throbber
Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 54
`
`ENDO - Ex. 2001
`Amneal v. Endo
`IPR2014-00360
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 2 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALCgGWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 2 of 54
`
`of its status as owner of certain of the patents-in-suit, as described in more detail below, and
`
`Grunenthal joins this matter as a plaintiff solely for prudential jurisdiction purposes.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Amneal
`
`Pharmaceuticals”) is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 440 U.S. Highway 22 East, Suite 104,
`
`Bridgewater, NJ 08897.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals is a pharmaceutical
`
`company engaged in the research, development, production, distribution, and sale of generic
`
`pharmaceuticals throughout the United States, including sales Within this judicial district.
`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC '
`
`' (“Amneal New York”) is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of
`
`the State of Delaware, and shares a principal place of business with Amneal Pharmaceuticals”
`
`administrative offices at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, New York 11788.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York is a pharmaceutical company
`
`engaged in the manufacturing for and the sale of generic prescription pharmaceutical products to
`
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals for distribution throughout the United States, including in this judicial
`
`district.
`
`NATURE OF ACTION
`
`7.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 100, et seq. and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, et
`
`seq.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`8.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 3 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 3 of 54
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) (patent infringement), and 28‘ U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 (declaratory
`
`judgment).
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(b).
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals conducts its North
`
`American operations in part through Amneal New York. Together, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and
`
`Amneal New York collaborate in the research, development, manufacture, testing, distribution
`
`and/or the sale of a number of pharmaceutical products manufactured and sold pursuant to
`
`approved abbreviated new drug applications within the United States and the State of New York
`
`generally and this judicial district specifically.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants by virtue of the
`
`fact that, inter alia, they have committed -—— or aided, abetted, planned, contributed to, or
`
`participated in the commission of— tortious conduct in the State of New York that has led to
`
`foreseeable harm and injury to Endo.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals has submitted to FDA
`
`paperwork purporting to constitute an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) under §
`
`5050') of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 3550) (“ANDA No. 20-4294”.
`
`or “Amneal’s ANDA”), seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, and
`
`sale of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg oxymorphone hydrochloride
`
`extended-release tablets, (“Amneals’s ANDA Products” , as a generic version of the drug
`
`described in Endo’s sNDA 201655.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal both manufactures the Amneal ANDA
`
`Products and conductstesting necessary to validate their quality in the State of New York. On
`
`further information and belief, Amneal intends to manufacture and test Amneal’s ANDA
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 4 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 4 of 54
`
`Products produced for commercial sale in the State of New York.
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York intends to manufacture generic
`
`Opana ER CRF for distribution and sale in this judicial district should Amneal’s ANDA be
`
`approved by FDA. Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals intends to distribute
`
`and sell generic Opana ER CRF in this judicial district should ANDA No. 20-4294 be approved .
`
`by FDA.
`
`15.
`
`Moreover, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and Amneal New York maintain continuous
`
`and systematic contacts with the State of New York and this District.
`
`16.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and Amneal New York are
`
`registered with the New York State Department of State as corporations actively conducting
`
`business within New York and maintain a registered agent within the state.
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals currently sells significant
`
`quantities of generic drug products in the Southern District of New York. Those products
`
`include, for example, generic versions of Percocet®, Ultracet®, and Neurontin®. A list of
`
`generic products manufactured and sold by Amneal Pharmaceuticals in the United States can be
`
`found at http://wmvarrmealcom/indexphp.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal Pharmaceuticals maintains an
`
`administrative office at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, NY 11788; an oral solids manufacturing
`
`facility at 75 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, NY 11788; an oral solids and softgelsmanufacturing
`
`facility at 50 Horseblock Road, Brookhaven, NY 11719; and an oral solids research and
`
`development facility at 50 Horseblock Road, Brookhaven, NY 11719.
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, Amneal New York’s principal place of business is
`
`located at 85 Adams Avenue, Hauppauge, New York 11788.
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 5 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 5 of 54
`
`20.
`
`Furthermore, Amneal Pharmaceuticals has been sued as a patent infringer in this
`
`Court, asserted counterclaims in this Court, and declined to contest that this Court has personal
`
`jurisdiction over it. See, e.g., Purdue Pharm, L.P., er a]. v. Amneai Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 11-
`
`cv-081 53-SHS-JLC; Pfizer Inc, et at. v, Actavis Inc, et at, 10-cv-8197-(TPG).
`
`21.
`
`Based on the facts and causes alleged herein, and for additional reasons to be
`
`devoloped through discovery, this Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`The Drug Approval Process
`
`22.
`
`A company seeking to market a new drug in the United States must first obtain
`
`approval from FDA, typically through the filing of a New Drug Application (“NBA”). See 21
`
`U.S.C. § 355(a). The sponsor of the NDA is required to submit information on all patents
`
`claiming the drug that is the subject of the NDA, or a method of using that drug, to FDA, and
`
`upon approval, FDA then lists such patent information in its publication, the Approved Drug
`
`Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, which is referred to as the “Orange Book.”
`
`See 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(1) and (c)(2).
`
`23.
`
`On the other hand, a company seeking to market a generic version of a previously
`
`approved drug is not required to submit a full NDA. Instead, it may file an ANDA. See 21
`
`U.S.C. § 3550). The generic drug approval process is considered “abbreviated” because the
`
`generic manufacturer may piggyback on the innovator company’s data and FDA’s prior finding
`
`of safety and efficacy by demonstrating, among other things, that the generic product is
`
`bicequivalent to the previously approved drug (the “listed drug” or “branded drug”).
`
`24.
`
`In conjunction with this “abbreviated” application process, Congress has put in
`
`place a process for resolving patent disputes relating to generic drugs, under which an ANDA
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 6 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 6 of 54
`
`filer must provide certifications addressng each of the patents listed in the Orange Book for the
`
`branded drug. See 21 U.S.C. § 3556)(2)(A)(vii); 21 CPR. § 314.94(a)(12). AnANDA filer
`
`may certify, for instance, that it believes a patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the
`
`manufacture, use, or sale of the generic drug for which the ANDA is submitted. See 21 U.S.C. §
`
`3550)(2)(A)(vii)(IV); 21 C.F.R. § 314.94(a)(12)(i)(A)(4). This is know as a “Paragraph IV
`
`Certification.”
`
`25.
`
`The sponsor of an ANDA which is accepted for review by FDA that contains a
`
`Paragraph IV Certification must provide notice (“Paragraph IV Notice”) to both the owner of the
`
`listed patents and the holder of the NDA for the referenced listed drug. The certification must
`
`include a detailed statement of the factual and legal bases for the applicant’s belief that the
`
`challenged patent is invalid or not infringed by the proposed generic product. 21 U.S.C. §
`
`3550)(2)(B); 21 C.F.R. § 314.95.
`
`26.
`
`If the patentee or NDA holder files a patent infringement action within 45 days of
`
`receiving a Paragraph IV Notice from an ANDA filer, final approval of the ANDA is generally
`
`subject to a 30-month stay of regulatory approval. See 21 U.S.C. § 3550)(5)(B)(iii); 21 C.F.R.
`
`§ 314.107(b)(3). The 30-month stay is important to innovator companies, such as Endo and
`
`J Grtinenthal, because it protects them fi-om the severe financial harm that could otherwise ensue
`
`from FDA granting approval to a potentially infringing product without first providing an
`
`opportunity for the innovators to prove infringement and obtain an injunction prohibiting sale of
`
`the infringing product. Put another way, the innovator company is assured of a 30-month period
`
`during which it may try to enforce its intellectual property rights and resolve any patent dispute
`
`before the generic product enters the market. See 21 U.S.C. §I355(i)(5)(B)(iii).
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 7 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 7 of 54
`
`Endo’s Opana ER CRF NBA
`
`27.
`
`On December 12, 2011, FDA approved Endo’s Supplemental New Drug
`
`Application (“sNDA”) 201655, under § 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21
`U.S.C. § 355(b), for a new dosage form of Opana ER which is a crush-resistant tablet that
`
`contains oxymorphone hydrochloride for the relief ofpain (hereinafter, “Opana BR CRF”).
`
`28.
`
`Opana ER CRF is distributed and sold throughout the United States for relief of
`
`moderate to severe pain in patients requiring continuouslaround-the-clock opioid treatment for an
`
`extended period oftime.
`
`THE ’482 PATENT
`
`29.
`
`On December 14, 2010, the PTO duly and legally issued U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,851,482 (“the ’482 Patent"), entitled “Method for Making Analgesics” to Johnson Matthey
`
`Public Limited Company (“Johnson Matthey”) as assignee. Jen-sen Dung, Erno MQ Keskeny,
`
`and James J. Mencel are named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the ’482 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit A-
`
`30.
`
`Endo subsequently acquired fiill title to the ’482 Patent, and accordingly, Endo is
`
`now the sole owner and assignee of the ’482 Patent.
`
`31.
`
`Information regarding the Endo 1482 Patth was submitted to FDA for listing in
`
`the Orange Book. Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 314.53(e), FDA has listed the ’482 Patent in the
`
`Orange Book with reference to NBA 201655.
`
`32.
`
`Opana ER CRF is covered by one or more claims ofthe ’482 Patent.
`
`THE ’722 PATENT
`
`33.
`
`On June 5, 2012, the PTO duly and legallyissued U.S. Patent No. 8,192,722 (“the
`
`’722 Patent”), entitled “Abuse-Proofed Dosage Form” to Gruenenthal GmbH, also known as
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 8 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 8 of 54
`
`Grfinenthal GmbH, as assignee. Elisabeth Arkenau-Marié, Johannes BartltOlOmaus, and
`
`Heinrich Kugelmann are named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the ’722 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit B. The ’722 Patent expires on September 15, 2025.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`Griinenthal is theassignee and owner of the ’722 Patent.
`
`Endo has an exclusive license to the ’722 Patent from Griinenthal, including a
`
`right to enforce the ’722 Patent.
`
`36.
`
`Information regarding the ’722 Patent was submitted to FDA for listing in the
`
`Orange Book. Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 314.53(e),_FDA has listed the ’722 Patent in the Orange
`
`Book in reference to NDA 201655.
`
`37.
`
`Opana ER CRF is covered by one or more claims of the ’722 Patent.
`
`AMNEAL’S ANDA FILING
`
`38.
`
`Upon information and belief, some time before September 21, 2012, Arnneal
`
`submitted to FDA paperwork purporting to constitute an Abbreviated New Drug Application
`
`(“ANDA”) under § 5056) ofthe Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 3556),
`
`seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture,use, and sale of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10
`
`mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg oxymorphone hydrochloride extended—release tablets
`
`(“Amneal’s ANDA Products”), as a generic version of the products described in sNDA 201655.
`
`39.
`
`In a letter dated September 21, 2012 addressed to Endo and received on or about
`
`September 24, 2012, and in a separate letter addressed to Griinenthal dated October 10, 2012 and
`
`received by Grfinenthal on or about that same day, Amneal purported to notify Plaintiffs that
`
`Amneal had submitted ANDA No. 20-4294, seeking approval to manufacture, use, or sell
`
`Amneal’s ANDA Products before the expiration of the ’482 and ”722 Patents (“Amneal Notice
`
`Letters”).
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 9 of 54
`. Case.1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document1
`Filed 11/07/12 Pagerf 54
`
`40.
`
`The Amneal Notice Letters claimed that Amneal’s'ANDA included a Paragraph
`
`IV Certification stating that it was Amneal’s opinion that the claims of the ’482 and ’722 Patents
`
`are invalid, unenforceable, or are not infringed by the proposed manufacture, importation, use,
`
`sale, or offer for sale of the Amneal ANDA Products.
`
`41.
`
`This action is being commencedbefore the expiration of forty-five days from the
`
`date Endo and Grfinenthal received the Amneal Notice Letters.
`
`COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’482 PATENT
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`Endo incorporates each of paragraphs 1-41 above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`The submission of Amneal’s ANDA to FDA, which includes certification under §
`
`5050)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), constitutes infringement of the ’482 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(c)(2)(A).
`
`44.
`Amneal is seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`or sale ofAmneal’s ANDA Products before the expiration ofthe ’482 Patent. Ifgranted
`
`approval, Amneal intends to launch its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’48.? Patent.
`
`45.
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, offer for sale, or sale of its ANDA Products
`
`would infringe the ’43:: Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(a)-(c).
`
`46.
`
`Any launch by Amneal of its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’482 Patent
`
`would cause Endo to suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
`
`47.
`
`Amncal was aware of the existence of the ‘482 Patent, as demonstrated by its
`
`reference to that patent in the Amneal Notice Letters, and was aware that the filing of its
`
`Paragraph IV Certification with respect to the ”482 Patent would constitute infringement of the
`
`patent.
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 10 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 10 of 54
`
`COUNT ll: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ”722 PATENT
`
`I 48.
`
`Endo incorporates each of paragraphs 14] above as if set forth fully herein.
`
`49.
`
`The submission of Amneal’s ANDA to FDA, which includes certification under §
`
`505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), constitutes infringement ofthe ’722 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(c)(2)(A).
`
`I
`
`50.
`
`Amneal is seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use,
`
`or sale of its ANDA Products before the expiration ofthe ’722 Patent. If granted approval,
`
`Amneal intends to launch Amneal’s ANDA Products before expiration of the ’722 Patent.
`
`51.
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, offer for sale, or sale of its ANDA Products
`
`would infringe the "[22 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 27l(a)-(c).
`
`52.
`
`Any launch by Amneal of its ANDA Products before expiration of the ’722 Patent
`
`would cause Endo to suffer immediate and irreparable harm.
`
`53.
`
`Amneal was aware ofthe existence of the "[22 Patent, as demonstrated by its
`
`reference to that patent in the Amneal Notice Letters, and was aware that the filing of its
`
`Paragraph IV- Certification with respect to the ’722 Patent would constitute infringement ofthe
`
`patent.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Endo respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`-A judgment that Defendants have infiinged the ’482 Patent, and a declaration that
`
`Amneal’s connnercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would
`
`infringe the ’48:! Patent;
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`A declaration that the ’482 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`A judgment that Amneal has infringed the ”722 Patent, and a declaration that.
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page‘11 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 11 of 54
`
`Amneal’s commercial manufacture, distribution, use, and sale of its ANDA Products would ‘
`
`infringe the ’722 Patent;
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`A declaration that the "1'22 Patent is valid and enforceable;
`
`An order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C, § 271(c)(4)(A), that the effective date of any
`
`approval of Amneal’s ANDA No. 20-4324 under § 5050) of the Federal Food, Drug and
`
`Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 3550'), shall not be earlier than the last expiration date ofthe ’482 and
`
`’722 Patents, including any extensions;
`
`F.
`
`A permanent injunction, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(c)(4)(B), restraining and
`
`enjoining Amneal, its officers, agents, servants and employees, and those persons in active
`
`concert or participation with any of them, from infringement of the ’482 and ’722 Patents for the
`
`full terms thereof, including any extensions;
`
`G.
`
`An order that damages or other monetary relief be awarded to Endo if Amneal
`
`engages in the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, distribution or importation of
`
`Amneal’s ANDA Products, or in inducing such conduct by others, prior to the expiration of the
`
`’482 and ’722 Patents, and any additional period of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become
`
`entitled, and that any such damages or monetary relief be trebled and awarded to Endo with
`
`prejudgment interest;
`
`H.
`
`A declaration that this an exceptional case and an award of reasonable attorneys’
`
`fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`I.
`
`Reasonable attorneys’ fees, filing fees, and reasonable costs of suit incurred by
`
`Enclo and Grtinenthal inthis action; and
`
`J.
`
`Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`-11".
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 12 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv—08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 12 of 54
`
`Dated: November 7, 2012
`
`Of Counsel:-
`
`Basil J. Lewris
`Joann M. Neth
`Jennifer H. Roscetti
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARRABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`
`901 New York Avenue, NW.
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 408-4000
`bill.lewfis@finnegan.com
`joarm.neth@finnegan.eom
`jennifer.roscetti@finnegan.com
`
`Anthony C. Tridico
`Avenue Louise 326, Box 37
`Brussels, Belgium B-1050
`01132 2 646 03 53
`
`anthony.tridico@finnegan.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`GRUNENTHAL GMBH
`
`B,W
`
`Joshua I. Sherman
`DECHERT LLP
`1095 Avenue of the Americas
`
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 698-3500
`joshua.sherman@dechert.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`@‘ 272%
`
`Stephen D. Hoffman (SH 6089)
`WILK AUSLANDER LLP
`
`1515 Broadway, 43rd Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`
`(212) 981-2300
`shoffinan@wilkauslander.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`GRUNENTHAL GMBH
`
`Martin J. Black
`
`Robert D. Rhoad
`DECHERT LLP
`
`Cira Centre
`2929 Arch Street
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19104
`(215) 994-4000
`
`Ann M. Caviani Pease
`Jonathan D. Loeb
`DECHERT LLP
`
`2440 W. El Camino Real
`Suite 700
`
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`(650) 813-4800
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`
`_ 12.-
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 13 of 54
`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 13 of 54
`
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 14 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 14 of 54
`
`|l||||11|1|||l|||1|||1|l-||l||||l|||1||| lllll‘lllli|Ill||1|||||l||||ll|ll
`
`U3007851482B2
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`(10) Patent No.:
`(12) United States, Patent
`Dung et a].
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Dec. 14, 2010
`
`
`(54) DIETHOD FOR MAIflNG ANALGESICS
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Jen-Sen Dung, 5001th PA (US);
`Erna M. Keskeny, Wilmington, DE
`(US); James J. Mencel, North Wales, PA
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Johnson Matthey Public Limited
`Compnay, London (GB)
`
`( " ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, theterm ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusied under 35
`U'S‘C‘ 15407)!” 646 days'
`(2,) Appl- No: 111866340
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Oct. 3, 2007
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 200310146601 A1
`
`Jun. 19, 2003
`
`.
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`(30)
`Dec. 14, 2005
`(GB)
`0524300.:
`
`(51) “It 0-
`(2006.01)
`A6111” 31/435
`(2006.01)
`607.0 489/04
`11.3. C1.
`............................ 5141232; 546145; 546144
`(52)
`58) Field ofClassification Search
`.............. 5141202
`(
`’
`_
`_
`, 545/45: 44
`See apphcatlon file for complete search h1story:
`Rdmm‘ cm"
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[55)
`
`3,332,950 A
`3,433,791 A
`3.312.132 A
`3.345.770 A
`31915-899 A
`4.053.054 A
`4,088,864 A
`4.200.098 A
`31:21.33; it
`.
`'
`4,957,681 A
`5,071,985 A
`5,215,753 11
`5,273,760 A
`5,286,493 A
`5,324,351 A
`5,356,467 A
`
`5,472,712 A
`5,859,669 A
`5,922,876 A
`5.948.785 A
`5,952,495 A
`5,931,751 A
`6-00333‘; i
`2131:1196 A
`6177’s6'] Bl
`,
`,
`6262 266 B]
`'
`0,291,675 131
`6,365,742 131
`6,395,900 31
`
`711907 Blumherg at al-
`311969 Bentley
`511-974 (31W 31 a].
`1111974 “WW5 5t 3-1-
`“41975 “1961”” “t 31-
`1211977 Sill-"“1319 3* 111-
`511978 Theeuwes eta].
`411980 Aver etai.
`$133; 3141:531-
`,
`911990 Klunesch et al.
`””991 Andreeta].
`011995 Krinhnnmurfliy
`1211993 09111001: at al.
`211994 011111.401: at 111.
`61' 1994 0511th at al.
`1011994 Oshlhcketal.
`
`1211995 Oshlack e101.
`211999 Huang et a].
`711999 Huang et a].
`911999 Huang at 0].
`911999 Huang ct 111.
`1111999 MDdJ'Jrk fit 51-
`”“999 Huang 2: 91'
`$533 $3115 at 3‘
`112001 Chins
`'
`metal.
`71200] Chiu at 01.
`912001 Coop 01 01.
`412002 Mudryk at 31.
`512002 Coop at 111.
`
`,
`
`.
`
`6,403,798 B2
`6,723,894 B2
`6,864,370 Bl
`6.949.645 Bl
`7371335 32
`7,129,248 B2
`7,153,966 132
`
`512002 Chin ct 31.
`412004 Fifltetal.
`312005 Lin 31111.
`912005 Francis
`712005 Francis =1 31-
`1012006 (lawman 018.1.
`1212006 Casneletal.
`
`200210045755 A1
`200310129230 A]
`20031018234 A]
`
`412002 C091)“ 31-
`712003 Bmchwal et :1].
`712003 Baichwal eta].
`
`200310157157 A1
`200510009479 A1
`200010173029 A]
`200310045710 A]
`2001110125592 A]
`200810312442 A1
`
`812003 K“? “”1-
`”2006 Bmleyetal.
`312000 Chapman e1 .1.
`21200:; Smith at al.
`512000 Huang
`1212008 Bushleret 21.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 359 647
`311990
`EP
`wo 99102529
`1,11999
`W0
`WO 01129048
`412001
`W0
`wo 20051028483
`312005
`wo
`“’0 W0 20071103105 AZ ‘
`912007
`
`NS
`
`BR PUBL .
`1134110
`0TH
`Andrew Coop e! 111.. “L—Salectride as a General Reagent for I110
`“WWW: and N'owmthwhm 01015101001101on5
`“10010301103, 1‘ 9’5 c1100., ”98' 6.31131 1"" 43924390
`1.1111011 Wem, Dcnvahves of Morphme.
`II. Demethyiahon of
`14.100101131000000”.
`14-Hydroxymorphinone
`and
`3,14.
`Dflnydroxydihydmmorphinom, _;_ 0,3 Chem. 1957, 22 (11), PP.
`1505—1508.
`U.S.App1. No. 121440171 which is 11 111110031 Stage 0111017115071
`63009 to Ban-Shah Huang, filed May 2, 2007 and entitled “Process
`for Preparing amorphous”.
`U.S.Appl. No. 12144697201101.5100: National smgnot‘PCTMSW
`81513 to Baa-Shah Huang, 111611001. 16. 2007 and entitled “Process
`for Pmparing (”yum-phone, Nalu'exone, and Btipranorphine".
`Andre at 111., “0-Demefliylnfion ofOpioid Derivativls with Methane
`Sulfonic Acid 1 Methionine: Application to the Synthesis of
`Naloxone and Analogues,” 53011211: Communications. vol. 22, No.
`15. pp. 23134321 (1992)
`110021311 et 01.,“Rnac1ions of Azodicarboxylic 133101.: with Amines,"
`Scienn'aPkarmaceutfca, vol. 55, pp. 51—75 (1987).
`Marten at 01.,“Herslellun5 van 6, 14-Eflienomorphimn—Derivatenl‘
`-
`_
`Monatyltefleffir Charlie, vol. 125, pp. 1229 1239 (1994).
`a cited by examine,-
`
`Primary Examiner%hamgjit S Aulakh
`(74) Atmmey, Agent, or FirnI—RamerPIestia
`
`(57)
`
`'
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`improved analgesic oxymorphone hydmchloride contains
`less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta unsaturated ketoncs and
`pharmaceufica] preparations comprising such oxymorphone
`hydrochloride. Theoxymoxphoue hydrochloride is pmduced
`by reducing a starting matm-ial oxymorphone hydrochloride
`using gaseous hydrogen and under specified acidity, solvent
`.
`.
`.
`system and temperature condmons. A speplfic polymorph of
`'
`btamedh 11 (Indian.
`“Kymmlee hymmde may be 0
`y 3’
`
`21 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 15 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 15 of 54
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`‘
`
`Dec. 14, 2010'
`
`Us 7,851,482 B2
`
`In .V
`
`2025303540
`
`1O
`
`15
`
`'ZTheta
`
`Countsls
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 16 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 16 of 54
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`
`1
`METHOD FOR MAKING ANALGESICS
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention concerns an improved method for making
`analgesics, more especially for making the opiate oxymor—
`phone as its hydrochloride.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Oxymorphone, generally administered in the form of its
`hydrochloride salt, is a potent semi-synthetic opiate analge-
`sic, for the relief of moderate to severe pain, and has been
`approved for use since 1959. It can be administered as an
`injectable solution, suppository, tablet or extended release
`tablet. It is desirable to develop high purity forms ofoxymor-
`phone and a method for its synthesis.
`Severalmethcds for synthesising oxymorphonefi-om com-
`pounds iselated from the opium poppy or compounds derived
`therefrom are lotown, for example, starting from morphine,
`thebaine, or from oxycodone. There remains the nwd for
`methods which permit the formation of oxymorphone with
`low contamination of alpha, beta unsaturated ketones. The
`present invention provides an improved oxymorphone prod-
`uct and a method for producing such oxymorphone.
`US. Pat. No. 7,129,248 claims a process for producing
`oxycodone hydrochloride with less than 25 ppm of l4-hy-
`droxycodeinone, by hydrogenating oxycodonc having
`greater than 100 ppm l4-hydroxycodeinone. The synthetic
`route to oxycodone taught inUS’24S starts from thebaine and
`produces l4-hydrcxycodeinone as an intermediate product
`and 8,14—dihydroxy—7,3—dihydrocodeinone as a by-product
`resulting from over-oxidation ofthebaine. During conversion
`of oxycodone free base to the hydrogen chloride salt, the
`by-product may undergo acid-catalysed dehydration and be
`converted into l4-hydroxycodeinone. Thus the final oxyc-
`odone hydrogen chloride salt contains unreacted ] 4-hydroxy-
`codeinone as well as l4-hydroxycodeinone derived from the
`lay—product 8,14—dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone. A hydro-
`genation step is claimed to reduce contents of14-hydroxyco-
`deinooe from at least 100 ppm to less than 25 ppm.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`The present invention provides an oxymomhone hydro-
`chloride product oontaining less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta
`unsaturated ketones.
`
`45
`
`The invention also provides a method ofpurifyingoxymor-
`phone hydrochloride to yieldan oxymorphone hydrochloride
`product containing less than 10 ppm of alpha, beta unsatur-
`ated ketones, which method comprises reducing a stoning
`material oxymorphonehydrochloride ina strongly acid water
`' and alcohol solvent, using gaseous hydrogen at a temperature
`inthe range from 60 to 70° C. Reduction is suitably carried
`out for a period of at least 20 hours, but in another embodi-
`ment, reduction is carried out for 1 to 20 hours.
`
`BRlEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The invention will be described below with referenceto the
`drawing, in which:
`FIG. 1 is the Powder X-Ray Diffraction pattern collected
`for a hydrated oxymorphone hydrochloride product made
`according to Example 3.2D.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Preferably, the solvent is ethanol/water, although other
`watermisciblc alcohols, such as isopropanol andn-propano],
`
`2
`
`may be used. The reaction medium is very acidic, preferably
`by incorporatingatleast two equivalents ofhydroch]uric acid.
`A pH ofless than 1 is desirable.
`The reaction temperature is most preferably maintained at
`about 65° C. Hydrogen is conveniently supplied to the reac-
`tion vessel at 2.41 bar pressure.
`The method ofthe invention has been able to reduce start-
`ing material oxymorphone hydrochloride having very high
`(ofthe order of0.3 to 0.5%, or3,000 to 5,000 ppm) content of
`alpha, beta unsaturated ketonec to less than 10 ppm, and in
`many cases to undetectable levels (by HPLC).
`The starting material oxymotphoue hydrochloride may be
`an isolated or non-isolated material. Desirably, it has been
`obtained by the formation of the hydrogen chloride salt by
`heating oxymorphone free base in the presence ofhydrochlo-
`tic acid andan alcohollwater reaction medium. Suitable tem-
`peratures are 60-70” C. It can be seen that the reaction
`medium is ideal for the reduction ofthe method of the inven-
`tion, so that it is generally not necessary to isolate the oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride. Howaver, the starting material oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride may be isolated from the reaction
`medium or may be from another source.
`The oxymorphonefree base is itselfpreferably preparedby
`a reduction of l4-hydroxymorphinone. This may be carried
`out in a single— or two-stage process. The reduction is prefer-
`ably carried out in acetic acid using gaseous hydrogen and a
`palladium on carbon catalyst. Preferred temperamres are of
`the order of30° C. The base is precipitated by adding aqueous
`ammonia (NH40H).
`This reduction may be in the presence of the reaction
`medium to which is added dichloromcthane in methanol
`Florasil and n-propanol.
`The l4¢hydroxymorphincoc itself is most suitably pre-
`pared by hydroxylation of oripavine, using hydrogen perox-
`ide in the presence offormic acid.
`Oripavinc is aknown compound, which is extractablefrom
`poppy straw. The strain developed in Tasmania to be a high-
`Thcbaine—yiclding strain also produces higher than normal
`levels of oripavine.
`The process of the invention is highly flexible, permitting
`many reaction steps to be carried out without isolation of
`intermediate products, whilst still retaining high (ofthe order
`of50%) overall yields from oripavine, as well as markebly
`high purity. Under favourable conditions, the presence of
`alpha, beta unsaturated ketones is undetectable by conven-
`tional means such as HPLC, butthe skilled person can readily
`achieve less than 10 ppm contamination. The process of the
`invention has been successfully carried out at kilogram scale.
`The oxymorphone hydrochloride having less than 10 ppm
`of alpha, beta unsattuated ketones can be incorporated into
`pharmaceutical dosage forms, e.g., by admixtures ofthe oxy-
`morphone hydrochloride having less than 10 ppm of alpha,
`beta unsaturated ketones with conventional excipients, i.e.,
`phannaccufically acceptable organic or inorganic carrier sub-
`stances. For oral fonnulations, the dosage forms can provide
`a sustained release of the active component. Suitable phar-
`maceutically acceptable carriers include but are not limited
`to, alcohols, gum arable, vegetable oils, betray] alcohols,
`polyethylene glycols, gelate, carbohydrates such as lactose,
`amylose or starch, magnesium stearate, talc, silicic acid, vis—
`cous parnfiin, perfume oil, fatty acid monoglyocrides and
`diglyceridcs, pcntacn'ythritol fatty acid esters, hydroxy—mcth—
`ylccllulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, etc. The pharmaceutical
`preparations can be sterilized and ifdcsired mixed with aux-
`iliary agents, eg, lubricants, disintegrants, preservatives, sta-
`bilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, salts for influencing
`osmotic pressure buffers, colouring, devouring andlor aro-
`
`

`

`Case 1:12-cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1 Filed 11/07/12 Page 17 of 54
`Case 1:12—cv-08115-ALC-GWG Document 1
`Filed 11/07/12 Page 17 of 54
`
`US 7,851,482 B2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`3
`matic substances and the like. The compositions intended for
`oral use may be prepared according to any method known in
`the art and such compositions may contain one ormore agents
`selected born the group consisting of inert, non-toxic phar-
`maceutically acceptable excipients that are suitable for the
`manufacture oftablets. Such excipients include, for'exarnple
`an inert diluent such as lactose; granulating anddisintegratin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket