Paper _____
` Filed: May 31, 2013
`
`Filed on behalf of: Party Lo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Michele C. Bosch (michele.bosch@finnegan.com)
`
`Steven P. O’Connor (steven.oconnor@finnegan.com)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: 202-408-4000
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Wise (mwise@perkinscoie.com)
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: 310-788-3210
`Facsimile: 310-788-3399
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`HEI-MUN CHRISTINA FAN and STEPHEN QUAKE
`Junior Party
`(Patent 8,195,415),
`
`v.
`
`YUK-MING DENNIS LO, ROSSA WAI KWUN CHIU, and KWAN CHEE CHAN
`Senior Party
`(Application 13/070,266).
`
`___________________
`
`Patent Interference No. 105,922 (DK)
`(Technology Center 1600)
`___________________
`
`LO LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`SEQUENOM EXHIBIT 1021
`Sequenom v. Stanford
`IPR2014-00337
`
`
` Filed: May 31, 2013
`
`Filed on behalf of: Party Lo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Michele C. Bosch (michele.bosch@finnegan.com)
`
`Steven P. O’Connor (steven.oconnor@finnegan.com)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: 202-408-4000
`Facsimile: 202-408-4400
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael J. Wise (mwise@perkinscoie.com)
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: 310-788-3210
`Facsimile: 310-788-3399
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`HEI-MUN CHRISTINA FAN and STEPHEN QUAKE
`Junior Party
`(Patent 8,195,415),
`
`v.
`
`YUK-MING DENNIS LO, ROSSA WAI KWUN CHIU, and KWAN CHEE CHAN
`Senior Party
`(Application 13/070,266).
`
`___________________
`
`Patent Interference No. 105,922 (DK)
`(Technology Center 1600)
`___________________
`
`LO LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`SEQUENOM EXHIBIT 1021
`Sequenom v. Stanford
`IPR2014-00337
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.120 and 41.204(b), and ¶¶ 104.2.1, 120, and 204 of
`
`the Standing Order (Paper 2), Party Lo provides notice of its proposed motions.
`
`Motion Under Bd.R. 121(a)(1)(ii) to
`Change Benefit Accorded for the Contested Subject Matter:
`
`(1) motion to be accorded benefit of Party Lo’s provisional Application No.
`
`60/951,438, filed July 23, 2007, because this application constitutes a constructive
`
`reduction to practice of an embodiment within the scope of Count 1.
`
`Motion Under Bd.R. 121(a)(1)(iii) for Judgment in the Contested Case:
`
`(2) motion for judgment on the ground that Party Quake’s involved claims are
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 in view of the following prior art
`
`references:
`
`
`
`1. Yuk-Ming Dennis Lo et al., “Diagnosing Fetal Chromosomal Aneuploidy Using
`
`Massively Parallel Genomic Sequencing,” US 2009/0029377, filed 23 July 2008 and
`
`published 29 January 2009, which claims benefit of (and incorporates by reference)
`
`Provisional Application No. 60/951,438, filed 23 July 2007;
`
`
`
`2. Richard A Shimkets, “Sequence-Based Karyotyping,” US 2005/0221341,
`
`published 6 October 2005;
`
`
`
`3. Tian-Li Wang et al., “Digital Karyotyping,” US 2004/0096892, published 20
`
`May 2004;
`
`
`
`4. Tian-Li Wang et al., “Digital karyotyping,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
`
`99(25):16156-61 (10 December 2002);
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Juliane C. Dohm et al., “Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from
`
`high-throughput DNA sequencing,” Nucl. Acids Res., 36(16):e105 (26 July 2008);
`
`
`
`6. Andrew D. Smith et al., “Using quality scores and longer reads improves
`
`accuracy of Solexa read mapping,” BMC Bioinformatics, 9:128 (28 February 2008);
`
`
`
`7. Rossa W. K. Chiu et al., “Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal
`
`chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal
`
`plasma,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105(51):20458-63 (23 December 2008);
`
`
`
`8. Yasuhito Nannya et al., “A robust algorithm for copy number detection using
`
`high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays,”
`
`Cancer Res., 65:6071-79 (2005);
`
`
`
`9. LaDeana W. Hillier et al., “Whole-genome sequencing and variant discovery
`
`in C. elegans,” Nature Methods, 5:183-88 (published online 20 January 2008; including
`
`supplementary text and figures available from nature.com);
`
`
`
`10. David R. Bentley et al., “Accurate whole human genome sequencing using
`
`reversible terminator chemistry,” Nature, 456(7218):53-59 (6 November 2008); and
`
`
`
`11. Susan M. Huse et al., “Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA
`
`pyrosequencing,” Genome Biology, 8:R143 (20 July 2007).
`
`
`
`Party Lo submits that Quake’s involved claims are anticipated or obvious in view
`
`of reference 1, taken either alone or in combination with one or more of references 2-11.
`
`
`
`Party Lo states that reference 1 is not applicable to Lo’s claims as the reference
`
`is related to Lo’s involved application. See Bd.R. 207(c).
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`2
`
`
`
`Motion for Judgment on Priority Under Bd.R. 121(a)(1)(iii):
`
`(3) motion for judgment on priority awarding the subject matter of the
`
`interference to Party Lo based on an earlier date of invention.
`
`Party Lo reserves the right to seek authorization to file responsive motions under
`
`Bd.R. 41.121(2).
`
`Dated: May 31, 2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Michele C. Bosch/__
` Michele C. Bosch
` Registration No. 40,524
`
` Counsel for Party Lo
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing LO LIST OF PROPOSED MOTIONS
`
`was served electronically via the PTAB Interference Web Portal e-filing system on Party
`
`Quake through its attorneys of record on this 31st day of May, 2013, as follows:
`
`R. Danny Huntington, Esq.
`Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D.
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`Suite 800
`607 14th Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`By: _/Michele C. Bosch/
` Michele C. Bosch
` Reg. No. 40,524
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
