throbber
Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 29
` Entered: January 30, 2015
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`RB PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00325
`Patent 8,475,832
`____________
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, and
`ZHENYU YANG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BONILLA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00325
`Patent 8,475,832
`
`
`
`
`On January 28, 2015, a conference call was conducted between respective
`counsel for the parties and Judges Scheiner, Bonilla, and Yang. The purpose of the
`call was to address Petitioner’s request, by e-mail correspondence sent to the Board
`and parties on January 26, 2015, of five additional pages for its reply to Patent
`Owner’s Response. In its e-mail, Petitioner requested additional pages on the basis
`that “Patent Owner presents inconsistent and shifting positions on claim
`construction, and relies on 50 new exhibits, including their own documents which
`contradict their arguments.” See attached.
`As stated during the call, Petitioner contends that “unusual circumstances”
`exist here because (1) Patent Owner’s expert rejects Patent Owner’s data in certain
`instances, but relies on it in other instances; (2) Patent Owner cites 50 new exhibits
`in its Response; and (3) Patent Owner’s expert appears to agree with the Board’s
`claim construction in certain instances, but relies on different claim construction in
`other instances. Patent Owner opposes any extra pages in the reply, responding
`that the issues raised by Petitioner are not unusual, but rather normal advocacy
`positions raised by an opposing party.
`As explained during the call, we do not grant Petitioner additional pages in
`its reply. We are not persuaded that extra pages are justified in this instance. We
`agree with Patent Owner that the “circumstances” presented by Petitioner
`correspond to the type of positions one might expect to present, or respond to, in a
`reply.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for five additional pages for its reply is
`denied.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-00325
`Patent 8,475,832
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Danielle L. Herritt
`McCarter & English, LLP
`dherritt@mccarter.com
`
`Kia L. Freeman
`McCarter & English, LLP
`kfreeman@mccarter.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`James M. Bollinger
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`james.bollinger@troutmansanders.com
`
` Daniel A. Ladow
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`daniel.ladow@troutmansanders.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`From: Herritt, Danielle [mailto:dherritt@mccarter.com]
`Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:17 PM
`To: Trials
`Cc: Bollinger, James Moore; Ladow, Daniel A.; 'Essunger, Magnus'; IPR832
`Subject: IPR2014-00325 - Request for Telephone Conference

`Dear Mr. Patrick E. Baker, 
`
`  
`We request a telephone conference this afternoon with the Board to request 5 additional pages for 
`Petitioner’s Reply due this Friday, January 30, 2015.  Patent Owner presents inconsistent and shifting 
`positions on claim construction, and relies on 50 new exhibits, including their own documents which 
`contradict their arguments.  We believe the Board will benefit from the additional briefing to identify 
`Patent Owner’s inconsistency. 
`
`  
`Counsel for Patent Owner has indicated they are available this afternoon and tomorrow. 
`
`  
`Sincerely, 
`Danielle Herritt 
`  
`
`  
`
`This email message from the law firm of McCarter & English, LLP is for the sole use of the
`intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
`review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
`contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

`

`
`  
`
`Danielle L. Herritt | Partner
`McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
`
`265 Franklin Street | Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`T: 617-449-6513
`F: 617-206-9397
`dherritt@mccarter.com | www.mccarter.com
`
`BOSTON | HARTFORD | STAMFORD | NEW YORK | NEWARK
`EAST BRUNSWICK | PHILADELPHIA | WILMINGTON | WASHINGTON, DC
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket