throbber
2:14-cv-11517-AJT-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 10/29/14 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 57
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11517-
`AJT-RSW
`
`The Honorable Arthur J. Tarnow
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CRUISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
`LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`V.
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.
`INC.,
`
`DEFENDANT.
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff Cruise Control Technologies LLC (“CCT”) and
`
`Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (“Honda”) have resolved all
`
`disputes and claims between them relating to this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`10939226v2
`
`

`

`2:14-cv-11517-AJT-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 10/29/14 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 58
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, CCT and Honda hereby stipulate to the dismissal of
`
`all claims and counterclaims asserted or that could have been asserted by CCT and
`
`Honda in this action, including any claim for attorneys’ fees and costs. CCT and
`
`Honda jointly stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs of
`
`court and expenses.
`
`DATE: October 29, 2014
`
`
`/s/Kristen L. Baiardi
`
`ABBOTT NICHOLSON, P.C.
`Robert Y. Weller II (P 31148)
`Kristen L. Baiardi (P71931)
`300 River Place, Suite 3000
`Detroit, MI 48207-4225
`TEL: 313.566.2500
`FAX: 313.566.2502
`ryweller@abbottnicholson.com
`klbaiardi@abbottnicholson.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Cruise Control
`Technologies LLC
`
`
`/s/Paul T. O'Neill
`
`BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP
`Paul T. O’Neill
`41000 Woodward Avenue
`Suite 200 East
`Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
`TEL: 248.205.3300
`FAX: 248.205.3399
`paul.oneill@bowmanandbrooke.com
`
`
`Attorney for Defendant
`American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
`
`10939226v2
`
`

`

`2:14-cv-11517-AJT-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 10/29/14 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 59
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-11517-
`AJT-RSW
`
`The Honorable Arthur J. Tarnow
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CRUISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
`LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`V.
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.
`INC.,
`
`DEFENDANT.
`
`
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`
`On this day, Plaintiff Cruise Control Technologies LLC (“CCT”) and
`
`Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (“Honda”) announced to the
`
`Court that they have resolved all claims asserted or that could have been asserted
`
`by them in this case. CCT and Honda have therefore requested the Court dismiss
`
`all claims and counterclaims asserted or that could have been asserted by them in
`
`this case with prejudice, including any claim for attorneys’ fees or taxation of
`
`costs of court, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs of court and
`
`expenses.
`
`The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their
`
`request for dismissal should be granted.
`
`10939226v2
`
`

`

`2:14-cv-11517-AJT-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 10/29/14 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 60
`
`
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims asserted
`
`in this case are dismissed with prejudice.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and
`
`expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of October 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Arthur J. Tarnow
`
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`10939226v2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket