`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 12
`Entered: July 2, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AMERICAN
`HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA
`LLC, SUBARU OF AMERICA INC., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA,
`INC., and VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CRUISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`____________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, HYUN J. JUNG, and GEORGE R. HOSKINS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`A. DUE DATES
`
`This order sets due dates for the parties to take action after institution
`
`of the proceeding. The parties may stipulate to different dates for DUE
`
`DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6). A
`
`notice of the stipulation, specifically identifying the changed due dates, must
`
`be promptly filed. The parties may not stipulate to an extension of DUE
`
`DATES 6 and 7.
`
`In stipulating to different times, the parties should consider the effect
`
`of the stipulation on times to object to evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)), to
`
`supplement evidence (37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)), to conduct cross-
`
`examination (37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2)), and to draft papers depending on the
`
`evidence and cross-examination testimony (see section B, below).
`
`The parties are reminded that the Testimony Guidelines appended to
`
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.Reg. 48,756, 48,772 (Aug. 14,
`
`2012) (Appendix D), apply to this proceeding. The Board may impose an
`
`appropriate sanction for failure to adhere to the Testimony Guidelines. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.12. For example, reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees
`
`incurred by any party may be levied on a person who impedes, delays, or
`
`frustrates the fair examination of a witness.
`
`1. INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL
`
`The parties are directed to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,765–66 (Aug. 14, 2012) for guidance in preparing for
`
`the initial conference call, and should be prepared to discuss any proposed
`
`changes to this Scheduling Order and any motions the parties anticipate
`
`filing during the trial.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`2. DUE DATE 1
`
`The patent owner may file—
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`A response to the petition (37 C.F.R. § 42.120), and
`
`A motion to amend the patent (37 C.F.R. § 42.121).
`
`The patent owner must file any such response or motion to amend by DUE
`
`DATE 1. If the patent owner elects not to file anything, the patent owner
`
`must arrange a conference call with the parties and the Board. The patent
`
`owner is cautioned that any arguments for patentability not raised in the
`
`response will be deemed waived.
`
`3. DUE DATE 2
`
`The petitioner must file any reply to the patent owner’s response and
`
`opposition to the motion to amend by DUE DATE 2.
`
`4. DUE DATE 3
`
`The patent owner must file any reply to the petitioner’s opposition to
`
`patent owner’s motion to amend by DUE DATE 3.
`
`5. DUE DATE 4
`
`a.
`
`Each party must file any motion for an observation on the
`
`cross-examination testimony of a reply witness (see section C, below) by
`
`DUE DATE 4.
`
`b.
`
`Each party must file any motion to exclude evidence (37 C.F.R
`
`§ 42.64(c)) and any request for oral argument (37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)) by
`
`DUE DATE 4.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`6. DUE DATE 5
`
`a.
`
`Each party must file any reply to an observation on cross-
`
`examination testimony by DUE DATE 5.
`
`b.
`
`Each party must file any opposition to a motion to exclude
`
`evidence by DUE DATE 5.
`
`7. DUE DATE 6
`
`Each party must file any reply for a motion to exclude evidence by
`
`DUE DATE 6.
`
`8. DUE DATE 7
`
`The oral argument (if requested by either party) is set for DUE
`
`DATE 7.
`
`B. CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`Except as the parties might otherwise agree, for each due date—
`
`1.
`
`Cross-examination begins after any supplemental evidence is
`
`due. 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(d)(2).
`
`2.
`
`Cross-examination ends no later than a week before the filing
`
`date for any paper in which the cross-examination testimony is expected to
`
`be used. Id.
`
`C. MOTION FOR OBSERVATION ON CROSS-EXAMINATION
`
`A motion for observation on cross-examination provides the parties
`
`with a mechanism to draw the Board’s attention to relevant cross-
`
`examination testimony of a reply witness because no further substantive
`
`paper is permitted after the reply. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The observation must be a
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`concise statement of the relevance of precisely identified testimony to a
`
`precisely identified argument or portion of an exhibit. Each observation
`
`should not exceed a single, short paragraph. The opposing party may
`
`respond to the observation. Any response must be equally concise and
`
`specific.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL ....................... July 30, 2014 at 11 AM ET
`
`DUE DATE 1 ........................................................................ October 2, 2014
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ......................................................................... January 2, 2015
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ....................................................................... February 2, 2015
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ..................................................................... February 23, 2015
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................... March 9, 2015
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ......................................................................... March 16, 2015
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ......................................................................... March 25, 2015
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00291
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Wab Kadaba
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Clay Holloway
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Matthew D. Satchwell
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`matthew.satchwell@dlapiper.com
`
`Steven Reynolds
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`matthew.satchwell@dlapiper.com
`
`William H. Mandir
`SUGHRUE MION PLLC
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`
`John M. Caracappa
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`jcaracap@steptoe.com
`
`Matthew J. Moore
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`John R. Kasha
`KASHA LAW LLC
`john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`Kelly L. Kasha
`KASHA LAW LLC
`kelly.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`7
`
`