throbber
Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`PETITIONER EDWARDS’ EXHIBIT NO. 1002
`
`DECLARATION OF MING H. WU, Ph.D.
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.68, 42.63, AND 42.65
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 1
`
`II. MATERIALS REVIEWED ................................................................. 2
`
`III. QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................. 2
`
`IV. DISCUSSION OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS AND NITINOL .... 6
`
`V.
`
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART ............................. 27
`
`VI.
`
`THE JERVIS ’141 PATENT .............................................................. 29
`
`VII. PRIOR ART TO THE ’141 PATENT ................................................ 36
`
`VIII. SUMMARY OF OPINIONS .............................................................. 69
`
`i
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`I. BACKGROUND
`
`1.
`
`I am over the age of 18 and a citizen of United States of America. My
`
`permanent residence is 1462 Voyager Drive, Tustin, California.
`
`2.
`
`I have been asked by the law firm of Meunier Carlin & Curfman,
`
`LLC, on behalf of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (“Edwards”), to provide my
`
`technical analysis and opinions regarding prior art references and technology
`
`relevant to U.S. Patent No. 6,306,141 to Jervis (“the ’141 Patent”).
`
`3.
`
`More specifically, I have been asked to explain the physical and
`
`inherent properties of shape memory alloys (SMAs), including Nitinol, and to
`
`describe the state of technology with regard to Nitinol in the late 1970’s and early
`
`1980’s. I have also been asked to determine whether references and patents
`
`publicly available at the time the priority application to the ’141 Patent was filed
`
`on October 14, 1983 disclose all of the limitations of Claims 1-22 of the ’141
`
`Patent. Finally, I have been asked to review U.S. Patent No. 5,597,378 to Jervis
`
`(“the ’378 Patent”) to determine whether the claims of the ’141 Patent are
`
`distinguishable over the claims in that patent.
`
`4.
`
`I am not receiving hourly compensation for my time spent working on
`
`this matter, nor have I received any additional compensation for the preparation of
`
`this report. I have no interest or stake in the outcome of this case aside from being
`
`1
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`an Edwards’ employee. Further, my compensation paid by to me by Edwards is
`
`completely unrelated to the outcome of this matter.
`
`II. MATERIALS REVIEWED
`
`5.
`
`As part of my work on this declaration, I have reviewed documents
`
`provided to me by Meunier Carlin & Curfman in addition to publicly available
`
`documents and information. The documents that I have relied on to support my
`
`analysis and opinions contained in this declaration are cited herein.
`
`III. QUALIFICATIONS
`
`6.
`
`My curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit 1003. This is my first
`
`time serving as an expert witness, and I have never testified or provided a written
`
`report in any prior patent-related cases or proceedings.
`
`7.
`
`I have been employed by Edwards since 2006 and am currently Vice
`
`President of Engineering. In that role, I manage both the Advanced Materials
`
`Technology and the Advanced Packaging Technology organizations. I provide
`
`both technical and managerial leaderships to the Advanced Materials Technology
`
`in early product concept development and prototyping, material testing and
`
`computational modeling to support Edwards’ product innovation. The Advanced
`
`Packaging Technology organization engages in packaging design, testing and
`
`technology innovation to support Edwards’ new product development and
`
`2
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`sustaining operation. In my capacity at Edwards, I deal extensively with
`
`superelastic Nitinol shape memory alloys.
`
`8.
`
`In 1977, I received my Bachelor of Science degree in Materials
`
`Science and Engineering from the National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan; in
`
`1983, I received a Master of Science degree in Materials Science and Engineering
`
`from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; and in 1986, I received a
`
`Doctorate of Philosophy degree in Materials Science and Engineering from the
`
`University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. My focus during both my Masters
`
`and Doctorate studies related to phase transformations and the properties and
`
`characteristics of shape memory alloys.
`
`9.
`
`After receiving my doctoral degree, I was an adjunct research
`
`professor at the Naval Postgraduate School at Monterey, California from 1985 to
`
`1986. My postgraduate and postdoctoral research projects included studies of
`
`phase transformations in silver and copper based shape memory alloys as well as
`
`those in manganese-copper high damping alloys. These phase transformations
`
`were related to the shape memory properties and the acoustic damping effect of the
`
`materials.
`
`10.
`
`I was employed by Memry Corporation from 1986 to 2006 in various
`
`positions of increasing responsibilities. From 1986 to 1996, I was Chief
`
`Metallurgist. In that role, I was responsible for developing fabrication and heat
`3
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`treatment processes for Nitinol and Cu based shape memory actuators as well as
`
`superelastic dental and medical devices of Nitinol shape memory alloys.
`
`11.
`
`From 1996 to 2000, I was promoted to Director, then Vice President
`
`of Engineering, and later to General Manager. In these capacities, I managed the
`
`engineering function in developing Nitinol commercial, industrial and medical
`
`device applications. Later as General Manager, I had added responsibilities of
`
`manufacturing and quality assurance of the Memry Eastern Operation’s Nitinol
`
`business.
`
`12.
`
`From 2000 to 2006, I was Vice President Technology and was in
`
`charge of directing corporate technology strategy, intellectual properties and key
`
`technology development projects. During my tenure at Memry Corporation, my
`
`experience on Nitinol medical devices included vascular and non-vascular stents,
`
`aortic stentgrafts, closure devices, guidewires, laparoscopic surgical devices and
`
`orthopedic instruments.
`
`13.
`
`I have been a member of Shape Memory and Superelasticity
`
`Technologies (SMST) Society since its inception in 1992 and served as a member
`
`of the board of directors from 2004 to 2007. I am also a member of the ASM
`
`MPMD (Materials and Processes for Medical Devices) Committee and chaired the
`
`Committee from 2009 to 2011.
`
`4
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`14. While both are affiliated with ASM International, a materials
`
`information society, SMST takes on a mission to promote understanding and
`
`applications of both shape memory and superelastic Nitinol and other shape
`
`memory alloys through workshops, conferences and publications. The ASM
`
`MPMD Committee adopts a similar strategic approach to promote biomaterials in
`
`general, including Nitinol.
`
`15.
`
`I am an active member of ASM F04 subcommittee and participated in
`
`the development of all Nitinol related materials and test standards. These
`
`standards include Nitinol standard terminology, Nitinol material and tube
`
`specifications for medical devices and surgical implants, and test methods such as
`
`tension testing as well as thermal analysis and bend and free recovery testing for
`
`determination of Nitinol transformation temperatures.
`
`16.
`
`I have authored over 50 publications in scientific journals and
`
`conference proceedings on phase transformations, materials properties, test
`
`methods, designs and applications of Nitinol and other shape memory alloys. I
`
`have also coauthored a chapter entitled “Characterization of Cardiovascular
`
`Implantable Devices” in the book of “Characterization of Biomaterials,” which
`
`was published by Elsevier in early 2013. Attached as Appendix A to my report is a
`
`list of my publications of which I am aware during the past 10 years.
`
`5
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Starting with my post-graduate work in 1982, I have spent over 30
`
`years working with shape-memory metals, in particular Nitinol. My background
`
`and experience with shape-memory metals makes me uniquely qualified to discuss
`
`the particular properties and uses of these materials as they would have been
`
`known to someone in the art as of late 1983.
`
`IV. DISCUSSION OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS AND NITINOL
`
`18.
`
`To assist the Board in understanding the technology relevant to the
`
`’141 Patent, I will explain some of the inherent mechanical and property
`
`characteristics of shape-memory alloys and, in particular, Nitinol. This
`
`information was well known prior to 1983, as evidenced by the many publications
`
`and articles that I have cited in support of my analysis.
`
`A. Phase Transformations in SMAs (Austenite and Martensite)
`
`19. A basic principle of material science is that materials can assume
`
`various phases (e.g., solid, liquid, etc.). For example, water may exist in three
`
`phases: (1) solid (ice), (2) liquid, and (3) gas (steam). These phases are dependent
`
`on the temperature and pressure of the water. That is, water existing as a steam at
`
`one temperature may be turned to liquid by the application of pressure or the
`
`reduction of temperature.
`
`20.
`
`Like water, shape memory alloys (“SMAs”) exhibit multiple phases.
`
`These are referred to as the “martensite” phase and the “austenite” phase.
`6
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Martensite and austenite are each different in crystal structure, meaning that the
`
`atoms are arranged differently depending on their phase. For Nitinol in its
`
`austenite phase, the crystal structure is cubic. However, in the martensite phase –
`
`whether induced by temperature or stress – the crystal structure is monoclinic (i.e.,
`
`the base unit of the structure has three unequal axes, with one part not at right
`
`angles).1
`
`21. Notably, SMAs are afforded unique “memory” properties because
`
`their martensite phase has the ability to “store” deformation. This memory
`
`property exists because, in the martensitic phase, a SMA can be easily deformed
`
`without breaking atomic bonds. More specifically, martensite can be deformed by
`
`a flip-flopping process called twinning that occurs within the martensite. Because
`
`few, if any, atomic bonds are broken when the SMA is deformed, martensite can
`
`be very easily deformed and returned to its prior state. This is illustrated below:
`
`
`1 See, e.g., Ling et al., Phase Transitions and Shape Memory in NiTi, Metallurgical
`
`Transactions A, Vol. 11A, p. 77 (1980) (Exhibit 1008) at 77-79.
`
`7
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Figure 1: Martensite to Austenite Transformations
`
`22. While martensite can be deformed by twinning without breaking
`
`atomic bonds, austenite cannot. Thus, when a martensite crystal structure reverts
`
`back to austenite (from release of stress or heating), any deformation that was
`
`“stored” in the martensite is erased and the original shape returns. It is because of
`
`this that when stress is applied to produce martensite, the SMA may exhibit a new
`
`shape, yet the SMA will return to its original shape when the stress is removed and
`
`the SMA returns to its austenitic state (as illustrated in Figure 1).
`
`23.
`
`Thus, SMAs are unique in that they have the capability of
`
`remembering their previous shape. When a shape memory alloy is deformed due
`
`to the application of temperature (i.e., cooling) or stress (e.g., compression,
`
`8
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`bending, twisting, etc.), it can return to its original shape upon either the release of
`
`the stress or by heating. The temperature diagram illustrates how temperature
`
`causes the transition and reversion between austenitic and martensitic phases:
`
`Figure 2: SMA Temperature Phase Change Points
`
`24.
`
`If a SMA is in its martensitic phase and is heated, it transforms from
`
`martensite to austenite. The phenomenon starts at the austenite start temperature
`
`(AS), i.e., the temperature at which, upon heating, martensite begins to phase
`
`transform to austenite. The transformation is complete at the austenite finish
`
`temperature (Af), above which the SMA is fully austenitic.
`
`25. Conversely, when in its austenitic phase, if the SMA is cooled,
`
`austenite transforms back to martensite. This phenomenon starts at the martensite
`
`start temperature (MS), i.e., the temperature at which, upon cooling, austenite
`
`begins to phase transform to martensite. The transformation is complete at the
`
`martensite finish temperature (Mf), i.e., the temperature below which the SMA is
`
`9
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`fully martensitic. A simplified view of the temperature phase transformations in
`
`Nitinol SMAs is shown below. Between Af and Mf temperatures, both austenite
`
`and martensite phases can exist or co-exist depending on the thermal (exposure
`
`temperature) and mechanical history of the Nitinol SMA.
`
`Figure 3: SMA Temperature Transition Diagram
`
`26.
`
`The temperature difference between the thermally-induced martensitic
`
`and austenitic phases is referred to as “hysteresis,” and it is well known in the art
`
`that these temperatures may be controlled based on the chemical composition as
`
`well as the cold working and heat treatment of the SMA. Indeed, the Af, As, Mf,
`
`and Ms temperatures for a given alloy are all controllable during the manufacturing
`
`10
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`process and can easily be manipulated over a wide range by altering the nickel-
`
`titanium ratio of the alloy.2
`
`27. Accordingly, I have not provided specific temperature values above
`
`for Af, As, Mf, and Ms temperatures because they can easily be altered. That said,
`
`the temperatures will undoubtedly be governed by the application for which they
`
`are intended. As an example, for self-expanding medical device applications (e.g.,
`
`a stent), the Nitinol SMA – which as will be discussed is by far the most
`
`commonly used SMA – will undoubtedly have an Af at or below body temperature
`
`(~38º C) so that the SMA will fully return to its intended austenite shape when
`
`deployed in the body. Further, for this type of Nitinol SMAs, the As temperature is
`
`typically 15-20º degrees lower than the Af temperature and the Ms temperature is
`
`typically below 0° C.
`
`28.
`
`Therefore, for certain medical device applications, we can infer based
`
`on the application of the Nitinol SMA alone that Ms/Mf temperatures will be less
`
`than 0° C, the Af temperature will be at or below approximately 38º C, and the As
`
`temperature will be around or below 18-23º C.
`
`
`2 See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,569 to Dotter (March 1983) (Exhibit 1009) at 3:15-
`
`27 and 5:5-20.
`
`11
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`B. The Shape Memory Effect (Thermal and Mechanical) and
`Pseudoelasticity
`
`29.
`
`The ability of SMAs to revert to an original shape when changing
`
`from martensite to austenite phases due to increase in temperature is called the
`
`“shape memory effect.” This term refers to both thermal and mechanical shape
`
`memory effects (as explored herein).
`
`30.
`
`Thermal shape memory (sometimes referred to as “shape memory”)
`
`generally refers to the process of cooling a SMA to its martensitic state, deforming
`
`the SMA, and then heating the SMA back above its As or Af temperature so that
`
`the SMA reverts to its austenitic phase and returns to its undeformed shape.
`
`31.
`
`This phase transformation from austenite to martensite – when
`
`occurring without the influence of stress – is referred to as a “thermally-induced
`
`phase transformation” (and the resulting martensite is referred to as “thermally-
`
`induced martensite or “TIM”).
`
`32. With reference to Figures 2 and 3 above, TIM begins forming in the
`
`SMA at the SMA’s Ms temperature, and at the Mf temperature, the SMA
`
`transforms completely to thermally-induced martensite. Importantly here, prior to
`
`the Ms temperature being reached, the SMA remains fully in its austenitic phase.
`
`This is true even though a SMA that is cooled may be more malleable at a lower
`
`temperature. That is, the fact that the alloy is more malleable (e.g., like solder)
`
`12
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 14
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`does not mean a phase change has occurred. Indeed, a SMA may be much more
`
`malleable below its As temperature, yet still remain in an austenitic state.
`
`33. As illustrated in Figure 1 above, phase transformations in SMAs can
`
`be equally driven by temperature or stress. That is, one can thermally induce
`
`martensite or one can stress induce martensite. Stress-induced martensite or
`
`“SIM” occurs whenever stress is applied to an SMA above its Mf temperature.3
`
`34.
`
`The relationship between inducing TIM or SIM is a linear
`
`equivalence,4 as shown below. This linear relationship is derived from the
`
`
`3 See, e.g., Delaey, et al., Thermoelasticity, Pseudoelasticity and the Memory
`
`Effects Associated with Martensitic Transformations. Part 1: Structural and
`
`Microstructural Changes Associated with the Transformations, Journal of
`
`Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1521 (1974) (“Delaey,” Exhibit 1010) at 1521-22
`
`(“martensite transformations can be induced by the application of stress as well as
`
`by changes in temperature”).
`
`4 Krishnan, et al., Thermoplasticity, Pseudoeleasticity and the Memory Effects
`
`Associated with Martensitic Transformations. Part 2: The Macroscopic
`
`Mechanical Behavior, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1536 (1974)
`
`(Exhibit 1011) at 1536-37.
`
`13
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Clausius-Clapeyron equation,5 a mathematical equation explaining fundamental
`
`thermodynamic principles, which was first published in 1834. As shown in this
`
`figure, as well as Figure 1, phase transformations in SMAs can be driven equally
`
`by temperature or stress.
`
`Figure 4: Linear Equivalence of SIM/TIM
`
`35.
`
`Therefore, either stress and/or temperature may be adjusted to
`
`determine which phase of the two crystal structures is stable at any given moment.6
`
`5 See, e.g., Otsuka et al., Pseudoelasticity, Metals Forum, Vol. 4:3, p. 142 (1981) at
`
`143 (“Otsuka 1981,” Exhibit 1012).
`
`6 See generally Patel et al., Criterion for the Action of Applied Stress in the
`
`Maternsitic Transformation, ACTA Metallurgica, Vol. 1, p. 531 (1953) (Exhibit
`
`1013) at 531-538.
`
`14
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 16
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`This equivalence is analogous to the phase change of water from liquid to steam
`
`through the application of heat or pressure. In either case, the water possesses the
`
`inherent quality of being able to change from liquid or steam through either
`
`process, just like a SMA may change from austenite to martensite through the
`
`application of either temperature or stress.
`
`36.
`
`This equivalence has been known for many years, and indeed was
`
`well known prior to the filing date of the priority application for the ’141 Patent.
`
`For example, as noted in the JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE in a 1974 article,
`
`“[t]he pseudoelastic behavior [of an SMA] is a complete mechanical analogue to
`
`the thermoelastic transformation. In this case the transformation [to martensite]
`
`proceeds continuously with increasing applied stress … and is reversed
`
`continuously when the stress is decreased.”7
`
`37.
`
`This behavior, which is termed “pseudoelasticity” or
`
`“superelasticity” means that a SMA will exhibit elastic (sometimes referred to as
`
`“plastic”) deformation well beyond normal strain (i.e., deformation per unit
`
`dimension) limits by phase changing from austenite to stress-induced martensite,
`
`and will recover, changing back from SIM to austenite when the stress is relieved.
`
`For example, some SMAs may be stressed many orders of magnitude (e.g., 30x)
`
`
`7 Delaey (Exhibit 1010) at 1522.
`
`15
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 17
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`beyond the elastic strain limit of traditional non-pseudoelastic materials (such as
`
`steel) while exhibiting a full recovery.
`
`38.
`
`Importantly, as discussed in further detail below, if a SMA exhibits
`
`thermally-induced martensite, it will also inherently exhibit stress-induced
`
`martensite.
`
`39. Martensite formation in SMAs can be graphically illustrated by the
`
`following stress-strain curve, which was included in Schetky’s publication in
`
`1979:8
`
`
`8 Schetky, Shape Memory Alloys, Scientific American, Vol. 241:5, p. 74 (1979)
`
`(“Schetky,” Exhibit 1014) at 80.
`
`16
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 18
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`40.
`
`This shows graphically how the shape memory effect produced
`
`through superelasticity (i.e., pseudoelasticity) is caused by the ability of the SMA
`
`to change its phase from austenite to martensite with continued application of
`
`stress, allowing a SMA to exhibit “super” elastic deformation. When the stress is
`
`released, the SIM transforms back into austenite and the SMA returns back to its
`
`original unstressed shape. This behavior of pseudoelasticity is defined in Figure 2
`
`of the ‘141 patent.
`
`41.
`
`In practice, the temperature ranges for formation of stress-induced
`
`martensite and resulting pseudoelasticity may be illustrated as follows:
`
`17
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 19
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Figure 5: Temperature Range for SIM and Pseudoelasticity
`
`42. As shown, pseudoelasticity occurs over a temperature range between
`
`As and Md, where Md is the temperature above which one can no longer stress
`
`induce martensite. In most SMA variations (and especially in pseudoelastic
`
`Nitinol, as discussed in more detail below), the Md temperature is about 150
`
`degrees (well above most medical applications).9
`
`43. Also, while SIM will develop with the application of stress between
`
`the Mf and Md temperatures (as noted in the figure), pseudoelasticity will not occur
`
`if the temperature of the SMA remains below the SMA’s austenite start (As)
`
`temperature That is, while austenite may be converted to martensite between Mf
`
`9 T.W. Duerig et al., Ti-Ni Shape Memory Alloys, Materials Properties Handbook:
`
`Titanium Alloys, p. 1035 (1994) (Exhibit 1028) at 1035-48.
`
`18
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 20
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`and Md through compression or stress (i.e., SIM), the SMA will not return to its
`
`prior shape when the compression or stress is relieved unless the temperature of the
`
`device rises above its As temperature (because below the As temperature, the
`
`stress-induced martensite remains stable). This behavior of shape recovery due to
`
`the reversion of SIM back to the austenitic state on heating above As (and Af)
`
`temperature is described in the detailed description on Figure 1 of the ‘141 patent.
`
`This property of SMA was well known before 1983. For example, Krishnan
`
`described this as one mechanism for shape memory effect, i.e., “memory effect by
`
`(stress-induced) transformation” in Figure 11 of their 1974 article (Krishnan, et al.,
`
`Thermoplasticity, Pseudoeleasticity and the Memory Effects Associated with
`
`Martensitic Transformations. Part 2: The Macroscopic Mechanical Behavior,
`
`Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1536 (1974) (Exhibit 1011) at 1536-37).
`
`For the ease of discussion and to differentiate it from thermal shape memory effect
`
`associated with thermally induced martensite, I refer to this behavior herein as
`
`“mechanical shape memory effect.”
`
`44. As noted previously in paragraphs 27 and 28, for self-expanding
`
`medical devices, the Af temperature will by design almost always be at about or
`
`below body temperature to ensure that the material exhibits a full shape memory
`
`recovery when released into the body. Otherwise, the purpose of the device (i.e.,
`
`to self-expand in the body) would not occur.
`19
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 21
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`45.
`
`This means that when SMAs are used for self-expanding medical
`
`devices in the body, the SMA will exhibit an As well below body temperature,
`
`resulting in the practical effect of inducing mechanical shape memory and
`
`pseudoelasticity through the use of SIM.
`
`46.
`
`This is because, as previously noted, the As temperature for self-
`
`expanding medical device applications will be around or below 20° C, and the
`
`temperature-induced martensitic temperature (Ms) will be well below 0° C. Thus,
`
`even in applications where a SMA is cooled in ice water or saline prior to use,
`
`stress-induced martensitic state is still utilized (and thermally induced martensite is
`
`not used).
`
`47.
`
`For example, in Cragg I (Exhibit 1004), a publication from early
`
`1983 that is cited in the ’141 Patent, a Nitinol stent that exists in its austenitic state
`
`at body temperature is cooled in ice water, deformed, and placed in a catheter for
`
`insertion into the body. This process does not involve TIM. Indeed, the SMA
`
`(Nitinol in Cragg I) has been annealed at a high temperature to “memorize” its coil
`
`shape, and it possesses a martensite temperature (Ms) that is well below 0° C.
`
`Thus, there is no formation of martensite through TIM when the SMA is cooled in
`
`the ice water (because the ice water naturally has a temperature above 0° C).
`
`48.
`
`Instead, when Cragg I teaches cooling, it is reducing the SMA below
`
`its As temperature such that – when the SMA is deformed – it exhibits deformation
`20
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 22
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`through stress-induced martensite not thermally-induced martensite. Because the
`
`temperature of the SMA is below As, the device does not immediately start to form
`
`its original shape (i.e., exhibit mechanical shape memory upon warming to body
`
`temperature) because the stress-induced martensite is stable.
`
`49. When the SMA in Cragg I eventually reaches its As temperature,
`
`which happens at least when the device is inserted into the body, the mechanical
`
`shape memory effect takes place, causing the SMA to attempt to revert back to its
`
`unstressed shape. However, because the Nitinol wire is within a catheter, the
`
`catheter prevents the transformation from occurring, thus keeping the SMA in its
`
`constrained stress-induced martensitic state.
`
`50. Cragg I acknowledges that the catheter constrains the Nitinol wire by
`
`stating that friction develops within the catheter upon insertion of the catheter into
`
`the body.10 Thus, because the SMA coil stent in Cragg I remains constrained
`
`within the confines of the narrow catheter, the SMA cannot fully expand, but
`
`
`10 Cragg I at 262 (“The wire we used in this study transformed over a broad
`
`temperature range (25-38° C), which required flushing the introducing catheter
`
`with cold saline to minimize transformation of the wire in the catheter. We also
`
`used a 10-F Teflon introducing catheter to reduce friction of the partially
`
`transformed coil in the catheter.”) (emphasis added).
`
`21
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 23
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`instead remains in a stress-induced martensitic state due to SIM. Only upon
`
`deployment from the catheter is the stress relieved, allowing the SMA stent to self-
`
`expand due to the conversion of martensite to austenite and the inherent property
`
`of mechanical shape memory.
`
`51.
`
`This illustrates that even when cooling is used in medical device
`
`applications in the prior art, it does not disclose invoking thermal shape memory
`
`(i.e., thermally-induced martensite), but instead relies on the principles of stress-
`
`induced martensite and mechanical shape memory inherent in the selected SMA –
`
`exactly the same as what is claimed in the ’141 patent.
`
`C. The Widely Used SMA “Nitinol”
`
`52. Having provided an overview of SMAs generally, I will now focus on
`
`Nitinol, which is by far the most notable and widely used SMA. The shape-
`
`memory effects of Nitinol were discovered by William J. Buehler and Dr.
`
`Frederick E. Wang of the U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory in 1962.11 The word
`
`“Nitinol” in fact derives its name from “nickel-titanium Naval Ordnance
`
`Laboratory.” It has also been called several other names, including Tinel, Flexon,
`
`
`11 Kauffman et al., The Story of Nitinol: The Serendipitous Discovery of the
`
`Memory Metal and Its Applications, The Chemical Educator 1, Vol. 2:2, pp. 4-6
`
`(1996) (“Kauffman,” Exhibit 1027).
`
`22
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 24
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`and Ni-Ti, Ti-Ni, and simply nickel-titanium.
`
`53. Nitinol generally refers to a range of alloys containing nickel and
`
`titanium, usually in relatively equal amounts. The property features of the SMA
`
`have been well documented in the literature since well before 1983.12 Moreover,
`
`all prior art references that I have relied on for my analysis of the invalidity of the
`
`’141 Patent claims involve the use of SMAs that include Nitinol.
`
`54. Nitinol is widely used in part because in 1979 a leading researcher in
`
`the field of SMAs, Dr. L. McDonald Schetky, popularized the use of Nitinol in
`
`various commercial applications, including medical devices. In his article entitled
`
`Shape-Memory Alloys, which was published in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN – a widely
`
`circulated periodical at that time – Dr. Schetky discussed the use of Nitinol in
`
`space exploration, aircraft design, electrical connections, writing utensils, and
`
`medical devices, among others.13
`
`
`12 See, e.g., Frederick E. Wang et. al, The Irreversible Critical Range in the NiTi
`
`Transition, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 39:5, pp. 2166-2175 (April 1968)
`
`(Exhibit 1032); D.B. Chernov, et. al., The Multiplicity of Structural Transitions in
`
`Alloy Based on TiNi, Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 24:8, pp. 664-666 (August
`
`1979) (Exhibit 1023).
`
`13 See Schetky (Exhibit 1014) at 79.
`
`23
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 25
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`55.
`
`Specifically related to medical devices, Schetky noted that “Nitinol
`
`does not react adversely with living tissue” and described using Nitinol to fasten
`
`artificial joints, facilitate the alignment of fractured bones, and filtering blood clots
`
`out of the circulatory system. As to a medical application intended for filtering
`
`clots, Schetky provided the following:
`
`Morris Simon of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston and the
`Harvard Medical School conceived the idea of fabricating a
`screenlike filter with a mesh size of about two millimeters from
`a continuous length of Nitinol wire. The wire can be
`straightened out when it is cooled below the martensite-
`transformation temperature, chosen to be well below body
`temperature. As the wire is chilled to maintain its straightened
`condition, it can be inserted through a catheter in an arm vein
`into the vena cava, the large vein that feeds into the heart. As
`the wire warms up it assumes the screenlike form. Experiments
`on dogs have been encouraging.14
`
`56.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket