`
`PETITIONER EDWARDS’ EXHIBIT NO. 1002
`
`DECLARATION OF MING H. WU, Ph.D.
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.68, 42.63, AND 42.65
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 1
`
`II. MATERIALS REVIEWED ................................................................. 2
`
`III. QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................. 2
`
`IV. DISCUSSION OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS AND NITINOL .... 6
`
`V.
`
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART ............................. 27
`
`VI.
`
`THE JERVIS ’141 PATENT .............................................................. 29
`
`VII. PRIOR ART TO THE ’141 PATENT ................................................ 36
`
`VIII. SUMMARY OF OPINIONS .............................................................. 69
`
`i
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`I. BACKGROUND
`
`1.
`
`I am over the age of 18 and a citizen of United States of America. My
`
`permanent residence is 1462 Voyager Drive, Tustin, California.
`
`2.
`
`I have been asked by the law firm of Meunier Carlin & Curfman,
`
`LLC, on behalf of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (“Edwards”), to provide my
`
`technical analysis and opinions regarding prior art references and technology
`
`relevant to U.S. Patent No. 6,306,141 to Jervis (“the ’141 Patent”).
`
`3.
`
`More specifically, I have been asked to explain the physical and
`
`inherent properties of shape memory alloys (SMAs), including Nitinol, and to
`
`describe the state of technology with regard to Nitinol in the late 1970’s and early
`
`1980’s. I have also been asked to determine whether references and patents
`
`publicly available at the time the priority application to the ’141 Patent was filed
`
`on October 14, 1983 disclose all of the limitations of Claims 1-22 of the ’141
`
`Patent. Finally, I have been asked to review U.S. Patent No. 5,597,378 to Jervis
`
`(“the ’378 Patent”) to determine whether the claims of the ’141 Patent are
`
`distinguishable over the claims in that patent.
`
`4.
`
`I am not receiving hourly compensation for my time spent working on
`
`this matter, nor have I received any additional compensation for the preparation of
`
`this report. I have no interest or stake in the outcome of this case aside from being
`
`1
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`an Edwards’ employee. Further, my compensation paid by to me by Edwards is
`
`completely unrelated to the outcome of this matter.
`
`II. MATERIALS REVIEWED
`
`5.
`
`As part of my work on this declaration, I have reviewed documents
`
`provided to me by Meunier Carlin & Curfman in addition to publicly available
`
`documents and information. The documents that I have relied on to support my
`
`analysis and opinions contained in this declaration are cited herein.
`
`III. QUALIFICATIONS
`
`6.
`
`My curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit 1003. This is my first
`
`time serving as an expert witness, and I have never testified or provided a written
`
`report in any prior patent-related cases or proceedings.
`
`7.
`
`I have been employed by Edwards since 2006 and am currently Vice
`
`President of Engineering. In that role, I manage both the Advanced Materials
`
`Technology and the Advanced Packaging Technology organizations. I provide
`
`both technical and managerial leaderships to the Advanced Materials Technology
`
`in early product concept development and prototyping, material testing and
`
`computational modeling to support Edwards’ product innovation. The Advanced
`
`Packaging Technology organization engages in packaging design, testing and
`
`technology innovation to support Edwards’ new product development and
`
`2
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`sustaining operation. In my capacity at Edwards, I deal extensively with
`
`superelastic Nitinol shape memory alloys.
`
`8.
`
`In 1977, I received my Bachelor of Science degree in Materials
`
`Science and Engineering from the National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan; in
`
`1983, I received a Master of Science degree in Materials Science and Engineering
`
`from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; and in 1986, I received a
`
`Doctorate of Philosophy degree in Materials Science and Engineering from the
`
`University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. My focus during both my Masters
`
`and Doctorate studies related to phase transformations and the properties and
`
`characteristics of shape memory alloys.
`
`9.
`
`After receiving my doctoral degree, I was an adjunct research
`
`professor at the Naval Postgraduate School at Monterey, California from 1985 to
`
`1986. My postgraduate and postdoctoral research projects included studies of
`
`phase transformations in silver and copper based shape memory alloys as well as
`
`those in manganese-copper high damping alloys. These phase transformations
`
`were related to the shape memory properties and the acoustic damping effect of the
`
`materials.
`
`10.
`
`I was employed by Memry Corporation from 1986 to 2006 in various
`
`positions of increasing responsibilities. From 1986 to 1996, I was Chief
`
`Metallurgist. In that role, I was responsible for developing fabrication and heat
`3
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`treatment processes for Nitinol and Cu based shape memory actuators as well as
`
`superelastic dental and medical devices of Nitinol shape memory alloys.
`
`11.
`
`From 1996 to 2000, I was promoted to Director, then Vice President
`
`of Engineering, and later to General Manager. In these capacities, I managed the
`
`engineering function in developing Nitinol commercial, industrial and medical
`
`device applications. Later as General Manager, I had added responsibilities of
`
`manufacturing and quality assurance of the Memry Eastern Operation’s Nitinol
`
`business.
`
`12.
`
`From 2000 to 2006, I was Vice President Technology and was in
`
`charge of directing corporate technology strategy, intellectual properties and key
`
`technology development projects. During my tenure at Memry Corporation, my
`
`experience on Nitinol medical devices included vascular and non-vascular stents,
`
`aortic stentgrafts, closure devices, guidewires, laparoscopic surgical devices and
`
`orthopedic instruments.
`
`13.
`
`I have been a member of Shape Memory and Superelasticity
`
`Technologies (SMST) Society since its inception in 1992 and served as a member
`
`of the board of directors from 2004 to 2007. I am also a member of the ASM
`
`MPMD (Materials and Processes for Medical Devices) Committee and chaired the
`
`Committee from 2009 to 2011.
`
`4
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`14. While both are affiliated with ASM International, a materials
`
`information society, SMST takes on a mission to promote understanding and
`
`applications of both shape memory and superelastic Nitinol and other shape
`
`memory alloys through workshops, conferences and publications. The ASM
`
`MPMD Committee adopts a similar strategic approach to promote biomaterials in
`
`general, including Nitinol.
`
`15.
`
`I am an active member of ASM F04 subcommittee and participated in
`
`the development of all Nitinol related materials and test standards. These
`
`standards include Nitinol standard terminology, Nitinol material and tube
`
`specifications for medical devices and surgical implants, and test methods such as
`
`tension testing as well as thermal analysis and bend and free recovery testing for
`
`determination of Nitinol transformation temperatures.
`
`16.
`
`I have authored over 50 publications in scientific journals and
`
`conference proceedings on phase transformations, materials properties, test
`
`methods, designs and applications of Nitinol and other shape memory alloys. I
`
`have also coauthored a chapter entitled “Characterization of Cardiovascular
`
`Implantable Devices” in the book of “Characterization of Biomaterials,” which
`
`was published by Elsevier in early 2013. Attached as Appendix A to my report is a
`
`list of my publications of which I am aware during the past 10 years.
`
`5
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Starting with my post-graduate work in 1982, I have spent over 30
`
`years working with shape-memory metals, in particular Nitinol. My background
`
`and experience with shape-memory metals makes me uniquely qualified to discuss
`
`the particular properties and uses of these materials as they would have been
`
`known to someone in the art as of late 1983.
`
`IV. DISCUSSION OF SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS AND NITINOL
`
`18.
`
`To assist the Board in understanding the technology relevant to the
`
`’141 Patent, I will explain some of the inherent mechanical and property
`
`characteristics of shape-memory alloys and, in particular, Nitinol. This
`
`information was well known prior to 1983, as evidenced by the many publications
`
`and articles that I have cited in support of my analysis.
`
`A. Phase Transformations in SMAs (Austenite and Martensite)
`
`19. A basic principle of material science is that materials can assume
`
`various phases (e.g., solid, liquid, etc.). For example, water may exist in three
`
`phases: (1) solid (ice), (2) liquid, and (3) gas (steam). These phases are dependent
`
`on the temperature and pressure of the water. That is, water existing as a steam at
`
`one temperature may be turned to liquid by the application of pressure or the
`
`reduction of temperature.
`
`20.
`
`Like water, shape memory alloys (“SMAs”) exhibit multiple phases.
`
`These are referred to as the “martensite” phase and the “austenite” phase.
`6
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Martensite and austenite are each different in crystal structure, meaning that the
`
`atoms are arranged differently depending on their phase. For Nitinol in its
`
`austenite phase, the crystal structure is cubic. However, in the martensite phase –
`
`whether induced by temperature or stress – the crystal structure is monoclinic (i.e.,
`
`the base unit of the structure has three unequal axes, with one part not at right
`
`angles).1
`
`21. Notably, SMAs are afforded unique “memory” properties because
`
`their martensite phase has the ability to “store” deformation. This memory
`
`property exists because, in the martensitic phase, a SMA can be easily deformed
`
`without breaking atomic bonds. More specifically, martensite can be deformed by
`
`a flip-flopping process called twinning that occurs within the martensite. Because
`
`few, if any, atomic bonds are broken when the SMA is deformed, martensite can
`
`be very easily deformed and returned to its prior state. This is illustrated below:
`
`
`1 See, e.g., Ling et al., Phase Transitions and Shape Memory in NiTi, Metallurgical
`
`Transactions A, Vol. 11A, p. 77 (1980) (Exhibit 1008) at 77-79.
`
`7
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Figure 1: Martensite to Austenite Transformations
`
`22. While martensite can be deformed by twinning without breaking
`
`atomic bonds, austenite cannot. Thus, when a martensite crystal structure reverts
`
`back to austenite (from release of stress or heating), any deformation that was
`
`“stored” in the martensite is erased and the original shape returns. It is because of
`
`this that when stress is applied to produce martensite, the SMA may exhibit a new
`
`shape, yet the SMA will return to its original shape when the stress is removed and
`
`the SMA returns to its austenitic state (as illustrated in Figure 1).
`
`23.
`
`Thus, SMAs are unique in that they have the capability of
`
`remembering their previous shape. When a shape memory alloy is deformed due
`
`to the application of temperature (i.e., cooling) or stress (e.g., compression,
`
`8
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`bending, twisting, etc.), it can return to its original shape upon either the release of
`
`the stress or by heating. The temperature diagram illustrates how temperature
`
`causes the transition and reversion between austenitic and martensitic phases:
`
`Figure 2: SMA Temperature Phase Change Points
`
`24.
`
`If a SMA is in its martensitic phase and is heated, it transforms from
`
`martensite to austenite. The phenomenon starts at the austenite start temperature
`
`(AS), i.e., the temperature at which, upon heating, martensite begins to phase
`
`transform to austenite. The transformation is complete at the austenite finish
`
`temperature (Af), above which the SMA is fully austenitic.
`
`25. Conversely, when in its austenitic phase, if the SMA is cooled,
`
`austenite transforms back to martensite. This phenomenon starts at the martensite
`
`start temperature (MS), i.e., the temperature at which, upon cooling, austenite
`
`begins to phase transform to martensite. The transformation is complete at the
`
`martensite finish temperature (Mf), i.e., the temperature below which the SMA is
`
`9
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`fully martensitic. A simplified view of the temperature phase transformations in
`
`Nitinol SMAs is shown below. Between Af and Mf temperatures, both austenite
`
`and martensite phases can exist or co-exist depending on the thermal (exposure
`
`temperature) and mechanical history of the Nitinol SMA.
`
`Figure 3: SMA Temperature Transition Diagram
`
`26.
`
`The temperature difference between the thermally-induced martensitic
`
`and austenitic phases is referred to as “hysteresis,” and it is well known in the art
`
`that these temperatures may be controlled based on the chemical composition as
`
`well as the cold working and heat treatment of the SMA. Indeed, the Af, As, Mf,
`
`and Ms temperatures for a given alloy are all controllable during the manufacturing
`
`10
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`process and can easily be manipulated over a wide range by altering the nickel-
`
`titanium ratio of the alloy.2
`
`27. Accordingly, I have not provided specific temperature values above
`
`for Af, As, Mf, and Ms temperatures because they can easily be altered. That said,
`
`the temperatures will undoubtedly be governed by the application for which they
`
`are intended. As an example, for self-expanding medical device applications (e.g.,
`
`a stent), the Nitinol SMA – which as will be discussed is by far the most
`
`commonly used SMA – will undoubtedly have an Af at or below body temperature
`
`(~38º C) so that the SMA will fully return to its intended austenite shape when
`
`deployed in the body. Further, for this type of Nitinol SMAs, the As temperature is
`
`typically 15-20º degrees lower than the Af temperature and the Ms temperature is
`
`typically below 0° C.
`
`28.
`
`Therefore, for certain medical device applications, we can infer based
`
`on the application of the Nitinol SMA alone that Ms/Mf temperatures will be less
`
`than 0° C, the Af temperature will be at or below approximately 38º C, and the As
`
`temperature will be around or below 18-23º C.
`
`
`2 See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,569 to Dotter (March 1983) (Exhibit 1009) at 3:15-
`
`27 and 5:5-20.
`
`11
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`B. The Shape Memory Effect (Thermal and Mechanical) and
`Pseudoelasticity
`
`29.
`
`The ability of SMAs to revert to an original shape when changing
`
`from martensite to austenite phases due to increase in temperature is called the
`
`“shape memory effect.” This term refers to both thermal and mechanical shape
`
`memory effects (as explored herein).
`
`30.
`
`Thermal shape memory (sometimes referred to as “shape memory”)
`
`generally refers to the process of cooling a SMA to its martensitic state, deforming
`
`the SMA, and then heating the SMA back above its As or Af temperature so that
`
`the SMA reverts to its austenitic phase and returns to its undeformed shape.
`
`31.
`
`This phase transformation from austenite to martensite – when
`
`occurring without the influence of stress – is referred to as a “thermally-induced
`
`phase transformation” (and the resulting martensite is referred to as “thermally-
`
`induced martensite or “TIM”).
`
`32. With reference to Figures 2 and 3 above, TIM begins forming in the
`
`SMA at the SMA’s Ms temperature, and at the Mf temperature, the SMA
`
`transforms completely to thermally-induced martensite. Importantly here, prior to
`
`the Ms temperature being reached, the SMA remains fully in its austenitic phase.
`
`This is true even though a SMA that is cooled may be more malleable at a lower
`
`temperature. That is, the fact that the alloy is more malleable (e.g., like solder)
`
`12
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`does not mean a phase change has occurred. Indeed, a SMA may be much more
`
`malleable below its As temperature, yet still remain in an austenitic state.
`
`33. As illustrated in Figure 1 above, phase transformations in SMAs can
`
`be equally driven by temperature or stress. That is, one can thermally induce
`
`martensite or one can stress induce martensite. Stress-induced martensite or
`
`“SIM” occurs whenever stress is applied to an SMA above its Mf temperature.3
`
`34.
`
`The relationship between inducing TIM or SIM is a linear
`
`equivalence,4 as shown below. This linear relationship is derived from the
`
`
`3 See, e.g., Delaey, et al., Thermoelasticity, Pseudoelasticity and the Memory
`
`Effects Associated with Martensitic Transformations. Part 1: Structural and
`
`Microstructural Changes Associated with the Transformations, Journal of
`
`Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1521 (1974) (“Delaey,” Exhibit 1010) at 1521-22
`
`(“martensite transformations can be induced by the application of stress as well as
`
`by changes in temperature”).
`
`4 Krishnan, et al., Thermoplasticity, Pseudoeleasticity and the Memory Effects
`
`Associated with Martensitic Transformations. Part 2: The Macroscopic
`
`Mechanical Behavior, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1536 (1974)
`
`(Exhibit 1011) at 1536-37.
`
`13
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Clausius-Clapeyron equation,5 a mathematical equation explaining fundamental
`
`thermodynamic principles, which was first published in 1834. As shown in this
`
`figure, as well as Figure 1, phase transformations in SMAs can be driven equally
`
`by temperature or stress.
`
`Figure 4: Linear Equivalence of SIM/TIM
`
`35.
`
`Therefore, either stress and/or temperature may be adjusted to
`
`determine which phase of the two crystal structures is stable at any given moment.6
`
`5 See, e.g., Otsuka et al., Pseudoelasticity, Metals Forum, Vol. 4:3, p. 142 (1981) at
`
`143 (“Otsuka 1981,” Exhibit 1012).
`
`6 See generally Patel et al., Criterion for the Action of Applied Stress in the
`
`Maternsitic Transformation, ACTA Metallurgica, Vol. 1, p. 531 (1953) (Exhibit
`
`1013) at 531-538.
`
`14
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`This equivalence is analogous to the phase change of water from liquid to steam
`
`through the application of heat or pressure. In either case, the water possesses the
`
`inherent quality of being able to change from liquid or steam through either
`
`process, just like a SMA may change from austenite to martensite through the
`
`application of either temperature or stress.
`
`36.
`
`This equivalence has been known for many years, and indeed was
`
`well known prior to the filing date of the priority application for the ’141 Patent.
`
`For example, as noted in the JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE in a 1974 article,
`
`“[t]he pseudoelastic behavior [of an SMA] is a complete mechanical analogue to
`
`the thermoelastic transformation. In this case the transformation [to martensite]
`
`proceeds continuously with increasing applied stress … and is reversed
`
`continuously when the stress is decreased.”7
`
`37.
`
`This behavior, which is termed “pseudoelasticity” or
`
`“superelasticity” means that a SMA will exhibit elastic (sometimes referred to as
`
`“plastic”) deformation well beyond normal strain (i.e., deformation per unit
`
`dimension) limits by phase changing from austenite to stress-induced martensite,
`
`and will recover, changing back from SIM to austenite when the stress is relieved.
`
`For example, some SMAs may be stressed many orders of magnitude (e.g., 30x)
`
`
`7 Delaey (Exhibit 1010) at 1522.
`
`15
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`beyond the elastic strain limit of traditional non-pseudoelastic materials (such as
`
`steel) while exhibiting a full recovery.
`
`38.
`
`Importantly, as discussed in further detail below, if a SMA exhibits
`
`thermally-induced martensite, it will also inherently exhibit stress-induced
`
`martensite.
`
`39. Martensite formation in SMAs can be graphically illustrated by the
`
`following stress-strain curve, which was included in Schetky’s publication in
`
`1979:8
`
`
`8 Schetky, Shape Memory Alloys, Scientific American, Vol. 241:5, p. 74 (1979)
`
`(“Schetky,” Exhibit 1014) at 80.
`
`16
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`40.
`
`This shows graphically how the shape memory effect produced
`
`through superelasticity (i.e., pseudoelasticity) is caused by the ability of the SMA
`
`to change its phase from austenite to martensite with continued application of
`
`stress, allowing a SMA to exhibit “super” elastic deformation. When the stress is
`
`released, the SIM transforms back into austenite and the SMA returns back to its
`
`original unstressed shape. This behavior of pseudoelasticity is defined in Figure 2
`
`of the ‘141 patent.
`
`41.
`
`In practice, the temperature ranges for formation of stress-induced
`
`martensite and resulting pseudoelasticity may be illustrated as follows:
`
`17
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Figure 5: Temperature Range for SIM and Pseudoelasticity
`
`42. As shown, pseudoelasticity occurs over a temperature range between
`
`As and Md, where Md is the temperature above which one can no longer stress
`
`induce martensite. In most SMA variations (and especially in pseudoelastic
`
`Nitinol, as discussed in more detail below), the Md temperature is about 150
`
`degrees (well above most medical applications).9
`
`43. Also, while SIM will develop with the application of stress between
`
`the Mf and Md temperatures (as noted in the figure), pseudoelasticity will not occur
`
`if the temperature of the SMA remains below the SMA’s austenite start (As)
`
`temperature That is, while austenite may be converted to martensite between Mf
`
`9 T.W. Duerig et al., Ti-Ni Shape Memory Alloys, Materials Properties Handbook:
`
`Titanium Alloys, p. 1035 (1994) (Exhibit 1028) at 1035-48.
`
`18
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 20
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`and Md through compression or stress (i.e., SIM), the SMA will not return to its
`
`prior shape when the compression or stress is relieved unless the temperature of the
`
`device rises above its As temperature (because below the As temperature, the
`
`stress-induced martensite remains stable). This behavior of shape recovery due to
`
`the reversion of SIM back to the austenitic state on heating above As (and Af)
`
`temperature is described in the detailed description on Figure 1 of the ‘141 patent.
`
`This property of SMA was well known before 1983. For example, Krishnan
`
`described this as one mechanism for shape memory effect, i.e., “memory effect by
`
`(stress-induced) transformation” in Figure 11 of their 1974 article (Krishnan, et al.,
`
`Thermoplasticity, Pseudoeleasticity and the Memory Effects Associated with
`
`Martensitic Transformations. Part 2: The Macroscopic Mechanical Behavior,
`
`Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 9, p. 1536 (1974) (Exhibit 1011) at 1536-37).
`
`For the ease of discussion and to differentiate it from thermal shape memory effect
`
`associated with thermally induced martensite, I refer to this behavior herein as
`
`“mechanical shape memory effect.”
`
`44. As noted previously in paragraphs 27 and 28, for self-expanding
`
`medical devices, the Af temperature will by design almost always be at about or
`
`below body temperature to ensure that the material exhibits a full shape memory
`
`recovery when released into the body. Otherwise, the purpose of the device (i.e.,
`
`to self-expand in the body) would not occur.
`19
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`45.
`
`This means that when SMAs are used for self-expanding medical
`
`devices in the body, the SMA will exhibit an As well below body temperature,
`
`resulting in the practical effect of inducing mechanical shape memory and
`
`pseudoelasticity through the use of SIM.
`
`46.
`
`This is because, as previously noted, the As temperature for self-
`
`expanding medical device applications will be around or below 20° C, and the
`
`temperature-induced martensitic temperature (Ms) will be well below 0° C. Thus,
`
`even in applications where a SMA is cooled in ice water or saline prior to use,
`
`stress-induced martensitic state is still utilized (and thermally induced martensite is
`
`not used).
`
`47.
`
`For example, in Cragg I (Exhibit 1004), a publication from early
`
`1983 that is cited in the ’141 Patent, a Nitinol stent that exists in its austenitic state
`
`at body temperature is cooled in ice water, deformed, and placed in a catheter for
`
`insertion into the body. This process does not involve TIM. Indeed, the SMA
`
`(Nitinol in Cragg I) has been annealed at a high temperature to “memorize” its coil
`
`shape, and it possesses a martensite temperature (Ms) that is well below 0° C.
`
`Thus, there is no formation of martensite through TIM when the SMA is cooled in
`
`the ice water (because the ice water naturally has a temperature above 0° C).
`
`48.
`
`Instead, when Cragg I teaches cooling, it is reducing the SMA below
`
`its As temperature such that – when the SMA is deformed – it exhibits deformation
`20
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`through stress-induced martensite not thermally-induced martensite. Because the
`
`temperature of the SMA is below As, the device does not immediately start to form
`
`its original shape (i.e., exhibit mechanical shape memory upon warming to body
`
`temperature) because the stress-induced martensite is stable.
`
`49. When the SMA in Cragg I eventually reaches its As temperature,
`
`which happens at least when the device is inserted into the body, the mechanical
`
`shape memory effect takes place, causing the SMA to attempt to revert back to its
`
`unstressed shape. However, because the Nitinol wire is within a catheter, the
`
`catheter prevents the transformation from occurring, thus keeping the SMA in its
`
`constrained stress-induced martensitic state.
`
`50. Cragg I acknowledges that the catheter constrains the Nitinol wire by
`
`stating that friction develops within the catheter upon insertion of the catheter into
`
`the body.10 Thus, because the SMA coil stent in Cragg I remains constrained
`
`within the confines of the narrow catheter, the SMA cannot fully expand, but
`
`
`10 Cragg I at 262 (“The wire we used in this study transformed over a broad
`
`temperature range (25-38° C), which required flushing the introducing catheter
`
`with cold saline to minimize transformation of the wire in the catheter. We also
`
`used a 10-F Teflon introducing catheter to reduce friction of the partially
`
`transformed coil in the catheter.”) (emphasis added).
`
`21
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`instead remains in a stress-induced martensitic state due to SIM. Only upon
`
`deployment from the catheter is the stress relieved, allowing the SMA stent to self-
`
`expand due to the conversion of martensite to austenite and the inherent property
`
`of mechanical shape memory.
`
`51.
`
`This illustrates that even when cooling is used in medical device
`
`applications in the prior art, it does not disclose invoking thermal shape memory
`
`(i.e., thermally-induced martensite), but instead relies on the principles of stress-
`
`induced martensite and mechanical shape memory inherent in the selected SMA –
`
`exactly the same as what is claimed in the ’141 patent.
`
`C. The Widely Used SMA “Nitinol”
`
`52. Having provided an overview of SMAs generally, I will now focus on
`
`Nitinol, which is by far the most notable and widely used SMA. The shape-
`
`memory effects of Nitinol were discovered by William J. Buehler and Dr.
`
`Frederick E. Wang of the U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory in 1962.11 The word
`
`“Nitinol” in fact derives its name from “nickel-titanium Naval Ordnance
`
`Laboratory.” It has also been called several other names, including Tinel, Flexon,
`
`
`11 Kauffman et al., The Story of Nitinol: The Serendipitous Discovery of the
`
`Memory Metal and Its Applications, The Chemical Educator 1, Vol. 2:2, pp. 4-6
`
`(1996) (“Kauffman,” Exhibit 1027).
`
`22
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`and Ni-Ti, Ti-Ni, and simply nickel-titanium.
`
`53. Nitinol generally refers to a range of alloys containing nickel and
`
`titanium, usually in relatively equal amounts. The property features of the SMA
`
`have been well documented in the literature since well before 1983.12 Moreover,
`
`all prior art references that I have relied on for my analysis of the invalidity of the
`
`’141 Patent claims involve the use of SMAs that include Nitinol.
`
`54. Nitinol is widely used in part because in 1979 a leading researcher in
`
`the field of SMAs, Dr. L. McDonald Schetky, popularized the use of Nitinol in
`
`various commercial applications, including medical devices. In his article entitled
`
`Shape-Memory Alloys, which was published in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN – a widely
`
`circulated periodical at that time – Dr. Schetky discussed the use of Nitinol in
`
`space exploration, aircraft design, electrical connections, writing utensils, and
`
`medical devices, among others.13
`
`
`12 See, e.g., Frederick E. Wang et. al, The Irreversible Critical Range in the NiTi
`
`Transition, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 39:5, pp. 2166-2175 (April 1968)
`
`(Exhibit 1032); D.B. Chernov, et. al., The Multiplicity of Structural Transitions in
`
`Alloy Based on TiNi, Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 24:8, pp. 664-666 (August
`
`1979) (Exhibit 1023).
`
`13 See Schetky (Exhibit 1014) at 79.
`
`23
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1002, p. 25
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Ming H. Wu, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`55.
`
`Specifically related to medical devices, Schetky noted that “Nitinol
`
`does not react adversely with living tissue” and described using Nitinol to fasten
`
`artificial joints, facilitate the alignment of fractured bones, and filtering blood clots
`
`out of the circulatory system. As to a medical application intended for filtering
`
`clots, Schetky provided the following:
`
`Morris Simon of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston and the
`Harvard Medical School conceived the idea of fabricating a
`screenlike filter with a mesh size of about two millimeters from
`a continuous length of Nitinol wire. The wire can be
`straightened out when it is cooled below the martensite-
`transformation temperature, chosen to be well below body
`temperature. As the wire is chilled to maintain its straightened
`condition, it can be inserted through a catheter in an arm vein
`into the vena cava, the large vein that feeds into the heart. As
`the wire warms up it assumes the screenlike form. Experiments
`on dogs have been encouraging.14
`
`56.