throbber
Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing
`of the USP Dissolution Apparatus 2
`(Rotating Paddle) Using Modified
`Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablets: Proof of Principle
`John Mauger1, John Ballard2, Robert Brockson2,
`Sinjan De3, Vivian Gray4, and Dennis Robinson3
`
`email correspondence to: jmauger@deans.pharm.utah.edu
`
`Introduction
`
`K nowledge of operating variables for a dissolution
`
`apparatus is important to the pharmaceutical scientist
`interested in product development,quality assurance,
`and research applications. The dissolution performance of
`USP Apparatus 1 and 2 is dependent on both convection
`and diffusion as coupled dissolution mechanisms. The sensi-
`tivity and variability of the data may be compromised when
`either the convection or diffusion mechanism dominates.
`When convection dominates,there may be a loss of sensi-
`tivity. For example,Hamlin et al.,(1) demonstrated a loss of
`sensitivity in distinguishing real differences in dissolution
`rates due to increasing agitation intensity. When diffusion is
`the predominant mechanism,the dissolution results are
`affected by density gradients and may vary considerably (2,
`3). USP Apparatus 1 and 2 depend on a balance between
`these two mechanisms in order to produce sensitive and
`reproducible data.
`Experimental dissolution methods that employ configu-
`rations linked with convective-diffusion models,such as
`the rotating disk or the stationary disk,are useful to under-
`stand the relationship between the diffusion and convec-
`tive mechanisms. The dissolution rates determined from
`either of these two experimental methods are often
`termed “intrinsic dissolution rates”. Intrinsic dissolution
`rates have been defined as “the rate of dissolution of a pure
`pharmaceutical active ingredient when conditions such as
`surface area,temperature,agitation or stirring speed,pH,
`and ionic strength of the dissolution medium are kept con-
`stant”(4).
`This research was motivated by previous studies (2,3)
`that suggested the possibility of using modified salicylic
`acid calibrator tablets supplemented by visualization stud-
`ies (5) as a method to evaluate the intrinsic dissolution per-
`formance of USP Apparatus 2. Intrinsic dissolution perfor-
`mance in this context is the intrinsic dissolution rate due to
`the inherent convection and diffusion mechanisms that
`govern dissolution for a given apparatus. The premise for
`the current study is that these dissolution rates provide a
`framework for evaluating the dissolution performance of
`USP Apparatus 2.
`
`Therefore,the goals of this study were to:
`
`1) Demonstrate the usefulness of a simple visual analy-
`sis technique.
`2) Characterize the variability associated with the disso-
`lution data for USP Apparatus 2.
`3) Test the premise that USP Apparatus 2 operates with-
`in a convective-diffusion model that explains the
`relationship between dissolution rate and stirring
`speed as well as other hydrodynamic and fluid
`mechanical factors.
`4) Demonstrate that the convective-diffusion model
`reflects an accurate picture of the physicochemical
`aspects of dissolution within the micro environmen-
`tal region at the tablet surface.
`
`While prednisone and salicylic acid calibrators have been
`used since 1978 in connection with apparatus suitability test-
`ing,these tests are aimed primarily at demonstrating the
`influence of perturbations such as vibration (6,7).This study
`will focus on the use of modified USP Salicylic Acid Calibrator
`Tablets as a method to characterize the intrinsic dissolution
`performance characteristics of USP Apparatus 2 within the
`framework of a convective-diffusion model that explains the
`influence of stirring speed,the underlying fluid mechanical
`factors,and the diffusional and physicochemical parameters.
`
`Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing
`An intrinsic dissolution test should not only be based on
`a convective-diffusion model,but also on previous knowl-
`edge of the actual fluid flow regime relevant to the appara-
`tus. Previous research reported by Bocagnegra et al. (8)
`demonstrated the use of laser Doppler anemometry in
`characterizing the three-dimensional fluid flow compo-
`nents in USP Apparatus 2. Of singular interest is the finding
`that close to the bottom of the vessel of this apparatus,the
`tangential component of flow dominates and approxi-
`mates solid body rotation. This finding implies that the
`intrinsic dissolution properties of this apparatus may be
`predictable within the framework of a fluid mechanics-
`based dissolution model that incorporates and couples the
`convective and diffusion mechanisms.
`
`1 Corresponding author,University of Utah,College of Pharmacy,30 South 2000 East,Rm.
`201,Salt Lake City,UT 84112-5820,jmauger@deans.pharm.utah.edu
`2 DuPont Pharmaceuticals,Greenville,DE
`
`3 College of Pharmacy,986000 Nebraska Medical Center,Omaha,NE,68198
`4 V.A.Gray Consulting,Inc.,9 Yorkridge Trail,Hockessin,DE 19707
`
`6 Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2023
`Amneal v. Endo
`IPR2014-00360
`
`

`

`The fluid mechanical component of dissolution is repre-
`sented by the dimensionless Reynolds number,which is
`the ratio of inertial to frictional forces (9) where:
`1) Re = U r/ν
`The representative fluid velocity is given by U (cm/sec),ν
`is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid at a given tempera-
`ture (cm2/sec) and r is the dimension of a physical body
`over which the fluid is flowing,say the radius of a tablet
`(cm). This relationship shows that the Reynolds number is
`directly proportional to the fluid velocity and inversely pro-
`portional to the kinematic viscosity.
`The convective-diffusion component of dissolution is
`represented by the dimensionless Peclet number (9):
`
`2) Pe = U r/D
`
`where U and r are previously defined and D is the diffu-
`sion coefficient (cm2/sec) of the drug.
`For a rotating disk in an unstirred fluid,or a stationary
`disk in a rotating fluid,the Reynolds and Peclet numbers
`are modified to include the radius of the disk (r,in cm) and
`the rotational rate of the disk (ω,in radians/sec):
`3) Re = r2ω/ν and Pe = r2ω/D
`For the rotating disk,the dimensionless Reynolds and
`Peclet numbers are related to the dissolution rate per unit
`surface area,J,by:
`
`4) J = 0.62 (D/r) (Re)1/2 (Pe/Re)1/3 Cs
`
`where Cs (g/cm3) is the saturation solubility at a given
`temperature. The relationship given by equation 4 is pre-
`dictive and contains information concerning the convec-
`tive and diffusional components of the intrinsic dissolution
`properties. Furthermore,it is based on a fluid mechanics
`model for a rotating disk in an unstirred fluid (9,pp. 60-71).
`Given the findings of Bocanegra et al. (6) the fluid flow at
`the bottom of the USP Apparatus 2 is approximated by a
`model for a rotating fluid over a stationary disk. This system
`has been studied in connection with engineering and
`pharmaceutical applications (10,11,and 12). Colton and
`Smith (10) gave the following relationship for the dissolu-
`tion rate per unit area when averaged over the surface of
`the disk,,where:
`5) 〈J〉 = 0.77 (D/r) (Re)1/2 γ1/2 (Pe/Re)1/3 Cs.
`The stationary disk is similar to the rotating disk model
`since it is predictive and includes both the convective and
`diffusional components contributing to the dissolution
`rate. However,there are important differences related to
`
`the direction of fluid flow on the dissolution surface. With
`the rotating disk configuration,fluid flows outward from
`the center of the disk and the disk is uniformly accessible
`across the dissolving surface. With the stationary disk con-
`figuration,the dissolving surface is not uniformly accessi-
`ble to dissolution as the fluid sweeps from the leading
`outer edge to the center of the tablet. According to Colton
`and Smith (10) approximately 80% of the mass transport
`occurs in the outer 20% of the tablet area.
`With the stationary disk,a plume forms at the center of the
`tablet as the fluid and dissolved material exits from the tablet
`surface upward toward the center of the paddle blade.The
`three-dimensional fluid flow profiles associated with the sta-
`tionary disk have been described by Schlicting (13).
`Another differing characteristic between the rotating
`and stationary disks is the γ term,which is a dimensionless
`ratio of the representative fluid velocity at some axial dis-
`tance below the paddle to the maximum paddle tip veloci-
`ty. Below the paddle and just above the surface of the dis-
`solution vessel,the fluid velocity is expected to be less than
`the paddle tip velocity and greater than zero,resulting in a
`ratio bounded between zero and one. In keeping with this
`expectation,the data from the study by Bocanegra et al. (8)
`indicates that for the USP Apparatus 2,this ratio is approxi-
`mately 0.4 in the vicinity of the dissolving surface below
`the stirring source.
`This experimentally determined value is dependent
`upon the radial distance from the center of the vessel and
`approaches zero under two conditions:1) at the center of
`the vessel,in keeping with the solid body rotation model
`where V = ωr and 2) at the surface of the vessel due to fric-
`tional forces.
`Equations 4 and 5 were tested in the present study as a
`basis for an intrinsic dissolution performance test in USP
`Apparatus 2.The test was undertaken using modified USP
`Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablets that were coated on the rim
`and one side with a water impervious shellac,with the
`uncoated surface facing the paddle. These tablets present a
`constant surface area for dissolution during the experiment.
`
`Experimental
`Materials— Tablets for the visualization studies were
`prepared by blending a known weight of salicylic acid,
`Sigma Chemicals Lot #70K002451,with 3% by weight of
`phenolphthalein,Sigma Chemicals Lot #30K1353. Previous
`studies showed that this concentration of phenolphthalein
`was sufficient to give a clear visualization of the dissolution
`process at the surface of the tablet without flooding the
`bulk solution with color. Three hundred milligrams of this
`
`Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`7
`
`

`

`Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing … continued
`
`blend was compressed into a tablet using 0.5 metric tons
`of pressure for 30 seconds with a Carver press. These
`tablets were used for the visualization studies after inspec-
`tion for chipping and surface imperfections. The diameter
`and thickness of these tablets approximated USP calibrator
`tablets.
`USP Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablets,Lot N,300 mg,were
`coated on one side and around the rim with water impervi-
`ous shellac that contained as the primary ingredient
`toslyamide epoxy resin. These tablets were used in the
`intrinsic dissolution study.
`Visualization Studies – Visualization studies were per-
`formed using commercially available dissolution equip-
`ment,(VanKel),USP Apparatus 1 and 2. The visualization
`studies were performed under conditions of no agitation
`and at 25,50,and 100 rpm in 900 ml of sodium hydroxide
`solution of known concentration at 37ºC. Salicylic acid
`tablets containing phenolphthalein were placed in the ves-
`sels containing sodium hydroxide solution and the dissolu-
`tion process was visualized by observing the color at the
`surface of the tablet as dissolution of the salicylic acid and
`phenolthalein blend occurred in the alkaline solution. Pho-
`tographs were then taken between 1 and 10 minutes after
`placing the tablet in the dissolution medium.
`Dissolution Studies - Dissolution studies were performed
`on commercially available dissolution equipment,
`(VanKel),USP Apparatus 2. Test conditions were consistent
`with USP <711> Apparatus System Suitability require-
`ments. The intrinsic dissolution studies were performed
`using the USP Calibrator Tablet procedure,with 900 mL of
`0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) as the medium. The sam-
`pling times were 5,10,15,20,25,and 30 minutes at 50 and
`100 rpm. All sampling was performed using the fiber optic
`automated system of CTechnology instruments. The solu-
`tions were read at 296 nm using the Cary 50 spectropho-
`tometer. Care was taken to locate the tablet,active face up
`and coated surface down,at the center of the vessel. Inde-
`pendent studies were undertaken to confirm that salicylic
`acid did not leak through the epoxy resin and that the resin
`did not interfere with the assay results.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`1. Visualization Studies
`Visualization studies were undertaken as the first step in
`affirming the fluid flow patterns demonstrated previously
`using laser Doppler anemometry (8). The photograph from
`the first study is shown in Figure 1 to demonstrate the prin-
`ciple.
`This experiment was undertaken with the active side of
`the salicylic acid tablet down in 0.05 N sodium hydroxide
`solution in USP Apparatus 1 using unstirred conditions.
`The more dense dissolved material is easily visualized as it
`
`8 Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`Figure 1. Basket apparatus, no stirring
`
`Figure 2. Paddle apparatus, no stirring
`
`falls to the bottom of the vessel,with movement created
`by the density gradients.
`The next photograph in Figure 2 shows the results from a
`visualization experiment where the active side of the
`tablet is facing up in 0.05 N sodium hydroxide solution in
`USP Apparatus 2 under unstirred conditions. This photo-
`graph shows that the dissolving material collects under
`and around the sides of the tablet due to the difference in
`density between dissolved material and the bulk medium.
`
`See Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing… continued on page 10
`
`

`

`Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing … continued
`
`Figure 3. Paddle apparatus at 25 rpm
`
`Figure 4. Paddle Apparatus at 50 rpm
`
`This visualization experiment underscores the impor-
`tance of density gradients. While it is expected that the
`more dense dissolved material will be swept into the bulk
`solution by fluid flow when the paddle speed is either 50
`or 100 RPM,this premise is open to question. In fact,other
`studies (2,3) designed to test this question have demon-
`strated that density gradients under the tablet affect the
`coefficient of variation at both 50 and 100 RPM using
`Apparatus 2. These findings imply that the outcomes from
`the USP <711> Apparatus Suitability test using salicylic
`acid calibrator tablets may be affected by density gradi-
`ents’influence on the variability of the data.
`The next photograph in Figure 3 was taken with the
`active side up in 0.025 N sodium hydroxide using USP
`Apparatus 2 at 25 RPM.
`Since stirring by the paddle creates fluid flow approxi-
`mating solid body rotation at the bottom of the vessel,the
`rotating fluid turns and sweeps inward across the tablet
`surface near the bottom of the vessel. As the rotating fluid
`encounters the outer edge of the tablet surface it slows
`due to friction and then travels radially inward toward the
`center of the tablet. Then the fluid carrying the dissolved
`material spirals upward toward the center of the paddle.
`This photograph clearly shows the plume exiting upward
`toward the center of the paddle. There is visual evidence of
`imperfect mixing of the more dense dissolved solution
`with the bulk solution at this stirring speed.
`For comparative purposes,the same experiment was run
`at 50 and 100 RPM. The resulting photographs from these
`experiments are shown in Figures 4 and 5 (Figure 4 is at 50
`RPM and Figure 5 is at 100 RPM).
`At 50 RPM the plume is well formed,and mixing with the
`bulk solution seems to be uniform. Although the shear
`pattern at the tablet surface is not evident in this photo-
`
`10 Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`Figure 5. Paddle apparatus at 100 rpm
`
`graph,the color at the tablet surface is indicative of the
`underlying physicochemical process related to dissolu-
`tion. The physicochemical factors that play a role in the
`microenvironment at the tablet surface include the solu-
`bility of the dissolving material,the pKa of the dissolving
`material,the buffer capacity of the dissolution medium,
`and the pKa of the buffer relative to the pKa of the dissolv-
`ing material.
`While this idealized visualization experiment shows the
`dissolution from one surface facing the paddle,it is impor-
`tant to note that the dissolution process will be different
`for the rim and the bottom surfaces. This point was
`emphasized by Freebern (2) as well as Healy et al. (14) who
`demonstrated the effect of different surfaces on the disso-
`lution rate of benzoic acid compacts.
`At a higher stirring speed of 100 RPM the upward lift of
`the dissolved material into the bulk solution is evident and
`
`

`

`They also reflect the underlying physicochemical process
`at the tablet surface that controls dissolution.
`
`2. Characterizing the Variability Associated With the
`Intrinsic Dissolution Rates
`The data from the dissolution experiments using USP
`Apparatus 2 and coated USP Salicylic Acid Tablets,with the
`active surface facing up toward the paddle,are shown in the
`following box-whisker plots (15) as Figures 6 and 7 where
`percent dissolved is plotted versus time under stirring con-
`ditions of 50 and 100 RPM.The median for six replicates at
`each time point is represented by the horizontal line.
`The percent dissolved is a linear function of time for
`these data at both 50 and 100 RPM.
`The variability of the data is indicated by the box length.
`At 50 RPM,the box lengths are approximately the same
`length over time while at 100 RPM the box lengths tend to
`increase with increasing time. This finding suggests that
`the variability may be time dependent at the higher stir-
`ring speed.
`The plots also show the upper and lower whisker
`lengths,which represent the largest and smallest values in
`each data set,respectively. The whisker length appears to
`increase with time at both 50 and 100 RPM,suggesting
`that the range of data may be correlated to time. At 50
`RPM the whiskers are reasonably symmetric with respect
`to the median at each time point while at 100 RPM the
`whiskers are increasingly asymmetric with increasing time.
`At 100 RPM,the median drifts away from the center of the
`box as time increases.
`In summary,the box-whisker plot analysis has demon-
`strated that 1) at 100 RPM the values are increasingly asym-
`metric with increasing time,2) the box length appears to
`increase with time,particularly at 100 RPM,and 3) the
`whisker length appears to increase with increasing time at
`both 50 and 100 RPM. Since apparatus suitability testing is
`usually linked with one pre-selected time point for the USP
`Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablet,this finding suggests that
`the apparent time dependence of the variability may be a
`factor in selecting the time point associated with the
`acceptance range for suitability testing.
`Given the small sample size of this study,additional
`studies are needed to determine the within-laboratory
`variability associated with the intrinsic dissolution rates.
`Within-lab variability will provide a basis on which to more
`rigorously evaluate the apparent time-dependent variabil-
`ity and will also allow a comparison of the level of differ-
`ence in variability between 50 and 100 RPM.
`
`3. Evaluation of the Intrinsic Dissolution Rates Within
`the Framework of a Convective Diffusion Model
`All dissolution data were generated from the modified
`USP Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablet,with one face and the
`
`Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`11
`
`Figure 6. Box Plot of paddle apparatus at 50 rpm
`
`Figure 7. Box plot of paddle apparatus at 100 rpm
`
`the plume becomes more diffuse. Other visualization experi-
`ments (5) have shown that at even higher agitation rates,the
`color at the dissolving surface becomes absent or unevenly
`dispersed across the tablet surface as the dissolved material
`is lifted from the surface at a faster rate. In this case the con-
`vection component of the dissolution mechanism out-
`weighs the diffusional component,and it is anticipated that
`the sensitivity of the test would be compromised.
`In summary,these visualization experiments are simple
`to perform and provide qualitative information about the
`underlying fluid flow patterns as well as evidence about
`the influence of stirring speed on density gradients and
`mixing of the dissolved material with the bulk solution.
`
`

`

`Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing … continued
`
`equation that relates the intrinsic dissolution rate to the
`stirring speed and the Reynolds number.
`This analysis has shown that USP Apparatus 2 operates
`within a convective-diffusion model within specified stir-
`ring speed ranges. This finding leads to the idea that intrin-
`sic dissolution testing may have potential as an apparatus
`suitability test to detect perturbations in the hydrodynam-
`ic conditions that affect the intrinsic dissolution rate.
`
`4. Reflecting an Accurate Picture of the
`Microenvironment at the Dissolving Tablet Surface
`The commonly used Nernst model and convective-diffu-
`sion models such as equations 4 and 5 both relate the dis-
`solution rate per unit surface area to the saturation solubil-
`ity of the pure drug (Cs) as follows:
`7) 〈J〉 ∝Cs.
`Other studies have shown that the solubility term is
`dependent upon the micro environmental pH,which,in
`turn,is coupled with the buffering capacity of a saturated
`solution of the drug (17). In fact,the micro environmental
`pH is dependent upon several factors including the pKa of
`the buffer,the pKa of the drug,the pH and buffer capacity of
`the buffer system,and the saturation solubility of the drug
`(17). Therefore,the bulk pH of the buffer is often an inaccu-
`rate approximation of the pH at the dissolving surface.
`The importance of this point has been emphasized by
`Rohrs (18) in a discussion of dissolution methods for poor-
`ly soluble compounds. In the case of salicylic acid,the
`micro environmental pH near the dissolving surface was
`approximated by determining the pH of a saturated solu-
`tion of salicylic acid in 0.05 M pH 7.4 buffer.
`The experimentally determined value under these con-
`ditions was 3.2,which is in reasonable agreement with the
`previously determined value of 3.4 (16). The saturation sol-
`ubility in pH 7.4 buffer is 0.073 M (16). This value,converted
`to g/cm3,was then used in equation 5 to generate the cal-
`culated value for the stationary disk model. We conclude
`that the stationary disk model reflects an accurate picture
`of the micro environment at the tablet surface where rate
`controlling interactions occur between the buffer species
`and the dissolving salicylic acid. This finding has practical
`implications when selecting buffer species,buffer concen-
`tration,and buffer pH for the dissolution medium. More-
`
`Table I – Intrinsic Dissolution Rates Determined under
`Compendial Conditions at pH 7.4 and at 50 and 100
`RPM Paddle Speeds
`
`Paddle
`Speed
`(RPM)
`
`Intrinsic
`Dissolution
`Rate (g/sec)
`
`Standard Error
`of the Intrinsic
`Dissolution Rate
`
`Intrinsic Dissolution
`Rate Per Unit Surface
`Area (g/sec/cm2)
`
`50
`
`100
`
`9.06E-06
`
`1.33E-05
`
`±4.02E-07
`
`±8.74E-07
`
`1.25E-05
`
`1.84E-05
`
`Figure 8. Aggregate data, percent dissolved
`
`rim coated with water impervious shellac. The surface area
`was constant during the experiment and tablet surfaces
`did not show excess wear patterns at the completion of the
`run. The aggregate data for each set of six tablets are
`shown in Figure 8.
`The percent dissolved data were transformed to amount
`dissolved and the data from six tablets at each time period
`were pooled and analyzed using least squares analysis,
`which provided an estimate of the slope and the standard
`error of the slope. These slopes represent the intrinsic dis-
`solution rates,which were then normalized to amount dis-
`solved per unit time per unit area. These results are given in
`Table I.
`Other relevant physical chemical data for salicylic acid
`and related fluid mechanical data needed to test equations
`4 and 5 are given in Table II.
`The data in Table II were used with in conjunction with
`equations 4 and 5 to independently calculate the intrinsic
`dissolution rates at 50 and 100 RPM from the rotating disk
`and stationary disk models. Table III compares calculated
`intrinsic dissolution rates with the experimental rates.
`The calculated values using the rotating disk model,
`equation 4,are considerably greater than the experimental
`values at both 50 and 100 RPM. In contrast there is good
`agreement between the experimental and calculated val-
`ues for the stationary disk at both 50 and 100 RPM,with γ =
`0.40. Therefore,we conclude that the experimentally
`determined intrinsic dissolution rates are in reasonable
`agreement with equation 5,the stationary disk model.
`These findings imply that the experimental intrinsic disso-
`lution rates are in agreement between 50 and 100 RPM
`when they are related to the stirring rate by:
`6) 〈J〉 ∝ (Reγ)1/2.
`Therefore,within these commonly used stirring ranges,
`intrinsic dissolution results follow from one underlying
`
`Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003
`
`12
`
`

`

`Table II - Relevant Physical Chemical Data for Salicylic Acid and Salicylic
`Acid Calibrator Tablets, Lot N, with Relevant Fluid Mechanical Data
`
`Saturation Solubility of Salicylic Acid in Water
`at 37 degrees C1
`Saturation Solubility of Salicylic Acid in pH 7.4
`Phosphate Buffer at 37 degrees C1
`Final pH of a Saturated Solution of Salicylic
`Acid in 0.05M Phosphate Buffer at 37 degrees C
`
`1.87E-02M,2.58 mg/mL
`
`7.30E-02M,10.07 mg/mL
`
`3.2
`
`Diffusion Coefficient for Salicylic Acid2
`
`1.132E-05 cm 2/sec
`
`Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablet Weight
`
`300 mg.
`
`Surface Area of Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablet
`
`0.7238 cm2
`
`Kinematic Viscosity of Water at 37 degrees C3
`
`0.00699 cm2/sec
`
`50 RPM;100 RPM
`
`Reynolds Number
`
`5.235 radians per sec.;10.47 radians per sec.
`
`1.73E02 at 50 RPM;3.45E02 at 100 RPM
`
`1.07E05 at 50 RPM;2.13E05 at 100 RPM
`
`Peclet Number
`ν/D
`Dimensionless stirring speed factor,γ4
`1Reference 16
`2M. Gibaldi,S. Feldman,and N. Weiner,Chem. Pharm. Bull. 18,715-723 (1970).
`3H. Nogami,T. Nagai,and A. Suzuki,Chem. Pharm. Bull.,14,329-338,1966.
`4 Reference 8.
`
`617
`
`0.4
`
`solution data tends to increase with
`increasing time during the dissolution
`process and that the relative magnitude
`of data dispersion is consistently higher
`at 100 RPM than at 50 RPM.
`These findings provide a basis to fur-
`ther develop and refine apparatus suit-
`ability test requirements using chemi-
`cal calibrators. One can envision an
`acceptance range that is based not only
`on the statistical analysis of an experi-
`mental data set,but also on an interval
`that is based on the difference between
`the experimental value and the calcu-
`lated value from the stationary disk
`model.
`In addition,it may be of value to eval-
`uate calibrator data for relationships
`between variability and time when
`selecting the time point for suitability
`testing. Finally,it would be worthwhile
`in future studies to determine the cut-
`off limits where the level of agitation
`begins to confound the ability to detect
`hydrodynamic and fluid mechanical perturbations.
`
`Table III - Comparison of Experimental Dissolution
`Rates (g/sec/cm2) with Rates Calculated Using the
`Rotating Disk and Stationary Disk Models
`
`Stirring
`Speed
`(RPM)
`
`Experimental
`Dissolution
`Rate per Unit
`Surface Area
`
`Rotating Disk
`Dissolution Rate
`per Unit Surface
`Area (equation 4)
`
`50
`
`100
`
`1.25E-05,n=6
`
`1.65E-05
`
`1.84E-05,n=6
`
`2.33E-05
`
`Stationary Disk
`Dissolution Rate
`per Unit Surface
`Area (equation 5)
`1.29E-05,γ = 0.40
`1.83E-05,γ = 0.40
`
`over,these findings support the principle that the micro
`environmental pH rather than the bulk pH controls the dis-
`solution rate process for the salicylic acid calibrator tablet.
`
`Summary
`Visualization experiments coupled with intrinsic dissolu-
`tion rates studies have demonstrated that this methodolo-
`gy is useful in characterizing the performance of USP Appa-
`ratus 2 within the framework of a convective-diffusion
`model. The experimentally determined dissolution rates
`were found to be in good agreement with those calculated
`independently from the stationary disk model at both 50
`and 100 RPM. This model accounts for convective effects
`and provides an accurate picture of the physicochemical
`interactions occurring in the microenvironment at the
`tablet surface. The model also demonstrates a quantitative
`relationship between the expected dissolution rate and
`stirring speed. Furthermore,through box-whisker plot
`analysis,the data demonstrate that the variability of the dis-
`
`References
`1) W.E. Hamlin,E. Nelson,B.E. Ballard,and J.G. Wagner,
`“Loss of Sensitivity in Distinguishing Real Differences
`In Dissolution rates due to Increasing Agitation Inten-
`sity”,J. Pharm.Sci.,51,432-435,1962.
`2) K. Freebern,“Dissolution Kinetics of Calibrator and
`Matrix Tablets In the USP Dissolution Apparatus”,Mas-
`ters Thesis,The University of Nebraska Medical Center,
`Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences,1993.
`3) K. Freebern,D. Robinson,and J. Mauger,“In Vitro Disso-
`lution of Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablets”,AAPS Mid-
`west Regional Meeting,Chicago,Illinois,1991.
`4) T. Viegas,R. Curatella,L. VanWinkle,and G. Brinker,
`“Measurement of Intrinsic Drug Dissolution Rates
`Using Two Types of Apparatus”,Pharmaceutical Tech-
`nology,June,2001.
`5) J. W. Mauger,“Physicochemical and Fluid Mechanical
`Factors Related to Dissolution Testing”,Dissolution
`Technologies,3(1),7-11,1996.
`6) Thakker,K.D.;Naik,N.C.;Gray,V.A. and Sun,S.,Fine-Tun-
`ing of Dissolution Apparatus for Apparatus Suitability
`Test Using the USP Dissolution Calibrators,Pharm.
`Forum,6(4),177-185,1980.
`7) PhRMA Subcommittee on Dissolution Calibration:
`Brune,S.,Bucko J.,Emr,S.,Gray,V.,Hippeli,K.,Kentrup,
`
`See Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing… continued on page 15
`
`Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003 13
`
`

`

`Intrinsic Dissolution Performance Testing … continued
`
`A.,Whiteman,D.,Loranger,M.,Oates,M.,‘Dissolution
`Calibrator:Recommendations for Reduced Chemical
`Testing and Enhanced Mechanical Calibration”,Pharm.
`Forum,26(4),1149-1166,2000.
`8) L.M. Bocanegra,G. Morris,J. Jurewich,and J.W. Mauger,
`“Fluid and Particle Laser Doppler Velocity Measure-
`ments and Mass Transfer Predictions for the USP Pad-
`dle Method Dissolution Apparatus”,Drug Develop-
`ment and Industrial Pharmacy,16 (9),1441-1464,1990.
`9) V. Levich,Physicochemical Hydrodynamics,Prentice-
`Hall,Inc.,Englewood Cliffs,NJ,1962,p. 52.
`10) C. Colton and K. Smith,“Mass Transfer to a Rotating
`Fluid. Transport from a Base of an Agitated Cylindrical
`Tank”,AIChE Journal,18 (5),958-967,1972.
`11) N. Khoury,J.W. Mauger,and S. Howard,“Dissolution
`Rate Studies from a Stationary Disk/Rotating Fluid Sys-
`tem”,Pharmaceutical Research,5,495-500,1988.
`12) T.Viegas,R. Curatella,L. VanWinkle,and G. Brinker,“Intrin-
`sic Drug Dissolution Testing Using the Stationary Disk
`System”,Dissolution Technologies,8(3),19-23,2001.
`13) H. Schlicting,Boundary Layer Theory,6th.ed.,McGraw Hill
`Book Company,New York,1968,pp. 93-97,pp. 213-218.
`14) A.M. Healy,L.G. McCarthy,K.M. Gallagher,and O.I. Corri-
`
`gan,“Sensitivity of Dissolution Rate to Location in the
`Paddle Dissolution Apparatus”,Journal of Pharmacy
`and Pharmacology,54,441-444,2002.
`15) J. W. Tukey,Exploratory Data Analysis,Addison-Wesley
`Publishing Co.,Reading Mass.,1977,pp. 39-46.
`16) Z. Ramtoola and O.I. Corrigan,“Dissolution Characteris-
`tics of Benzoic Acid and Salicylic Acid Mixtures in Reac-
`tive Media”,Drug Development and Industrial Pharma-
`cy,13,1703-1720,1987.
`17) D. French and J.W. Mauger,“Evaluation of the Physico-
`chemical Properties and Dissolution Characteristics of
`Mesalamine:Relevance to Controlled Intestinal Drug
`Delivery”,Pharmaceutical Research,10,1285-1290,1993.
`18) B. Rohrs,“Dissolution Method Development for Poorly
`Soluble Compounds”,Dissolution Technologies,8(3),
`August 2001.
`
`Acknowledgements
`Assistance and support from the USP is gratefully
`acknowledged. Specific recognition is given to Will Brown,
`Walter Hauck,and Margareth Marques for their valuable
`suggestions and support.
`
`Dissolution Technologies | AUGUST 2003 15
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket