throbber
V.
`
`‘
`
`A
`
`C,
`
`1
`
`AlVlNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS,
`LLC and AMNEAL
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 1 of 106
`PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW
`YORK, LLC,
`'
`
`Defendants.
`
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiffs Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Endo”) and Griinenthal GmbH (“Gr1‘inenthal”) for
`
`their Complaint against Defendants Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Amneal Pharmaceuticals
`
`of New York, LLC (collectively, “Amneal”), alleges as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Endo is a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at
`
`lOO Endo Boulevard, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 19317. Endo is a specialty Pharmaceuticals
`
`company engaged in the research, development, sale and marketing of prescription
`
`pharmaceuticals used, among other things, to treat and manage pain. Endo markets and
`
`distributes OPANA® ER, an innovative crush—resistant opioid (alternatively referred to herein as
`
`“Opana ER CRF”).
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Griinenthal GmbH (“Gri'1nenthal”) is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Germany, having an address at 52078 Aachen, Zieglerstafle 6, North
`
`Rhine—Westaphalia, Germany.
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2002
`
`Amneal v. Endo
`
`|PR2014-00360
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2002
`Amneal v. Endo
`IPR2014-00360
`
`

`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals is a pharmaceutical
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 2 of 106
`company engaged in the research, development, production, distribution, and sale of generic
`
`pharmaceuticals throughout the United States, including sales within this judicial district.
`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC
`
`(“Amneal New Yor ”) is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of
`
`the State of Delaware, and shares a principal place of business with Amneal Pharmaceuticals’
`
`administrative offices at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, New York 11788.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York is a pharmaceutical company
`
`engaged in the manufacturing for and the sale of generic prescription pharmaceutical products to
`
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals for distribution throughout the United States, including in this judicial
`
`district.
`
`NATURE OF ACTION
`
`7.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 100, et seq. and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, et
`
`seq.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`8.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 133 8(a) (patent infringement), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 (declaratory
`
`judgment).
`
`

`
`and/or the sale of a number of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold pursuant to
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 3 of 106
`approved abbreviated new drug applications within the United States and the State of New York
`
`generally and this judicial district specifically.
`
`I 1.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants by virtue of the
`
`fact that, inter alia, they have committed — or aided, abetted, planned, contributed to, or
`
`participated in the commission of —— tortious conduct in the State of New York that has led to
`
`foreseeable harm and injury to Endo.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals has submitted to FDA
`
`paperwork purporting to constitute an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) under
`
`§ 5050) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 3556) (“ANDA No. 20-4294”
`
`or “Amneal’s ANDA”), seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and
`
`sale of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg oxymorphone hydrochloride
`
`extended—release tablets, (“Amneals’s ANDA Products”), as a generic version of the drug
`
`described in Endo’s SNDA 201655.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal both manufactures the Amneal ANDA
`
`Products and conducts testing necessary to validate their quality in the State of New York. On
`
`further information and belief, Amneal intends to manufacture and test Amneal’s ANDA
`
`Products produced for commercial sale in the State of New York.
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York intends to manufacture generic
`
`

`
`15.
`
`Moreover, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and Amneal New York maintain continuous
`
`and systematic contacts with the State ofNew York and this District.
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 4 of 106
`
`16.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and Amneal New York are
`
`registered with the New York State Department of State as corporations actively conducting
`
`business within New York and maintain a registered agent within the state.
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals currently sells significant
`
`quantities of generic drug products in the Southern District of New York. Those products
`
`include, for example, generic versions of Percocet®, U1tracet®, and Neurontin®. A list of
`
`generic products manufactured and sold by Amneal Pharmaceuticals in the United States can be
`
`found at http://www.amneal.corn/index.php.
`
`18.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals maintains an
`
`administrative office at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, NY 11788; an oral solids manufacturing
`
`facility at 75 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, NY 11788; an oral solids and softgels manufacturing
`
`facility at 50 Horseblock Road, Brookhaven, NY 11719; and an oral solids research and
`
`development facility at 50 Horseblock Road, Brookhaven, NY 11719.
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York’s principal place of business is
`
`located at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, New York 11788.
`
`20.
`
`Furthermore, Amneal Pharmaceuticals has been sued as a patent infringer in this
`
`Court, asserted counterclaims in this Court, and declined to contest that this Court has personal
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 5 of 106
`The Drug Approval Process
`
`22.
`
`A company seeking to market a new drug in the United States must first obtain
`
`approval from FDA, typically through the filing of a New Drug Application (“NDA”). See 21
`
`U.S.C. § 355(a). The sponsor of the NDA is required to submit information on all patents
`
`claiming the drug that is the subject of the NDA, or a method of using that drug, to FDA, and
`
`upon approval, FDA then lists such patent information in its publication, the Approved Drug
`
`Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, which is referred to as the “Orange Book.”
`
`See 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(l) and (c)(2).
`
`23.
`
`On the other hand, a company seeking to market a generic version of a previously
`
`approved drug is not required to submit a full NDA. Instead, it may file an ANDA. See 21
`
`U.S.C. § 3550). The generic drug approval process is considered “abbreviated” because the
`
`generic manufacturer may piggyback on the innovator company’s data and FDA’s prior finding .
`
`of safety and efficacy by demonstrating, among other things, that the generic product is
`
`bioequivalent to the previously approved drug (the “listed drug” or “branded drug”).
`
`24.
`
`In conjunction with this “abbreviated” application process, Congress has put in
`
`place a process for resolving patent disputes relating to generic drugs, under which an ANDA
`
`filer must provide certifications addressing each of the patents listed in the Orange Book for the
`
`branded drug. See 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii); 21 C.F.R. § 314.94(a)(l2). An ANDA filer
`
`

`
`25.
`
`The sponsor of an ANDA which is accepted for review by FDA that contains a
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 6 of 106
`Paragraph TViCertification must provide notice (“Paragraph IV Notice”) to both the owner of the
`
`listed patents and the holder of the NDA for the referenced listed drug. The certification must
`
`include a detailed statement of the factual and legal bases for the applicant’s belief that the
`
`challenged patent is invalid or not infringed by the proposed generic product. 2l U.S.C. §
`
`355(i)(2)(B); 21 C.F.R. § 314.95.
`
`26.
`
`If the patentee or NDA holder files a patent infringement action within 45 days of
`
`receiving a Paragraph IV Notice from an ANDA filer, final approval of the ANDA is generally
`
`subject to a 30-month stay of regulatory approval, See 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iii); 21 CFR.
`
`§ 3 l4.l07(b)(3). The 30-month stay is important to innovator companies, such as Endo and
`
`Grtinenthal, because it protects them from the severe financial harm that could otherwise ensue
`
`from FDA granting approval to a potentially infringing product without first providing an
`
`opportunity for the innovators to prove infringement and obtain an injunction prohibiting sale of
`
`the infringing product. Put another way, the innovator company is assured of a 30-month period
`
`during which it may try to enforce its intellectual property rights and resolve any patent dispute
`
`before the generic product enters the market. See 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iii).
`
`Endo’s Opana ER CRF NDA
`
`27.
`
`On December 12, 2011, FDA approved Endo’s Supplemental New Drug
`
`Application (“SNDA”) 201655, under § 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21
`
`

`
`extended period of time.
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 7 of 106
`THE ENDO PATENTS
`
`29.
`
`On December 14, 2010, the PTO duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,851,482 (“the ’482 Patent”), entitled “Method For Making Analgesics” to Johnson Matthey
`
`Public Limited Company (“Johnson Matthey”) as assignee. Jen-Sen Dung, Erno M. Keskeny,
`
`and James J. Mencel are named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the ’482 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit A.
`
`30.
`
`Endo subsequently acquired full title to the ’482 Patent, and accordingly, Endo is
`
`now the sole owner and assignee of the ’482 Patent.
`
`31.
`
`Information regarding the Endo ’482 Patent was submitted to FDA for listing in
`
`the Orange Book. Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 314.53(e), FDA has listed the ’482 Patent in the
`
`Orange Book with reference to NDA 201655.
`
`32.
`
`On November 13, 2012, the PTO duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,309,122 (“the ’122 Patent”), entitled “Oxymorphone Controlled Release Formulations” to
`
`Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as assignee. Huai—Hung Kao, Anand R. Baichwal, Troy McCall, and
`
`David Lee are named as inventors. A true and correct ‘copy of the ’ 122 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit B.
`
`33.
`
`Endo is the sole owner and assignee of the ’ 122 Patent.
`
`34.
`
`Information regarding the Endo ’122 Patent has been submitted to FDA for listing
`
`

`
`’722 Patent”), entitled “Abuse-Proofed Dosage Form” to Gruenenthal GmbH, also known as
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 8 of 106
`Griinenthal GmbH, as assignee. Elisabeth Arkenau-Mario, Johannes Bartholomaus, and
`
`Heinrich Kugelmann are named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the ’722 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit C.
`
`37.
`
`On November 13, 2013, the PTO duly and legally issued US. Patent No.
`
`8,309,060 (“the ’060 Patent”), entitled “Abuse-Proofed Dosage Form” to Gruenenthal GmbH,
`
`also known as Griinenthal GmbH, as assignee. Elisabeth Arkenau-Marié, Johannes
`
`Bartholomaus, and Heinrich Kugelmann are named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the
`
`’060 Patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`
`38.
`
`Griinenthal is the assignee and owner of the ’722 and ’060 Patents (“the
`
`Grfinenthal Patents”).
`
`39.
`
`Endo has an exclusive license to the Grtinenthal Patents from Griinenthal,
`
`including a right to enforce the Griinenthal Patents.
`
`40.
`
`Information regarding the Griinenthal Patents was submitted to FDA for listing in
`
`the Orange Book. Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 314.53(e), FDA has listed the ’722 Patent in the
`
`Orange Book with reference to NDA 201655.
`
`41.
`
`Opana ER CRF is covered by one or more claims of each of the Griinenthal
`
`Patents.
`
`

`
`seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and sale of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 9 of 106
`mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg oxymorphone hydrochloride extended-release tablets
`
`(“Amneal’s ANDA Products”), as a generic version of the products described in SNDA 201655.
`
`43.
`
`In a letter dated September 21, 20l2 addressed to Endo and received on or about
`
`September 24, 2012, and in a separate letter addressed to Griinenthal dated October 10, 2012 and
`
`received by Grtinenthal on or about that same day, Amneal purported to notify Plaintiffs that
`
`Amneal had submitted ANDA No. 20-4294, seeking approval to manufacture, use, or sell
`
`Amneal’s ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’482 and ’722 Patents (“Amneal Notice
`
`Letters”).
`
`44.
`
`The Amneal Notice Letters claimed that Amneal’s ANDA included a Paragraph
`
`IV Certification stating that it was Amneal’s opinion that the claims of the ’482 and ’722 Patents
`
`are invalid, unenforceable, or are not infringed by the proposed manufacture, importation, use,
`
`sale, or offer for sale of the Amneal ANDA Products.
`
`45.
`
`This action was commenced before the expiration of forty—five days from the date
`
`Endo and Grijnenthal received the Amneal Notice Letters. This Amended Complaint adds two
`
`new Counts asserting infringement of the ’122 and ’060 patents which issued after the Complaint
`
`was filed.
`
`COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’482 PATENT
`
`46.
`
`Endo incorporates each of paragraphs 1-45 above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`

`
`or sale of Amneal’s ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’482 Patent. If granted
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 10 of 106
`approval, Amneal intends to launch its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’482 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, offer for sale, or sale of its ANDA Products
`
`would infringe the ’482.Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a)-(c).
`
`50.
`
`Any launch by Amneal of its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’482 Patent
`
`would cause Endo to suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
`
`51.
`
`Amneal was aware of the existence of the ’482 Patent, as demonstrated by its
`
`reference to that patent in the Amneal Notice Letters, and was aware that the filing of its
`
`Paragraph IV Certification with respect to the ’482 Patent would constitute infringement of the
`
`patent.
`
`COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’722 PATENT
`
`52.
`
`Endo incorporates each ofparagraphs 1-45 above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`53.
`
`The submission of Amneal’s ANDA to FDA, which includes certification under §
`
`505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(lV), constitutes infringement of the "722 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`27l(e)(2)(A).
`
`54.
`
`Amneal is seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`or sale of its ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’722 Patent. If granted approval,
`
`Amneal intends to launch Amneal’s ANDA Products before expiration of the " 722 Patent.
`
`55.
`
`Arnneal’s commercial manufacture, offer for sale, or sale of its ANDA Products
`
`-10-
`
`

`
`reference to that patent in the Amneal Notice Letters, and was aware that the filing of its
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 11 of 106
`Paragraph IV Certification with respect to the ’722 Patent would constitute infringement of the
`
`patent.
`
`COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’122 PATENT
`
`58.
`
`Endo incorporates each of paragraphs l-45 above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`59.
`
`The submission of Amneal’s ANDA to FDA constitutes infringement of the ’ l22
`
`Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(e)(2)(A).
`
`60.
`
`Amneal is seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`or sale of its ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’122 Patent. If granted approval,
`
`-
`
`Amneal intends to launch its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’ 122 Patent.
`
`61.
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, offer for sale, or sale of its ANDA Products
`
`would infringe the ’ 122 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(a)—(c).
`
`62.
`
`Any launch by Amneal of its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’ 122 Patent
`
`would cause Endo to suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
`
`COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’()60 PATENT
`
`63.
`
`' Plaintiffs incorporate each of paragraphs l-45 above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`64.
`
`The submission of Amneal’s ANDA to FDA constitutes infringement of the ’060
`
`Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(e)(2)(A).
`
`65.
`
`Amneal is seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`-11-
`
`

`
`67.
`
`Any launch by Amneal of its ANDA Products before expiration ofthe ’06(l Patent
`
`would cause Endo and Griinenthal to suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 12 of 106
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Endo and Griinenthal respectfully request the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed the ’482 Patent, and a declaration that
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would
`
`infringe the ’482 Patent;
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`A declaration that the ’482 Patent is Valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Amneal has infringed the ’722 Patent, and a declaration that
`
`Arnneal’s commercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would
`
`infringe the ’722 Patent;
`
`D.
`
`C.
`
`A declaration that the ’722 Patent is Valid and enforceable; A
`
`A judgment that Amneal has infringed the ’ 122 Patent, and a declaration that
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would
`
`infringe the ’ 122 Patent;
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`A declaration that the ’ 122 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Amneal has infringed the ’060 Patent, and a declaration that
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would
`
`infringe the ’060 Patent;
`
`-12-
`
`

`
`’722, ’ 122, and ’06O Patents, including any extensions;
`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 13 of 106
`J.
`A permanent injunction, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 27l(e)(4)(B), restraining and
`
`enjoining Amneal, its officers, agents, servants and employees, and those persons in active
`
`concert or participation with any of them, from infringement of the ’482, ’722, ’ 122, and ’060
`
`Patents for the full terms thereof, including any extensions;
`
`K.
`
`An order that damages or other monetary relief be awarded to Endo and
`
`Griinenthal if Arnneal engages in the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale,
`
`distribution or importation of Amneal’s ANDA Products, or in inducing such conduct by others,
`prior to the expiration ofthe ’482, ’722, ’l22, and ’060 Patents, and any additional period of
`
`exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled, and that any such damages or monetary
`
`relief be trebled and awarded to Endo and Griinenthal with prejudgment interest;
`
`L.
`
`A declaration that this an exceptional case and an award of reasonable attorneys’
`
`fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`M.
`
`Reasonable attorneys’ fees, filing fees, and reasonable costs of suit incurred by
`
`Endo and Grtinenthal in thisaction; and
`
`N.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`-13-.
`
`

`
`ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 14 of 106
`3/éflg/yggg
`Stephen D. Hoffman (SH 6089)
`WILK AUSLANDER LLP
`
`_ Of Counsel:
`
`Basil J. Lewris
`
`Joann M. Neth
`
`Jennifer H. Roscetti
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARRABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`
`--
`
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 408-4000
`bi11.1ewris@finnegan.com
`joann.neth@finnegan.corn
`jennifer.r0scetti@finnegan.com
`
`Anthony C. Tridico
`Avenue Louise 326, Box 37
`
`Brussels, Belgium B-1050
`01132 2 646 03 53
`
`anthony.tridico@finnegan.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`GRUNENTHAL GMBH
`
`14706803
`
`1515 Broadway, 43rd Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`
`(212) 981-2300
`shoffman@wi1kaus1ander.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`GRUNENTHAL GMBH
`
`Martin J. B1ack
`
`Robert D. Rhoad
`
`DECHERT LLP
`
`Cira Centre
`
`2929 Arch Street
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19104
`(215) 994-4000
`
`Ann M. Caviani Pease
`
`Jonathan D. Loeb
`
`DECHERT LLP
`
`2440 W. El Camino Real
`
`Suite 700
`
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`
`(650) 813-4800
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`-14-
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 15 of 106
`Case1:12-cv-08115—TPG-GWG Document3 Fi|ed11/14/12 Page15of106
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 16 of 106
`“’°°1"||||fM||fl||||||1'|ll1I|||H||111|||||1|lIF|1|1|M|fi||1|l||1||
`
`US00785l482B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Dung et al.
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`Dec. 14, 2010
`
`(54) METHOD FOR MAKING ANALGESICS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Jen-Sen Dung, Boothwyn, PA (US);
`Erno M. Keskeny, Wilmington, DE
`(US); James J. Mencel, North Wales, PA
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Johnson Matthey Public Limited
`Compnay, London (GB)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. l54(b) by 646 days.
`
`(21) Appl.No.: 11/866,840
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Oct. 3, 2007
`
`(65)
`
`(30)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2008/0146601A1
`
`Jun. 19, 2008
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`Dec. 14, 2006
`
`(GB)
`
`............................... .. 0624880.1
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`A61K 31/485
`(2006.01)
`C07D 489/04
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`.......................... .. 514/282; 546/45; 546/44
`(58) Field of Classification Search ............... .. 514/282;
`546/45, 44
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,332,950 A
`3,433,791 A
`3,812,132 A
`3,845,770 A
`3,916,899 A
`4,063,064 A
`4,088,864 A
`4,200,098 A
`4,285,987 A
`4,861,598 A
`4,957,681 A
`5,071,985 A
`5,215,758 A
`5,273,760 A
`5,286,493 A
`5,324,351 A
`5,356,467 A
`5,472,712 A
`5,869,669 A
`5,922,876 A
`5,948,788 A
`5,952,495 A
`5,981,751 A
`6,008,354 A
`6,008,355 A
`6,013,796 A
`6,177,567 B1
`6,262,266 B1
`6,291,675 B1
`6,365,742 B1
`6,395,900 B1
`
`7/1967 Blumberg et al.
`3/1969 Bentley
`5/1974 Grewet al.
`11/1974 Theeuwes et al.
`11/1975 Theeuwes et al.
`12/1977 Saunders et al.
`5/1978 Theeuwes et al.
`4/1980 Ayer et al.
`8/1981 Ayer etal.
`8/1989 Oshlack
`9/1990 Klimesch etal.
`12/1991 Andre et al.
`6/1993 Krishnamurthy
`12/1993 Oshlack et al.
`2/1994 Oshlack et al.
`6/1994 Oshlacket al.
`10/1994 Oshlack et al.
`12/1995 Oshlack et al.
`2/1999 Huang et al.
`7/1999 Huang et al.
`9/1999 Huang et al.
`9/1999 Huang et al.
`11/1999 Mudryket al.
`12/1999 Huang et al.
`12/1999 Huang etal.
`1/2000 Huang et al.
`1/2001 Chiu etal.
`7/2001 Chiu etal.
`9/2001 Coopet al.
`4/2002 Mudryk et al.
`5/2002 Coop et al.
`
`6,403,798 B2
`6,723,894 B2
`6,864,370 B1
`6,949,645 B1
`7,071,336 B2
`7,129,248 B2
`7,153,966 B2
`2002/0045755 A1
`2003/0129230 A1
`2003/0129234 A1
`2003/0157167 A1
`2006/0009479 A1
`2006/0173029 A1
`2008/0045716 A1
`2008/0125592 A1
`2008/0312442 A1
`
`6/2002 Chiu et al.
`4/2004 Fist et al.
`3/2005 Lin et al.
`9/2005 Francis
`7/2006 Francis et al.
`10/2006 Chapman et al.
`12/2006 Casner et al.
`4/2002 Coop et al.
`7/2003 Baichwal et al.
`7/2003 Baichwal et al.
`8/2003 Kao et al.
`1/2006 Bailey et al.
`8/2006 Chapman et al.
`2/2008 Smith et al.
`5/2008 Huang
`12/2008 Buehler et al.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`0 359 647
`WO 99/02529
`WO 01/29048
`WO 2005/028483
`WO 2007/103105 A2 *
`
`3/1990
`1/1999
`4/2001
`3/2005
`9/2007
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Andrew Coop et al., “L-Selectride as a General Reagent for the
`O-Demethylation and N-Decarbomethoxylation of Opium Alkaloids
`and Derivatives,” J'. Org. Chem., 1998, 63 (13), pp. 4392-4396.
`Ulrich Weiss, Derivatives of Morphine.
`II. Demethylation of
`14-hydroxycodeinone.
`14-Hydroxymorphinone
`and
`8, 14-
`Dihydroxydihydromorphinone, J'. Org. Chem., 1957, 22 (11), pp.
`1505-1508.
`U.S. Appl. No. 12/446,171 which is a National Stage of PCT/US07/
`68009 to Bao-Shan Huang, filed May 2, 2007 and entitled “Process
`for Preparing Oxymorphone”.
`U.S . Appl. No. 12/446,172 which is the National Stage ofPCT/US07/
`81513 to Bao-Shan Huang, filed Oct. 16, 2007 and entitled “Process
`for Preparing Oxymorphone, Naltrexone, and Buprenorphine”.
`Andre et al., “O-Demethylation of Opioid Derivatives with Methane
`Sulfonic Acid / Methionine: Application to the Synthesis of
`Naloxone and Analogues,” Synthetic Communications, vol. 22, No.
`16, pp. 2313-2327 (1992).
`Hosztafi et al., “Reactions of Azodicarboxylic Esters with Amines,”
`Scientia Pharmaceutica, vol. 55, pp. 61-75 (1987).
`Marton et al., “Herstellung von 6, 14-Ethenomorphinan-Derivaten,”
`Monatshefteftir Chemie, vol. 125, pp. 1229-1239 (1994).
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner—Charanjit S Aulakh
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—RatnerPrestia
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Improved analgesic oxymorphone hydrochloride contains
`less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta unsaturated ketones and
`pharmaceutical preparations comprising such oxymorphone
`hydrochloride. The oxymorphone hydrochloride is produced
`by reducing a starting material oxymorphone hydrochloride
`using gaseous hydrogen and under specified acidity, solvent
`system and temperature conditions. A specific polymorph of
`oxymorphone hydrochloride may be obtained by hydration.
`
`21 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 17 of 106
`Case 1:12—cv—08115-TPG-GWG Document 3
`Filed 11/14/12 Page 17 of 106
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 14, 2010
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`
`LO
`<3’
`
`40
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`°2Theta
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`l‘||
`
`I
`
`||I[llIl[
`500
`
`|_‘
`
`CQQ‘
`
`-
`
`3000
`
`2500
`
`2000
`
`FTT‘|‘|l‘1-ll
`
`1500-
`
`Counts/s
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 18 of 106
`Case 1:12-CV-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3
`Filed 11/14/12 Page 18 of 106
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`
`1
`METHOD FOR MAKING ANALGESICS
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention concerns an improved method for making
`analgesics, more especially for making the opiate oxymor-
`phone as its hydrochloride.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Oxymorphone, generally administered in the form of its
`hydrochloride salt, is a potent semi-synthetic opiate analge-
`sic, for the relief of moderate to severe pain, and has been
`approved for use since 1959. It can be administered as an
`injectable solution, suppository, tablet or extended release
`tablet. It is desirable to develop high purity forms of oxymor-
`phone and a method for its synthesis.
`Several methods for synthesising oxymorphone from com-
`pounds isolated from the opium poppy or compounds derived
`therefrom are known, for example, starting from morphine,
`thebaine, or from oxycodone. There remains the need for
`methods which permit the formation of oxymorphone with
`low contamination of alpha, beta unsaturated ketones. The
`present invention provides an improved oxymorphone prod-
`uct and a method for producing such oxymorphone.
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,129,248 claims a process for producing
`oxycodone hydrochloride with less than 25 ppm of 14-hy-
`droxycodeinone, by hydrogenating oxycodone having
`greater than 100 ppm 14-hydroxycodeinone. The synthetic
`route to oxycodone taught in US’248 starts from thebaine and
`produces 14-hydroxycodeinone as an intermediate product
`and 8,14-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone as a by-product
`resulting from over-oxidation ofthebaine. During conversion
`of oxycodone free base to the hydrogen chloride salt, the
`by-product may undergo acid-catalysed dehydration and be
`converted into 14-hydroxycodeinone. Thus the final oxyc-
`odone hydrogen chloride salt contains unreacted 14-hydroxy-
`codeinone as well as 14-hydroxycodeinone derived from the
`by-product 8,14-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone. A hydro-
`genation step is claimed to reduce contents of 14-hydroxyco-
`deinone from at least 100 ppm to less than 25 ppm.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`The present invention provides an oxymorphone hydro-
`chloride product containing less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta
`unsaturated ketones.
`
`45
`
`The invention also provides a method ofpurifying oxymor-
`phone hydrochloride to yield an oxymorphone hydrochloride
`product containing less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta unsatur-
`ated ketones, which method comprises reducing a starting
`material oxymorphone hydrochloride in a strongly acid water
`and alcohol solvent, using gaseous hydrogen at a temperature
`in the range from 60 to 70° C. Reduction is suitably carried
`out for a period of at least 20 hours, but in another embodi-
`ment, reduction is carried out for 1 to 20 hours.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The invention will be described below with reference to the
`
`drawing, in which:
`FIG. 1 is the Powder X-Ray Diffraction pattern collected
`for a hydrated oxymorphone hydrochloride product made
`according to Example 3.2D.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Preferably, the solvent is ethanol/water, although other
`water miscible alcohols, such as isopropanol and n-propanol,
`
`2
`
`may be used. The reaction medium is very acidic, preferably
`by incorporating at least two equivalents ofhydrochloric acid.
`A pH ofless than 1 is desirable.
`The reaction temperature is mo st preferably maintained at
`about 65° C. Hydrogen is conveniently supplied to the reac-
`tion vessel at 2.41 bar pressure.
`The method of the invention has been able to reduce start-
`
`ing material oxymorphone hydrochloride having very high
`(ofthe order of0.3 to 0.5%, or 3,000 to 5,000 ppm) content of
`alpha, beta unsaturated ketones to less than 10 ppm, and in
`many cases to undetectable levels (by HPLC).
`The starting material oxymorphone hydrochloride may be
`an isolated or non-isolated material. Desirably, it has been
`obtained by the formation of the hydrogen chloride salt by
`heating oxymorphone free base in the presence ofhydrochlo-
`ric acid and an alcohol/water reaction medium. Suitable tem-
`
`peratures are 60-70° C. It can be seen that the reaction
`medium is ideal for the reduction of the method of the inven-
`
`tion, so that it is generally not necessary to isolate the oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride. However, the starting material oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride may be isolated from the reaction
`medium or may be from another source.
`The oxymorphone free base is itselfpreferably prepared by
`a reduction of 14-hydroxymorphinone. This may be carried
`out in a single- or two-stage process. The reduction is prefer-
`ably carried out in acetic acid using gaseous hydrogen and a
`palladium on carbon catalyst. Preferred temperatures are of
`the order of30° C. The base is precipitated by adding aqueous
`ammonia (NH4OH).
`This reduction may be in the presence of the reaction
`medium to which is added dichloromethane in methanol,
`Florasil and n-propanol.
`The 14-hydroxymorphinone itself is most suitably pre-
`pared by hydroxylation of oripavine, using hydrogen perox-
`ide in the presence of formic acid.
`Oripavine is a known compound, which is extractable from
`poppy straw. The strain developed in Tasmania to be a high-
`Thebaine-yielding strain also produces higher than normal
`levels of oripavine.
`The process of the invention is highly flexible, permitting
`many reaction steps to be carried out without isolation of
`intermediate products, whilst still retaining high (ofthe order
`of 50%) overall yields from oripavine, as well as remarkably
`high purity. Under favourable conditions, the presence of
`alpha, beta unsaturated ketones is undetectable by conven-
`tional means such as HPLC, but the skilled person can readily
`achieve less than 10 ppm contamination. The process of the
`invention has been successfully carried out at kilogram scale.
`The oxymorphone hydrochloride having less than 10 ppm
`of alpha, beta unsaturated ketones can be incorporated into
`pharmaceutical dosage forms, e.g., by admixtures of the oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride having less than 10 ppm of alpha,
`beta unsaturated ketones with conventional excipients, i.e.,
`pharmaceutically acceptable organic or inorganic carrier sub-
`stances. For oral formulations, the dosage forms can provide
`a sustained release of the active component. Suitable phar-
`maceutically acceptable carriers include but are not limited
`to, alcohols, gum arabic, vegetable oils, benzyl alcohols,
`polyethylene glycols, gelate, carbohydrates such as lactose,
`amylose or starch, magnesium stearate, talc, silicic acid, vis-
`cous paraffin, perfume oil, fatty acid monoglycerides and
`diglycerides, pentaerythritol fatty acid esters, hydroxy-meth-
`ylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, etc. The pharmaceutical
`preparations can be sterilized and if desired mixed with aux-
`iliary agents, e.g., lubricants, disintegrants, preservatives, sta-
`bilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, salts for influencing
`osmotic pressure buffers, colouring, flavouring and/or aro-
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3 Filed 11/14/12 Page 19 of 106
`Case 1:12-CV-08115-TPG-GWG Document 3
`Filed 11/14/12 Page 19 of 106
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`
`3
`matic substances and the like. The compositions intended for
`oral use may be prepared according to any method known in
`the art and such compositions may contain one or more agents
`selected from the group consisting of inert, non-toxic phar-
`maceutically acceptable excipients that are suitable for the
`manufacture of tablets. Such excipients include, for example
`an inert diluent suc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket