throbber

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2003
`
`EXHIBIT 2003
`
`

`

`
`
`-
`
`.
`
`, f“;
`
`.
`
`
`
`'-:
`
`'
`
`UNITED-STATE ,EPAnmENTOF COMMERCE
`
`-
`.‘Pmmandmdcfiaarkomce
`-Mdrm GOMMISSIONEHOFPATENTSANDMDEMAHKS
`.
`-- mam. mama:
`-
`.
`
`-
`
`
`
`09/229,595
`
`91/13/99
`
`TQTI F“
`
`‘I'
`
`'
`mm a mum '
`235 WEST PORTAL AVENUE #15
`
`an FRANCISIIG CA 94137—1a23
`
`PM92/0202
`'-
`
`"
`
`'
`
`'
`
`"“”'”"
`
`'
`
`'
`
`.
`
`(6;.
`
`E,
`
`'
`
`'
`
`nernaxou
`
`. Please find below andfor attached anOffice communication oancemlng thls appllcatlon or
`.pwceadlng.
`
`. Commitment Palm and mumm-
`
`PT'O-IDG Mu. ENE}
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`'
`
`.I- mom
`
`

`

`
`
`Applicantisi
`
`Application No.
`09!! 23.595
`Examiner
`
`David M. Pure!
`
`Andrew Toti
`
`Group Art Unit
`3634
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`iiiil.iiii'iliiii
`
`
`X Responsive to communicationls} filed on Ma 7 1.9.9.9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E This action is FINAL.
`
`{3 Since this application is in condition ior allowance except for formal matters. prosecution as to the merits is closed
`in accordance with the practice under Ex perm Quayle, 1935 CD. 11; 453 0.6. 213.
`
`monthisi. or thirty days. whichever
`3
`A shortened statute-oiI period for response to this action is set to expire
`is longer. from the mailing date oi this communication. Failure to respond within the period for response will cause the
`application to become abandoned.
`(35 U.S.C. § 133}. Extensions of time may be obtained under the provisions of
`37 CFFI1.136iai.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`{Xi Claimis] 1-16 18-24 and 23-34
`
`Of the above. claimlsi
`
`
`El Cieimis]
`
`
`ir-ro‘= rat-24, and 26-34
`
`m Cleimlsi
`: Cieimie}
`
`: Claims
`
`isiere pending in the application.
`
`islare withdrawn from consideration.
`
`isiare allowed.
`
`isiere rejected.
`isiare objected to.
`
`are subject to restriction or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`__ See the attached Notice of Draftspereon‘e Patent Drawing Review, PTO-948.
`
`
`The drewingisi filed on
`
`
`
`The proposed drawing correction, filed on
`_ The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`_ The oeth or declaration is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`isiare obiected to by the Examiner.
`
`
`is
`
`:hpproved
`
`
`
`Elisapproved.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`'3 Acknowledgement is made of a claim for foreign priorityI under 35 11.5.0 5 Halal-id}.
`:i All
`[I Some' EINone
`of the CERTIFIED copies oi the priority documents have been
`C received.
`
`C received in Application No. iSeries CodeiSeriai Number}
`Ci received in this nationei stage application from the International Bureau iPCT Rule 17.2iaii.
`’Certified copies not received:
`[:I Acknowledgement is made of a claim for domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. E 11 Ste].
`
`Attachmentls]
`le Notice oi References Cited, PTO-892
`Information Disclosure Stetementisi, PTO-1449. Paper Noisi.
`U Interview Summary, PTO-413
`:i Notice oi Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review, PTO-948
`
`3 Notice of informal Patent Application. PTO-152
`I
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— SEE OFFICE ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES --
`
`u. S. Pet-m and Trademark Ollie:
`PTO-326 [Rem 9—95!
`
`
`
`Part of Paper No.
`
`5
`
`Ofiice Action Summary
`
`

`

`
`
`Art Unit: 3634
`
`Application/Control Number: 09/229,595
`
`1.
`
`The preliminary amendment filed on May 7, 1999 has been
`
`entered.
`
`2.
`
`The drawings are objected to for there are two separate
`
`figures labeled “Fig. 44".
`
`The drawings contain Fig. 39A for which there is no
`
`description in the specification under the section ‘Brief
`
`Description of the Drawings”.
`
`Correction is required.
`
`3.
`
`One page 1.
`
`the status of the listed related applications
`
`are to be updated. Correction is required.
`
`4.
`
`The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because of the
`
`inclusion of legal phraseology “comprises, comprising, means”.
`
`Correction is required.
`
`See MPEP § 608.Ul(b3.
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs
`
`of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under
`
`this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —~
`
`the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in
`{b}
`this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more
`than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the united
`States.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 09/229,595
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 3634
`
`Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being clearly
`
`anticipated by Kuhar
`
`‘100. Kuhar
`
`‘100 discloses a window
`
`covering including a pluralitfi of spring drives 40 (see figure
`
`3).
`
`6.
`
`The following non—statutory double patenting rejection is
`
`based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy
`
`(a policy reflected in the statute} so as to prevent the
`
`unjustified or improper timewise extension of the right to
`
`exclude granted by a patent.
`
`In re
`In re Sarett. 327 F.2d 1005, 140 USPQ 474 [CCPA 1964);
`Schneller, 397 F.2d 350, 158 USPQ 210 (CCPA 1968}; In re White,
`405 F.2d 904, 160 USPQ 644 {CCPA 1969};
`In re ThoringtonIr 418
`F.2d 528, 163 USPQ, 644 [CCPA 1969};
`In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 433,
`164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970);
`In re Van Ornam,r 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ
`761 {CCPA 1982]:
`In re Long—i,r 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed.
`Cir. 1985}; and In re Goodman, 29 USPQ 2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
`
`A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37
`
`CFR 1.321(b) would overcome an actual or provisional rejection on
`
`a non-statutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting
`
`application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this
`application.
`See 37 CFR l.78{d).
`
`Claims 1-16,18e24.26-34 are provisionally rejected over the
`
`claimed disclosure of application Serial no. 08f989,142 on the
`
`basis of the judicially created non—statutory doctrine of double
`
`patenting.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 09/229,595
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 3634
`
`
`
`The subject matter of claims l-l6,13-24,26-34 of the instant
`
`application are fully disclosed in the claims of applicant's
`
`Serial no. 08/989,142 and/or that portion of the disclosure which
`
`provides support for such claims. The allowance of the claims of
`
`the instant application would extend the rights to exclude
`
`already presented in the claims of the pending application.
`
`Thus,
`
`the controlling fact is that patent protection for the
`
`devicer fully disclosed in and/or covered by the claims of the
`
`pending application, would be extended by allowance of the claims
`
`of the instant application.
`
`Primary Examiner
`Art Unit 3634
`
`BM?
`Jamil” 19, 2000
`(1'03) 303-2168
`
`

`

`
`
`_
`_
`Notice of References (fined
`
`Applicantls}
`
`Application No.
`09:229595
`Examine,
`
`David M. Pulnl
`
`'-
`Androw Tofi
`mm M um
`3334
`
`Page ‘1 of 1
`
`“.3. PATENT DO GUMENTS
`
`I.
`
`DDCLIIENT ND
`
`
`
`GLASS-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOREIGN PATH“ DOCUMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—ON-PATENT DOCUMENTS
`i
`DOMEIT {mu Mm. Till. 8m IndW Pia-s!
`DATE
`
`
`
`
`
`U. S. Pawn: and ‘lminmnlk Oflicn
`
`PTO-892 (Rev. 9-95]
`
`Notice of Rafaences Cited
`
`Part of Paper No.
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket