
` A. Well, the five-step process is about -- in
`Step 4, "Slowly open the upstream valve to force the
`air out and slowly fill the flowmeter. This slow
`opening minimizes the shock to the meter and reduces
`the recovery time."
` So it's indication that the meter is not
`going to handle the transition from empty to full.
`So ostensibly the slug flow would kick in, inhibit
`the flow pulses and there would be no flow rate.
` Q. This five-step process is a way of trying
`to reduce the amount of time in which the slug flow
`inhibit board will be operating; isn't that right?
` A. It just says a start-up technique that has
`worked well for loading and unloading applications
`as described below.
` Q. It does say it has techniques here, like on
`No. 3, it has a technique of opening "the downstream
`valve to allow one quarter or less of the normal
`fluid flow. This will minimize the amount of fluid
`
`SOUND DEPOSITION SERVICES, INC.
`(888) 297-6863
`
`214
`
`000029
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`missed on start-up," right?
` A. I see where it says that.
` Q. Okay. So that is meant to reduce the
`amount of time during which the slug flow inhibit
`board will be inhibiting the output of flow pulses?
` A. Well, it will -- it says it minimizes the
`amount of liquid missed on start-up. It doesn't say
`anything about time.
` Q. Okay. It's meant to re

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket