throbber
HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY .
`i
`University of Wisconsin
`1305 Uilden Dr.. Madison, Wi::>. 53706
`
`... · ...... "'_~~.l.:::,:'"~.' .... ;.~.~.-~..
`
`•
`
`.
`
`American
`. Journal of
`Roentgenology
`
`September 1983
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 1
`
`

`

`601
`
`A New Percutaneous Vena
`Cava Filter
`
`A new, percutaneous vena cava filter was developed and tested in 11 dogs. Nitinol
`wire (0.045 cm diam) spitals were straightened and passed through an 8 French Teflon
`catheter into the inferior vena cava. The filter resumed its original spiral shape on
`warming to body temperature and was left in place up to 6 weeks. Long-term patency
`and capture of injected radiopaque clots were demonstrated. This new filter design
`may be a simple alternative to currently used implants.
`
`Pulmonary thromboembolism has been treated surgically by both ligation (1]
`and plication [2, 3] of the inferior vena cava. During the last 10 years, transven(cid:173)
`ously placed caval filters [4,5] and'occluding balloons [6] have been developed.
`While most of these techniques are effective in trapping emboli, a surgical
`cutdown of a peripheral vein is required and long-term patency is inconsistent
`[7]. These drawbacks have prompted recent investigators to search for a more
`easily placed and effective vena cava filter [8, 9].
`Recently, 8im.on arid associates (8, 10] developed a filter using nitinol wjre.
`Nitinol, a unique alloy with a heat-dependent memory, can be passed as a
`straight wire through relatively small angiographic catheters. When extruded and
`warmed to body temperature, the wire resumes its original complex shape.
`We recently developed a new technique for the nonsurgical placement of
`arterial endoprostheses using nitinol helices [11]. We believed that this same
`basic shape could be modified to act as an effective percutaneous caval filter.
`The design is' simpler than those previously reported and may be less thrombo(cid:173)
`genic since less wire is introduced into the vena cava. Its method of introduction,
`ability to capture emboli, and long-term patency are the subject of this report.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Filter Desi!J;,
`
`. The characteristics of nitinol wire have been described in detail [8, 11). Briefly, nitinol is
`a nickle-titanium alloy with·a heat-sensitive memory. If the wire is given a certain shape and
`annealed at greater than 500°C, it will memorize that shape. On cooling in ice water, the
`wire becomes soft and can be straightened without destroying its memory. When the wire
`is heated to its transition temperature (about 30°C for the alloy used in this study), it rapidly
`resumes its original shape, becoming more rigid than stainless steel.
`Vena cava filters were made by wrapping nitinol wire (0.045 cm diam) on a specially
`designed steel mandrel (fig. 1 A). The cone-shaped mandrel was threaded so that the
`distance between the threads was 2.75 mm. In this fashion, a helical spiral was produced
`with constant openings of 2.75 mm between each turn of the wire (fig. 1B). At the apex of
`the spiral, the wire was drawn out to form a large stabilizing loop that kept the cone of the
`filter centered in the middle of the caval lumen. The first filter in the study embolized to the
`lung within 2 weeks of placement. In all other filters, therefore, a small, 2 mm hook was
`made at the end of the stabijizifig ring, which penetrated the caval wall and securely
`
`L
`i'
`II ~, ;
`
`'I
`I
`.1
`
`Andrew Cragg 1
`Gunnar Lund
`Erich Salomonowitz
`Joseph Rysavy
`Flavio Castaneda
`Wilfrido Castaneda-Zuniga
`Kurt Amplatz
`
`Received Aprif 13, 1983; accepted May 13,
`1983.
`1 .AII authors: Department of Radiology, UnIver(cid:173)
`sity of Minnesota Hospitals, Box 701 Mayo, 428
`Delaware St. S.E., Mi[1neapolis, MN 55455. Ad(cid:173)
`dress reprint requests to A. Cragg.
`AJR 141:601-604, September 1983
`0361-803X/83/1413-0601
`© American Roentgen Ray Society
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 2
`
`

`

`'I I
`
`602
`
`"
`
`I
`
`i
`I;
`
`CRAGG ET Al.
`
`\.
`
`.)
`
`"
`
`AJR: 141, September 1983
`
`Fig. i.-A, Stainless steel filter man(cid:173)
`drel. Nitlnol wire is wrapped on mandrel
`and annealed in BunseQ burner flame.
`Open area of filter can be, varied by
`changing tightnel>s of spiral. B, Nitinol
`spiral filter. Delivery wire is screwed to
`adapting plug (closed arrow) and filter is
`drawn into catheter. When extruded in
`body, filter resumes its shape. Stabiliz(cid:173)
`ing ring (open arrow) centers filter cone
`in lumen of vena cava. C, Filter viewed
`from below. Spiral design provides ef(cid:173)
`fective sieve without restricting blood
`flow. Anchoring hook (arrow) extendl> 2
`mm from stabilizing ring.
`
`,. ,. r
`
`"
`
`A
`
`c
`
`anchored the filter (fig. 1 C).
`Most investigators have stated that nitinol wire should be an(cid:173)
`nealed at 525°C for 20-30 min [8]. We found that equally good
`resu'its are obtained by heating the mandrel and wire in the flame of
`a Bunsen burner until the wire changes from its unannealed straw
`color to a deep blue. This process Is simpler and can be accom-
`plished in less than 5 min.
`. \
`After annealing, the mandrel is allowed to cool and the wire is
`removed in ice water. Usually, an "oversized" filter is constructed
`by winding extra turns of the wire on the mandrel. In this way the
`filter could be fitted exactly to a given vena cava size by trimming
`one or more of the spiral turns, thus decreasing the overall ~iameter
`of the filter.
`!
`
`Animal Studies
`
`Eleven adult mongrel dogs (15-30 kg) were anesthetized with
`intravenous sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) and maintained on
`spontaneous respiration. An 8 French introducing sheath was
`placed percutaneou?ly in a femoral vein and connected to a hepa(cid:173)
`rinized (2 U/ml) saline solution. An inferior vena cavogram was
`obtained by injecting 15 ml of 60% diatrizoate contrast medium at
`10 mil sec through the sheath.
`The diameter of the infrarenal part of the vena cava was measured
`and the filter trimmed accordingly. An adapting plug [11] was
`attached to the trailing wire of the filter, and a delivery wire was
`screwed to the filter. The filter was then immersed in sterile iced
`saline and drawn into a 60-cm. 8-French Teflon catheter. When
`fully straightened, the filter was about 20 cm long.
`The catheter with the loaded nitinol wire was Inserted through
`the introducer and passed under .fluoroscopic control to the desired
`level in the inferior, vena cava. The filter was deposited in the vena
`cava by withdrawing the catheter over the adapting wire. As the
`
`straightened nitinol wire came into contact with the blood it rapidly
`resumed its original filter shape. Once extruded, the filter was pulled
`down to the desired level and then quickly advanced by pushing on
`the delivery wire, This caused the hook on the filter to engage the
`wall of the cava thus anchoring the filter. A venogram was obtained
`immediately after extrusion of the filter to document its position and
`anchoring. If the position of the filter was not optimal, It could be
`withdrawn into the catheter and positioned again. To release the
`filter, the delivery wire was unscrewed and withdrawn together with
`the catheter from the vena cava.
`The ability of the fiiter to capture emboli was tested in five animals
`acutely and in one chronic animal at the time of sacrifice. Emboli
`were prepared by drawing fresh blood into a thin-walled polyethyl(cid:173)
`ene catheter (3 mm diam, 10 cm long). A 'small amol!nt of tantalum
`powder was added to the blood for opacific<:ition. After 10 min, the
`clot was injected into a femoral vein. This was monitored fluoro(cid:173)
`scopically and plain films of the abdomen and ches~ were made to
`document the effectiveness of the filter.
`Long-term patency studies were performed in six animals. Ven(cid:173)
`ograms were repeated at 2 weeks and again at 6 weeks before
`sacrifice (fig. 2). The animals were killed by an ove~dose of pento(cid:173)
`barbital, and the abdomens were opened and examined for evi(cid:173)
`dence of retroperitoneal bleeding. The venae cavaerwere isqlated
`and the filters examined for evidence of thrombosis.
`None of the animals received long-term anticoagulation.
`
`Results
`
`Filters were placed successfully, in all animals. (n two
`animals, the original placement of the filters was not optimal.
`These filters were withdrawn into the catheter and success(cid:173)
`fully repositioned.
`Venograms performed
`
`immediately after ,Placement
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 3
`
`

`

`AJR:141, September 1983
`
`NEW VENA CAVA FILTER
`
`603
`
`Fig. 2.-A, Vena cavogram 6 weeks
`after percutaneous placement of nltlnol
`spiral filter. Vena cava is widely patent
`and anchoring hook has penetrated wall
`(arrow). At autopsy, hook was com(cid:173)
`pletely covered by mound of fibrous tis(cid:173)
`sue. B, Same filter after injection of ra(cid:173)
`diopaque autologous clot. Clot (3 mm
`x Hl em) (arrow) was completely cap(cid:173)
`tured by filter.
`
`A
`
`B
`
`showed patent filters in all cases without evidence of throm(cid:173)
`bosis. Of the six chronic animals, four had widely patent
`filters at 2'and 6 weeks (fig. 2A). In one animal, the lumen
`was 60% stenosed at 2 weeks and occluded at 6 weeks.
`This filter: was the only one placed with the cone pointing
`down instead of up. The unanchored filter that embolized to
`the lung was found lodged in the left pulmonary artery at 6
`weeks. The pulmonary artery was still widely patent and the
`filter was free of thrombus.
`The capture of 3 mm x 10 cm autologous clots was
`complete in all six filters studied (fig 28). In several In(cid:173)
`stances, the clot fragmented into several smaller pieces on
`extrusion from the catheter; however, even small 1-2 cm
`emboli appeared to be captured by the filter. Opacified clot
`could not be found on postembolization chest radiographs.
`It is possible that very small fragments passed through .the
`filter and were not detected on the chest film.
`On postmortem examination, the anchoring hook pro(cid:173)
`truded through the wall of the vena cava 1-3 mm and was
`covered by a small mound of fibrous tissue. No pericaval
`bleeding was noted. The largest rings of the filter were
`incorporated into the wall of the vena cava by 6 weeks. In
`most cases, small fibrous bands extended between the
`spirals of the filter. (
`
`Discussion
`Surgical interruption of the vena cava in patients prone to
`pulmonary thromboembolism largely has been supers~ded
`
`by transvenous mechanical vena cava filters. The main
`disadvantage of these filters is the need for a surgical
`cutdown in a usually very sick patient. A percutaneous
`introduction technique of standard filters has been de(cid:173)
`scribed, but because of the large size of the delivery cap(cid:173)
`sule, this technique has not gained 'popularity (12, 13]. The
`development of an effective percutaneous filter therefore
`would be a great improvement over present techniques.
`T~e' nitinol spiral filter developed in our laboratory pos(cid:173)
`sesses several advantages over other vena cava filters: (1)
`It can be introduced percutaneously using an 8 french
`catheter; (2) the filter is easily trimmed to be adapted to
`different· vena cava sizes; (3) it can be withdrawn and
`repositioned easily; (4) proper orientation'of the filter cone
`is maintained by a stabilizing loop; and (5) the open area of
`the filter can be adjusted by winding a tighter or looser spiral
`on the mandrel.
`The disadvantage of the present design is the mode of
`fixation. While one anchoring hook was adequate for normal
`animals, we believe that a more secure system of fixation
`needs to be developed before human trials can be consid(cid:173)
`ered.
`While only a small number of long-term filters was tested,
`the thrombogenicity and biocompatibifity of the filter seem
`comparable to those in present use [14]. In vivo thrombo(cid:173)
`genicity studies have not been performed on the nitinol filter
`developed by Palestrant et at. [10]; therefore, we cannot
`compare the relative thrombogenicity of the two filter de-
`
`-',1
`
`"
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 4
`
`

`

`604
`
`CRAGG ET AL . .
`
`AJR: 141 , September 1983
`
`signs. Undoubtedly, however, the most important factor in
`determinit:lg thrombogenicity of a venous prosthesis is the
`degree to which it obstructs blood flow. Thus an inverse
`relation exists between thrombogenicity and the open area
`of the filter. The more wire, the better the filter action but
`the greater the tendency to thrombose. In humans, long(cid:173)
`term anticoagulation may favorably influence this balance.
`We believe that the spiral filter shape used in this study may
`provide the most effective sieve with the least amount of
`wire, thereby decreasing thrombogenic'ity.
`It is interesting to note that the thrombosed filter was the
`only one oriented with the apex of the cone down. It is
`possible that the orientation of a filter affects its thrombo(cid:173)
`genicity. Greenfield et al. [15] claim that the optimal orienta(cid:173)
`tion of a cone-shaped filter is with its apex directed upward.
`It is claimed that with this orientation a, large embolus
`occludes less of the lumen and has a self-anchoring effect
`by distending the filter against the caval wall. For this
`reason, we chose to orient our filter with the apex directed
`upward.
`In summary, an effective vena cava filter has been devel(cid:173)
`oped, which overcomes many of the disadvantages of cur(cid:173)
`rently used filters. The filter is introduced percutaneously
`through a small catheter and effectively stops propagated
`emboli. With the development of a more effective anchoring
`system, the design may be tested in humans.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. O'Neill EE. Ligation of the inferior vena cava in the prevention
`and
`treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med
`1945;232: 641-646
`2. DeWeese MD, Hunter DC. A vena caval filter for the prevention
`of pulmonary emboli. Bull Soc tnt Chir 1958;17: 117 -125
`3. Adams JT, DeWeese JA. Experimental and clinical evaluation
`
`c
`.'
`of partial vein interruption in the prevention of pulmonary
`emboli. Surgery 1965;57: 82-1 02
`:
`4. Mabin-Uddin K, McLean R, Jude JR. A new catheter technique
`of interruption of inferjor vena cava for prevention of pulmonary
`embolism. Am Surg 1969;35:889-894
`5. Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR. Brown pp'. Elkins RC. A new
`intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of
`emboli. Surgery 1973;73: 599-606
`6. Hunter JA. Dye WS, Javid H, Najafi H. Goldin MD, Serry C.
`P.ermanent transvenous balloon occlusion of the inferior vena
`cava. Ann Surg 1977;186:491-499
`7. Cimochowski GE, Evans RH, Zarins CK, Lu C, DeMeester MD.
`Greenfield filter versus Mobin-Uddin umbrella.· J. Thorac Car(cid:173)
`diovasc Surg 1980;79: 358-365
`8. Simon M. Kaplow R, Salzman E, Freiman D. A vena cava filter
`using thermal shape memory alloy: experimental aspects. Ra(cid:173)
`diology 1977;125~89-94
`9. Gianturco C, Anderson ~H. Wallace S. A new vena cava filter:
`experimental animal evaluation. Radiology 1980; 137: 835-
`837
`10. Palestrant AM. P~ince M, Simon M. Comparative in viiro eval(cid:173)
`uation of the nitinol inferior vena cava filter. Radiology
`1982;145:351-355
`.
`11 .. Cragg A, Lund G, Rysavy J, Castaneda F. Castaneda-Zuniga
`W, Amplatz K. Nonsurgical placement of arterial endo(cid:173)
`prostheses: a new technique using nitinol wire. Radiology
`1983;147: 261-263
`12. Rizk GH, Amplatz K. A percutaneous method of introducing
`the caval umbrella. AJR 1973;117: 903-909
`13. Formanek A, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Knight L, Amplatz K. Three
`years experience with percutaneous introduction of the inferior
`vena cava filter. Rev tnteram Radiot1977;2: 171-175
`14. Edie JW. Andreasen GF, Zaytoun MP. Surface corrosion of
`nilinol and stainless steel under clinical conditions. Angle Or(cid:173)
`thodontist 1981;51 :319-324
`15. Greenfield LJ. Payton MD, Brown PP, Elkins RC. Transvenous
`management of pulmonary embolic disease. Ann Surg
`1978;180:461-468
`
`. .-'
`
`/
`
`I
`!
`
`~I
`
`I,
`
`.,
`~ i
`
`ill
`
`I
`
`;:
`
`1:1
`;:1
`;'1
`I:.
`I .,
`" ii I!
`Ii
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 5
`
`

`

`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 6
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1005, p. 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket