throbber

`
`PHVSlClANS’
`DESK
`REFERENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`Supplement A
`
`For important errata, turn the page.
`
`IMPORTANT NOTICE
`’
`v
`-. Supplements to PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE are published twice yearly to provide readers with significant revisions of existing product listings as well as
`comprehensive information on new drugs and other products not included in the current annual edition. Before prescribing or administering any product
`described in PHYSICIANS“ DESK REFERENCE, be sure to consult this supplement to determine whether revisions have occurred since the 2000 edition of PDR went
`to press.
`
`Cowman 0 2000 and published by Medical Economics company-a1 Monivale. NJ 076451142. all rights reserved. None or the content oi this publication may be
`reproduced. stored In a retrieval system. resoid. redistributed. or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic. mechanical. photocopying. recording. or otherwise}
`Without the prior written permission oi the publisher. PHYSICiANS' DESK REFERENCES, 90%. PDR For Ophthalmologyiib. Pocket Penn. and The PDR® Family Gu'lde Io
`Prescription Drugem are registered trademarks used herein under license. FDR for Nonpreacnmion Drugs and Dietary Supplements”. PDRGD Medical Dictionary”. Pm
`Nurse's Drug Handbook“. Fons Nurse's Dimionary‘“. FDR Companion Guide”. PDR® for Herbal Medicines“. PDRiD'NIas 0! Anatomy. 111a PDFm Family Guide to
`Women's Health and Prescription Drugs“. PDRER' Electronic Library”. The PDR® Family Guide to Nutrition and Heaflh‘”.-Th-e PDRE Family Guide EncycloDEdla of Medical
`03'3"“. The PDR® Family Guide to Over-theCQuntai Drugs“ and The Pom; Family Guide to Natural Medicines endHealing ‘i'i1erapir-.-sIM are Irademarirs used herein
`under license.
`
`This supplement is a compilation of information submitted by the products' manufacturers. Each entry has been prepared, edited. and approved by the manufactur-
`er‘s medical department. medical director, and/or medical consultant. The publisher does not warrant or guarantee any of the products described herein or perform
`any independent analysis in connection with the product information contained herein.
`officers of Medical Economics company: : President and Chief Executhre Officer: Curtis B. Alien; Vice President. New Media: L Suzanne EeDeli: irrce President.
`Corporate Human Resources: Pan‘iela M. Bliash; Vice President and Chief Information Officer: Steven M. Bressier; ChiefFinancial Officer: Christopher Candi:
`Vice President and Controller: Barry Gray: Woe President. New Business Planning: Linda G. Hope: Woe President. name: Donna Santarpia: Senior W69 Wsident,
`Directory Services: Paul Walsh; Senior Vice President. Operations.- John R. Ware; Senior Vice President. Internet Strategies: Raymond Zoeller
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2046
`
`Amneal v. Endo
`
`|PR2014-00360
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2046
`Amneal v. Endo
`IPR2014-00360
`
`

`

`A248IORTHO-MC__NEIL
`
`PDR supplement,lA12000
` Topamax—Cont.
`
`HOW TO TAKE
`TOPfiMAXQ [Eplrsmats “finial SFHINKLE CAPSULES
`A Guide for Patients and Their Caregivers
`Your doctor has given. you a pracription for TOPAMAX®
`(toplramate capsules) Sprinkle Capsules. Here Ire your in-
`structions for takmg this medication. Please read these in-
`structions prior to use.
`To Take With Food
`You may sprinkle the
`contents of TOPAMAX®
`Sprinkle Capsules on a
`small amount (teaspoon)
`of soft
`food, such as
`applesauce, custard, ice
`cream, oatmeal, pud-
`ding, or yogurt.
`
`Hold the capsule up-
`right so that you can
`read the word "TOP”.
`
`{ll-
`
`
`
`bamazepine during adjunctive therapy with TOPAMAX®
`may require adjustment of the dose of TOPAMAX®. Be-
`cause of the bitter taste, tablets should not be broken.
`TOPAMAX®CHII Millikan Without regard to meals.
`_
`Adults {1? Years of Age and Owl
`The recommended total daily dose of TOPAMAX® as ad-
`junctlve therapy is 400 mgfdey in two divided doses. In
`studies of adults with partial onset seizures, 1: daily dose of
`200 mglday has inconsistent ell‘scla and is less effective than
`400 Insidey. Ills-recommended that therapyhe initiated at
`fill Inglday folloWed by titration to an efl'cctive dose. Daily
`doses'abovs 1,600 mg have not been studied.
`The recommended titration rate for topir'amste is:
`AM DOSE
`PM DOSE
`none
`50 mg
`Week 1
`so mg
`no mg
`Week 2
`50 mg
`ml] rug
`Week 3
`100 mg
`100 mg
`Week '4
`100 m
`”150 mg
`Week 5
`150 mg
`150 mg
`Week 6
`150 mg
`200 mg
`Week 1'
`son mg
`Week 8
`200 mg
`In the study of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures the
`initial titration rate was slower than in previous studies;
`the assigned dues-was reached at the end of 8 weeks (see
`CLINICAL STUDIES, Controlled Trials in Patients With
`Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures).
`Pediatric Patients Ages 2—16 Years
`The recommended tote] daily dose of 'I‘OI’AMAXG’ (hopin-
`mnte) as sdjunctive therapy is approximahly 5'to"9 my
`day in two divided doom. 'l‘itration'should begin at 25 mg (or
`less, based .011 a' range of 1 to 3 mg/kgi’dsy) nightly for the
`first week. The dosageshould then be increased at _1- or
`2-week interyals bylhcrementa 'an to 3' mgflrgfdny (admin«
`istered in twodivided doses)._to achieve optimal clinical re-
`sponse. Dose titration should be guided by clinical'oulcome.
`In the study of-primary generalised lonic-cionio seizures the
`initial titration rate Was slower than in firevious studies;
`the assigned dues 0115 was; was real: ed at the end of
`B weeks‘lsee'GmCA'L STUDIES, Controlled'l'riats In Ps-
`tionts With Primary Generalized Tonto-Glenlosslzuresl.
`Administration or TOPAMAXO'Sprlnlfio cannula
`TOPAMAX® (topiramate capsules) Sprinkle Capsules may
`he'swall'owe'd whole or may be administered by carofirlly
`opening the capsule and sprinkling the entire contents on o_
`smali'arnount (teaspoon) ofsoft l'oodi This drugll'ood mixture
`should be swallowed immediately aod'not chewed. It should
`not be stored for future use.
`'
`'
`'
`Patients with Renal Impairment:
`In renally impaired subjects (creatinine clearance less than
`70 mL/min/L73m2), one half of the usual adult dose is rec-
`ommended. Such patients will require a longer time to reach
`steady-state at each dose.
`Patients Undergoing Hsmodlslynls:
`'Ibp'irnmate is cleared by hemodinlysis stja rate that is 4 to
`6 times greater than a annual individual. Accordingly. a pro:
`longed period of dialysis may cause topirnmste ooneentre»
`tion to fell below that required to maintain an anti-seizure
`efl'c'cL To avoid rapid drops in topiramote plasma concentra-
`tion during hemodisjysis. a supplemental dose of topira-
`rnste my be required. The actual adjusts-sent should take
`into account 1) the duration ol’dielysis period, 2) the clear—
`once rate of the dialysis system being used. and 3) the efliec-
`tivo renal clearance of topiramate in the patient being dia-
`lyzed.
`Patients with Hepatic Disease:
`In hepaticully impaired patients topiramate plasma concen-
`trations may be increased. The mechanism is not well un-
`dorstood.
`HOW SUPPLIED
`
`Carefully twist off the
`clear portion of the cap-
`sule. You may find it
`best to do this over the
`small portion of the food
`onto which you will he
`pouring the sprinkles.
`
`Sprinkle all of the cap-
`sule’s contents onto a
`spoonful of soft
`food,
`taking care to see that
`the entire prescribed
`dosage is sprinkled onto
`the food.-
`
`sure the patient
`Be
`swallows
`the
`entire
`spoonful of the sprinkle!
`food mixture immedi-
`ately. Chewing should
`be avoided. It may be
`helpful to have the pa—
`tient drink fluids imme-
`diately in order to make
`sure all of the mixture is
`swallowed.
`IMPOR—
`TANT: Never store any
`sprinkle/food mixture
`for use at a later time.
`
`643-10445-2
`
`13‘
`
`
`
`
`
`To Take Without Food
`TOPAMAX® Sprinkle Capsules may also be swallowed as
`whole capsules.
`For more information about TOPAMAX® Sprinkle Cap-
`sules, ask your doctor or pharmacist.
`0MP DIVISION
`ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
`Raritan, NJ 08869
`© 0MP 1998
`Revised October 1999
`
`
`TOPAMAX® ltopiramutc) Tablets is available as debossed,
`coated. round tablets in the following strengths and colors:
`25 mg white (coded “TOP” on one side: '25” on the other)
`100 mgyellow (coded ”TOPAMAX" on one side; “100” on the
`other)
`.
`200 mg salmon (coded "POPAMAX’ on one elde; “200” on the
`other)
`They are supplied as follows:
`25 mg tablets—bottles of60 count with desiccant (NDC 0045- ULTRAM®
`0639—65)
`(tramadol hydrochloride tablets)
`100 mg tablets—bottles of 60 count with desiccant (NDC
`0045-0641455)
`'
`,
`'
`200 mg tablets—bottles of 60 count with desiccant (NDC
`0045-0642455)
`TOPAMAX® (topiramate capsules) Sprinkle Capsules con-
`tain small, white to ofl‘ white spheres. The gelatin capsules
`are white and clear.
`They are marked as follows:
`15 mg capstds with 'TOP' and ”15 mg" on the side
`25 mg capsule with ”TOP" and “9.5 mg" on the side
`The capsules are supplied as follows:
`15 mg capsules-bottles of SD lNDC flDdh-Dfidlvfifil
`25 mgcapsules~bottles of ED (NDC ONE-064565)
`TOI’MMXID ftopiremotel Tablets should be stored in tight-
`ly-olosed containers or. controlled room temperature, {59 to
`86°F. 15 In 30°C). Protect from moisture.
`TOPAMAX® {topirsmntc capsules) Sprinkle Capsules
`should be stored in tightly‘cloeod containers at or below
`25"0 (TWP). Protect from moisture.
`TOPAMAX® ltopiramate) and TOPAMAX® (topiramate
`capsules) are trademarks of Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.
`
`Prescribing infornmtion for this product, which appears on
`sugar 2218~2220 of the 2000 FDR, has been completely re-
`vised on fiillows. Please write ‘Soe Supplement A” next to the
`product flooding.
`Prescribing Information
`DESCRIPTION
`
`ULTRAM” ltramadol hydrochloride tablets} in a centrally
`acting analgesic. The chemical name for tramedol hydro‘
`chloride is [tleis-2-lldimethylaminolmothyll-l-{ii-mcth ox-
`yphenyl) cyclohexonol hydrochloride. its structural lbrmula
`15
`[See chemical structure at top of next column]
`The molecular weight of tramodol hydrochloride is 299.8.
`'l‘romedol hydrochloride is a white. hitter. crystalline and
`odorless powder. It is readily soluble in water and ethanol
`and has a pile of 9:41. The waterln-octanol partition cool’fi-
`dent is 1.35 at pH 7. ULTRAM tablets contain 50 mg oftre—
`medal hydrochloride and are white in color. Inactive ingre-
`dients in the tablet are corn starch, hydroxyprnpyl methyl-
`
`05":
`
`IHCI m I
`
`H He—N
`
`coo
`
`
`
`cellulose, lactose, magnesium stearate, microcryatalline
`cellulose, polyethylene glycol, polysorhate 80, sodium Starch
`glycolate, titanium dioxide and wax.
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Pharmacodynamics
`ULTRAM is a centrally acting synthetic analgesic 00m-
`pound. Although its mode of action is not completelyunday.
`stood, from animal
`tests. at least two complementary
`mechanisms appear applicable: binding of parent and .MJ
`metabolite to propioid receptors and wool: inhibition of re.
`uptake of norapinephrine and Serotonin. Opioid activity is
`due to both low afiinity binding ofthe parent compound and
`higher affinity binding of the 0-deni'ethylated metabolite
`M1 to p-opioid receptors. In animal models. M1 loop to 3
`times more potent than tramadol 'aniroducingionalge'sia
`and 200 times more potent in p-opioi binding. Wol—
`ioduced analgesia is only partially antagonized by the opiJ
`ete antagonist noloutone in several animal .tests."1'he rela~
`live contribution of both tramadol and MI. to human anal-
`gesio is dependent upon the plasma concentrations ofeaeh
`compound (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacoki~
`notice).
`..
`Tramsdol has been shown to inhibit reuptakeof col-epi-
`nophrino and serotonin in uilm. as have some other opioid
`[analgesics Those mechanism may. contribute indepen-
`dently to the overall analgesic profile of.ULTRAM finslge
`sis in humans begins approximately within onshourul'tor
`administration and reaches-a peak in approximately two to
`three hours.
`
`Apart Erom analgesia. UL'I'RAM administration may pro-
`duce a constellation ofsympmms (including dizziness, som-
`nolenoe. nausea. mustipation, sweating and pros-ibis] simi-
`lar to that of an opioid. However, unmade! causes less tes-
`piratnry depression than morphine at reubmmeudedfiosea
`(see OVERDOSAGE). In contrast to morphine, tramadol
`has not been shown to eeunehiatamine release. At therapeu-
`tic doscs, ULTRAM has no effect on heart rate, left-ventric-
`ular Emotion or cardiac index. Urthostelic hypbtenaion has
`been observed.
`Pharmaookinetifi
`.
`The analgesic activity of ULTRAM is due to both parent
`drug and the M1 metabolite (see CLINICAL PHARMACOL—
`OGY, Pharmacodynamics). Tramadol is administered as a
`racemate and both the [—1 and [+] forms of both tramadol
`and M1 are detected in the circulation. Tramadol is well ab-
`sorbed orally with an absolute hioavailability of 1.5%. Tra-
`madol has 'a volume of distribution ofapproxirnstely'dflls’kg
`and is only son bouodto plasma proteins. Tramsdol is a:-
`teosively metabolized by a number-of pathways, including
`CYP2D3 and CYP3A4. as well as by conjugation of parent
`and metabolites. One metabolite. M1. is phermacologiailly
`active in animal models; The {emotion of M1 is'dependont
`upon Cytochrome P450l2D3) and as such is subject to-both
`metabolic induction and inhibition which may client the
`therapeutic response (see PRECAUTIONS—Drug Interac-
`tions}. “unmade-l and its metabolites are exacted primarily
`in the urine with observed plasma half-lives of 5.3 and 'lA
`hours for tramadol and M1, respectively. Linear pharmaco-
`kinetics hevebeen observed following multiple doses of 60
`and 100 mg to steady-state.
`Absorption:
`Racernic tramadol is rapidly and almost completely ab-
`sorbed afier oral administration. The mean absolute bio-
`availability of a 100 mg oral dose is approximately 7.5%..Thc
`mean peak plasma ooncontrsfion of racemic tramadol and
`M1 occurs at two and three hours. respectively..sher admin-
`istration in healthy'adulls. In general, both enmtiomera of
`tremadol and M1 follow a parallel time course in the body
`following single and multiple doses although small diderv
`sores (“41096) exist in the absolute mount of each enactin-
`mer present.
`Steadystate plasma concentrations of both tramadol and
`M1 are achieved within two days with q.i.d. dosing. There is
`no evidence of self-induction (see Figure 1 and Table 1 be-
`low).
`[See figure 1 at top of next page}
`[See table I at bottom of next pagel
`Food Efi’ectsr Oral administration of ULTRAM with food
`does not significantly affect its rate or extent of absorption,
`therefore, ULTRAM can be administered without regard to
`food.
`Distribution.-
`The volume of distribution of tramadol was 2.6 and 2.9 1i—
`teral‘lsg in male and female subjects. respectively, lollowing s
`100 mg intravenous dose. The binding oi‘trsmadol to human
`plasma proteins is approximately 20% end binding also ap-
`pears to be independent of concentration up a: ll] uglmL.
`Saturation ol'ploamn protein binding occurs only at ounoon-
`trulions outside the clinically relevant range. Although not
`confirmed in humans, trsmadol has been shown in rats to
`cross the blood-brain barrier.
`Metabolism:
`Tramadol is extensively metabolized afier oral administra-
`tion. Approximately 30% of the dose is excreted in the urine
`as unchanged drug, whereas 60% of the dose is excreted as
`
`

`

`
`
`--l-— llamadfl
`(mum
`—-—— 11m
`snore-so
`
`
`m
`
`no
`
`
`“'0
`
`
`lw
`names-o
`
`----- in)
`
`W“!
`
`
`0
`
`I!
`
`24
`1am an
`
`ill
`
`metaboliws. The remainder is excreted either as unidenti-
`fiedor aszaunextrsdshle metabolites. The major metabolic
`pathways appear to be N- and O-demethylation and lucu~
`mnidation or'.'sulfation' in the liver. Oneimatsbolitel
`ea-
`mcthyltrsmadol. denoted M1] is pherms'celopicslly active in
`animal models. Production of M1 is dependent on the
`SCYPZDE ieosezyme ol‘_
`roe 13—450 and as such is sub-
`ject-to both metabolic-induction and inhibition which may
`afoot the therapeutic response (see PREGAUTIONEDmg
`Interaction).
`Approximately 7% of the population has reduced activity of
`the CW6 tenancy-me of cyooclwome-P—Ilfiu. Those indi»
`viduals are ‘poor metaboliscre' of debrisoqifine. dextro-
`methorpbao. tricyclic antidepressants, among other drugs.
`Afici- s single oral dose oil's-smsdol. concentrations oftra-
`madol were only slightly higher in ‘poor metabolism-8' ver-
`sus “extensive minsboliam-e". '
`'
`‘
`
`Gmnfi'sueh'aa fluesetine and its metabolite norfluo'creh‘ne.
`emitriptyline and quinidine inhibit the metabolism of-i:rn«
`model to various dayees.'suggesting'that.90mniitant ad'
`ministration ofthsee compounds omild result in increases'in
`trainsdol' concentrations and. decreased concentrations of
`M1. The phaidnaoologicsl impact of these alterations in
`terms of either eficacy .or safety is unknown.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8PMDlsoonllnulng E
`
`
`15
`‘0
`DayllnDoufle-Bhnd
`
`un I nU'IVIVIILII.’ rib-r9
`
`PDR Supplement A/2000
`‘ Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAsl. and other tricyclic com-
`ULTRAM has been studied in three loopterm controlled tri-
`pounds le.g., cyclobenzaprine, promethazine, etc), or
`Moon 'l‘rmnadol and M1 Plasma {lonocnlmtion
`figure 1:
`als involving a total of 820 patients. with 530 patients re-_
`' Opioids.
`Profiles after a Single mo mg Ore] Dose and af-
`oeiving ULT'RAM. Patients with o variety of chronic painful
`Administration of ULTRAM may enhance the seizure risk in
`ter 'Dzventy—Nine 100 mg Oral Doses ofTromadol
`conditions were studied in double-blind trials of one to three
`patients taking:
`H01 given q.i.d.
`WARNINGS—Use with MAO In-
`months duration. Average dolly doses of approximately 250
`' MAO inhibitors (see also
`hibitorsl.
`mg ofUL'I'RAM in divided doses were generally comparable
`to five doses of acetaminophen 30E} rogwith codeine phos-
`0 Naurnleptlcs. or
`phate 30 mg (MENDL‘ with Codeine #3) daily, llvo doses
`0 Other drugs that reduce the seizure threshold.
`of aspirin 325 mg with codeine phosphate 30 mg daily. or
`Risk oi convulsions may also increase in patients with en-
`two to three doses of acetaminophen 590 mg with oxycodone
`llepsy. those with a hlstory of seizures. or in patients with a
`hydrochloride ii mg lTYLOX‘”) daily.
`recognized risk tor seizure lsuch as head trauma. metabolic
`Tilratlon Trials
`disorders. alcohol and drug withdrawal. CNS infections}. In
`in a randomized. blinded clinical study with 129 to 132 pa-
`ULTRAM overdose, naloxone administration may increase
`the risk of seizure.
`tients per group. a 10-day titration to a dolly ULTRAM dose
`of 200 mg (50 mg q.i.d.J. attained in 50 mg increments aver-y
`Ansphylactold Reactions
`3 days. was found to result in fewer discontinuation due to
`Serious and rarely fatal snaphyloetnid reactions haw: been
`dissineso or vertigo than titration over only 4 days or en ti-
`reported in patients receiving therapy with UIJI‘RAM.
`tration. lo a second study with 54 to 59 patients per group.
`These reactions often occur following the first. dose. Other
`patients who had nausea or vomiting when titrated over 4
`reported reactions include pruritus. hives. bronchospasm.
`days were randomised to re-initiate ULTRAM therapy using
`and angioedemn. Patients with a history of anephyluctoid
`slower titration rates. A 16-day titration schedule. starting
`reactions to codeine and other opinids may be at increased
`with 25 mg qAM and using additions] doses in 25 mg incre-
`risk and therefore should not receive ULTRAM (see CON-
`ments every third day to 100 mp’dsy (25 rag q.i.d.}. followed
`TRAINDICATIONS).
`by 50 mg increments in the total daily dose every third day
`Use In Opioid-dependant Patlanur
`to 201} mafday (50 mg q.i.d.l. resulted in fewer discontinue-
`ULTRAM ”should not be used in opioiddependont patients.
`tines due to nausea
`or vomiting and footer disconfinuefions
`ULTRAM has been shown to reinitiate physical dependence
`did a 10-day titration schedule.
`due to any cause than
`in some patients that have been previously dependent on
`other opioids. Cooaeq _
`tip, in patients laid: a tondoncy to
`opioid abuse or opioid dependence.
`treatment with
`ULTRAM is not recommended.
`Uaowi'th CNS Depressants
`ULTRAM should be used with caution and in reduced dos-
`ages when administered to
`tionle' receiving-CNS depres-
`seats such as alcohol. opioi
`. anesthetic agents; phoned-ii-
`asides. tranquilizers or sedative hypnotics.
`Use with MAO Inhibitors
`Use; ULTRAM with great caution in ps'tienhi'toking mono-
`amiue oxidase inhibitors, Because animal studies have
`shown increased deaths with combined administration.
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`Respiratory Bopresslon
`
`with anesthetic medications err-alcohol. respira-
`tory depression may result 'li'eat such cases as so
`.
`Ifnalonooe is to he administered. use cautiously because it
`may precipitate ssisures (seeWARNWGS. Seizure Risk and
`OVERDOSAGE).
`Increased Ina-scrapie! Pressure or Head Trauma
`ULTRAM should he used with caution in patients with ire
`creased intracranial pressure 'or head injury. Papillary
`changes (mioais) from trsrnudol may obscure die existence.
`extent, or course ofintrecr'anial pstlmlogy. Clirdcians should
`also maintains high index of suspicion for sdversedrug re-
`action when evaluating altered mental status in these pa-
`tients if they are reeeising norm.
`Acute Abdominal Conditions
`The administration ofULTRAM may complicate the clinical
`assessment of patients with acute abdominal conditions.
`Withdrawal
`'
`Withdrawal symptoms may occur if ULTRAMj’ (trumadol
`hydrochloride tablets} is discontinued abruptly These symp-
`toms may includsr'anidety. sweating. insomnia. rigors. pain.
`nausea. homers, diarrhoea. upper respiratory symptoms.
`Continued on next page
`
`'I‘lie'mean terminal plasma elimination half-lives oft-anemic
`madolandraoemich are 3.3 1 1.4 and’i'A : 1.4 hours.
`respeeiiVely The plasma elimination hallilifeofraoemic tra»
`medal increased from approximately six hours to seven
`hours upon multiple dosing.
`Special l’opulnlona
`Renal:
`_
`lmpsirsdrenal function results in a decreased rate and en-
`tont of emotion of unmade] and its active metabolite. M1.
`In
`fiesta with crestinins clearances of less than 30
`Int-gm.adiusenvnt oftha deems regimen ismmmmandeci
`(soeDQSAGE ANDADWISTRATION). The total amount
`oftramsdol and M1 removed during a 4-hour dialysis period
`is lengthen 7% of the-administered dose.
`ego
`.
`Metabolism ofh‘amadol and Mlis reduced in patients with
`sdsanoed cirrhosis of the liver. resulting in both a larger
`area under the concentration time curve for trainsan and
`lingers-emetic) and M1 elimination half-lives (13 lira. for
`Table 1
`trnmhdnl and 19 hrs. for M1). In eii'rhotic patients. adjust-
`maul; ofths dosh): regimen is recommended (nee DOSAGE
`Mean (“/oCV) Pharmaeokinetic Parameters for
`AND ADMINISTRATION).
`'
`Racemic Tramadol and M1 Metabolite
`Ass:
`.
`
`
`Healthy elderly subjects aged 65 to 15 years have plasma
`tm (hrs)
`Population]
`Clearance/Fb
`Parent Drug/
`trsmadol concentrations and. elimination half-lives comps-
`
`Dosage Regimen“
`Metabolite
`(mllmin/Kg)
`
`rsble to those observed in healthy subjects less than 65
`
`
`years of age. In so '
`ts over ‘15 years. mexhnum oer-Inn
`592 (30)
`2.3 (61)
`5.90 (25)
`Healthy Adults,
`Tramadol
`6.7 (15)
`
`
`wooenusfiona are a glitly elevated (203 vs. 182 nyml.) and
`100 mg qid.
`110 (29)
`2.4 (46) — 7.0 (14)
`MD p.o.
`M1
`the-elimination h'slf-life‘ls‘slightly prolonBEd (7 vs. 6 hours)
`._
`\to sohjeots 651.0 ’15 years ofnge. Adjustment of
`
`the daily dose is recommended for patients older than 75
`Healthy Adults.
`1— Tramadol
`308 (25)
`1.6 (63)
`8.50 (31)
`5.6 (20)
`
`steers (see DOSAGE AND nDIflNIS'I'RATIONJ.
`100 mg
`SD p.o.
`M1
`55.0 (36)
`3.0 (51)
`c
`6.7 (16)
`
`The absolute bioevailability of tramsdol was 1'39!» inmales
`Tramadol
`208 (31)
`2.1 (19)
`6.89 (25)
`7.0 (23)
`Geriatric,
`and 19%;
`in females: The plasma clearance was 3.4
`
`mIJminikg in males and 5.7 mIJniinfkg infem‘slee following
`(>75 yrs)
`50 mg SD p.o.
`M1
`(1
`d
`c
`d
`all!!! mg N done of iramadol. Following a oingl'e oral dose.
`ond'after sdiusting for body weight. females had n 12%
`
`Hepatic Impaired,
`Tramadol
`217 (11)
`1.9 (16)
`4.23 (56)
`13.3 (11)
`higher peak tramadol concentration and s 35% higher area
`under theooncootrstion-time curve oompered to males. The
`50 mg
`SD p.o.
`MI
`19.4 (12)
`9.8 (20)
`c
`18.5 (15)
`clinical significance of'this difi‘ere'oco is urilmo'im.
`Clinical Studies
`
`Renal Impaired.
`’l‘ramadol — ' c
`4.23 (54)
`10.6 (31)
`ULTRAM has been given in single oral doses of 50.25. 100.
`150 and son mg to patients with pmn_fohowin£_$urgiosl pru-
`CLcr 10-30 mIJmin
`100 mg SD i.v.
`M1
`0
`c
`c
`11.5 (40)
`cedoros and pain following oral surgery (extraction of im-
`
`pacted molars}.
`_
`_
`.
`_
`Renal Impaired,
`Tramadol
`c
`c
`3.73 (17)
`11.0 (29)
`1n single-dose models of pain'foilowing oral surgery. pain ro-
`h‘cf was demonstrated in some patients at dosesol' fill mg
`CLC,<5 mL/Inin
`J___
`100 mg SD i.v.
`M1
`0
`c
`c
`16.9 (18)
`of 100 mg ULTRAM tended to provide
`
`analgesia superior to-oodeine sulfate 60 mg. but it was not
`MD = Multiple dose. p.o. = Dru] administration.
`3 SD 2: Single dose.
`deinephosphsta 60 mg In amgledosc models ofpain follow-
`i.v. = Intravenous administration. qid s Four times daily
`mg surgical
`. um. 150 mg provided analgesia geocr:
`b i" represents the oral bioavailsbility of tramsdol
`allycompara
`to the mbina'tion of '
`'eophsm .650
`
`series 100 ms. with a tendency c Not'spplic'ahle
`d Not measured
`
`
`
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`ULTRAM is indicated for the management of moderate to
`moderately severe pain.
`cow'raammcas'losa
`ULTRAM should not beadministered to patients who have
`previously demonstrated hypersensitivity to tramadol. any
`other component of this product or opioids. It'is also contra-
`indicated in cases of‘acute intoxication with alcohol. hypnot-
`:1).chlll centrally acting analgesics. opioida or psychotropic
`gs.
`WARNINGS
`
`Seizures have been reported in patients receiving ULTMM
`within the recommended dosage range. Spontaneous
`post-merketlng reports Indicate that seizure rial: Is In-
`creased with doses of ULTRA”! shove the recommended
`range. Concomitant use of ULTHAM influence the seizure
`risk in patients taking:
`0 Sole'cfiua motorfin "uptake inhibitors (SSRI antidepres-
`sants or anorectiosl,
`
`
`
`

`

`ALOUIUH l HU-MUNEIL
`
`Ultram—Cont.
`
`Use with Digoxin and Warforin
`Post-marketing surveillance has revealed rare reports of di!
`goxin toxicity'and alteration of warfarin elfect, including el-
`piloerection, and rarely hallucinations. Clinical experience
`evation of protllrombin times.
`suggests that withdrawal symptoms may be relieved by ta-
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis. lln airmen: of Fartillty
`pering the medication.
`Tramadol was not mutagenic in‘
`e followin assays: Ames
`Patients Physically Dependent on Opioids
`Salmonella microsomal activation toot, CH HPET mam-
`ULTRAM is not recommended for patients who are depen-
`malian cell assay, mouse lymphoma assay (in the absence of
`dent on opioids. Patients who have recently taken substan-
`metabolic activation), dominant lethal mutation tests in
`mice, chromosome aberration test in Chinese hamsters, and
`tial amounts 0f opioids may experience withdrawal symp-
`bone marrow microuucleus tests in mice and Chinese ham-
`toms. Because-of the dilficulty in assessing dependence in
`patients-who have previously received substantial amounts
`sters. Weakly mutagenic results occurred in the presence of
`of opioid medication, administer ULTRAM cautiously to
`metabolic activation in the mouse lymphoma assay and mi-
`such patients.
`cronuclaua test in rats. Overall, the weight of evidence from
`Use in Renal and Hepatic Disease
`these tests indicates that tramadol does 'not pose a genotoxic
`risk to humans.
`Impaired renal function results in a decreased rate and ex-
`tent of excretion of tramadol and its active metabolite, M1.
`A slight, but statistically significant, increase in two com-
`In patients with creatinine clearances of less than 30
`mon murine tumors, pulmonary and hepatic, was observed
`mIJmin, dosing reduction is recommended (see DOSAGE
`in a mouse carcinogenicity study, particularly in aged mice
`AND ADMINISTRATION).
`(dosing orally up to 30 mg/kg for approximately two years,
`although the study was not done with the Maximum ’lhler-
`Metabolism of tramadol and M1 is reduced in patients with
`ated Dose). This finding is not believed to suggest risk in
`advanced cirrhosis of the liver. In-drrhoIic-pafianta. dosing
`reduction is recommended (see DOSAGE AND ADMINIS.
`humans. No such finding occurred in a rat carcinogenicity
`TRATION).
`study.
`With the prolonged half-life in these conditions, achieve-
`No effects on fertility were observed for tramadol at oral
`ment of steady-state is delayed, so that it may take several
`dose levels up to 50 mg/kg in male rats and 75 mg/kg in
`female rats.
`days for elevated plasma concentrations to develop.
`Information for Patients
`Pregnancy, Thratogenic Efi'ects: Playmate)! Category C
`0 ULTRAM may impairmental or physical abilities required There
`are lie-adequatean'd well-controlled studies in preg‘
`for the performance of potentially hazardous tasks such as
`nent women.‘ ULTRAM should be used during pregnancy
`driving a car or operating machinery.
`only if the potsntial'beneiltjuatifies the potential risk to the
`fetus.
`0 ULTRAM should not be taken with alcohol containing
`beverages.
`’I‘ramadol has been shown to be embryotoxic and fetotoxic in
`mice, rats and rabbits at maternally toxic doses 3 to 15
`' ULTRAM should he used with caution when taking medi-
`cations such as tranquilizers, hypnotics or other opiate
`times the maximum human dose or higher (120 mg/kg in
`containing analgesics.
`_
`mice. 25
`or bighar in rats and 75 mg/kg or higher in
`0 The patient should be instruclcd to inform the physician if
`rabbits); but was not torstogenic at these dose levels. No
`harm to the fetus due to tramadol was seen at doses that
`they are pregnant, think they might becomcpregrmnt, or
`are trying to become pregnant (see PRECAUTIONS: La-
`were not maternally toxic.
`bor and Delivery).
`No drug—related teratogenic effects were observed in prog—
`0 The patient should understand the single-dose and 24-
`eny of mice, rats or rabbits treated with tramadol by various
`hour dose limit and the time interval between doses, since
`routes (up to 140 mg/kg for mice, 80 mg/kg for rats or 300
`exceeding these recommendations can result in respira-
`mg/kg for rabbits). Embryo and fetal toxicity consisted pri-
`tory depression and seizures.
`marily of decreased fetal weights, skeletal ossification and
`Drug Interactions
`increased-supernumorory ribs at maternally toxic dose lev-
`Tramadol does not appear to induce its own metabolism in
`els. 'l‘ron'sient delays in developmental or behavioral param-
`humans, since observed maximal plasma concentrations af-
`eters were also seen in pups froinrst dams allowed to de-
`ter. multiple oral dosesaro higher than expected based on
`liver. Embryo and fetal lethality were reported only in one
`rabbit study at 300 mg/kg, a dose that would cause extreme
`single-dose data. 'ltamodol is amild inducer of selected drug
`metabolism pathways measured in animals.
`maternal toxicity in the rabbit.
`Use with Carbamazepine
`In peri- and post—natal studies in rats, progeny of dams re-
`Concomitant administration of ULTRAM with carbamaze-
`ceiving oral (garage) dose levels of'bl) mgfkg or'graatcr had
`pine causes a significant increase in tramadol metabolism,
`decreased weights, and pup survival was decreased early in
`lactation at 80 mgfkg (6' to 10 times the maximum human
`presumably Lluough metabolic induction by corbamonapine.
`Patients receiving chronic mrbamaeepino doses of up to 800
`dose). No toxicity was observed for progeny of dams receiv—
`mg daily may require up to twice the recommended dose of
`ing 8, 1t}, 20, 25 or 40 Ingfirg. Maternal toxicity was observed
`ULTRAM.
`at all dose levels, but «floats on progeny were evident only at
`Use with Quinidine
`higher dose levels where maternal toxicity was more severe.
`Labor and Delivery
`'I‘ramadol is metabolized to M1 by the CYP2D6 P-450 isoen-
`zyme. Ouinidine is a selective inhibitor of that isoenzyme, so
`ULTRAM should not be used in pregnant women prior to or
`that concomitant administration of quinidine and ULTRAM
`during labor unless the potential benefits outweigh the
`results in increased concentrations of tramadol and reduced
`risks. Safe use in pregnancy has not been established.
`concentrations of M1. The clinical consequences of these find-
`Chronic useduring pregnancy may lead to physical depen-
`ings are unknown. In vitro drug interaction studies in hu-
`dence and postpartlm: W'ifltdl‘aWal symptoms in the new-
`man liver microsomes indicate that tramadol has no efl'ect on
`born. 'I'ram‘adol has been shown to cross the placenta. The
`quinidine metabolism.
`mean ratio of serum tramadol in the umbilical veins com-
`Use with Inhibitors of CYP2D6
`pared to maternal veins was 0.83 for 40 women given tra-
`In vitro drug interaction studies in human liver microsomes
`madol during labor.
`indicate that concomitant administration with inhibitors of
`The effect of ULTRAM, if any, on the later growth, develop-
`ment, and functional maturation of the child is unknown.
`CYP2D6 such as fluoxetine, paroxetine, and amitriptyline
`could result in some inhibition of the metabolism of trama-
`Nursing Mothers
`dol.
`UL

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket