throbber
Teva, Purdue Put OxyContin Litigation Behind Them - Law360
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/11886/teva-purdue-put-oxycontin-litigat...
`
`Advanced Search
`
`
`
`National Economic Research ...
`My Account
`My Feeds and Alerts
`Newsletter Signup
`Help
`
`National Eco...
`
`
`
`National Economic Research ...
`My Account
`My Feeds and Alerts
`Help
`Newsletter Signup
`
`Advanced Search
`
`
`
`Adv. Search & Platform Tools
`Browse all sections
`Banking
`Bankruptcy
`Class Action
`Competition
`Employment
`Energy
`Insurance
`Intellectual Property
`Product Liability
`Securities
`Rankings
`Glass Ceiling Report
`Global 20
`Law360 400
`
`Close
`
`1 of 4
`
`12/17/2014 12:06 PM
`
`1
`
`

`

`Teva, Purdue Put OxyContin Litigation Behind Them - Law360
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/11886/teva-purdue-put-oxycontin-litigat...
`
`MVPs of the Year
`Most Feared Plaintiffs Firms
`Practice Group Partner Rankings
`Practice Groups of the Year
`Pro Bono Firms of the Year
`Rising Stars
`Site Menu
`Join the Law360 team
`Search legal jobs
`Learn more about Law360
`Read testimonials
`Contact Law360
`Sign up for our newsletters
`Help
`
`Teva, Purdue Put OxyContin Litigation Behind
`Them
`
`Share us on: By Lindsay Fortado
`
`Law360, New York (October 16, 2006, 12:00 AM ET) -- A federal judge has signed off on the settlement
`agreement over a generic version of painkiller OxyContin between generic drug maker Teva Pharmaceuticals
`Industries Ltd. and Purdue Pharma LP, bringing pending litigation to an end.
`
`Israel-based Teva was given a full release from the litigation and Stamford, Conn.-based pharmaceutical
`Purdue will not seek damages for past infringement, the companies said.
`
`Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Teva will cease selling oxycodone products at an unspecified
`future date. Teva said that it anticipates sales of its generic OxyContin at least until March 31, 2007.
`
`“We are pleased that Teva will respect our invention of an important medicine,” said Michael Friedman,
`president and chief executive officer of Purdue Pharma LP.
`
`“I believe we would have prevailed in our lawsuit and the court eventually would have ordered Teva to stop
`selling its infringing product. Because of today’s agreement, we no longer have to wait for a trial, and
`possible appeals, in order to secure the result provided in the agreement. We have avoided the risks,
`uncertainty and costs of continued litigation.”
`
`The settlement agreement became effective on Monday. The terms were revealed by the companies on
`August 29, 2006, but were still awaiting the approval of the United States District Court for the Southern
`District of New York.
`
`Also on August 29, in another patent infringement suit involving the $2 billion-a-year painkiller, Purdue
`stated it had settled another case over a copycat version of OxyContin. The settlement with generic maker
`Endo Pharmaceuticals stipulated that Endo must stop producing the drug.
`
`2 of 4
`
`12/17/2014 12:06 PM
`
`2
`
`

`

`Teva, Purdue Put OxyContin Litigation Behind Them - Law360
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/11886/teva-purdue-put-oxycontin-litigat...
`
`Endo has agreed to stop selling its generic by the end of 2006, and in exchange, Purdue has agreed not to
`pursue damages for past infringements, Purdue said.
`
`The litigation to protect three OxyContin patents has been rife with pitfalls for Purdue.
`
`In a surprising turnaround in February, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated its earlier
`ruling that Purdue Pharma’s patents for the blockbuster painkiller OxyContin were unenforceable, throwing
`the case back to the lower court for reconsideration.
`
`On February 1, the Federal Circuit reversed itself, handing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
`New York authority to decide the fate of the patent battle between Purdue and Endo.
`
`The decision gave Purdue another chance to defend the three patents behind OxyContin, which earns over
`75% of the company’s revenue.
`
`The ruling put into jeopardy the sale of Endo’s generic version of the painkiller, which had already netted the
`company $80 million.
`
`The turnaround in the case stemmed from Purdue asking the Federal Circuit in July 2005 to review its
`decision the previous month to uphold a lower court’s determination that the three patents were
`unenforceable due to inequitable conduct before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`The petition sought an en banc rehearing by the full panel of judges of the court following a three-judge
`panel’s unanimous affirmation of a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
`
`Endo, which won the Federal Circuit case, said it had been asked to file a response brief in the case.
`
`Endo used the court’s fraud finding as the basis of a lawsuit seeking to prevent Purdue from introducing its
`own “authorized generic” version of OxyContin.
`
`In June 2005, the Federal Circuit upheld a January 2004 ruling from U.S. District Court Judge Sidney Stein
`in the Southern District of New York. Judge Stein said that Purdue repeatedly referred to a “surprising
`discovery” during its patent prosecution, but did not inform the USPTO that the discovery was based on
`"insight" without "scientific proof.”
`
`The appeals court agreed with the lower court that Purdue's applications led the patent office to believe
`Purdue had evidence the oxycodone formula was more effective than other opiates.
`
`“Purdue had no clinical evidence supporting its claim at the time it was made or at any time before the
`patents issued,” the Federal Circuit concluded.
`
`Related Articles
`
`Purdue Fends Off Generic OxyContin Competition
`Federal Circuit Slams Purdue With Inequitable Conduct Finding In OxyContent Patent Suit
`Endo Gets 180-Day Market Exclusivity For OxyContin
`Purdue Pharma Strikes Licensing Deal For OxyContin
`
`3 of 4
`
`12/17/2014 12:06 PM
`
`3
`
`

`

`Teva, Purdue Put OxyContin Litigation Behind Them - Law360
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/11886/teva-purdue-put-oxycontin-litigat...
`
`OxyContin Given New Lease On Life By Federal Circuit
`
`View comments
`
`0 Comments Sign in to comment
`
`Terms of Service
`
`Printable Version
`Rights/Reprints
`Editorial Contacts
`
`Related
`
`Sections
`
`Health
`Intellectual Property
`Life Sciences
`New York
`
`Companies
`
`Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc.
`Purdue Pharma LP
`
`Government Agencies
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Most Read
`
`Deposition In Inter Partes Review Is A Different Animal
`High Court Ruling Sets Low Bar For Class Action Removal
`Baker Sharpens Investigation Skills With Academy Launch
`Skadden Atty Testifies On Failed $21B J&J-Guidant Merger
`New USPTO Guidance Has Fewer Limits On Patent Eligibility
`
`© 2014, Portfolio Media, Inc. About | Contact Us | Site Map | Legal Jobs | Careers at Law360 | Terms |
`Privacy Policy | Help Beta Tools: Track docs | Track attorneys | Track judges
`
`4 of 4
`
`12/17/2014 12:06 PM
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket