throbber
Drugs
`
`May 1996, Vol. 51, No. 5 (pp. 701-894)
`ISSN: 0012-6667
`
`FOCUS ON
`Fosinopril, Verapamil, Losartan Potassium,
`Stavudine, Muromonab CD3
`
`LEADING ARTICLE
`
`HIV Protease Inhibitors
`
`REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Opioid Analgesics
`
`DISEASE MANAGEMENT
`Isolated Systolic Hypertension
`Paediatric Psychopharmacology
`Treatment of Acute Pain in Children
`
`orngting rational drug use
`In Qfsease management
`
`AUCKLAND - CHESTER o FRANKFURT - HONG KONG
`MADRID - MILAN - OSAKA - PARIS - PHILADELPHIA - SYDNEY
`
`Amneal 148
`Amneal v. Endo
`|PR2014—OO36O
`‘
`
`1
`
`

`
` REVIEW ART|CLE oo?销§J733>ii3é'3s3¥éiisllfiiéié
`
`© Adis internationoi Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Opioid Analgesics
`Comparative Features and Prescribing Guidelines
`
`Nathan 1. Cherny
`
`Cancer Pain and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology,
`Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
`
`Contents
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Summary
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`1. Basic Principles .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`1.1 Opioid Receptors .
`1.2 Agonists,PartialAgonists,Agonist—Antagonists and Antagonists .
`1.3 Relative Potency and Equianaigesic Doses .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`1.4 Dose-Response Reiationship
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`1.5 Opioid Classification .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2. Opioid Agonists Conventionaliy Used for Moderate Pain .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.1 Codeine .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.2 Dihydrocodeine
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.3 Hydrocodone .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.4 Oxycodone .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.5 Dextropropoxyphene
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`2.6 Tramadol .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`3. Opioid Agonists Conventionally Used for Severe Pain .
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`3.1 Short HaIf—Life Drugs
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`3.2 Long Ha1f—Life Drugs
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`4. Partial Agonist Opioids .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`4.1 Buprenorphine
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`5. Mixed Agonist-Antagonist Opioids .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`5.1 Pentazocine .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`5.2 Butorphanol
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`5.3 Nciibuphine .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6. Principles of Opioid Administration .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6.1
`Indications for Opioid Analgesia .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6.2 Which Opioid to Use?
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6.3 Routes of Administration .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6.4 Se1ectingaDosage Regimen .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`6.5 Dosage .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7. Adverse Effects of Opioids and Their Management .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.1 Constipation .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.2 Nausea and Vomiting .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.3 Sedation and Cognitive impairment .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.4 Respiratory Depression .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.5 Myocionus .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`7.6 Urinary Retention .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`8. Dependence and Addiction .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`8.1 Physical Dependence .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`8.2 Addiction .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`9. Conclusions .
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`..
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`. 714
`. 714
`. 714
`. 715
`. 715
`. 716
`. 716
`. 717
`. 717
`. 717
`. 717
`. 717
`. 717
`. 717
`. 718
`. 718
`. 721
`. 721
`. 721
`. 721
`. 721
`. 722
`. 722
`. 722
`. 722
`. 723
`. 725
`. 727
`. 728
`. 729
`. 729
`. 729
`. 730
`. 730
`. 730
`. 731
`. 731
`. 731
`. 731
`. 731
`
`2
`
`

`
`714
`
`Summary
`
`
`
`Cherny
`
`The term ‘opioid’ is a generic term for naturally occurring, semisynthetic and
`synthetic drugs which combine with opioid receptors to produce physiological
`effects and which are stereospecifically antagonised by naloxone. For clinical
`purposes, opioids can be classified according to their receptor interactions (ago-
`nist, partial agonist, agonist-antagonist and antagonist), the pain intensity for
`which they are conventionally used (moderate or severe), and their half-life (short
`or long). Pure agonists conventionally used for moderate pain, short and long
`half-life pure agonists conventionally used for severe pain, mixed agonist-antag-
`onists and partial agonist opioids are described in detail. The effective clinical
`use of opioid drugs requires familiarity with drug selection, routes of administra-
`tion, dosage guidelines and potential adverse effects. Opioids are unequivocally
`indicated in the management of severe acute pain and moderate to severe pain
`associated with cancer. There is increasing acceptance of the role of opioids in
`the management of recurring acute pain, chronic nonmalignant pain of organic
`origin and severe neuropathic pain. The selection of opioids is influenced by pain
`intensity, pharmacokinetic and formulary considerations, previous adverse ef—
`fects and the presence of coexisting disease. Some patients will require sequential
`trials of several different opioids before a drug which is effective and well toler-
`ated is identified. Opioid agents should be administered by the most comfortable
`and convenient route that meets the specific needs of the patient. The regimen for
`opioid medications should generally provide around-the-clock analgesia with
`provision for rescue doses for the management of exacerbations of the pain not
`covered by the regular dosage. At all times, uncontrolled pain should be addressed
`by gradual increase in the opioid dose until either pain control is achieved or
`intolerable and unmanageable adverse effects supervene. The management of
`pain with opioid analgesics demands frequent patient assessment and a readiness
`to re-evaluate the therapeutic plan in the setting of either inadequate relief or
`adverse effects.
`
`Y
`
`1
`
`i
`
`,
`
`I,
`
`,
`‘
`
`,
`
`The term ‘opioid’ is a generic term for naturally
`occurring,
`semisynthetic and synthetic drugs
`which produce their effects by combining with opi-
`oid receptors and are antagonised by naloxone.
`Drugs whose primary clinical action is the relief of
`
`pain (primary analgesics) are conventionally clas-
`sified on the basis of site of activity on the opioid
`receptors as either opioid or nonopioid analgesics.
`The term opioid is preferred over ‘opiate’ and
`‘narcotic analgesics’. Opiate is a specific term
`which is used to describe drugs (natural and semi-
`
`synthetic) derived from the juice of the opium
`poppy (i.e. morphine is an opiate but methadone,
`which is a synthetic drug, is not).[” The term nar-
`cotic is derived from the Greek word ‘narke’ mean-
`
`ing numbness or torpor; it is an imprecise and pe-
`jorative term that is not useful in a pharmacological
`
`context. Its use with reference to opioids is discour-
`aged.
`
`i. Basic Principles
`
`i.i Opioid Receptors
`
`Opioids are agonists at highly specific receptor
`sites, and there is general agreement on the exist-
`ence of at least 3 types of opioid receptors: it (mu),
`K (kappa) and 5 (delta).[2] These receptors have
`been further subclassified into distinct subtypes: LL;
`and ug, 51 and 52, and K1, K2 and K3. Recently, sev-
`eral of these receptors have been successfully
`cloned.l3]
`
`Table I shows the putative effects mediated by
`the 3 main opioid receptors.[” Opioid receptors are
`found in several areas of the brain, particularly in
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 19% May: Si (5)
`
`3
`
`

`
`v
`
`715
`Opioid Analgesics
`
`
`Table I. Responses mediated by opioid receptors
`Receptor
`Response on activation
`it (mu)
`Analgesia, respiratory depression, miosis,
`euphoria, reduced gastrointestinal motility
`Analgesia, dysphoria, psychotomimetic effects,
`miosis and respiratory depression
`Analgesia
`
`K (kappa)
`
`5 (delta)
`
`the periaqueductal grey matter, and throughout the
`spinal cord. Supraspinal systems have been de-
`scribed for it}, K3, and 52 receptors while pg, K1,
`and 51 receptors modulate pain at
`the spinal
`level.[2] Recently, opioid receptors have been iden-
`tified in the peripheral nervous system.[4] This ob-
`servation might explain the efficacy of very low
`doses of morphine administered into a site of pe-
`ripheral injury, which has been reported in some
`studies.[5]
`
`i.2 Agonists, Partial Agonists,
`Agonist—Antagonists and Antagonists
`
`On the basis of their interactions with the vari-
`
`ous receptor subtypes, opioid compounds can be
`divided into agonist, partial agonist, agonist-
`antagonist and antagonist classes.
`
`1.2. I Pure Agonists
`An agonist is a drug which has affinity for and
`binds to cell receptors to induce changes in the cell
`which stimulate physiological activity. The pure
`agonist opioid drugs have no apparent ceiling ef-
`fect to analgesia. As the dose is raised, analgesic
`effect increases in a log-linear function, until either
`analgesia is achieved or dose-limiting adverse ef-
`fects (such as somnolence, cognitive impairment,
`myoclonus or respiratory depression) occur.
`Efficacy is defined by the maximal response in-
`duced by administration of the active agent. In
`practice, this is determined by the degree of anal-
`gesia produced following dose escalation through
`a range limited by the development of adverse ef-
`fects. Potency, in contrast, reflects the dose : re-
`sponse relationship. Potency is influenced by phar-
`macokinetic factors (i.e. how much of the drug gets
`in to the systemic circulation and then reaches the
`
`receptors) and by the level of intrinsic activity of
`the drug at the receptor level.
`
`I .2.2 Antagonists
`Antagonist drugs have no intrinsic pharmaco-
`logical action but can interfere with the action of
`an agonist. Competitive antagonists bind to the
`same receptor and compete for receptor sites, while
`noncompetitive antagonists block the effects of the
`agonist in some other way.
`
`1.2.3 Mixed Agonist-Antagonists
`The mixed agonist—antagonist drugs produce
`agonist effects at one receptor and antagonist ef-
`fects at another. In contrast to pure agonists, they
`have a ceiling effect for analgesia. Pentazocine is
`the prototype agonist—antagonist: it has agonist ef-
`fects at K receptors, and weak ti antagonist actions.
`Thus, in addition to analgesia, pentazocine may
`produce i<—mediated psychotomimetic effects not
`seen with full or partial it agonists. When a mixed
`agonist—antagonist is administered together with
`an agonist, the antagonist effect at the it receptor
`can generate an acute withdrawal syndrome.
`
`1.2.4 Partial Agonists
`A partial agonist has low intrinsic activity (effi-
`cacy), so that its dose response curve exhibits a
`ceiling effect at less than the maximal effect pro-
`duced by a full agonist. Buprenorphine is the main
`example of a partial agonist opioid. Increasing the
`dose of such a drug above its ceiling level does not
`result in any further increase in response. When a
`partial agonist is administered together with an ag-
`onist, displacement of the agonist can cause a net
`reduction in pharmacological action which may be
`sufficient to generate an acute withdrawal syn-
`drome. This effect is most likely to occur when it
`is administered to a patient receiving high doses of
`a pure agonist.
`
`1.3 Relative Potency and
`Equianalgesic Doses
`
`The relative analgesic potency is the ratio of the
`dose of 2 analgesics required to produce the same
`analgesic effect. By convention the relative po-
`tency of each of the commonly used opioids is
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 1996 May: 51 (5)
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`716
`
`Cherrzy
`
`I(W
`
`$>7’C1€V’0
`
`tl
`
`ti
`
`|wn.A2*-rs-r-i»~nnx~rnn->nnns;\I~:~l_|
`
`Table II. Equinalgesic intramuscular (IM) and oral (PO) doses of opioid analgesics, their elimination half-lives (ti/23) and duration of action
`
`Drug
`Dosea
`ti/as
`Duration of
`IM
`PO
`lM : PO
`(h)
`action
`potency ratio
`(h)
`1 :3
`3-6
`1 :6”
`1 : 1.5
`1 :2
`
`2-3.5
`
`2-3
`3-4
`
`30
`60*’
`200
`30
`100
`7.5
`20°
`300
`10
`60
`4
`
`120
`6
`0.8
`100
`
`: 5
`1
`1 :2
`1 :4
`1 2 10
`1
`: 6
`1 :2
`
`1
`
`: 1.2
`
`1
`
`: 3
`
`Morphine
`
`10
`
`130
`15
`
`1.5
`10°
`75
`1
`5
`2
`0.19
`100
`
`2-4
`Codeine
`2-4
`Oxycodone
`2-4
`Propoxyphene
`2-4
`2-3
`Hydromorphone
`4-8
`15-20
`Methadone
`2-4
`2-3
`Pethidlne (meperidine)
`3-4
`2-3
`Oxymorphone
`3-4
`0.05“
`Diamorphine (heroin)
`4-8
`12-16
`Levorphanol
`1-3'
`1-2‘
`Fentanyl
`4-6
`3-4
`Tramadol
`4-6
`3
`Phenazocine
`6-9
`2-3
`0.4
`Buprenorphine
`3-4
`2-3
`35
`Pentazocine
`Nalbuphine
`10
`5
`3-6
`
`Butorphanol
`19
`25-359
`4-69
`a Equivalent to IM morphine 10mg.
`b Derived from single—dose study.
`c Derived from single-dose study. At steady-state, potency relative to morphine is probably 1-3 : 10 (see text).
`d Rapidly biotranstormed to morphine and acetyl-morphine (see text).
`e Empirically: transdermal fentanyl 100 pg/h = lM morphine 2-4 mg/h.
`f
`Single-dose data. Continual infusion produces lipid accumulation and prolonged terminal excretion.
`g Transnasal relative potency, ti/2;; and duration of action equivalent to parenteral morphine.
`
`based upon a comparison with 10mg of parenteral
`morphine.[53 Data from single dose and repeated
`dose studies in patients with acute or chronic pain
`have been used to develop an equianalgesic dose
`table (incorporated in table II) that provides guide-
`lines for dose selection when the drug or route of
`administration is changed.
`
`limit on the useful dose of a pure opioid agonist.
`Thus, the efficacy of any particular drug in a spe-
`cific patient will be determined by the degree of
`analgesia produced following dose escalation to
`intolerable and unmanageable adverse effects.[7]
`
`1.5 Opioid Classification
`
`1.4 Dose—Response Relationship
`
`The pure agonist opioid drugs appear to have
`no clinically relevant ceiling effect to analgesia.
`As the dose is raised, analgesic effects increase
`as a log-linear function until either analgesia is
`achieved or dose—limiting adverse effects super-
`venem In practice, however, the appearance of ad-
`verse effects, including confusion, sedation, nau-
`sea, vomiting or respiratory depression, imposes a
`
`For clinical purposes, opioids can be classified
`according to their receptor interactions, the pain
`intensity for which they are conventionally used,
`and their half—life (table 111). The classification of
`
`opioids according to the pain intensity for which
`they are conventionally used has replaced the divi-
`
`sion of opioid agonists into weak versus strong opi-
`oids, incorporated into the original ‘analgesic lad-
`der’ proposed by the World Health Organizationflgl
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs i996 May; 51 (5)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_...WV,._.._._..._...,,_—-.....-.—......-...-..~——_..»——.——--.4~——’v—m~--———-»~-v-——-«-—~*--v------—"---**""""'-'°"”“““"""'"'“"""“‘”“"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`‘emy
`
`717
`Opioid Analgesics
`
`
`)n
`
`9
`
`2. Opioid Agonists Conveniionolly
`Used for Moderate Pain
`
`Codeine, dihydrocodeine, hydrocodone, oxy-
`codone and dextropropoxyphene are typically pre-
`scribed in low dose formulations in combination
`
`with either aspirin or paracetamol (acetamino-
`phen). All of these drugs have a short half-life and
`a duration of action of typically 2 to 4 hours. Using
`these formulations, the dose of these combination
`
`products can be increased until the maximum dose
`of the nonopioid co-analgesic is attained (e. g. para-
`cetamol 4000 to 6000 mg/day; beyond this dose,
`the opioid contained in the combination product
`could be increased as a single agent, or the patient
`could be switched to an alternative pure agonist
`opioid.
`Controlled release (CR) formulations of co-
`
`deine,[9] dihydrocodeinellol and oxycodonemtlzl
`are currently under development. When available,
`these formulations will substantially improve the
`convenience of therapy with these drugs for pa-
`tients with chronic pain. An alternative approach
`for patients with moderate pain incorporates the
`use of low doses of a pure agonist such as morphine
`or oxycodone.
`
`Table III. Classification of opioid analgesics
`Agonists
`Agonist-antagonists
`Conventionally used for
`Pentazocine,
`moderate pain: codeine,
`butorphanol,
`oxycodone,
`nalbuphine,
`dihydrocodeine,
`meptazinol
`dextropropoxyphene,
`tramadol
`
`Partial agonists
`Buprenorphine
`
`Conventionally used for
`strong pain, short
`half-/ife: morphine,
`oxycodone,
`oxymorphone, pethidine
`(meperidine),
`phenazocine,
`diamorphine (heroin),
`fentanyl
`Conventionally used for
`strong pain, long ha/f-life:
`methadone, levorphanol
`
`2.l Codeine
`
`Codeine is the most commonly used opioid
`analgesic for the management of mild to moderate
`pain. It is most commonly used in combination
`with aspirin or paracetamol. Although some vari-
`ability is observed, its plasma half—life and dura-
`tion of action are usually in the range of 2 to 4
`hours.
`
`2.2 Dihydrocodeine
`
`Dihydrocodeine is an equianalgesic codeine an-
`alogue. In the US it is only available in combina-
`tion with paracetamol or aspirin. A single agent CR
`formulation, useful for chronic pain of moderate
`intensity, is available in some countries.“°~13l
`
`2.3 Hydrocodone
`
`Hydrocodone has an oral analgesic potency that
`is approximately half that of oral morphine. It is
`available in the US in a combination tablet that
`
`incorporates hydrocodone 10mg with paracetamol
`l000mg.“4]
`
`2.4 Oxycodone
`
`Oral oxycodone has a high bioavailability
`(60%) and an analgesic potency that is comparable
`to that of morphine.“5l There are limited data to
`suggest that oxycodone is associated with a lower
`likelihood of hallucinations than morphine.“5]
`
`2.5 Dextropropoxyphene
`
`Dextropropoxyphene is a congener of metha-
`done. Its major metabolite, norpropoxyphene, has
`a long half-life and is associated with excitatory
`effects including tremulousness and seizures.“6]
`These effects are dose-related and are not a clinical
`
`problem at the doses of dextropropoxyphene typi-
`cally administered for moderate pain in the non-
`tolerant patient (50 to 100mg every 4 hours)§“7l
`
`2.6 Tramadol
`
`Tramadol is a new centrally acting analgesic
`which possesses opioid agonist properties and
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 19% May: 51 (5)
`
`6
`
`

`
`
`
`Cherny
`
`
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 19% May: 51 (5)
`
`
`
`eventuates in a long half-life in cerebrospinal fluid
`(CSF) of 90 to 120 minutes and extensive rostral
`redistribution.[37]
`
`Morphine undergoes hepatic glucuronidation at
`the 3 and 6 positions, and the metabolites are_ex—
`creted by the kidneys. Morphine—3-glucuronide
`(M3G), the major metabolite,[23] is not an analge-
`sic. There is some evidence that it is an opioid
`antagonist[”} and that M3G concentrations may be
`associated with adverse effects[3°] including the
`uncommon phenomenon of hyperalgesia (so-
`called ‘paradoxical pain’) after morphine adminis-
`tration.[3‘-33] Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) binds
`to opioid receptors[33I and produces potent opioid
`effects in animals[33’35] and humans.[33~36'39] M6G
`
`excretion by the kidney is directly related to calcu-
`lated creatinine clearance.[33] In patients with im-
`paired renal function, M6G may accumulate in
`blood and CSF,[4°] and high concentrations of M6G
`have been associated with toxicity.[36"“v“‘3] These
`data suggest the need for caution when administer-
`ing morphine to patients with renal impairment.
`Single dose studies of morphine in postopera-
`tive cancer patients demonstrated an intramuscular
`to oral (IM : PO) potency ratio of l : 6 (table II).[43l
`However, both bioavailability data[35-4446] and sur-
`veys of patients receiving the drug long term sug-
`gest that a ratio of l
`: 3 or 1 : 2 is more appropriate
`for routine clinical use.[47*48] The usual practice
`when converting from oral morphine to subcutane-
`ous morphine is to divide the oral dose by 2 or 3.
`The development of CR morphine preparations
`has had a major impact on clinical practice. These
`preparations, which can be administered as an 8-
`or 12-hour regimen, provide a much more conve-
`nient means of administering oral morphine.[49]
`They are widely available with a range of tablet
`strengths (l0, l5, 30, 60, 100 and 200mg, depend-
`ing on the country) allowing considerable flexibil-
`ity in its use. In addition to the tablets which are
`
`routinely available, CR suspension[5°] and suppos-
`itories[5” are under development.
`In contrast to morphine elixir or immediate re-
`lease tablets with which peak plasma concentra-
`tions (Cmax) are achieved within the first hour fol-
`
`
`
`,.-.__..._._,._,....
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which also activates monoaminergic spinal inhibi-
`tion of pain.“31 It has modest affinity to opioid u
`receptors and has weak affinity to 5 and K recep-
`tors. Its analgesic effect is partially reversed by nal-
`oxone.“3] Unlike other opioids, it also inhibits the
`uptake of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and sero-
`tonin (5—HT; 5-hydroxytryptamine).[13]
`Tramadol may be administered orally, rectally,
`intravenously, subcutaneously,
`intramuscularly
`and via spinal routes. Data from a double-blind,
`crossover study suggest that oral tramadol 120mg
`is equipotent to oral morphine 3Omg.“9] Intra-
`venous tramadol is approximately one-tenth as po-
`tent as morphine.[3O] Tramadol is generally well tol-
`erated, with dizziness, nausea, sedation, dry mouth
`and sweating being the principal adverse effects.
`Respiratory depression is uncommon.[3°~2”
`
`3. Opioid Agonists Conveniionally Used
`for Severe Pain
`
`3.i Short Hc1lf—Life Drugs
`
`3.1.1 Morphine
`
`Morphine, the main naturally occurring opioid
`derived from the Papaver somnzferum poppy plant,
`is available for therapeutic use as the sulphate,
`hydrochloride and tartrate. Morphine is available
`in 3 oral formulations, an elixir, a conventional re-
`lease tablet, and a CR tablet (of which there are
`now several preparations using different CR mech-
`anisms). In healthy volunteers and cancer patients
`the average bioavailability for oral morphine is 20
`to 30%.m‘25]
`
`The sulphate and hydrochloride salts of mor-
`phine have limited solubility; formulations of up to
`20 mg/ml are routinely available, and they can be
`constituted from lyophilised powder in concentra-
`tions of up to 50 mg/ml. Morphine tartrate is sub-
`stantially more soluble and, in some countries, is
`formulated in a concentration of 80 mg/ml.[26]
`In patients with normal renal function the
`plasma half-life of morphine is 2 to 3 hours. Mor-
`phine is relatively hydrophilic and, when adminis-
`tered epidurally or intrathecally, is not rapidly ab-
`
`sorbed into the systemic circulation. This property
`
`
`7
`
`

`
`
`
`Opioid Analgesics
`
`
`719
`
`lowed by a rapid decline with an elimination half-
`life of 2 to 4 hours, CR morphine typically achieves
`a Cmax 3 to 6 hours after administration, the peak
`is attenuated (compared with a conventional re-
`lease formulation), and plasma concentrations are
`sustained over a 12-hour period.
`Initial dose titration using CR morphine is dif-
`ficult because of the delay in achieving Cmax, the
`attenuation of Cmax, and the long duration of ac-
`tion. Dose finding in these situations is performed
`more efficiently with a short—acting morphine
`preparation. Once the effective dose is identified
`using a conventional release formulation, this may
`be changed to a CR preparation using a milligram
`to milligram conversion. For the same reasons, CR
`morphine is not appropriate for the treatment of
`acute or ‘breakthrough’ pain. A conventional re-
`lease morphine preparation should be provided to
`patients stabilised on CR morphine to be used ‘as
`required’ for breakthrough pain.
`
`3. 7.2 Diamorphine (Heroin)
`Diamorphine is available for legal medicinal
`use only in the UK and Canada. Diamorphine is a
`prodrug that must be biotransformed to 6-acetyl-
`morphine and morphine to produce its analgesic
`effect.[53l Oral diamorphine is an inefficient way of
`delivering morphine to the systemic circulation;
`after the oral administration of diamorphine, only
`morphine can be measured in the patient’s blood.
`Diamorphine is approximately twice as potent
`as morphine by subcutaneous or intramuscular
`injection[53l because of its greater solubility and
`lipophilicity. The high solubility of diamorphine
`(shared also with hydromorphone and morphine
`tartrate) is of particular advantage for patients who
`require large doses of subcutaneous opioids.
`
`3.1.3 Pethidine (Meperidine)
`Pethidine is a synthetic opioid with agonist ef-
`fects similar to those of morphine but a profile of
`potential adverse effects that limits its utility in
`patients who require repeated administration. In-
`tramuscular pethidine 75mg is equivalent to intra-
`muscular morphine 10mg. Pethidine has an oral
`bioavailability of 40 to 60% and its IM : PO rela-
`tive potency ratio is l : 4 (table II). Its duration of
`
`action after parenteral administration is 2 to 3
`hours.
`
`Pethidine is N-demethylated to norpethidine,
`which is an active metabolite that is twice as potent
`
`a convulsant and one-half as potent an analgesic as
`its parent compound. Accumulation of norpethid-
`ine after repetitive administration of pethidine can
`result in CNS excitability characterised by subtle
`mood effects, tremors, multifocal myoclonus and
`occasionally seizures.l54'56] Naloxone does not re-
`verse pethidine-induced seizures and it is possible
`that its administration to patients receiving pethid-
`ine in the long term could precipitate seizures by
`blocking the depressant action of pethidine and al-
`lowing the convulsant activity of norpethidine to
`become manifest.l57l If naloxone is necessary in
`this situation, it should be diluted and slowly ti-
`trated while appropriate seizure precautions are
`taken.
`
`Although accumulation of norpethidine is most
`likely to affect patients with overt renal disease,
`toxicity is sometimes observed in patients with
`normal renal function.[54~56~53l Given the availabil-
`ity of alternative drugs that lack these toxicities,
`its use in acute pain management is not recom-
`1nended[59l and it is relatively contraindicated for
`the management of chronic cancer pain.[59l
`
`3. 1.4 Hydromorphone
`Hydromorphone is a versatile, short half—life
`opioid that can be administered by the oral, rectal,
`parenteral and intraspinal routes.l6°] It is a particu-
`larly useful drug for subcutaneous infusions be-
`cause of its solubility (and the commercial avail-
`ability of a high concentration preparation 10
`mg/ml product) and proven equivalence to intra-
`venous administrationié” For patients who require
`very high opioid doses via the subcutaneous route,
`hydromorphone can be constituted in concentra-
`tions of up to 50 mg/ml from lyophilised powder.
`It is also available in 2, 4 and 8mg tablets and 3mg
`suppositories, all of which usually require 3- to
`4—hourly administration. A CR formulation of oral
`hydromorphone is under development and should
`soon become available.[62l
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 1996 May; 51 (5)
`
`8
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Oxycodone is a synthetic morphine congener
`which has a high oral bioavailability (60 to 90%)
`and an analgesic potency that is comparable to that
`of morphine.“5v45v64l In formulations combined
`with aspirin or paracetamol it is commonly used for
`moderate pain. As a single agent tablet or syrup it
`can be used to manage severe pain effectively.[65]
`Using currently available oral formulations this
`drug usually requires 3- to 4—hourly administration.
`In some countries, oxycodone pectinate is avail-
`able as a 30mg rectal suppository which has a de-
`layed absorption and prolonged duration of ef-
`fect.[66] There are limited data to suggest that
`oxycodone is associated with a lower likelihood of
`hallucinations than morphine.“5l
`
`© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 19% May: 51 (5)
`
`
`Hydromorphone is hydrophilic and, when ad-
`ministered via the epidural route, its pharmaco-
`kinetics, including its long half—life and extensive
`rostral distribution in CSF, are similar to those of
`morphine.[°3l
`
`3.1.5 oxycodone
`
`3. 1.6 Oxymorphone
`
`Oxymorphone is a potent, short half-life conge-
`ner of morphine that is available in the US as in-
`jectable and rectal formulations. Oxymorphone is
`less likely to produce histamine release than mor-
`phine, and may have particular utility for patients
`who develop itch in response to other opioids.l67~63]
`
`3. 1.7 Fentanyl
`
`Fentanyl is a semisynthetic opioid characterised
`by high potency and lipophilicity, and a short half-
`life after bolus administration. Like all other highly
`lipid—soluble drugs, its elimination half-life is in-
`fluenced by the duration of prior administration
`which determines the extent of fat sequestration; in
`steady—state the elimination half-life is usually 7 to
`12 hours.
`
`The development of a transdermal administra-
`tion system has broadened its clinical utility for the
`management of cancer pain.[69‘7” Arecently devel-
`oped oral transmucosal formulation may be useful
`in the management of breakthrough pain in the can-
`cer populationml Fentanyl is also used parenter-
`
`ally as a premedication for painful procedures[591
`and in continual infusion.l73]
`
`A transdermal formulation of fentanyl that de-
`livers 25, 50, 75 or 100 ug/h is commercially avail-
`able. The transdermal system consists of a drug
`reservoir that is separated from the skin by a co-
`polymer membrane that controls the rate of drug
`delivery to the skin surface. Drug is released at a
`nearly constant rate along a concentration gradient
`from the patch to skin. After application of the
`transdermal system, serum fentanyl concentrations
`increase gradually, usually levelling off at 12 to 24
`hours, then remaining stable for a time before de-
`clining slowly. When the patch is removed, serum
`
`concentrations fall 50% in approximately 17 hours
`(range 13 to 22 hours).[59] The slow onset of effect
`after application and an equally slow decline in ef-
`fect after removal are consistent with the develop-
`ment of a subcutaneous depot of drug that main-
`tains the plasma concentration.
`
`There is significant interindividual variability in
`fentanyl bioavailability by this route, and dose ti-
`tration is necessary.l7°~7‘” The dosage interval for
`each system is usually 72 hours, but interindividual
`
`pharmacokinetic variability is large[7°~74v75] and
`some patients require a dosage interval of 48 hours.
`Empirical observations suggest that a 100 ug/h fen-
`tanyl patch is approximately equianalgesic to 2 to
`4 mg/h of intravenous morphine.
`Empirically, the indications for the transdermal
`
`route include intolerance of oral medication, poor
`compliance with oral medication, and occasion-
`
`ally, the desire to provide a trial of fentanyl to pa-
`tients who have reacted unfavourably to other op-
`ioids. Limitations of the transdermal delivery
`system include its cost, the requirement for an al-
`
`ternative short-acting opioid for breakthrough pain
`and poor adhesion to skin in some patients.
`
`3. 1.8 Alfentanil and sufentanil
`
`Alfentanil and sufentanil are fentanyl analogues
`characterised by a short latency, duration of action
`and elimination half-life. They are most commonly
`used as an intraoperative anaesthetics.[76]
`
`9
`
`

`
`Opioid Analgesics
`
`
`721
`
`3. 1.9 Phenazocine
`
`Phenazocine is a synthetic opioid structurally
`related to morphine. One 5mg tablet is equivalent
`to oral morphine 25mg.[77] Phenazocine may be
`given sublingually,[78l though ad

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket